No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation Center

120 Anderson Avenue, Bowling Green, VA 22427 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (804) 633-4839 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 633-4839 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2020Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2020
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8051 Prosperity Way #100 · (804) 448-0198 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 W Broaddus Ave · (804) 633-5058 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.2 mi
15432 Rogers Clark Blvd · (804) 633-5543 · Call to confirm hours
Park
16221 Richmond Tpke · (804) 633-7277 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.8%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.6%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%15.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.1%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.4%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.4%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.621.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.811.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.7%CMS range 51.0–67.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.9–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 2.5–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
44.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-28)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide safety during incontinence care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. The facility staff failed to utilize two staff members to change Resident #10's soiled brief on 5/28/25. Resident #10 fell out of bed and sustained a broken femur. The facility's failure resulted in harm to Resident #10. The findings include: For Resident #10 (R10), the facility staff failed to utilize two staff members to change Resident #10 on 5/28/25. The resident fell out of bed and suffered a fractured femur. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 416/25, R10 was coded as being cognitively intact. She was coded as being completely dependent on staff for bed mobility. On 5/28/25 at 1:18 p.m., R10 was observed lying in bed. She was awake and alert. She stated only one CNA (certified nursing assistant) was in the room earlier that morning to provide incontinence care for her. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. The findings include: For Resident #10 (R10), the facility staff failed to implement Resident #10's care plan on 5/28/25 during incontinence care. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 416/25, R10 was coded as being cognitively intact. She was coded as being completely dependent on staff for bed mobility. On 5/28/25 at 1:18 p.m., R10 was observed lying in bed. She was awake and alert. She stated only one CNA (certified nursing assistant) was in the room earlier that morning to provide incontinence care for her. She stated the CNA was standing on R10's left, pulled the draw sheet too far, and the resident fell out of bed on the right side, landing on her knees. She stated she was still in a great deal of pain in both of her knees. She stated sometimes there are two CNAs when they provide incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide nutritional care and services consistent with a resident's comprehensive plan of care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The findings include For Resident #12 (R12), the facility staff failed to accurately monitor and document the resident's breakfast meal intake on 5/29/25. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/4/25, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. R12's comprehensive care plan revised on 3/4/25 documented, Nutrition Risk r/t (related to) therapeutic diet orders, hx/o (history of) sepsis, copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [lung disease]), gerd (gastroesophageal reflux disease), bipolar. Hx/o sig (significant) wt (weight) gain .Interventions: monitor intake and record each meal . R12's meal ticket for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an unnecessary medication for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. The findings include: For Resident #9 (R9), the facility staff failed to hold the medication hydralazine (medication for high blood pressure) per the physician ordered parameter of a systolic blood pressure less than 140. A review of R9's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/27/25 for hydralazine 50mg (milligrams)-one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension (high blood pressure). Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 140. A review of R9's March 2025 MAR (medication administration record) revealed the resident was administered hydralazine on 3/4/25 at 9:00 a.m. although the resident's systolic blood pressure was 134, administered hydralazine on 3/4/25 at 10:00 p.m. although the resident's systolic blood pressure was 137, and administered hydralazine on 3/5/25 at 9:00 a.m. although the resident's systolic blood pressure was 138…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions when providing ADL care including incontinence care, dressing and linen change on 5/29/25. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/6/25, the resident was assessed as being dependent for toileting, dressing and transfers. The assessment documented one venous or arterial ulcer present with dressing applications completed. Observation of R4's room on 5/28/25 at 11:53 a.m. revealed a sign located outside of the door which documented in part, Stop Enhanced Barrier Precautions . Wear gown and gloves when entering room to provide the following high-contact resident care activities: *Dressing *Bathing/Showering *Transferring *Changing Linens *Providing Hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for two of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #4. The findings include: 1a. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to administer antibiotics as ordered. The physician order dated, 10/17/24 at 3:26 p.m. documented, Amoxicillin Oral Tablet (1) 500 MG (milligrams); Give 1 tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime for dental abscess for 10 days. The MAR (medication administration record) for October 2024, documented the above order. For 10/17/24, the 9:00 p.m. dose documented a 5. A 5 indicates Hold/See Progress notes. Review of the progress notes for 10/17/24, failed to evidence any documentation as to the reason the medication was not administered. The physician order dated, 7/26/24 at 2:13 p.m. documented, Amoxicillin Oral Tablet 500 MG; Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for abscess for 14 days. The resident completed, as ordered, the Amoxicillin up to 11 1/2 days. The last dose was administered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to serve food at a palatable temperature on one of two units, Unit A. The findings include: The facility staff failed to serve food that was at a palatable temperature on one of two units, Unit A. Observation was made of the kitchen on 3/5/25 at 11:53 a.m. The food temperatures were taken and were as followed: Chicken - 197 degrees Peas - 198 degrees Puree Squash - 177.8 (thrown away) degrees Puree bread - 171 degrees Mashed potatoes - 171 degrees Puree chicken - 140.5 degrees Gravy - 166 degrees Puree peas - 147 degrees Minced moist chicken - 133 - returned to steamed - 12:12 p.m. - 180 degrees. Sweet potato fries at 12:12 p.m. - 165 degrees The chicken was put into rolls, topped with cheese and put in the oven to melt the cheese. A test tray of all foods served was prepared. The last cart was taken to Unit A at 1:04 p.m. The last resident was served and started eating at 1:30 p.m. The food was served on white styrofoam trays for this meal due to anticipated construction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchen and on one of two units. The findings include: Observation was made of the kitchen on 3/5/25 at 11:39 a.m. The freezer was observed with an open bag of frozen rolls, that was not labeled or dated. A box of southern style biscuit dough was open and the bag inside was open to air. No label or date noted on the box. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #1, the cook, who stated she doesn't remember labeling and dating a box in the freezer. On 3/5/25 at 12:07 a.m. OSM #2, a dietary aide, was preparing for the tray line to start. She had on her gloves and was resting her chin on her gloved hands. At 12:08 p.m. OSM #2 was observed washing her hands and donning new gloves. She proceeded to the tray line where she stood with gloved hands folded across her chest with her hands resting on her elbows. On 3/5/25 at 1:15 p.m. observation was made of the day room on the A side, during mealtime. CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: The comprehensive care plan dated, 5/17/23 and revised on 4/24/24, documented in part, Focus: Cardiac: the resident is at risk for cardiac complications secondary to chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, CAD (coronary artery disease) and PVD (peripheral vascular disease). Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Cardiology referral as indicated. Diagnostics as ordered. Labs (laboratory tests) as ordered. The physician order dated, 4/19/24, documented, Daily BP (blood pressure) monitoring and call Nephrology (kidney specialist) for SBP >140 or DBP (diastolic blood pressure) > 90. (phone number); every day shift for monitoring. The February 2025 MAR documented the above order. On the following dates the blood pressures were documented: 2/2/25 - 147/52 2/7/25 - 144/76 2/22/25 - 148/76 Review of the progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The findings include: For Resident #3(R3), the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan to include the use of a wander guard (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date 1/7/25, the resident scored a three of of 15, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making cognitive daily decisions. The physician order dated, 4/24/24, documented, Check function and placement of wander guard daily. Left ankle assess skin for breakdown every shift for placement & functioning. The comprehensive care plan dated, 6/1/23 and revised on 2/15/25, documented, Focus: The resident is at risk for elopement related to confusion and disorientation, exit seeking, severe cognitive impairment. Interventions: elopement risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to store a scoop used for dry pureed bread mix in a sanitary manner. On 3/26/24 at 11:30 a.m., 3/26/24 at 4:30 p.m., and 3/27/24 at 10:20 a.m., a scoop was observed sitting inside of a container of dry pureed bread mix. The handle of the scoop was touching the inside of the container. On 3/27/24 at 1:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #5 (the dietary manager). OSM #5 stated sometimes the cook uses the scoop inside the dry pureed bread mix throughout the day and at the end of the day, he washes the scoop and hangs it up. OSM #5 stated most of the time, the cook removes the scoop from the container as soon as he uses it. OSM #5 stated the scoop should not be stored in the container because you want to make sure it isn't cross contaminated and someone else hasn't used it for other purposes. On 3/27/24 at 4:14 p.m. ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide notification to the responsible party of a change in resident treatment for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309. The findings include: For Resident #309 (R309), the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of the Losartan (1) medication being held due to low blood pressure. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/29/2023, the resident scored 5 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The comprehensive care plan for R309 documented in part, Cardiac: the resident is at risk for cardiac complications secondary to hypertension r/t (related to) bilateral lower edema. Created on: 12/05/2023. Revision on: 12/18/2023. Review of R309's progress notes revealed the following: - 11/27/2023 0821 (8:21 a.m.) Note Text : Losartan Potassium Oral Tablet 100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a pressure injury for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #97. The findings include: For Resident #97 (R97), the facility staff failed to clean a pair of scissors immediately before pressure injury wound care was provided. R97 was admitted to the facility with a stage four pressure injury (1) on the left buttock. R97's comprehensive care plan dated 1/18/24 failed to document information regarding sanitation during wound care. A review of R97's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/12/24 to cleanse the left buttock with normal saline, pack with collagen particles, cover with moist gauze, and cover with bordered foam. On 3/27/24 at 1:55 p.m., during an observation of R97's pressure injury wound care, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 removed a pair of scissors from her pocket, placed the scissors on a clean field, picked up the scissors, cut a piece of collagen with the scissors, then placed the collagen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide urinary catheter care and services for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #97. The findings include: For Resident #97 (R97), the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's urinary catheter (1) drainage bag in a sanitary manner. R97's comprehensive care plan dated 1/19/24 failed to document information regarding the placement of the resident's urinary catheter drainage bag. A review of R97's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/21/24 that documented an order for a Foley (urinary) catheter related to a neurogenic bladder. On 3/27/24 at 8:26 a.m., R97 was observed lying in a low bed. The resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was attached to the bed frame and the bag was sitting on the floor. On 3/27/24 at 2:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. LPN #3 stated a urinary catheter drainage bag should not touch the floor for infection control reasons and also because someone's feet or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide urostomy care and services for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #259. The findings include: For Resident #259 (R259), the facility staff failed to obtain physician's orders for the type of urostomy wafer/pouch to use, and for how often the urostomy wafer/pouch should be changed. R259's comprehensive care plan dated 2/27/24 documented, The resident has a Urostomy. Change wafer and provide site care as ordered . A review of R259's clinical record revealed physician's orders to monitor urostomy output every shift and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection every shift. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal physician's orders for the type of urostomy wafer/pouch to use, and for how often the urostomy wafer/pouch should be changed. On 3/27/24 at 2:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. LPN #3 stated residents with urostomies should have physician's orders to monitor for output and to monitor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for two of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #86 and #62. The findings include: For Resident #86 (R86) and Resident #62 (R62), the facility staff failed to evidence comprehensive medically related social service assessments for continued ability to consent to intimate relations. R86 and R62 shared a semi-private room in the facility, planned to be married and were currently sexually active. R86 most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/25/2024 assessed the resident as scoring 6 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating they were severely impaired for making daily decisions. The 8/25/2023 MDS assessment documented R62 scoring 13 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide complete and accurate documentation for one of 33 residents, Resident #15. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence complete and accurate documentation for incontinence care for Resident #15. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: DM (diabetes mellitus), ESRD (end stage renal disease) and dementia. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/7/24, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as maximal assist for bed mobility, transfer, eating and hygiene. A review of Resident #15's comprehensive care plan dated 6/29/23 revealed, FOCUS:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence bed inspections for three of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #15, #38 and #54. The findings include: 1.The facility staff failed to perform bed rail inspections for the use of positioning / assist bars for Resident #15. Resident #15 was observed in bed with bilateral grab bars on 3/26/24 at 3:10 PM and 3/27/24 at 3:45 PM. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: DM (diabetes mellitus), ESRD (end stage renal disease) and dementia. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/7/24, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the required notification, to the Ombudsman, for a facility-initiated transfer for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #92 (R92). The findings include: For R92, the facility staff failed to have evidence that written notification was provided to the ombudsman for a facility-initiated transfer on 12/04/2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/24/2024, R92 scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R92 was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for R92 dated 12/04/2023 documented, Resident transferred out to (Name of Hospital) ER (emergency room) r/t (related to) fluctuations in blood pressure readings @ (at) 2100 (9:00 p.m.) 12/4/23. This nurse called hospital and spoke with (Name of Registered Nurse) in ER who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for three of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 93 (R93), Resident #15 (R15) and Resident #75 (R75). The facility staff failed to monitor a fluid restriction for R93; and failed to provide care and services for a central venous access (central line) for R15 and R75. The findings include: 1. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/31/2022, R93 scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was coded as receiving dialysis. The physician order dated 4/11/2022, documented, Fluid Restriction (1200 ml [milliliters]) Give the following fluid volume with medication administration: 7-3 [7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.] meds: (120 ml with morning meds and 120 ml afternoon meds) 3-11 [3:00 p.m. to 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the menu for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309; and for the dinner meal on 4/19/22. The findings include: 1. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/11/22, R309 scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating she is cognitively intact for making decisions. On 4/19/22 at 11:34 a.m., R309 was interviewed. R309 stated she had concerns about not getting the food that was on the meal ticket for each meal. R309 stated it was rare for them to receive anything close to what they had repeatedly told staff they were able to eat. On 4/19/22 at 1:37 p.m., R309 sat in a wheelchair at the overbed table. An open plate of food was on a tray on the overbed table. R309 was not eating. The meal ticket on R309's tray included the following items: shrimp and vegetable stir fry, orange twist, buttered white rice, roll, margarine,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of two refrigerators in the main kitchen. The findings include: The facility kitchen was observed on 4/19/2022 at 10:10 a.m. A container of sliced American cheese was observed in a refrigerator with and open date of 3/6/2022 and a use by date of 3/10/2022. A second container with shredded cheddar cheese did not have a date when opened, but had a use by date of 3/10/2022. When asked if these containers of cheese should be still available for use, OSM (other staff member) #1, the culinary services manager, stated the staff probably put the wrong dates on it. When asked if it should be available for use with the dates on it, OSM #1 stated, No, I guess not. The facility policy, Food Storage: Cold documented in part, The Dining Services Director/Cook(s) insures that all food items are stored properly in covered containers, labeled and dated. ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and RN (registered nurse) #1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain one of one dumpsters in a sanitary manner. The findings include: On 4/19/2022 at approximately 10:35 a.m. the facility dumpster was observed with OSM (other staff member) # 1, the culinary services manager. There were 11 used gloves around the dumpster area. A 12th used glove was found just outside the door to go back into the building. When asked who was responsible for maintaining the dumpster area, OSM #1 stated it is between dietary and maintenance. When asked if the gloves should be on the ground, OSM #1 stated, no. ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and RN (registered nurse) #1, the unit manager, were made aware of the above findings on 4/20/2022 at approximately 5:15 p.m. A request was made for the policy on maintaining the dumpster area on 4/20/2022 at 5:30 p.m. No further information was provided prior to exit.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to allow one of 37 residents in the survey sample to withdraw more than twenty dollars from their personal fund account at a time, Resident #99 (R99). The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 4/1/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. An interview was conducted with R99 on 4/19/2022 at approximately 12:30 p.m. R99 stated the facility keeps changing the rules about getting my money out. R99 stated the facility is only allowing the resident to take twenty dollars at one time. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #5, the receptionist, on 4/20/2022 at 3:24 p.m. When asked the process for residents to access their money in the personal fund account, OSM #5 stated the residents come to the front desk and ask for their money, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for 2 of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #33 and #97. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Resident #33 (R33) per the physician prescribed rate of three liters per minute. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask in a sanitary manner for Resident # 97 (R97). The findings include: 1. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/4/22, the resident scored 6 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of R33's clinical record revealed a comprehensive care plan dated 8/12/21 that documented, The resident has altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing r/t (related to) pneumonia. R33's April 2022 physician's order sheet documented a physician's order dated 3/28/22 for oxygen at three liters per minute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, the facility staff failed to perform annual performance evaluations on two of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) record reviews. The findings include: On 4/20/2022 at 9:23 a.m. OSM (other staff member) #7, the human resources staff member, presented the documentation of annual performance evaluations for three of the five CNAs; CNA #5, CNA #1, CNA #7. OSM #7 stated that CNA #4 and CNA #6 got an across the board raise so no performance evaluations were completed. The facility policy, Merit Increase documented in part, Policy: (Initials of company) will evaluate employees annually and reward eligible employees for performance through annual merit increases .Procedure: 1. Employees may earn merit increases for performance .4. Generally, all employees will receive a performance appraisals annually. ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and RN (registered nurse) #1, the unit manager, were made aware of the above findings on 4/20/2022 at approximately 5:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to honor a resident's preferences for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #309 (R309). The findings include: 1. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/11/22, R309 scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating she is cognitively intact for making decisions. On 4/19/22 at 11:34 a.m., R309 was interviewed. R309 stated she had concerns about not getting the food that was the meal ticket for each meal. R309 stated it was rare for them to receive anything close to what they had repeatedly told staff they were able to eat. On 4/19/22 at 1:37 p.m., R309 sat in a wheelchair at the overbed table. An open plate of food was on a tray on the overbed table. R309 was not eating. The meal ticket on R309's tray included the following items: shrimp and vegetable stir fry, orange twist, buttered white rice, roll, margarine, frosted carrot cake,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for one of nine residents during the medication administration observation, Resident #105. The facility staff failed to administer oral medication to Resident #105 (R105) in a sanitary manner. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/31/22, the resident scored 3 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 4/20/22 at 7:55 a.m., an observation of LPN #1 preparing and administering medications was conducted. LPN #1 popped a pill out of a blister pack and the pill dropped on top of the medication cart. LPN #1 scooped the pill into the medication cup then administered the pill to R105. LPN #1 had not disinfected the cart prior to the medication pass or dropping the pill on the cart. On 4/20/22 at 1:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet the requirements for advanced directives for four of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #24, #116, # 84, and #40). The facility staff failed to obtain a copy of Resident #24's Appointment of Agent to Make Healthcare Decision as documented on the resident's admission paperwork. The facility staff failed to periodically review, Resident 116's, Resident #84's and Resident #40's decisions regarding advance directives. The findings include: 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia, quadriplegia (Paralysis affecting all four limbs and the trunk of the body below the level of spinal cord injury. Trauma is the usual cause.) (1), diabetes, gastrointestinal bleed, and high blood pressure. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/14/2020 coded the resident as unable to answer the question for the BIMS and had both short and long-term memory difficulties. The physician's note 12/27/19 documented in part the resident presented with recurrent episodes of coffee ground emesis and moderate amount of dark brown drainage from the G -tube (gastrostomy tube), and Resident #89 was sent to the emergency room after giving IV (intravenous) fluids and lab [laboratory tests] work. Further review of the clinical record failed to evidence documentation that Resident #89's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia, quadriplegia (Paralysis affecting all four limbs and the trunk of the body below the level of spinal cord injury. Trauma is the usual cause.) (1), diabetes, gastrointestinal bleed, and high blood pressure. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/14/2020 coded the resident as unable to answer the question for the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) and had both short and long-term memory difficulties. The physician's note 12/27/19 documented in part the resident presented with recurrent episodes of coffee ground emesis and moderate amount of dark brown drainage from the G -tube (gastrostomy tube), and Resident #89 was sent to the emergency room after giving IV (intravenous) fluids and lab [laboratory tests] work. Further review of the clinical record failed to evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for five of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #4, #40, #15, #62, and #61). The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication for Resident #4, failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address Resident #40's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) and failed to implement Resident #40's comprehensive care plan for palm guards. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the care of Resident #15's PICC. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address Resident #62's prescribed anticoagulant medication Eliquis, and failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #61's use of a urinary catheter. The findings include: 1. Resident #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for eight of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #24, #4, #25, #31, #28, #21, #13 and #38. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to address Resident #24's prescribed and administered anti-anxiety medication Xanax. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating she was cognitively intact to make daily decisions. The physician order dated, 9/23/19 documented, Xanax [used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice to clarify physician orders for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #111 and Resident #23. The facility staff failed to clarify a physician order for Lorazepam for Resident #23, which lead to the resident receiving more than double the prescribed dose of medication. The facility staff failed to clarify physician orders for multiple as needed pain medications for Resident #23 to determine which and when each medication should be administered. The findings include: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: liver cancer, falls, hepatitis C- [inflammation of the liver. similar to hepatitis B, It is spread primarily through blood, though sexual transmission has been described. (1)], high blood pressure, diabetes, fractured hip and cirrhosis of the liver [chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for two of 59 residents in the survey sample with a central venous access, (Residents #40 and #15). Resident #40 had a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) (1) in place in her right arm during the time of the survey. There were no orders or documentation for the maintenance and care of the PICC. The dressing on the PICC was dated 1/29/2020, and had not been changed in 14 days. Resident #15 had a PICC in place in her right arm during the time of the survey. The dressing on the PICC was dated 1/30/2020; the dressing had not been changed in 13 days. The findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to persistent vegetative state (2),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for eight of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #267, #21, #24, #116, #55, #8, #317 and #320). The facility staff failed to review risks and benefits, failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails and failed to evidence that appropriate alternatives were attempted prior to the resident's use of bed rails for Resident #267, Resident #21, Resident #24, Resident #116, Resident #55, Resident #8, Resident #317 and Resident #320. The findings include: 1. Resident #267 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #267's diagnoses included but were not limited to bronchitis, high blood pressure and history of falling. Resident #267's admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/21/20, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Section G coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #111. Based on the comprehensive assessment the facility staff failed to ensure duplicate antianxiety medication was not administered to Resident #111. The findings include: Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: liver cancer, falls, hepatitis C-(inflammation of the liver. similar to hepatitis B, It is spread primarily through blood, though sexual transmission has been described.) (1), high blood pressure, diabetes, fractured hip and cirrhosis of the liver (chronic disease condition of the liver in which fibrous tissue and modules replace normal tissue, interfering with blood flow and normal function of the organ) (2). The resident is on hospice care. The most recent MDS (minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #111) of 59 sampled residents was free of a significant medication errors. The facility staff administered both Lorazepam tablet (1 mg) twice daily and Lorazepam concentrate three times a day resulting in Resident #111 receiving a total of two milligrams of Lorazepam per day from 2/1/2020 through 2/7/2020, and a total of 5 mg per day, from 2/8/2020 through 2/12/2020. The findings include: Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: liver cancer, falls, hepatitis C-(inflammation of the liver. similar to hepatitis B, It is spread primarily through blood, though sexual transmission has been described.) (1), high blood pressure, diabetes, fractured hip and cirrhosis of the liver (chronic disease condition of the liver in which fibrous tissue and modules replace normal tissue, interfering with blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature. The facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during lunch on 2/12/20. The findings include: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #96's diagnoses included but were not limited to paralysis and diabetes. Resident #96's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/23/20, coded the resident as being cognitively intact. On 2/11/20 at 12:52 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #96. The resident stated the facility food was cold. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #84's diagnoses included but were not limited to major depressive disorder and high blood pressure. Resident #84's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 1/16/20, coded the resident as being cognitively intact. On 2/11/20 at 1:03 p.m., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for three of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #40, #15, and #318); and in one of two dining rooms, (Dining Room B); and in two of 62 resident rooms, (Rooms #35 and #36). The facility staff failed to ensure PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) care was provided including dressing changes, to prevent infection for Resident #40 who had a PICC in place in her right arm, and Resident #15, who had a PICC in place in her right arm. The facility staff failed to store Resident #318's nebulizer mask with a protective covering, to prevent infection on 2/12/2020. The facility staff placed ungloved thumbs on the eating surfaces of dishes being served to the residents in Dining Room B of the facility during lunch on 2/11/2020. The facility staff removed a straight-back chair from room [ROOM NUMBER] and placed it in room [ROOM NUMBER], without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure three of 59 sampled residents, (Residents #25, #21 and #13) were free from abuse. On 11/15/18, Resident #25 was hit in the chest by Resident #31. On 12/22/19, Resident #21 was hit in the face by Resident #28 and on 7/5/19, Resident #38 was observed with his hand inside Resident #13's brief and was caressing Resident #13's buttocks. The findings include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25's diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes, chronic kidney disease and repeated falls. Resident #25's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/26/19, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses included but were not limited to paralysis, heart disease and difficulty swallowing. Resident #31's quarterly MDS with an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating she was cognitively intact to make daily decisions An interview was conducted with Resident #24 on 2/11/2020 at 4:58 p.m. When asked if anyone had ever cursed at her, hit her or abused her, Resident #24 stated that the gentleman across the hall from her (Resident #41) called her a bitch. Resident #24 stated she had reported it. The facility policy documented impart, The Administrator will provide to the State Agency an initial report for occurrences of alleged or reasonably suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or crime against a patient of the Center…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (1). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating she was cognitively intact to make daily decisions An interview was conducted with Resident #24 on 2/11/2020 at 4:58 p.m. When asked if anyone had ever cursed at her, hit her or abused her, Resident #24 stated that the gentleman across the hall from her (Resident #41) called her a bitch. Resident #24 stated she had reported it. A review was conducted of the Facility reported Incidents (FRIs) and the grievance logs, The review failed to evidence any documentation of Resident #24 being called a bitch by Resident #41. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided or sent to the resident and/or responsible party regarding the reasons for a transfer to the hospital for three of fifty nine residents in the survey sample, (Residents #74, #89 and #66). The facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided to Resident #74 or the responsible party (RP) for the residents 12/12/19, hospital transfer, failed to evidence written notification to Resident #89 or the RP for the residents 12/27/29 hospital transfer and to Resident #66 or the RP for the residents 12/20/19 hospital transfer. The findings include: 1. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #74's diagnoses included but were not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic, nonreversible lung disease which is a combination of emphysema and chronic bronchitis) (1), left femur fracture (break in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #318's physician-ordered TED (thromboembolic-deterrent) hose. The findings include: Resident #318 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease (2), and obstruction of bilateral ureters (3). He had not been a resident at the facility long enough to have a completed MDS (minimum data set) assessment. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], Resident #318 was documented as being alert only to person. 02/12/20 at 8:19 a.m. and at 11:47 a.m., Resident #318 was observed lying in bed; both feet were observed and the resident was not wearing TED (1) hose. On 2/13/20 at 9:07 a.m., Resident #318 was observed sitting in a wheelchair by the nurses' station. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the plan of care for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to apply TED (thromboembolism deterrent) hose to Resident #318's on 2/12/2020, as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #318 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease (2), and obstruction of bilateral ureters (3). He had not been a resident at the facility long enough to have a completed MDS (minimum data set) assessment. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], Resident #318 was documented as being alert only to person. 02/12/20 at 8:19 a.m. and at 11:47 a.m., Resident #318 was observed lying in bed; both feet were observed and the resident was not wearing TED (1) hose. On 2/13/20 at 9:07 a.m., Resident #318…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries, and to promote healing of a pressure injury for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #267 and #40. The facility staff failed to assess Resident #267's pressure injuries from 1/16/20 until 2/11/20. The facility staff failed to ensure Bilateral palm guards were in place for Resident #40, per the comprehensive plan of care. The findings include: 1. Resident #267 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #267's diagnoses included but were not limited to bronchitis, high blood pressure and history of falling. Resident #267's admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/21/20, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Section M coded Resident #267 as having two stage two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #318. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask with a protective covering for Resident #318 on 2/12/2020. The findings include: Resident #318 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease (1), and obstruction of bilateral ureters (3). He had not been a resident at the facility long enough to have a completed MDS (minimum data set) assessment. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], Resident #318 was documented as being alert only to person. 02/12/20 at 8:19 a.m. and at 11:47 a.m., Resident #318 was observed lying in bed. During both observations, a nebulizer mask was lying directly on the bedside table. The mask was uncovered, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence a complete pain management program for one of fifty nine residents in the survey sample, Residents #23 and Resident #4. The facility staff failed to document the location of pain, pain scale and if any non-pharmacological interventions were provided prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication for Resident #4. The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease - (any abnormal condition, including atherosclerosis, affecting blood vessels outside the heart) (1), and amputation of his toes. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/25/2020 coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a drug regimen free of unnecessary medications for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #4). The facility staff administered a physician prescribed as needed narcotic pain medication to Resident #4 for a pain level rating of zero and failed to document non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to administering the as needed pain medication on 1/13/2020 and 2/9/2020. The findings include. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease - (any abnormal condition, including atherosclerosis, affecting blood vessels outside the heart) (1), and amputation of his toes. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/25/2020 coded the resident as scoring a 15 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to store milk in a safe manner in the A unit nourishment room. Two eight ounce cartons of skim milk with a sell by date of 2/4/20 was observed in the refrigerator. The findings include: On 2/12/20 at 12:12 p.m., observation of the A unit nourishment room refrigerator was conducted. Two eight ounce cartons of skim milk with a sell by date of 2/4/20 were observed in the refrigerator. On 2/12/20 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #7 (the dining services director). OSM #7 stated the dietary staff checks and restocks the unit refrigerators daily and usually several times a day. OSM #7 was asked if the dietary staff is supposed to check the dates on food and beverages. OSM #7 stated, Uh huh. OSM #7 was made aware of the above concern. OSM #7 stated the cartons of skim milk should not have been in the refrigerator because this date was past the sell by date. On 2/12/20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Residents #25 and #21. Resident #31 hit Resident #25 in the chest on 11/15/18 and Resident #28 hit Resident #21 in the face on 12/22/19. The facility staff failed to document these incidents in Resident #25's and Resident #21's clinical records. The findings include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25's diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes, chronic kidney disease and repeated falls. Resident #25's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/26/19, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses included but were not limited to paralysis, heart disease and difficulty swallowing. Resident #31's quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-04-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to have an registered nurse (RN), other than the director of nursing, on duty on 4/2/2022. The findings include: The as-worked schedules for the past 30 days were reviewed. On 4/2/2022, there was no documentation of an RN on duty throughout the entire day. On 4/19/2020 at 4:08 p.m. ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing, was asked to provide evidence that an RN was on duty on 4/2/2022. On 4/19/2022 at 4:17 p.m. ASM #2 presented timecard documentation for herself, that she was the RN on duty for the day. When asked if the census in the building was less than 60 residents on that day, ASM #2 stated, no. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #6, the staffing coordinator, on 4/20/2022 at 4:12 p.m. When asked how she ensures that there is an RN on duty every day, OSM #6 stated she usually has an RN each day. The schedule for 4/2/2022 was reviewed with OSM #6. OSM #6 stated, that was the weekend that (name of director of nursing) came in to be the RN on duty. ASM #1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BOWLING GREEN HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EK 2005 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LL 2013 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MZR EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SILVERSTONE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
WOOD, JANEENEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/28/2021
RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2021

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 10%Other / private 12%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$11,996per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$392per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next