Riverbend Post Acute Rehabilitation
7850 Freeman Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66112 · For profit - Corporation · 131 certified beds · (913) 334-3666 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $84,023 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.7% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.5%CMS range 38.8–72.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.1–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.3–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 117.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from neglect when staff failed to ensure R1 received adequate care and services required to prevent harm or injury to her physical and psychosocial wellbeing. R1, who had a colostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening on the stomach wall to excrete feces from the body) and an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through into the bladder to drain urine), was legally blind and dependent on staff for hygiene was outside without staff for extended periods of time with no brief or underwear, and with urinary catheter tubing exposed. On 05/28/24 R1 complained of a burning sensation to her genital area and the staff took R1 to her room for assessment and discovered maggots in R1's genital area and vagina. R1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation of the infestation of her genital area. The facility's failure to identify risks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean home-like environment for the residents. Findings Included:- During an observation on 05/05/26 at 08:10 AM on the second floor of the facility, the ice room revealed a dirty towel underneath the door into the room. A tray of clean cups was next to a tray on the counter with multiple cups, plates, and food from a previous meal, and dirty towels were on the sink next to the tray of clean cups. The bottom of the cabinet underneath the handwashing sink was sunken and had multiple wet & soiled towels and a black substance on the floor of this cabinet. The cabinet doors had water damage at the top of the door. The sink was soiled with food debris. A fan full of dust on the screen and blades was blowing and oscillating and blew directly onto the tray of clean cups on the counter. An ice scoop was lying on a stained & dirty lid of an ice chest. Ice water inside the ice chest had debris floating in the water.An observation on 05/05/26 at 08:30 AM on the second floor of the facility in the soiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility staff failed to implement adequate infection control practices related to lack of hand hygiene, cleaning of shared equipment, and sanitary storage of respiratory equipment. Findings included:- Observed on 05/06/26 at 07:40 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R obtained Resident (R) 6's blood pressure and pulse with the vital machine; CMA R took the vitals machine from the neighboring room. CMA R did not sanitize the vitals machine before taking it into R6's room. Licensed Nurse (LN) G asked for the vitals machine, stated she would bring the vitals machine back. LN G did not sanitize the vitals machine before taking the machine from R6's room, who was on EHB. LN G took the vitals machine down the hall and obtained vitals from a resident sitting next to her medication cart. LN G did not sanitize the vitals machine after obtaining vitals. LN G returned the vitals machine to CMA R. CMA R did not sanitize the vitals machine before taking it to the next resident's room.Observed on 05/05/26 at 08:12 AM, R100's CPAP mask and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 76 was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer oral medications before staff left medications in a medication cup in the resident's room. Findings included:- R76's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - backflow of stomach contents into the esophagus), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), chronic pain syndrome, seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), muscle weakness, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), chronic kidney disease (CKD), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). R76's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to verify the advanced directive (legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves) displayed in Resident (R) 16's clinical record accurately reflected her advanced directives for Do Not Resuscitate Directive (DNR- a legal document or order that means the person does not desire resuscitative measures in the event of cardiac arrest). Findings included: - R16's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness).R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from all forms of abuse when Resident (R) 132 grabbed R127 by the neck on 04/13/26. Findings included:- R132's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (MDD - a major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R132's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 02/11/26, documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R132 utilized a walker for mobility.R132's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/26/26, documented he was at risk for alterations in self-care related to occasional bowel and bladder incontinence, and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and was at risk for complications as evidenced by decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 122 received the assistance he needed with eating. Findings Included:- R122's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) with cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure, and obesity, need for assistance with personal care, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R122 had an impairment of the extremities on both sides of his body. The MDS documented R122 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 31 the necessary activities of daily living (ADL) cares including hygiene assistance with cleaning his fingernails. Findings:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R31's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness).R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 07/17/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent activities for Resident (R) 10. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for R10 included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (common motor deficits affecting one side of the body following a cerebral infarction [stroke]), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function).R10's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/10/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that R10 used a wheelchair for mobility and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS documented that R10 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) and a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG - a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 126 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accidents and hazards when staff left a cognitively impaired resident by herself in the shower, resulting in a fall with injury. (Resident 127) Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R) 127 revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, memory and attention, memory, planning, problem-solving and safety awareness), and iron deficiency anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The 03/19/26 Annual admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan dated 03/12/26 for R127 revealed due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately when staff failed to properly secure a medication cart. Findings included:- Observed 05/06/26 at 08:17 AM on the second floor, a large rolling medication cart sat in the hall, unattended, with the lock partially pushed in. It contained stock bottles of medications, cards of resident-specific medication, and personal drink cups. In an interview on 05/06/26 at 08:19 AM with Licensed Nurse (LN) L, she confirmed she thought the cart was locked and stated the medication cart should always be locked when it is unattended or out of sight. The requested facility policy, Medication Labels and Storage, dated 03/2024, did not address the resident medication carts.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a functional call light system for Resident (R) 111 while he was on or in bed, in order to convey his needs to staff. Findings included:- R111's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed a diagnosis of generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and unsteadiness on feet.R111's Care Plan dated 08/25/2025 stated R111 was at risk for falls related to occasional bladder incontinence and he required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)s He was at risk for complications as evidenced by decreased functional mobility and dementia (decline in cognitive functioning The plan directed staff to be sure the call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it to call for assistance as needed.Observed on 05/05/2026 at 10:25 AM, R111's call light was at the head of his bed. R111 sat on the edge of the bed. R111 stated he was trying to get some help, but no one was coming. A check of the call light within reach of R111's bed revealed the light did not come on at the door or at the monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility staff failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and functional environment on one of the stairwells. Findings included:- Observed on 05/07/2026 at 08:30 AM, one of the stairwells had a white, wet, organic type substance on the walls with a strong musty odor. There was dusty debris, which appeared to be flaked plaster, on the handrail and the floor at the back wall of the stairwell. There were stains which appeared to be water damage on the ceiling inside the stairwell.Interviewed on 05/07/2026 at 08:37 AM, Housekeeping Staff stated that housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning the floors and handrails in the stairwell, but not the walls and ceilingsInterviewed on 05/07/2026 at 08:40 AM, Maintenance Staff U stated the maintenance department would be responsible for cleaning the walls of the stairwell. He said he would get a plan in place to spray the white substance on the walls with bleach to clean it.During an interview on 05/07/2026 at 08:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with seven reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs related to call lights and wheelchair foot pedals. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 84 had a call light he could functionally activate for staff assistance and ensure R96, R47, and R81 had foot pedals on their wheelchairs while being pushed. The facility additionally failed to provide R10's sensory hand item.Findings Included:- On 11/18/25 at 08:55 AM, R84 (severely cognitively impaired resident) sat in his bed with his bedside table over him. He stated he was done with his breakfast tray and needed staff to assist him. R84's call light was placed inside the dresser next to his bed and out of his reach. R84's low air-loss mattress was set to 200 pounds (lbs). On 11/18/25 at 09:00 AM, R96 (severely cognitively impaired resident) was pushed into the dining room in his wheelchair. His feet slid on the floor as he was pushed from his room to the dining room table. His wheelchair had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure rooms containing hazardous materials to keep out of reach of 12 cognitively impaired /independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to follow Resident (R) 61 and R67's implemented fall interventions per their care plans.Findings Included: - On 11/17/25 at 07:10 AM, a walkthrough was completed in the facility's secured 2nd floor, and the following was observed: An inspection of an unsecured linen closet next to the nurse's station next to the elevator, revealed a container of purple disinfectant wipes on top of the room's counter. An inspection of the dining area revealed a cabinet next to the seating area with a container of purple wipes stored in the upper cabinet. An inspection of an unsecured soiled utility closet next to the rear nurse's station revealed two overfilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 67 had a physician's order and was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer an inhaler medication.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R67 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (when the body can't effectively get rid of carbon dioxide because of persistent lung disease).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R67 had intact cognition. R67 required supervision with showers, dressing, mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The assessment documented R67 received an antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people), antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, due to her posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), to provide only female caregivers that were requested, for Resident (R) 82. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R82 documented diagnoses of PTSD and insomnia (inability to sleep).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R82 had intact cognition. R82 was independent with dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The assessment documented R82 had no behaviors and did not receive psychotropic medications.R82's Care Plan dated 09/27/25, initiated on 06/27/25, documented social services to provide psychosocial support as needed. The care plan lacked documentation R82 requested no male caregivers.The Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with one resident reviewed for the discharge process. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a final summary of Resident (R) 128's status at discharge. Findings included:- R128s Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses of unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), acquired absence of left great toe, blindness right eye muscle, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty).R128's Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 09/18/25.R128's Care Plan dated 09/18/25 documented:- R128 wanted to be discharged home after his skilled stay in the facility. - R128's plan of care dated 10/03/25 documented a pre-discharge plan would be held with the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents, Resident (R) 67 for smoking, and for R82 for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress). Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R67 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (when the body can't effectively get rid of carbon dioxide because of persistent lung disease).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R67 had intact cognition. R67 required R67 supervision with showers, dressing, mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident (R) 10 with showers as scheduled. Findings Included:- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA: stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing, need for assistance), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint).R10's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with five reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 84's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when R84's low air-loss mattress (specialized air mattress used to prevent pressure related wounds) was not set within his current weight range. The facility additionally failed to float R10's heels as directed by wound treatment. heelsFindings included:- R84's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), heart disease, and a stage-three (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure injury. R84's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 82 received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause traumatization related to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress). Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R82 documented diagnoses of PTSD and insomnia (inability to sleep).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R82 had intact cognition. R82 was independent with dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The assessment documented R82 had no behaviors and did not receive psychotropic medications.R82's Care Plan dated 09/27/25, initiated on 06/27/25, documented social services to provide psychosocial support as needed. The EMR lacked documentation of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to hold Midodrine (a medication for low blood pressure) for Resident (R) 26 and R97 and failed to hold insulin (controls the amount of sugar in the blood by moving into the cells) as the physician ordered for R67. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels) and hypotension (low blood pressure).The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R26 had intact cognition. R26 required supervision from staff for toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, and transfers. The assessment further documented R26 received insulin, opioid (moderate to severe pain medication), and antiplatelet (medication that prevents platelets from sticking together and decreases your body's ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with two reviewed for Hospice (specialized care that mainly aims to provide comfort and dignity to the patients, by providing physical comfort and emotional, social, and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a communication process between the hospice provider and the facility for Resident (R) 34, which included a plan of care and a description of the services provided, which included visit frequency for certified nurse aides, chaplain, medications, and medical equipment provided.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 documented diagnoses of Huntington's disease (a rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration, a disabling central nervous system movement disorder), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R5's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), hyperthyroidism (a condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland), muscle weakness, and contracture right ankle. R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded he required moderate staff assistance with transfers and activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS documented the resident propelled independently with a wheelchair and received insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood), opioid (a class of controlled drugs used to treat pain) medications, and antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications. The Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/10/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 35s, R5s, R88s, R17s, R59s, R13s, R6s, R110s, R10s, R16s, and R64s insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens and vials with the opened date and when expired. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 09:00 AM, observation of the facility's South Hall medication cart revealed the following: R35's Insulin Aspart (fast-acting) flex pen was not labeled with the date opened or the date expired. R5's Lispro (fast-acting) insulin vial was not labeled with the date opened or the date expired. R88's Lantus Solostar (long-acting) insulin was not labeled with the date opened or the date expired, and Lispro Kwik pen was not labeled with the date opened or the date expired. R17's Glargine (long-acting) insulin flex pen was not labeled with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used during high contact resident care activities) for Resident (R) 5 who had a diabetic neuropathy ulcer (wound on the skin, typically the feet, that develops due to nerve damage (neuropathy) and decreased sensation caused by diabetes) on his right great toe and right second toe. This placed the resident at risk for possible exposure to infection. Findings included: - On 05/20/25 at 08:00 AM, observation revealed License Nurse (LN) G entered the room of R5, who was lying in bed in his room with both feet under the covers. Observation revealed LN G removed the covers from his right lower leg. Observation revealed LN G washed her hands, donned gloves but no gown, and removed R5's dressings on his right great toe, and right second toe.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include resident-centered functional abilities for Resident (R) 41 and R69. This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included: - R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), obstructive sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with one reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing and grooming for one resident, Resident (R) 43. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to poor hygiene and impaired dignity. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing attention, memory planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with four reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to address one resident, Resident (R) 36's dementia care needs, when R36 continued to go through staff members' belongings that were kept at the nurse's station. This placed R36 at risk for decreased quality of life and accidents. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of Wernicke's encephalopathy (a degenerative brain disorder caused by the lack of vitamin B1), alcohol-induced persisting amnestic disorder (a cognitive disorder characterized by significant memory impairment), alcohol dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medication per the physician-ordered parameters for Resident (R) 13. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing attention, memory planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had severely impaired cognition. R13 required partial staff assistance for showers, dressing, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 113 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a medication administration error for Resident (R) 13, whose blood pressure was out of the physician's ordered parameters, and she received her blood pressure medication. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing attention, memory planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had severely impaired cognition. R13 required partial staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure areas containing hazardous materials out of reach of seven cognitively impaired /independently mobile residents in the secured unit. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - The facility identified Residents (R) 14, R45, R47, R63, R103, R105, and R110 were cognitively impaired residents within the secured 2nd-floor. On 01/21/25 at 07:30 AM, an inspection of the 2nd-floor nursing station revealed an alcohol-based disinfectant container of alcohol-based disinfectant wipes on the outside counter of the nurse's station. A shelf next to the sensory room, behind the nurse's station revealed two more disinfectant containers on the top shelf. The wipe's containers contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. On 01/21/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 32's right to be treated with respect, and dignity when her privacy curtain or door was closed when she was uncovered and exposed from the waist down. This deficient practice placed R32 at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased dignity. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the body is unable to use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), and congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/27/24 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated an intact cognition. R32 required substantial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for accommodation of needs related assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to utilize wheelchair foot pedals for Resident (R) 14, R47, and R82. This placed the resident at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 01/21/25 at 07:45 AM, R14 (a severely cognitively impaired resident) was wheeled to the small dining room for breakfast. Her wheelchair had no foot pedals and her feet slid on the ground as she was pushed. On 01/21/25 at 09:20 AM, R14 was pushed by staff from the second-floor small dining room to her room. R14's wheelchair lacked foot pedals as her feet slid on the ground multiple times while being pushed to her room. On 01/22/25 at 08:09 AM, R82 (a severely cognitively impaired resident) was pushed by staff out of his room and to the main second-floor dining room for breakfast. R82's feet touched the ground multiple times while being pushed while being pushed. Staff verbally reminded him to raise his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with one reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 13's physician with refused daily weights. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for unmet needs. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affects joints and other organ systems), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), obesity (excessive body fat), absence of right leg below the knee, wheelchair weakness, sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), need for assistance with personal care, and contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of right hand.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing heel supportive device was in place for Resident (R) 51 who had a pressure-related injury on his right buttocks. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk for complications related to further skin breakdown. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of foot drop in right foot (inability or difficulty in moving the ankle and toes upward), pressure ulcer of right buttocks, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, weakness, reduced mobility, contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of the right shoulder, left shoulder, right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)26's orthotic (support or brace for limbs) was in place. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings Included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), hypertension (high blood pressure), colostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening on the stomach wall to excrete feces from the body), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 27's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice placed R27 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), dependence on dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), unsteadiness of feet, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 51 had a documented risk assessment for the use of side rails, consent for the use of the side rails, and failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party were advised of the risks and/or benefits of the use of the side rails. This placed the R51 at risk for uninformed decision and impaired safety related to the risks associated with the use of side rails. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of foot drop in right foot (inability or difficulty in moving the ankle and toes upward), pressure ulcer of right buttocks, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, weakness, reduced mobility, contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of the right shoulder, left shoulder, right knee, left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four residents reviewed for frequency of physician visits. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician conducted the required visits for Resident (R) 51. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk of unrealized changes in condition leading to unnecessary complications in his wellbeing. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of foot drop in right foot (inability or difficulty in moving the ankle and toes upward), pressure ulcer of right buttocks (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, weakness, reduced mobility, and contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of the right shoulder, left shoulder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related behavioral services for Resident (R) 14 to promote her highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia, cognitive-communication disorder, repeated falls, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and scoliosis (curvature of the spine). R14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 11/27/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted a history of hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created). The MDS indicated she required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 112 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 27's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) mask was stored appropriately when not in use. The facility failed to ensure R315's tracheal (a surgical procedure that creates an open in the neck and windpipe to help a person breathe) tubing was stored appropriately when not in use. The facility failed to ensure R48's nasal cannula (a hollow tube device used to provide supplemental oxygen) was appropriately stored when not in use. These deficient practices placed R27, R315, and R48 at risk of infection development and possible respiratory complications. Findings included: - On 01/21/25 at 08:33 AM, R27 laid in his bed. R27's CPAP mask laid directly on the bedside table. On 01/22/25 at 08:22 AM, R315 laid in her bed on her back, R315's tracheal tubing was disconnected from her trachea, and placed in a drawer in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 110 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented nursing services consistent with standards of care when staff failed to follow a physician's order to notify emergency medical services (EMS) when Resident (R) 1 had chest pain and required a second dose of nitroglycerine (NTG-medication used to relieve an angina attack that is already occurring) and failed to assess vital signs to monitor resident status. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for delayed emergency care and complications related to the use of NTG. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Diagnosis tab listed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque (fats) in the artery wall), cerebral infarction (stroke), and hypertension (elevated blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$84,023 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $19,503 — penalty dated 2025-05-21
- $64,520 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-11 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GATEWAY HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/09/2016 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2016 |
| GEHA, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 03/09/2016 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 03/01/2011 |
| SCHULTE, CORY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2016 |
| PEL VIP MEDICAL STAFFING | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2016 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/09/2016 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2016 |
| LITTLE BLUE HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2016 |
| STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175298. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.