Willow Point Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
6500 Greeley Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66104 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (913) 334-0200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,421 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.8% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 8.3% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 35.4 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff identified and reported an allegation of physical abuse immediately to the Administrator as required. On 02/09/24 between 10:30 PM to 11:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N and CNA M provided peri-care to Resident (R)1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). As staff rolled R1 towards CNA M, R1 hit CNA M. CNA M allegedly became upset and smacked R1 on the hand. CNA N attempted to report the abuse to Licensed Nurse (LN) G, but CNA M approached, so CNA N ended the conversation and walked away. CNA N mentioned it later to another CNA on shift but did not report it to the Administrator. On 02/12/24, over three days later, CNA N wrote a Report of Concern and left it in Administrative Staff A's box. On 02/13/24 at 07:45 AM, Administrative Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The facility identified 22 COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death) positive residents on 05/02/23. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff exercised appropriate infection control techniques to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. The facility failed to disinfect shared equipment used on COVID-19 positive negative residents. The facility failed to accurately identify COVID-19 positive resident rooms, inform staff of COVID-19 positive test results, and implement the required isolation, with the appropriate signage and personal protective equipment (PPE- gloves, gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles) designation for those positive residents. The facility further failed to ensure positive COVID-19 residents did not share a room with residents who tested negative. The facility failed to ensure staff used the appropriate PPE required when caring for COVID-19 positive residents; failed to use standards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-05-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired, dependent Resident (R) 38 remained free from abuse when the facility failed to prevent an episode of staff to resident physical abuse. On 05/01/23 at 07:55 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M brought R38 to the common area in a Broda (special wheelchair with tilt abilities) chair. CNA M then forcefully grabbed R38 by R38's right wrist/forearm multiple times while attempting to adjust R38's shirt and hair, despite the fact the resident raised her right arm in objection to the provision of cares. CNA M held R38's right arm tightly against R38's body and restricted R38's movement while R38 struggled against CNA M's grip. R38, who already had an older-appearing dime sized dark brown bruise on her inner right wrist, did not appear to have any physical injuries immediately after the interaction but became physically agitated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, facility failed to identify toileting as a causal factor for falls and implement toileting interventions after R40 experienced falls related to incontinence which resulted in an orbital socket (set of bones that surround the eye) injury. As a result, R40 had another toileting related fall in which she sustained a femur (large bone of upper leg) fracture. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R40's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, history of falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), reduced mobility, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and left femur fracture (broken bone in left upper leg). Review of R40' s Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify and implement appropriate, culturally aware, resident-centered interventions to address decreased intake for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 38, who was at risk for weight loss. This deficient practice resulted in a significant, unintended loss of 21.74 percent (%) in four months (between 01/01/23 through 05/04/23) . Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R38's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of intracerebral hemorrhage (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), fracture of left humerus (broken bone of the left upper arm), need for assistance with personal cares, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). A review of R38's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and one main dining area. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a certified dietary manager (CDM). This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs. Findings included: - On 10/22/24 at 07:20 AM Dietary BB stated she had not taken her test to get her dietary manager certification but was scheduled to take it on 11/16/24. Dietary BB stated that the registered dietician was available to call anytime but only came to the facility twice a month to review the residents' diet. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the CDM. The facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a CDM. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food items by the professional standards for food service safety. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful substances to food). Findings included: - Upon entry of the kitchen on 10/22/24 at 07:11 AM, observation revealed the coffee station table and the area had a dry, brown-tinged towel in front of the coffee maker. In the dishwasher area, there were two trays with dishes left from the night before that had not been washed. The dishwashing area had a musty odor. In the drink refrigerator, a pitcher of some sort of juice or drink was not labeled or dated. The pitcher of Kool-Aid lacked a label or date. There was a tray with 12 clear plastic drinking glasses filled with juice and three clear plastic drinking glasses filled with milk that lacked a cover, label, or date. The condiment refrigerator had a covered and labeled salad with a date of 10/18/24. Two covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 29 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a policy that prohibited hiring employees found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law when the facility failed to conduct background screening on two employees. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or mistreatment. Findings included: - On 10/23/24 at 09:00 AM a review of staffing for license verification, in-service training, and background checks was completed. An employee review of Licensed Nurse (LN) G revealed a hire date of 08/30/23. The facility was unable to provide evidence a criminal background check had been completed by the facility for LN G. An employee review of Housekeeping U revealed a hire date of 06/06/24. The facility was unable to provide evidence a criminal background check had been completed by the facility for her. On 10/23/24 at 10:45 AM Administrative Staff A stated he was not sure why the employees were missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of seven cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 10/22/24 at 07:04 AM an inspection of the 100-hall revealed the restorative room was left unlocked and unsupervised. An inspection of the sink area of the room revealed several types of multiple-purpose cleaners in an unlocked cabinet underneath the sink. The bottles contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. On 10/22/24 at 07:14 AM Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) stated the chemicals under the sink should be secured under the sink or the door should be closed. She stated chemicals should not be within reach of the residents. On 10/24/24 at 12:15 PM Administrative Nurse D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)24's bed rails were removed as indicated per her most current side rail assessment. The facility additionally failed to ensure that R5, R12, and R17 had safety assessments for the use of side rails that acknowledged the risks from their low air-loss mattresses, risk for entrapment, consent for the use of the side rails, and failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party were advised of the risks and/or benefits of the use of the side rails. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions and impaired safety related to the risks associated with the use of side rails. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R24's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 4 had foot pedals on her wheelchair while being pushed. This deficient practice left R4 vulnerable to accidents and injuries due to unmet care needs. Findings included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting right dominant side, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 18 received supportive care and services to promote and maintain his quality of life when the facility did not implement strategies to allow and promote R18, who had a primary language other than English to communicate his wants, needs, or feelings and promote socialization. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented cerebral infarction (stroke-sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)24's low air-loss mattress was set to the appropriate weight settings per her physician's order and current weight. This deficient practice placed R24 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R24's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication between the facility and Resident (R) 15's dialysis center. This deficient practice placed R15 at risk of potential adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), obesity, dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physicians' ordered parameters related to blood glucose monitoring for Resident (R)10 and R15. This deficient practice placed R10 and R15 at risk for delayed treatment of hyperglycemia (greater than the normal amount of glucose in the blood, hypoglycemia (abnormally low blood glucose), and unnecessary medication complications. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dysplasia (abnormal development of tissues and organs), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 31 residents. The sample included three residents with one resident reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 1 when the facility failed to assess, identify, record, respond to, and reassess R1's specific behaviors and triggers to promote an environment which supported R1's individualized care needs. This deficient practice created an environment that affected R1's ability to maintain his highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia [psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse between R1 and R2 to the State Agency (SA) within the mandated timeframe. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for unresolved and ongoing abuse. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia [psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought] and dementia progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with other behavioral disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/09/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R1 had hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to properly label and store food, failed to store clean dishes inverted, failed to prevent cross-contamination during puree (mechanically altered diet) and mechanical soft (mechanically altered diet) diet preparation, and failed to ensure staff wore hair nets appropriately in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the risk to spread foodborne illness to all affected residents. Findings included: - On 05/01/23 at 07:17 AM, the refrigerator revealed two uncovered pudding cups and an Italian dressing bottle with the lid partially on and dressing crusted around the opening. Plates were stored at the end of the steam table, not inverted, or covered to prevent contamination. On 05/01/23 at 07:19 AM, the freezers revealed a bag of strawberries that leaked to the shelf below it and a bag of unidentified meat patties, opened and not dated. On 05/01/23 at 07:19 AM, the dry storage revealed a bag of beans, opened and not dated; a bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) cares. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for four residents who required assistance from staff to complete the care. This deficient practice placed resident (R)103, R29, R4 and R18 at risk for potential skin breakdown and/or skin complications from not maintaining good personal hygiene and bathing practices. Findings included: - R103's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of failure to thrive and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, with a staff interview which revealed R103 had modified independence with cognitive skills, with some difficulty in new situations. The MDS documented R103 was independent with set up assistance for ADL.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample include 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities for the residents during weekends and failed to provide activities for residents in isolation. This deficient practice placed 45 residents at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Included: - The facility's Activity Calendar for February, March, and April of 2023 revealed the activities schedule for Saturdays and Sundays lacked activities listed on the activity calendar. On 05/01/23 at 08:45 AM Resident (R)46 reported she just got out of isolation due to COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory virus). She stated she is grateful for being out of isolation because she was bored in her room. She stated she was not provided activities or entertainment for over ten days in isolation. She stated she got bored of watching television but could not be around other residents. She stated the facility did not provide her with any type of human interaction or companionship…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and handling of the resident's medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors. Findings Included: - On 05/02/23 at 07:38 AM an inspection of the medication cart in the 100 Hall revealed one Novolog Flexpen (injectable short-acting hormone which regulates blood sugar) left unsecured and one Lispro Flexpen (injectable long-acting hormone which regulates blood sugar) left unsecured on top of the medication storage cart. On 05/04/23 at 01:05 PM an inspection of the Nurses medication storage room was completed. The inspection revealed the medication storage refrigerator temperature log was not being completed. An open cup pudding labeled March 2023 was inside the refrigerator. Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the refrigerator temperature and contents should be checked each shift. LN G immediately threw away the expired pudding. On 05/04/23 at 01:40 PM an inspection of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program to develop corrective actions plans and monitor them to correct identified quality deficiencies prior to survey. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective care. Findings Included: The facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired, dependent R38 (moderately cognitively impaired resident) remained free from abuse when the facility failed to prevent an episode of staff to resident physical abuse. (Refer to F600) The facility failed to ensure staff effectively communicated with R38 (moderately cognitively impaired resident the uses gestures and sign language to communicate) during ADL care. (Refer to F676) The facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for four residents who required assistance from staff to complete the care. This deficient practice placed resident (R)103, R29, R4 and R18 at risk for potential skin breakdown and/or skin complications from not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents sampled for immunization review. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain pneumococcal (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) vaccination signed consents or declinations for Resident (R) 4, R41, and R44 and the facility failed to administer pneumococcal vaccination after signed consent was obtained for R29. This deficient practice had the risk for physical complications and the risk to spread illness among residents, a high-risk population. Findings included: - R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He received Pneumovax on 02/26/18. R4's medical record lacked evidence a Prevnar vaccination was offered upon admission and/or evidence of a signed consent or declination for the Prevnar vaccination for R4. R41 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R41's medical record lacked evidence a pneumococcal vaccination was offered upon admission and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess and document resident-centered dietary and mealtime preferences for Resident (R) 18. This deficient practice had the risk for weight loss, and declines in psychosocial well-being and independence for R18. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), need for assistance with personal care, open wound to right foot, pressure ulcer of left heel, pressure ulcer of sacral region (large triangular bone between the two hip bones), stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle.Dead tissue may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling), malnutrition, and quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue the Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- the form used to notify Medicare A participants of their rights to appeal and the last covered date of service) form 10123, which contained the required information for Resident (R) 45. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired right to appeal. Findings included: - Review of R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had a Medicare Part A episode, which ended on 04/14/23. R45 did not remain in the facility and the facility did not issue a NOMNC 10123 to R45. On 05/04/23 at 03:15 PM Social Services X stated she was responsible for providing the NOMNC forms to the residents that discharged from Medicare Part A services. Social Services X stated she kept copies of the documents that were provided to the residents. The facility did not provide a policy on beneficiary notification. The facility failed to issue the NOMNC form 10123, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) cares. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for R103, which placed him at risk of impaired care related to unidentified or uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R103's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of failure to thrive and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, with a staff interview which revealed R103 had modified independence with cognitive skills, with some difficulty in new situations. The MDS documented R103 was independent with set up assistance for ADLs. The MDS documented bathing activity did not occur for R103 during the look back period. R103's ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure active discharge planning occurred for Resident (R) 51. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication of discharge goals and missed services for R51. Findings included: - R51 admitted to facility on 12/02/22 and discharged on 03/11/23. The Diagnoses tab of R43's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pulmonary cryptococcosis (fungal lung infection), malnutrition, hereditary ataxia (impaired ability to coordinate movement). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R51 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicates R51 was cognitively intact. The MDS further documented R51 required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), he was expected to remain in the facility, and no active discharge planning had occurred. The ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary including a recapitulation of stay for Resident (R) 51. This deficient practice placed the resident risk for miscommunication of services received during a stay in the facility and of post discharge care needs. Findings included: - R51 admitted to facility on 12/02/22 and discharged on 03/11/23. The Diagnoses tab of R43's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pulmonary cryptococcosis (fungal lung infection), malnutrition, hereditary ataxia (impaired ability to coordinate movement). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R51 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicates R51 was cognitively intact. The MDS further documented R51 required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), he was expected to remain in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with four reviewed for maintaining activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure staff effectively communicated with R38 during ADL care. This deficient practice placed R38 at risk for a decline in her ADLs and decreased psycho-social wellbeing. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R38's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of intracerebral hemorrhage (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), fracture of left humerus (broken bone of the left upper arm), need for assistance with personal hygiene, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). A review of R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 03/09/23 indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for treatment of pressure injuries. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate infection control practices during wound care for Resident (R) 18, who was on an antibiotic (medication used to treat bacterial infections) for a wound infection. This deficient practice placed R18 at risk of wound worsening and complications related to infections. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), need for assistance with personal care, open wound to right foot, pressure wound of left heel, pressure injuries of sacral region (large triangular bone between the two hip bones), stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized toileting interventions related to bowel and bladder incontinence for Residents (R)40, and R6. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to incontinence. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R40's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses muscle weakness, history of falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), reduced mobility, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and left femur fracture (broken bone in left upper leg). A review of R40's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/16/23 indicated a brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight noting moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store oxygen tubing and nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) in a sanitary manner for Resident (R) 33. This deficient practice placed R33 at increased risk to develop a respiratory infection. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide and the lungs are unable to carry the blood to the organs) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate dementia care and services for Resident (R) 38 (a cognitively impaired resident displaying dementia related symptoms). This deficient practice placed R38 at risk for preventable injuries and accidents as well as impaired quality of life. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R38's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of intracerebral hemorrhage (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), fracture of left humerus (broken bone of the left upper arm), need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were followed up for Resident (R) 33 related to an antihypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) which was held, and the physician was not notified. The facility failed to follow CP recommendations for antihypertensive medication administered outside of physician ordered parameters for R33 and R4. The facility also failed to notify the physician of blood sugars outside of ordered parameters for R33. This deficient practice had the potential for unnecessary medication use and possible adverse consequences and side effects. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (condition in which the blood does not have enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident (R) 33's antihypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure)), when staff held the medication and did not notify the physician, as ordered The facility failed to follow the consultant pharmacist recommendations for antihypertensive medication administered outside of physician ordered parameters for R33 and R4. The facility also failed to notify the physician of blood sugars outside of ordered parameters for R33. This deficient practice had the potential for unnecessary medication use and possible adverse consequences and side effects. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents sampled for COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by coronavirus, capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain signed consents or declinations for COVID-19 vaccinations for Resident (R) 44. This deficient practice had the risk for unwarranted physical complications and the risk to spread illness among residents, a high-risk population. Findings included: - R44 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His medical record lacked evidence a COVID-19 vaccination was offered upon admission. There was a lack of evidence of a signed consent or declination for COVID-19 vaccination for R44. On 05/04/23 at 02:14 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated when a resident admitted to the facility, she and medical records reviewed the resident's history for vaccination status and obtained consents. She stated she and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: - On [DATE] at 11:35 AM, Resident (R)6, who was alert and oriented, reported the facility staff tell him they did not have enough staff to provide him with his scheduled showers three nights a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. The resident reported he was lucky to get one bath a week. He stated the staff had to use a full body lift to transfer him and there has to be two staff present while they use the full body lift and they only have one CNA on each of the three halls and sometimes they did not even have that. There have been nights where there have only been one Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) on for all three halls. Review of R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 10/06/21 at 08:21 AM, and an environmental tour of the kitchen, on 10/12/21 at 10:05 AM, revealed the following concerns: 1. There were five skillets which lacked the non-stick surfaces, making them uncleanable. 2. Eight cookie sheets had a build-up of a black substance on the cooking surfaces and around the edges of the cookie sheets. 3. Three cutting boards had deep grooves, making them uncleanable. 4. The lids to two trash cans had dried food debris. 5. The inside of the microwave had dried food debris on the top and sides of the inside. 6. The reach-in refrigerator contained six left-over food items which were undated. 7. There were 25 containers of spices with sticky, dusty tops. On 10/12/21 at 10:05 AM, Dietary Staff BB and Administrative Staff A, stated the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary room cleaning in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. The facility failed to track and trend infections and causative organisms on an ongoing consistent manner (December 2020, January 2021, February 2021, July 2021, August 2021, and September 2021) to evaluate for the prevalence of organisms causing infections amongst the residents. Findings included: - Observation, on 10/07/21 at 02:59 PM, revealed housekeeping staff U, provided room cleaning to a room occupied by two residents. Housekeeping staff U donned gloves and sprayed a rag with Stride (a general-purpose cleaner for hard surfaces) and wiped one resident's over the bed table which contained the resident's water and personal items and, and with the same gloved hands and same rag, proceeded to wipe the roommate's over the bed table, which contained her personal items and water pitcher. Housekeeping Staff U proceeded to wipe the heating/cooling unit and windowsill. With the same gloved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure principles of antibiotic stewardship were followed by nursing staff to ensure antibiotics were used in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of the facility, Infection Control Surveillance Log revealed the following areas of concern for application of antibiotic stewardship: December 2020, lacked an Infection Control Surveillance Log. January 2021, lacked an Infection Control Surveillance Log, but did contain a log of antibiotics used in the facility which lacked organism identification for two residents with urinary tract infections and one resident with an unspecified bacterial infection. The log failed to assess compliance with the McGeer's Criteria (a systematic guide for antibiotic use based on criteria for specific infections which included culture sensitivity to antibiotic prescribed). February 2021, lacked an Infection Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for residents in the facility for resident rooms on two of the three resident halls. Findings included: - Observations during an environmental tour, on 10/13/21 at 07:56 AM, with Housekeeping and Maintenance staff V, included the following concerns: 1. One resident room had a build-up of grime on the floor around the parameter of the room and bathroom. The baseboards were peeled away from the wall next to the bathroom door. 2. A shared resident bathroom had a heavy build-up of a tannish substance on the base of the toilet. 3. Four shared resident rooms had chipped, peeling paint in the bathroom. The floor around the parameter of the room had a build-up of grime. 4. One resident room had a build-up of dirt in the corners of the floor. There were multiple dirty spots on the carpeting covering the wall. 5. One shared resident bathroom had missing molding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents and identified nine with restorative nursing programs. The 18 residents sampled included one other resident (not identified by the facility) Resident (R) 19 reviewed for restorative services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the planned and ongoing restorative nursing services to the one sampled resident and the nine identified residents including R5, R27, R37, R21, R25, R30, R41, R48, and R54, to maintain as much functional range of motion ability as possible. Findings included: - Resident (R)19's physician order sheet, dated 09/07/21, included diagnoses of acquired absence of left leg below knee, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and reduced mobility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had impairment in range of motion ability on one side of the lower extremities and received no restorative services. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented impairment in range of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents and the facility contained two medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate system to reconcile the discontinued medications from any residents with discontinued medications. Findings included: - Review of medication storage room for the 100 and 200 Halls, on 10/12/21 at 09:30 AM, identified a clear container with 32 medication cards with various medications including examples of Namenda and Potassium: six vials of an antibiotic (Cefazolin) used to mix with fluids and give intravenous (IV), four eye drops, and one inhaler. On 10/21/21 at 09:55 AM, Licensed Nurse L, revealed that the clear container contained medications to be destroyed or sent back to the pharmacy. She confirmed the medications did not have disposition documentation to accurately account for these discontinued medications upon reconciliation. When the medications were discontinued, they were removed from the cart and placed in the clear container without any tracking system. On 10/13/21 at 10:05 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 residents included in the sample, including one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure functional accommodation of needs for one Resident (R)19, regarding anti-tip brakes (brakes applied to wheelchair to help prevent falls) on his wheelchair. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R)19, included the following diagnoses: absence of left leg (amputation), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and history of a cerebral infarction (CVA) (stroke) - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed moderately impaired cognition. The resident was independent with locomotion on the unit with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 sampled which included one resident reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide choices for dependent Resident (R)6 related to his preferences for frequency, time, and type of bath. Findings included: - Review of resident (R) 6's Physician Orders, dated 9/7/21 revealed diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down including the trunk, legs, and arms), neurogenic (originating from the nerves or nervous system)bowel and bladder, multiple pressure (left hip, right hip, sacral region, and mid lateral right foot, and contracture (permanent shortening of the muscle, tendon or scar tissue producing deformaty or distortion) of the muscle at the right lower leg. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. He exhibited no behaviors. The resident reported preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents, with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized comprehensive plan of care for two of the 18 sampled Residents (R)18, regarding toileting and R 19, regarding Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R)18, documented a diagnosis of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint) of the bilateral lower extremities (both legs). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for toileting, had no toileting program and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/03/21, documented the resident required assistance of staff for toileting and was always incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with two sampled for discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, reconciliation, and disposition of the medications for resident (R)57. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R) 57's Physician Orders, dated 07/07/21, revealed diagnoses which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression, (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), anxiety, ( mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and urinary tract infection. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included the resident was admitted on [DATE], with the Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) not assessed due to the resident being unable to complete the assessment. He was independent with decisions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance to maintain cleanliness for three of the five sampled dependent Residents (R)6, R 18, and R 19, regarding bathing. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R)18, documented a diagnosis of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint) of the bilateral lower extremities (both legs). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. She required total assistance of two staff for bathing and had impairment on both sides of her lower extremities. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/03/21, documented the resident required staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 residents sampled which included one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers care and treatment. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident (R)6 with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, to promote healing, and prevent infection or decline in the resident's pressure ulcers. Findings included: - Review of the resident (R) 6's Physician Orders, dated 09/07/21, revealed diagnoses which included quadriplegia (affected by or related to paralysis of all four limbs, iron deficiency anemia ( a condition marked by deficiency of red blod cells), and stage three and four pressure ulcers (PU) of the left hip, right hip, sacral region, and right medial foot. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. He required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 residents sampled, which included five residents reviewed for indwelling catheter and incontinence care/treatment. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care/and treatment to prevent infection for two residents with indwelling catheters Residents (R)6 and R 9. The facility also failed to provide necessary care and treatment to maintain as much bladder function as possible for two sampled incontinent residents, R18 and R19. Findings included: - Review of Resident's (R)'s 6 Physician Orders, dated 09/07/21, revealed diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), pressure ulcers, neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), and chronic urinary tract infections (UTI). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident with Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 with 18 residents sampled for review including one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent complications including aspiration pneumonia and metabolic abnormalities for the one sampled resident with tube feedings, Resident (R) 51. Findings included: - The Order Summary Report, dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R) 51 included diagnoses of severe protein calorie malnutrition (state of inadequate intake of food), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose) and right above the knee amputation. The Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R51 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition, her weight of 79 pounds, and she received 26-50%, 501 ml (milliliters) a day or more in tube feeding. The Care Plan, dated 09/27/21, directed staff to check for tube placement and gastric contents/residual volume per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents, with 18 residents selected for review including one resident reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory services with the failure to label the oxygen tubing when changed, failure to label the distilled water container when opened and store it appropriately. These practices increased the risk for Resident (R)11 of developing a respiratory infection. Findings included: - The Order Summary Report, dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R)11, included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and acute respiratory failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set,(MDS), dated [DATE] assessed R11 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition and received oxygen therapy. The Care Plan, dated 07/09/21, included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 resident with 18 residents sampled which included five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's recommendation to resolve identified irregularities for Resident (R)16, related to insulin and antihypertensive medication. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R) 16's Physician Orders, dated 10/7/21, revealed diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Care Area Assessment (CAA) for Psychotropic Drug Use, dated 07/09/21, documentation included the resident received psychotropic medications to manage psychiatric illness/condition. A licensed nurse monitors for side effects every shift, and the physician is to be notified of any abnormal findings. A pharmacist consultant will review medications monthly and the Primary care physician (PCP) will review medications with each visit. Contributing factors include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 resident with 18 residents sampled which included five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medications related to the administration, monitoring for effectiveness, and side effects of insulin and antihypertensive medications as ordered by the physician for Resident 16. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R) 16's Physician Orders, dated 10/7/21, revealed diagnoses which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (high blood pressure), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), anxiety disorder mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents with 18 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)9 was kept free from unnecessary medications, by not reducing the order for Fluoxetine (an antidepressant medication used to treat depression), as ordered, in a timely manner. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/07/21, for Resident (R)9, documented a diagnosis of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness emptiness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident received an antidepressant medication seven of the seven days of the lookback period. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-05-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to post and provide daily nursing staff numbers and hours and failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for the required 18 months. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication regarding resident care and staffing. Findings included: Review of posted staffing from 02/01/23 to 04/30/23 revealed the following missing posted staffing dates: 02/11/23 - 02/13/23, 02/16/23 - 02/19/23, 02/22/23, 02/24/23 - 03/08/23, 03/10/23, 03/11/23, 03/15/23, 03/22/23, 03/24 - 03/28/23, 03/31/23 - 04/02/23, 04/04/23, 04/06/23, 04/08/23 - 04/30/23. On 05/04/23 at 02:14 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated nursing staff were responsible for completing posted staffing. Posted staffing was completed by the night shift nurse. She stated staff should be posted daily and provided upon request. The facility did not provide a policy related to Posted Staffing as requested on 05/04/23. The facility failed to post and provide daily nursing staff numbers and hours and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2021-10-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post Nurse Staffing information for Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, Certified Nurse Aides, the resident census, and the total number of actual hours worked by each category, daily as required. Findings included: - On initial tour of the facility, on 10/06/12 at 08:30 AM, the facility lacked a staff posting of required nurse staffing information for the date of 10/06/21. Review of the Staff Posting Sheets, revealed the facility did not have any of the required daily staff postings for April through October 2021. On 10/12/2021 at 09:04 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K stated she usually worked night shift and did not know who was responsible for posting the nurse staffing information. On 10/13/21 at 7:11 AM, Administrative Nurse D, reported she started working on 09/09/21. She stated the staff posting that was available on that day (09/09/21) was from March 2021, at least six months prior to her start date. She stated she expected the night shift nurse to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,421 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,421 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GATEWAY HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/16/2025 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2025 |
| LEWIS, CORWIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2026 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2025 |
| EPPERSON, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/08/2025 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/13/2025 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/05/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/16/2025 |
| MOUNT SUNFLOWER HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
| STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $222K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175135. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.