Majestic Care of Livonia
28550 Five Mile Road, Livonia, MI 48154 · For profit - Corporation · 142 certified beds · (734) 427-8270 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $139,006 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.3% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.1% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 13.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.8%CMS range 37.8–85.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.7–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 13.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 95.5 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100143712. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide monitoring, supervision and door alarm response to prevent the elopement of one (R901) of six residents reviewed for elopement, who was a known elopement risk and wore a Wanderguard (ankle bracelet used to set off an alarm restricting a resident from walking out the door). R901 eloped from the facility on 03/25/24 at 9:10 PM unbeknownst to staff until 5:15 AM on 03/26/24. R901 was located in the community approximately 12 miles away from the facility at 1:30 AM on 03/29/24. R901 was able to exit the facility, triggering the alarm system wearing a Wanderguard without staff being aware for appoximately eight hours. R901 was outside without food, medication, shelter or heat in a heavy traffic area and reportedly was sleeping in abandoned houses on nights when temperature ranged from 23 to 45 degrees farenheight wearing only a jogging suit and open-faced sandals with socks. R901 was located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00145744. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely treatments for a newly identified wound for one resident (R701) out of three reviewed for wounds, resulting in the worsening of the wound. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R701 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, and Adult Failure to Thrive. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R701 also required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the initial skin assessment dated [DATE] noted that R701 did not have any identified skin conditions. Further review of the progress notes revealed the following, -1/14/2024 .Wound-Resident has a dime size open area to [their] sacrum (buttocks), writer cleansed area with normal saline, applied triad paste and a border gauze. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00140358. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatments as ordered for one resident (R802) of three reviewed for care and treatment, resulting in the potential for worsening of existing pressure ulcers and/or development of new wounds. Findings Include: A review of the Intake revealed, The complainant states the resident wasn't getting proper wound care and [R802] was sent to hospital in [date] due to the condition of [their] wounds. On 10/31/2023 at 11:55 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the complainant. The complainant stated that R802 was not receiving proper care while in facility. They stated that R802 had several pressure sores and were not receiving care. A review of the medical record revealed that R802 admitted into the facility on 4/26/2022 with the following diagnoses, Anorexia and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-10-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00136917, MI00134758, MI00140155 and MI00137068. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and wellbeing for five residents (R1, R8, R10, R25 and R93) out of four reviewed for abuse, to prevent physical abuse from a resident who had unpredictable behaviors and a staff member, resulting in physical abuse, bodily injuries, and psychosocial distress. Findings include: Resident 8 A review of a Facility Reported Incident dated 5/9/2023 revealed the following, Incident Summary: [R254] was observed collaring up (to hold someone so they cannot move) roommate [R8]. Residents were immediately separated. [R254] was placed on 1:1 and sent out for psychiatric observation. [R8] had a small scratch to left forearm, no adverse reactions. Further review of R8's progress notes revealed the following, 5/9/2023 11:04 Alert Note: Resident was involved in an incident where the roommate was the aggressor and came out the restroom and just attacked [them].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate cross-connection prevention resulting in the potential for contamination of ice in the ice machine, affecting all residents. Findings include:On 2/24/26 at 2:30 PM Observed Station 2 pantry ice machine drain line submerged into the pump reservoir without the required air gap to protect the ice.When interviewed during this observation about the required air gap to protect the ice, the Maintenance Director (MD) M said this would be put on the maintenance task list and corrected.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2617467Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse a shower and treated the resident with respect for one resident (R25) of two residents reviewed for the right to a dignified existence. Findings include:A review of a complaint called into the State Agency revealed on 9/5/25 R25, after refusing, was allegedly forced to shower from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K.On 2/25/26 at 10:00 AM, R25 was observed in their room watching television. R25 was able to respond to basic questions by nodding their head and saying yes although there were notable speech difficulties as evident by mumbled speech related to diagnosis of Down Syndrome. R25 was interviewed about alleged shower incident on 9/5/25. When asked about taking showers, R25 shook their head yes and mumbled some unintelligible words, unable to give specific information about incident and what happened. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely submit an MDS (Minimum Data Set) resident assessment for one resident (R77) of one reviewed for resident assessment. Findings include:A review of the surveys facility's task noted, R77's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was triggered for being 120 days overdue. On [DATE] at 2:41 PM, the MDS Coordinator, Licensed Practical Nurse I (LPN I) was asked about R77's overdue assessment and reported, R77 died at the facility and would look to see why it's overdue.A review of R77's medical record progress note revealed, [DATE] 11:19 (PM) General Progress Note Text: @ (at) 9:50am Aide went to give care and notice COC [change of condition) of resident and nurse was notified . @10:31am paramedic called hospital (hospital Physician) pronounced time of death @10:31am .Further review of R77's medical record revealed, R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], then discharged /expired on [DATE]. R77's primary diagnosis was noted as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes 2728688 and 2728168. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely care was provided to meet the needs for five residents (R2, R36, R63, R75, R98) of 19 whose care was reviewed. Findings include: R2 On 02/24/2026 at 10:23 AM, R2 and a family member via the phone, reported on the afternoon and night shifts there are times their call light was on more than thirty minutes without being answered. R2 and the family member noted there is a camera in the room for recording. R2 played a video of empty hallways in the late afternoon and nighttime hours. When the call light is not answered R2 may have to get up out of bed on their own. R2 was observed to be dressed and seated in a powered wheelchair and readily moved about the room and in and out of the room. A review of the record for R2 revealed R2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Right Sided Paralysis, Stroke and Heart Disease. The active care plan documented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion and follow up of Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) for two residents (R9 and R13) of five reviewed for Medication Regimen Reviews. Findings include:R9A review of R9's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified Psychosis, and Generalized Anxiety. Further review revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment and was independent for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R9's medical record revealed the following MRR recommendation on 1/14/26, Appropriate diagnosis for indication. Relevant Meds: Risperidone for Bipolar Disorder. Resident does not have listed diagnosis to support the use of these medications for bipolar disorder. Please review chart and add appropriate diagnosis in [electronic medical record] to support therapy. If no appropriate diagnosis exists, recommend discontinuing the medication. On 2/27/26, a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food to meet the preferences of two residents (R2, R98) of three reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: R98On 02/24/2026 at 10:07 AM, R98 reported the food was so so and the menu not really good. R98 reported sometime the cereal is hard and the oatmeal did not like regular oatmeal. R98 reported they had complained about the food and feels the food got worse. R98 further reported the alternate was not consistent they did not really like pork or beef. R98 was observed to have lunch in their room. On 02/26/2026 at 9:25 AM, R98 reported the oatmeal was grainy and not sweet enough. No butter was present on the tray. R98 had been served a croissant breakfast sandwich and reported it was hard. The croissant was hard to the touch on both halves and clanked on the plate when tapped. On 02/26/2026 at 10:02 AM, the Dietary Manager reported the eggs provided for the breakfast were liquid eggs formed into squares to accommodate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's record accurately reflected the resident's care for one resident (R8), of one reviewed. Findings include: A review of R8's medical record revealed the male resident was admitted into the facility on 3/8/23 with diagnoses of Unspecified Intercranial Injury, Anemia, and Hypertension. Further review revealed a severe cognitive impairment, and total dependence for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R8's medical record revealed the following progress note:9/18/2025 01:52 MD (medical doctor)/NP (nurse practitioner)/PA (physician assistant) Progress Note .Patient is seen and examined at the bedside, pleasant and calm, reports no discomfort or pain, and denies any unusual headaches, dizziness, chest pain, or SOB (shortness of breath). Patient is tracheostomy-dependent. Patient has a status for vaginal ultrasound since there is a possible endometrial CA (a type of cancer that begins as growth of cells in the uterus) .On 2/26/25 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the male…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00152612. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident prescribed controlled substance (narcotic) pain medication for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) noted an allegation, It was reported that there was a drug diversion. On 5/28/25 at 10:21 AM, R901 was observed lying in bed. R901 was asked about the care at the facility and had no complainants. R901 was then asked if they recalled the incident when their medication was reported missing. R901 stated, Yes. R901 was asked during that time if they went without their pain being treated. R901 stated, I don't remember. A reveiw of R901's medical record revealed, R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Metabolic Encephalopathy and End Stage Renal Disease. A review of R901's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment noted, R901 with an intact cognition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100149283. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete care plan revisions for one (R702) of three residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Review of complaint called into the State Agency (SA) revealed the facility reported an incident of brief inappropriate contact between R702 and R703 on 12/20/24 during which the interaction was reportedly directly witnessed by staff and staff were able to immediately redirect the residents without difficulty. Review of the facility record for R702 revealed an admission date of 09/20/24 with diagnoses including Dementia and Disorientation. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] was scored 7/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. R702's Care Plan revealed the addition of a Focus area addressing the resident's behavior that was initiated on 12/23/24 and states [R702] relationship-seeks and expresses the desire to find [their] dreamgirl or a wife. Can make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00148803. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) were provided for at least eight consecutive hours per day on the weekend days resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of emergent or routine care that could cause negative outcomes affecting all 90 residents in the facility. Findings include: Following a review of the nurses' schedule for 4 weeks in the months of November and December 2024, it was revealed there was no documented eight consecutive hours of RN coverage on December 7, 2024. On 12/10/2024 at 1:08 PM, during an interview, the scheduler staff (K) confirmed there was no RN on duty on 12/7/2024. On 12/10/2024 at 2:07 PM, during an email exchange, the Nursing Home Administrator explained they confirmed with the Director of Nursing (DON) that there was no RN coverage on 12/7/2024 and explained the scheduled RN could not work due to illness.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00148803. On 12/08/24 between 8:40 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was a pan of soup dated 11/26-12/3, an opened undated bag of breaded chicken, an undated bag of whole ham, an undated bag of sliced ham, an opened undated package of hot dogs, an undated pan of tomato sauce, a crate of fat free half pints of milk dated 12/7. In the Traulsen reach-in cooler, there was an opened undated 1 gallon container of Italian dressing, a 1 gallon container of sweet and sour sauce dated 9/13/24-10/13/24, a 1 gallon opened, undated container of BBQ sauce. On 12/8/24 at 12:05 PM, when queried about the opened, undated items, Dietary Manager I provided no explanation. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R86) of one resident reviewed, was referred to with dignity regarding potentially deogatory language. Findings Include: A review of the record for R86 revealed an order entered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B dated 03/07/24 which documented, Assist feeder for all meals. The record further documented R86 was admitted into the facility 02/27/24. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented, severely impaired cognition and substantial/maximal assistance for Activities of Daily Living. On 12/09/24 at 1:20 PM, LPN B was queried about the order and reported the order using the word feeder was not appropriate and should have read 'assist with all meals' or 'one to one assist with all meals'. On 12/10/24 at 11:52 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the term 'feeder' should not have been used. A review of the policy titled, Dignity dated 01/02/24 revealed, It is the practice of this facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated to reflect fall interventions for one sampled resident (R10) of three reviewed for accidents. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 9:10 AM, R10 was observed to sit on the side of their bed. R10 right eye was observed with a discolored ring around the lower part of the eye. R10 was asked about the bruise on their eye. R10 explained they fell out of bed while they were asleep. R10 explained they hit their face on the night stand and landed face down on the floor. The environment around R10's bed was observed with some clutter. R10 was asked if the facility put things in place to try and prevent them from falling out of bed again. R10 said they didn't think so. A review of R10's incident and accident reports noted three falls: on 07/1/24, 11/09/24 and 11/12/24, all three were due to self transfer. On 12/10/24 at 12:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if after each fall there was a review of the falls along with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for one (R8) of four residents reviewed for hygiene. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 9:16 AM, R8 was observed in bed and appeared not to be dressed or cleaned up for the morning. R8 was asked about daily care and any related concerns and reported they hadn't had a shower in over a month. R8 reported when they ask staff about having a shower they are told their shower days are on Monday and Thursday, but on those days nobody offers a shower or they are told it can't be done for some other reason. Review of the facility record for R8 revealed an original admission date of 09/10/22 diagnoses included Cardiac Arrest and Heart Failure. R8's Care Plan dated 11/27/24 indicated R8 was incontinent, non-ambulatory, and required assistance with bathing. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) and paper shower sheets from 11/03/24 to 11/25/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice Statement #1: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure lower extremity lymphedema wraps (elestic bandage wrap applied to reduce swelling) were applied for one (R72) of four residents reviewed for care. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 10:02 AM, R72 reported their legs hadn't been wrapped for edema for the past two days. R72's legs were visible, and no wraps were in place. Review of R72's facility record revealed an admission date of 07/29/22 with diagnoses included Heart Failure and Bilateral Lower Extremity Swelling. A physician order dated 12/3/24 documented: Wrap bilateral lower extremities with (name of elastic bandage) wrap daily and remove at HS (bedtime). Related to Lymphedema. On 12/09/24 at 1:20 PM, R72 was interviewed in their room. Their legs were visible and not wrapped. They were asked if their legs were ever wrapped yesterday or earlier today and they stated No. R72 reported they were concerned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply hand splints for one resident (R38) out of five residents reviewed for mobility and range of motion. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 8:55 AM, 10:14 AM, and at 11:31 AM, 1:14 PM, and 3:53 PM, R38 was observed lying in bed on their back sleeping with the head of the bed slightly elevated wearing a hospital gown. R38s hands appeared contracted. A hand splint was observed on the night stand. On 12/09/24 at 8:55 AM, R38 was observed lying their back in bed wearing a hospital gown with the head of the bed slightly elevated. The hand splint was observed in the same place on the night stand as previously observed. On 12/09/24 from 12:09 PM until 12/09/24 12:37 R38 was observed in their wheelchair in the dining room wearing a hand splint on their left hand and was observed eating with difficulty. A splint was not observed on their right hand. On 12/10/24 at 8:44 AM R38 was observed lying in bed on their back in bed with the head of the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient practice #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide tube feeding (TF-feeding supplied through a tube into the stomach) and hydration for one resident (R346) out of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 12/09/24 at 09:50 AM, 10:12 AM, 11:27 AM, and 3:54 PM, R346 was observed lying in bed. R346's TF bottle contained 400ml (milliliters) and was dated 12/8/24. The TF and water flush was not connected to R346 and was not infusing. On 12/10/24 at 08:51 AM R346 was observed being pushed back to their room in a wheelchair by an unidentified staff member. R346's TF bottle was still dated 12/8/24, still contained 400ml, and was still not infusing. A review of R346's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Acute and Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level); dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified; legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00148624. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions for a resident with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) to address triggers for one Resident (R44) of one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 1:00 p.m., R44 reported they had been dealing with their PTSD and felt upset recently, as the facility had attempted to involuntarily discharge them on 11/29/24. R44 revealed their involuntary discharge form, dated 11/29/24, which showed they refused to sign the form. R44 reported they had not been made aware prior of any discharge plan, and this resulted in a traumatic reaction for them. R44 explained they became escalated when they learned about the discharge plan, as they were being discharged to a homeless shelter. R44 stated they had a home before being admitted to the facility, and had given up their apartment when they became a long-term care resident. R44 reported after the (State) Ombudsman…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure biologicals were dated when opened in three of three medications carts reviewed. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 4:23 PM, the A medication cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D: a glucose test strips container was not dated when opened. On 12/08/24 at 4:26 PM, the D medication cart was observed with LPN A: A vial of Lantus insulin was open and undated; A vial of Humalog insulin was open and undated; A container of glucose test strips was not dated when opened; and two latanoprost eye droppers were not dated when opened. On 12/09/24 at 9:07 AM, the C medication cart was observed with LPN C: a Humalog insulin vial was not dated when opened; three artificial tears eye dropper vials were not dated when opened; and the glucose test strips container was not dated when opened. On 12/10/24 at 11:52 AM, during and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON reported glucose test strips and insulin vials should be dated when opened and glucose strips were good for thirty days once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a palatable (tasty), presentable manner for three Residents (R39, R45, and R246) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 12/08/24 at 9:22 a.m., R246 stated they were a newer resident to the facility, admitted on [DATE] for rehabilitation. R246 reported the food did not taste good, and there was little variety. R246 explained the alternates also did not taste good. R246 clarified food was their main concern, as they could barely eat their meals which was upsetting to them. R246 appeared thin in stature and was seated in a manual wheelchair. On 12/08/24 at 10:05 a.m., R45 stated, The food is horrible, and the eggs taste like they are powdered. When asked about alternatives available, R45 reported, The alternates taste horrible, and clarified the bread was old and hard when sandwiches were requested. R45 reported they felt frustrated by this and had reported their concerns to staff. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-allergenic food was provided for one Resident (R13) of one reviewed for food preferences. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at approximately 1:05 p.m., R13 reported they were served Shrimp [NAME] last night for dinner, which they were allergic to. R13 reported they believed it was Chicken [NAME] when the dinner was served. R13 reported they were chewing the meat and realized it was shrimp and spit it out immediately and asked a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) to call their nurse. R13 reported an aide was with them, CNA R, and their nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) S, who gave them Benadryl (an antihistamine medication for an allergic reaction). R13 reported they had a reaction when their mouth and tongue felt tingling. Review of R13's meal ticket, on 12/10/24 at 1:10 p.m., which was on their lunch meal tray, revealed, (R13) .Allergies: .Seafood . in large, bold print, at the top of their meal ticket. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statments. Deficient practice #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions (TBP) for one resident (R346) out of one reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: On 12/8/24 at 9:37 AM R346 was observed lying in bed. A sign was observed on R346's door revealed the following: CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the care of more than one person. Use dedicated or disposable equipment. Clean and disinfect reusable equipment before use on another person. R346 explained the sign is there because they have an infection in their dialysis access site. A review of R346's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00147513. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a known pressure wound was repositioned timely for one resident (R704) of six reviewed for skin care management. Findings include: On 10/16/24 at 10:52 AM, wound care for R704 was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) B. A pillow was removed from the side of R704 and placed at the top of the bed near R704's head. R704 was observed to have an open sacral pressure sore. The wound had a ruby colored base and drainage was noted on the dressing removed by LPN A. R704 was rolled side to side by the two staff during the care of the wound. Upon completion of the wound care the brief was changed and R704 was returned to a supine position on their backside around 11:15 AM. The head of the bed was raised to around twenty or thirty degrees and the pillow at the head was placed into R704's powered wheelchair. CNA B was asked about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00147416. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely brief change, peri-care and bedding change for one (R705) of four residents reviewed for care concerns. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 10:39 AM, R705 was interviewed while laying in bed. The incontinence pad under the resident was observed to be soaked with urine and there were clean linens and brief laying at the foot of the bed. Review of the facility record for R705 revealed an admission date of 01/26/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and Bilateral Lower Extremity Contracture. The Care Plan dated 09/05/24 identifies the focus area stating [R905] has episodes of incontinence of bladder and bowels and includes the goal statement [R905] will be maintained in as clean and dry and dignified a state as possible. The related interventions included Check routinely for incontinence and provide incontinence care as needed. On 10/15/24 at 11:59 AM, R905 was observed laying in bed. The incontinence pad had a large outer ring of dried urine and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00146915. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow hospital discharge instructions and orders for one sampled resident (R701) of one resident reviewed for continuum of care. Findings include: A review of Intake MI00146915 revealed the following, Patient was admitted to the hospital, oncologist very concerned as pt (patient) did not follow up for oncology treatment post dc (discharge) to [nursing facility] .Pt was to follow up to establish care and treatment plan . Appears that this did not occur which could further put patient at risk due to lack of treatment and care . A review of R701's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 8/1/24 with a diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma not having achieved remission. Further review revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, and required moderate to maximum assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R701's medical record revealed discharge instructions from the hospital: Follow up with [physician] Specialty: Medical Oncology, Internal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00146528 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after hospitalization for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for discharges. Findings include: A review of Intake: MI00146528 revealed the following, [R901] came to [local hospital] for evaluation, pt (patient) was cleared by physician and returned to [facility]. [Facility] indicated that they didn't receive clinical information, so they sent patient back to the Emergency Center. Staff called [facility] per pt., providing clinical clearance and they continued to refuse patient's return. The following day [hospital staff] contacted [facility administrator], he indicates that he cannot accept pt back as he doesn't have staff to care for patient. [Facility staff] sent clinical information to the building as requested. They requested a psychiatric evaluation, and this was conducted, this was sent to the facility as well, patient was cleared psychiatrically to return [facility administrator] continues to refuse to accept patient back to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145985. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the elopement of one resident (R700) of three reviewed for accidents and supervision. Findings include:: An incident and accident (I/A) report involving R700 was reviewed and revealed the following: Date: 7/25/24 23:22 (11:22 PM0 Incident Location: Outside. Incident Description: Nurse was informed by midnight staff that [R700] was not in [their] room or bed when [they] went to do rounds. Injuries Observed at Time of Incident: Injury Type: No injuries observed at time of incident. A progress note reviewed in R700's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following, 7/26/2024 00:49 (12:49 AM) Writer received call from charge nurse .stating that [R700] got out of the facility and an active code green (code used in potentially life threatening situations) was in place .Police [were] called. [R700] Returned to [the] facility with nurse, with no signs [or] symptoms of distress or injury. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00145599 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights to self- determination were honored for Leave of Absences (LOAs) potentially affecting all 95 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of Intake MI00145599 revealed the following,The administrator gave a copy of the letter given to residents restricting LOAs (Leave of Absence). Restrictions include times LOA are allowed, what activities that could result in restricting LOA, weather restrictions, residents must be accompanied by a community member during a LOA, and restrictions of resident personal items and activities residents cannot do in the community during a LOA. According to the letter, the letter was devised with input from the medial director, law enforcement, area businesses and members of the community . On 7/18/24 at 11:00 AM, an interview was completed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) regarding restrictions related to LOAs. The NHA explained there had been conversations with law enforcement, local business owners and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation in part pertains to Intake: MI00145599 Based on interview and record review that facility failed to assist the Resident Council to meet for their monthly meetings consistently. Findings include: On 7/18/24 at 10:45 AM, a request for the last three months of resident council meeting minutes was requested from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). On 7/18/24 at 11:00 AM, the NHA explained that during a mock survey, he identified that their was a deficiency in resident council meetings and showed the surveyor a folder of documents that were identified as resident council meeting notes that were either incomplete and/or missing dates. A review of the facility's Resident Council policy revealed the following, Policy Statement The facility supports residents' desires to be involved and have input in the operation of the facility through the Resident Council .1. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1.The purpose of the Resident Council is to provide a forum for: a. Residents to have input in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00141614. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of funds to the State Agency for one resident (R701) out of one reviewed for misappropriation of funds. Findings Include: On 2/22/2024 at 9:54 AM, an interview was conducted with R701. R701 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. R701 stated that back in December (2023) they were asleep, woke up and saw someone standing on the side of their bed. R701 stated that they thought they were just checking on them and went back to sleep. R701 stated that the next day they went to order some food and went in their wallet and $70 was missing. R701 stated that they reported it to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and they were told that they would not be getting reimbursed. A review of the medical record revealed that R701 admitted into the facility on 5/22/2019 with the following diagnoses, Major Depressive Disorder and Multiple Sclerosis. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00140504. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician recommendations following a Gastrointestinal (GI) consult, and follow physician ordered parameters upon administration of a laxative for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for adverse drug consequences. Findings include: A review of R901's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Heart Failure, and a history of Colon Cancer. Further review of R901's medical record revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing and toilet use. Further review of R901's medical record revealed the following progress note: 9/21/2023 15:00 (3:00pm) MD/NP/PA (medical doctor/nurse practitioner/physician assistant) Progress Note. Late Entry: Note Text: Physician Orders. Date: September 21, 2023 Orders: Result of STAT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00139096. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure rooms were maintained free of lingering debris and odors and trash for five residents (R3, R39, R41, R55, and R77) and eight resident rooms (Rooms 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 17) from a total sample of 56 residents, resulting in resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings include: On Monday 10/02/23 at 8:58 AM, on the walk way to the front door of the facility the landscaped beds were observed with dissimilar weeds and stray grasses in with the plants. A urine odor was noted when the resident care area was entered from the lobby. The ceiling was damaged between rooms 7, 10 and 11 and was covered with clear plastic which had been taped to the ceiling. R41 On 10/02/23 at 9:28 AM, the room of Resident R41 was observed with peppermint candies strewn under the bed and baseboard heater behind the head of the bed. R41 reported they had dropped them on Saturday. R41 noted that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 10/2/23 between 8:50 AM-10:20 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: The hand sink in the dish machine room was blocked by a stack of boxes containing jugs of distilled water. The boxes were moved to the side, and the hot water temperature at the hand sink was measured to be 69 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water at the hand sink located in the main kitchen was also tested, and was measured to be 86 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, the hand sink in the main kitchen did not have any handwashing signage. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 5-202.12 Handwashing Sink Installation, 1. (A) A HANDWASHING SINK shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 38°C (100°F) through a mixing valve or combination faucet. Pf According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 5-205.11 Using a Handwashing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the exterior trash refuse area in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: On 10/2/23 at 11:30 AM, the exterior trash refuse area was observed. There was a heavy accumulation of trash observed on the ground at the sides of both dumpsters, and in between the 2 dumpsters. A thick layer of trash bags, soiled adult briefs, milk cartons, straws, styrofoam cups, disposable plates and bowls, aluminum cans, disposable gloves, and flattened cardboard boxes littered the ground surrounding the dumpsters. On 10/2/23 at 11:45 AM, Dietary Manager N was queried about the cleaning of the exterior refuse area and stated that Maintenance was responsible for that area. Review of the facility's policy Dispose of Garbage and Refuse dated 08/2017 noted: All garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and efficient manner. Procedures: 1. The Dining Services Director coordinates with the Director of Maintenance to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00139498, MI00139958, and MI00139521. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care (ADLs) to six residents (R4, R41, R46, R55, R91, and R96) of nine residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in feelings of humiliation and dissatisfaction with care. Findings include: R96 On 10/3/23 at 9:15 AM, R96 was interviewed about their care at the facility and indicated that on 9/4/23 at around 2:45 PM, upon returning from a dialysis appointment and being assisted into bed, I told my staff that I needed to be assisted with toileting. I told my CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) and they never came back to help me. My call light was on for two hours. I called the police and the officer came out, I was covered with feces and feces was all over the bed. The officer saw it. I felt humiliated and horrible. R96 indicated that they had experienced extend call light wait times for toileting in the past as well. On 10/3/23 at 9:22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100138667. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow or document reason for one (R303) of three residents reviewed for discharges to return to the facility following hospitalization, resulting in R303 not being allowed to return to the facility, be provided an appropriate discharge or coordinate mental health and/or behavioral services. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R303 revealed an admission date of 03/27/03 with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease and Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that R303 required primarily Moderate/Maximum level assistance with activities of daily living and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 indicated intact cognition. Additional review of the facility record indicated that R303 had established a consistent pattern of aggressive and abusive behavior toward staff and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a fall prevention care plan after multiple falls, for one resident (R64) of six reviewed for accidents, resulting in multiple falls with major injures. Findings include: A review of R64's medical record noted the following falls, R64 2/01/23 unwitnessed fall, R64 found in bathroom with facial injuries and fractured right femur. 5/24/23 unwitnessed fall reported by R64 with no injuries. 8/01/23 unwitnessed fall reported by R64 in room, injuries fractured right forearm. 9/14/23 unwitnessed fall reported by R64 injuries facial bruises. 10/14/22 fall R64 sent to hospital with injuries. A review of R64's medical record revealed, an admission note related to the fall that occurred on 2/1/23. 2/6/2023 19:02 Orders - Administration Note Text: Patient arrived to facility via stretcher . Resident A & O x3 (alert and oriented to person, place and time). Able to make needs known. No acute distress noted. No s/s (signs symptoms) of SOB (short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a 14-day stop date or document rationale for continuation of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for one (R88) of three residents reviewed, resulting in unnecessary psychotropic medication use with the potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R88 revealed an admission date of 07/29/22 with diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type and Morbid Obesity. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R88 required primarily Maximum/Total level assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicated Moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/03/23 at 11:01 AM, review of R88's physician orders revealed an order for ABH (Ativan-Benadryl-Haldol) gel every 4 hours as needed for anxiety ordered 03/17/23 with no 14-day stop date or end date and remaining currently classified as active. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired biologicals were discarded and opened bilogicals were dated and labeled with a resident identifier in three of four medication carts resulting in the potential for the decreased effectiveness of biologicals and medications. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:24 AM, the A/B medication room was reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C. The medication room refrigerator was observed to be at 28 degrees Fahrenheit. This was also documented as the last temperature recorded on the log sheet posted on the refridgerator. The refrigerator contained liquid nutrition supplement and insulin mediations. On [DATE] at 9:15 the A wing medication cart was reviewed with LPN A. Two unknown open insulin vials were discarded along with two open Novolog vials with expired date of [DATE]; two open Glargine insulin vials dated [DATE] and one open Lantus dated opened [DATE]. A Symbicort inhaler, a fluticasone inhaler, a Trelegy inhaler and a Anoro…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain tube feeding poles and a tracheostomy (trach) cart surface in a sanitary manner, for two residents (R32 and R73), resulting in the potential for contamination of equipment. Findings include: R32 On 10/03/23 at 10:44 AM, R32's room was observed, with dried tube feeding formula along the pole and on the floor. On 10/03/23 at 11:45 AM, the room was observed in the same condition as above. On 10/04/23 at 11:06 AM, the room was observed in the same condition as above. R73 On 10/02/23 at 10:21 AM, R73's room was observed with dried tube feeding formula along the pole and on the floor. The cart that was observed to hold R73's trach care items and equipment was observed to be disorganized and unclean with debris on the shelves of the cart. On 10/03/23 at 10:15 AM, R73's room was observed in the same condition as 10/2/23. On 10/04/23 at 2:04 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the expectations of the staff to maintain a clean and sanitized condition in residents' room and explained, that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100134315. Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for two (R801, R803) of three residents reviewed for environmental concerns, resulting in resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings include: R801 Review of the facility record for R801 revealed an admission date of 05/25/22 with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus and Asthma. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R801 required supervision to maximum assistance with self care and mobility tasks. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 8/23/23 at 12:24 PM, R801's bathroom was observed to have open cracks and lifting in the flooring adjacent to the toilet, exposing the sub-floor. The caulk around the base of the toilet was partially missing and lifting, exposing the base flooring. Multiple dark stains were present…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-18 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation in part pertains to Intake: MI00145599 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional potentially affecting all 95 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/18/24 at 11:00 AM, during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) about the lack of resident council meetings being conducted, he explained that a new Activities Director was hired last month, as there was no one in the position when he took over the position only a short time ago. On 7/18/24 at 2:35 PM, an interview was completed with Activities Director A regarding their position start date, and she explained that she started on 6/10/24. Also present during the interview was Activities Aide B who explained that she started her position in April 2024, and since her start date, there has never been an Activities Director in place. On 7/18/24 at 2:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the lack of an Activities Director, and she explained from what she can recall, the last time they had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$139,006 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,105 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
- $32,262 — penalty dated 2024-04-04
- $93,639 — penalty dated 2023-10-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-01 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAJESTIC MICHIGAN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2021 |
| DEM FAMILY TRUST I | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 07/01/2021 |
| PRUITT, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| LIVONIA SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| ALEXANDER, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BAZZI, HASSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| GARRISON, LUKE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2024 |
| MARX, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| REWA, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2023 |
| RUSSELL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SHATROV, ANZHELIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| WOLFE, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| 4 MDR OF QUEENS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MDG MAJESTIC MICHIGAN REALTY I LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL LIMITED | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235057. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.