No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation Center

688 Kingsborough Square, Chesapeake, VA 23320 · For profit - Individual · 180 certified beds · (757) 547-9111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (757) 547-9111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
3 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$24,577 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,577 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
112 Gainsborough Sq Ste 100 · (757) 410-2287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
701-A Battlefield Blvd N · (757) 436-0258 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.2 mi
109 Gainsborough Sq · (757) 382-7799 · Call to confirm hours
Park
624 Oak Grove Rd · (757) 382-6411 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
255 Great Bridge Blvd · (757) 382-9500

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.2%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms42.8%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.6%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.0%14.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.2%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.1%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.091.481.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 648 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 261 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.1%CMS range 60.2–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.8–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 5.3–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
63.3%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 175.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2021-12-14)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2019-06-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a family interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of documents provided by the family, the facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #2 received total assistance of two or more people during care/bed mobility and the needed assistive device (a 47-inch wide bariatric bed) was in use to prevent a fall on [DATE] which resulted in multiple blunt force injuries which contributed to the resident's death resulting in immediate jeopardy. The findings included: Resident # 2 was no longer a resident of the facility; therefore, a closed record review was conducted. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included atherosclerosis, hypertensive cardiovascular disease, dementia, CHF, COPD, Diabetes type 2, strokes with right hemiparesis, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, and severe obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interviews, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received two person assistance during care and bed mobility per care plan and the bed mobility assessment binder to prevent accidents for one (1) of six (6) residents in the survey sample, Resident #1 which resulted in a fall with major injuries. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident died in the facility on [DATE]. The diagnoses included metastatic cancer, heart failure, renal insufficiency and malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 8 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. A review of the Resident's care plan revealed an intervention dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.The facility staff failed to ensure the necessary treatment, care and services were provided to prevent development of a pressure ulcer that was initially identified at an advanced stage, resulting in harm. Resident #90 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has been discharged multiple times from the facility to the community. The admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/04/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #90 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionG(Physical functioning) of the admission MDS, the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Requires one person assist with locomotion on and off the unit and with eating. Requiring total dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility's documentation, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services to 1 of 58 residents (Resident #170) for the prevention and complication of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and sepsis. The facility staff failed to notify the physician or Physician Assistant (PA) when orders were given for a UA with C&S, and that they were never obtained, over five days. The resident became unresponsive, with oxygen saturation levels of 83% (normal=95-100%), and was transferred via 911 (emergent) to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of severe sepsis, hypothermia at 88 degrees, complicated UTI and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI); which constitutes harm. The findings included: Resident #170 was originally admitted the nursing facility on 12/13/17. The resident was discharged to the local hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the nursing facility. Diagnoses for Resident #170 included but not limited to Hematuria (blood in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 residents (Residents #99 & Resident #122) of 63 residents in the survey sample received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to identify a pressure ulcer prior to an advanced stage constituting harm for Resident #99; and inaccurately assessed and documented a pressure ulcer to the shin for Resident #122. 1. The facility staff failed to identify Resident #99's left heel pressure ulcer prior to it being found at an advanced stage resulting in harm. The pressure ulcer was first identified found as an unstageable with 100% eschar (hard black dead tissue). 2. For Resident #122, the facility staff failed to accurately assess and document an area of cellulitis at a surgical incision wound on the right shin. The facility staff inaccurately assessed and documented the area as a stage 3 pressure ulcer. The findings included: 1. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident/staff and RP (responsible party) interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for seven of 70 residents, Residents #17, #195, #66, #145, #190, #88 and #134.The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) specifically bathing, incontinence care, dressing, oral hygiene and personal hygiene for a dependent resident, Resident #17 (R17). R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to DM (diabetes mellitus), CKD (chronic kidney disease) and bipolar disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/30/26, coded the resident as scoring a 03 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity by not providing appropriate grooming or clothing before a scheduled outside appointment for 1 of 70 residents (Resident #88), in the survey sample.The findings included: Resident #88 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, anemia, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/16/26 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #88's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired.A synopsis of an event dated 4/22/26 revealed that Resident #88 had a scheduled morning outside appointment and was transported via stretcher by a transport provider. Resident #88 was not appropriately groomed or dressed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of 70 residents in the survey sample, Residents #136. The findings include:For Resident #136 (R136), the facility staff failed to keep the catheter collection bag (1) off the floor. R136 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to obstructive uropathy (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/27/2026, R136 scored 3 (three) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R136 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section H Bladder and Bowel code R136 as having an indwelling catheter. On 05/17/2026 at approximately 1:00 p.m. an observation of R136's catheter collection bag revealed the bottom of the bag was resting on the floor. On 05/17/2026 at approximately 3:30 p.m. an observation of R136's catheter collection bag revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a family interview, staff interviews, a clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure the Power-of-attorney (POA) and/or a designated representative was notified of the identification of a sacral pressure ulcer on [DATE] and of the deterioration of the same sacral pressure on [DATE] for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident died in the facility on [DATE]. The diagnoses included metastatic cancer, heart failure, renal insufficiency and malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 8 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. On [DATE] at approximately 9:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to one resident (Resident #28) during wound care treatment to promote dignity and respect and failed to remind and assist 3 Residents (#146, #132 and #103) to vote in the November 2021 general election in the survey sample of 58 residents. The findings included: 1.Resident #28 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hyperlipidemia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, a fib, hypertensive, dementia, pressure ulcer of right heel, insomnia, and muscle weakness. Resident received wound treatment on 12/08/21 from Licence Practical Nurse (LPN) LPN #11. Resident #28 was assessed having a Basis Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of (7) seven. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated this resident had ADL (activities of daily living) deficits in self care, physical mobility, and maintaining adequate nutritional status. A revised care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were afforded the opportunity to formulate advance directives, and the advance directive was maintained in the clinical record, readily accessible to the direct care staff to convey upon transfer to the emergency medical personnel and/or the hospital for 5 of 58 residents (123, 55, 77, 146 and 170), in the survey sample The findings include: 1. Resident #123 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, heart failure, renal insufficiency and status post left great toe amputation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #123's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint investigation, staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident's representative of missed laboratory services for 3 residents (Resident #13, Resident #17 and Resident #170), and they failed to notify one representative of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #167), a closed record resident in the survey sample of 58 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident representative of missed blood work ordered on 11/01/21 for Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) for Resident #13. Resident #13 was originally admitted the nursing facility on 07/27/21. Diagnosis for Resident #13 included but not limited to Type II Diabetes and long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/21 coded the resident on the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide reasonable care for the protection of residents' property from loss and to return laundry in a timely manner for 3 of 58 residents (Resident #50, Resident #90 and Resident #138) in the survey sample. The findings included; 1.The facility staff failed to return Residents laundry in a timely manner and protect Resident's laundry from loss. Resident #50 was originally admitted to the facility 05/14/2021 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Non-displaced Fracture and Obesity. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/11/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #50 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring supervision of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility record review, the facility staff failed to recognize, assess and intervene (to follow physician orders for obtaining daily weights and act upon the spouse's concerns regarding edema to the resident's legs) on behalf of a resident presenting with an acute change in condition for 1 of 58 residents in the survey sample (Resident #123). The findings included: Resident #123 was originally admitted to the facility 9/28/21 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, heart failure, renal insufficiency and status post left great toe amputation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/4/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #123's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to treat, monitor and manage pain for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #138), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #138 was originally admitted to the facility 02/07/2021 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Chronic Pain Syndrome and Pain Unspecified. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/12/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #138 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as independent set-up help only with transfers, walking in the room, locomotion on and off the unit, eating and bathing. Requiring supervision after set-up help only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to procure narcotics timely for one resident (Resident #138) in a survey sample of 58 residents. The findings included: Resident #138 was originally admitted to the facility 02/07/2021 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Chronic Pain Syndrome and Pain Unspecified. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/12/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #138 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as independent set-up help only with transfers, walking in the room, locomotion on and off the unit, eating and bathing. Requiring supervision after set-up help only with dressing and personal hygiene. Requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was free from significant medication error (the staff failed to administer the intravenous (IV) antibiotic (Cefazolin 2 grams IV every 8 hours) as ordered from 11/16/21 through 12/2/21 for 1 of 58 residents (#55), in the survey sample The findings include: Resident #55 was originally admitted to the facility 10/14/21 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, a stroke with left hemiparesis and Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) related to a left arm abscess. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/18/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #55's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for laboratory services for 3 out of 58 residents (Resident #13, Resident #17 and Resident #170) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain Resident #13's blood work ordered on 11/01/21 for Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP). Resident #13 was originally admitted the nursing facility on 07/27/21. Diagnosis for Resident #13 included but not limited to Type II Diabetes and long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/21 coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a 03 of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #13 was coded total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with transfer, dressing, hygiene, bed mobility and toilet use and supervision with setup with eating for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the resident's foods preferences to meet nutritional needs for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #123), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #123 was originally admitted to the facility 9/28/21 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, heart failure, , renal insufficiency and status post left great toe amputation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/4/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #123's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bathing, extensive assistance of two people with transfers, extensive assistance of one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide documentation in the resident's clinical record of the influenza vaccine administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to vaccines for 2 of 58 residents (Resident #129 and 112), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #129 was originally admitted to the facility 11/11/21 and was discharged home 12/9/21. The current diagnoses included; COPD, hypertension, coronary, artery disease and a major depression disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/17/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #129's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. An interview was conducted with Resident #129 on 12/8/21 at approximately 11:25 a.m. The resident stated she would be discharged home on [DATE] after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-14 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the facility's COVID-19 recommended frequency of twice a week staff testing to include agency employees based on the level of community transmission. The findings included: An interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/09/21 at approximately 3:30 p.m. The DON said, there's no COVID-19 cases in the building. The DON stated, Vaccinated staff does not require testing but all unvaccinated staff are to be tested twice a week based on the community transmission. When asked if the facility has agency staffing in the building, the DON replied, Yes. When asked if they have their vaccination status, the DON replied, No, it's been requested from the agency but have not yet been received. The (IP) and DON were asked to provide the last 2 weeks of the as-worked schedule to include all agency staffing and to provide a copy of their vaccination status or their twice a week COVID-19 testing. On 12/10/21 at approximately 10:35 a.m., and again…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to promptly provide 1 out of 58 resident's (Resident #27) the services needed to meet their dental needs after knowing about broken dentures. The findings included: Resident #27 was originally admitted the nursing facility on 07/10/18. Diagnosis for Resident #27 included but not limited to Gastro-Esophageal Reflex Disease (GERD) and Iron Deficiency Anemia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/16/21 coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment for daily decision-making. The MDS coded Resident #27 supervision with eating. A significant change MDS was completed on 02/05/21. Under section L0200 (Dental) was coded for no natural teeth or tooth fragment(s) (edentulous). Review of Resident 27's admission Assessment/Screening document dated 07/10/18 documented the following under mouth: gums are pink/moist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, review of facility documents and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility's staff failed to accurately document in one residents medical record for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #167), a closed record, in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #167 was originally admitted to the facility 06/15/21 and discharged on 06/26/21 to an acute care hospital. The current diagnoses included; Cerebral Infarction and Aphasia. The discharge, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/26/21 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for short term memory problems as well as moderately impaired for daily decision making. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility and eating. Requires total dependence with transfers, locomotion on the unit, dressing, toilet use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide documentation in the resident's clinical record of the COVID-19 vaccine administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to vaccines for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #129), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #129 was originally admitted to the facility 11/11/21 and was discharged home 12/9/21. The current diagnoses included; COPD, hypertension, coronary, artery disease and a major depression disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/17/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #129's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. An interview was conducted with Resident #129 on 12/8/21 at approximately 11:25 a.m. The resident stated she would be discharged home on [DATE] after 5:00 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-10 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #139 was a [AGE] year old admitted originally to the facility on 4/30/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. resident #139's diagnoses included but were not limited to, Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 5/27/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11 out of a possible 15 indicating Resident #139 was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #139's MDS transmit history was reviewed and is documented as follows: 5/9/2019 Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated, Unplanned. 5/20/19 Re-Entry from Acute Hospital. Resident #139's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: 5/9/2019 at 12:43 P.M.: Change of Condition: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) went in to give patient lunch tray. Patient called for nurse, on observation patient had uncontrollable tremors. he stated he could not get warm. NP (Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-10 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident #139 was a [AGE] year old admitted originally to the facility on 4/30/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #139's diagnoses included but were not limited to, Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 5/27/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11 out of a possible 15 indicating Resident #139 was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #139's MDS transmit history was reviewed and is documented as follows: 5/9/2019 Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated, Unplanned. 5/20/19 Re-Entry from Acute Hospital. Resident #139's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: 5/9/2019 at 12:43 P.M.: Change of Condition: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) went in to give patient lunch tray. Patient called for nurse, on observation patient had uncontrollable tremors. he stated he could not get warm. NP (Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practices for 3 out of 63 residents (Residents #99, 421 and 47). 1. The facility staff failed to follow the physician orders for the administration of [NAME] hose for Resident #99. 2. The facility staff failed to obtain daily weights per physician orders starting on 06/06/19 for Resident #421. 3a. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to notify the physician for weight gain greater than 2 pounds on 5/29/19 per physician's order. 3b. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to accurately assess blisters to her right foot and implement a physician ordered treatment. The findings included: 1. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #99 included but not limited to *Type II Diabetes, *Congestive Heart Failure, *Edema and *Embolism. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information during a complaint investigation, clinical record review, staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #174) in the survey sample maintained a normal bowel elimination pattern. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #174 maintained a normal bowel elimination at least every 3 days. Resident #174 went 6 days without having a bowel movement. The findings included: Resident #174 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #174 included but not limited to *Amotrophic lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Constipation, Neurogenic Bladder and Small Bowel Obstruction. Resident #174's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/09/18 coded Resident # 174 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #174 total dependence of two with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, bathing and toilet use, total dependence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure pain management was provided to 2 of 63 residents in the survey sample (Residents #30 and #47) consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. 1a. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to document the location of pain; and attempt non-pharmacological pain interventions prior to the administration of PRN (as needed) pain medication on several occasions in May and June 2019. 1b. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to clarify two different orders for as needed (PRN) pain medications. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to document the location of pain; and failed to attempt non-pharmacological pain interventions prior to the administration of PRN (as needed) pain medication on several occasions in May of 2019. The findings include: 1a. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary pain medications for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #30 and #47. 1. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to attempt and/or offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication on several occasions in May and June of 2019. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to attempt and/or offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication on several occasions in May of 2019. The findings include: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to urinary tract infection, syncope (fainting) and collapse, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #30's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/15/19. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility staff failed to store and label food in a safe, sanitary manner. The findings included: On 06/04/2019 at 3:05 p.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor was escorted into the walk in freezer and the following observations were made: an open box of Tilapia Fillets, uncovered and not labeled; an opened, unsealed, and unlabeled bag of broccoli sitting on top of egg patties in a box; an opened box of egg patties not dated; and a second box of egg patties also observed to be opened, unsealed and not dated. The Dietary Aide stated, That's crazy. Broccoli, egg patties and Tilapia should be covered. On 06/10/2019 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager and he was asked, What should happen when a case of food is opened? The Dietary Manager stated, The box should be dated when it is opened and when it is to be used by. The Dietary Manager was asked, Should the bag of broccoli have been closed? The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to enhance and promote dignity for 7 residents during the dining experience in the Day Room on Unit 2 in the following ways: 1. Meals were served in an institutional manner to Residents on trays. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 (CNA) was standing with her hands on her hips while feeding a resident. 3. CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3 stood while feeding Residents. 4. CNAs placed clothing protectors on Residents without asking their permission. 5. CNA #2 turned off the TV because she felt a resident wasn't eating due to the TV being on. 6. CNA #2 was putting too much food on a spoon to feed a resident and not waiting for the resident to chew and swallow her food before giving her something to drink or eat. The findings included: On 06/07/2019 at approximately 1:08 PM, a Resident's family member approached surveyor in the conference room with concerns that her mother, Resident #124, would be left alone in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment during the dining observation on 06/07/19 in the Day room on unit two. Facility staff served resident meals on trays during the dining observation in the Day Room on unit one for lunch. The findings include: On 06/07/19 at 1:08 p.m., observation of dining in the Day Room was conducted. Seven residents were observed sitting in the activity room waiting for their meals. On 06/07/19 at 1:25 p.m., six residents were served their meals on trays. On 06/07/19 at approximately 2:06 PM an interview was conducted with LPN #9 (Unit Manager). Who stated Everyone had their trays in front of them. It would look better if they took the trays off. LPN #9 stated it was a Dignity Issue. On 06/07/2019 at approximately 2:30 PM interviews were conducted with CNA #1 and CNA #2. They were interviewed separately in the conference room concerning the above issues: CNA #1 was asked if meals should be served on trays? She stated that It's okay to keep food on trays for restorative care residents. CNA #2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 resident (Resident #148) of 63 residents in the survey sample, had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, unspecified site and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #148's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/22/2019 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 05 indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #148 as requiring extensive assistance of 1 for eating and dressing, extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility, transfer and toilet use and total dependence of 1 for personal hygiene and bathing. On 06/06/2019 at approximately 4:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Worker and she was asked, Does Resident #148 have a PASRR level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (Resident #148) of 63 residents in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include Diabetes Mellitus for Resident #148. The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, *Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, unspecified site. Resident #148's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/22/2019 coded the resident with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 05 indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #148 as requiring extensive assistance of 1 for eating and dressing, extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility, transfer and toilet use and total dependence of 1 for personal hygiene and bathing. Resident #148's MDS was also coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for three of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #47, 35 and 78. 1. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan when she acquired two blisters to her right medial and dorsum foot on 5/17/19, when the blisters had opened with a new treatment order, and when the blisters had resolved. 2. For Resident #35, facility staff failed to revise his care plan with a new diagnosis of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and his new order for oxygen. 3. The facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to to include how often to release a wheel chair seat belt used for Resident #78. The findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure that activities of daily living necessary to maintain personal grooming was provided for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #48. The facility staff failed to ensure that fingernail and facial hair care was provided to Resident #48 who was unable to carry out these activity of daily grooming tasks independently. The findings included: Resident #48 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, generalized muscle weakness, legal blindness and dementia. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a Significant Change with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/18/19. Resident #48's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a a 6 out of a possible 15 indicating the resident was cognitively impaired but capable of some daily decision making. Under Section B Hearing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #122) of 63 residents in the survey sample received care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility staff failed to obtain an order for a stabilization/fracture boot which resulted in cellulitis to a surgical incision wound; and the facility staff inaccurately assessed and documented the cellulitis as a Stage 3 pressure ulcer. The findings included: Resident #122 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, right tibial and fibular (lower leg) fracture and muscle weakness. Resident #122's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/03/2019 coded Resident #122 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #122 as requiring limited assistance of 1 for bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #164) in the survey sample who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain toenail care. The facility staff failed to ensure that podiatry services/nail care was provided to Resident #164. The findings included: Resident #164 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 03/05/19. Diagnoses for Resident #164 included but not limited to, Cerebral Infarction and heart failure. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/19 coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status as not able to complete the interview. Resident coded as having Short term and Long term memory problems. Indicating a moderate impairment for daily decision-making. Resident #164 was coded total dependence, two person physical assistance with personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #78) was transferred according to the comprehensive care plan to prevent potential accidents. The facility staff failed to transfer Resident #78 with a mechanical lift per the resident's plan of care. The findings included: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Cerebral Palsy and Autistic Disorder. Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/14/2019 coded Resident #78 with short-term memory problems, long-term memory problems and with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #78 as requiring total dependence of 2 with transfers and total dependence of 1 for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene, bathing and locomotion on unit. On 06/10/2019 at 2:05 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure one Resident (Resident #78) of 63 resident's in the survey sample, received appropriate treatment to prevent complications from enteral feeding. The facility staff failed to ensure safety precautions were followed to prevent potential complications from enteral feeding for Resident #78 during ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. The findings included: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Cerebral Palsy and Autistic Disorder. Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/14/2019 coded Resident #78 with short-term memory problems, long-term memory problems and with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #78 as requiring total dependence of 2 with transfers and total dependence of 1 for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to communicate an ongoing assessment for one (Resident #421) of 63 residents in the survey sample, for monitoring of complications before after dialysis treatment. The facility staff failed to communicate an ongoing assessment with the dialysis center where Resident #421 attended outpatient dialysis three days per week every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The findings included: Resident #421 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #421 included but not limited to *End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (Chronic irreversible kidney failure). The resident was receiving *hemodialysis treatments three times a week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due therefore no information was obtained from an MDS. The admission Assessment completed on 05/30/19 included the following: alert to person, place, time and situation with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility's medication storage review/inspection of 4 medication carts and 2 medication rooms, the facility staff failed to dispose of Resident #471's medications after the resident was discharged , and failed to ensure accountability for controlled medications awaiting final disposition. The findings include: Resident #471 was admitted to the facility from an acute care facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to Diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and chronic pain. The resident was discharged on [DATE]. On [DATE] at approximately 10:56 AM an inspection was made in the medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse #6 (LPN). LPN #6 was not able to get into a locked cabinet that she stated that expired narcotics or medications were put. She said that the only staff members that have a key to the cabinet is the Director Of Nurses (DON). She was asked to have the DON unlock the cabinet for inspection. On [DATE] at approximately 11:09 AM the unit manager LPN #2 returned with the key…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #102 and #107. The findings include: 1. For Resident #102, facility staff failed to document any monitoring of her skin tear obtained on 7/27/19; and failed to document when her skin tear had healed. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, and diabetes. Resident #102's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/30/19. Resident #102 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #102's nursing notes revealed that she had a fall on 7/27/19. The following nursing note was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices therefore, increasing the chance of spreading infections, illnesses and diseases for 3 of 63 residents in the survey sample (Residents #39, 113, &104) and 7 dining room residents. 1. The Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene before assisting 7 Residents during mealtime. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #39's indwelling catheter was managed in a manner to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and infections. 3. For Resident #113, facility staff failed to maintain his Foley catheter in a sanitary manner. 4. For Resident #104, facility staff failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. The Findings Included; 1. On 06/07/19 at approximately 1:25 PM during a dining room observation in the Dayroom on unit two, three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were observed serving, feeding and assisting seven residents during mealtime without performing hand hygiene in between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-09-08 · tag F0371 — pattern
    Store, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to prepare, store, distribute and serve food in a safe, sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to ensure that the kitchen was free from pests to include roaches and drain flies, maintain a clean stove and oven that were free from copious amounts of grease and burnt debris, and ensure that an air gap was in place from the two food steamer units drain pipe to the floor drain. The findings included: On 9/6/17 at 7:55 a.m. during the initial kitchen tour the following observations were made: The two kitchen food steamer units were connected to one water drain pipe that was flush with and touching the floor drain. There was no visible air gap present. The six burner stove was noted to have large pieces of crusty burnt debris and a thick grease layer on and around all the burner. The three ovens were observed to have burnt/spillage debris on the oven floors and the oven racks were coated in thick black grease with raised areas of burnt food debris visible. One dead roach was observed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-09-08 · tag F0469 — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of pests. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that the kitchen was free from pests to include roaches and drain flies. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure the facility was free from ants. The findings included: On 9/6/17 at 7:55 a.m. during the initial kitchen tour the following observations were made: One dead roach was observed on the floor between a three sink compartment unit and the pan drying rack. Also two live roaches were observed crawling on the floor in the main kitchen area under the sinks and crawling on the walls. In the dishwasher area five gray drain flies were observed crawling on the top and inside of the grease trap drain. On 9/6/17 at 8:15 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Dietary Aide. The Dietary Aide was asked if there are issues with roaches and pests in the kitchen. The Dietary Aide stated, We have them every now and then. The bug man comes in and sprays. On 7/6/17 at 11:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0176 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and the facility staff failed to assess one of 26 Residents in the survey sample (Resident #15) ability to self administer Voltaren Gel. The findings included: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #15 included but are not limited to Chronic Pain. Resident #15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/28/17, coded Resident #15 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Quarterly MDS coded Resident #15 as being independent in Dressing, Eating, Toilet use and Hygiene. Resident #15 was coded as not being observed ambulating and having a wheel chair and walker as mobility devices. On 9/6/17 at approximately 9:45 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #15 sitting on her bed with a tube of Voltaren* Gel lying on the bed beside her. On 9/7/17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0278 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 26 residents (Resident #17), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to code Resident #17's MDS assessment correctly at section A1500 through A1550. The findings included: Resident #17 was originally admitted to the facility 10/15/1998 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute illness resulting in hospitalization. The current diagnoses included; a developmental disorder, cerebral palsy, an autistic disorder and mental retardation (MR). The quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/14/17 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. The resident was also coded as having no speech, rarely to never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0280 — isolated
    Allow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to update a comprehensive person centered care plan after a fall for one of 26 residents (Resident #10) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #10's comprehensive care plan to include a fall on 02/12/17. The findings included: Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #10 included but not limited to muscle weakness (1) and Alzheimer's (2). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/15/17 coded the resident with a 6 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #10 with extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one with bathing. The comprehensive care plan was reviewed on 12/12/16; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0431 — isolated
    Maintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to date two open multidose vials of insulin for 2 out of 26 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #20) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to date an opened multidose vial of Novolog (1) insulin (Resident #19). 2. The facility staff failed to date an opened multidose vial of Humalog (2) insulin (Resident #20). The findings included: 1. Resident #19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (3) (DM). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/19/17 coded the resident with a score of 99 indicating severely impaired with daily decision making. On 09/7/17 at 9:10 a.m., during inspection of the medication room on Unit 1, located in the medication refrigerator was one unlabeled multidose vial of Novolog insulin. The surveyor asked LPN #1, when was the insulin opened, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0504 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by the attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for one out of 26 residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for the following: Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) (1) and Hemoglobin A1C (2) for the month of August 2017. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #1 included but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (3) and Heart Failure (4). Resident #1's most recent MDS assessment was a comprehensive assessment with an ARD of 5/31/17. The Resident was coded with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #1 requiring total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with transfers, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-09-08 · tag F0514 — isolated
    Keep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately document medical record information for one of 26 residents (Resident #17), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to accurately document information on Resident #17's Screening for Mental Illness, Mental Retardation/Intellectual Disability, or Related Conditions assessments. The findings included: Resident #17 was originally admitted to the facility 10/15/1998 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute illness resulting in hospitalization. The current diagnoses included; a developmental disorder, cerebral palsy, an autistic disorder and mental retardation (MR). The quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/14/17 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. The resident was also coded as having no speech,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,577 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,180 — penalty dated 2024-01-04
  • $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHESAPEAKE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EK 2005 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LL 2013 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MZR EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SILVERSTONE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LAND, IRVINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/26/2024
RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.2M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 20%Other / private 15%

This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$377per resident / day
operating cost
$11,455per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$392per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495108. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2021-12-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next