No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

MAJESTIC CARE

Ownership rollup across 22 nursing homes in 3 states: Indiana, Michigan, Ohio. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.5 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.6 stars below the ~3.1 average of the 3 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It is improving: across the same 22 homes rated throughout, the average rose 0.86 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

22
Homes in this chain
2,604
Certified beds118 per home on average
76%
Occupied1,992 residents a day across 2,604 beds
+0.86
Star changeacross the 22 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
3
States covered
2.5
Average CMS rating~3.1 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.1 of 522 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing1.7 of 522 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures4.5 of 522 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

4 with immediate-jeopardy citations1 with an abuse flag7 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$41.3M
Related-party expensesummed across 22 homes · FY2023 cost reports
16%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 22 homes reporting both figures
+2.4%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 22 homes with a cost report
$605K
Total federal fines7 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 76%Medicare 6%Other / private 18%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 22 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Majestic Care Of Jefferson PointeFort Wayne, IN 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Saint AnthonyCrown Point, IN 1 of 5
Majestic Care of FlushingFlushing, MI 1 of 5$140,142 fined
Majestic Care Of Point PlaceToledo, OH 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Majestic Care Of AvonAvon, IN 2 of 5
Majestic Care Of CarmelCarmel, IN 2 of 5
Majestic Care Of North VernonNorth Vernon, IN 2 of 5
Majestic Care Of Cedar Village.Mason, OH 2 of 5$62,205 fined
Majestic Care Of Fairfield LLCFairfield, OH 2 of 5
Majestic Care Of KentKent, OH 2 of 5
Majestic Care Of Middletown LLCMiddletown, OH 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $108,164 fined
Majestic Care Of PerrysburgPerrysburg, OH 2 of 5
Majestic Care of ClydeClyde, OH 2 of 5Abuse flag
Majestic Care Of SouthportIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5
Majestic Care of Battle CreekBattle Creek, MI 3 of 5
Majestic Care of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $139,006 fined
Majestic Care Of New LexingtonNew Lexington, OH 3 of 5
Majestic Care Of WhitehallWhitehall, OH 3 of 5
Majestic Care Of West AllenFort Wayne, IN 4 of 5$21,645 fined
Majestic Care Of SheridanSheridan, IN 5 of 5
Majestic Care Of Toledo SNFToledo, OH 5 of 5$22,432 fined
Majestic Care of Columbus LLCColumbus, OH 5 of 5$111,283 fined
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.