No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Shawnee Post Acute Rehabilitation Center

7600 Antioch Road, Overland Park, KS 66204 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 101 certified beds · (913) 383-2001 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 383-2001 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$28,558 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,558 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8800 W 75th St · (913) 362-2229 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
(913) 642-6330 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7937 Santa Fe Dr · (913) 341-1775 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Young's Park Overland Park Kansas · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.9%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.7%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.6%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.3%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.8%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.281.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.542.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.1%CMS range 47.6–64.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.8–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified68.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.4–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 85.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-18)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    TThe facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain accurate weights and verify weight changes related to Resident (R)28's physician-ordered weekly weights to effectively monitor weight trends and identify concerns before a significant weight loss occurred. The facility further failed to ensure staff served R28 a diet he could safely consume. As a result of the deficient practices, R28 had a significant unplanned weight loss of 28.38 percent (%) within one month. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Metal Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 17 residents with seven reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to an unplanned, ongoing weight loss and failed to identify and implement further interventions to prevent weight loss for Resident (R)22 who had a significant unplanned weight loss of 14.29 percent ( in six months. Findings included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, macular degeneration (progressive deterioration of the retina), glaucoma (abnormal condition of elevated pressure within an eye caused by obstruction to the outflow), abnormal weight loss, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), dysphagia (swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate glove changing and hand hygiene for two residents, Resident (R) 18 and R52, when they did not remove their soiled gloves after incontinence care and continued to touch other surfaces and resident belongings.Findings included:- On 02/17/26 at 07:40 AM, Certified Nurse Aide M pushed R18 in her wheelchair to the bathroom and put on clean gloves. CNA M locked the wheelchair, put her right hand under R18's left arm, and R18 grabbed the bar on the wall by the toilet and stood up. CNA M pulled down R18's pants and incontinence brief, and R18 sat down on the toilet. CNA M removed and discarded her incontinence brief and put on a clean one. CNA M had R18 stand so she could perform incontinence care. When CNA M was finished, she pulled up the incontinence brief with the same soiled gloves and pulled up R18's pants. CNA M transferred R18 back into her wheelchair, pushed her up to the sink, picked up R18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and privacy related to nasal spray administration, and having an uncovered urinary collection bag visible to guests and other residents. Findings included: - On 02/17/26 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed R8's urinary collection bag sat between his legs in the wheelchair, as he propelled through the dining room. Continued observation revealed R8's urinary collection bag lacked a dignity cover and was half full of yellow urine. On 02/18/26 at 08:40 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff should not administer nasal spray at the dining room table and staff should take the resident to her room or a private area. Administrative Nurse D verified the residents catheter bag should be covered and urine not visible. The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 03/01/25, documented, each resident would be treated with kindness, dignity and respect including privacy in treatment and in the care of personal needs.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) medication for Resident (R) 2. The facility also failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale, which included multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefit reviews for the continued use of antipsychotic medication for R 78, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure).Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of altered mental status, schizoaffective (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with 2 reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO- a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) and failed to provide the residents with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital for two residents, (R) 51 and R1. Findings included: - The Nurse's Notes dated 02/17/25 at 04:35 PM, documented R51 admitted to the acute care hospital for wound surgery. The Nurse's Note dated 04/02/25 at 01:13 PM documented R51 returned to the facility on a stretcher, transported by Medical Transport company. R51 had multiple wounds that were clean, dry and intact. R51's clinical record lacked a bed hold policy and a resident or resident representative signature. R51's clinical record lacked documentation staff notified the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of R51 s discharge from the facility to the hospital. On 02/18/26 at 08:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with one reviewed for communication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used alternative communication methods for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 18, who had a language barrier and spoke in Farsi (Persian).Findings included:- R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18 had long and short-term memory problems with severely impaired decision-making skills. R18 required partial staff assistance with dressing, showers, toileting hygiene, mobility, and transfers. The MDS documented R18 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents with one resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the physician ordered foam dressings to protect the skin integrity of Resident (R) 3's bilateral hand contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of contracture of the left and right hands, and hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body).R3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R3 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). R3's Functional Abilities (Self Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/14/25, documented she continued to use a Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with tilt and recline) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one resident, Resident (R) 52, who sustained a skin tear after staff lowered her to the ground and was not using a gait belt during ambulation.Findings included: - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), repeated falls, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on the feet.The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R53 was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, and required partial staff assistance with transfers and personal hygiene. R52 had no functional impairment to upper or lower extremities and had no falls.The Fall Risk Assessments, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician responded to the recommendation made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) to ensure that Resident (R)78's antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication Seroquel had an appropriate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (MS) indication for use.Findings included:- R78's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), delusional misidentification syndrome (a group of rare psychiatric disorders characterized by persistent false beliefs that people, places, or objects have been replaced, transformed, or duplicated), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, anxiety (mental or emotional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 79 residents. The facility had five medication carts and four medication rooms. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an opened vial of tuberculin (a purified protein derivative used in skin tests to help diagnose tuberculosis [a contagious infection primarily attacking the lungs, though it can affect other organs]) in the medication room, was dated upon being opened. The facility also failed to ensure stock medication/supplements on a medication cart were not expired. Findings included: - On 02/17/26 at 07:23 AM an observation of the [NAME] Bend-1 hall medication room revealed the medication refrigerator contained an opened vial of tuberculin lacked an open date (expiration date of 11/28). On 02/17/26 at 07:25 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated she was not sure when the vial of tuberculin was opened but said it should have an open date written on the label. LN H stated she would discard the vial of tuberculin. The facility's Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and four dining areas. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a certified dietary manager (CDM). This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs. Findings included: - On 03/26/24 at 11:28 AM Dietary BB stated he and Dietary CC had not completed the course yet to become a CDM. Dietary BB stated he and Dietary CC had begun the courses. Dietary BB stated both himself and Dietary CC had completed the ServSafe class and said he would provide a copy of the certification. The facility did not provide a policy for Qualified Dietary Staff but did provide the Federal regulation guideline 483.60(a)(1). The facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services was a certified dietary manager. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff received the required communication training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: - On 03/27/24 at 11:40 AM a review of the facility's training for Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) PP, CNA QQ, Licensed Nurse (LN) L, LN NN, and LN OO revealed the following: CNA PP's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for communication. The file noted she passed abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) and a mental health course. CNA QQ's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for communication. The file noted she had ANE and mental health courses. LN L's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for communication. The file noted she had ANE training and mental health courses. LN NN's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all staff were educated on the rights of the residents and the facility's responsibility to provide proper care. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: -On 03/27/24 at 11:40 AM a review of the facility's training for Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) PP, CNA QQ, Licensed Nurse (LN) L, LN NN, and LN OO revealed the following: CNA PP's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for resident rights. The file noted she passed abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) and a mental health course. CNA QQ's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for resident rights. The file noted she had ANE and mental health courses. LN L's facility-provided credentialling file lacked documented and completed training completed for resident rights. The file noted she had ANE training and mental health courses. LN NN's facility-provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's in-service records revealed the following: CNA N, hired 06/07/19, had 3.50 hours of in-service education in the past 12 months. On 03/27/24 at 08:10 AM Administrative Staff A stated staff had from February through October to complete their yearly education and that the system flagged all of the staff that completed their assigned education for the year. Administrative Staff A stated CNA N's record showed their education as completed in the system and he was unsure as to why the system had reported so few hours. Administrative Staff A stated he compared CNA N's record with another CNA and found that the assigned education was not the same. Administrative Staff A further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents and two medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a consistent reconciliation of controlled drugs at the end of each work shift. This placed the 14 residents with controlled substances on the cart at risk for misappropriation of medications. The facility also failed to ensure Resident (R) 42's physician-prescribed medication was available from the pharmacy for administration. This placed R42 at risk for ineffective medication regimen and related complications. Findings included: - On 03/26/24 at 08:14 AM, observation on the Maple Hill One medication cart Controlled Drug Record flow sheet lacked evidence the staff completed the narcotic reconciliation for day shifts on 02/01/24, 02/02/24, 02/03/24, 02/04/24, 02/09/24, 02/10/24, 02/12/24, 02/16/24, 02/19/24, 02/23/24 02/26/24, 02/27/24, 03/01/24, 03/02/24 03/03/24, 03/04/24, 03/07/24, 03/08/24, 03/09/24, 03/15/24, 03/16/24, 03/17/24, 03/18/24, 03/22/24, and 03/25/24, for night shifts; 02/01/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and four kitchenettes with dining areas. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored, prepared and served food items and maintained the freezer unit in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness, and cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful substances to food). Findings included: - Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 03/25/24 at 07:15 AM revealed in the kitchen storage freezer were two open bags of fried potatoes that had no label or date and were not in a sealed bag. The walk-in freezer unit leaked and had ice around some of the pipes. The walk-in freezer had an area of what appeared to be water that had dripped from the freezer unit and froze on the floor. Observation during the lunchtime services of food on 03/25/24 at 12:23 AM in the Maple Hills 2 dining area revealed that plates, bowls, and saucers were stored right-side up on the counter. An unidentified dietary staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 21 was treated with respect, and dignity related to personal hygiene, and the facility also failed to ensure a dignified dining experience when staff stood over R25 and R57 instead of sitting beside him while assisting them with meals. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased dignity. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. The facility identified 54 residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notification (SNF ABN) form 10055 (the form used to notify Medicare A participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) with the required information for Resident (R) 49 and R 336. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired decision-making. Findings included: - R49's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 12/19/23 and ended on 03/09/23. R49 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility issued SNF ABN 10055 lacked an estimated cost for continued services. R336's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 12/11/23 and ended on 01/03/24. R336 remained in the facility for custodial care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents sampled for hospitalization and one resident sampled for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to Resident (R) 27 and R43 or their representative for their facility-initiated transfers and/or discharge. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R27 and R43. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R27 documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis and muscle weakness on one side of the body after a stroke), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/19/23 documented R27 had both short…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents sampled for hospitalization and discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold with the required information to Resident (R) 43 or to their family representative when R43 was transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R43 at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or his same room. Findings include: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R 43 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) effecting left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Residents (R)28 and R17. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infections and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of ten indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he had no behaviors. The MDS indicated he used a wheelchair and was dependent on staff for mobility. The MDS indicated he had no upper or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing measures were placed on Resident (R) 57's and R36's bilateral lower extremities. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of developing pressure ulcers and worsening of current wounds. Findings included: - R57's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat, not eating enough of the right things, or being unable to use the food that one does eat), pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for position and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 57 was provided services and treatment to prevent her contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) from worsening in her left and right hands. This deficient practice left R57 at risk for further decline and decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). or mobility. Findings included: - R57's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat, not eating enough of the right things, or being unable to use the food that one does eat), pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards resulting in Resident (R)28's non-injury fall in the facility's spa room. The facility additionally failed to implement wandering interventions for R28 and failed to provide safe transferring practices for R25. These deficient practices placed both residents at risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Metal Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to follow standards of practice related to sanitary catheter care for Resident (R)50. This deficient practice placed R25 at risk for complication-related urinary tract infections (UTI). Finding included: - R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), and generalized muscle weakness. The admission /Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 08/24/23, documented R50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R50 required partial to moderate assistance with bathing and lower body dressing. The MDS further documented R50 had an indwelling catheter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for dialysis (blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for Resident (R) 46. This deficient practice placed R46 at risk of delayed services, potential adverse outcomes, and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R46's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on renal dialysis. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 10/09/23, documented R46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R46 was independent of activities of daily living (ADL) and received dialysis services. The Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/09/23, documented R46 was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)28's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%) when staff failed to administer Resident (R)62 ' s medications as ordered. This resulted in a medication error rate of 26.67%. Findings included: - R62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under Physician ' s Orders revealed the following: An order dated 12/30/23 instructing to administer 400 milligrams (mg) of Gabapentin (medication used to treat nerve pain) via an enteral (within or via the small intestine) tube each morning for neuromuscular pain. An order dated 12/30/23 instructing to administer 200 mg of Amiodarone (medication used to treat irregular heart rhythms) via enteral tube each morning for irregular heartbeat. An order dated 12/30/23 instructed to administer one tablet of Sennoside docusate (laxative) via enteral tube each morning for constipation. An order dated 12/29/23 instructing to administer 5 mg of Eliquis (medication used to prevent the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 17 was free from significant medication errors when staff failed to administer insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) and antihypertensive (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications as ordered. This placed R17 at risk for adverse side effects and medical complications. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R17 documented diagnosis of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel). R17's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/24/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R17 required extensive assistance from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for nutritional diets. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow Resident (R)28's specialized dietary requirements during meal services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition and aspiration (inhaling foreign material or vomit). Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R28 had no behaviors. The MDS indicated he used a wheelchair and was dependent on staff for mobility. The MDS indicated he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a communication process was implemented, which included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, and a failed to describe the services and equipment provided to Resident (R) 21 by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services and impaired physical, and psychosocial care for R21. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents where on transmission-based precautions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene, the disinfecting of shared equipment, and the replacement of respiratory equipment. The facility also failed to ensure laundry temperatures for laundry including laundry from transmission-based precaution rooms with infectious diseases were assessed for appropriate temperatures. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - Observation on 03/25/24 at 10:52 AM Resident (R) 56's oxygen tubing was dated 01/03/24. R56 stated he asked staff to change the oxygen tubing and staff informed him the facility did not have long enough tubing to replace it. Observation on 03/26/24 at 08:14 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G pushed her medication cart down the hallway and stopped at R29's room. LN G donned gloves pushed the vitals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 80 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 42, R27, and R23 with the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial infections) as consented. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia. Findings included: - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was eligible and within the required vaccination date range to receive the PCV20 vaccination. A review of Resident Consent for Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19 Vaccination form for R42 dated 10/19/23 provided by the facility revealed a signed consent to receive the pneumococcal vaccination. The form indicated R42 was provided educational information related to the vaccination but never received the PCV 20 vaccination. The facility was unable to provide evidence the PCV20 was administered to R42. R27's EMR revealed he was eligible and within the required vaccination date range to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 79 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for grievances. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to log grievances received from or about Resident (R) 1 and failed to record actions taken and provide a resolution to the resident and/or representatives regarding the grievances. This deficient practice placed the residnet at risk for unresolved grievances and decreased quality of care. Findings include: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, listed diagnoses of chronic congestive heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath); cognitive communication deficit (communication problems that have an underlying cause in a cognitive deficit- like from a stroke); generalized anxiety (a condition with exaggerated tension, worrying, and nervousness about daily life events), and depression (a mental state of low mood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a system that all staff implemented for residents to file grievances . This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings included: - Review of the resident council meeting minutes for the past year, lacked documentation residents reported grievances concerning Resident (R) 2's behaviors. Review of the facility's grievance log for the past year, lacked documentation residents reported grievances concerning R2's behaviors. The facility's Progress Note, dated 10/04/22 at 09:35 PM, recorded R2 had disruptive yelling behaviors throughout the afternoon, staff were not able to redirect the resident's behaviors, and other residents voiced complaints and threatened to call the police about R2's behaviors. The Progress Note also recorded a resident's family contacted the nurse, complained their family member was not able to sleep due to R2's yelling, and demanded a room change for their family member. On 10/03/22 at 12:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner for two of the five kitchenettes in the facility. This placed the affected residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings Included: - On 10/03/22 at 08:30 AM, during tour of the facility kitchenette, observation of the temperature logs of [NAME] one and Maple two daily food temperature logs lacked evidence staff assessed temperature of the following meals: Willow one: Review of the weekly unit temperature logs from September 25 until October 1, 2022 revealed the 09/26/22 supper meal lacked documented temperatures. Review of the weekly unit temperature logs form August 28 until September 3, 2022 revealed the 09/28/22 supper meal lacked documented temperatures. Review of the weekly temperature logs from August 14 -20, 2022 revealed the 08/17/22 supper meal lacked documented temperatures. Maple two: Review of the weekly temperature logs from July 20-30, 2022 lacked temperatures of the lunch meal on 07/24/22 and the supper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report Resident (R) 4's allegation of verbal, emotional, and physical abuse to State Agency (SA) as required. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk of ongoing abuse. Findings included: -The Medical Diagnosis section withing R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents of which seven were reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a soft heel boot as directed by the provider to treat a facility-acquired pressure ulcer for Resident (R)71. This placed R71 at risk for further skin breakdown and delayed healing. Findings included: - R71's Physician Order Sheet dated 10/03/22, included diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), cerebrovascular accident (CVA- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and right-side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). R71's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents with two reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health services and interventions for one of two sampled residents, Resident (R) 2. This placed the resident at risk for continued and worsened behaviors. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 09/02/22, recorded R2 had diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the blood that impairs brain function), anxiety (mental health disorder characterized by worry and fear that interferes with daily life), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness and worthlessness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (cognitively intact) and no behaviors. The MDS recorded R2 required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a system where staff acknowledged, reported to the physician, and acted upon the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations for Resident (R) 6 who received routine insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar). This placed the resident at risk for complications related to high or low blood sugar levels. Findings included: - R6's Medical Diagnosis section withing the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage) and multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain blood sugar parameters for Resident (R) 6 who received routine insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar). This placed the resident at risk for complications related to high or low blood sugar levels. Findings included: - R6's Medical Diagnosis section withing the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage) and multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review , and interview, the facility failed to secure a treatment cart and appropriately store and label multiple-dose insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) pens (an injection device) located on the second-floor nursing unit for Resident (R) 59, R24 and R53. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective medication and allowed unsafe access to medications. Findings included: - On 09/28/22 at 08:09 AM, during initial tour, observation revealed the medication cart had insulin pens which were not dated when opened for R59 and R24. On 09/28/22 at 08:25 AM, during initial tour, observation revealed an unattended treatment cart located in the hall, which was unlocked and unattended. The unlocked treatment cart drawers contained multiple insulin pens. R53's multidose insulin pen lacked a date when opened. On 09/28/22 at 08:09 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified R59 and R24 lacked opened dates on the insulin pens. LN G stated the pens should have been labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 79 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare a pureed diet using professional standards to maintain nutritive and palatable value for three residents, Resident (R)22, R23, and R52. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 10/03/22 at 11:00 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC prepared three pureed diets. DS CC placed three servings (approximately three ounces each serving) of lemon peppered chicken in a food processor/blender. DS CC blended the chicken, added an unmeasured amount of chicken broth, to the pureed texture, then emptied the chicken into three stainless-steel food storage pans, then stored the pans in the oven. DS CC placed three servings (approximately four ounces each serving) of macaroni salad in a food processor/blender. DS CC blended the macaroni salad, added one half cup of milk, then blended to the correct pureed texture, emptied the macaroni salad on to the divided plates. Continued observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,558 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $28,558 — penalty dated 2024-03-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GATEWAY HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/28/2014
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/28/2014
GEHA, CHRISTOPHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2025
JIMENEZ, LUISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2025
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2014
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
LEWIS, CORWINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2021
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2015
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 9%Other / private 37%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$364per resident / day
operating cost
$11,080per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175550. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next