No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Point Place

6101 N Summit St, Toledo, OH 43611 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (419) 727-7870 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Dec 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2755 Shoreland Ave · (419) 479-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.2 mi
4869 N Summit St · (419) 726-8449 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Meijer1.7 mi
1500 E Alexis Rd · (419) 727-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5470 Patriot Dr · (419) 392-0399 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.7%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.7%CMS range 35.7–62.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.3–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
58.4%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run reports, review of crash cart audit logs, review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation certification documentation, review of a medication administration audit report, review of a vital documentation audit report, review of the American Heart Association (AHA) guidance for adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), staff interview, EMS staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Resident #77, who had a full code status (advance directives), with basic lifesaving interventions on [DATE] by not immediately initiating rescue breathing or ventilations while performing chest compressions. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 failed to immediately call 911 and/or instruct another staff member to call 911 until after the resident was assessed with an absence of vital signs, after checking code status, after taking the crash cart to the resident's room and after beginning chest compressions. After beginning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of a self -reported incident, review of facility investigation, review of in-service records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure supervision and a safe environment was provided to prevent the elopement of a resident.Actual harm occurred on 07/29/25, when Resident #47 eloped from the facility through an unalarmed and unlocked exit door in the dining room. Resident #47 fell, sustaining an acute mildly displaced fracture of the right distal fibula at the ankle. This affected one (Resident #47) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 10/13/22, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/07/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the crash cart checklist logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the two facility crash carts were properly maintained. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 76. Findings include:Review of the facility crash cart checklist for the 200/300 hall dated [DATE] through [DATE] revealed facility staff checked the contents of the cart on the first of the month. If the cart had not been used then the intact lock tag number was verified and signed off daily as intact by staff. The contents of the cart were last verified on [DATE] and signed off daily through [DATE]. There were no directions on the crash cart checklist alerting staff to check for expired items. Review of the facility crash cart checklist for hall 100 dated [DATE] through [DATE] revealed the facility staff checked the contents of the cart on the [DATE]. No lock number was noted on the checklist from [DATE] through [DATE]. On [DATE] the crash cart lock tag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of weekly skin assessments, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure routine skin assessments were completed and physician ordered wound interventions were implemented. This affected two (#29 and #12) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility identified a total of 18 residents as having wounds. The facility census was 76.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/04/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage four, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, chronic or unspecified peptic ulcer with hemorrhage, vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, and hypothyroidism.Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #29 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three. Resident #29 was dependent on staff Furthermore, Resident #29 did not have any wounds,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a facility statement, review of Emergency Medical Services incident run reports, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and thorough documentation in the medical record. This affected two (#14, #77) of three residents reviewed for medical documentation. The facility census was 76.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, hypertension, and spinal stenosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident used a walker for ambulation with staff supervision. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and partial/moderate supervision for transfers. The resident wore a wander/elopement alarm daily. Review of the elopement risk assessment completed [DATE] and [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for elopement. Review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain required infection control standards during a dressing change. This affected one (#49) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure bedpans and basins were properly stored in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#34) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified eight residents utilizing bedpans. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #49's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation of the 100-hall medication cart, and policy review, the facility failed to administer an as needed seizure medication for a resident having a seizure. This affected one (#17) of three residents reviewed for as needed seizure medications. The facility census was 64. Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/25. Diagnoses included epilepsy, intractable without status epilepticus, type two diabetes mellitus, moderate persistent asthma, anxiety, orthostatic hypotension and peripheral vascular disease.Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Furthermore, Resident #17 was noted to take anticonvulsant medication.Review of Resident #17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a residents were care planned for hearing aids which resulted in the facility failing to ensure resident hearing aids were maintained and in good working order. This affected one (#61) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The facility census was 63.Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/14/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, dementia, Parkinson's, and transient ischemic attack.Review of Resident #61's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition, had moderate hearing loss and required the use of hearing aids.Review of Resident #61's most recent care plan revealed the care plan failed to address hearing loss nor the need for hearing aids.Review of Resident #61's physician order dated 02/14/25 revealed the resident should be seen by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#18) was showered and received haircuts timely. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 63.Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/22. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, convulsion, chronic kidney disease, and transient ischemic attack.Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderately intact cognition. He required supervision or touching assistance for showers.Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #18 required minimal assistance with activities of daily living related to dementia and a history of falls. Nail care was to be completed on bath days and as necessary. Supervision and touch assist was required for shower and bathing.Review of Resident #18's skin observation shower sheets revealed the resident received a shower on 09/10/25 and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care. This affected one (#03) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 63. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 06/02/17 with a readmission date of 11/04/22, diagnoses included pneumonia, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dysphagia, and depression.Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/25, revealed Resident #03 had severely impaired cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance for rolling from left to right and for toileting hygiene, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had a feeding tube.Observation on 12/17/25 at 12:20 P.M. of incontinence care provided by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #123 for Resident #03 revealed CNA #123 performed hand hygiene, put on gloves, and used a cloth washcloth to cleanse and rinse Resident #03 who had been incontinent of urine. CNA #123 cleansed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely respond to pharmacist recommendations. This affected one (#63) of five residents reviewed for pharmacist recommendations. The facility census was 63.Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 02/06/25 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/25, revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition and received hypoglycemic medications.Review of the pharmacy recommendation to prescriber, dated 08/10/25, revealed a recommendation to check Resident #63's hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) laboratory value. Further review revealed the physician responded 08/15/25 with a statement ok to draw lab. Review of the laboratory test results for Resident #63 revealed a HbA1c test was drawn 10/02/25.Interview on 12/17/25 at 2:59 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed no HbA1c was drawn for Resident #63 between 08/15/25 and 10/02/25. The DON further stated Resident #63's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide appropriate portions and all menu items for residents on a pureed diet. This affected two (#4 and #64) of two residents identified on a pureed diet. The facility census was 63.Observation in the kitchen on 09/30/25 at 4:05 P.M. revealed [NAME] #195 preparing pureed meals for the evening meal. [NAME] #195 used an 8-ounce scoop to portion out turkey and dumplings for preparation. Concurrent interview with [NAME] #195 confirmed he only needed one 8-ounce scoop for two pureed portions of turkey and dumplings. [NAME] #195 stated only two residents, Resident #4 and Resident #64, were on pureed diets.Continued observation revealed [NAME] #195 prepared pureed turkey and dumplings and pureed green beans. [NAME] #195 placed a 4-ounce portion of pureed turkey and dumplings and a 4-ounce portion of pureed green beans onto Resident #4's plate and Resident #64's plate. Concurrent interview with [NAME] #195 confirmed the two items on the plate were the only items residents on a pureed diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to accurately and timely document in the medical records. This affected one Resident (Resident #37) out of ten residents reviewed for documentation. Additionally, the facility failed to transcribe physician orders. This affected four residents (#04, #37, #05, and #63) out of six reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 63. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22, diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left side, gastrostomy status, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/19/25 revealed Resident #04 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADL's), was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the provider notes revealed Resident #04 had left shoulder pain related to a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures were correctly utilized when providing care to residents. This affected three (Residents #03, #22, and #71) of six resident reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 63. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiparesis to the right side following a stroke, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, aphasia, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, colostomy, and stage three pressure ulcer. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #22 revealed the resident was unable to communicate and was severely cognitively impaired, displayed no behaviors at the time of the assessment and was dependent for all care. Resident #22 was at risk for pressure ulcers and three were present on admission to her right heel, scapula, and sacrum. Review of a physician order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person center care plans were updated to include identified resident needs and appropriate interventions. This affected two (#48 and #60) of three residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, cerebrovascular disease, essential hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/02/25, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a facility SRI, completed on 06/05/25, revealed on 05/30/25 at 6:15 P.M. a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was picking up dinner trays and entered Resident #60's room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/05/24 at 9:09 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #203 was taking Resident #14's blood pressure at the medication cart. RN #203 removed the cuff from Resident #14's arm, documented the data, and handed Resident #14 a medicine cup with pills. After Resident #14 consumed the pills, he handed the cup to RN #203 to throw away. RN #203 then proceeded to chart and document at her medication cart. RN #203 was not observed to perform hand hygiene after providing care to Resident #14. Continued observation revealed RN #203 pushed the medication cart to the outside of Resident #15's room. RN #203 opened her medication cart and pulled out a medication push-card and pushed a pill into a medicine cup. RN #203 then opened a bottle and extracted one pill and put it into the medicine cup. Concurrent interview with RN #203 confirmed she did not perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of facility fall investigations and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as ordered and care planned. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, major depression, polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/24, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, was able to make needs known, required substantial or maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), required partial to moderate assistance with transfers and repositioning, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no weight loss, received a mechanically altered diet, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was properly administered to prevent infection. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for the provision of incontinence care. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, major depression, polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/24, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, was able to make needs known, required substantial or maximal assist with activities of daily living (ADLs), required partial to moderate assistance with transfers and repositioning, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no weight loss, received a mechanically altered diet, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. Review of the plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with eating were provided a dignified dining experience. This affected two residents (#44 and #35) of nine residents observed eating lunch in the main dining room. The facility census was 65. Findings Included: Observation on 03/04/24 at 11:18 A.M., of the main dining room, found nine residents seated at four tables. Two residents, Resident #44 and Resident #35, were seated at a square table. The Director of Nursing (DON) was observed standing over Resident #44 and spooning bites of his lunch into his mouth. Interview on 03/04/24 at 11:22 A.M. with the DON verified she was standing to feed Resident #44. The DON reported she was feeding him chicken and dumplings, green beans, a roll, and a cream dessert. Continued observation on 03/04/24 at 11:23 A.M. found the DON asked Resident #35 if he needed help eating. A response was not heard, but the DON was observed standing between Resident #44 and #35 and providing both residents bites of their meals while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when blood glucose levels were outside of established parameters as ordered. This affected one (#36) of three residents reviewed for insulin. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy and polyneuropathy, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, delirium due to known physiological condition, essential hypertension, alcohol abuse, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/21/24, revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #36's physician orders, dated 02/03/24 through 02/08/24, revealed an order for Novolog insulin to inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure orders to discontinue psychotropic medications were followed according to the physician order. This affected one resident (#44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/01/22. Diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies (dementia), schizoaffective disorder, chronic kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic pain, depressive episodes, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three indicating Resident #44 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #44 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living including toilet use, bathing, dressing, transfer, and eating. Resident #44 displayed no behaviors at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record. This affected one (#51) of 16 resident medical records reviewed. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #51, dated 12/14/23, revealed the resident was assessed with moderately impaired cognition and renal disease. Review of a nursing progress note for Resident #51, dated 02/23/24, revealed the nurse practitioner ordered a transfer to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Further review of the progress note revealed it did not include a reason for Resident #51's transfer, such as the signs or symptoms exhibited by Resident #51 to necessitate a hospital transfer, nor any indication of the events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure admission orders were obtained to provide care and treatment to a resident with a suprapubic urinary catheter. This affected one (#8) of one resident identified with a suprapubic catheter. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/01/24, with diagnoses including, gastroparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, colostomy, stage 4 pressure ulcer left buttock, sepsis, anemia, chronic respiratory failure, paraplegia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 was assessed with intact cognition, ability to make needs known, dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were applied as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#9) of three residents reviewed for the application of wound treatments. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/23, with the diagnoses including: acute respiratory failure, chronic coronary microvascular dysfunction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, dementia, autoimmune hepatitis, and stage 3 pressure ulcer to right and left buttock. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #9 with intact cognition, required substantial or maximal assistance with activities of daily living, dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfer, frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and at risk for pressure ulcer development. Review of a nursing plan of care, revealed it was revised 12/11/23 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide consistent care and treatment to a resident identified with a suprapubic catheter. This affected one (#8) of one resident identified with a suprapubic catheter. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/01/24 with diagnoses including, gastroparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, colostomy, stage 4 pressure ulcer left buttock, sepsis, anemia, chronic respiratory failure, paraplegia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 was assessed with intact cognition, ability to make needs known, dependent on staff for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and laboratory contract review and policy review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory blood testing within physician ordered timeframes. This affected one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for laboratory blood testing. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/14/23, with the diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, epilepsy, lupus, paraplegia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, colostomy, pulmonary hypertension, anemia, and hypertension. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #6 with intact cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, utilized an indwelling catheter and ostomy. Review of a physician order dated 01/01/24 at 5:15 P.M., revealed an order was initiated for STAT (immediately) laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify physician timely of critical laboratory blood testing results. This affected one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for laboratory blood testing. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/14/23, with the diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, epilepsy, lupus, paraplegia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, colostomy, pulmonary hypertension, anemia, and hypertension. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #6 with intact cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, utilized an indwelling catheter and ostomy. Review of a physician order dated 01/01/24 at 5:15 P.M., revealed an order was initiated for STAT (immediately) laboratory (labs) to include a complete blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) in a COVID positive environment and changed PPE after exposure. This had the potential to affect 11 (#57, #58, #60, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, and #69) non infected residents of the 12 residents on Resident #59's hall. The facility census was 69. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 08/28/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteomyelitis, respiratory failure, diabetes, heart disease and COVID-19. Review of physician orders for 12/23/23 for transmission based isolation due to COVID-19 positive diagnosis until 01/03/24. Observation and interview on 12/27/23 at 11:16 A.M., revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #191 walked into a COVID-19 positive Resident #59's room wearing only a leopard print surgical mask. Upon her exit, LPN #191 confirmed Resident #59 had tested positive for COVID-19 and confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights and providing care per personal preference. This affected two (#30 and #61) of three residents reviewed for call light responses. Facility census was 69. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 06/21/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, dysphasia, chronic pain, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assist for toileting transfers and mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 10/18/23 revealed resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to memory loss, mobility, and cognitive loss with interventions resident requires one to two person assist for repositioning and turning in bed, encourage use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to a dependent resident. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for assistance with care and treatment. The facility census was 69. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 06/21/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, dysphasia, chronic pain, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assist for toileting transfers and mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 10/18/23 revealed resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to memory loss, mobility, and cognitive loss with interventions resident requires one to two person assist for repositioning and turning in bed, encourage use of call light and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was self-administering medications was safely disposing of used syringes. This affected one (#27) of one resident who self-administers injectable medication. The facility identified nine residents (#4, #12, #20, #22, #26, #29, #33, and #35), who resided on the 200 hall, who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/22, with diagnosis including multiple sclerosis (MS). Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #27's physician's orders for October 2023 revealed an order for interferon beta-1b subcutaneous kit 0.3 milligram (mg) (used for treatment of MS) to be given every other day in the evening. Review of Resident #27's assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and not left at the beds side unattended. This affected one (#27) of one resident who self-administers injectable medication. The facility identified nine residents (#4, #12, #20, #22, #26, #29, #33, and #35), who resided on the 200 hall, who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 66. Finding include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/22, with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS) and history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #27's physician's orders for October 2023 revealed an order for interferon beta-1b subcutaneous kit 0.3 milligram (mg) (used for multiple sclerosis) to be given daily every other day in the evening and cefepime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health needs were appropriately addressed or monitored. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, severe without psychotic features. The resident was discharged on 06/10/23. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, showed minimal signs of depression and had no behaviors. The resident received antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, antibiotic, and opioid medications. Review of the care plan initiated on 05/01/23, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for depression with appropriate interventions. The care plan did not identify if the resident had suicidal ideations or history of suicide attempts. Review of the social service progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents with the exception of three (#38, #102, and #156) residents identified by the facility as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Observation and concurrent interview on 09/11/23 beginning at 8:20 A.M., during a tour of the kitchen with interim Dietary Manager (DM) #341, revealed seven cucumbers in the walk-in refrigerator were uncovered on a metal pan, and the cucumbers had soft spots and a white substance on them. DM #341 touched the cucumbers and verified the white substance was mold, removed the pan, and stated the cucumbers would be thrown away. Additional observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed an opened three pound container of apple pie filling, dated 08/02/23, and approximately half-full. Observation of the container with DM #341 revealed no indication of a use by date after opening. DM #341…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference to be transferred to bed. This affected one (#38) of one residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), type II diabetes, chronic viral hepatitis C, atherosclerosis, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bed mobility and total dependence for locomotion, toileting, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care reviewed 07/12/23, revealed Resident #38 had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directives for code status were consistent throughout the medical record. This affected one (#25) of nine residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed and admission date of 09/06/19. Diagnoses included a contusion of the head, cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type two, dysphagia, chronic pain, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #25 was cognitively impaired. Review of the plan of care last revised 08/04/23 revealed Resident #25 established a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) advanced directive meaning no life-saving measures would be implemented in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Review of a physician order dated 09/06/23 revealed Resident #25 had and order for a DNRCC code status. Review of a divider tab in Resident #25's paper chart revealed a hand written note which indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident dependent for care received assistance with shaving and nail care. This affected one (#38) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), type II diabetes, chronic viral hepatitis C, atherosclerosis, and acquired absence of left leg above knee. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and total dependence for locomotion, toileting, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care reviewed 07/12/23 revealed Resident #38 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident. This affected one (#38) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), type II diabetes, chronic viral hepatitis C, atherosclerosis, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bed mobility and required total dependence for locomotion, toileting, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #38 was assessed as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's tube feeding was administered per physician order. This affected one (#38) of one residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), type II diabetes, chronic viral hepatitis C, atherosclerosis, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, required and total dependence for locomotion, toileting, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #38 was assessed with a feeding tube and received 51 percent (%) or more of total calories through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to timely respond to a request for pain medication changes. This affected one (#11) of one residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/20 and a readmission date of 05/16/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), alcoholic cirrhosis, pulmonary hypertension, chronic cystitis without hematuria, spondylosis, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, gout, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had frequent pain and was on scheduled pain medication. Review of the plan of care, reviewed 09/12/23, revealed Resident #11 had pain related to osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, gout, spondylosis, and thoracic and lumbar hernia. Interventions included to administer analgesia per physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician in a timely manner. This affected one (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, chronic kidney disease stage III, muscle weakness, essential (primary) hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, major depressive disorder peripheral vascular disease, acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician order dated 11/12/22 revealed Resident #14 was prescribed the antihistamine Allegra allergy tablet 180 milligram (mg) to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for itching. Review of the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, resident guardian interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely dental care. This affected one (#26) of one residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/24/23. Diagnoses included other intervertebral disc degeneration lumbosacral region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), spinal stenosis, adult failure to thrive, osteoarthritis, hypertension depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and alcohol abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with personal care, and had no mouth or facial pain, no discomfort, or difficulty with chewing. Review of a plan of care intervention revised 06/23/23 revealed Resident #26 had oral and dental health problems related to the natural…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure substitutions of similar nutritional value were offered timely to residents. This affected one (#18) of one residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 09/12/23 at 11:05 A.M., of lunch service revealed a meal of fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, and green beans was being served. Each resident had a meal ticket which indicated allergies and preferences. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #260 reviewed each meal ticket as the meal was plated. DC #260 plated one serving of fried chicken and one serving of mashed potatoes and gravy for Resident #18. Interview at this time with DC #260 stated Resident #18 did not like green beans. Continued observation revealed the meal was placed on a tray, covered, and placed on the cart to be delivered to Resident #18's room. Interview with DC #260 at the time of the observation confirmed there was no vegetable substitution available for Resident #18. DC #260 stated she had no idea of a resident's likes or dislikes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccinations were offered and administered per recommendations. This affected two (#33 and #34) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acquired absence of left great toe and right leg above knee, type two diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 07/17/23 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. According to the assessment, Resident #33 was up to date with the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the vaccine record dated 09/14/23 revealed Resident #33 last had the Pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate tube feeding orders were implemented. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility identified four residents who received tube feedings. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/22, a readmission date of 12/30/22, and a discharge date of 07/31/23. Diagnoses included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, dysphagia, dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and received 51% or more of total calories through tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-06-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the daily posted staffing information, review of staff time cards, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was present for eight consecutive hours in the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 76. Findings include:Review of the daily posted staffing information dated 06/06/26 revealed one Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled to work 5.25 hours. A second RN with administrative duties was scheduled to work 7.5 hours. Review of the employee timecard dated 06/06/26 for RN #354 revealed a start time of 6:40 A.M. and an ending time of 12:12 P.M. Review of the handwritten and unsigned employee timecard dated 06/06/26 for the former RN#513 revealed a start time of 1:00 A.M. and an ending time of 2:15 A.M. then another start time of 7:00 P.M. and an ending time of 11:00 P.M. Further review of the timecards revealed no other RNs worked on 06/06/26 and no RN worked for eight consecutive hours. Interview on 06/15/26 at 12:32 P.M., the Administrator verified there was not an RN working in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, in-service record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of preventative and corrective action measures after a verbal abuse allegation was substantiated including staff education. This has the potential to affect 69 of 69 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the SRI investigation dated 12/11/23 revealed State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #250 had been providing Resident #30 care when she came out of resident's room and in the doorway made a comment that she was not going to clean Resident #30's fat butt. Several staff were at the nursing station and overheard the comment and staff informed management who pulled STNA #250 off the floor, asked her what happened, sent her home, and suspended her pending the outcome of the investigation. After speaking with Resident #30 and the witness staff members, the facility determined the incident did happen and they substantiated the allegation of verbal abuse and terminated STNA #250. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/31/2024
MARX, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2024
PRUITT, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2024
MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
POINT PLACE OH HEALTH & REHAB REALTY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
BISCHOFF, EMILYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ALEXANDER, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
REWA, ANGELAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RUSSELL, ROBERTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
SHATROV, ANZHELIKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WOLFE, ERICIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 4%Other / private 15%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,794per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366039. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next