Majestic Care Of North Vernon

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 20.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 94.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent pressure ulcers that resulted in the development of Stage 3 pressure ulcers (Residents 16 and 103) and follow a physician's order (Resident 91) for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. During an observation of Resident 16's wound on 05/11/23 at 9:43 A.M., the Wound NP (Nurse Practitioner) cleansed the wound to the left heel. The area had slightly macerated skin. The wound bed was pink with no drainage. The wound measured 0.4 cm (centimeters) x (by) 0.4 cm. The Wound NP indicated she expected the wound to be macerated due to the treatment she had in place. The clinical record for Resident 16 was reviewed on 05/10/23 at 1:52 P.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 02/22/23, indicated the resident was rarely/never understood. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, anxiety, depression, and contracture. The resident required total staff assistance with transfers, locomotion, eating, toileting, personal hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident's allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for abuse allegations reviewed. (Resident C) Findings include:During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 10:19 A.M., Resident C indicated she had been hit by Resident F in her left shoulder on Friday 03/20/2026. Resident C told the nurse, and another staff member in the front of the building. The nurse told her she would be okay. During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 4:22 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 indicated if there was an incident where a resident claimed to be hit by another resident, she would report it directly to the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) verbally. Outside of telling management verbally floor staff do not document about the occurrence. Management staff would be the ones to document the incident details. During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 4:31 P.M., the Administrator indicated he was not informed about the incident that occurred on Friday until the Monday after. He had just begun his own investigation. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of medications after discharge for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident G and Resident H) Findings include:1.a. During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 2:09 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated medications that required refrigeration were kept in the facility medication room refrigerator on the Unit C Hallway. At one time Ozempic (a medication used for weight loss) was stored in the refrigerator in her office, but it was no longer stored there. During an observation and interview, on 03/23/2026 at 2:18 P.M., a miniature refrigerator in the back right corner of the Director of Nursing's office was observed with three Ozempic medications. Two separate Ozempic medications for Resident G and one for Resident H. The DON indicated both residents had been discharged from the facility. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 03/24/2026 at 9:30 A.M. A Discharge - Return not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/31/2026, indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store medications for 1 of 2 medication storage areas reviewed for Drug and Biologicals storage. (Director of Nursing Office) Findings include:During an observation, on 03/23/2026 at 2:18 P.M., a miniature refrigerator in the back right corner of the Director of Nursing (DON) office contained the following medication, vaccines, and personal food/drink items : Ozempic, two single dose vials of Prevnar 20 (pneumococcal 20 valent vaccine), two single dose vials of RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus vaccine), Unopened individually wrapped sandwich, dressing bottle half full, four 12 ounce cans of lemonade unopened, one bottle of water 3/4 full, and a personal water bottle. During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 2:44 P.M., the DON indicated she had forgotten about the medications being in her refrigerator and resident medications should never be stored with personal food items. The current facility policy, titled Medication Storage, with a reviewed date of 12/12/2023, was provided by the DON on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe water temperatures for 5 of 9 resident bathrooms and 1 of 2 common area bathrooms observed. (Rooms C 101, C 102, D 114, D 115, D 116, and Women's Visitor Restroom)Findings include:During an observation, on 10/27/2025 at 10:35 A.M., the water in the Women's Visitor Restroom in the main hallway was hot to touch, not able to hold the hand under the water. The door was unlocked, unless it was in use and several residents had independently passed by the restroom.During an observation and interview, on 10/27/2025 at 10:40 A.M., Resident Room D 116's bathroom sink water was hot to touch. Resident E indicated she had no concerns with her water.During an observation, on 10/27/2025 from 10:47 A.M. to 11:01 A.M., the Maintenance Director checked the water temperatures in the following rooms:-Room D-116 the water temperature was 124.0 degrees Fahrenheit,-Room D-115 the water temperature was 122.5 degrees Fahrenheit,-Room D-114 the water temperature was 124.3 degrees Fahrenheit,-Room C-101 the water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet the needs of a resident related to image acquisition by a contracted x-ray staff member. The resident's arm was improperly positioned and she cried out for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diagnostic services. The resident's arm resulted with a fracture. (Resident B)Findings include:During an observation, on 10/15/2025 at 9:12 A.M., Resident B was lying in bed, her eyes were closed. There were no signs of distress. The resident had a red cast on her right arm that went from her hand up past her elbow. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/15/2025 at 9:23 A.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, arthritis, and aphasia. The resident had physical impairments on one side of the upper and lower extremities.A Progress Note, dated 08/27/2025 at 9:49 P.M., indicated the resident was noted to have redness to both elbows,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated a resident with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Residents C)Findings include: During an interview on 07/28/2025 2:46 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 indicated in June of 2025 Resident C informed her she was hungry, and her cornbread was thrown away. CNA 2 then heard Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 talk about Resident C. LPN 3 stated that Resident C had asked her to microwave the cornbread she had saved from her lunch. LPN 3 agreed but told Resident C not to stand up while she was gone. Upon returning LPN 3 saw Resident C walking and told her she no longer can have the cornbread for not listening. LPN 3 then said she threw away the corn bread. CNA 2 reported it to her superiors. A facility document, dated 06/20/25 at 11:45 A.M., provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/28/25 at 3:18 P.M., indicated Resident C reported LPN 3 told her to sit down in her chair and not move until she got back. She pointed to the chair that was pushed in under the overbed table near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The D-Hall Dining room meal service was observed on 06/08/25 at 11:51 A.M. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 9 pushed a chair in the dining room using her hands, touched her nose with her left hand, sat down in a chair by three residents sitting at the table nearest the kitchen door, touched her face and ear with her right hand, then served a meal tray to Resident 6. CNA 9 touched the resident's plate and napkin, unrolled the napkin, took out the silverware, removed the foil from the resident's baked potato, chopped it up with the resident's fork holding the fork in her right hand, opened the resident's sour cream packet, and squirted the sour cream on the resident's potato. The resident picked up the fork and fed herself. CNA 9 used hand sanitizer then served a tray to another resident. During an interview, on 06/11/25 at 2:11 P.M., CNA 9 indicated when serving meal trays, staff were to use hand sanitizer after each tray and wash their hands after three to five trays. Staff were not to touch themself before serving meal trays. The current Handwashing-Hand Hygiene policy, with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines during a wound dressing change, and for indwelling urinary catheter management for 4 of 21 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents 2, 100, 101, and 15) Findings include: 1. A wound dressing change for Resident 2 was observed on 06/10/25 at 10:41 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 and LPN 10. The LPN's donned gowns in the hallway from a cart of supplies sitting next to the resident's room door. LPN 10 donned gloves. With her gloves on, she reached into her pocket on her scrubs, got her treatment cart keys out, and used them to open the cart. She gathered treatment supplies, took them into the resident's room, laid the supplies on the over bed table, went into the bathroom located in the resident's room, did not turn on the water or change gloves, came out with paper towels, and put the paper towels on the over bed table. LPN 10 opened several gauze pads and made a stack,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. During an observation and interview, on 06/08/25 at 10:19 A.M., Resident 37 was sitting on the side of the bed in her room. There were three medication cups sitting on the resident's bedside table. One medication cup contained three small white capsules, the second one contained a large white capsule, and the third one contained a large round pill broke in half, a medium round peach colored pill, one large round pill, one medium round white pill. The resident indicated the medications were hers and the nurse had left them for her to take. No staff members were in or near the resident's room or in the hallway outside the resident's room. The clinical record was reviewed on 06/10/25 at 11:03 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/21/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, heart failure, dementia, anxiety, and depression. During an interview, on 06/11/25 at 9:54 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated medications should not have been left at the resident's bedside. A resident should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan related to prophylactic antibiotic usage for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 58) Findings include: Resident 58's clinical record was reviewed on 06/11/25 at 3:24 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/28/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, diabetes, and renal insufficiency. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident's current physician's orders included, but were not limited to the following: - An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 02/13/25, for Cephalexin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams, once daily for prophylaxis for recurrent UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections). The resident's Electronic Medication Administration Records for February, March, April, May, and June 2025 indicated the resident received the antibiotic daily since 02/13/25. The resident's complete Care Plan Report was reviewed on 06/12/25 at 10:45 A.M. and lacked a care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN