Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation Center
505 West Rio Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (434) 978-7015 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.1% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.2% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.5% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.6% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 73.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.2% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 283 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.4%CMS range 46.6–59.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 6.7–11.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 77.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.1–9.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were met regarding showers for one of two units (unit one), which did not provide showers due to low weekend staffing. The findings include:Review of the facilities PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) indicated weekend staffing excessively low for the January through March 2025 quarter.Review of the as worked weekend scheduled for March 2025 revealed on March 8th and 9th (Saturday and Sunday) that there were two certified nursing assistants scheduled on unit one for 7 a.m. through 7 p.m. Review of the resident census log for these dates indicated a census of 59 residents on unit one.On 9/2/25 at 2:30 the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding scheduling nursing staff. The DON verbalized not having a staff coordinator at the present time, but that typically there are four to five certified nurse assistants (CNA's) on unit one on both day/evening shift and evening/night shift. On 9/3/25 at 4:20 p.m. CNA #1 (aide that worked the weekend in question) was interviewed. CNA #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that unnecessary psychotropic medications were not administered to one resident, Resident #5 (R5) out of a survey sample of six residents. The findings included:Staff completed the admission medication reconciliation using the resident's at-home medications rather than the physician-verified hospital discharge orders, resulting in the administration of two antipsychotic medications, Amitriptyline 10 mg at bedtime and Trazodone 100 mg at bedtime, that were not prescribed upon discharge. This failure placed R5 at risk for chemical restraint related to receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications.Unable to conduct an interview with R5 due to R5 was no longer a resident at the facility.On 9/3/25 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, unit two manager, LPN#2 (LPN2). LPN2 stated that the discharge summary from the hospital was used for the admission orders. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing in accordance with the facility assessment on one of two units (unit one), which had excessively low weekend staff. The findings include: Review of the facilities PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) indicated weekend staffing excessively low for the January through March 2025 quarter. Review of the as worked weekend scheduled for March 2025 revealed on March 8th and 9th (Saturday and Sunday), there were two certified nursing assistants scheduled on unit one for 7 a.m. through 7 p.m. Review of the resident census log for these dates documented a census of 59 residents on unit one. On 9/2/25 at 2:30 the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding scheduling adequate nursing staff. The DON verbalized not having a staff coordinator at the present time and was currently taking on that role, but typically there are four to five certified nurse assistants (CNA's) on unit one on both day/evening shift and evening/night shift (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and 7:00p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge for one of six residents, resident #6.The findings include:The facility did not set up home health therapy per discharge instructions for Resident #6 (R6).Diagnoses for R6 included spinal stenosis, diabetes, sepsis upon admission, scoliosis, status post spinal fusion. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) was a 5-day assessment dated [DATE], R6 was assessed with a cognitive score was 10, indicating moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R6's clinical record indicated R6 was admitted to the facility due to status post-surgery for spinal fusion and was at the facility for skilled services requiring therapy.Review of R6's discharge instructions indicated R6 was scheduled to discharge home on 3/13/25 and receive home health services for therapy (physical and occupational). The record did not indicate that the facility initiated home health services. The discharge instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one resident, Resident #5 (R5) out of a survey sample of six residents. The findings included:The facility staff did not follow the physician discharge orders for R5's admission to the facility.On 9/3/25 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, unit two manager, LPN#2 (LPN2). LPN2 stated that the discharge summary from the hospital was used for the admission orders. She stated the discharge medications on the summary was used and not the at home medications. She stated that if the orders were unclear that the hospital or the doctor was contacted for clarification. LPN3 stated that when pharmacy alerts come up with medication orders that it was discussed with the doctor. She said, I would hope the nurses would document the alerts.On 9-3-25 at 10:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN#3 (LPN3). LPN3 stated that the facility follows the hospital's discharge summary for medication orders. He explained that if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure medication review was performed by physician services on admission for one resident, Resident #5 (R5) out of a survey sample of six residents. The findings included: On 9/3/25, a clinical record review of Resident #5 was conducted. The review showed the residents did not have a diagnosis of depression or delirium on the diagnosis list; however, amitriptyline was documented for depression without a corresponding diagnosis. A nurse practitioner's progress notes dated 8/11/25 and 8/13/25 documented the son's request for the antipsychotic medications (amitriptyline, trazodone and Seroquel) to be discontinued. The nurse practitioner stated it was her intent to discontinue the medications, but she did not complete the discontinuation. The medications were ordered on admission, 8/4/25 and continued until R5 was discharged on 8/15/25.On 9/4/25 at 9:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, LPN#1 (LPN1). LPN1 stated she reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate record for two of six residents. The findings include: 2. The facility staff failed to complete R5's admission medications correctly and had a diagnosis of depression and R5 had no history of depression. On 9/3/25 at 1:41 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with the nurse practitioner (NP). The NP stated she saw the resident on 8/11/25 with some confusion and again on 8/13/25 with less confusion. She reported that two other providers also noted improvement in his confusion. She stated she only heard the concern once about the son wanting the antipsychotic medications discontinued. She explained that it was her intent to discontinue the medication, but she did not do so. On 9/3/25, a clinical record review of Resident #5 was conducted. The review showed the residents did not have a diagnosis of depression or delirium on the diagnosis list; however, amitriptyline was documented for depression without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the menu for both meals observed, affecting multiple residents, including Resident #2-R2, Resident #3 - R3, Resident #4 -R4, and Resident #5-R5, who resided on two of two nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to prepare and serve foods in accordance with the posted menu. On 3/18/25, the daily menu was observed to be posted on each of the nursing units and outside the main dining room. The menu indicated breakfast included: scrambled eggs, sausage patty, cranberry muffin, orange juice, hot coffee or tea, and assorted milk options. On 3/18/25, at approximately 8:00 a.m., observations were conducted on each of the units. Residents were noted to be served sausage patty, scrambled eggs, toast, and oatmeal. Residents were also noted to be eating breakfast with no beverages on their tray. A certified nursing assistant was observed taking a beverage cart down the hallway and serving residents beverages which consisted of one cup of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences affecting multiple residents on two of two units. The findings included: 1. For residents on each of the two units, the facility staff failed to provide milk and other liquids in a quantity sufficient to maintain hydration. On 3/18/25, the daily menu was observed to be posted on each of the nursing units and outside the main dining room. The menu indicated breakfast included: scrambled eggs, sausage patty, cranberry muffin, orange juice, hot coffee or tea, and assorted milk options. On 3/18/25 at approximately 8:00 a.m., observations were conducted on each of the units. Residents were noted to be served sausage patty, scrambled eggs, toast and oatmeal. Residents were also noted to be eating breakfast with no beverages on their tray. A certified nursing assistant was observed taking a beverage cart down the hallway and serving residents beverages which consisted of one cup of coffee or a cup of juice for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the menu for both meals observed, affecting multiple residents who resided on two of two nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to prepare and serve foods in accordance with physician ordered therapeutic diets affecting seventeen residents. On 3/18/25 at 10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the registered dietician (RD). The RD reported he is at the facility once or twice weekly. The RD confirmed that a lot of the residents had expressed concerns about the diabetic diets, and he had met with the residents recently. The RD explained that the facility doesn't prepare different foods for diabetics, they do a carbohydrate-controlled diet, and said, every meal should get the same amount of carbs, it is less carbs than the regular diet and less calories. The RD went on to explain that the diabetic diets are controlled through portions and sometimes a substitution, such as a roll or pasta dish may be substituted for another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain essential equipment in safe, operating condition the main kitchen. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen's walk-in freezer in operating condition. On 3/18/25 at approximately 4 p.m., during observations of the kitchen, it was noted that the freezer door was damaged and did not close completely. When the freezer door was opened, a significant amount of ice buildup was observed around the door jamb, which extended about 4 inches up the door frame. The food packages closest to the door had a buildup of frost. The gasket on the door was not attached at the bottom, about 12 inches of the gasket moved when the door was opened. On the back wall of the freezer was frozen streams of ice and the rear floor was incapsulated with ice build-up that covered the back 1/3 of the walk-in freezer floor. The ice incapsulated a milk crate that was sitting in the floor. On 3/18/25 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with the cook (other employee #4-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to provide meals in accordance with resident preference for 2 residents (Resident #2 - R2 and Resident #10 - R10) out of a survey sample of 8 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to serve R2's choice of an entree and a lidded cup with the lunch time meal. On 3/18/25 at 12:15 p.m. an observation was made of R2's lunch meal. R2's meal ticket read that a baked pork chop was the entree requested, but it was observed that she received the flat baked ham and no lidded cup for R2's beverage was observed on her meal tray. On 3/18/25 at 12:30 p.m. an interview was conducted with R2. R2 said, I usually get a pork chop and not ham. R2 stated that she liked a lidded cup but was never given a lid on the cup with meals. On 3/18/25 at 2:00 p.m. a review of the clinical record was conducted. R2's care plan was reviewed and documented that R2 preferred lidded cups with meals. On 3/18/25 at 4:00 p.m. a review of resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a change in condition for one of four residents in the survey sample, (Residents #3). Resident #3's (R3) responsible party was not notified of a fall with injury. This was a closed record review. The findings include: According to the clinical record, diagnoses for R3 included; Encephalopathy, fractured right pubis, dementia, pneumonia, and aseptic necrosis of the left femur. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/22/23. R3 was assessed with a cognitive score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely cognitively impaired. On 12/3/24 R3's clinical record was reviewed regarding a fall incident occurring on 11/12/23. The note indicated R3 got up out of wheelchair with right leg still crossed behind left foot. Before the nurse could catch R3, R3 landed on knees and obtained a skin tear to the left elbow. Review of the SBAR (Situation Background Appearance Review) notification section; it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility record review, the facility staff failed to have a surety bond to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility, which affected 72 residents who had funds deposited with the facility. The findings included: On 7/10/24 the facility staff provided a surety bond which was in the amount of $165,000. On 7/10/24, a review of the resident trust accounts revealed that there were 72 residents with funds deposited at the facility. The total balance was $180,783.50. The surety bond did not have sufficient coverage to cover the funds deposited with the facility. On 7/10/24, during an end of day meeting, the facility administrator was made aware of the above findings. Following the end of day meeting, the administrator came to the conference room and a list of residents that she said the business office said they needed to close the accounts for. The surveyor then went to the business office manager's (BOM) office. The BOM said she had just started at the facility and had identified several accounts that need to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain sufficient nurse staffing to assure resident safety and highest practicable well-being of each resident, to meet their daily needs in accordance with the facility assessment, for 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: On 7/8/24, during initial tour of the facility and interviews with the residents, numerous residents expressed concerns about the facility staffing. The residents reported having to wait long periods of time, that they described as over an hour, for call bell responses. On 7/8/24 at 2:20 p.m., the Ombudsman met with the survey team. The Ombudsman reported, staffing is horrible. I think it is dangerous. Especially on weekends, people feel like they can just call out, it is like a revolving door. I worry, they don't have an intercom system, if they put their call light on, it is on for an hour. If someone has fallen, this is dangerous. On 7/8/24 at 3:07 p.m., a group meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food accordance with professional standards for food safety in the main kitchen, which has the potential to affect multiple residents on 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to store food at an appropriate temperature in the walk-in refrigerator. On 7/8/24 at 11 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with a dietary aide and cook (other employee #11- OE11), in the absence of the dietary manager. On 7/8/24 at 11 a.m., upon entry into the walk-in cooler, it was noted that the temperature did not feel cool enough to ensure food safety. The internal thermometer located within the fridge was observed to be reading 55 degrees Fahrenheit. OE11 was asked about the cooler, and he reported, It feels cold enough to me. When asked about the temperature readings and records, OE11 said, maintenance checks that, and said the logs should be hanging on the wall. There were no temperature logs available for any of the food storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and determine if a Resident was safe to self-administer medications that were at the bedside, for one Resident (Resident #28) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #28 (R28), who had multiple medications stored on the over bed table and bedside table, in their room, the facility staff failed to assess if the resident was safe to self-administer medications. On 7/8/24 at 12:42 p.m., observations were conducted in R28's room and an interview with R28 was conducted. During the interview, it was observed that R28 had prescription nasal spray which was Ipratropium Bromide and had a pharmacy label with an RX # and date of 4/16/24. Also at the bedside was sterile eye drops and a toothache cream on the over bed table which was positioned at the bedside. When asked, R28 said she is supposed to use the nasal spray 3 times a day, but most days only uses it twice. R28 also said, she uses the eye drops…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide advance written notice of a room change for one of twenty-six residents in the survey sample (Resident #77). The findings include: Resident #77 (R77) nor R77's responsible party were provided a written notice prior to a room change. R77 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, deep vein thrombosis, insomnia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, cancer, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R77 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 7/8/24 at 2:30 p.m., R77's family member (other #7) was interviewed. R77's family member stated the facility moved the resident to a different room on 7/1/24 and that there had been no advance notice of the room change. The family member stated she was not aware of any written notice provided about the room change. R77's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to obtain and incorporate the recommendations from a level II PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) into the Resident's assessment and care plan for one Resident (Resident #46) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #46 (R46), who had a level II PASARR, the facility staff were unaware until requested by the survey team, that the Resident had a level II screening and failed to incorporate the recommendations into the Resident's assessment and care planning. On 7/8/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R46's electronic health record. The census tab of the clinical record revealed R46 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R46 did have several hospitalizations and the most recent readmission was on 10/7/23. R46's diagnosis included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents receive devices to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #28- R28), in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included, For R28, who had a recent fall, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident had fall interventions in place to prevent further accidents. On 07/08/24 at 1:19 p.m., an interview was conducted with R28. R28 reported that she has had several falls while at the facility. When asked what interventions were put in place to prevent future falls, the resident said she didn't know. Observations revealed no fall mat within the room. On 7/8/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R28's chart. According to the Post Fall Investigation document in the assessment tab of the chart, it indicated that R28's most recent fall was on 6/16/24. There were also Post Fall Investigation assessments completed on 12/15/23, 10/26/23, 9/19/23, 9/18/23, and 9/14/23. According to the care plan R28 had a focus area initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care, services, and failed to appropriately store respiratory equipment, in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #84 and Resident #28) in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician order prior to administering oxygen to Resident #84 (R84) and failed to label the oxygen tubing with the date. According to the clinical record, R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to congestive heart failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region - Stage 3, pressure ulcer of the right buttocks - Stage 3, and cutaneous abscess of back. R84's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/18/24 coded R84 with no cognitive impairment with daily decision making.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure prn (as needed) orders for psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days, affecting 1 resident (Resident #82- R82), in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included: For R82, the facility staff failed to ensure that a prn order for lorazepam was limited to 14 days. On 7/8/24 at 2:33 p.m., R82 was visited in her room. R82 was able to communicate with the surveyor but confusion was evident. R82 appeared calm and not anxious during the interview. On 7/8/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R82's chart. This review included a review of the physician orders, progress notes and medication administration records (MARs). It was noted that R82 had a physician order dated 5/1/24, that read, Lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg/ml (Lorazepam) give 1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed of end-of-life anxiety. The order had no end date and remained an active and current order. According to the MAR, R82 received the lorazepam on 5/3/24, 6/30/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide meal substitutions in accordance with resident preferences for one resident (Resident #32- R32), in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included: On 7/8/24 at approximately 12:30 p.m., R32 was observed being served her lunch meal in the dining room by a dietary aide, (Other Employee #9-OE9). R32 asked OE9 for a grilled cheese sandwich and OE9 was heard to say to the resident, That's what you ordered, and walked away. A few minutes later OE9 served another resident their plate and as OE9 walked by R32, R32 again asked for a grilled cheese sandwich. OE9 told R32 again, That's what you ordered, it's not pork. When the surveyor then walked over to R32, OE9 said to the the surveyor, That's what she ordered. R32 then said to the surveyor, I don't want that. I want a grilled cheese sandwich. On 7/8/24 at 12:45 p.m., R32 was observed in the dining room, eating a cold turkey and cheese sandwich. When asked about the sandwich, R32 said, It wasn't what I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet in accordance with physician orders for one resident (Resident #82- R82) in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included: For R82, who had a physician order for nectar thickened liquids (NTL), the facility staff failed to provide thickened liquids. On 7/8/24 at approximately 12:30 p.m., observations were conducted of R82 during the lunch meal. R82 was served a beverage with her lunch meal that was an amber color, which appeared to be apple juice. There was ice in the cup, and it was noted to be a thin consistency. R82 also had a water pitcher that when picked up you could tell there was a liquid with ice that was able to be swirled around in the pitcher. According to the meal ticket that was on the lunch tray, R82 was noted to have been on NTL. On 7/8/24 at 12:47 p.m., LPN #6 accompanied the surveyor to the room of R82. LPN #6 confirmed that the resident was served thin liquids, and she opened the water pitcher and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate clinical record for one of twenty-six residents in the survey sample (Resident #77). The findings include: Resident #77's clinical record did not include recent hospice notes/documentation. Resident #77 (R77) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, deep vein thrombosis, insomnia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, cancer, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R77 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. R77's clinical record documented the resident had been receiving hospice care/services since 1/19/24. R77's clinical record documented no hospice notes or record of provided hospice services since mid-April 2024. On 7/10/24 at 8:35 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed about R77's hospice notes. The DON stated hospice was required to provide notes after visits and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices for one of 26 residents. The findings include: For Resident #84 (R84), who was on enhanced barrier precautions, the facility staff failed to wear PPE (personal protective equipment) while providing direct care. According to the clinical record, R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R84 included but are not limited to pressure ulcer of sacral region - Stage 3, pressure ulcer of the right buttocks - Stage 3, and cutaneous abscess of back. R84's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/18/24 coded R84 with no cognitive impairment with daily decision making. On 7/9/24 at 8:15 a.m. a tour of unit one was conducted. During the tour, R84 observed residing in the A bed, which was closest to the door. The room had a sign outside the room, above the resident's name that indicated enhanced barrier precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure CNA's (certified nursing assistant) received 12 hours of in-service training per year for one CNA (CNA #8), in a survey sample of two CNA's reviewed. The findings included: For CNA #8, the facility staff failed to ensure that a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training per year was provided. On 7/9/24, a sample of two CNA's was selected for review of annual education. CNA #8, who was hired 8/30/22, was selected for review. The facility administrator was asked to provide all of CNA #8's training from 8/30/22-8/30/23, for review. Review of the Relias Official Transcript provided, revealed CNA #8 only had 4.75 hours of training during the timeframe reviewed, none of which included dementia management or care of the cognitively impaired. Also provided was the transcript for CNA #8 for 2024, which included 1.5 hours of training, which consisted of: HIPAA (privacy and confidentiality), Infection Control and Bloodborne Pathogens. According to the facility assessment, in part 2 titled, Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow posted menus for six of ten residents in the survey sample (Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #10). The findings include: Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #10 were not served food items as listed on the posted menu and/or meal tickets. On 4/8/24 at 2:20 p.m., the resident council president (Resident #5) was interviewed about meals/food service in the facility. The council president stated that foods served rarely matched the posted menus or meal tickets. The council president stated concerns with food had been discussed in council meetings for several months and dietary staff reported they were working to improve. The posted breakfast menu for 4/9/24 included scrambled eggs, bran muffin, oatmeal, whole milk, orange juice with alternates listed as hard-boiled eggs, wheat toast, and assorted cold cereals in addition to coffee or hot tea. On 4/9/24 at 8:30 a.m., meals served to Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #10 were observed and compared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature on one of two units (unit 1). The findings include: On 4/8/24 at 2:50 p.m., the resident council president, Resident #5 (R5), was interviewed about food/meals in the facility. R5 stated meals served to residents in rooms were usually cold. R5 stated issues with cold food and missing food items had been discussed multiple times in the council meetings and dietary staff reported they were working to improve. With the council president's permission, the resident council meeting minutes were reviewed from January, February and March (2024). Minutes documented residents expressed concerns that the overall appearance/taste of food needed improvement and foods were not served hot. The posted menu for 4/9/24 lunch included spaghetti with meatballs, Italian mixed vegetables, garlic bread, chocolate chip cookie, whole milk, coffee and tea. The alternate menu included grilled marinated chicken breast, whole kernel corn, mashed potatoes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of changes in medications for one of ten residents in the survey sample (Resident #7). The findings include: Resident #7 (R7) had multiple medication changes with no notification to R7's family/responsible party. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hip fracture, Alzheimer's, traumatic brain dysfunction, hypothyroidism, anemia, osteoporosis, anxiety, depression, seizures, and protein-calorie malnutrition. The minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool) dated 5/23/23 assessed R7 with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R7's clinical record documented physician ordered medication and/or medication dose changes as follows: 5/18/23 Celexa increased from 10 mg (milligrams) per day to 20 mg per day for treatment of depression. 5/26/23 Celexa was discontinued and the antidepressant Zoloft 75 mg per day was started. 6/03/23 Antibiotic cephalexin 500 mg every 12 hours for 7 days for treatment of a leg abrasion with cellulitis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a resident centered care plan for one of 4 resident's. Resident #1 (R1) did not have resident specific interventions for nutrition, vision, activities of daily living (ADL's), and bowel incontinence. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included; irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), lactose intolerant, chronic diarrhea, and retinopathy with macular edema. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/14/23. R1 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 12/4/23 at 11:20 AM, R1 verbalized that he could only see the outline of a person and shapes, but was able to get to the bathroom by counting steps and feeling the wall. R1 went on to say that he is lactose intolerant and that foods cooked with milk upsets his stomach, requiring the immediate use of the bathroom. R1 verbalized that if the urge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide meals to accommodate food allergies/intolerance for one of 4 resident's. Resident #1 (R1) was served food that exacerbated his medical condition. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), lactose intolerant, chronic diarrhea, and retinopathy with macular edema. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/14/23, which assessed R1 with a cognitive score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 12/4/23 at 11:20 AM, R1 verbalized that he is lactose intolerant but is served food containing milk, which upsets his stomach and results in needing to use the bathroom right away. R1 verbalized that the aides will serve his food but don't say what the meal is or where the items are on the tray. R1 said that because of the inability to see, he eats what he is served, but that if he knew what was on the tray, then he would be able to make a choice if the food would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview the facility staff failed to follow physicians orders for the administration of the correct formulation of a multi-vitamin for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 9. Resident # 9 was ordered Men's Daily Health Formula and instead was administered a regular multi-vitamin for a period of five months. Findings include: Resident # 9 was admitted to the facility 6/1/21. Diagnoses for Resident # 9 included, but were not limited to: Malignant neoplasm of the rectum and pancreas, diabetes, depression, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] with the resident being scored with moderate impairment in cognition with a score of 11 out of 15. On 11/8/21 a medication pass and pour observation was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) # 1 beginning at 7:55 a.m. Medications administered to Resident # 9 were then reconciled against physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practice during a medication pass observation on one of two units. Thirteen oral medications were touched by the nurse's bare hands/fingers prior to administering them to residents during a medication pass on unit two. The findings include: On 11/8/21 at 7:37 a.m., a medication pass observation was conducted on unit two with registered nurse (RN) # 1 administering oral medications to Resident #23. During this observation, RN #1 touched and/or handled each of seven medication tablets with her bare hands and/or fingers prior to administering them to the resident. RN #1 popped six of the seven tablets from the medication supply cards into her bare hand prior to placing them in a cup. RN #1 reached her index finger into the supply bottle and retrieved an aspirin tablet before placing in the medication cup. Tablet medications touched then administered to Resident #23 included vitamin D, ferrous sulfate, aspirin, Fenofibrate, lisinopril,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 22 in the survey sample, Resident #289. Resident #289's baseline care plan failed to include a problems/focus area, goals and interventions for the anticoagulant medication, Apixaban. The findings include: Resident #289 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism, history of COVID 19, respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypercholesteromia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and long term use of anticoagulants. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #289 as alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation, having intact cognition and with the ability to express ideas/wants. On 11/08/2021 at 2:13 p.m., Resident #289 was interviewed regarding the quality of care since admission to the facility. Resident #289 stated she was admitted after a hospital stay due to testing positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 22 in the survey sample, Resident #60. Resident #60's comprehensive care plan did not include a problem/focus area with goals and interventions for the use the anticoagulant medication, Heparin Sodium Solution. The findings include: Resident #60 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia, depression, acute embolism and thrombosis of left popliteal vein, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, difficulty walking and orthopedic aftercare. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #60 as alert and oriented to person, place and situation, having intact cognition and the ability to express wants/ideas. On 11/09/2021, Resident #60's clinical record was reviewed. Observed on the order summary report was the following: Heparin Sodium (Porcine) [an anticoagulant] Solution 5000 Unit/ML Inject 1 ml…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform a pressure ulcer dressing change in a manner to prevent infection for one of twenty-two residents in the survey sample, Resident #33. A nurse failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during dressing changes to Resident #33's pressure ulcers. The findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #33 included atherosclerotic heart disease, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, benign prostatic hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, depression, dysphagia, urinary tract infection and congestive heart failure. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #33 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #33's clinical record documented the resident had three stage 3 pressure ulcers on his buttocks. A consultant wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement use of safety devices for one of twenty-two residents in the survey sample, Resident #36. Resident #36 was observed in a wheelchair without anti-rollback devices as required in his plan of care for fall/injury prevention. The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction with right side hemiplegia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, vascular dementia, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder and urinary tract infection. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #36 with short and long-term memory loss and moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 11/8/21 at 9:09 a.m., Resident #36 was observed seated in his wheelchair, self-propelling about in his room. No anti-rollback devices were installed or in use on the wheelchair. Resident #36 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure two of 23 residents were free from unnecessary medications. Residents #13 and #73 had physician orders for as needed (prn) psychotropic medications in place for greater than 14 days. These as needed prescriptions were continued beyond the 14-day limit without a specified duration. 1. Resident #13 had a physician's order for prn (as needed) Lorazepam in place greater than 14 days. This prescription was continued without a specified duration. 2. Resident #73 was prescribed Ativan (psychotropic medication) on an as needed basis for longer that 14 days without thorough justification. The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, intracranial abscess, gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, heart failure, kidney failure, depression, anxiety disorder and osteoarthritis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #13 as cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed for one of 23 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 145), to ensure a PASARR, used to screen for a mental disorder or intellectual disability, was completed prior to the resident's admission to the facility. Resident # 145 was admitted to the facility without a PASARR, which prevented the facility from knowing if the resident required specialized treatment or services to address a mental disorder or intellectual disability. The findings were: Resident # 145 was admitted to the facility from his home on 2/5/19 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Vitamin D deficiency, and chronic kidney disease. At the time of the survey, the resident's admission Minimum Data Set was not yet completed. On the date of admission, 2/5/19, the resident received the following medication order: Prozac Capsule 40 mg. (milligrams). Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day related to Major Depressive Disorder. (NOTE: Prozac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 23 residents, Resident #344. Resident #344's baseline care plan failed to include any problems, goals, and/or interventions for ADL assistance (activities of daily living) and dietary instructions. The findings include: Resident #344 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, change in bowel habit, vitamin deficiency, unspecified joint pain, seizures, constipation, acute embolism and thrombosis of veins - lower extremities, and atrial fibrillation. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #344 as alert and oriented to person. This assessment documented the resident as incontinent of bowels and bladder, total dependence with one person physical assist for toileting. The assessment documented the resident requiring extensive assistance, with one personal physical assist for eating. Resident #344's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed for two of 23 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 23 and 46), to develop a plan of care that encompassed the resident's total care needs. 1. For Resident # 46, the facility failed to develop a plan of care that addressed the resident's whirlpool treatments for localized edema, and for the refusal of the treatments; and, failed to develop a plan of care to address the resident's use of psychotropic medications. 2. Resident #23 had no care plan developed regarding tooth pain and difficulty chewing due to broken teeth. The findings were: 1.a. Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, difficulty walking, chronic kidney disease, generalized muscle weakness, urge incontinence, dermatitis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 23, Resident #65. Resident #65's care plan was not revised to reflect interventions for skin integrity. The Findings Include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #65 included: Subdural hemorrhage, hemiplegia affecting the right side, muscle weakness, and schizoaffective disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/25/19. Resident #65 had a cognitive score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. On 02/12/19 at 1:48 PM, Resident #65 was interviewed. Resident #65 verbalized he prefered to spend most the day in bed but would like to get out of bed for short periods of time during the day. During the interview Resident #65 was observed laying in bed without any heel protectors. On 2/13/19 Resident #65's medical record was reviewed. A physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and implement interventions to maintain and/or improve the ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) for one of 23 residents in the survey sample. Resident #196, with no restricted activities, remained in bed for one week following a re-admission to the facility after a hospitalization. Staff reported they were waiting for a therapy assessment before getting the resident out of bed. There was no assessment by any discipline during the week following the re-admission regarding the resident's transfer and mobility needs. The findings include: Resident #196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #196 included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, respiratory failure, obesity, urinary retention and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident#196 as cognitively intact. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one of 23 residents in the survey sample. A dose of the medication Neurontin was not administered to Resident #82 as prescribed by the physician. The findings include: Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #82 included urinary tract infection, history of sepsis, pyelonephritis, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, restless leg syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #82 as cognitively intact. Resident #82 was interviewed on 2/13/19 at 8:25 a.m. about quality of life/care in the facility. Resident #82 stated that at times she got her medications late. The resident stated as recent as last week she missed a dose of Neurontin because the nurse did not administer it on time. Resident #82 stated she was due a dose of Neurontin each night at midnight.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for treatment and care of skin integrity for two of 23 resident's, Resident #65 and Resident #196. 1. Resident #65 did not have physician ordered heel protectors (prevlon boots) on while in bed. 2. Resident #196 developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer on her left upper buttock after remaining in bed for one week following a re-admission and without application of a specialized mattress as required in her plan of care for pressure ulcer prevention. The Findings Include: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the the facility on 12/28/18. Diagnoses for Resident #65 included: Subdural hemorrhage, hemiplegia affecting the right side, muscle weakness, and schizoaffective disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/25/19. Resident #65 had a cognitive score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. On 02/12/19 at 1:48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure safety interventions were in place to help prevent accidents and injury for one of 23 residents , Resident #16. Resident #16 was not moved closer to the nurses station as indicated in the Resident's care plan intervention for falls. The Findings Include: Resident #16 was admitted to the the facility on 11/12/18. Diagnoses for Resident #16 included: COPD, Major depression, , anxiety, hypoxemia, bilateral knee replacements. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/19/18. Resident #16 had a cognitive score of 14 indicating cognitively intact. On 02/13/19 at 9:01 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #16. During the interview Resident #16 mentioned she has had a couple of falls recently but without injuries. Resident #16 verbalized a walker was used for mobilization and that she gets up without assistance. Resident #16 was also observed with a wandergaurd in place. On 2/13/19 Resident #16's care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide dental services for two of 23 residents in the survey sample. Resident #23 was not provided dental services regarding assessed broken, painful teeth that caused chewing difficulty. Resident #82 was not provided services to replace two dislodged dental crowns. The findings include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #23 included epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, cervical disc disorder, insomnia, neurogenic bladder, high blood pressure, hemiplegia, depression, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #23 as cognitively intact. On 2/13/19 at 1:08 p.m., Resident #23 stated he had been asking to see a dentist for about 3 months because of some broken teeth that were making it difficult to chew. Resident #23 stated his teeth hurt at times and they were now cutting his meats into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-02-14 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure notification in writing to the state ombudsman office of a transfer for one of 23 residents in the survey sample. A written notification of Resident #195's transfer to the hospital was not sent a representative of the state ombudsman office. In addition, facility staff reported no discharges and/or transfers in the facility were reported in writing to the ombudsman office unless a resident left against medical advice. The findings include: Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on 7/2/18. Diagnoses for Resident #195 included acute necrotizing pancreatitis, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), atrial fibrillation, history of sepsis and urinary tract infection. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #195 as cognitively intact. Resident #195's clinical record documented a transfer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-02-14 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for one of 23 residents in the survey sample. No written copy of the bed-hold policy was provided when Resident #195 was transferred to the hospital. In addition, staff reported no practice of providing written bed-hold policy information to residents or their families at the time of transfer out of the facility. The findings include: Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on 7/2/18. Diagnoses for Resident #195 included acute necrotizing pancreatitis, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), atrial fibrillation, history of sepsis and urinary tract infection. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #195 as cognitively intact. On 2/14/19 at 10:53 a.m., the admissions director was interviewed about any written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLOTTESVILLE HOLDINGS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/28/2021 |
| AK 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| AL 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CENTRAL BAY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MRCZ CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 & FAMILY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| PIVOTAL CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAS 1998 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| RAJCHENBACH, MOSHE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/28/2021 |
| RYBST CENTRAL MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/28/2021 |
| ALLEN SANTOS, ANNETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/28/2021 |
18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495178. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.