The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium Place
1010 East 33rd Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 · For profit - Corporation · 49 certified beds · (410) 554-9890 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.1% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 76.8% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.2% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.0% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 13.8% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.6% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.8% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.37 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 204 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.0%CMS range 52.4–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 9.9–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.0–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 50.5 residents a day — about 103% occupied, or roughly -2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address and implement interventions for a resident admitted with a suprapubic catheter. This was identified during the review of 1 of 1 residents with suprapubic catheters. The findings include: On 1/4/23 Surveyor met with Resident #20 during the initial tour. During this initial meeting and interview, Resident #20 reported that s/he was in discomfort and believed that they had a urinary tract infection (UTI) as there was some pressure and discomfort in their abdomen and they could tell that the catheter was probably clogged as s/he could feel it was leaking. Surveyor asked if this was reported to the staff, and s/he stated that staff were aware. Medical record review of Resident #20 starting on 1/09/23 at 9:56 AM revealed admitting diagnoses' including multiple sclerosis (the immune system attacks the protective sheath (myelin) that covers nerve fibers and causes communication problems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan after the resident had a change in condition. This was evident in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Surveyor review of complaint (2723293) alleging facility nursing staff failed to provide adequate colostomy care to Resident #3.Review of Resident #3's medical records on 2/24/26 at 12:45pm revealed the resident had orders for the care and maintenance of the resident's colostomy bag and the stoma. A progress note dated 2/18/26 revealed that the resident frequently manipulated his/her colostomy bag and removed the colostomy bag requiring facility nursing staff to change the bag frequently. The frequent manipulation of the colostomy bag and stoma also caused irritation at the colostomy site. Review of Resident #3's care plan revealed no evidence that the resident's behavior of manipulating the colostomy site were listed nor where there any interventions listed to prevent the behavior. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff coverage as required and failed to ensure that call bells were answered in a timely manner. This deficient practice was evident for all four nursing units during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 10/16/25 at 8:07AM, during the initial observation of the second-floor unit (unit two of four total floors and units), the surveyor asked Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #1 a question. The GNA responded to the question and then continued assisting residents on unit 2. The surveyor then proceeded to the third-floor unit. At 8:33AM, during the observation of the third floor, the surveyor observed GNA #1 assisting residents. When asked which unit she is assigned to, the GNA stated that the facility was short-staffed, and she was covering multiple floors.A review of the facility's staffing sheet for 10/16/25, for day shift for all four units indicated that the facility had one Registered Nurse (RN), one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and three GNA's on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility's assessment accurately reflected the facility's staffing requirements. This deficient practice was evident during the complaint survey.The findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/16/25 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment with her. The DON stated that she participates in the facility assessment process. When asked if the assessment was up to date, she stated that she believed it was. The surveyor informed her that the date on the facility assessment was August 2024.The surveyor and the DON discussed the staffing requirements outlined in the facility assessment which indicated the following: one nurse and Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) to each unit (4 units) on the day shift; one nurse covering two units and one GNA assigned on the evening shift; and one nurse with three GNA's splitting coverage across the units on the night shift. The DON stated the information on the facility assessment was incorrect. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaint #2611976, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's clinical record was accurately documented regarding the date and acquisition of pressure injuries. This was evident for 1 out of 2 complaints reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Section M of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a part of the Resident Assessment Instrument used in long-term care facilities to document the risk, presence, appearance, and changes of skin conditions, primarily pressure ulcers. It also tracks other skin ulcers, wounds, lesions, and related treatments to ensure a comprehensive approach to skin care, prevention, and treatment. On 10/16/2025 at 9:50 AM, review of complaint #2611976 showed that on 09/09/2025, the resident's family filed a complaint with the State Agency stating concerns regarding Resident #301's wounds and care while the resident was at the facility.On 10/16/2025 at 10:12 AM, review of Section M of the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to perform bed rail assessments and obtain resident consent for bedrails. This was evident for 4 (Resident #17, # 21, #68, and #64) out of 5 residents reviewed for bedrails during the survey. The findings include: Bedrails, also known as side rails, are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them, such as suffocation, entrapment, and psychological risks. A Resident or Resident's Representative should be provided with the risks and benefits along with a signed consent obtained before the use of bedrails. 1. On 07/14/2025 at 08:35 AM the surveyor observed Resident # 64 was in bed with bilateral bed rails and the bed was in the high Fowler position. On 07/15/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures and failed to store and prepare food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice was evident for 2 of 4 kitchens that prepare food for residents within the facility. The findings include:During a tour of the facility's 2nd floor kitchen conducted on 7/15/2025 at 8:00AM, the Surveyor observed [NAME] #28, Dietary Aide #29, and Dietary Aide #30 standing in the kitchen without hairnets while breakfast was being prepared. [NAME] #28 stated that they ran out of hairnets and the Dietary Manager #25 ordered some and they should be in today. The Surveyor observed a personal black handbag on the counter between the portable steam tray and sink, and a fabric covered book and two 16.9oz bottles of Pepsi sitting on the silver island in the food prep area. The black handbag was moved into a tall brown cabinet with a sticky-like substance on the handles. Inside the cabinet, the Surveyor observed one open 25lb white bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to timely respond to the needs of a resident (Resident #21) reviewed for accommodation of needs during the survey.The findings include: On 07/15/2025 at 9:25AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #21. The resident stated that he/she had to wait for 2 hours to get cleaned up over the weekend. The resident stated that he/she would not use the call bell because the staff does not respond and they do not carry the pagers they are supposed to carry to alert them to the resident's call. Instead, the resident has to yell out into the hallway for assistance. The resident pressed the call bell at that time.On 7/15/2025 at 9:45AM, the Surveyor walked into the hallway and observed staff passing out breakfast trays and preparing PPE carts. The Surveyor did not hear any beeping sounds. The Surveyor stopped Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #24 in the hallway. The Surveyor asked the GNA how she would know when a resident needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with the residents, family and facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an environment that promotes dignity and respect for residents who require assistance with their daily care. This was found to be evident for 1(Resident #49) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse allegations during the survey.The findings include:Intake #331013 was reviewed on 7/21/25 at 11:00AM for allegations of resident abuse to Resident # 49. The abuse allegations were unsubstantiated.Resident #49 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited diagnosis: Osteoarthritis (Degenerative Joint Disease) Right Hip and Muscle Weakness.An interview was conducted with Resident #49 on 7/22/25 at 10:59AM and the resident was asked about the care that s/he received while at the facility. The resident went on to say that a few months ago while in the facility a nurse (Staff #21) did not provide assistance when requested. The resident stated that the nurse questioned why s/he did not ask the aide for assistance. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident and /or the resident representative (RP) received notice in a timely manner regarding notification and explanation of their rights pending discharge from Medicare. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 67) of 4 residents reviewed regarding liability notices during the survey.The findings include:Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) is notification to residents and/or their representative (RP) regarding the end of their Medicare coverage. Notification is required to be minimally 48 hours prior to the scheduled effective date that coverage will end, therefore, affording the resident an opportunity to appeal the decision or to prepare for discharge.During a medical record review on [DATE] at approximately 11:30AM for Resident # 67 for discharge, the facility provided the survey team with the non-medical coverage documentation. The form indicated that the resident services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation related to an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 2 of 6 facility reports reviewed during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1.) On 07/18/2025 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor requested information related to an abuse allegation reported by the facility to the State Agency on 2/23/23. The Director of Nursing stated that the facility had no records related to the report. On 07/21/2025, the surveyor requested additional information from the State Agency. The initial report and 5-day report were reviewed and indicated that the investigation had been completed in a satisfactory manner, and reporting appeared to have occurred within the required 2-hour timeframe. However, exact incident times were not documented, and the facility failed to retain required records of the incident investigation or reporting process. 2.) On 07/17/25 at 1:10 PM the surveyor reviewed the change in condition report dated 01/03/2023 which was located in the electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current code status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #68) out of 2 residents reviewed for care planning during the survey.The findings include:A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care while in the facility.Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) is an order placed in a person's medical record by a doctor informs the medical staff that CPR should not be attempted.Do Not Intubate (DNI) is an order placed in a person's medical record by a doctor informs the medical staff that chest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for tube feeding was accurately followed (Resident #12) who was reviewed for tube feeding. The findings include:On 7/15/2025 at 8:53AM, during an interview with Resident #12, the Surveyor observed the resident's tube feeding running at 75ml/hour and the flush bag was not labeled.On 7/15/2025 at 10:30AM, a review of Resident #12's electronic medical record revealed an active physician's order for Jevity 1.5kcal Up : 5 pm Down : 3 am TV : 75 mL/hr x 10 hrs.During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 7/21/2025 at 12:45PM, the Surveyor was informed that Resident #12's order for the tube feed to be started at 5PM and ended at 3AM. The tube feed should be labeled with the resident name, room number, name of the formula, formula rate, the date and time hung, and nurse initials. The flush bag should also be labeled with the resident name, flush rate, date and time hung, and the nurse initials. The Surveyor expressed the concern that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of medical records, interviews with residents, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that facility staff failed to document administration of as needed (PRN) pain medications in a resident's medication administration record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of two residents reviewed for pain management during the survey.The findings include:Resident #66 was diagnosed with displaced closed fracture of the left tibia and admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 07/16/2025 at 11:24 AM Resident #66 stated that right leg pain occurs regularly and there had been a delay in the staff responding to the call bell which meant the resident was in pain for longer periods of time. The resident's spouse stated that he/she spoke to nursing staff regarding the delay in the delivery of pain medication and some improvements occurred, but the delays in the staff's response to the call bells still occur routinely. Resident # 66's spouse explained that the staff response to the call bell would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of medical records, interviews with residents, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for pain management and 1 of out of 4 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for accidents during the survey. The findings include: 1. Resident #66 was diagnosed with displaced closed fracture of the left tibia and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:24 AM Resident #66 stated that right leg pain occurs regularly and there has been a delay in the staff responding to the call bell which means the resident is in pain for longer periods of time. The resident's spouse stated that he/she spoke to nursing staff regarding the delay in the delivery of pain medication and some improvements occurred, but the delays in the staff’s response to the call bells still occur routinely. On [DATE] at 9:10 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment for enhanced barrier precautions and failed to ensure a resident's order for enhanced barrier precautions was maintained and followed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #21 and #32) out of 14 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions during the survey.The findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns during high-contact resident care to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). EBP's are used in nursing homes for residents who are infected with an MDRO, or those at risk for acquiring one, such as residents with wounds or indwelling devices.Personal protective equipment (PPE) refers to protective items or garments worn to protect the body or clothing from hazards that can cause injury and to protect residents from cross-transmission. PPE can include gloves, masks, safety goggles, and gowns. 1. On 7/16/2025 at 1:40PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviewed it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident, and/or their responsible party, received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and ombudsman contact information (Residents #19, #201 and #202). This was found to be evident for 3 out of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #201's medical record on 1/6/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident was transferred from the facility on 12/13/22 to the hospital. Further review of the Resident's medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a written notice regarding the transfer had been provided to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/10/23 at 2:00 PM confirmed neither Resident #201 nor their responsible party had been sent a letter that notified them of the transfer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1. appropriately code a residents suprapubic catheter on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident during the review of 1 of 1 residents identified as having suprapubic catheters (Resident #20). 2. accurately code significant weight loss (Resident #7), 3. accurately code the use of oxygen (Resident #35) and 4. accurately code the use of antibiotics (Resident #28). This was evident for 4 out of 50 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: 1. Interview with Resident #20 on 1/4/23 at 9:39 AM revealed s/he has a suprapubic catheter (A suprapubic catheter (tube) drains urine from your bladder. It is inserted into your bladder through a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0642 — patternEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff completed MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments without the proper qualifications (Residents #7, #17, #31, #37, #53, #201, #202). This was evident for 7 of 50 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gathers information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. MDS Section V Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary contains B. Signature of RN (Registered Nurse) Coordinator for CAA Process. MDS Section Z Assessment Administration contains Z0500 Signature of RN Assessment Coordinator verifying assessment completion. During interview with the Regional MDS Coordinator on 1/18/23 at 9:30 AM she states she is a LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and not a RN. Review of the following Residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a resident's interdisciplinary care plan (Residents #29, #37, #201). This was evident for 3 of 50 residents reviewed during an annual survey. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a vision care plan for Resident #37. During interview of Resident #37 on 1/3/23 at 11:37 AM, Resident #37 stated he/she needs glasses. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 1/11/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Glaucoma. Glaucoma is a disease that damages your eye's optic nerve. Further review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the facility staff completed a MDS (Minimum Data Set) admission Assessment on 4/6/22. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and resident interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure care plan meetings were held. This was evident for 4 (#28, #29, #37, #202) out of 50 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: 1. The facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were held for a resident and failed to invite the resident. Resident #28 was interviewed on 1/3/23 at 10:28 AM. The resident stated that he/she has never been to a care plan meeting. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that the last care plan meeting in the clinical record was for 1/27/21 and there was an absence of sign in sheets. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/18/23 at 10:40 AM revealed that evidence of care plans was not present in the clinical record. 2. During interview with Resident #37 on 1/3/23 at 11:35 AM, he/she stated doesn't have care plan meetings quarterly. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 1/6/23 revealed the Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #7, #46 and #201). This is evident for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during an annual survey. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique form of pressure ulcer. The National Pressure Ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident (Resident #201, #29) and failed to ensure a resident room was safe (Resident #151). This was evident for 3 out of 50 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #201's medical record on 1/6/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of repeated falls. The facility staff completed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) for the Resident on 8/19/22 and coded the Resident as a 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #201's medical record revealed the Resident had a fall forward from his/her wheelchair on 6/14/22. The Resident was evaluated by Physical Therapy on 6/17/22 for use of the wheelchair. Review of the Physical Therapy assessment on 6/17/22 included, patient demonstrated poor trunk control, cognitive and sitting balance impairment resulting in higher…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to failed to obtain weights on Resident #37 as recommended by the dietitian and facility staff failed to thoroughly monitor and add interventions timely when the facility staff documented a significant weight loss for a resident Resident #7. This was evident for 2 of 5 residents selected for review for nutrition during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain weights for Resident #37 as recommended by the dietitian. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 1/6/23 revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include malnutrition. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed a Nutrition/Dietary note on 5/5/22 that included, weekly weights times 4 weeks ordered. Review of Resident #37's weights revealed a weight on 5/5, 5/13 and 5/19/22. There was no weekly weight on 5/26/22. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and consultation for (#3), 6 months out of 12 possible months in 2022. This was evident in 1 out of 50 residents sampled as part of this survey. The findings are: Resident #3 was interviewed on 01/03/2023 at 10:48 am. Resident #3 stated the facility did not address his/her mood behavior consistently on a monthly basis. Review of Resident #3 medical record revealed that on 01/10/2022, 5/05/2022, 7/17/2022, 8/21/2022, 9/15/2022, and 12/03/2022 a Psychiatric evaluation and consultation for the resident was completed. The records include documentation that assessments of Resident #3 were done on these dates. Further review of Resident #3 clinical record revealed that a mental health consult did not occur for 6 months. There was no documentation of a consult for February, March, April, June, October, and November to address his/her depression.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the tour of the four kitchens, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure food is stored and prepared in a properly maintained kitchen. This was evident for 4 out of the 4 kitchens. The findings include: A tour of the 2nd floor kitchen on 1/12/23 at 11:25 AM revealed that several of the cabinets had broken cabinet drawer faces. Observation of the 4th floor kitchen on 1/12/23 at 11:40 AM revealed that some of the cabinets had broken drawer faces, the freezer had six bags of unidentified food sitting in a box that was unlabeled and stuck to the bottom of the freezer, both ovens were dirty on the inside, and the electric stove top was cracked with a piece missing on the edge closest to the user. Observation of the 3rd floor kitchen on 1/12/23 at 12:15 PM revealed both ovens were dirty on the inside, the freezer had a box of 12 croissants in it with a hole in the shrink wrap along the upper right quadrant (roughly the size of a croissant). Staff #13 was interviewed on 1/12/13 at 11:30 AM. He said he was aware of the condition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0840 — patternEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. failed to follow the recommendations of a consultant (Resident #40) 2. ensure timely consult reports from the use of outside resources (Resident #17) 3. failed to ensure urology consults were obtained and recommendations followed (Resident #20), 4. failed to follow up and implement interventions for a resident with an identified impaired nutritional status (Resident #7). This was evident for 4 out of 12 residents with outside consults during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Resident #40 was reviewed for general skin condition beginning on 01/03/2023 at 09:46 AM. During initial tour, this resident was concerned for a sore toe on their right foot that they did not feel was being checked on. The resident was admitted to the LTC facility on 12/09/2022. Hospital discharge record dated 12/09/2022 at 3:57 PM was reviewed for this resident. Surveyor's review of this record occurred on 01/05/2023 at 01:31 PM. The resident had a prominent ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record in the most complete and accurate form for Residents (#17, #19, #24, #54 and #201). This was evident for 5 of 50 residents selected for medical record review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A medical record is simply a record of a resident's health and medical history. Consistent, current, and complete documentation in the medical record is an essential component of quality resident care. 1. The facility staff failed to document the administration of medications for Resident #54. A medical record review for Resident #54 revealed the physician ordered: 1. On 11/17/2021 Dilaudid Tablet 2 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain take 1 for mild pain 1 - 5. 2. On 11/17/2021 Dilaudid Tablet 2 MG Give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain 5- 10. Dilaudid is a narcotic pain medication. Narcotic pain medications are potent and effective at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a revisit of previous annual surveys and deficient practices identified during this survey, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance Program as evidenced by the identification of 7 repeat deficiencies. The failure to identify and develop appropriate plans of correction to correct quality deficiencies places all residents at risk. The findings include: The repeat deficiencies reviewed included areas of 1. In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must: maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. 2. must store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 3.the facility staff must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. 4. The services provided or arranged by the facility staff must meet professional standards of quality. 5. The facility must ensure that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of the residents and facility, and a review of the facility pest control records, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program, specifically concerning fly control (Resident #7), 2nd 3rd, and 4th floors of the facility. The findings included: On 3/17/23 at 8:30 AM, Resident #7 was eating breakfast and 2 flies were flying around the food. Resident #7 was swatting the flies away with his/her hand while eating breakfast on the fourth floor. On 3/17/ 23 at 10:20 am, a tour of the facility's 2nd floor revealed flies in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Flies were noted in the long hallway on the second floor and in the kitchen area. A tour of the 3rd floor at 1:30 pm revealed that under the hand sink in the kitchen were approximately 30 dead flies in the cabinet. The Surveyors opened the pantry door and 2 flies were noted flying out. A tour of the 4th floor at 9 am revealed flies in the kitchen and conference room. The facility's pest control logs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40 had laundered personal clothing available to wear in accordance with this resident's wishes in order to maintain the resident's dignity. On 01/05/2023 at 08:00 AM, Resident #40 was observed dressed in a hospital gown in the hallway, verbalizing that they had no clothes to wear. Staff #26: GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) #4, was seen in the hall by the laundry room and acknowledged the resident's clothes were in the laundry and not ready. On 01/05/2023 at 09:35 AM, the resident was observed by surveyors sitting in a chair in the community area dressed in the hospital gown and pants verbalizing that his/her own clothes were preferred but were not laundered yet. On 01/10/2023 at 08:30 AM, Resident #40 was observed sitting in a chair in the community area with an upset facial expression. At this time, the resident was interviewed by surveyors. The resident reported during the interview that they did not want to wear a hospital gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on an initial observation prior to and of dining the facility failed to provide the residents with and environment that included comfortable sound levels with appropriate entertainment. This was evident during the first observation of dining occurring on the 4th floor. The findings include: Surveyor initiated observations of the community sitting area on 1/3/23 at 12:30 PM There were 4 residents observed gathered around the television, Resident #2, #17, #24 and #29. Surveyor was located near the exit of the unit and could hear from the kitchen music blaring. The lyrics were audible and identified as belonging to two prominent rappers. The music was overpowering the sound from the television. When the staff began serving the lunch meal trays to the residents at 12:42 PM they turned the music off. This concern was reviewed with the facility Administrator and DON during the exit conference on 1/23/2023.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident and their representative with written notice of bed hold policy, at the time of the resident's transfer for hospitalization. This was evident for 2 (Residents #19 and #48) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 10/9/2022. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. On 1/19/23 at 11:06 AM, the Administrator confirmed that Resident #48 and the Resident's responsible party did not receive the facility bed hold policy when Resident #48 was transferred to the hospital. 2. The resident and family were not notified of the facility bed hold policy at the time of the resident transfer to the hospital. A review of Resident #19's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the standard of practice during medication administration for the care of the resident (Resident # 55). This was evident for 1 of 50 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: One of the recommendations to reduce medication errors and harm is to use the five rights. The Five Rights of Medication Administration are the right patient, the right drug, the right dose, the right route, and the right time. The facility uses an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for the administration and documentation of medications for administration to the residents. The physician's orders for the medications are entered in the EMR with the times of medication administration. Medications must be given within 1/2 hour of the time that is listed on the medication log. This means that you have 1/2 hour before the medication is due, and 1/2 hour after it is due to administering the medication to be on time with medication administration. A medical record review for Resident # 55 revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide grooming and personal hygiene services for a resident (Resident #204). This was evident for 1 out of 50 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Observation of Resident #204 on 1/4/23 at 9:42 AM revealed the Resident to have elongated and dirty fingernails. Interview with the Resident at that time revealed the Resident would like to have his/her fingernails trimmed. Further observation of the Resident on 1/20/23 at 8:10 AM with the Administrator present revealed the Resident remains with elongated and dirty fingernails. Review of Resident #204's medical record on 1/5/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] is dependent on the facility staff for his care, comfort and safety. The facility staff conducted a MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment on 12/31/22 and coded the Resident in Section G Functional Status as a one person physical assist for personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's bed had a complete pair of siderails. This was evident for 1 out of the 50 residents selected for the survey sample. The findings include: This surveyor was interviewing Resident #19 on 1/12/23 at 9:30 AM. During the interview it was observed that both of the resident's bed's siderails were missing the top wooden rail. Resident said it has been off since admission and they are stored in the bathroom. Resident stated that he/she uses the rails to move in bed especially when transferring to the wheelchair. Resident stated he/she can still maneuver in bed without the rails. The Administrator was informed and shown the bed on 1/12/23 at 9:40 AM. He called for maintenance staff to come fix the bed and had a geriatric nursing assistant come into the room to assist the resident to a wheelchair.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the physician progress notes did not contain or address pertinent issues that were relevant at the time the notes were completed. This was evident during the review of 1 of 26 resident physician notes. (#7) The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 on 1/5/2023 at 10:18 AM revealed diagnosis including adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial and may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments), abnormal weight loss and the presence of multiple wounds. Further review of Resident #7 specifically focusing on his/her weights noted that according to the facility electronic health record (EHR) under weights and vitals noted the following weights: 12/7/22: 93, 12/14: 80.2, 12/28:81.2, 1/4/23:80.0, a 13 lb weight loss identified on 12/14 that was maintained through 1/4/23. The attending medical notes for Resident #7 were reviewed following the noted significant weight loss. The attending note completed by staff #22 on 1/6/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the review of employee files and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have competency skills list provided and available for Geriatric Nursing Assistance (GNA) upon hire. This was evident for 2 of 4 GNA employee files reviewed. The findings include: Review of the employee files for staff GNA #18 and #19 who were hired within the past 2 years failed to reveal a skills checklist with appropriate GNA competencies reviewed upon hire. There were two other GNA files reviewed however, they have been employed at the facility prior to the last survey and had their annual competencies completed up through the current administration. Employee files were reviewed, and missing information was requested from the DON on 1/23/23. The DON followed up with the survey team on 1/23/23 at 11:39 AM and stated that she was unable to locate any skills checklist for the identified GNA's.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were destroyed after a resident expired or the medications were discontinued; and secure a medication storage room and properly label resident medication. This was found to be evident during observation of two of four medication storage rooms. The findings include: 1. During observations of Residents [DATE] at 1:16 PM, surveyor observed at the external nursing desk on the 4th floor in the overhead cabinets multiple bags of intravenous fluid and other nursing care supplies. Closer look in the unsecured cabinets and drawers found the following items: First identified for Resident #152, who passed away in the facility 10/2022, are items with his/her name specifically on it dressing change set 8 bags of 2-liter sodium chloride intravenous fluid (IVF) Vancomycin-antibiotic intravenous (2) 16 saline chloride syringes dated as delivered on [DATE] with a primary tubing set up, needless connector and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was reviewed monthly (#19). This was true for 1 out of 50 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: A review of Resident #19's clinical record on 1/9/23 and 1/10/23 revealed that the resident's primary physician prescribed Olanzapine 2.5 mg (antipsychotic), tamsulosin 0.4 mg (treats renal conditions), apixaban 2.5 mg (an anticoagulant), mirtazapine (an antidepressant), multi-vitamin tablet, Senna-Docusate 8.6-50 mg tablet (bowel regimen), Sennosides (bowel regimen), and Metoprolol 12.5 mg (hypertension). A pharmacy review for October 2022 was not in the clinical record. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 1/11/23 at 11:14 AM. She stated that the resident was not seen by pharmacy in October 2022.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on random observations it was determined that the facility failed on multiple occasions to ensure that the code cart and the medication carts were secure. This was observed on different occasions and locations. The findings include: 1. During initial tour and observations, the facility code cart was observed without a red security tag sealing the cart closed on 1/3/23 at 09:13 AM. Surveyor was able to pull open all the drawers and observe needed code supplies including scissors, paramedic shears, 9 hypodermic needles and razors. Staff observed the surveyors at the code cart. On 1/3/23 at 12:34 PM surveyor observed a white plastic bag covering the code cart and a red tab interlocking the drawers for security. Additionally at this time 4 residents were observed sitting in the common area watching television. On 1/6/23 at 12:00 PM Surveyor took a closer look at the code cart and the red tag. Surveyor was able to still open all the drawers. The surveyor notified the DON on 1/6/23 at 12:37 of the observations when she arrived on the 4th floor. The DON stated that the cart was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was screened for dental services (#28). This was evident for 1 out of 50 residents reviewed as part of the survey sample. The findings include: Resident #28 was interviewed on 1/3/23 at 10:30 AM. Resident stated that he/she has not been seen by a dentist since admission. Resident was noted to have debris between the teeth. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that there has not been a dental consult within the last 12 months. Resident was interviewed on 1/18/23 at 1:35 PM. Resident stated that he/she would like to see a dentist and to have implants for both the upper and lower. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the findings at the exit conference on 1/23/23.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines by failing to maintain a sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease-causing organisms from exposed foam and underneath padding due to torn and cracked vinyl on stools. The findings: The observation was made, on 3/17/2023 at 10:20 AM in the 2nd-floor kitchen area: One stool at the counter with vinyl material was peeling off from 9 o'clock to 2 o'clock with the foam exposed. Another stool had random wear on the top and the sides with the foam exposed. The stools cannot be disinfected and cleaned properly to prevent the spread of microorganisms. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator were advised on 3/21/23 at 2:30 pm.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement an Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) to provide appropriate infection surveillance, an effective antibiotic stewardship program for residents, and review the IPCP annually . This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. Findings include: A record review was conducted on 3/8/2019 at 1:55 PM. Review of the facility's Infection Control Program policy failed to indicate protocols to determine antibiotic use and identified what infection assessment would be used to start antibiotic treatment for residents. Review of the submitted Quality Assurance Committee documentation and interview with the Director of Nursing and the Administration on 3/11/19 at 2:45 PM revealed that the facility did not maintain consistent documentation regarding antibiotic use reviews, monitoring of residents with infections or communicable diseases, or of staff call outs regarding illnesses. In addition there was no documentation submitted to support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-03-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of pertinent documentation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have an active antibiotic stewardship program in place for the past year. This was evident after the attempted review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/11/19 at 2:43 PM revealed the antibiotic stewardship policy was not able to be located for surveyor review at the time of the survey. Interview with the Administrator on 3/11/19 at 3:47 PM revealed the DON is to be responsible for overall compliance. In addition the fact that surveyors were unable to determine when the policy was implemented and last reviewed was discussed with the Administrator at that time.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) provide notice to residents informing them that Medicare may deny payments for procedures or treatments and that residents may be personally responsible for full payment, and 2.) provide notification to residents that their Medicare coverage was ending within the required time frame. This was evident in 3 of 3, residents (Resident #247, #248 and #21) reviewed during beneficiary protection notification. The findings include: Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is a written notice from Medicare, given to residents before receiving certain items or services notifying beneficiaries that Medicare may deny payment for that specific procedure or treatment. An ABN gives residents the opportunity to accept or refuse the items or services and protects residents from unexpected financial liability in cases where Medicare denies payment. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter is intended to notify a Medicare member, in writing, that the member's Medicare health plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and other pertinent documentation as well as staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident safety while an investigation was in process and failed to complete thorough investigations as evidenced by allowing an accused employee to work with residents prior to the completion of the investigation and failure to interview potential witnesses. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 4 residents (Resident #96, #297 and #146) reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/11/19 review of a facility report investigation revealed that on 10/13/17 Resident #96 made an abuse allegation involving Nurse #17 and Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #18. Review of the statement written by Nurse #17 revealed it was written on 10/15/17. Review of the final report sent to the state survey and certification agency, and was dated 10/17/17, revealed: After investigating the complaint that [resident] reported. The investigation is unfounded. On 3/11/19 interview with the Director of Social Services clarified that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a resident on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding antipsychotic and anxiolytic usage. This was evident in the review of 2 of 6 residents (Resident #42 and #31) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. It is designed to collect the minimum amount of data to guide care planning and monitoring for residents in long-term care settings. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. Review of medical record for Resident #42 on 3/7/19 at 9:52 AM revealed documentation on the Quarterly MDS that the resident received antipsychotics on an as needed basis and in addition failed to document that the resident received anxiolytic during the assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/19. The MDS Coordinator was interviewed on 3/7/19 at 11:39 AM and 12:18 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to provide a summary of the Baseline Plan of Care to the resident or responsible party. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for care planning in the investigative section of the survey process. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 3/8/19 Resident #39's medical record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January 2019 for long term care and with diagnoses which included Heart Failure, Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rate). Review of the medical records for the Baseline Care Plan revealed that on admission the facility began to obtain information and assess the resident and from the gathering of information, the facility uses the information to build an interim care plan. That interim care plan or baseline care plan is discussed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive care plans as evidenced by: 1.) failure to update care plan to reflect that restorative services were on hold, 2.) failure to establish a care plan for restorative nursing services, 3.) failure to include safety measures in regard to dining precautions, 4.) failure to develop an individualized care plan related to a residents diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), and 5.) failure to follow the resident care plan by ensuring that regularly scheduled medications were available to administer to the resident. This was found to be evident for 5 of 23 residents (Resident #28, #9, #25, #31, and #23) investigated during the survey. Findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is valuable in preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels. It must reflect immediate steps for assuring outcomes which improve the resident's status and progress. 1.) On 3/6/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure restorative nursing services were provided as ordered. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: On 3/6/19 review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a Restorative Nursing Program had been established for the resident in September 2018. A review of the physician orders revealed the following, 9/21/18: restorative 6x/week starting 9/22/18: PROM (passive range of motion) to bilateral upper extremities. Apply right upper extremity resting hand splint up to 8 hours or to tolerance. Review of current care record, where the geriatric nursing assistants record care, revealed a place for documentation of restorative but only included the splint for 8 hours. No documentation was found on the care record regarding the passive range of motion. Review of the 12/19/18 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident did not receive range of motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received 1:1 supervision during meals as ordered by the physician, and failed to implement the speech therapist recommendation of no straws for a resident with a swallowing dysfunction. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #25) reviewed for potential accidents. The facility also failed to ensure pureed food was of a smooth pudding like consistency. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 pureed test tray obtained during the survey but has the potential to affect any resident receiving a pureed diet. The findings include: 1. On 3/5/19 at 9:10 AM Resident #25 was observed in bed with a breakfast tray with cut up pancake and sausage on the tray. No staff was present in the resident's room at the time of this observation. After the initial observation of the resident Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #5) was briefly interviewed in the hall. The GNA #5 reported that she checks on the resident every few minutes and that the nurse assigned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with the resident and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to have enough staff to: 1.) ensure that a resident's regularly scheduled medication was available as ordered as to prevent missing doses at the time of administration, and 2.) provide physician ordered meal supervision. This was found to be evident for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #23 and #25) reviewed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: 1. Complaint # MD00135007 was reviewed on 3/6/19 and 3/7/19. According to the complainant, nursing staff did not administer regularly scheduled medications to Resident #23 because the medications were not available. Review of the medical record on 3/7/19 revealed Resident #23 was admitted with the following but not limited diagnoses; Quadriplegia, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Orthostatic Hypotension (low blood pressure), Major Depressive Disorder, Fibromyalgia (pain). An interview was conducted with Resident #23 on 3/5/19 at 8:46 AM and s/he stated the following: that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure both nurses and geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) demonstrated skills competency prior to working independently with residents. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 recently hired GNA's (GNA #10 and #11) and 2 out of 2 recently hired nurses (Nurse #12 and #13). The findings include: On 3/8/19 at 8:10 AM the Administrator reported that newly hired GNA's and nurses work with a partner during a 5 day period in which a skills checklist is completed. She went on to report that staff should be giving this checklist back to her to put in the employee file. 1. On 3/8/19 review of GNA #10's employee file revealed a hire date of 2/18/19 but failed to reveal documentation of a skills checklist. Review of GNA #11's employee file revealed a hire date of 1/7/19 but failed to reveal documentation of a skills check list. During an interview, at 12:35 PM, regarding no documentation of skills checklist the Administrator reported: I had to ask [the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of employee files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) were currently certified. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 4 GNA's (GNA #20) files reviewed for GNA's that had worked at the facility for more than one year. The findings include: Of Note: this facility was cited for this issue during the annual survey in 2015. On [DATE] review of a list of nurses and GNA's revealed GNA #20 had been hired in [DATE]. Review of GNA #20's employee file failed to reveal documentation of an annual evaluation. On [DATE] at 10:55 AM when asked about this, the Administrator reported that this GNA had gone to work for housekeeping in August of 2017 and she was not sure of the date the employee had returned to working as a GNA. On [DATE] at 2:12 PM review of state board of nursing website revealed GNA #20's GNA certification expired on [DATE] and had not been renewed. Interview with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the staff failed to have a system in place to ensure that the pharmacist recommendations were reviewed/addressed by the physicians in a timely manner and failed to ensure that a prn (as needed) order for an anti-psychotic medication was limited to 14 days and then obtain a new order for the medication only after evaluation from the physician. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the investigative stage of the survey process. The findings include: On 3/11/19 Resident #12's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the pharmacist had completed the monthly medication reviews and made a written recommendation to the physician on 1/10/19. This pharmacy review revealed the following: Recommended discontinuation/re-evaluation of the following Olanzapine 2.5 mg every 24 hours as needed. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that this recommendation had been addressed by the physician. PRN (as needed) orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer medication according to physician orders. This was evident during the review of 1 of 6 unnecessary medications (Resident #21). The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 on 3/8/19 at 1:38 PM revealed diagnoses including chronic viral hepatitis and polyneuropathy due to toxic agents. Further review revealed an order for Tylenol 2 tablets as needed every 12 hours for temperature over 100 degrees. In addition, an order to administer 2 tablets of Tylenol every 12 hours as needed for mild pain 1-5. A review of the January 2019 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation that the Tylenol was administered on 1/7/19, 1/10/19 and 1/11/19 for a temperature of 97.2, 97 and 97.2 respectively. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and made aware of the documentation on the MAR and lack of corresponding nursing notes for those days on 3/8/19 at 1:38 PM. She stated that the employee that documented the administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a PRN (as needed) order for an anti-psychotic medication was limited to 14 days and then obtain a new order for the medication only after evaluation from the physician. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: PRN (as needed) orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. On 3/11/19 a review of Resident #12's medical records revealed diagnoses which included dementia and altered mental status. Review of the current medication orders revealed the following in effect since January 3, 2019: Olanzapine 2.5 milligram (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for agitation QHS (at night) only. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January thru March 2019 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review and observation of medical records, Controlled Drug Count Verification sheets, observation of the medication room refrigerators, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the temperature on the medication refrigerator was documented daily. This was found to be evident for 3 out of the 3 nursing medication room refrigerators. The findings include: Review and observation of the refrigerator logs of Unit 2, 3 and 4 medication rooms on 3/11/19 between 3-3:30 PM revealed 'daily refrigerator temperature logs' with missing daily temperatures for the month of March 2019. Further review of the temperature logs for January and February of 2019 for all 3 units revealed sporadic documentation that the temperature was checked. The documentation on the 3rd floor 'Daily refrigerator temperature log' documented that for March 2019 the temperatures ranged from 46-50 degrees and with no subsequent interventions. According to the log, the refrigerator temperature is to be maintain between 35-41 degrees Fahrenheit. This concern was reviewed with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the flu vaccine annually. This was found to be evident for one out of five residents (Resident #3) reviewed for immunizations during survey. The findings include: Review on 3/11/19 at 10:29 AM of the selected residents flu vaccines for 2018 revealed that Resident #3 was not offered the flu vaccine for 2018. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/11/19 at 10:49 AM revealed that the although the previous DON was responsible for tracking the immunizations she would look into the concern and look for the vaccine logs. On 3/11/19 at 11:55 AM according to the paper work provided by the DON, Resident #3 was offered the flu vaccine in 2017 however, the facility had no documentation that the flu vaccine was offered in 2018. According to the facility 'Resident Immunization Policy,' 2. All elder should receive annual influenza immunization unless contraindicated. This concern was reviewed with the DON at that time and again at 2:30 PM on 3/11/19.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRNBAUM, ISRAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 24% | since 07/07/2021 |
| HALPERN, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 07/01/2015 |
| NETZER, LAURIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 07/07/2021 |
| SCHEINER, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 07/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215356. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.