Atchison Senior Village Rehabilitation And Nursing
1419 N 6th Street, Atchison, KS 66002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (913) 367-1906 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,817 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.4% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.3% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.1% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.2–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 73.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.78 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 44.6 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident with little or poor safety awareness exits the facility without staff knowledge). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for Resident (R) 1, who was cognitively impaired, at high risk for elopement, and had a recent history of exit-seeking. The facility placed a WanderGuard (a bracelet that helps monitor residents who are at risk of wandering) on R1 on 10/04/24 due to R1's exit-seeking behaviors and setting off door alarms. R1 wandered the halls and into other residents' rooms almost daily from 10/06/24 through, and including, 10/11/24. On 10/12/24 R1 ambulated past staff, from the dining room to the great room. Staff observed R1 in the lobby area around the 300 hall after he left the dining room, but did not accompany or redirect him to a safe place. R1 ambulated to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week. Findings included:- The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ-a required detail of staffing information submitted by nursing homes to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) lacked RN eight-hour coverage for September 27, 2025, September 28, 2025, and December 20, 2025. On 02/12/26 at 08:58 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified that the two days in September and one day in December lacked eight consecutive RN hours. The facility's Consistent RN Coverage policy, dated 03/2025, documented it was the policy of the facility to ensure adequate RN coverage. The facility must provide licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day and an RN on duty for at least eight consecutive hours daily, seven days a week, unless a state-approved waiver applies.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen. Findings included:- On 02/10/26 at 07:17 AM, observation in the nutrition center two-door refrigerator/freezer had the following: An unlabeled, undated crab salad sandwich wrapped in aluminum foil. An unlabeled, undated plastic bag with 6 cookie dough batters. An 40 ounce (oz) unlabeled, undated, plastic bag of onion rings, approximately a quarter full. An unlabeled, undated, and uncovered cup of ice cream, with the top uncovered and open to the air. The February 2026 refrigerator/ freezer temperature log had missing documentation for morning and evening shifts on February 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8. On 02/10/26 at 07:20 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB and Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the above findings. DS BB stated that dietary staff and activity staff were responsible for labeling and dating food items placed in the nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two medication rooms and three medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately store medications and biologicals when staff failed to ensure the tuberculin (a sterile liquid used to diagnose tuberculosis) test serum was dated after opened, and further failed to ensure safe medication administration when staff prepped two residents' medications in medication cups, unlabeled in the medication cart.Findings included: On 02/10/26 at 08:34 AM, a medication room refrigerator contained one vial of tuberculin test serum. The tuberculin serum was opened and undated. On 02/10/26 at 08:37 AM LN H stated all tuberculin test serum that was opened should have a date. She stated the serum was good for 30 days after the vial had been opened. LN H stated the person who opened the serum should have dated the vial. On 02/10/26 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated all nurses should ensure there was no medication outdated or unlabeled. Administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to administer Resident (R)2's Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial pneumonia infections) vaccination that R2 consented to receive.Findings included: - Review of R2's clinical record revealed no documented PCV20, and the last documented influenza vaccine was 10/29/25. R2's consent form for PCV20 was dated 08/30/25.R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked documentation R2 received the PCV20.On 02/12/26 at 08:22 AM, Administrative Nurse F stated consent forms for immunizations were signed as refused or consented at admission. She stated it was the floor nurse's responsibility to give the vaccination, if possible. Administrative Nurse F stated R2 signed a consent for PCV20, but the vaccine was not given. She stated it was her responsibility to give the vaccine if the vaccine was not given on admission.On 02/12/26 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week. This placed the residents at risk of decreased quality of care. Findings included: - The Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal year (FY) 2023 Quarters 3 and 4 indicated 139 days the facility did not have an RN for eight consecutive hours each 24-hour period. A review of timeclock and payroll data revealed the facility had eight consecutive hours of RN coverage all but four days (04/16/23, 05/06/23, 05/07/23, and 05/21/23). On 04/17/24 at 03:06 PM Administrative Staff A stated she could not say what the previous system was to track and ensure there were eight consecutive RN hours seven days a week before 03/01/24. The Nursing Administrative- Nursing Services policy last revised in February 2024 documented it was the policy of this facility to maintain adequate nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Four Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) and one Certified Medication [NAME] (CMA) were sampled for performance reviews. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the required nurse aide performance review at least once every 12 months. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - CNA N had a hire date of 01/19/17. The facility lacked evidence a performance review was completed in the last 12 months upon request. CNA O had a hired date of 08/27/17. The facility lacked evidence a performance review was completed in the last 12 months upon request. CNA P had a hire date of 04/19/12. The facility lacked evidence a performance review was completed in the last 12 months upon request. CNA Q had a hire date of 11/07/22. The facility lacked evidence a performance review was completed in the last 12 months upon request. CMA N had a hire date of 06/19/22. The facility lacked evidence a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing data for all direct care personnel as required one quarter and failed to submit accurate data on others. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 2 and 2024 Quarter 1 indicated data was suppressed though the facility did not meet the reasons for suppressed data other than inaccurate data or failure to report. The PBJ report indicated 23 days in FY 2023 Quarters 3 and 4 the facility did not have a licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day. A review of timeclock and payroll data revealed the facility had LN coverage 24 hours a day on the days listed on the PBJ. The PBJ report indicated 139 days in FY 2023 Quarter 3 and 4 the facility did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a shower/bath was consistently provided for Resident (R) 30, R22, R18, R7, and R16 who were dependent on staff assistance with ADLs. The facility also failed to ensure R16 was assisted with dressing. This deficient practice had the potential to cause skin breakdown and/or skin complications due to poor personal hygiene and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure hazardous materials out of reach of five cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility also failed to ensure Resident (R)25's fall interventions were implemented per her plan of care at mealtime. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - On 04/18/2024 at 07:11 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the facility's 100 and 200 unsecured laundry rooms revealed accessible containers of sanitary bleach wipes. The wipes contained a Keep out of reach from children warning. An inspection of the 300 hallway's unsecured laundry room revealed sanitary bleach wipes and a bottle of tuberculocidal (bacterial infection of the lungs) disinfectant spray. The wipes contained a Keep out of reach from children warning. On 04/17/24 at 12:45 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure guidelines for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) were followed when the facility failed to have personal protective equipment (PPE) readily available for staff use, stored outside the room. The facility failed to ensure staff sanitized resident equipment when it fell on the floor. This placed the residents at risk of infection development. Findings included: - Upon inspection of the facility during the initial tour on 04/15/24 around 07:15 AM observation revealed that the facility did not have PPE readily available for staff usage if needed stored outside the room. The facility had PPE stored in the resident's room and not in a covered cart or storage area. On 04/17/24 at 08:48 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G was outside of Resident (R) 2's room with her medication cart. LN G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with eight residents reviewed for resident rights. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 was treated with respect and dignity during incontinence care. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased autonomy and dignity. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), obesity (excessive body fat), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), candidiasis (a fungal infection caused by a yeast), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R7 was dependent on staff for toileting and was frequently incontinent. R7's Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with eight residents reviewed for resident rights. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)22 was allowed to exercise her right for self-determination without intimidation. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes related to decreased autonomy and impaired rights. Findings Included: - On 04/17/24 at 11:00 AM R22 stated she felt pressured by the facility to switch pharmacy services during the facility's ownership changeover. She stated R21 (her spouse) and she were told by the facility their medications may be difficult to obtain by their previous pharmacy once the facility switched to the new one. She stated she was afraid of not receiving her medications due to her existing medical problems. R22 stated after she changed pharmacy, she had to wait two days for clotrimazole (medication used to treat a fungal infection) cream to be delivered by the new pharmacy. R22 stated she and R21 would not have changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with seven reviewed for maintaining activities of daily living. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assist Resident (R)16 with maintaining her amplified hearing device. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for a decline in communication and psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R16's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of an anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and gastro-esophageal reflux disorder (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). R16's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 03/04/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she required substantial to maximal assistance for bathing, dressing, and toileting. The MDS indicated she had moderate difficulty hearing but did not use hearing aids. R16's Communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) care. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)25's pressure-reducing device was in her recliner as care planned. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R25's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of repeated falls, muscle weakness, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). R25's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/24/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of zero indicating severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask was stored in a sanitary manner to decrease exposure and contamination for Resident (R) 30. This placed R30 at increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a staff interview that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to care for resident's needs when staff lacked knowledge related to dosing and administering diclofenac gel (a topical ointment used to relieve arthritis pain) for Resident (R) 17. This deficient practice placed R17 at risk of adverse side effects. Findings included: - On 04/16/24 at 09:38 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R prepared and dispensed medications for R17. CMA R performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves. CMA R then opened the tube of diclofenac gel and squeezed an unmeasured amount onto her glove. CMA R did not review R17's diclofenac gel order for a dosage amount before she applied the medication. On 04/16/24 at 09:40 AM CMA R stated she was not aware that the diclofenac even had a dosage amount. CMA R stated she had always been told to just squeeze out an amount either on the finger of a glove or to squeeze some into a medication cup.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. There were 13 residents in the sample. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)4's medications were available for administration without missed doses during the facility's change-over to a new pharmacy provider. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk of unnecessary complications and an ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent depression feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical change), weakness, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and bipolar disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management were documented including risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 29, who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and received Risperdal (antipsychotic). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space just outside the brain), dementia, and hypertension (HTN-elevated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a communication process was implemented, which included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, for Resident (R) 2 and R30. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services and impaired physical, and psychosocial care for R2 and R30. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This placed all residents who resided in the facility at risk of lack of assessment and inappropriate care. Findings include: - Review of the July, August, and September 2022 nursing schedule revealed no Registered Nurse on the following dates: 07/01/22 through 07/07/22, 07/09/22, 07/12/22 through 07/15/22, 07/19/22 through 07/24/22, 07/26/22 through 07/29/22, 08/03/22, 08/05/22 through 08/09/22, 08/10/22 through 08/11/22, 08/14/22 08/15/22, 08/19/22 through 08/22/22, and 09/22/22. On 10/27/22 at 08:40 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of Registered Nurse coverage on the above listed dates. The facility's Nursing Service Policy, 6/ 24/22, documented a registered nurse should be on duty at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility may include the director of nursing to meet this requirement. The facility failed to provide Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide no less than 12 hours of in-service education per year for 5 of 5 reviewed certified nurse aides. Findings included: - Review of in-services, for direct care staff N, O, P, Q, and MM, revealed the staff records completed the required 12 hours of in-service education in the prior 12 month period but no evidence of education hours were provided for the last 12 months. On 11/2/22 at 11:29AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the above findings and stated a nurse should be designated to assure certified nurse aides complete 12-hour required annual in-services and she expected competency training to be done on a yearly basis. The facility's Competency Evaluation Policy, undated, documented the facility would evaluate each employee to assure appropriate competencies and skills for performing his or her job and to meet the needs of facility residents. Evaluating competency of staff is accomplished through the facility's training program. Initial competency is evaluated during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), placing the 35 residents who reside in the facility at risk for lack of quality improved services. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 during entrance conference the facility failed to provide a QAPI plan. On 11/01/22 at 03:45 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have a current QAPI plan. On 11/02/22 at 09:00AM, Administrative Staff A provided the survey team with a copy of a QAPI plan which was dated 2017 and lacked current facility information. The facility's undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) policy documented the facility will design the facility's QAPI program and QAA committee responsibilities, actions and processes on how the committee will conduct activities necessary to identify and correct deficiencies. tracking and measuring performance , establish goals, develop and implement corrective actions. The QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility's (QAA) Quality Assessment and Assurance program failed to indeitfy efforts to imporve multiple issues of concern. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Findings included: - Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity during dining. Refer to F550. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide choices for bathing. Refer to F561. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe clean environment. Refer to F584. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for elopement. Refer to F656. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to recap a discharge summary on a closed record. Refer to F661. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bathing services for a resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-02 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) that had the required QAA members and met quarterly, placing the residents at risk for lack of quality improved services. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 during entrance conference the facility did not provide a list of members of the QAA committee, and verified there has not been a QAA meeting recently. On 11/1/22 at 03:45PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not currently have a QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) plan. On 11/1/22 at 04:10PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility had not conducted a QAA meeting in the past five months. Review of the QA&A sign in sheets for the past year quarterly meetings were held on: 11/3/21, 02/16/22 and 05/25/22. There was no Director of Nursing or Infection Control Preventionist who attended those meetings. The required meeting should have been August 2022. The facility's undated Quality Assurance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to have an infection control program which included tracking, education and prevention of infections. The facility further failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene and handling of soiled linens for Resident (R) 17, who had a draining wound. This placed the residents in the facility at increased risk for infections and communicable disease. Findings included: - On 11/01/22 at 3:10PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have a tracking or quality improvement for an infection control program. The facility's Infection Surveillance, undated policy, documented the facility will have a system of infection surveillance which serves as a core activity of the facility's infection prevention and control program. Its purpose is to identify infections and to monitor adherence to recommended infection prevention and control practices in order to reduce infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an ongoing infection surveillance program which included antibiotic stewardship. This placed the 35 residents who resided in the facility at increased risk for receiving an infection and /or negative effects of antibiotic use. Findings included: - On 11/01/22 at 3:10PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, dated 05/22/22, documented the antibiotic stewardship program will be an integral part of the Infection Control Program. Antibiotics use will be tracked as part of the overall infection control monitoring system. The DON will have primary responsibility for the process along with the Pharmacy Consultant and the medical director. Monitoring will include and evaluation of antibiotic use documentation. Antibiotic prescriptions will be done monthly to assess appropriateness for the individual resident. Lab testing results will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-02 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility employed a designated staff person for the Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) and who completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 at 08:15AM, during the initial entrance conference Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have an Infection Preventionist. On 11/01/22 at 3:10PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have an Infection Preventionist. The facility' Infection Preventionist undated policy, documented the facility will employ one or more qualified individuals with responsibility for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program. The facility will ensure the Infection Preventionist is qualified by education, training and certification. Develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents who resided in the facility. This placed the residents at risk for impaired comfort. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 at 8:30 AM, observation revealed the following: On the 300 hall, Resident (R)17's wall next to her bed had an area with two gouges (a grove, hole or indentation in the wall). One was approximately 0.5 inches (in) wide by 12 in long. The other gouge was approximately 0.5 in wide by eight in long. The gouges had numerous areas of different size peeling paint around them. On the same hall, R38's wall beside her bed had numerous areas, varying sizes, of peeling paint. On 10/26/22 at 11:19AM, observation revealed the following: The ceiling in the dining room had two areas, approximately three feet (ft) by four ft, around two ceiling vents with black substance. The wall below the steam table was missing a piece of ceramic tile approximately six in by 12 i.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs at the end of daily worked shifts for Hall 300. This practice placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications by staff and unmet therapeutic medication regimen. Findings included: -On 10/26/22 at 09:50 AM during initial tour of the facility, observation revealed the Hall 300 Narcotic Count Sheet lacked a second signature for the following second shift dates 09/09/22 through 09/12/22 and 09/20/22, 09/20/22, 09/22/22, 09/22/22 and 09/24/22 through 09/26/22. The third shift only had signatures for 10/05/22, 10/09/22, 10/15/22, and 10/24/22 (28 third shift days without signatures). On 10/26/22 at 09:50 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R verified lack of signatures on the Narcotic Count Sheet' and stated the lack of signatures were probably due to agency staff. On 11/02/22 at 09:00 AM Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of signatures on the Narcotic Count Sheets and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the residents who received their food from the facility kitchen, when staff failed to label and date two open food items in the kitchen freezer. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 at 08:15 AM, observation revealed in the walk in freezer, located in the kitchen, had a three-quarters full bag of chocolate chip cookies and three-quarters full bag of chicken wings without a date or label. On 10/26/22 at 08:15 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified the above finding and removed and discarded the for items in the trash. DS BB stated staff should label and date food items when they open them. The facility's Food Storage Policy, revised April 1995, documented all refrigerated /frozen foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. Foods would be stored in sealed Ziploc or storage containers and labeled either with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident (R) 23, who received an insulin (a hormone to regulate glucose) injection in the dining room. This placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity Findings included: - On 10/27/22 at 07:45 AM, observation revealed R23 sat in a high backed wheelchair at a dining room table; two other residents were also seated at the table. Further observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H pulled up the right sleeve of R23's shirt and administered an insulin injection in her arm. On 10/27/22 at 2:10PM, Administrative Nurse D verified R23 should not have received an insulin injection at the dining table. The Promoting Maintaining Resident Dignity, undated policy documented the facility is to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains quality of life. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff honored Resident (R) 30's personal choices for days and times of bathing per his request. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene and impaired autonomy. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses major depressive disorder (major mood disorder) and history of urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system). R30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R30 required limited staff assistance with dressing and personal hygiene, supervision with walk in corridor; he was independent with the rest of ADL. The MDS documented R30 required assistance with bathing. R30's ADL Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include potential risk for elopement for Resident (R) 36 and R5. Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of dementia (a group of thinking and social systems that interferes with daily functioning). R36's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident was independently ambulatory and required no assistive devices. She wandered one to three days of the look back period. R36's Cognition Care Plan, dated 08/17/22, informed the staff the resident had confusion at times and required staff redirection. The medical record lacked an elopement assessment. The medical record lacked a care plan for elopement risk. The Social Services notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of the residents reviewed for discharge that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post-discharge plan for Resident (R) 40. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care. Findings included: - R40's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R40 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R40 required limited staff assistance with dressing and toilet use and supervision with rest of activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R40 had no discharge plan. R40's Discharge Care Plan, dated 08/17/22, documented the resident planned to discharge to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide bathing on a regular basis for one of four reviewed for acgtivities of daily living (ADLs), Resident (R) 30. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses major depressive disorder (major mood disorder) and history of urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system). R30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R30 required limited staff assistance with dressing and personal hygiene, supervision with walk in corridor; he was independent with the rest of ADL. The MDS documented R30 required assistance with bathing. R30's ADL Care Plan, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to assess and identify potential risk for elopement for Resident (R) 36 and R5 placing them at increased potential for injury. Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of dementia (a group of thinking and social systems that interferes with daily functioning). R36's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident was independently ambulatory and required no assistive devices. She wandered one to three days of the look back period. R36's Cognition Care Plan, dated 08/17/22, informed the staff the resident had confusion at times and required staff redirection. The Social Services notes, dated 08/04/22 at 12:28 PM, stated R36's admitted from a home setting due to dementia and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-11-02 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff nursing schedule was posted two of four days during the onsite survey. This placed the residents at risk for decreased knowledge regarding their care. Findings included: - On 10/26/22 at 07:45 AM observation revealed no nursing hours posted for the day. On 10/27/22 at 08:45 AM observation revealed no nursing hours posted for the day. On 10/27/22 at 08:45 AM Administrative Nurse D verified nursing hours had not been posted. Administrative Nurse D stated the nursing schedule was usually kept in the medication room. Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the night shift nurse stored the schedule in the drawer of the front desk. The facility's Nurse Staffing Posting Information Policy, undated, documented the facility would make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. The facility failed to post daily nursing hours for residents and visitors which placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-11-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. Based on interview and record review. the facility failed to complete a facility assessment that included a competency-based approach to determine the knowledge and skills required among staff to ensure residents are able to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, functional, mental, and psychosocial well-being and meet current professional standards of practice. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate care. Findings included: - The Facility Assessment, updated 10/04/22, documented how they would staff for nursing and direct care, but failed to include a competency-based approach to determine the knowledge and skills required among staff to ensure residents are able to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, functional, mental, and psychosocial well-being and met current professional standards of practice. On 11/02/22 at 0845 AM, Administrative Staff A verified finding above and stated it was a work in progress, but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,817 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
- $3,764 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $9,032 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROTH, MCGARRETT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/01/2024 |
| BURTON, SPENCER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/19/2023 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/19/2023 |
| FITCH, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/19/2023 |
| LEWIS, CORWIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/19/2023 |
| MUNFORD, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175531. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.