No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Healthcare Resort Of Leawood - Iron Horse Hlth

5401 W 143rd Street, Leawood, KS 66224 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (913) 249-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 249-3600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$12,418 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,418 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-11)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
5001 W 135th St · (913) 851-9903 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6261 WEST 135TH STREET
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.7%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.5%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%95.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.9%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.5%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.3%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.471.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.412.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
84.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.49hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 84.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.9%CMS range 52.7–68.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.1–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge84.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge86.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified49.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.4–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 59 residents with a census of 28 residents on the East unit. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) from bringing weapons into the facility and further failed to prevent gun violence between the two CNAs on the East unit. On 02/10/26 at approximately 03:28 AM, CNA M went down the Northeast (NE) corridor and unlocked the door that led to an exit outside. He then walked back down the hallway towards the nurses' station, pulled a gun out of his jacket, and fired multiple shots into the dining room where CNA N was located. CNA N returned an unknown number of rounds down the East Hall, where nine residents resided, with a bullet grazing the wall next to Resident (R) 2's room and a bullet, possibly the same one, hitting the doorframe of R1's room. CNA M ran down the NE hall and out of the NE corridor door while CNA N remained in the facility until law enforcement arrived. This deficient practice placed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-06 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 64 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five reviewed CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - Review of the facility's performance evaluation and in-service records revealed the following: CNA N, hired on 10/11/23, had no yearly performance evaluations provided upon request. On 08/06/25 at 12:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility did not have the required yearly performance evaluations for CNA N. She stated that yearly performance evaluations were completed annually for all CNA staff. The facility's Staff Requirement policy 07/2010 indicated performance reviews will be conducted on each employee at least annually to identify employee strengths and goals. The policy noted the evaluation will be utilized to determine training needs for the employee.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The facility had one kitchen and two kitchenettes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to a dirty top of the convection oven with a water bucket on the floor with dripping water, no hairnets worn, and improper food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness.Findings included:- During the initial tour on 08/04/25 at 07:14 AM, observation revealed the following:Dietary staff CC and dietary staff DD were not wearing hairnets in the kitchen.In the walk-in refrigerator, there was a steam table pan with hot dogs, hamburgers, a bowl with cut-up watermelon, a bowl of lettuce, and a steam table pan with corn salad that were not labeled and were undated. The foods were covered with cling wrap. The dishwasher had documented temperatures on 08/04/25 in the dishwasher temperature monitoring notebook for August. The top of the convection oven had dirt, black gloves, and pan cover sheets that were dirty. The convection oven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16, with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area and out of reach of eight cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to ensure Resident (R) 29's fall interventions were implemented. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents.Findings Included: - On 08/04/25 at 07:10 AM, an initial walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the Hallbrook unit revealed an unsecured soiled utility closet. An inspection of the closet revealed a bottle of solution under the sink. The bottle contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans, can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed.An inspection of the Hallbrook unit revealed an unsecured medical supply storage closet. An inspection of the closet revealed numerous medicated supplies. The bottles contained the warning, Keep out of reach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 64 residents. The facility identified two medication carts and two treatment carts. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to secure its two treatment carts. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors.Findings Included-- On 08/04/25 at 07:00 AM, an initial walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the Hallbrook unit revealed an unlocked treatment cart in the back nurses' station. An inspection of the cart revealed medical ointments and wound cleansers. An inspection of the Bridgewood unit revealed an unlocked treatment cart in the hallway. An inspection of the cart revealed medical ointments and wound cleansers. On 08/05/25 at 01:23 PM, an inspection of the medication storage room on the Hallbrook unit was completed. An inspection of the medication storage refrigerator revealed two vials of tuberculin serum. One vial was opened and lacked dates related to its opening and expiration. The second vial was opened on 05/30/25 and had passed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The facility identified 14 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store linens in a sanitary manner, the facility further failed to ensure dirty linens were not placed on the floor, and the facility further failed to ensure a barrier was placed on the countertop, before Accu-check (blood glucose monitoring test) monitor was laid on counter. The facility additionally failed to store Resident (R) 3 and R42's respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 08/04/25 at 07:05 AM, a walkthrough of the facility was completed.On 08/04/25 at 07:28 AM, towels, washcloths, and a bed sheet were laid on top of R42's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) cart in the hallway. On 08/04/25 at 01:18 PM, R3 sat in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent or declinations for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial infections), pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 12 and R75. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia.Findings included:- Review of R12's clinical record revealed a declination for PCV13 and PPSV23. The clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined, and lacked documentation of a historical administration. Review of R75's clinical record revealed the PPSV23 was administered on 09/14/18, and PCV13 was administered on 09/13/19. R75's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined, and lacked documentation of a historical administration. On 08/06/25 at 01:13 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was unsure what immunizations were offered. She stated she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with two reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 51 had a way to communicate her needs due to her call light being left out of reach. This deficient practice placed the R51 at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included:- The Medical Diagnosis section within R51's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, overactive bladder, need for assistance with personal care, history of falling, and cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). R51's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/08/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she required substantial to maximal assistance for transfer, bathing, toileting, bed mobility, dressing, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a final summary of the resident's status at discharge for Resident (R) 6. This deficient practice placed R6 at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs.Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis (an artificial body part), Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA- a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), pain, need for assistance with personal care, age related cognitive decline (related to the mental process), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R6's Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/13/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented she had an impairment of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with 16 reviewed for care planning. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify the level of care assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADL) on Resident (R) 54's care plan. This deficient practice placed R54 at risk for ineffective treatment and preventable accidents.Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R54's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/07/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order was followed for a daily weight for R5 to monitor for congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). This deficient practice placed R5 at risk of delayed treatment and untreated illness.Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of overactive bladder, pain, congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), cellulitis (a common bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of right lower limb, lack of coordination, communication deficit, need for assistance with personal car, closed fracture with routine healing, and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing devices were in place for Resident (R) 12, who was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. This deficient practice placed R12 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown.Findings included:- R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of difficulty walking, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/22/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3's nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask was stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R3 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), benign prostatic hyperplasia (urinary frequency, urgency, a weak or intermittent stream, needing to strain, a sense of incomplete emptying, and nocturia (frequent urination at night), acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory disorder where narrowed or blocked blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs, affection the arms, hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory test results for Resident (R) 42, R5, and R75 were included in the clinical record. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment.Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of Overactive bladder, pain, congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), cellulitis (a common bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of right lower limb, lack of coordination, communication deficit, need for assistance with personal car, closed fracture with routine healing, and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 13. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Findings included:- R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue, and severe sleep disturbance), hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory disorder where narrowed or blocked blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs, often affection the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and two kitchenette serving areas. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff appropriately dated, labeled, and stored opened foods. This deficient practice had the potential for food borne illnesses for residents. Findings included: - On 11/13/23 at 07:37 AM during the initial tour of the facility's main kitchen observation revealed an opened box of cream of wheat in the dry storage area with a piece of plastic wrap over the top of the box; it was not in a sealed bag/container. There was a bag of spaghetti that was wrapped in plastic wrap that did not have a date on it. On 11/13/23 at 07:40 AM observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed an open gallon plastic container of hard-boiled eggs. The lid was not closed to the container and there was no label that indicated the open date. There was an opened bag of diced potatoes that was not labeled and/or dated and was not stored in a sealed bag. There was an opened bag of pepperoni in a box…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 63. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately address and resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and impaired quality of life. Findings Included- - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes from 11/2022 through 11/2023 indicated the council had recurring concerns with staff not verifying meal tickets, offering choices, availability of snacks and fruits and vegetables, not taking orders before meal service, and posting the daily menus. Further recurring issues were call light response times. The Resident Council Minutes form instructed any old business that was unresolved be moved to new business. The 11/2022 Resident Council Minutes documented new business (concerns) that meal menus were not displayed, there were no snacks and fruit and/or vegetables were not always available. Further concerns included nursing staff were not asking the residents what they wanted or offering choices,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for grievances. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately resolve Resident (R)26's grievances related to her ongoing dietary concerns. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R26s Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, abnormal posture, and multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/22/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted she required set-up assistance from meals. The MDS noted no weight loss or swallowing disorders. R26's Nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure rooms containing hazardous materials out of reach of 17 cognitively impaired /independently mobile residents. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings included: - On 11/13/23 at 07:08AM a walkthrough of the facility revealed two Spa rooms with doors propped open. Both rooms contained boxes of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) testing kits in an unsecured closet. Both rooms had opened germicidal cylindrical containers of wipes stored on counter with the Keep out of reach from children warning. Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) N secured the room. She reported the rooms should not be left open and unattended. On 11/16/23 at Licensed Nurse H stated cleaning solutions and hazardous chemicals should be locked in the cabinets when not in use or closely monitored. On 11/16/23 at 02:23PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care, disinfecting shared equipment, and storage of oxygen tubing when not in use. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 11/13/23 at 09:26 AM Resident (R) 18 sat in his wheelchair in his room with a nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) on. In R18's bathroom, there was an oxygen concentrator (a device that provides supplemental oxygen) and the nasal cannula was lying on the floor. R18's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - a machine that used mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) mask was draped over the bedrail and not stored in a bag. Observation on 11/14/23 at 04:10 PM R15 laid on her bed. Her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident's rights and dignity were respected by staff when Resident (R) 16 and R1, both dependent residents, sat at the dining table as staff stood in between these residents to assist them with eating. This placed the residents at risk for decreased self-esteem and impaired dignity. Findings included: - On 11/13/23 at 12:48 PM R16 sat in his wheelchair at a dining room table and R1 sat in her Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) on the other side of the same table. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stood in between R16 and R1 while she assisted the two residents to eat. On 11/16/23 at 01:14 PM CNA N stated that staff should sit down beside a resident when assisting them to eat. CNA N stated staff should not ever stand to assist a resident to eat to respect their dignity. On 11/16/23 at 01:27 PM Licensed Nurse G stated staff should be seated next to a resident while assisting with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Resident (R)26, R4, and R15. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for infections, skin breakdown, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R26's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord)., major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, abnormal posture, and multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/22/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the standard of care was provided during catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care and failed to prevent the catheter drainage bag from touching the floor for Resident (R)15 who had a history of frequent urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). This deficient practice placed R15 at risk of catheter related complications and further UTIs. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the muscles that control the flow of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents sampled for nutrition. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ordered dietary supplements, to promote increased calorie intake, were monitored for effectiveness and failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained as ordered for Resident (R) 59. This deficient practice placed R59 at risk for continued weight loss and possible malnutrition. Findings included: - R59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting left side, generalized muscle weakness, other lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported that Resident (R) 18's pulse was not being monitored as physician ordered prior to administration of carvedilol (beta blocker-medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure). This placed R18 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R18 documented diagnosis of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), coronary artery disease (CAD- abnormal condition that may affect the flow of oxygen to the heart), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/25/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dosing instructions for Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel for Resident (R) 15. The facility also failed to follow physician ordered parameters for R18's antihypertensive beta-blocker (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure). This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications for the affected residents. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents with three reviewed for dietary preferences. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow Resident (R)26's cultural dietary preferences. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and weight loss. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R26s Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, abnormal posture, and multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/22/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted she required set-up assistance from meals. The MDS noted no weight loss or swallowing disorders. R26's Nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA) completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to handle linens appropriately in order to reduce transmission of infectious diseases when the facility failed to cover clean laundry while delivering to resident rooms, and wear protective equipment (gown) when sorting soiled linens. The facility further failed to ensure appropriate use of cleaning products and techniques for disinfection of clostridioides difficile (C-Diff- a bacterium that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon which can be life-threatening) rooms which placed the residents and staff at increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 03/02/22 at 02:11 PM, observation revealed Housekeeping Staff V rolled an uncovered cart with clean, folded, and hanging clothes to resident rooms. On 03/02/22 at 02:22 PM during inspection of the facility's laundry area, Housekeeping Staff V explained she wore gloves and no gown while sorting of the soiled laundry. She further stated she had not been informed of a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 50, upon admission. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate care. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R50 recorded diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (when a body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), and malignant neoplasm of lower inter quadrant of the left breast (breast cancer). R50's EMR recorded the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R50's EMR lacked documentation a baseline care plan was developed upon admission to the facility. The Nurse's Note, dated 01/14/22 at 12:27 PM, documented R50 had been living at home with home health services and had become weak and required more assistance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 39, who had a fluid restriction related to his dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform). This placed R39 at risk of complications related to fluid overload or dehydration. Findings include: - R39's diagnoses include end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis, polycystic kidney disease (noncancerous sacs of fluid on the kidneys that lead to need of dialysis), obesity (condition of being overweight), and anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 02/09/22, recorded R39 had intact cognition, required supervision to extensive assistance with activities of daily living, on a therapeutic diet, and received dialysis. The Nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/27/21, recorded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three reviewed for skin condition not pressure related. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent skin tears for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 157, who received two skin tears during cares. This placed R157 at risk for further injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R157 documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (sudden loss of circulation to an area of the brain that results in an acute loss of cerebral function), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and displaced fracture of the later malleolus of the left fibula (broken ankle). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R157 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The MDS further documented the resident did not have any skin issues. The Skin Integrity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident (R) 49 that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) summary of the resident's stay in the facility. This placed R49 at risk for miscommunication or interruptions in the continuum of care after discharge. Findings included: - R49's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not completed for R49. The Discharge Care Plan, dated 01/19/22, directed staff to establish a pre-discharge plan with R49 and care giver and to evaluate and revise the plan as needed as the resident wished to return to home. R49's admission Social Service Assessment, dated 01/21/22, documented the resident had a care giver at home and the resident planned to discharge to home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one reviewed for communication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to use alternative communication methods for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 17, who had a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with any aspect of communication that is affected by disruption of cognition). This placed the resident at risk for ineffective communication and frustration. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R17 had diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, cerebral infarction (sudden loss of circulation to an area of the brain that results in an acute loss of cerebral function), vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by decreased blood flow to the brain), and Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three reviewed for skin condition not pressure related. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin tears for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 157, who received two skin tears during cares. This placed R157 at risk for further injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R157 documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (sudden loss of circulation to an area of the brain that results in an acute loss of cerebral function), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and displaced fracture of the later malleolus of the left fibula (broken ankle). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R157 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The MDS further documented the resident did not have any skin issues. The Skin Integrity Care Plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a physician ordered fluid restriction for Resident (R) 39, who had dialysis treatment. This placed R39 at risk of complications related to fluid overload or dehydration. Findings include: - R39's diagnoses include end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis, polycystic kidney disease (noncancerous sacs of fluid on the kidneys that lead to need of dialysis), obesity (condition of being overweight), and anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 02/09/22, recorded R39 had intact cognition, required supervision to extensive assistance with activities of daily living, on a therapeutic diet, and received dialysis. The Nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered per physician orders for Resident (R) 158. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased well-being and ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R158 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and Parkinson's Disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). R158's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The Cognition Care Plan, dated 09/16/21, documented R158 was at risk for impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,418 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,418 — penalty dated 2026-02-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GATEWAY HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/22/2015
BOHRER, TRACYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2025
BURNAM, SOONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/04/2015
GEHA, CHRISTOPHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2020
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2025
KEETCH, CHADIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2025
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2025
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 37%Medicare 9%Other / private 53%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,002per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175558. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next