Owenton Healthcare and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident (R)3). R3 began vaginal treatment with Monistat 7 (antifungal vaginal cream) for a yeast infection on 11/29/2024. R3 had complaints of pain and discomfort. The facility transferred R3 to a hospital on [DATE]. At the hospital, R3 had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed which revealed the resident had a foreign object present in her vaginal canal, which was later determined to be a Monistat vaginal cream applicator. R3 stated the whole situation was unnecessary, caused her unnecessary pain and was humiliating. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Provision of Quality Care, revised 02/01/2024, revealed based on comprehensive assessments, the facility was to ensure residents received treatment and care by qualified persons in accordance with professional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for two (Resident (R) 60 and R70) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Resident-to-resident abuse occurred in two different incidents. On 10/02/2025, R60 swatted R70 and made contact with the resident's chest. On 10/27/2025, R65 hit R60 on the shoulder. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, reviewed 06/2025, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Per the policy, Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include.certain residents to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (R) 4) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition received their diet as ordered. R4, who was at nutritional risk, failed to receive his physician-ordered therapeutic diet for additional protein and fortified foods. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Therapeutic Diet Orders, reviewed 06/2025, indicated, Policy: The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. The policy specified, 5. Dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed. Review of a resident demographic record revealed the facility admitted R4 on 11/28/2019. According to the resident demographic record, the resident had a medical history that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes for 7 of 28 sampled residents (R). R1, R5, R22, R36, R61, R64 and R76 were observed in the dining room consuming meals without the assistive devices or nutritional supplements they had been care planned to receive. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 02/28/2024, revealed it was the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. 1. Review of the Face Sheet for R1 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/01/2005, with diagnoses to include; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for 5 of 7 sampled residents (R) 61, R36, R22, R76 and R64. Observation during the noon meal service on 08/06/2024 at 12:17 PM, revealed the facility failed to provide residents with their nutritional supplements and double portions as ordered by the physician. The findings include: 1. Review of the Face Sheet located in R61's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/03/2024, with diagnoses that included; dementia, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for R61 dated 07/07/2024, revealed the facility assessed the resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS further revealed the facility assessed the resident as dependent on staff for eating. Review of a physician's order for R61…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0810 — pattern
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide special adaptive equipment and utensils for residents who needed them when consuming meals and snacks for 5 of 15, out of 28 sampled residents, (R)1, R5, R22, R76, and R64. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Adaptive Self Feeding Devices, undated, revealed the use of adaptive, self-help feeding devices was encouraged when determined to be helpful to the resident. Continued review revealed the dietary department was responsible for all sanitizing of adaptive utensils after each use and for placing the devices on the meal trays as needed. 1. Review of the Resident Face Sheet for R1 revealed the facility admitted the resident to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed R1 to have a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 3 of 23 sampled residents (R)2, R48, R86. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights dated 01/02/2020, and revised 02/16/2024, revealed the facility ensured all staff were educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents. Further review of the policy revealed the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation reviewed/revised 08/2023, revealed the facility was to protect the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prevented abuse. Continued review revealed the abuse prohibition plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 23 sampled residents (R), R86. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation reviewed/revised 08/2023, revealed the facility was to protect the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prevent abuse. Continued review revealed instances of abuse of residents could cause harm, pain, or mental anguish, and the facility was to make efforts to ensure all residents were protected during an investigation. Review of the facility investigation for an incident involving R86 on 10/25/2023 at around 11:30 AM, revealed the resident alleged Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 hit his/her leg. Continued review revealed the facility sent the CNA home for the day. Further review revealed education for CNA 8 on resident rights, signed by the aide on 10/27/2023. Additional review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure its staff performed hand sanitation measures and maintained appropriate infection control measures during medication administration for 3 out of 39 sampled residents (R47, R52, R16, R57), which placed residents at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAI). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, dated 09/03/2021 and revised 02/21/2024, revealed all hand hygiene was to be performed in accordance with the facility-established hand hygiene procedures. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines dated May 2022 for medication administration the general guidelines noted the person administering medication was to adhere to good hand hygiene, to include washing hands thoroughly. Observation on 08/08/2024 at 9:30 AM, revealed two hand sanitizer dispensers located at each end of the resident hallways available for staffs' use. Observation on 08/08/2024 at 10:12 AM, of medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of facility Policy, it was determined the facility failed to prepare and store food under sanitary conditions. Observation on 10/29/19, during initial kitchen tour, revealed two (2) beverage pitchers were not labeled or dated, the ingredient bins had dry dusty food particles on the outside and the kitchen had a general dusty appearance. In addition, observation revealed the Manager in Training was not using correct procedure to to measure the sanitizer in the pot and pan sink. Continued observation of the kitchen on 10/29/19, revealed two (2) holes in the back wall over the back prep table. In addition, the floors to the base boards appeared soiled; window sills were dusty; walls throughout the kitchen needed paint, and paint was peeling off the wall near the hand sink. Further, the exhaust hood fire extinguisher pipes were dusty; the pot and pan rack over the prep table was dusty; the ceiling vents were dusty; and the top shelf of the prep table was dusty and had a greasy feel. Additionally, interviews with Dietary Staff on 10/31/19,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's needs for four (4) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents (Residents #9, #33, #42, #56). Resident #9's Monthly October 2019 Physician's Orders, revealed current orders for left hand splint as needed dated 11/28/16; and gentle stretch and wear left resting hand splint at night, dated 02/10/17. However, there was no documented evidence the facility developed the CCP to include interventions related to the left resting hand splint. Additionally, the resident was discharged from Physical Therapy (PT) on 10/17/19, with recommendations to transition to the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) in order to maintain current level of function with bed mobility, and bilateral lower extremity (BLE) Active Range of Motion (AROM). However, there was no documented evidence the facility developed or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-12-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY