Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation Center
200 Hioaks Road, Richmond, VA 23225 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (804) 272-2918 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2022
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,197 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 81.6% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.6% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.7% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 73.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 229 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.4%CMS range 54.0–66.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.5–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.4–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services to maintain the highest practicable wellbeing for one resident, (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 2 residents resulting in harm for Resident #1. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to assess and monitor the Resident's respiratory status and intervene with appropriate measures prior to the death of the Resident who was suffering labored breathing & respiratory difficulty. No other tracheostomy Residents were residing in the facility at the time of survey so could not be added to the sample. Resident #1 was a discharged Resident so a closed record review was conducted. The Resident was originally admitted to the facility from the hospital on 5-4-24 with diagnoses including; Acute Osteomyelitis to the right shoulder (primary diagnosis) and a history of Laryngeal cancer with total laryngectomy surgical removal in 1987, anemia, diabetes, hypertension, dementia without behavior disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a comprehensive care plan for respiratory care and services to maintain the highest practicable wellbeing for one resident, (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 2 residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to assess and monitor the Resident's respiratory status and intervene with appropriate measures prior to the death of the Resident who was suffering labored breathing & respiratory difficulty. No other tracheostomy Residents were residing in the facility at the time of survey so could not be added to the sample. Resident #1 was a discharged Resident so a closed record review was conducted. The Resident was originally admitted to the facility from the hospital on 5-4-24 with diagnoses including; Acute Osteomyelitis to the right shoulder (primary diagnosis) and a history of Laryngeal cancer with total laryngectomy surgical removal in 1987, anemia, diabetes, hypertension, dementia without behavior disorder, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain the professional standards of medication administration in nursing practice for two Residents (Resident # 6 and #37) in a survey sample of 50 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 6, the facility staff failed to administer medications and treatments on several dates as ordered by the physician Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Dementia, contractures and sepsis. Resident #6's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/12/2024 was a quarterly assessment. The MDS coded Resident # 6 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS coded Resident # 6 as requiring extensive to total staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Resident # 6 was coded as incontinent of bowel and bladder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information obtained during resident group interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to assist 3 residents (#17, #1, and #27) to exercise their right to vote in the November 2023 general election in the survey sample of 50 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility failed to remind and assist Resident #17, to vote in the November 2023 general election. Resident #17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, muscle weakness, and constipation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/16/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #17's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 5/7/24 at approximately 1:00 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 5/14/24 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the above findings were shared with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Consultant. An opportunity was offered to the facility's staff to present additional information, but no additional information was provided. Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, family interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to inform, educate, formulate, and document information concerning the right to have an advanced directive for 2 of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #106, and Resident #55. The findings include: 1. On admission the facility staff failed to inform and educate Resident #106 about advanced directives. The facility staff failed to assist in helping the resident to formulate an advanced directive if she would have wanted one. The facility staff failed to document in the progress notes any interaction to support that they provided any of the above to Resident #106. The facility failed to document that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, a review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to notify family of an abnormal lab and transfer to a local hospital for 1 of 50 (Resident #172), a closed record resident. The findings included: Resident #172 was originally admitted to the facility 05/27/2022 and discharged on 6/02/22. The current diagnoses included but was not limited to acute kidney failure. The entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) 06/02/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 9 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #172 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/02/22 coded resident discharged with return anticipated. In sectionGG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring set-up help with eating, oral hygiene. Dependent on staff for oral hygiene and toileting hygiene. The care plan read…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to send a copy of the resident's care plan to include their goals after being transferred to the hospital for 1 of 50 residents (Resident #172), a closed record sample in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #172 was originally admitted to the facility 05/27/2022 and discharged on 6/02/22. The current diagnoses included acute kidney failure. The entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) 06/02/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 9 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #172 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/02/22 coded resident as being discharged with return anticipated. In sectionGG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring set-up help with eating, oral hygiene. Dependent with oral hygiene and toileting hygiene. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a discharge and admission to a local hospital for 3 of 50 residents (Residents #101, #172, and #176 ) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility 11/7/23 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/25/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 11 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #101's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. A review of Resident #101's nurses note dated 1/20/24 at 10:28 AM read patient was sent to emergency room at the local hospital due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a written copy of the bed hold policy to the responsible party when two Residents were transferred to the hospital (Resident #176, and #172) in a survey sample of 50 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 176, the facility staff failed to provide a written copy of the bed hold policy to the responsible party when transferred to hospital on [DATE]. Resident # 176 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, fracture of the left knee, prosthetic knee joint, diastolic congestive heart failure, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction and asthma. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a Quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 10/18/2022. The MDS coded Resident # 176 with severe cognitive impairment. Resident # 176…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two Residents (Resident #40, and #179) in a survey sample of 50 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #40, the facility staff failed to care plan oxygen saturation and titration of oxygen administration to meet the needs of the Resident. Resident #40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident went out to the hospital on 3-19-24 with acute hypoxia, and returned on 4-10-24 to the facility with diagnoses including; Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute pulmonary edema, morbid obesity, asthma, iron deficiency anemia, diabetes, and shortness of breath. Resident #40's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a discharge assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4-29-24. Resident #40 was Alert and oriented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 Resident (Resident # 176) in the survey sample of 50 residents. Findings included: For Resident # 176, the facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary after the a transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident # 176 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, fracture of the left knee, prosthetic knee joint, diastolic congestive heart failure, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction and asthma. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a Quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 10/18/2022. The MDS coded Resident # 176 with severe cognitive impairment. Resident # 176 required extensive assistance of one to two staff persons with ADLs (activities of daily living). Functional status for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide care and services necessary to maintain good grooming for one resident (Resident # 6) in a survey sample of 50 residents. Findings included: For Resident # 6, the facility staff failed to provide grooming/nail care resulting in fingernails over 1/2 inch long on contracted hands. Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Dementia, contractures and sepsis. Resident #6's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/12/2024 was a quarterly assessment. The MDS coded Resident # 6 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS coded Resident # 6 as requiring extensive to total staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Resident # 6 was coded as incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the clinical record was conducted 5/7/2024-5/14/2024. Review of the ADL documentation report for April 2024 and May 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services for pressure wounds for two Residents (Residents # 6 & # 87) in a survey sample of 50 Residents. 2. For Resident #87, the facility staff failed to administer wound care according to physician orders. The Findings Included: 1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to provide nail care to reduce the risk of development of new pressure wounds in the palms of the hands and failed to consistently provide treatments for pressure wound care per physician orders. Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Dementia, contractures and sepsis. Resident #6's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/12/2024 was a quarterly assessment. The MDS coded Resident # 6 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services to maintain the highest practicable wellbeing for one resident, (Resident #40) in a survey sample of 50 residents, . The findings included: For Resident #40, the facility staff failed to assess and monitor the Resident's oxygen saturation and titrate oxygen administration to meet the needs of the Resident. Further, oxygen treatment orders were unclear, not followed, and not care planned for nursing staff guidance. Resident #40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident went out to the hospital on 3-19-24 with acute hypoxia, and returned on 4-10-24 to the facility with diagnoses including; Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute pulmonary edema, morbid obesity, asthma, iron deficiency anemia, diabetes, and shortness of breath. Resident #40's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based in information obtained during the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week which could potentially affect all residents. The findings included; During the nursing staff review from June 2022 through May 2024. The facility staff was unable to verify RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive days on the following dates for eleven (11) days: 7/03/23, 7/04/23, 7/05/23, 7/08/23,7/16/23, 8/05/23, 8/06/23, 9/09/23, 9/10/23, 10/15/23, and 10/22/23. The above dates were verified by the scheduling coordinator on 5/14/24 at approximately 11:30 AM. On 5/14/24 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Consultant. The administrator said that coverage should have been provided.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by a physician for one (Resident #179) in a survey sample of 50 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #179, Intravenous (IV) Antibiotics were unavailable during an acute post operative infection. Resident #179, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:30 PM, and discharged on 1-29-24 after 8:00 AM. Diagnoses included; After care following joint replacement surgery, infection due to right knee internal prosthetic, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, obesity, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resident #179's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1-29-24 was coded as a discharge assessment. Resident #179 was coded as having no cognitive impairment. Resident #179 was also coded as requiring supervision or limited dependence on one staff member to perform activities of daily living, such as hygiene, transferring, and bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to prevent significant medication errors for one Resident (Residents #179) in a survey sample of 50 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #179, the facility staff failed to administer Intravenous (IV) antibiotics after an infection from a status post knee replacement with acute hospitalization follow up for the post operative infection. Resident #179, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:30 PM, and discharged on 1-29-24 after 8:00 AM. Diagnoses included; After care following joint replacement surgery, infection due to right knee internal prosthetic, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, obesity, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resident #179's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1-29-24 was coded as a discharge assessment. Resident #179 was coded as having no cognitive impairment. Resident #179 was also coded as requiring supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide multiple care and services in accordance with professional standards and according to physician orders for two Residents (Resident #259, #159) in a survey sample of 46 Residents. The findings included: 1a. For Resident #259 the facility staff failed to provide medications timely. On 5/22/22 and 5/23/22, a closed clinical record review was conducted. The physician orders and medication administration records (MAR's) were reviewed for Resident #259's entire stay at the facility, which was from November 2021, through February 2022. On 5/23/22, the facility staff provided Surveyor F with a listing of medication administration times for several specific days. Review of these documents revealed the following: * On 12/21/21, medications scheduled to be administered at 9 AM, were not administered until 4:10 PM. * On 1/8/22, medications scheduled to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors regarding 4 medications for two Residents, (Resident #29 & #259) in a sample of 46 residents. The findings included; 1. For Resident #29, the Resident was given two doses of an anticoagulant significant drug, instead of the single dose ordered by the physician. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic ischemic heart disease, and valve replacement, requiring anticoagulant medication therapy. On Monday 5-23-22 at 8:00 a.m., during the Medication administration pour and pass observations with LPN (G), Resident #29's medications were observed while being prepared for administration, and was observed receiving those medications. The Resident was observed receiving 16 total medications to include the following medications of concern; Warfarin 5 milligrams (mg), and Warfarin 7.5 mg. both given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-24 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for 5 Residents, Residents #106, #69, #62, #104, and #310, in a sample of 8 Residents reviewed for new admission COVID-19 testing. The findings included: For Residents #106, #69, #62, #104, and #310, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing upon their admission to the facility. On 5/23/22, a clinical record review was conducted and revealed no evidence of any COVID-19 testing for the previously referenced Residents. On 5/23/22 at approximately 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) who confirmed the facility conducts COVID-19 testing for all residents in accordance with CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations. The IP was asked about the facility's protocol for testing newly admitted residents for COVID-19 and she stated, all new admits are tested [for COVID-19] within 5-7 days after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, and staff interview the facility staff failed to comply with the requirements of advanced directives for 4 out of 46 residents on 05/24/22. The findings included: For Residents #25, #66, #102, and #359 the facility failed to provide written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. On 05/24/22, at approximately 1:30 p.m. a review of the electronic health record (EHR) for Residents #25, #66, #102, and #359 was conducted. The review noted that the record failed to contain Advanced Directives or written information about formulating an Advanced Directive. The facility's policy and procedures with an effective date 03/24/20 were reviewed. The policies read that documents of declaration for advance directives that are approved by state law (i.e. Living Wills, Durable Power of Attorney, appointments for anatomical gifts/organ donations) will be placed in the medical record as provided or legally designated agent/representative. On 05/24/22, at approximately 2:15 p.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to prevent abuse for one Resident (Resident #71) in a sample size of 46 Residents. Specifically, a nurse aide left Resident #71 on the floor after a fall and closed the room door on 12/20/2021. The findings included: On 05/22/2022 at approximately 12:45 P.M., Resident #71 and a family member were interviewed by Surveyor E. When asked about any concerns, Resident #71 and the family indicated that Resident #71 had a fall recently and had to crawl out toward the room door to get help. The family member also stated that she was made aware the facility did an investigation and the staff member was terminated. On 05/23/2022 at approximately 9:30 A.M., the administrator was interviewed. When asked about any facility-reported incidents involving a staff member and [Resident #71], the administrator stated that the previous administrator did not conduct an investigation but when she herself learned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse for one Resident (Resident #71) in a sample size of 46 Residents. The findings included: On 05/23/2022 at approximately 9:30 A.M., the administrator was interviewed. When asked about any facility-reported incidents involving a staff member and [Resident #71], the administrator stated that the previous administrator did not conduct an investigation but when she herself learned about the allegation of abuse [by adult protective services], she investigated it. The administrator also stated that there were inconsistencies in the Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA)'s story (TNA C) so she was terminated and no longer works at the facility. The administrator explained that TNA C denied working with [Resident #71] that day but the facility investigation revealed that TNA C did indeed work with Resident #71 that day. On 05/23/2022, Resident #71's clinical record was reviewed. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility documentation review, and staff interview the facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #31's minimum data set at sections N0300 and N0350. The findings include: On 05/23/22, an electronic health record (EHR) review at approximately 2:00 p.m. of Resident #31's MDS was conducted. At sections N0300 (record the number of days that injections of any type were received during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) and N0350 (record the number of days insulin injections were received during the last 7 days or since admission /entry if less than 7 days) were each coded as a 7. Subsequently, a record review of Resident #31's physician pharmacy orders in the EHR did not substantiate the MDS Coordinator's coding of 7 at N0300 and N0350. That is, there was no insulin order present in the EHR. On 05/23/22, at approximately 2:30 p.m., the MDS coordinator was interviewed. The MDS coordinator searched the referenced MDS at sections N0300 and N0350 in the EHR. As a result, the MDS coordinator verbally acknowledged both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide ADL assistance with regards to bathing/showering, for a Resident who was dependent upon staff to maintain personal hygiene, for one Resident (Resident #259) in a survey sample of 46 Residents. The findings included: On 5/22/22 and 5/23/22, a closed clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed Resident #259 scheduled shower days were, Wednesday and Saturdays. The clinical record revealed no evidence that Resident #259 was offered a shower on the following dates: 11/27/21, 12/15/21, 12/25/21, 12/29/21, 1/1/22, 1/15/22, 1/26/22, and 1/29/22. Review of Resident #259's MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) coded the Resident as having required extensive assistance of on staff member for bathing. On 5/23/22, the facility staff provided the survey team with a shower schedule which did reveal Residents are scheduled for two baths/showers per week. On 5/23/22 at 1:46 PM, an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide an influenza vaccine for 1 resident out of 5 residents reviewed for influenza immunization. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide influenza immunization for Resident #57. On 5/24/22, clinical record review was performed for Resident #57 and revealed the last documented influenza immunization occurred on 9/30/20. A physician's order dated 5/22/14 read, Flu Vaccine Annually as indicated. There was no documentation of the flu vaccine being offered, refused, contraindicated, or administered for 2021. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing who accessed the clinical records for Resident #57 and verified the findings. A facility policy on influenza immunization was requested and received. Review of the facility policy, effective date 2/6/20, entitled, Influenza & Pneumococcal Vaccinations, subheading Policy, read: Vaccination against influenza will be offered to Center patients and staff annually and subheading Procedure, item 1-c,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-02-14 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to employ staff with the skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. Facility failed to designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who is a certified dietary manager after one year of employment. The findings included: On 2/13/19 during a record review it was identified that Employee E was hired on 1/22/18. During interview with Employees D & E on 2/13/19 at 4:40 pm she stated I have not enrolled in a Certified Dietary Manager Course yet. During a staff interview with Employee D on 2/13/19, she provided the surveyor with a Serv Safe certificate and stated that the employee on the certificate, last day was yesterday, on 2/12/19. No other staff are Serv Safe Certified. The Administrator and Corporate Dietitian were notified of findings on 2/14/19.
- Potential for harm · F2019-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Facility staff failed to accurately monitor food temperatures, hold food at appropriate temperature, and reheat food to appropriate temperature. The findings included: On 2/12/19 at 8:35 AM, during observation of the walk-in freezer there were opened, uncovered, undated tortilla shells in freezer and hot dogs in freezer without an open date. During an interview the cook (employee H) stated if they were opened and undated, the items should be thrown away. During the observation of the walk-in cooler, grapes were noted in a zip lock bag (not in original packaging) without a date. The cook stated the date should have been written in the white writable area of the bag. Review of facility documentation of Freezer temperature logs revealed an employee had recorded freezer temperatures on 2/12/19 to be at 20 degrees Fahrenheit. The cook stated she recorded the temperature this morning and when asked, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility records and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The facility had gnats flying throughout the kitchen and on clean dishes. The findings included: On 2/12/19 8:35am during the initial tour of the kitchen gnats were noted to be on cutting boards, gnats inside the open cover of clean food service cart with dishes and flying throughout the kitchen area. It was also observed to be multiple cups of vinegar sitting through the kitchen in hand washing areas, food prep areas and dish washing areas. An Interview with staff member E stated that the pest control representative comes regularly and due to the gnat problem he put out cups of vinegar. On 02/14/19 at 09:00 AM, observation of the kitchen gnats were observed on two cutting boards over the three compartment sink and on the serving utensils hanging over the 3 compartment sink. Multiple gnats were noted to be flying through the entire kitchen area and a bowl of food being prepared was on the food prep table uncovered. Review of facility records revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified experience for one resident (Resident # 308) in a survey sample of 38 residents. For Resident # 308, the facility staff was observed standing while feeding breakfast. Findings included: Resident #308, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Epilepsy, dysphasia, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Type 2 Diabetes. There was no Minimum Data Set assessment because it was too soon. In the admission assessment, Resident # 308 was assessed as having cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living to include eating. Resident # 308's physician orders signed 5/30/18 were reviewed. Included was an order dated 1/18/18 1:1 assist with meals. On 2/13/19 at 8:41 a.m., Resident #308 was observed in his room during the breakfast meal. The breakfast meal tray was on the over bed table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for Resident #406 in a survey sample of 38 residents, to ensure the right to be informed of transportation arrangements. Resident #406's transportation to a medical office was not clarified to allow the responsible party (RP) to go with the resident. The findings included: Resident #406 was a resident of the facility but had no MDS (minimum data set-an assessment protocol) on the record. Review of the nurse's notes dated 11-15-17 revealed the resident had returned from the medical appointment on 11-15-17. There was no note as to the transfer time, date or how transferred in the medical record. On 2-13-19 at 3:45 PM, an interview was conducted with the discharge planner as the DON (director of nursing) or the unit manager named in the complaint no longer worked in the facility. The discharge planner remembered the event as she had talked with the unit manager when it happened. She stated that there was confusion as to whether the daughter was going to transport the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure her wishes for advance directives were recorded accurately for one resident (Resident #156) in a survey sample of 38 residents. Resident #156's advanced directives were not located on the electronic record or in the nurse's code book at the nurse's station. The findings included: Resident #156 was a resident of the facility. On 2-13-19 at 11:07 AM a review of the electronic clinical record revealed no orders for advanced directives. The NP (nurse practitioner) notes documented a no code status. Review of the care plan dated 2-5-19 documented Hospice orders for end of life care. On 2-14-19 at approximately 3:00 PM, the Corporate Nurse Consultant stated the nurse's use a book at the nurse's station to determine the resident's code status. On 2-14-19 at 3:31 PM An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse- C), LPN C was asked how they determine someone's code status. LPN C stated, We look in the code book. However, the resident's code status was not listed in the book. On 2-14-19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure visual privacy for one resident, Resident #155, in a survey sample of 38 residents. Resident #155 was exposed during her bed bath. The findings included: Resident #155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An MDS (minimum data set-an assessment protocol) had not been completed due to recent admission. The resident was alert and oriented to all spheres, she was noted to have contractures of all extremities, had a flat call alarm. The resident stated she had to have total care for her bath. During the initial interview, the resident voiced concerns her nether regions were not being cleaned sufficiently, especially around the catheter. On 2-13-19 at 9:25 AM, Resident #155's bathing was observed. The resident gown was removed, placed at the far end of the bed and during the entire bath, the resident was uncovered completely. There were four individuals in the room including two CNA's (certified nursing assistant), a Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for two Residents (Residents #93, and Resident #94, in a survey sample of 38 residents. 1. Resident #93 did not have a comprehensive care plan for activities and assistance with eating. 2. For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to develop an accurate, resident-centered care plan by including a leg brace intervention that was not ordered by the physician or recommended by occupational therapy. The findings included: 1. Resident #93 did not have a comprehensive care plan for activities and assistance with eating. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, chronic back pain requiring opioids, congestive heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident # 93's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-25-19. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for 1 resident (Resident # 304) in a survey sample of 38 residents. For Resident #304, facility staff failed to provide morning care to include oral care prior to serving breakfast. The finding included: Review of the clinical record was conducted on 2/12/2019. Resident # 304, an [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled services related to a right femur fracture. Diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, History of Crohn's Disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and debility/weakness. There was no Minimum Data Set assessment done as it was not due at the time of survey. Review of the admission Nursing Assessment revealed Resident #304 was coded as having no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person assistance with activities of daily living to include eating. On 2/12/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to assess and provide on-going resident-centered activities for one Resident (Resident #93) out of a sample of 38 residents. Resident #93 was observed to be in his room for 3 days without getting out of bed and with no meaningful activities provided. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, chronic back pain requiring opioids, congestive heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident # 93's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-25-19. Resident #93 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as moderately impaired. Resident #93 required extensive to total assistance of all ADL's (activities of daily living such as bed mobility) except for eating, in which she required supervision of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to, for one Resident, Resident #93 of 38 residents in the survey sample, ensure interventions to prevent pressure ulcers were in place. Resident #93's orange service light was on through multiple observations and her heels were not elevated off the mattress. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, chronic back pain requiring opioids, congestive heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident # 93's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-25-19. Resident #93 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as moderately impaired. Resident #93 required extensive to total assistance of all ADL's (activities of daily living such as bed mobility) except for eating, in which she required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide intervention (wedge pillow) to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one Resident (Resident # 94) in a sample size of 38 residents. The findings include: Resident #94, a [AGE] year old female, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to dementia, debility, depression, and anxiety. Resident #94's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/2018 and was coded as an annual assessment. Resident #94 was not coded for a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as severely impaired. Functional status for dressing and personal hygiene was coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. Functional limitation in range of motion in lower extremities was coded as impaired on both sides. On 02/12/19 at 01:24 PM, Resident #94 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to, for one resident, Resident #155 in a survey sample of 38 residents, ensure the indwelling catheter was cleaned in a manner to prevent infection. Resident #155's catheter care was not performed appropriately (cleansed form back to front, bringing bacteria toward the catheter). The findings included: Resident #155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An MDS (minimum data set-an assessment protocol) had not been completed due to recent admission. The resident had an indwelling catheter due to urinary retention. On 2-13-19 at 11:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the resident. Resident #155 was alert and oriented to all spheres, she was noted to have contractures of all extremities, had a flat call alarm. The resident stated she had to have total care for her bath. During the initial interview, the resident voiced concerns her nether regions were not being cleaned sufficiently, especially around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a physician ordered nutritional supplement, and failed to implement interventions for further weight loss for one resident (Resident #93) of 38 residents in the survey sample. Resident #93 did not receive her supplements or whole milk, did not receive her substitute meal cut into bite sized pieces and did not receive supervision for her meals. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, chronic back pain requiring opioids, congestive heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident # 93's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-25-19. Resident #93 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as moderately impaired. Resident #93 required extensive to total assistance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility and clinical record documentation, the facility staff failed to, for one resident, Resident #60, in a survey sample of 38 residents, provide respiratory care and services to maintain the highest practicable wellbeing. Resident #60's filter for the oxygen concentrator was dusty. The findings included: Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), anemia and coronary artery disease. Resident # 60's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-4-19. Resident #60's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of a possible 15, or mild cognitive impairment. Resident #60 required set up assistance of all ADL's (activities of daily living such as bed mobility). The resident was coded as using oxygen in the past 7 days. On 2-12-19 at 10:34 AM, during an observation, the resident was observed receiving 2 liters of oxygen by a nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature for two Residents (Resident #304, #305) in a sample size of 38 residents. 1. For Resident # 304, the facility staff failed to provide a hot breakfast on 2/12/19 and 2/13/19. 2. For Resident #305, the pizza was cold. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 304, the facility staff failed to provide a hot breakfast on 2/12/19 and 2/13/19. Resident # 304, an [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled services related to a right femur fracture. Diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, History of Crohn's Disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and debility/weakness. There was no Minimum Data Set assessment done as it was not due at the time of survey. Review of the admission Nursing Assessment revealed Resident #304 was coded as cognitively intact, continent of bowel and bladder and required assistance with activities of daily living. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet for 2 residents (Residents #93, and #91), in a survey sample of 38 residents. 1. Resident #93 did not receive her diet as ordered to include whole milk and minced foods. 2. Resident #91 did not receive minced green beans. Resident was observed to be coughing during her meal. The findings included: 1. Resident #93 did not receive her diet as ordered to include whole milk and minced foods. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, chronic back pain requiring opioids, congestive heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident # 93's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1-25-19. Resident #93 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as moderately impaired. Resident #93…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,197 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,197 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEAUFONT HOLDINGS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/28/2021 |
| AK 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| AL 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CENTRAL BAY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/28/2021 |
| CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MRCZ CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 & FAMILY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| PIVOTAL CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAS 1998 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| TERRELL, JONATHAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/07/2023 |
| RYBST CENTRAL MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/28/2021 |
18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495260. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.