No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab Center

1801 Camelot Drive, Virginia Beach, VA 23454 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (757) 481-3500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$235,833 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (96) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $235,833 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1708 Old Donation Pkwy · (757) 419-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1280 N Great Neck Rd · (757) 481-2678 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Lindafaye0.2 mi
1604 Old Donation Pkwy
Park
1272 Mill Dam Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1320 Mill Dam Rd · (757) 354-2282

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.1%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.6%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.0%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.9%94.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.7%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine46.3%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.951.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.481.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 563 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.71U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 55.9–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 8.4–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting56.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge85.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 7.2–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
65.9%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 167.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

37
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-11)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2021-12-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

96 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 82 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to protect the residents right to be free from abuse and neglect by facility staff for one resident (R4) in a survey sample of five Residents. This deficient practice resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which constituted substandard quality of care. Following the verification of removal of the IJ, the scope and severity was lowered to a level three isolated. The findings included: For R4 the facility staff turned call light off from nurses' station, refused to come into the room, neglected to attend to resident needs and left resident in an unsafe position in the bed, which resulted in psychosocial harm for R4.R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to quadriplegia, due to gunshot wound to neck, epilepsy, neuromuscular disfunction of bladder, presence of suprapubic catheter, autonomic dysreflexia and PTSD (post-traumatic stress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse/neglect policy and take measures to protect a resident during an allegation of abuse/neglect, failed to report the allegation and failed to conduct a thorough investigation for one resident (Resident #4-R4) in a survey sample of five residents. This failure resulted in R4 sustaining psychosocial harm and the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) and resulted in substandard quality of care. The findings included:For R4 the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy and take measures to protect the resident from alleged perpertrators, failed to investigate an incident of abuse and neglect, and failed to report the allegation of abuse and neglect, which resulted in psychosocial harm leaving R4 feeling anxious, and fearful of having her needs met, fearful of not being heard in the event of a medical emergency and refusing to allow staff to close the door at night.R4 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to prevent, assess, identify and treat an avoidable pressure ulcer resulting in harm for one Resident (Resident #73) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: Resident #73, with contracted fingers of the left hand, experienced a pressure sore injury from his fingernails pressing into his palm. The pressure sore became infected resulting in cellulitis, which led to the identification of the pressure sore injury in the facility. The pressure sore and resulting infection caused the Resident to be sent out to the hospital for treatment with IV (intravenous) antibiotics for 10 days. The facility staff were unaware of the wound prior to the infection, and had not been applying the Residents hand splint (palm guard) to prevent the wound. Further the Resident was suffering from significant weight loss and malnutrition, increasing debility, and inability to heal. Resident #73 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family and staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to administer analgesics to treat and manage pain which constituted harm for 2 of 55 residents (Resident #473 and Resident #325), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility's staff failed to manage Resident #473 pain, which resulted in two emergency room visits to achieve relief and constituted harm. Resident #473 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 8/24/22. The resident's diagnoses at the time of his admission were lumbar spinal stenosis with lower back pain radiating to his feet, lumbar spinal fusion, and chronic musculoskeletal injuries from a motor vehicle accident. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/8/22, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #473's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure residents on four of four units had snacks available to them.The findings included: On 5/5/26 during initial tour on unit 1 CNA B was asked if there were snacks available to residents. CNA B opened the pantry refrigerator and pulled out a plastic bag containing 6 small individual cups of applesauce. CNA B was asked if the applesauce was the only snack that was available for the entire unit and she stated that they were. On 5/5/26 at approximately 11:15 am a tour of unit 2 was conducted CNA C was asked if snacks were available and she stated that they were not available. On 5/5/26 at approximately 11:25 am a tour of unit 3 was conducted and LPN B was asked if snacks were available to residents and she stated that they had a few containers of applesauce but if they wanted anything more substantial like a sandwich they would have to see if the kitchen would accommodate them. She stated that usually they could get something if a diabetic needed it. On 5/5/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for Hemorrhoids with internal treatment with a medication for one Resident (Resident #1-R1) in a survey sample of five Residents.The findings included.Resident #1 [R1] was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4-12-26. R1's diagnoses included Breast Cancer current, osteoporosis with femur fracture and surgical repair current, Beta Thalassemia, chronic kidney disease stage 4 severe, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Atrial fibrillation, Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular disease, Chronic heart failure, high blood pressure, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Thrombocytopenia, PTSD, panic disorder, and depression.R1's most recent and only admission minimum data set [MDS] assessment with an ARD [assessment reference date] of 4-12-26 revealed that the Resident was her own responsible party and was cognitively independent.Review of the clinical record revealed physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to clarify a physician's order which was written without a specific dosage, and with a contraindicated route for a significant medication, for one Resident (Resident #1/R1) in a survey sample of five Residents.The findings included.Resident #1 [R1] was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4-12-26. R1's diagnoses included Breast Cancer current, osteoporosis with femur fracture and surgical repair current, Beta Thalassemia, chronic kidney disease stage 4 severe, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Atrial fibrillation, Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular disease, Chronic heart failure, high blood pressure, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Thrombocytopenia, PTSD, panic disorder, and depression.R1's most recent and only admission minimum data set [MDS] assessment with an ARD [assessment reference date] of 4-12-26 revealed that the Resident was her own responsible party and was cognitively independent.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record reveiew and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one resident, (Resident #5-R5) in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included:For R5 the facility staff failed to ensure proper bathing, and grooming to prevent body odor and maintain good personal hygeine.R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hip pain (right), myalgia, stiff man syndrome, abnormal coagulation profile, and hypertension. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/24/26 R5 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. R5 was also coded as requiring physical assistance from staff for all aspects of ADL care.On 5/6/26 at 9:00 a.m. surveyor was standing outside of R5 room and could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for one resident in a survey sample of five residents, (Resident #5- R5).The findings included:For R5 the facility staff failed to ensure proper foot care to include exfoliation of dry / dead skin and care of mycotic toenails.R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hip pain (right), myalgia, stiff man syndrome, abnormal coagulation profile, and hypertension. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/24/26 R5 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. R5 was also coded as requiring physical assistance from staff for all aspects of ADL care.On 5/6/26 at 9:00 a.m. R5 was observed in a flat lying in bed with a sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to assure that a medication cart was not kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it. The findings included: During an observation tour of unit 1 on 12/22/25 at 11:35 AM, medication cart A was found unlocked outside of the nursing station, with no authorized staff within eyesight. At 11:37 AM the Unit 1 Manager approached the State Surveyor and stated, May I help you?'. The Unit 1 Manager further stated that she did not know where the Nurse that is assigned to medication cart A is currently located. On 12/22/25 at 11:38 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 entered the building through the outside entrance door and approached the State Surveyor. LPN #1 stated that she is the nurse assigned to medication cart A and she was outside making a phone call. On 12/22/25 at 1:15 PM an interview was conducted with the Unit 1 Manager. The Unit 1 Manager stated that LPN #1 should not have been outside of the building while medication cart A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to prevent the elopements for two (2) residents out of 24 residents. Resident #217 and Resident # 223, in the survey sample. The findings included: 1.Resident #217 eloped from the facility on 1/21/25 at 11:03 PM., The facility staff failed to report the elopement within the required time frame of 2 hours to the State Survey Agency. This behavior could have put the resident at risk for death, hypothermia and or being hit by a moving vehicle. Resident # 217 was originally admitted to the facility 10/16/18 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Suicidal Ideations and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of coded the resident as completing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent an elopement for two (2) out of 24 residents. Resident #217 and Resident # 223, in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #217 eloped from the facility on 1/21/25 at 11:03 PM., in the snow to the facility parking lot where employees and visitors parked their vehicles. This behavior could have put the resident at risk for death, hypothermia and or being hit by a moving vehicle. Resident # 217 was originally admitted to the facility 10/16/18 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; suicidal Ideations and unspecified dementia, unspecified Severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of coded the resident as completing the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, facility document reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to provide a sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment on four of four units and some common areas, which resulted in Substandard Quality of Life. The findings included: 1. Upon entering the facility on 10/4/24 at approximately 10:20 AM, water was observed leaking from the ceiling in the lobby. During the initial tour of Unit one at approximately 11:15 AM, the corridor was with much debris, many dark spots and a bed near the rear exit door. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floors were soiled, the trash can was without a liner and a used glove was observed on the floor. room [ROOM NUMBER] was with strong odors, straw papers, sugar packages and other debris was also observed on the floor. In room [ROOM NUMBER] pungent odors was in the room and the toilet was observed to be clogged. In room [ROOM NUMBER] soiled linen was observed beneath the sink and many black splatter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to serve food that is palatable, attractive, and an appetizing temperature for Residents on 4/4 units. The findings included: The facility staff was utilizing Styrofoam take out containers to serve food due to an inoperable dishwasher from August 9, 2024 - October 10, 2024. The Residents of all units complained about food being cold due to it sitting on the carts in the hall before being served. On 10/7/24 during the kitchen inspection it was noted that all food temps were within safe and acceptable ranges. food was plated in the Styrofoam containers and placed on the cart to send to the various units. Once arriving on the units the food was distributed by the CNA's. The time the carts sat on the floor before trays were delivered ranged from 10-20 minutes. Residents on 4/4 units complained of Lukewarm or Cold food. Many Residents stated that since they are using Styrofoam the food is cold. A review of the work orders and emails from maintenance to corporate revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 82 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was administered effectively to maintain the highest practicable well being of each resident. The findings included: The facility had a multi-system failure to include deficient practices including environmental services, sanitary and a safe building and dining, infection control practices, medication storage and administration, and resident abuse. These issues affected the quality of life of the residents in the facility. During the survey, investigations revealed the facility had issues involving multiple systems. There were issues involving environmental services to include inadequate laundry services with only one working washing machine for several months. Residents were complaining of not having adequate linens for their beds, not being able to get clean gowns , not getting their personal clothing washed and returned in timely manner. Staff members were observed while performing duties and providing care. Some staff members were overheard apologizing to other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to devise a facility-specific facility assessment The Findings included: On 10/9/2024 at 4:00 p.m., the facility Administrator was informed of the plan to review the Facility Assessment with the Administrator on 10/10/2024. A copy of the Facility Assessment was given to the surveyor. On 10/10/2024 upon arrival at the facility, the survey team was informed that the Administrator was no longer working at the facility as of the evening of 10/9/2024. The Regional [NAME] President of Operations was serving as the Acting Administrator. On 10/10/2024 at 11:15 a.m.,review of the facility assessment was conducted with the Regional Director of Operations (Acting Administrator). Review revealed the assessment was not tailored to the facility. The facility assessment was 22 pages in length. The assessment utilized a template but did not answer the questions as they related to the facility. Examples of non-compliance included: The facility assessment was dated 9/3/2024. There was no documentation that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility maintained a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases, infections, Legionnaires', and other potentially transmissible waterborne pathogens, on 4 of 4 Resident living units and communal spaces. The findings included; The facility staff failed to ensure that the facility was free from dampness, and mold. Surveyors observed wet mold on floors, walls, ceiling tiles, ceiling insulation and pipes, shower grout, base boards, and shower curtains, and Resident rooms. Unsanitary areas also included shower rooms, laundry facilities, the main kitchen, insects on 4 of 4 units, ice machines were not kept clean and sanitary, and staff further failed to complete, and document preventative maintenance, water/water damage testing, and cleaning schedules. On 10-9-24 observation of the Resident hydration ice machine in the closet across from the dining room revealed standing water on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. The findings included: For the facility staff failed to ensure that the facility was free from damp mildew smell, wet ceiling tiles, unsanitary shower rooms, and ice machines were kept clean and sanitary and document preventative maintenance and cleaning schedules. On 10/11/24 observation of the ice machine in closet across from the dining room revealed standing water on the floor, a rubber mat with live roaches (5-6 of them) crawling around and under it, the ice machine drainage pipe was dripping on the floor not in the drain. Under the ice machine was black slimy substance and wet paper trash as well. The entire area smelled of dampness and mildew. The Administrator was coming down the hall and asked to view the area when asked if he thought it was safe and sanitary for Residents to consume ice made in that environment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on information obtained during the Resident Group interview, observations, staff interviews, and Resident Group meeting minutes, the facility staff failed to demonstrate their response, action and/or a rationale for not taking action to the Resident Group grievances. The findings included: On 10/7/24 at 2:00 PM a Resident Group meeting was held with the President, [NAME] President, four resident who attends the group meeting regularly and one who does not attend the regularly. It was a consensus of all attending the meeting that their grievances are not acted upon even when they had been voiced multiple times. The groups stated they had never received communication from the administrative staff regarding any of their grievances. The group's President stated that the Activity's Director (AD) assists with the meeting and she ensures the departments are aware of their grievances but she has her assistant act as a liaison between the residents and the staff. A review of six months of the Resident Group minutes revealed that the residents voiced the following concerns multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent repeated willful abuse and neglect, failed to report the abuse to the state agency, failed to fully investigate the abuse, failed to protect the victims during the investigation, and further failed to implement their abuse and neglect policies for four known Residents (Residents #68, #20 and #521, ) in a survey sample size of 55 residents. The findings included: The facility failures described above resulted in the willful abuse of Residents #68, #20, and a third unknown Resident victim as perpetrated by Resident #521. Resident #68 (victim 1)was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: heart failure, hypertension, high cholesterol, malnutrition, peripheral venous insufficiency, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, scoliosis, rhabdomyolysis, and foot pain. Resident #68's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policies to prevent repeated willful abuse and neglect, in so doing, failed to report the abuse to the state agency, failed to fully investigate the abuse,and further failed to protect the victims during the investigation, for four known Residents (Residents #68, #20, #521, and #325) in a survey sample size of 55 residents. The findings included: The facility failures described above resulted in the willful abuse of Residents #68, #20, and a third unknown Resident victim as perpetrated by Resident #521. Resident #68 (victim 1)was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: heart failure, hypertension, high cholesterol, malnutrition, peripheral venous insufficiency, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, scoliosis, rhabdomyolysis, and foot pain. Resident #68's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent repeated willful abuse and neglect, failed to report the abuse to the state agency, failed to fully investigate the abuse, failed to protect the victims during the investigation, and further failed to implement their abuse and neglect policies for four known Residents (Residents #68, #20, #521, and #325) in a survey sample size of 55 residents. The findings included: The facility failures described above resulted in the willful abuse of Residents #68, #20, and a third unknown Resident victim as perpetrated by Resident #521. Resident #68 (victim 1)was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: heart failure, hypertension, high cholesterol, malnutrition, peripheral venous insufficiency, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, scoliosis, rhabdomyolysis, and foot pain. Resident #68's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent repeated willful abuse and neglect, failed to fully investigate the abuse, failed to report the abuse to the state agency, failed to protect the victims during the investigation, and further failed to implement their abuse and neglect policies for four known Residents (Residents #68, #20, #521, and #325) in a survey sample size of 55 residents. The findings included: The facility failures described above resulted in the willful abuse of Residents #68, #20, and a third unknown Resident victim as perpetrated by Resident #521. Resident #68 (victim 1)was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: heart failure, hypertension, high cholesterol, malnutrition, peripheral venous insufficiency, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, scoliosis, rhabdomyolysis, and foot pain. Resident #68's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a comprehensive care plan for care and services to maintain the highest practicable well being for two residents, (Resident #73, and #521) in a survey sample of 55 residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #73 had contractures with splints and palm guards required to prevent further contracture and maintain skin integrity. No care plan was ever devised for the palm guards and the splinting care plan was not individualized nor Resident centered. Resident #73, with contracted fingers of the left hand, experienced a pressure sore injury from his fingernails pressing into his palm. The pressure sore became infected resulting in cellulitis, which led to the identification of the pressure sore injury in the facility. The pressure sore and resulting infection caused the Resident to be sent out to the hospital for treatment with IV (intravenous) antibiotics for 10 days. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the professional standards of nursing practice for 2 residents, (Residents #89, and #161) in a survey sample of 55 residents. The Findings Included: 1. For resident #89 the facility staff failed to apply a Cardiac Monitor, to the Resident for the required time frame to capture and diagnose the cause of repeated syncopal episodes from suspected heart arrythmias (irregular heart beats). Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], after a 6 day hospitalization. Diagnoses included; Chronic Kidney disease, sick sinus syndrome after syncope and collapse on 7-12-24, dementia, hypertension, malnutrition, stroke, and anemia. Resident #89's most recent Minimum Data set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8-1-24. Resident #89 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure two Residents (Resident #89 and #68) received ADL (activities of daily living) care to include hygiene and showers in a survey sample of 55 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #89 her fingernails were long and dirty/encrusted with a brown substance, and the resident did not receive twice weekly showers. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], after a 6 day hospitalization. Diagnoses included; Chronic Kidney disease, sick sinus syndrome after syncope and collapse on 7-12-24, dementia, hypertension, malnutrition, stroke, and anemia. Resident #89's most recent Minimum Data set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8-1-24. Resident #89 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #89 required extensive to total assistance from one to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to identify and address necessary behavioral health services, and failed to devise and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for identified responses to stressors for one Resident with non-Alzheimer's type dementia with a language barrier (Resident #521) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #521 the facility staff failed to obtain a physician ordered psychiatric consult timely, failed to conduct behavior monitoring, failed to provide a comprehensive care plan for emotion regulation, failed to identify stressors and responses such as language barrier and supervision, to those stressors, which resulted in aggressive behaviors aimed at and impacting other residents. The facility failures described above resulted in the willful abuse of Residents #68, #20, and a third unknown Resident victim as perpetrated by Resident #521. Resident #521 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure significant medication was administered for 5 of 55 residents (Resident #47, Resident #57, Resident #424, Resident #372 and #161), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #47 was originally admitted to the facility 3/11/20. The resident's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, anemia, and constipation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/22/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #47's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 10/1/24 at 7:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #47. Resident #47 stated that there was no nurse on unit 3 from 3pm to 11pm and 11pm to 7am on 8/17/24. Resident #47 also stated that due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to remove expired medications and provide the date medications were opened on 2 of 4 facility units. The findings included: 1. On 10/9/24 at 12:55 PM an observation of the medication administration cart on Unit 3 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed 1 opened multi-dose Humalog (insulin lispro) 100 units/ml KwikPen with an open date of 9/6/24. A review of the manufacturer's literature indicated to discard the insulin lispro Kwikpen 28 days after opening. An interview with LPN #1 was conducted on 10/9/24 at 12:57 PM. LPN #1 stated that the Humalog (insulin lispro) 100 units/ml KwikPen should not be on the medication cart due to the opening date being more than 28 days. 2. On 10/9/24 at 1:05 PM an observation of the medication administration cart on Unit 3 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed 1 opened multi-dose Fiasp (insulin aspart) 100 units/ml injection pen with an open date of 7/31/24. A review of the manufacturer's literature indicated to discard the Fiasp (insulin aspart) 100 units/ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for the facility. The findings included: For the facility, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment was kept pest free, roaches both alive and dead were observed at the facility. On 10/7/24 during the kitchen inspection there were 2 dead roaches noted in the dry storage area and one in the kitchen near the 3-compartment sink. On 10/11/24 observation of the ice machine in closet across from the dining room revealed standing water on the floor, a rubber mat with live roaches (5-6 of them) crawling around and under it, the ice machine drainage pipe was dripping on the floor not in the drain. Under the ice machine was black slimy substance and wet paper trash as well. The entire area smelled of dampness and mildew. During the entire survey there were fruit flies as well as large flies noted on all units and in the common areas as well. A review of the pest control logs revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview the facility failed to maintain a training program for all new and existing staff based on the facility's assessment. The findings included: The facility failed to maintain a training program for all new and existing staff. Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all facility staff had completed all the required training. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that all staff members were educated on Resident's rights and facility responsibilities. The findings included: Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all facility staff had completed all the required training for the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that all staff members were educated regarding the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement The findings included: Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all facility staff had completed all the required training for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that all staff members were educated on Compliance and Ethics. The findings included: Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all facility staff had completed all the required training for Compliance and Ethics. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that all Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) completed the mandatory twelve (12) hours of education each year. The findings included: Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all CNAs had completed the mandatory twelve (12) hours of education each year which addressed each CNA's areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews the facility assessment and the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that all staff members were educated on Behavioral health. The findings included: Review of the Staff Education and Relias training transcripts revealed that not all facility staff had completed all the required training for Behavioral health care and services. On 10/11/24 at approximately 8:15 PM, a final interview was conducted with the Administrator, Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing and two regional Nurse Consultants. They had no comments and voiced no concerns regarding the above information.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff has failed to determine that Residents are clinically appropriate to self-self-administer medication for 1 Resident (#142) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #142 the facility staff allowed the Resident to self-administer the psychotropic medication, trazadone (an anti-depressant used to treat insomnia), without an assessment to determine if it was clinically appropriate for him to do so. On 10/7/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #142 who stated that they used to let him keep his trazadone by his bedside and take it when he wants to. He stated that he now has to ask for it and it Takes an act of God to get it. When asked if he had any special lock box for it, he stated that he did not he used to keep it on his night table. On 10/8/24 a review of the clinical record revealed the following orders for trazadone: trazodone HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG Give 1.5 tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia MAY GIVE ANYHTIME BETWEEN 7PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, for 2 Residents (# 161 and # 107) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 161, the facility staff failed to ensure the clock on the bedroom wall was working. Resident # 161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Primary Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Septic Arthritis of the Knee, Heart Failure, and edema. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/10/2024. Resident # 161's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score was a 14 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 10/92024-10/11/2024. During rounds on 10/9/2024 at 1:15 p.m., Resident # 161 was observed lying in the bed and watching television. Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a clinical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to thoroughly and accurately complete the Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability (PASARR) for 2 of 55 residents (Resident #56 and #28), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to code Resident #56's PASARR assessment for a current serious mental illness. Resident #56 was originally admitted to the facility 6/1/24 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident's current diagnoses included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), an anxiety disorder, ODC, personality hysterical and a major depressive disorder with recurrent, severe psychotic symptoms. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/2/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #56's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to have an ongoing discharge planning process which focused on the resident's/resident representative discharge goals for 1 of 31 residents (Resident #119), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #119 was originally admitted to the facility 2/17/23 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident's current diagnoses included intellectual disability, aphasia and a history of cancer of the colon which required a hemicolectomy and resulted in an ileostomy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/3/24 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. The resident was admitted on [DATE] to the nursing facility after surgery for colon cancer. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to apply the correct size Ostomy appliance and failed to provide care to an ostomy according to the physician's order for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #119 was originally admitted to the facility 02/17/23 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Ileostomy Status, Autistic Disorder and Malignant Neoplasm of Sigmoid Colon. The quarterly Revision Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/03/24 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired for daily decision making. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goal) the resident was coded as being independent with eating, Substantial/ maximal with toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to prevent significant weight loss and malnutrition for one Resident (Resident #73) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: Resident #73, suffered significant weight loss and malnutrition, increasing debility, and promoting an inability to heal from a new pressure sore injury which became infected leading to cellulitis and required hospitalization. Resident #73 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], was hospitalized on [DATE] for a pressure sore injury with infection and cellulitis and returned 10 days later on 6-1-24. Diagnoses included: Acute infection/cellulitis of upper left limb, stroke with left hemiplegia, dementia, contractures of left side limbs, dysphagia, epilepsy, hypertension, hypernatremia, and vitamin D deficiency. Resident #73's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on information obtained during the as worked nursing schedule nursing staff, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week which could potentially affect all residents. The facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The findings included; A review of the as worked schedule from 11/19/24 through 12/05/24. The facility staff was unable to verify 8 consecutive hours a day of RN coverage for at least 2 days on the following dates: 11/30/24 and 12/01/24. The above dates were verified by the Corporate Nurse Consultant (CNC) #2 on 12/03/24 at approximately 4:40 PM. The CNC #2 said there was no RN coverage, but there should have been coverage on 11/30/24 and 12/01/24. A final interview was conducted on 12/04/24 at approximately 5:45 PM., with the Corporate Nurse Consultant (CNC) #2. The CNC #2 said that RN coverage should have been provided on the above dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide specific and adequate treatment services for mental health and psychosocial concerns for one Resident with depression, and anxiety (Resident #126) in a survey sample of 30 Residents. Resident #126 did not receive adequate psychosocial, psychiatric, nor psychoactive medication care and services while in the facility after multiple falls, a hospitalization with fracture and head injury, and after return to the facility with behavioral issues complicated by new onset confusion. Further the facility failed to reinstitute long standing medication therapy for depression and anxiety after the hospitalization return. The findings included: Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged back to the hospital on [DATE] for a fall with refracture of right hip, and head injury with acute subdural hematoma. He was readmitted on [DATE] after the 2-day hospital stay, and was transferred back to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility social worker failed to provide services for one resident (Resident #521) in the survey sample of 55 Residents The findings included; For Resident #521, the facility Social worker failed to provide medically related social services to meet the Resident's needs for a strictly Spanish speaking Resident who had signs of frustration, and aggression. Resident #521 abused 3 Residents in the facility and exhibited aggressive behaviors and signs of distress which were never assessed and care planned, and not evaluated by medical social work. For Resident #521 the facility staff failed to obtain a physician ordered psychiatric consult timely, failed to conduct behavior monitoring, failed to provide a comprehensive care plan for emotion regulation, failed to identify stressors and responses such as language barrier and supervision, to those stressors, which resulted in aggressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to procure routine medications as ordered by the physician for 2 Residents (#142, #161) in the survey sample of 55 residents and establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs. The findings included: 1. For Resident #142 the facility staff failed to sign off administration of all 9 a.m. medications on 9/1/24 as well as failing to document why the medications were not given. On 10/10/24 during clinical record review it was discovered that Resident #142 did not receive any of his 9 a.m. medications on 9/1/24. Those medications included vitamins, iron, aspirin (given for dx. of Atrial Fibrillation, a cardiac arrhythmia) and Namenda (a medication given to slow the progression of dementia). The record contained no skilled charting for 9/1/24 and none of the ordered vital signs for that shift. On 10/10/24 at approximately 2 p.m. an interview with the DON and the Clinical Nurse Consultant was conducted,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure food was prepared, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 4 kitchen staff. The findings included: The preparing the evening meal on 10/7/24 failed to ensure the beard guard was sufficient to cover his large amount of facial hair. On 10/7/24 at approximately 5:00 PM a staff member who identified himself as the cook (Other Employee #9) was observed preparing food with a beard guard that only halfway covered his facial hair. When asked about it he stated, It's the only one the facility provides, and it doesn't fit right. A review of the facility policy entitled Staff Attire read: Policy Statement: It the center policy that all Dining Services employees wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. Action Steps: 1. The Dining Services Director ensures that all staff members have their hair off their shoulders confined in a hair net or cap and facial hair properly restrained. On 10/7/24 at approximately 5:30 p.m. Corporate employee #1 went to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition The findings included: For the facility, the facility staff failed to ensure the dishwasher, and 2 washing machines were functional and available for use by staff. On 10/7/24 during the kitchen inspection the kitchen staff were noted to be using Styrofoam take out containers for food service during the lunch and dinner meals. When questioned Other Employee #9 stated the dishwasher has been broke for weeks now. He stated we have a new one it's just not hooked up yet. On 10/8/24 an interview was conducted with Other Employee #5 who stated that he wasn't exactly sure how long the dishwasher had been down. He was asked to research and provide a timeline. 8/6/24 - dishwasher was purchased (evidenced by email from corporate purchasing office to maintenance). 9/24/24 - dishwasher arrived at facility (as evidenced by email between maintenance and supplier). 10/10/24 - during the current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on family interview, a clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to notify the resident's Emergency Contact of his transfers to the emergency room (ER) for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #473), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #473 was originally admitted to the facility 8/5/22 and he was discharged home on 8/24/22. The resident's diagnoses at the time of his admission were lumbar spinal stenosis with lower back pain radiating to his feet, lumbar spinal fusion and chronic musculoskeletal injuries from a motor vehicle accident. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/8/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #473's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 10/9/24 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with Family Member (FM) #1. FM #1 stated while her brother was a resident at the facility he was transferred to the hospital because they facility's staff did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on family interviews, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a discharge summary at the time of discharge for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #472), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #472 was originally admitted to the facility 8/7/24 and was discharged no return anticipated on 8/10/24 . The resident's diagnoses included diabetes, hypertension and recurrent urinary tract infections. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/10/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #472's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 10/9/24 at 12:40 PM an interview was conducted with Family member (FM) #2. FM #2 stated that Resident #472 was transferred to the long term care facility on 8/7/24 after a hospital stay. FM #2 stated upon arrival to the facility she and her sister were very dissatisfied because of the odors, pest, the appearance of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent an elopement for two (2) out of 24 residents, Resident #217 and Resident # 223, in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #217 eloped from the facility on 1/21/25 at 11:03 PM., in the snow to the facility parking lot where employees and visitors parked their vehicles. This behavior could have put the resident at risk for death, hypothermia and or being hit by a moving vehicle. Resident # 217 was originally admitted to the facility 10/16/18 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Suicidal Ideations and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of coded the resident as completing the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs for 2 of 55 residents (Resident #47, #472), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. On 10/1/24 at 7:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #47. Resident #47 stated that there was no nurse on unit 3 from 3pm to 11pm and 11pm to 7am on 8/17/24. Resident #47 also stated that due to this, she did not receive her Gabapentin, Tylenol, or Lisinopril. On 10/2/24 at 12:15PM an interview was conducted with the two (2) Regional Nurse Consultants. The Regional Nurse Consultants stated that the expected staffing levels for all shifts is the following on all the nursing units: 2 Nurses for 7am - 3pm shift, 2 Nurses for 3pm - 11pm shift, and 1 Nurse for 11pm-7am shift. The Regional Nurse Consultants also stated that on 8/17/24 only 1 Nurse worked on Unit 3 from 3pm - 11pm and only 1 Nurse worked on Unit 4 from 3pm - 11pm. The Regional Nurse Consultants further stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide requested medical records for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #171), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #171 was no longer a resident of the facility; therefore, a closed record review was conducted. Resident #171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the resident was discharged home on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cystic fibrosis with pulmonary manifestations, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/31/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #171's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 10/8/24 at 10:45 AM an interview was conducted with the Regional Nursing Consultant. The Regional Nursing Consultant stated that due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet professional standards for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: The facility staff failed to meet professional standards by administering medications as ordered for Resident #4. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: sepsis, dementia, cardiomyopathy, Parkinson's and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/27/23, coded the resident as scoring a 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer, bathing, bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, toileting and moderate assist for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide evidence of ADL (specifically incontinence care and feeding assistance) care for Resident #1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/24, coded the resident as scoring a 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer and bathing; extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet provide catheter care for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide urinary catheter care for Resident #4. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: sepsis, dementia, cardiomyopathy, Parkinson's and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/27/23, coded the resident as scoring a 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer, bathing, bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, toileting and moderate assist for eating. A review of the comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide feeding assistance to prevent weight loss for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: The facility failed to provide feeding assistance to prevent weight loss for Resident #1. Resident #1 weighed 127 pounds on 1/13/23, 117.6 pounds on 5/6/23 and currently 99.3 on 5/1/24. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/24, coded the resident as scoring a 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, resident observation, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet resident needs for two of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1 and Resident #4. The findings include: 1.The facility staff failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet Resident #1's needs. During the course of the standard, licensure and complaint Medicare survey conducted 5/24/24-5/29/24, a request was made on 5/24/24 for the as worked staffing schedule for 3/1/24-5/24/24. When asked during the entrance conference if there were any staffing waivers, ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing, stated, No, there are no waivers. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide snacks at bedtime and meals in a timely manner. The findings include: Mealtimes provided by the facility indicated that breakfast was to be delivered to unit 2A at 8:10 AM and unit 2B at 8:40 AM; lunch was to be delivered to unit 2A at 12:15 PM and unit 2B at 1:05 PM. During the survey period of 5/24/24-5/29/24 meals were observed to be delivered on 5/24/24 unit 2B at 9:00 AM. On 5/28/24 on unit 2A breakfast was delivered at 8:30 AM unit 2 B at 8:55 AM and unit 2A lunch at 12:35 PM and unit 2B at 1:15 PM. 5/28/24 tour of the pantries on all units revealed the following: 1:10 PM observations of Unit 1 pantry: Lance PB cheese crackers 6 packs, 12 chocolate puddings, no applesauce, no graham crackers, no milk, no cheese. 1:15 PM observations of Unit 2 pantry: Lance PB cheese crackers 5 packs, Lance Toasted crackers 10 packs, no applesauce, no graham crackers, no milk, no cheese. 1:25 PM observations on Unit 3 pantry: Lance PB cheese crackers 3 packs, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility's documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and enhance each resident's right to a dignified existence and being respected for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/24, coded the resident as scoring a 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer and bathing; extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, toileting and eating. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 5/22/23 revealed, FOCUS:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to respect the resident's and RP's (responsible party) right to participate in care planning for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/24, coded the resident as scoring a 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for transfer and bathing; extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, toileting and eating. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 5/22/23 revealed, FOCUS: Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the RP (responsible party) of a change in condition for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: The facility failed to notify the RP for Resident #1's weight loss. Resident #1 weighed 127 pounds on 1/13/23, 117.6 pounds on 5/6/23 and currently 99.3 on 5/1/24. No notification to family after 7/28/23. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: CKD (chronic kidney disease), vascular dementia and stroke with hemiplegia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/24, coded the resident as scoring a 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring total dependence for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to notify the physician of not of medications not being administered to 20 Residents (the entire Unit 3 B Assignment) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: For the 20 Residents on assignment B in Unit 3, the facility staff failed to notify the physician that she did not give medications from 3 PM - 7 PM on 2/6/24. Those meds included insulin, cardiac medications, anti-convulsant medications, anti-coagulants, and controlled substances for pain. On 2/20/24 at 5:29 PM RN B (Registered Nurse B) was interviewed, and she stated that on 2/6/24 she Volunteered to work 3 PM-7 PM shift to fill in the gap on the schedule. When asked if she was passing medications and working the floor, she stated that she was. She was asked if she received an admission that night, she stated that she had but was busy passing medications, so she had not gotten to the admission. When asked which assignment she had she stated that she had the B assignment which encompassed 20 Residents. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide services that meet professional standards of care for 20 Residents in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: For all 20 Residents in Unit 3 nursing assignment B, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. On 2/20/24 at 5:29 PM RN B (Registered Nurse B) was interviewed, and she stated that on 2/6/24 she Volunteered to work the 3 PM-7 PM shift to fill in the gap on the schedule. When asked if she was passing medications and working the floor, she stated that she was. When asked which assignment she had she stated that she had the B assignment which encompassed 20 Residents. On 2/20/24 Surveyor B conducted a review of the clinical record, and it was found that none of the Residents on Unit 3 assignment B had received medications or treatments from 3-7 PM on 2/6/24. Medications were either not given, or given late, when the 7 PM -11 PM nurse came in. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services are provided consistent with the resident's physical status and immediate needs upon admission to the facility for one (1) Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to perform an admission assessment, obtain vital signs, enter orders, administer oxygen, notify the physician to verify the orders, review the discharge summary from the hospital for the provision of immediate care resulting in the resident being found on the floor of his room unresponsive 2 hours after arrival at the facility. Resident #1 was transferred to the facility from an acute care hospital with diagnoses that include but are not limited to acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to influenza A, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), history of prostate cancer, history of tongue cancer, and hypertension. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were offered and periodically reviewed; and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) forms were completed and accurate for ten residents out of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R) 51, R11, R33, R114, R67, R85, R407, R412, R126, and R107). Findings include: The facility's Advance Directives Policy, titled MFA [Medical Facilities of America] Policies Governing the Implementation of Self-Determination Rights read, in pertinent part, 3. All Residents at the time of admission will be provided with this document entitled MFA Policies Governing the Implementation of Self-Determination Rights which summarizes the Health & Rehabilitation Center's policies and procedures regarding advanced directives . 8. The original or a Health & Rehabilitation Center verified copy of any advance directive that is appropriately signed and witnessed as permitted by Virginia state law will be filed by the Health & Rehabilitation Center with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure food was stored safely for three of four unit refrigerators. This failure could possibly lead to cross contamination and food-borne illness for the residents on three units. Findings include: During an observation of Unit 2 refrigerator with the Dietary Manager on 12/29/21at 12:25 PM, the following items were unlabeled and undated in the refrigerator: two bags of food in plastic grocery bags, two containers of lean cuisine frozen meals, one slice of pizza in a Ziploc bag. Additionally, there was a bottle of French dressing with an expiration date of 11/03/21. During an observation of Unit 3 refrigerator with the Dietary Manager on 12/29/21at 12:30 PM, the following items were unlabeled and undated in the refrigerator: two opened bottles of water, one bottle of Frappuccino, a bag of apples, a bag of oranges, and a bottle of Gatorade. During an observation of Unit 1 refrigerator with the Dietary Manager on 12/29/21at 12:35 PM, the following items were unlabeled and undated in the refrigerator: blue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for six of thirty-four sampled residents (Resident (R) 107, R126, R199, R402, 407, and 412). Specifically, the nursing staff failed to document the completion of physician orders on the resident's medication administration records (MAR). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Documentation Summary dated 11/01/19 indicated Licensed Nurses and CNAs [Certified Nurse Aides] will document all pertinent nursing assessments, care interventions, and follow up actions in the medical record. Review of facility policy titled Monitoring dated 11/01/19 indicated Licensed nurses will complete blood glucose monitoring as ordered by the physician .4. Blood glucose checks will be documented on the eMAR [Electronic Medication Administration Record]. 1. R107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], according to the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Medical Diagnosis tab, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for six residents of nine residents (Resident (R) 403, R404, R405, R406, R407, and R408) reviewed for transmission-based precautions; three of seven residents (R37, R51, and R105) observed during the observation of medication administration; and three of seven residents (R3, R138, and R144) reviewed for catheter care. Specifically, enhanced droplet precautions were not followed for R403, R404, R405, R406, R407, and R408. Staff did not perform hand hygiene between R37, R51, and R105. Additionally, R3, R138, and R144's catheter bags were observed lying on the ground. Findings include: 1. Review of the CDC's Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of thirty-four sample residents (Resident (R) 404)). Specifically, R404's foley catheter bag was uncovered and within view of individuals in the corridor. Findings include: Review of facility policy title Suprapubic Catheter Reinsertion dated 11/01/19 instructs staff to . 18. Hang bag below level of the bladder and place privacy bag over the drainage bag. Review of the admission note, in the Progress Notes tab of electronic medical record (EMR), dated 12/24/21, revealed R404's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy in the setting of hyponatremia and acute cystitis. Review of R404's physician's orders in the Orders tab of EMR revealed R404 was admitted on [DATE] with an order for a Suprapubic Foley Catheter. Review of the R404's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/30/21 revealed R404 required extensive assistance with bed mobility; one person physical assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R) 85) had a physician's order and was screened/assessed for the self-administration of medications prior to medications being stored at the bedside and self-administered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration Medication at Bedside, dated 11/01/19, revealed, .physician's order in patient's chart for self-administration . complete self-administration screen . self-administration must be reviewed by interdisciplinary team . medications . to be self-administered will be identified on MAR [medication administration record]. Review of R85's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R85 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R85's EMR under the Med Diag tab revealed, multiple diagnoses to include congestive heart failure. Review of R85's Orders tab in the EMR revealed .Muro 128 Ointment 5 % (Sodium Chloride (Hypertonic))…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level 1 pre-screening of the resident for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission to the facility was completed for two of three residents (Resident (R) 13 and R133) reviewed for Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Planning Policies and Procedures dated 01/06/20, indicated, Prior to the arrival of a planned admission the Discharge Planner will collaborate with the Admissions Director to preview the transferring hospital's Level 1 PASRR (Level 1 Screening for Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Related Conditions) and/or initiate completion of the Level 1 PASRR if not completed by the transferring hospital. 1. Review of R13's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 08/11/04 and included, but was not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission to the facility for one resident of eight residents (Resident (R)404) reviewed for baseline care plans in a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Care Planning, dated 11/01/19, revealed, A licensed nurse, in coordination with the interdisciplinary team, develops and implements an individualized care plan for each patient in order to provide effective, person-centered care, and the necessary health-related care and services to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the patient. The computerized baseline Care Plan is initiated and activated within 48 hours. The Center will provide the patient and representative(s) with a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to: . any services and treatments to be administered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop, assist, and follow through to completion with discharge plans for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R) 133) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility did not have a person-centered discharge plan for R133. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Discharge Planning Policies and Procedures, dated 01/06/20 revealed, Discharge planning will review extended care (long-term care) patients for discharge planning needs and pursue placement . Communicate with patient. discharge plans . Discharge planning staff will proactively spearhead the discharge planning process and follow through to completion to ensure a discharge. Review of R133's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/21, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15, which indicated R133 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R133''s Profile tab in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program for two of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R) 33 and R51). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities Policies and Procedures dated January 2020 documented activities staff will monitor, evaluate and record patient's activities participation and response to activities. and .utilize the patient record to determine whether the patient's participation in activities and/or independent activities pursuits achieves the stated goals on the patient's plan of care. 1. Review of an admission Record located in R33's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder Review of a care plan dated 10/06/21 found in R33's EMR under the Care Plan tab indicated she would engage in independent leisure pursuits 2-4x's [times] weekly. The leisure activities listed included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice was provided for two of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R) 51 and R47). Specifically, the staff failed to ensure R51 was transported to her cardiologist follow up appointment on two different occasions. In addition, the staff failed to follow physician's orders for R47. Findings include: 1. Review of an admission Record located in R51's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Review of R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/21 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Progress Notes found in R51's EMR under the Assessments tab indicated she missed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed provide treatment as ordered for prevention for pressure ulcer/skin injury for one of nine residents (Resident (R) 138) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, General Wound Care/Dressing Changes dated 11/01/19 indicated, Provide treatments as ordered. Review of R138's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 11/17/15 and included, but was not limited to, the following diagnoses: quadriplegia and diabetes. Review of R138's Wound Evaluation located in the EMR under the Misc tab, dated 09/21/21, indicated an etiology of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD). Review of R138's Order Summary Report located in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed the following orders: 09/22/21 Hibiclens Liquid 4 % - Apply to bilateral buttocks topically every day and evening shift for MASD cleanse with hibicleanse, pat dry, apply Silver Sulfadiazine (SSD), cover with Abdominal (ABD) pad; 09/22/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident (R) 67) reviewed for limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, staff did not apply R67's right hand splint per physician's orders to maintain range of motion. Findings include: Upon request of a policy regarding residents' splints, the facility provided a documented titled, Assisting with Activities of Daily Living, undated, that revealed, .Splints keep . wrist, thumbs, fingers . in normal position. Review of R67's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R67 admitted to facility on 10/13/17. Review of the Med diag [Medical Diagnosis] tab in the EMR revealed multiple diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (loss of strength on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke, result of disrupted blood flow to the brain) affecting right dominate side. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed prevent accidents by failing to safely transfer a resident and perform neurological assessments for one of three residents reviewed for accidents (Resident (R) 42). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls Management Program dated 11/01/19 indicated, Evaluate, monitor, and document patient response for the first 24 hours (3 consecutive shifts) post fall, include a neurological assessment if the fall was unwitnessed and/or the patient hit his/her head. Review of R42's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 5/30/13 and included, but was not limited to, the following diagnoses: epilepsy, flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, and anoxic brain damage. Review of R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/17/21 indicated that R42 was to be transferred with a one-person assist. During an interview on 12/27/21 at 5:16 PM, R42 stated that she had a fall about a week ago…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to maintain the suprapubic urinary catheter for one resident of two residents (Resident (R) 404) reviewed for catheters. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R404's suprapubic urinary catheter was flushed every shift and daily dressing change per physician's orders. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Suprapubic Catheter Care dated 11/01/19 revealed It is the Center's policy to provide safe and proper care of a patient with a suprapubic catheter by evaluating elimination status, minimizing risk of bladder infection and maintaining skin integrity in accordance with the physician's order. Review of the admission note, in the Progress Notes tab of electronic medical record (EMR), dated 12/24/21, revealed R404's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy in the setting of hyponatremia and acute cystitis. Review of R404's physician's orders in the Orders tab of EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident (Resident (R) 58) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure R58 had reliable transportation to and from dialysis and the facility did not demonstrate ongoing communication to the dialysis center and assessment of the resident prior to dialysis. Findings include: Review of R58's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R58 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R58's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/22/21, revealed R58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed R58 had end stage renal disease and received dialysis. Review of R58's Med Diag tab in the EMR revealed multiple diagnoses to include end stage renal disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide alternatives to residents who did not like what was served and failed to provide alternatives of similar nutritive value when alternatives were provided for three of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R)131, R405, R412). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dining and Food Preferences dated October 2019 documented, It is the center policy that individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents/patients. Observation on 12/27/21 at 11:00 AM, revealed menu with alternative foods posted in main hallway. 1. R131 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], according to the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Medical Diagnosis tab. Record review of R131, revealed a Dietary Progress Note in EMR, under Progress Notes tab, dated 12/07/21 revealed R131 typically consumed 26%-100% of meals. Review of the EMR under Tasks tab revealed for month of December 2021 meal intake varied from 26%-100%.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 9 of 36 Residents, Residents #141, 170, 366, 467, 115, 20, 11, 126, and 38. The findings included: 1. For Resident #141, the facility failed to administer the Residents erythromycin ophthalmic ointment as ordered by the physician. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #141 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had been readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion, cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, and respiratory failure. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/24/19 included a BIMS (brief interview mental status) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. The Residents clinical record included a physicians order for erythromycin ointment 1 application in both eyes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for administration, failed to date opened medication, and failed to properly store medications for 5 of 36 Residents (#38, 11, 126, 20, and 7) and on 2 of 5 medication carts. The findings included: 1. For Resident #38, facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, muscle weakness, chronic pain, neurogenic bowel, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. On the quarterly minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 12/27/18, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. During an interview on 3/13/19 at 12:56 PM, the resident mentioned that during her stay, robaxin and gabapentin had both run out with no quick replacement. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure a complete DNR (do not resuscitate) form for 1 of 36 Residents, Resident #129. The findings included: For Resident #129 the facility staff failed to ensure a complete Virginia Department of Health DDNR (durable do not resuscitate) form. Resident # 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/13/19 coded the Resident as 3 out of 15 in Section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #129's clinical record was reviewed on 03/12/19. It contained a physician's order summary, which read in part Code status: DNR. The clinical record also contained a Virginia Department of Health DDNR form, which read as follows: I further certify (must check 1 or 2): [] 1. The Patient is CAPABLE of making an informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medication refusals for 3 of 36 residents in the survey sample (Resident #'s 126, 35 and 41). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician of medication refusals for Resident #126. Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of, but not limited to heart failure, high blood pressure, urinary tract infection, diabetes, manic depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/12/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #126 was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of 2 staff members for dressing, and 1 staff member for personal hygiene and being totally dependent on 1 staff member for bathing. The surveyor performed a clinical record review of Resident #126's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to protect the private healthcare information of residents on 1 of 4 units in the nursing facility (Unit 2). The findings included: The facility staff failed to protect the private healthcare information of residents on Unit 2. On 3/12/19 at 9:05 am, this surveyor observed confidential and private healthcare information for resident room #'s 46 through 60B. This information was on top of the medication cart and anyone walking by could view the information. This medication cart belonged to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #1. On 3/13/19 at 10:02 am, the surveyor observed private and confidential healthcare information for resident room #'s 31 through 45. This information was on top of the medication cart and anyone walking by could view the information. The medication cart belonged to LPN #2. The surveyor requested and received a copy of the facility's policy concerning Confidentiality on 3/13/19 at approximately 10:30 am from the director of nursing. This policy read in part, .Protect all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample (Resident #35). The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and review Resident #35's care plan in regards to his refusals of medications. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of, but not limited to high blood pressure, aphasia, stroke, anxiety disorder and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/26/18, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #35 was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing, and personal hygiene and being totally dependent on 1 staff member for bathing. During the clinical record review of Resident #35 on 3/12/19 and 3/13/19, the surveyor noted the resident had refused the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to administer pain medications for 2 of 36 Residents, (Residents #38 and #41) 1. For Resident #38, facility staff failed to consistently administer pain medications per physician orders. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, muscle weakness, chronic pain, neurogenic bowel, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. On the quarterly minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 12/27/18, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. During an interview on 3/13/19 at 12:56 PM, the resident mentioned that during her stay, robaxin and gabapentin had both run out with no quick replacement. Record review revealed that on 3/11 the Lidocaine patch was held (code 5=see note), without a nursing note to document the reason and on 1/10, Fentanyl and Lidocaine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to coordinate care with dialysis for Resident #316. Resident #316 was admitted to the facility 3/7/19 with the following diagnoses of, but not limited to end stage renal disease. The resident did not have an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) completed at the time of this survey. However, it was noted by the surveyor that the resident was .alert and oriented X4 . as documented in the nursing notes for 3/7/19 at 23:49 (11:49 pm). On 3/13/19, the surveyor could not find any documentation of communication between the facility and the dialysis center. The resident was noted to be receiving dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of every week. At 10:45 am on 3/13/19, the surveyor asked the director of nursing (DON) where to locate the documentation of communication between the facility and dialysis for Resident #316. The DON stated, We don't use the communication forms for dialysis and only chart exceptions if there are any noted. The surveyor notified the administrative team of the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to identify irregularities related to medications for 1 of 36 Residents, Resident #129. The findings included: For Resident #129, the pharmacist failed to identify prn (as needed) usage of psychotropic medications for longer than 14 days without being re-evaluated by a physician. Resident # 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/13/19 coded the Resident as 3 out of 15 in Section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #129's clinical record was reviewed on 03/13/19. It contained a signed physician's order summary, which read in part Ativan Tablet 1 mg (lorazepam). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for Psychosis related to UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSIS NOT DUE TO A SUBSTANCE OR KNOW PSYSIOLOGICAL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 36 Residents was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications, Resident #129. The findings included: For Resident #129 the facility staff failed to ensure that the psychotropic medications Ativan and Haldol were not used unnecessarily. Resident # 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/13/19 coded the Resident as 3 out of 15 in Section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #129's clinical record was reviewed on 03/14/19. It contained a signed physician's order summary, which read in part Ativan Tablet 1 mg (lorazepam). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for Psychosis related to UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSIS NOT DUE TO A SUBSTANCE OR KNOWN PSHYIOLOGICAL CONDITION (F29). Given with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 3 of 36 Residents were free of significant medication errors, Resident #88, Resident #90, and Resident #7. The findings included: 1. For Resident #88 the facility staff held the medication Novolog without a physician's order. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to hypertension, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus, quadriplegia, and depression. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/29/19 coded the Resident as 15 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #88's clinical record was reviewed on 03/13/19. It contained a signed physician's order summary, which read in part Novolog Solution 100 units/ml (Insulin Apart). Inject 20 units subcutaneously before meals for dmii (diabetes mellitus type 2). The Resident's eMAR (electronic medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 3 of 36 Residents, Resident #129, Resident #1 and Resident #11. The findings included: 1. For Resident #129 the facility staff failed to maintain a complete record. Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE] coded the Resident as 3 out of 15 in Section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #129's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE]. It contained a signed physician's order summary, which read in part Antianxiety Medication-Monitor for Drowsiness, slurred speech, dizziness, nausea, aggressive/impulsive behavior. Document 'Y if monitored and not of the above observed. N if monitored and any of the above was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to coordinate services with hospice to include a hospice plan of care for 1 of 36 residents (Resident #122.) Findings: Facility staff failed to obtain a care plan from Resident #122's hospice provider. The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 3/12/19 at 2:00 PM. Resident #122 was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included pulmonary fibrosis, hypertension, congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The latest MDS (minimum data set) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. She required facility staff assistance with all the ADLS (activities of daily living) with the exception of eating independent with staff set-up. Resident #122's CCP (comprehensive care plan) documented the resident was on hospice care, but did not detail the provision of services provided by hospice. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a hazard free environment. The findings included: The doors to the room that accessed the back of the dryers were rusted which allowed for debris from the outside to collect in this room. On 03/14/19 at 8:19 a.m., the surveyor and the maintenance director checked the area behind the dryers. This area was accessed from the outside by outside doors. Upon opening the doors, the surveyor was able to observe a moderate amount of debris from the outside that had blown in under the doors and through rusted out areas on the doors. After exiting this room, the surveyor notified the administrator of the issue regarding the debris. On 03/14/19 at 9:36 a.m., the maintenance director stated he had spoken with the door company and obtained prices for new doors. The maintenance director also stated he had swept out the backside of the dryers. The administrative staff were notified of the above issue during a meeting with the survey team on 03/14/19 at 12:38 p.m. The administrator verbalized that the new doors had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$235,833 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $104,520 — penalty dated 2026-05-07
  • $131,313 — penalty dated 2024-10-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VIRGINIA BEACH HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHESAPEAKE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EK 2005 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LL 2013 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MZR EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SILVERSTONE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SHERRING, ADAMIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/24/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.0M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 24%Other / private 17%

This home reported $6.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,052per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$422per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495237. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next