Majestic Care Of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive, Mason, OH 45040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 162 certified beds · (513) 754-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $62,205 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 49.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.90 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.7%CMS range 47.0–68.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.6–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.3–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 153.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infections for a pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual harm when Resident #20 ' s weekly skin assessments were not completed and subsequently led to hospitalization for a wound infection and possible osteomyelitis. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date to the facility on [DATE] and a discharge date to the hospital on [DATE], and as of 04/16/24 Resident #20 is still hospitalized . Resident #20 had a hospital diagnosis of right large heel pressure ulcer with wet necrosis with suspected superimposed infection/osteomyelitis. The resident had pertinent diagnoses of cellulitis of right upper limb, atherosclerotic heart disease of native…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at appropriate and safe temperatures. This had the potential to affect 149 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#02 and #03) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Observation on 06/10/26 at 7:49 A.M. revealed a large pan of individually scooped and covered plastic cups sitting on the counter in the tray line area. There was no ice nor any other method used to keep the contents cold. Further observation revealed the pan of plastic cups remained in the tray line area through the entire tray line service. Interview at the same time, Dietary Aid (DA) #690 stated the plastic cups contained yogurt. Review of a test tray on 06/10/26 at 9:32 A.M., after all residents had been served, revealed the eggs were 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the yogurt was 64 degrees F. Interview at the time of the observation Director of Nutrition and Food Service (DNFS) #605 verified the eggs were 110…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, the facility failed to prepare, serve, and store food in a manner to prevent against the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 149 rresidents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#02 and #03) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 151. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/08/26 at 12:49 P.M. revealed a cart, which contained approximately 25 cups of juices, in the hallway in front of the nurse station of the [NAME] unit, the cups of juice were covered with several loose paper towels. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #410 and #630 were observed taking cups of juice off the cart, placing them on resident lunch trays, and carrying the trays down the hall with the juice cups uncovered, to deliver to resident rooms. Interview on 06/08/26 at 12:50 P.M., CNA # 410 verified the cups of juice were covered with paper towels in the hallway and were not being covered once removed from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to consider and timely resolve resident concerns. This affected twelve residents who regularly attended resident council meetings. The facility census was 151. Findings include: During the Resident Council discussion task on 06/10/2026 at 10:30 A.M., with three residents (#01, #62 and #79) revealed the Administrator attended and ran the Resident Council meetings and the residents felt their concerns were not addressed. The residents reported there was no follow-up to the concerns and issues brought up in the meetings were never included in the following meetings with information on resolution. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for the from May 2025 through May 2026, revealed no documented old business and no documented evidence of discussion or resolutions to concerns which had been brought up. During an interview on 06/11/26 at 9:28 A.M., Activity Director (AD) #315 stated the Administrator ran the meetings and documented the minutes. AD #315 stated there should be documented evidence of the residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain environmental temperature at a comfortable level on the Apple nursing unit. This affected six residents (#1, #71, #108, #114, #130, and #6) and had the potential to affect all 24 residents residing on the Apple nursing unit. The facility census was 151.Observation during facility tour on 06/11/26 between 5:46 P.M. and 6:20 P.M. with Maintenance Director #200 revealed the Apple nursing unit main corridor was 84.9 degrees Fahrenheit, Apple dining room was 89.8 degrees Fahrenheit, resident room for Resident #1 was 84.7 degrees Fahrenheit, Resident # 71 was 85.6 degrees Fahrenheit, Resident #108 was 83.3 degrees Fahrenheit, Residents #114 and #130 was 84.4 degrees Fahrenheit, and Resident #6 was 84.4 degrees Fahrenheit. All temperatures were taken and verified by Maintenance Director #200 who utilized the facility's infrared thermometer. Interviews on 06/11/26 between 5:46 P.M. and 6:14 P.M. with Residents #6, #108 and #114 revealed it was terribly hot.Interview on 06/11/26 at 6:14 P.M. with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report concerns for misappropriation to the State Agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #55) of three residents sampled for abuse. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified kidney disease, chronic pain syndrome, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact, had verbal behaviors, did not wander, and occasionally rejected care. Review of document titled (Resident #55)- Interview/Investigation, Missing $30, not dated, revealed Resident #55 informed the Administrator that $30.00 was missing from under the lamp in his room. The resident stated he had 25 one-dollar bills and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine dental services. This affected two (Resident #12 and Resident #55) of two residents sampled for dental services. The facility census was 151. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary embolism, paranoid schizophrenia, mild vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, and unspecified seizures. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #12 had adequate vision and did not use corrective lenses. Review of care plan dated 02/03/25 revealed Resident #12 has oral/dental health problems due to missing teeth and history of mouth pain. Interventions included administering medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide quarterly screening for therapy services. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents sampled for therapy services. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic diastolic heart failure, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified chronic kidney disease, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and frequently rejected care. Review of care plan dated 09/28/25 revealed Resident #7 required assistance with (activities of daily living) ADL's. Interventions included assisting with ADLs as needed, encouraging resident to participate to the fullest extent, and for therapy to screen routinely,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff was qualified to complete resident care. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the employee record for Nursing Assistant (NA) #540 revealed a hire date of 11/23/24 as a NA. Further review of NA #540's employee record revealed the staff member had not completed the state test to be a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Review of the Detailed Hours Report with Training Category and Pay Category dated 08/14/25 revealed CNA #540 worked 11/28/25 through 04/18/25 as a CNA. Interview on 08/14/25 at 11:54 A.M. with Human Resource #434 confirmed NA #540 was hired on 01/23/24 as a NA for both assisted living and long-term care. Interview also confirmed when NA #540 was hired, she had completed the course for the CNA program but had not passed her state test. Interview also confirmed NA #540 worked for [NAME] Care of Cedar Village on 11/28/24 and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pests. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Initial tour completed on 08/13/25 from 8:28 A.M. through 8:50 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed four dinner trays dated 08/12/25 were setting on the tables in the Gardenia dining area. Gnats were present on the trays and flying around the trays. There was two trays located on the windowsill in the Gardenia dining area. One of the trays had a couple gnats on the food, the other tray had approximately twenty ants on the plate and food. Observation of the Apple unit dining area had three dinner trays dated 08/12/25 with gnats on the food and gnats flying above the food. Observation on the Peach unit dining area had two trays dated 08/12/25 with gnats on the food of one of the trays. The DON was present during observation and confirmed the presence of gnats and ants on food and food dishes in the dining areas on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene after removing soiled incontinent brief and before donning new gloves. This affected one (#104) out of three residents observed for incontinence care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a way to avoid transmission of communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility staff touched resident medications with their bare hands when administering medications and failed to clean a multi resident blood glucometer between residents. This affected three (#125, #139, and #140) out of three residents observed for medications/glucometer checks. Lastly, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for resident dining and storage of medications in the medication cart. This had the potential to affect the 26 residents residing on the Peach Unit. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #104…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was available and administered according to physicians' orders. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to irritable bowel syndrome, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the plan of care for Resident #3 dated 07/19/24 revealed resident has potential nutritional risk related to congestive heart failure, congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, anemia and abnormal labs. Interventions include laboratory tests as ordered, medications as ordered, registered dietician to evaluate and make diet recommendations as needed. Review of the physician orders for Resident #3 revealed an order dated folic acid, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, 4-50-2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 133 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility identified four residents (#8, #40, #60 and #122) as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 137. Findings include: During an observation of the kitchen on 08/15/24, a large swarm of small flying insects were observed around two boxes of exposed potatoes stored in the open, under a window and another directly adjacent in the vicinity of the ice machine. Interview on 08/15/24 at 9:25 A.M. with the Director of Nutritional and Food Services #600 confirmed the presence of the flying insects and stated the potatoes should not be stored in this manner. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156079.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were less than 5% when they administered incorrect medications for Resident #30 and Resident #75 and failed to administer a medication for Resident #75. This affected two Residents (#30 and #75) of three Residents reviewed for medication administration. There was three errors out of 26 opportunities for a medication error of 11.5%. The facility census was 132. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 07/23/18 with pertinent diagnoses of: hypertensive heart disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, left ventricular failure, unspecified vitamin deficiency, and unspecified nutritional deficiency. Review of a Physicians Order dated 04/08/24 Calcium Carbonate Vitamin D-Mineral Oral Tablet 600-400 milligrams (mgs)-unit (Calcium Carbonate-Vitamin D with Minerals). Give one tablet by mouth two times a day for supplement. Observation of a medication administration pass on 04/10/24 at 8:25 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen area, failed to properly store food, failed to maintain an effective pest control program and failed to maintain a current food service license. This affected all residents in the facility except three (Residents #26, #81, #236) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 136. Findings include: 1 Review of the facility's food service license on 03/25/24 at 8:23 A.M. revealed it had expired on 03/01/24. During an interview on 03/27/23 at 4:10 P.M., a representative from the local health department verified the facility failed to renew their food service license. 2. During observations on 03/25/24 at 8:23 A.M., there was food splatter and debris up and down the kitchen wall at the hand wash sink. There was debris caked on the plate warmer and down the front of the ice machine. Walk in refrigerator #01 contained a large metal pan of scrambled eggs with no label, eight large metal cookie sheets with cookies and no label, two large cookie sheets with four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care conferences were held quarterly. This affected three (Residents #109, #107, and #12) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The census was 136. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the care plans for Resident #109 revealed no documentation a care plan conference was held between 01/11/23 and 12/27/23. During an interview on 03/27/24 at 3:01 P.M., Resident #109 stated he could not remember when his last care conference was held, but it had been a while back. 2. Record review revealed Resident #107 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the care plans for Resident #107 revealed no documentation a care plan conference had been held between 09/16/22 and 03/28/24. During an interview on 03/28/24 at 8:56 A.M., Resident #107 stated she has never attended a care plan conference since her admission to the facility. 3. Record review revealed Resident #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to initiate a requested room change for a resident. This affected one (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for room change. The facility census was 136. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and other specified depressive episodes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/05/24, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, had no functional limitations and was dependent for toileting, bathing, transfers and dressing. During an interview on 03/25/24 at 12:52 P.M., Resident #18 stated her roommate screams all night. She had asked for a room change but has not received one. She stated a month ago she reported a complaint about her roommate being in her bed when she came back to the room. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed ensure resident equipment was in good repair and failed to keep the dining room clean. This affected six (Residents #29, #62, #67, #94 #107, and #121) residents. The facility census was 136. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 03/26/24 at 1:01 P.M. the arm rests and seat on the over the toilet chair in Resident # 29's were torn in several places. Some of the tears were covered with tape. The chair arms had several ripped and torn areas that were not covered, and the taped areas had rough edges on them. During an interview at the time of the observation, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #18 confirmed the above findings. 2. During an observation on 03/25/24 at 11:28 A.M., Resident #62's mattress was too small for the bed. There was a two foot gap between he top of the bed frame and the mattress at the head of the bed. Resident #62 stated at the time of the observation he has asked for a new mattress on several occasions and each time is told it is on order. During interview on 03/26/24 at 12:24 P.M. with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of hospital records, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #337) of one resident reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 136. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #337 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 03/18/24. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other hyperlipidemia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, spinal stenosis, bipolar disorder, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and depression. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/01/24, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition. This resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #337) of one resident reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 136. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #337 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 03/18/24. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other hyperlipidemia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, spinal stenosis, bipolar disorder, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and depression. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/01/24, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition. This resident was assessed to require supervision for eating and oral hygiene, maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a valid Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for residents. This affected two (Residents #55 and #124) of three residents reviewed for PASARR status. The facility census was 136. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 03/01/22. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified and bipolar ii disorder. Review of the PASARR assessments revealed an assessment was completed on 03/01/22 for a less than 30 day stay and another assessments was completed on 05/23/23 for a stay more than 30 days. During an interview on 03/28/24 at 1:29 P.M., Social Service Director #717 confirmed the PASARR was not completed timely once Resident #55 stayed past 30 days. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #124 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia unspecified severity with other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the faciltiy failed to serve residents their preferred food items. This affected three (Residents #38, #70, and #72) of three residents reviewed for meal preferences. Ths facility census was 136. Findings include: Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed on 12/28/23 residents complained about not getting the items listed on their meal tickets. On 02/23/24 residents again complianed the meals did not match what is on the meal tickets that they filled out. During an observation on 03/27/24 at 9:12 A.M., Resident #38's meal ticket had her food choices as grapes, orange slices, skim milk, eggs with cheese on them and corn flakes cereal. Observation of Resident #28's breakfast tray revealed she received received strawberries, two percent milk, eggs without cheese and no cereal. During an observation on 03/27/24 at 9:20 A.M., Resident #70's meal ticked had his food choices as scrambled eggs and orange juice. He received fried eggs and cranberry juice. During an observaiton on 03/27/24 at 9:32 A.M., Resident #72's meal ticket…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, facility policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant errors. This affected one (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 139. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/03/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side, respiratory failure, hypertensive heart disease, and type two diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact. Review of a Medication Error Report dated 09/09/23 revealed Resident #51 received the following medications in error, that were prescribed for Resident #141: Metoprolol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed ensure to ensure medications were disposed of, if out dated and not in circulation for resident use. This had the potential to affect 143 of 143 residents who resident in the facility. The census was 143. Findings include: Observations on [DATE] at 2:13 P.M. of the [NAME] unit medication room with Registered Nurse (RN) #177 revealed an open multi-dose vial of tuberculin purified protein testing solution with the expiration date of 02/22 with no date when opened. Interview with RN #177, at the time of the observation, revealed the multi-dose vial of tuberculin purified protein testing solution should have a date when opened and was good for 28 days after opened. Observations on [DATE] at 2:45 P.M. of Peachtree unit medication room revealed an open multi-dose vial of Lidocaine 1% injectable 200 milligram (mg)/20 milliliter (ml) with no date when opened, two boxes of over the counter Simethacone 125 mg chewable tabs with an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the housekeeping procedure manual, the facility failed to maintain residents' rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected nine residents (#25, #39, #40, #60, #79, #81, #106, #136, and #141) out of 26 residents residing in the Redbud building. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Observation on 06/07/21 at 2:16 P.M., revealed Resident #106 floors not swept and mopped. Paper, Kleenex, and dirt on dark colored carpet floors. Observation on 06/08/21 at 10:39 A.M., revealed Resident #40 room had balled up tissues around her bed with noticeable crumbs and food particles on the dark carpet. Observation on 06/09/21 at 2:30 P.M., revealed Resident #141's carpet consisted of food particles scattered on the floor. Interview on 06/09/21 at 2:30 P.M., with Resident #141 reported he has not seen housekeeping in days. Observation on 06/09/21 at 2:35 P.M., revealed Resident #81 had sugar packets, napkins, and Kleenexes balled up on the floor under the bed. There were paper and crumbs scattered on the dark colored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide baths/showers to residents depended on staff for care. This affected four (#34, #25, #106, and #141) of six residents sampled for activity of daily living. The facility census was 143 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #34 medical record revealed an admission date 03/25/21, with diagnoses including muscle spasm, peripheral vertigo of left ear, phlebitis and thrombophlebitis of other deep vessels of lower extremity, weakness, urinary tract infection, spinal stenosis of cervical region, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, pain, anemia, insomnia, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no rejection of care and required total one person assist with bathing. Review of the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain the resident dining rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected 15 residents (#14, #15, #25, #27, #39, #40, #48, #60, #79, #81, #103, #106, #110, #116, and #136) residing in the Redbud building and the potential to affect any resident that could eat in the Peach Tree dining room. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Observation on 06/07/21 at 10:51 A.M., revealed the Red [NAME] Terrace Dining Room floors had red stains on the floors, food particles scattered and spread throughout the dining room, and the base of tables were covered with dirt and crumbs. Observation on 06/09/21 at 3:15 P.M., revealed the Red [NAME] Terrace Dining Room contained dirt, debris and food crumbs on the floor. There were 11 tables with base and all of the base were covered with dirt, debris and food crumbs. Interview on 06/09/21 at 3:20 P.M., with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #150 revealed she has not seen housing keeping at all today. STNA #150 was scheduled for 7:00 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to eradicate flying insects (gnats) in resident care areas. This affected 24 residents who reside on Apple unit on the third floor and 18 residents who reside on the [NAME] unit on the second floor. The facility census 143. Findings included: Observations on 06/08/21 at approximately 4:00 P.M., a gnat was observed and killed in the first floor board room. Observation on 06/09/21 at 8:55 A.M., a gnat was observed flying down the hall outside the [NAME] soiled utility room and confirmed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #147. Observation on 06/09/21 at 2:59 P.M., a gnat was seen on the third floor Apple unit flying near nursing station and confirmed by Registered Nurse #129. Review of the facility pest control log revealed Pest control dated 09/04/20 revealed rooms 241, 262, 263, 236 233, and 232 were treated for small flies. On 09/17/20, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were treated for small flies. On 09/29/20, room [ROOM NUMBER] was treated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Foley catheter bag was covered for privacy. This affected one (#34) of one sampled resident, of six residents with indwelling Foley catheters. The facility census was 143 residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/25/21, with diagnoses that included muscle spasm, weakness, history of urinary tract infection, spinal stenosis of cervical region and neurogenic bladder. The admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no rejection of care and indwelling Foley catheter. The plan of care dated 04/06/2021 revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder. Observations on 06/07/21 at 12:23 P.M., in the Apple Grove dining room revealed Resident #34 seated in a wheelchair with an uncovered Foley catheter drainage bag attached to the wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide eyeglasses daily to a resident dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. This affected one (#25) of one resident sampled for vision. The census was 143. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 07/27/18 with diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/23/21, revealed Resident #25 was assessed being severely cognitively impaired. Resident #25 have adequate vision with glasses and is dependent for all activity of daily living. Review nursing notes revealed no concerns with refusing to wear eyeglasses. Observation on 06/07/21 at 2:32 P.M., 06/09/21 at 12:01 P.M., revealed Resident #25 was sitting in room trying to watch television. Observations on 06/14/21 at 11:50 A.M., revealed Resident #25 was not wearing eyeglasses. Interview on 06/14/21 at 11:55 A.M., with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #87, the STNA assigned to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders. A total of 25 opportunities with two errors which resulted in a 8 percent medication error rate. This affected one (#114) of five residents observed during medication administration. Facility census was 143 residents. Findings include: Observations of Medication Administration on 06/09/21 at 8:19 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #147 revealed Resident #114 was to receive Timoptic 0.5% ophthalmic solution one drop in right eye and Systane Balance (propylene glycol) 0.6 percent drops one drop in the left eye for the treatment of glaucoma to prevent a rise in intraocular pressure. LPN #147 place one drop of Timoptic 0.5% ophthalmic solution in Resident #114's left eye and started to put one drop of lantanoprost 0.005 percent drops into Resident #114's right eye when the nurse was stopped for clarification. Record review revealed Resident #114 had a physician order dated 05/11/21 for Timoptic 0.5% ophthalmic solution one drop in right eye to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to correctly transcribe physician admission orders which resulted in residents not getting the prescribed medication. This affected one (#114) of five residents observed during medication administration. Facility census was 143 residents. Findings include: Observations of Medication Administration on 06/09/21 at 8:19 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #147 revealed Resident #114 was to receive Timoptic 0.5% ophthalmic solution one drop in right eye and Systane Balance (propylene glycol) 0.6 percent drops one drop in the left eye for the treatment of glaucoma to prevent a rise in intraocular pressure. LPN #147 place one drop of Timoptic 0.5% ophthalmic solution in Resident #114's left eye and started to put one drop of lantanoprost 0.005 percent drops into Resident #114's right eye when the nurse was stopped for clarification. Record review revealed Resident #114 had a physician order dated 05/11/21 for Timoptic 0.5%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect when a staff member made an inappropriate comment to a resident. This affected one Resident (#130) of one reveiwed for respect. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #274 revealed an admission of 01/06/20 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular attack (stroke) with paralysis to the left side. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. Interview with Resident #274 on 01/27/20 at 11:45 A.M. revealed a State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #140 told him a few days ago in the dining room in front of the other residents, when he complained of pain in his leg, the STNA told him they would have to cut his left off. He revealed he though the commend was rude. Interview with STNA #140 on 01/27/20 at 4:46 P.M. denied she said we will have to cut your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received a performance review at least every 12 months. This affected four (State Tested Nursing Assistants [STNA] #18, #50, #2 and #751) of four STNA personnel records reviewed. Findings include: 1. STNA #18 was hired on 11/18/02. STNA #18 did not have an annual performance review for the period of 11/18/22 to 11/18/23. 2. STNA #50 was hired on 09/11/19. STNA #50 did not have an annual performance review for the period of 09/11/22 to 09/11/23. 3. STNA #2 was hired on 05/18/21. STNA #2 did not have an annual performance review for the period of 05/18/22 to 05/18/23. 4. STNA #751 was hired on 02/11/02. STNA #751 did not have an annual performance review for the period of 02/11/23 to 02/11/24. During an interview on 03/28/24 at 1:59 P.M., Human Resources Manager #62 confirmed annual performance reviews were not completed for STNA #18, STNA #50, STNA #2 and STNA #751 during their most recent anniversary year.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$62,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $62,205 — penalty dated 2024-04-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-15 for 22 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAJESTIC CARE OF CEDAR VILLAGE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/11/2022 |
| PRUITT, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| CEDAR VILLAGE HEALTH PROPERTY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| LOUFMAN, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MARX, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| REWA, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2023 |
| RUSSELL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SHATROV, ANZHELIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| WOLFE, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| CEDAR VILLAGE HEALTH PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL LIMITED | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.