No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Health And Rehabilitation Center

112 N Constitution Dr, Yorktown, VA 23692 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (757) 890-0675 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (757) 890-0675 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Nov 2023
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2023
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
222 Grafton Dr · (757) 898-7737 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6500 George Washington Mem Hwy Ste C · (757) 947-1244 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.4 mi
5210 George Washington Memorial Hwy · (757) 898-5023 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1314 Wolf Trap Rd · (757) 890-3500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5440 George Washington Memorial Hwy · (757) 898-6412

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.2%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.2%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%20.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.1%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.3%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.6%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.431.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.401.481.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 245 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.1%CMS range 53.4–65.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.4–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting83.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge86.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.3–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
68.7%
Total nursing turnover
92.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-02-08)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2021-07-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility failed to prevent pressure sore formation, for one resident (Resident #3) in a sample of 3 residents.For Resident #3 the facility failed to provide consistent and accurate skin care assessments, provide available prevention techniques, wound care monitoring, and treatment for Resident #3 who suffered an avoidable sacral pressure ulcer. The findings included. Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute stroke with craniotomy and paralysis on his (dominant) right side, dysphagia with peg feeding tube insertion, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cardiomyopathy, bell's palsy, prostatic hypertrophy, foley urinary catheter, and a renal mass. Resident #3's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9-16-25 was coded as a significant change assessment. The Resident was coded as severe cognitive loss. Resident #3 was coded as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one Resident (Resident #3) in the survey sample of 3 Residents. The findings included. For Resident #3 the facility staff failed to complete accurate skin assessments weekly before and after identifying a pressure sore, failed to document accurate Braden scale assessments upon admission for a high-risk resident and further after finding an unstageable pressure sore, and failed to accurately document the pressure ulcer presence in skilled nursing and physician progress notes. Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute stroke with craniotomy and paralysis on his (dominant) right side, dysphagia with peg feeding tube insertion, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cardiomyopathy, bell's palsy, prostatic hypertrophy, foley urinary catheter, and a renal mass. Resident #3's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the posting of nurse staffing information on the nursing unit. The findings included: During the initial tour of the facility on 1/14/2025 at 11:00 a.m., there was no observation of nurse staffing data posted. The facility only had one nursing unit. There was no posting in the lobby area nor in the main hall of the facility. On 1/14/2025 at 4:15 p.m., there was no observation of nurse staffing data posted on the unit. On 1/15/2025 at 9:45 a.m., there was no observation of nurse staffing data posted on the unit. On 1/15/2025 at 3:55 p.m., there was no observation of nurse staffing data posted on the unit. On 1/15/2025 at 3:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with a visitor who stated he visited the facility daily to spend time with his wife who resided there. When asked how he knew how many staff members were working when he visited, he stated he didn't ever know a number but would look for staff when he needed them. The visitor stated he had never seen the staffing posted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure the care plan was revised for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for code status. The care plan did not accurately indicate the correct code status of the resident (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility 12/9/24. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included discitis/ unspecified/lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, morbid obesity due to excess calories, and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/16/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. On 1/15/25 at 12:37 PM an interview was conducted with the Regional Nurse Consultant and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to follow the professional standards of quality regarding documentation for 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 1 ), in survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE]. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included discitis/ unspecified/lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, morbid obesity due to excess calories, and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. On [DATE] at 12:21 PM an interview was conducted with the Regional Nurse Consultant and the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to provide supervision for a dependent resident who rolled off of the bed causing pain and discomfort for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility 09/12/24 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Unspecified Osteoarthritis and History of Falling. The 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/22/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #3 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goals) the resident was coded as dependent with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe, lower body, requiring partial/moderate assistance with upper body, requiring set-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on information obtained during the as worked nursing schedule nursing staff, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week which could potentially affect all residents. The facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The findings included: A review of the as worked schedules dated 12/23/24, 1/04/25 and 1/11/25 reveal that the facility staff was unable to verify 8 consecutive hours a day of RN coverage for at least 3 days. The above dates were verified by the Scheduling Coordinator on 1/16/25 at approximately 1:40 PM. A final interview was conducted on 1/16/25 at approximately 1:00 PM., with the Administrator. The administrator said that there should be RN, 8 hours coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Registered Nurse coverage 8 consecutive hours per day for 9 days out of 32 days sampled. The findings include: Facility staff failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in December 2023 on 12/9, 12/10, 12/23, 12/24, 12/30, 12/31, and in January 2024 on 1/5, 1/6, and 1/7. On 2/6/24 at approximately 1:15 PM, a routine interview was conducted with the facility Administrator with regard to RN staffing coverage at the facility and he stated, We have had some challenges with RN coverage at times, but we are managing with no further elaboration. A request was made for the facility's clinical staffing records from 12/8/23 through 1/8/24, to include the payroll records for the Director of Nursing during the same time frame. On 2/7/24, a review of the records revealed there was no RN coverage for the 9 of the 32 sampled days. On 2/7/24 at approximately 3:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility Administrator who verified the findings and stated, We do the best we can, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed notify the responsible party of a change in condition for one resident (Resident # 154 ) in a survey sample of 23 residents. Findings included: For Resident # 154, the facility staff failed to notify the family of a change of condition (a fall with a head injury) and transfer to the hospital on 1/3/2024. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 11/30/2023 which coded Resident # 1 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the closed electronic clinical record was conducted on 2/5/2024 to 2/8/2024. Review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident # 154 did fall in the hall on 1/3/2024. Review of the clinical record revealed that there was a transfer form dated 1/3/2024 completed by LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)- B which documented the next of kin/responsible party was notified of Resident # 154's transfer to the hospital after a fall with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of medication administration for 2 residents, Residents #204 and #33, in a survey sample of 23 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #204, facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician on 12/10/23. On 2/7/24 the clinical record for Resident #204 was reviewed in its entirety, with particular attention given to physician orders and the medication administration record (MAR). Resident #204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 8:30 PM. The clinical record revealed physician's orders placed on 12/9/23 for the following medications: Cozaar Oral Tablet 100mg .give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . GlycoLax Powder .give 17 gram by mouth one time a day every 3 days . Omeprazole Oral Capsule Delayed Release 40mg .give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day . Potassium Chloride ER Oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to appropriately label medication with accepted professional principles in 1 of 2 medication carts. The findings included: For medication cart #1, the staff failed to document the date on the label when two multi-use bottles of over the counter medication were opened. On 2/6/2024 at approximately 4:00 p.m., an inspection of the medication cart was conducted after the medication administration observation. The names of the medications were placed on top of the bottle caps but there were no dates of when the bottles were opened. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-F was asked what was missing on the routine stock multi-use bottle of Aspirin 81 milligrams and Multivitamins found in the cart. LPN-F looked at the 2 bottles and stated the date should have been placed on the label when the bottles were opened. When asked why that should happen, LPN-F stated, If you do not label it, you do not know when it was opened. LPN-F stated the nurses placed the names of medications on the caps of the routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices and perform the required reporting of a communicable disease in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Virginia Department of Health guidelines. The findings included: The facility staff failed to report newly confirmed COVID-19 infections to the local health authorities. On 2/6/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Facility Administrator and the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated, Our last COVID outbreak at the facility started on January 21st [2024], we had a resident who was showing symptoms and we tested her for COVID and it came back positive, we began testing everyone right away and found an additional 9 residents who were positive for COVID so that brought our total to 10 positive COVID cases that day. The name and phone number for the facility's contact at the local health department was requested. The IP stated, I have not spoken to anyone at the health department, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free from misappropriation of property for 1 Resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 2 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to prevent the diversion of the resident's narcotic pain medication, Oxycodone 10 mg (milligrams). A review of facility documentation revealed that the facility discovered a discrepancy between 7/8/2023 at 6:00 AM and 7/8/2023 at 12:00 PM, regarding Resident #1's narcotic pain medication, Oxycodone 10 mg IR (Immediate Release). The facility documentation showed that 52 tablets of Oxycodone were documented on 7/8/2023 at 6:00 on the controlled medication utilization record which was the end of the record. A new record was started, and 44 tablets of Oxycodone were documented on 7/8/2023 at 12:00 PM, thus leaving pills unaccounted for. The facility failed to review each controlled medication utilization sheet for accuracy. On 11/20/23 Surveyor B in reviewing the Controlled Medication Utilization sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide medication administration that meets professional standards of care for 1 of 2 medication carts. The findings included: For medication cart B, LPN B (licensed practical nurse-B), failed to administer medications following the facility policy and the accepted professional standard for signing off and administering controlled substances. On 11/20/23 at approximately 10:30 AM, 1 of the 2 medication carts were audited and LPN B was asked the process for shift-to-shift controlled drug count. LPN B stated that while the oncoming shift viewed the medication cards the off going shift would read the control sheet to verify the number of medications matched the sheet. When asked if she could demonstrate she stated that she could. While demonstrating she stated that she had not, Finished signing out her 9:00 AM narcs. While counting the controlled sheets and comparing to the medication cards there were a total of 9 Residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assure the accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications for 1 Resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 2 Residents. The Findings included: For Resident #1 facility staff failed to ensure proper dispensing and accounting of controlled medications. A review of facility documentation revealed that although the facility discovered a discrepancy in the accounting of the narcotic pain medication, Oxycodone, for Resident #1, between 7/8/2023 at 6:00 AM and 7/8/2023 at 12:00 PM, they did not uncover the full extent of the discrepancy. The facility documentation showed that 52 tablets of Oxycodone was documented on 7/8/2023 at 6:00 AM on the controlled medication utilization record (which was the end of the record). A new record was started, and 44 tablets of Oxycodone were documented on 7/8/2023 at 12:00 PM, thus leaving pills unaccounted for. The facility failed to review each controlled medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide routine medications to 4 Residents (#'s 8, 36, 51, and 26) in a Survey sample of 21 Residents. The Findings included: 1. For Resident #8 the facility staff failed to ensure he had an adequate supply of routinely scheduled oxycodone (narcotic pain medication). Resident # 8, a 68 yr. old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to esophageal cancer, anxiety, depression, COPD, malignant neoplasm of supraglottis, cirrhosis of liver, chronic pain related to cancer, and calculus of gallbladder and bile duct (gall stones still present in gall bladder and bile duct) with acute and chronic cholecystitis. The most recent MDS was a Quarterly with an ARD of 4/14/21. Resident #8 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #8 is coded as being independent with most ADL's with the exception of eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to label and date a biological in accordance with currently accepted professional principles which was located in one out of one medication rooms. Specifically, an opened multi-dose vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative was observed undated in the medication room refrigerator on 07/15/2021. On 07/15/2021 at 9:30 A.M., this surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse A (LPN A) observed an opened box of tuberculin purified protein derivative. There were two dates handwritten on the box: 06/21/21 and 07/13/21. Inside the box, an opened vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative was observed. There was a clear solution in the vial and LPN A verified there was no handwritten date or initials observed on the vial. When asked about the meaning of the 2 dates handwritten on the box, LPN A stated I think this date is when we received it referring to 06/21/21 and LPN A stated that the other date [07/13/2021] was when it was opened. When asked about the expectation for labeling after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 3 of 4 food storage areas. The facility staff failed to label and date prepared food items, opened food items and discard foods that had exceeded the use by date in 3 of 4 food storage areas. The findings included: On 7/13/21 at approximately 12 Noon, an inspection was conducted of the kitchen. The Dietary Manager (Employee C), accompanied Surveyor D as observations were made. The following items were observed: 1. The 2 door stand-alone fridge located beside the coffee pot contained a sandwich, tossed garden salad, and 2 cups of fresh fruit. None of these items were labeled or dated to indicate when they were prepared or when they should be used by; nor the contents. 2. In the walk-in cooler a box of sweet potatoes were observed, that were soft to touch, with obvious signs/white spots of decomposition. 3. There was a pan of what appeared to be a soup on the top shelf, which was not labeled or dated, nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 Residents (Resident #2 and Resident #8), in a survey sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident #2 the facility staff failed to document the administration of Byetta insulin as ordered by the physician. The facility staff documented the administration of Bydureon insulin, despite this order being discontinued. 2. For Resident #8 the facility failed to give Oxycodone 20 mg every four hours as ordered by the physician, and failed to document why medications were held. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2 the facility staff failed to document the administration of Byetta insulin as ordered by the physician. The facility staff documented the administration of Bydureon insulin, despite this order being discontinued. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 10/15/20. Diagnosis for Resident #2, included but were not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 Residents (Resident #2 and Resident #8), in a survey sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident #2 the facility staff documented the administration of Bydureon insulin three times after it was discontinued. 2. For Resident # 8 the facility failed to give routinely scheduled Narcotic Pain Medicine as ordered by physician to a Resident with a diagnosis of Cancer and is on comfort care. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2 the facility staff documented the administration of Bydureon insulin three times after it was discontinued. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 10/15/20. Diagnosis for Resident #2, included but were not limited to: hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, sepsis, type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy, and chronic kidney disease stage 3b. Resident #2's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accommodate a resident's food preference for 1 resident (Resident #42) in a survey sample of 21 residents. For Resident #42, the facility staff served a pork chop for lunch service with a documented food preference indicating, No Pork. The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a recent hospital admission and receiving wound care and intravenous antibiotic therapy. Resident #42's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/20/21 was coded as an admission from an acute care hospital. Resident #42 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of possible 15, indicating that Resident #42 was cognitively intact. On 7/14/21, at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident #42 was observed in her room with her lunch tray placed in front of her. Resident #42 stated, They served me a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program. On 7/13/21 approximately 1:00 PM during initial tour of the facility it was noted that there were small flies or gnats in room [ROOM NUMBER], in the kitchen area, and surveyors also killed 2 or 3 of them in the conference room on 7/13/20. The gnats were seen several times over the 3 days on survey. The Administrator was made aware of the issue on 7/13/21 during the end of day conference and a request to see the pest control log was made. On 7/14/21 at 10:00 AM the pest control logs were reviewed and excerpts are as follows: 7-6-21-The pest Control Company notes the facility is on the Cockroach/ rodent program, large fly program and the ant program. Sanitation issues: location: Kitchen area interior Open since: 5/12/21 Findings: Excess water noted in the drain action needed keep area dry. 6/2/21: Sanitation issues: location: Kitchen area interior Open since: 5/12/21 Findings: Excess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the following: 1) There was expired milk in the refrigerator 2) The food in the 'walk-in' fridge and 'walk-in' freezer was not shelved to allow air circulation 3) The internal temperatures for the 'reach-in' fridge, the 'walk-in' fridge, and the 'walk-in' freezer were not being monitored 4) Coffee and milk temperatures were not being monitored 5) There was half-melted ice cream and popsicles in the pantry freezer 6) Handwashing by kitchen staff was not performed according to guidelines The findings include: On 10/30/2018 at 11:30 AM, it was observed the outside temperature reading for the reach-in refrigerator was 39 degrees Fahrenheit. When asked about the internal temperature reading, Employee E looked at the thermometer, tapped it, and stated it was not working. On 10/30/2018 at 11:35 AM, Employee E and surveyor entered the walk-in refrigerator. The outside temperature reading was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights were implemented for one of 26 residents. (Resident #14) For Resident #14 the facility failed to assist in obtaining a Responsible Party or Power of Attorney for a resident with Dementia and severe cognitive impairment. The findings included: Resident # 14 an [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Cognitive Communication Deficits, adult failure to thrive, and muscle weakness. The Resident's most recent (Minimum Data Set) MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/11/2018 coded Resident as having a (Brief Interview of mental status) BIMS score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. According to MDS information Resident #14 has been in the facility since May of 2017 with a BIMS of 99 with no POA or Guardian Ad Litem. Prior to 2017 MDS data showed that the Resident had a BIMS of 15 indicating no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to determine if it was safe for Resident to self-administer Afrin Nasal Spray for one Resident (Resident #1 ) in a sample of 26 residents. The findings include: Resident #1, an [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety, and dementia. The Resident was admitted to skilled care recovering from a motor vehicle accident where she sustained a left radial/ulnar fracture and chest bruising. On 10/30/2018 at 4:10 PM, the Resident was not in her room but a container of unsealed Afrin nasal spray was observed on Resident's tray table at the bedside. On 10/31/2018 at 8:40 AM, the Resident was observed in bed, fully dressed, and she just finished eating her breakfast. The Afrin nasal spray was observed next to her food tray and when the Resident was asked about it, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure that a PASARR Screening was done for 1 Resident (#14) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. For Resident #14 the facility failed to ensure PASARR Screening obtained prior to admission. The findings include: Resident #14 an [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Cognitive Communication Deficits, adult failure to thrive, and muscle weakness. Resident most recent (Minimum Data Set) MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/11/2018 coded Resident as having a (Brief Interview of mental status) BIMS score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 10/29/2018 during clinical record review it was discovered that the PASARR screening was not done prior to admission nor during the time since admission. On 10/30/2018 during end of day conference Administrator notified that Resident #14 had no PASARR. He stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, family interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that is Resident Centered for 1 Resident (#102) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. For Resident #102 the facility failed to address total knee replacement surgical care, hip pin removal, and discharge planning in the comprehensive care plan. The Findings Include: Resident #102 an [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Osteoporosis, Hypertension, Diabetes, chronic kidney disease and acute kidney failure. Resident #102 was a new admission and therefore did not have an MDS (Minimum Data Set). On 10/29/2018 the resident observed in bed with Knee Immobilizer in place to Left knee. On 10/30/2018 at 2:30 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #102 and Family members that were visiting. The Resident stated that she went to the hospital for a total knee replacement. Family member stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and during a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to follow the professional standards of nursing for 1 Resident (Resident #11) in the survey sample of 26 residents. For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to obtain finger stick blood sugar parameters. The Findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11's diagnoses included; Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, high cholesterol, anemia, and chronic kidney disease resulting in hemodialysis, The most recent Minimum Data Set for Resident #11, was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 8-9-18. This MDS coded Resident #11 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Resident was also coded as requiring only supervision, and some physical assistance from 1 staff person for Activities of daily living such as transferring, hygiene, dressing, and bathing. The Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to apply hand splints for one Resident, (Resident #30) in a sample of 26 residents. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to provide hand splints as ordered by the physician. The findings included; Resident #30, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include cerebrovascular disease, respiratory failure, hemiplegia, contractures, dysphagia, and diabetes. Resident #30 is in a vegetative state on hospice care with a tracheostomy, oxygen therapy, gastrostomy tube, and enteral feedings. Resident #30's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/17/2018 was coded as a quarterly review. The Brief Interview of Mental Status was not completed but cognitive skills for daily decision-making was coded as severely impaired. The MDS quarterly review also indicated Resident #30 received passive range of motion and had a splint or brace applied. On 10/30/18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure that 1 Resident (#36) was free from accident/hazard in a survey sample of 26 Residents. For Resident #36 the facility failed to ensure that Resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidental rolling off of bed. The findings included; Resident # 36 a [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypoglycemia, Bradycardia Alzheimer's Disease, Transient Ischemic Attack (Stroke), Major depressive disorder and muscle weakness. The most current MDS (Minimum Data Set) prior to fall was coded as a Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/10/2018. Her MDS coded the Resident as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS of 99 indicating the resident has severe cognitive impairment. Her MDS also coded her under Functional Status Section G - #4 Total Dependence- Requiring Full staff participation and coded her as a # 3 for Support- Two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff Interview, and clinical Record Review, the facility staff failed to ensure expired medications were not available for use, for one resident (Resident #32) out of 26 residents in the survey sample. The medication cart had two opened vials of Lantus that were past the expiration date. In addition, a vial of Pneumovax was not dated upon opening. The findings include: On 10/31/18 at 3:11 PM, The medication carts were checked for expired medication. Lantus for Resident #32 was opened on 10-1-18 and another was opened on 9-29-18, however, both vials were still in use. The stickers on bottles read to discard 28 days after opening. Review of the medication refrigerator revealed one vial of Pneumovax had been opened and was not dated. On 10/31/18 at 4:08 PM, the staff development nurse brought in a form from the pharmacy in which showed a vial of Pneumovax was sent to the facility on 1-30-18. The staff development was asked about what the standard of nursing when opening a new vial was: They are supposed to date it upon opening. When asked about the vials of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
REGENCY HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHESAPEAKE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EK 2005 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LL 2013 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MZR EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SILVERSTONE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
BROWN, JUSTINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/12/2023
RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 22%Other / private 14%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$422per resident / day
operating cost
$12,824per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$428per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495189. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next