No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

10701 Main Street, Fairfax, VA 22030 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (703) 273-7705 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (703) 273-7705 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 20251 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$22,957 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,957 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
10721 Main St Ste 204 · (877) 448-3627 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10721 Main St Ste 107 · (703) 592-8300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10897 Main St · (703) 934-0100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10607 Cedar Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms51.5%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.2%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.9%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.1%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.801.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 429 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.9%CMS range 43.2–52.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 7.3–11.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 6.4–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 188.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented for resident safety for (1) one of (4) four sampled residents, Resident #1, resulting in harm. Resident #1 sustained a fall during transfer resulting in a subarachnoid hemorrhage and subsequent death. The findings included:Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, unspecified dementia, end stage renal disease, arteriovenous fistula, unspecified lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/25/25, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 8 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was moderately impaired in cognition. A review of Resident #1's clinical record disclosed the following documentation: A progress note dated 1/19/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #7. The findings included:For Resident #7 the facility staff failed to identify the need for gowns as part of the required PPE (personal protective equipment) prior to entering an EBP (enhanced barrier precaution) room. Resident #7's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/21/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/4/26 at 11:00 AM, this surveyor observed an EBP sign on Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that food was served at a safe and/or appetizing temperature. The findings include: On 6/26/25 at 5:26 PM, this surveyor observed dietary staff plating food for a test-tray. The menu consisted of chef salad, tomato soup, (3) three bean salad, and a snickerdoodle cookie. The test-tray was placed on the last food cart for service. Review of the daily food temperature log revealed the temperatures of the items were as follows at start of meal service: Chef Salad (ham)-38 degrees 3 Bean Salad-37 degrees Tomato Soup-199 degrees The food cart arrived on the unit at 5:35 PM. After the resident trays were removed from the cart, the dietary manager took food temperatures from the test-tray at 5:45 PM and the temperatures were as follows: Chef Salad-59 degrees 3 Bean Salad-71 degrees Tomato Soup-169 degrees This concern was discussed at the end of day meeting on 6/26/25 at 6:04 PM with vice president of operations, regional nurse consultant #1, regional nurse consultant #2, administrator, and director of nursing. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating conditions. The findings include: On 6/24/25 at 9:39 AM, surveyor entered facility kitchen and met with dietary manager-other staff #9 (OS#9) and regional dietary manager-other staff #11(OS#11) for an initial observation/tour. During the observation this surveyor observed 3 large serving pans with water heating on the griddle area of the stove. OS#11 informed surveyor dietary staff use them to keep the food hot because the steam table is broken. One well of the steam table works, but the other wells do not. OS#11 stated the steam table has been broken for about a month and explained it is a process because the steam table has a gas line, and they have to replace the line and cut the steam table to get to the problem area. On 6/24/25 at 2:11 PM in an interview with the administrator (ADM) about the steam table not working, the ADM stated he was not aware the steam table was not working and stated the facility is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications in 1 of 1 medication rooms and on 3 of 12 medication carts and failed to properly store medications and biological's for 1 of 41 current residents, Resident #122. The findings included: The facility staff failed to properly store dialysis medications and biological's Resident #122's dialysis supplies were left outside overnight in the rain and failed to dispose of expired medications in the medication storage room and on medication carts. Resident #122's diagnoses included diabetes, muscle weakness, and end stage renal disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #122's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/15/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating Resident #122 was cognitively intact. On 06/27/25 at 8:47 a.m., during an interview with Resident #122, this resident stated to the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. For Resident #71, the facility staff documented the resident was a full code in a discharge planning note. The resident had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in place. Resident #71's diagnoses included dementia and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #71's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/15/25 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate this resident had problems with long- and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #71's comprehensive care plan included the focus area has an advance directive DNR order. Resident #71's clinical record included a provider order dated 07/05/24 indicating this resident was a DNR. The clinical record included a discharge planning note transcribed by the Social Worker dated 06/19/25 that read in part, .A copy of Advanced Directive and Resident's Rights were made available to the resident. Resident code status is Full Code . On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. For Resident #167, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the resident/resident representative being informed of and obtaining consent for the use of the psychotropic medications Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) and Mirtazapine (Remeron). Quetiapine Fumarate is an atypical antipsychotic medication, and Mirtazapine is an antidepressant medication. Resident #167's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Severe Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychosis, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/04/25 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. According to Resident #167's clinical record, they had been taking Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg 1/2 tablet one time a day at 8:00 AM and 25 mg each evening at 9:00 PM since 5/28/25. The resident had also been taking Mirtazapine 7.5 mg daily at bedtime since 5/28/25. Resident #167's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assess 2 of 41 current residents for self-administration of medications, Residents #22 and #96. The findings included: 1. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to assess the resident for self-administration of medications. Resident #22 had a bottle of Senokot gummies at the bedside. Senokot is a laxative used to treat constipation. Resident #22's diagnoses included hypothyroidism, rectal prolapse, and adult failure to thrive. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #22's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/10/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a score of 14=cognitively intact. Resident #22's comprehensive care plan included the focus area at risk for constipation. Interventions included bowel medication regimen as ordered by MD. On 06/24/25 at 1:10 p.m., the surveyor and Central Supply staff #1 entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 41 current residents Resident #122 had incontinent supplies. The findings included: Resident #122 did not have any incontinence supplies available for use. Resident #122's diagnoses included diabetes, muscle weakness, and end stage renal disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #122's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/15/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating Resident #122 was cognitively intact. Section H (bowel and bladder) had been coded with a 2 (frequently incontinent) of urine and a 3 (always incontinent) of bowel. Resident #122's comprehensive care plan included the focus area is incontinent of bladder and/or bowels. Interventions included check and change briefs frequently as needed. On 06/24/25 during the initial tour of the facility Resident #122 expressed a concern to the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide all residents with the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 41 current residents, Resident #154. The findings were: For Resident #154, the facility staff failed to provide evidence the resident was provided written information regarding the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. Resident #154's minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 04/15/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status summary score of 8 out of 15 in Section C (cognitive patterns) indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 06/25/25 after review of Resident #154's clinical record, the social worker (Other Staff #2) provided a document titled, Discharge Planning Psychosocial Assessment, page 5 of 6 only. Under #6 on the document, facility staff had highlighted the sentences, Resident does not have an AD [Advance Directive]. Per the RP [responsible party], resident did not obtain an AD in the past. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's personal privacy and confidentiality for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #166). The findings included: For Resident #166, a nurse aide discussed the resident's medical condition in the presence of another resident. Resident #166's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/07/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 6/25/25 at 9:05 AM, surveyor was speaking with a resident in their room when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 entered the room and informed the surveyor that she had a concern about the resident in room (room number omitted) having a rash that was not being treated. Resident #166 resided in the room reported by NA #1. NA #1 made this statement to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #167 and Resident #138). The findings included: 1. For Resident #167, the facility staff failed to monitor behavioral symptoms indicating the continued need for psychotropic medications. Resident #167's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Severe Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychosis, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/04/25 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #167's comprehensive person-centered care plan included focus areas stating in part the resident was at risk for adverse reactions related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare or orient residents for transfer to the hospital for 1 (one) of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #434. The findings include: For resident #434 (R434) the facility staff failed to provide evidence of preparing the resident for a transfer to the hospital on 6/19/2025. On 6/24/2025 this surveyor interviewed R434 at bedside. They stated they were readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a brief hospitalization. I had pneumonia and sepsis they said. I didn't know I was sick. The ambulance showed up to get me and took out. I guess it was a good thing though. This surveyor asked resident if the staff had explained that they were calling 911 due to a change in condition. No, I didn't know what was happening. The clinical record was reviewed. According to the demographic sheet, R434 is their own responsible party (RP). R434's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 41 residents, Residents #44 and #85. The findings included: 1. For Resident #44, the facility staff failed to code an antiplatelet medication on an annual MDS assessment and coded the MDS assessment to indicate a gradual dose reduction (GDR) had been completed in May 2025 when a GDR had not been attempted. Resident #44's diagnoses included bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #44's annual MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/06/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating Resident #44 was cognitively intact. Section N (medications) was coded to indicate this resident was currently taking an antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medication. It was not coded to indicate that the resident was receiving an antiplatelet. Section N was coded to indicate a GDR was last attempted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #3). The findings included: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan (CPCCP) following the discontinuation of a left-hand splint. Resident #3's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Vascular Dementia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, and Osteoarthritis of the Left Hand. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/28/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #3's current CPCCP included a focus area stating, Resident post CVA [cerebrovascular accident] with LUE [left upper extremity] hand and wrist Hemiplegia and Contracture with an intervention dated 5/29/18 stating in part .assess skin integrity around splint as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. For Resident #167, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with the removal of facial hair. Resident #167's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Severe Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Aphasia, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/04/25 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #167 was coded as requiring substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Resident #167's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident requires assistance with their activities of daily living. The resident's care plan did not address their desire regarding facial hair. Surveyor observed Resident #167 on 6/24/25 at 10:52 AM, 6/25/25 at 8:41 AM, and 6/25/25 at 2:30 PM and on each occasion the resident had a large amount of thick, white facial hair present on her chin. On 6/25/25 at 2:32 PM surveyor spoke with the Unit Manager (UM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow the provider orders for medication administration for 1 of 41 current residents Resident #33 and failed to follow the providers orders for treatments for 2 of 41 current residents, Residents #99 and #390. The findings included: 1. For Resident #33, the facility staff failed to administer the provider ordered medication Gabapentin. Resident #33's diagnoses included polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, and anxiety. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #33's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/29/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating this resident was cognitively intact. Resident #33's comprehensive care plan included the focus area at risk for complications related to the use of opioid secondary to neuropathy and arthritis. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Resident #33's clinical record included a provider order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to flush the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line) per the provider orders for 1 of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #433. The findings include: For resident #433 (R433) failed to flush the resident's PICC line (a device inserted into a large vein in the upper arm that is used to draw blood and give treatments, including intravenous fluids, drugs, or blood transfusions), per the provider order dated 6/21/25. R433 was a recent admission and there was no minimum data set completed yet. R433 was alert and oriented to self, time and place. On 6/24/25 at 10:30 AM, this surveyor interviewed R433 at bedside. R433 stated they were newly admitted to the facility and was there due to a wound infection on their foot. I have to be here for 6 weeks for antibiotics. This surveyor observed a PICC line in the upper left arm and there was an empty bag of intravenous ertapenem on an IV pole at the bedside. This surveyor asked if the staff were flushing the line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side/bed rail for (1) one of (41) forty-one sampled residents. (Resident #75). The findings included: For Resident #75, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of appropriate alternatives prior to the installation of a 1/8 side rail and the current side rail evaluation failed to indicate the need for a side rail. Resident #75's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Hypertension, Insomnia, Localized Swelling-Mass and Lump-Trunk, Weakness, Anxiety Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with Disturbance of Conduct, Dementia, Polyneuropathy, Congestive Heart Failure, and Depression. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 10 out of 15 for cognitive abilities indicating the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider reviewed medication regimen reviews in a timely manner and the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider acted upon and/or provided rationale of pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for (2) two of (41) forty-one sampled residents, (Resident #88 and Resident #138). The findings included: 1.For Resident #88 the facility staff failed to provide evidence of medication regimen reviews (MRRs) being reported to and acted upon by the medical provider in a timely manner. Resident #88's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Right Femur Fracture, Chronic Kidney Disease-Stage 3, History of Falls, Dementia, Depression, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Weakness, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Seizures, Hypertension, and Dysphagia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/3/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 9 out of 15 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 2 errors in 30 opportunities for a medication error rate of 6.67%. These medication errors affected Resident #59. The findings included: The facility nursing staff failed to administer the correct dosage of the medications Sertraline and B12. On 06/26/25 at 8:13 a.m., the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepare and administer Resident #59's morning medications. LPN #1 placed 1 tablet of Sertraline 25 mg and 1 tablet Vitamin B12 500 mcg in a medication cup with Resident #59's other medications and administered these medications to Resident #59. A review of Resident 59's clinical record included the following provider orders. Sertraline 25 mg give 1.5 mg tablets by mouth one time a day for depression. For a total of 37.5 mg. Cyanocobalamin tablet (B12) 500 mcg give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day for B12 deficiency. After the medication reconciliation the surveyor interviewed LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The facility staff failed to follow infection control guidelines during a medication pass and pour observation. The facility staff were observed dropping a medication on top of the medication cart, picking it up with their bare hands, and placing it into a medication cup for administration. On 06/26/25 at 8:18 a.m., during a medication pass and pour observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 this nurse was observed to drop the medication Bupropion on top of the medication cart. LPN #1 picked this medication up with her bare hands and stated you didn't see that and then put the medication in the medication cup with 3 other medications. LPN #1 placed 2 other medications in this cup. The surveyor stopped LPN #1 prior to them entering the residents room and asked the nurse about administering the contaminated medications. LPN #1 stated they were going to administer the medications they had cleaned the top of their cart. When asked about touching the medication with their bare hands LPN #1 stated what should I do. LPN #1 asked the Unit Manager LPN #9 for guidance. The Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a resident a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #3 and Resident #108). The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to discuss and/or offer the resident/resident representative a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 (PCV20) or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 21 (PCV21). A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline titled Shared Clinical Decision-Making PCV20 or PCV21 Vaccination for Adults 65 Years or Older dated 9/11/24 read in part that adults [AGE] years of age or older have the option to receive supplemental PCV20 or PCV21 (not both) if they previously completed the pneumococcal vaccine series with both PCV13 and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and meet the following criteria: Previously received one dose of PCV13 at any age, and previously received all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer an updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #3 and Resident #108. The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to offer the resident/resident representative a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. Resident #3's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Vascular Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, and History of Recurrent Pneumonia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/28/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. According to Resident #3's immunization history documented in the clinical record, the resident had previously received a COVID-19 vaccine on 10/23/23. On 6/25/25, surveyor reviewed Resident #3's clinical record and was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident interview the facility staff failed to provide a way for residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system for one of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #433. The findings include: On 6/24/2025 at 10:30 AM this surveyor interviewed resident #433 (R433). During the course of the interview, the resident stated, They don't have one of those call buttons like the hospital, I just have to wait until one of them comes in to ask for anything. This surveyor informed resident that he has to have a call light and began looking for it. The call light was attached to the bottom bedsheet below R433's knees where it could not be seen. Call light was placed with reach of #433. On 6/25/2025 at 8:20 AM this surveyor observed resident in bed with eyes closed. The call light for R433 was in the floor by the bed. On 6/25/2025 at 9:44 AM this surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #8 and the wound care Nurse Practitioner (NP) perform wound care and a skin assessment on R433. The call light was in the floor throughout the encounter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen. The findings included: The facility staff failed to discard out of date perishable food items, failed to store food preparation pans clean, failed to promptly discard unused food items, failed to utilize beard restraints for male dietary aides, and failed to ensure foods were stored at safe temperatures. On 6/24/25 at 9:39 AM, surveyor entered facility kitchen for an initial tour with dietary manager-other staff #9 (OS#9) and regional dietary manager-other staff #11 (OS#11). Surveyor observed three reach-in refrigerators in the kitchen food prep area. The thermometer on refrigerator #1 was 50 degrees, no food items were present in the refrigerator. Refrigerator #2 had a sign on the door which read, Out of Order and inside was one tray of peaches in individual bowls with no lids, one tray of pudding in individual bowls with lids, and one tray of a small salad containing cucumber slices in souffle cups with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfer or discharge for 2 of 41 residents and failed to provide the receiving entity with proper documentation upon transfer for 1 of 41 residents. (Resident #155, #138, and #434) The findings were: 1. For Resident #155, the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of the resident's discharge on [DATE]. Resident #155's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 05/19/25 was signed as completed on 05/23/25. Resident #155's brief interview for mental status summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact cognition. Resident #155's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the resident was discharged home with home health services on 06/07/25. The Discharge Instructions/Post Discharge Plan of Care - V6 document read the resident's discharge status/facility was Home. The summary/discharge arrangements read in part, Resident will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to act with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services to the facility. The findings included: The facility administration failed to operate and provide services with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services to the facility as related to an outstanding balance owed to a contracted staffing agency for services rendered from May 19, 2023, through September 29, 2023. On 6/24/25, this surveyor spoke with regional vice president of operations and requested information pertaining to a staffing agency that the facility owed an outstanding balance to over $911,000.00. On 6/25/25 at 9:15 AM regional vice president of operations informed surveyor he located a lawsuit from a staffing agency that is suing the facility. He provided surveyor with a copy of Complaint for Damages served on 6/17/25, a copy of the staffing agency/facility contract, and a copy of the outstanding balance due indicated on an invoice dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to administer medications per the physician's orders for one of _ residents in the survey sample, resident # 2 (R2). The findings included: For R2 the facility staff failed to administer scheduled Gabapentin, a medication for nerve pain for three days after admission to the center. R2s diagnosis included but were not limited to, diabetes, muscle weakness, hypertension and depression. R2s minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/20/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of possible 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed that resident had rated their pain in the last five days as height as an 8 out of 10 on the pain scale. They indicated that their pain was frequent and had interfered with sleep over the last five days. R2s Discharge Summary from the hospital was reviewed. Listed under the heading Discharge Meds the document read in part, Gabapentin (neurtontin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the medical provider orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2). The findings included: For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to administer Amlodipine and Propranolol as ordered on 10/11/24. Amlodipine and Propranolol are used to treat high blood pressure. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Essential Hypertension, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #2's current comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident was at risk for cardiac complications secondary to hypertension with an intervention to administer medications as ordered. Resident #2's current provider orders included an order dated 9/30/24 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide enteral feeding as ordered by the medical provider for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to provide an ordered bolus tube feeding. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Kidney Failure with Tubular Necrosis, End Stage Renal Disease, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, and Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/04/24 assigned the resident a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 10 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #1 was seen by Registered Dietitian (RD) #1 on 9/30/24. The assessment dated [DATE] at 10:09 AM read in part .rt [resident] reports >50 lbs. [pounds] weight loss in the past 6 months. Per transfer records, rt was on enteral nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #3). The findings included: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to administer the oral antibiotic Levofloxacin on three (3) separate occasions as ordered by the medical provider. Resident #3's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Malignant Neoplasm of the Larynx and Dysphagia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/29/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #3 was seen by the physician on 10/08/24, the progress note read in part .The patient with pneumonia in the setting of chronic respiratory failure, status post tracheostomy with a history of cancer of the larynx. Complicated case with multiple comorbidities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the required individuals related to issues affecting residents' care and/or room assignments for three (3) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #7). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to notify a medical provider of a decrease in Resident #7's urine output. The facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider was promptly notified each time Resident #7 refused their medications. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/1/24, was signed as completed on 6/14/24. Resident #7 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. On 8/21/24 at 2:06 p.m., the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant DON (ADON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical records for one (1) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #7). The findings include: The facility staff failed to document who was notified of Resident #7's refusal of medications. The facility staff failed to document the response of the medical provider when notified of Resident #7 refusing medications. The facility staff failed to document how the medical provider was notified (e.g., via telephone, face-to-face, secure messaging, etc.). Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/1/24, was signed as completed on 6/14/24. Resident #7 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. On 8/21/24 at 2:06 p.m., the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant DON (ADON), and Nurse Practitioner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement an activities care plan which addressed the findings of a resident's activity assessment for one (1) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #7). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #7's care plan addressed the desire to participate in outdoor activities. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/1/24, was signed as completed on 6/14/24. Resident #7 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #7's activities assessment, dated 9/17/23, indicated the resident reported it was 'very important' for the resident to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. The following information was found in a facility policy titled Care Planning (with an effective date of 11/1/19):…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide medications per the providers orders for 1 of 15 residents, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4, the facility staff failed to provide Zofran per the providers orders. The facility nursing staff failed to transcribe an order for Zofran making the medication unavailable for administration. Resident # 4 diagnoses included, but were not limited to, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, dependence on renal dialysis, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #4's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/20/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 13. Per the MDS manual a score of 13=cognitively intact. Resident #4's clinical record included the following progress notes. 01/13/24- .Change in condition .Resident noted vomiting on 1/15/24. States it has been occurring since 1/13/24 .Primary Care Provider responded with the following feedback .Recommendations: Zofran . This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-26 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain provider ordered X-rays for 1 of 15 Residents, Resident #5. The findings include: For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to obtain provider ordered X-rays. One of these X-rays was ordered by the provider to be completed STAT (immediate). Resident #5's diagnoses included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes, dementia, and muscle weakness. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #5's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/19/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 0. Per the MDS manual a score of 0=severe impairment. The clinical record included information to indicate this resident had a fall on 12/15/23 and on 12/16/23. On 12/15/23 the nursing staff documented resident was found in .the floor both legs pointing out to the exit door. Resident moves upper extremity and left leg without any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, homelike dining experience in one of four dining rooms. On 5/3/22, the facility staff provided lunch to residents in the fourth floor dining room without removing meal trays and trash on meal trays before the residents dined. The findings include: On 5/3/22 at 1:20 p.m., observation of staff serving 14 residents lunch in the fourth floor dining room was conducted. Staff served the meals and did not remove the trays containing the meals before the residents dined. Also, staff was observed removing plastic wrap that covered dessert bowls and plastic lids that covered some of the beverages. Staff placed the plastic wrap and plastic lids on the trays beside the meals and the trash remained on the trays while the residents dined. On 5/4/22 at 1:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1 stated all items on the food trays should be removed from the trays and the tray should be set aside out of the residents' reach. LPN #1 stated trash articles such as plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for 14 of 55 residents in the survey sample; Residents #98, #144, #50, #132, #85, #9, #97, #18, #76 #419, #52, #82, #147 and #4. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to develop the comprehensive care plan for the use of bed rails for Resident #98. Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: traumatic subdural hemorrhage, Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/1/22, coded the resident as scoring a 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor a resident's fluid intake while on a fluid restriction for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to record in April and May 2022, the amount of fluid consumed each shift by R52, who was on a physician ordered fluid restriction . The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as receiving dialysis services during the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated that the resident was on a fluid restriction ordered by his physician. R52 also stated that sometimes they were not compliant with the restriction. When asked if staff members consistently asked how much fluids R52 had consumed in a shift, R52 stated: No, almost never. A review of R52's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and service for a complete dialysis [1] program for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #97 (R97). The facility staff failed to assess R97's dialysis access site for bruit and thrill per physician order. The findings include: (R97) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease [2], dependent on renal dialysis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/05/2022, the resident scored 2 (two) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately impaired of cognition intact for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded (R97) for Dialysis while a resident. The physician's order sheet for (R97) documented in part, DIALYSIS: Hemodialysis Order set every shift Monitor AV (arterial/venous ) fistula (3) to L (left) arm Monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for 6 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #368, #144, #50, #132, #4 and #147. The findings include: 1. The facility staff implemented bed rails for Resident #368 (R368) without a recommended need and failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/26/22, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of R368's clinical record revealed a bed rail evaluation dated 4/19/22. The evaluation documented, 20. Is the use of bed rail(s) likely to increase the risk of an accident or pose as a barrier for this patient? (i.e. Is it likely that the resident might attempt to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during dinner service on 05/03/2022 with potential to affect 46 of 46 residents on the fourth floor receiving a meal tray. The findings include: On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., Resident #52 (R52) was interviewed. (R52) had multiple complaints about the temperature of food that is delivered to the room. (R52) stated the meals rarely arrive at the meal times posted on the unit, and that the food is consistently on the cold side. (R52) stated staff are too busy helping feed dependent residents to heat the food to a more palatable temperature. (R52) stated they did not want to bother staff to reheat the food, and that reheated food just is not as appealing. On 05/03/2022 at approximately 4:15 p.m., the holding temperatures of dinner meal, obtained from the service line in the kitchen were: Whole crab cakes - 171 degrees Fahrenheit Chopped crab cakes - 169 degrees Fahrenheit Pureed crab cakes - 181 degrees Fahrenheit Vegetables- 180 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain five of five dumpsters in a sanitary manner. Two outside dumpsters were observed with their door open and approximately eight pairs of used plastic gloves and numerous pieces of debris, including several pieces of cardboard and trash were found lying on the ground around and behind the facility's dumpsters. The findings include: On 05/03/2022 at approximately 12:20 p.m., an observation of the facility's dumpsters was conducted with OSM (other staff member) # 6, director of maintenance. When asked who was responsible for maintaining the dumpsters and the immediate area around the dumpsters in a clean and sanitary manner OSM # 6 stated that it was the maintenance department. The observation revealed that the facility had five trash dumpsters located toward the rear of the facility. An observation of the dumpsters revealed the sliding side doors on two of the dumpsters were fully open. Observations of the area between and behind the five dumpsters revealed a broken mop handle next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and in the course of complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to uphold a resident's dignity for two of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 76 and # 419. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to respond to Resident # 76's (R76) vocalizations/yelling. (R76) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included by not limited to: slurred speech. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/24/2022, the resident scored 3 (three) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On 05/03/22 at 1:54 p.m., auditory (hearing) observations from the hallway outside of (R76's) room revealed vocalizations/yelling coming from (R76) appeared to indicate a need for attention or assistance. Visual observation from the hallway outside of (R76's) room revealed CNA (certified nursing assistant) # 16 walking past (R76's) room while they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide accommodations of resident needs by ensuring the call bell [a device with a button that can be pushed to alert staff when assistance is needed] was within reach for one of 55 current residents in the survey sample, Resident # 76 (R76). The findings include: The facility staff failed to keep (R76's) call bell within their reach. (R76) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included by not limited to: slurred speech. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/24/2022, the resident scored 3 (three) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section G Functional Status coded (R76) as no impairment of upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand). On 05/03/22 at 1:54 p.m., an observation of (R76) in their room revealed they were sitting in wheelchair toward the foot of the bed. Observation of the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the provider (physician/nurse practitioner) when medications were not available for administration for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to notify the provider that R52's scheduled medications were not available for administration on 4/14/22, 4/24/22, and 4/26/22. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as receiving dialysis services and as receiving insulin injections during the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated that during the previous few weeks, they did not receive medications related to diabetes and to dialysis because they were not in the medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to preserve a resident's privacy during a physical examination by the nurse practitioner for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). R419 was seated in a wheelchair in full public view when the nurse practitioner (NP) performed an examination of the resident on 5/4/22. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/29/22, R419 was coded as having short term and long term memory problems, and as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. R419 was coded as requiring the extensive assistance of two staff members for transferring and moving around the unit. On 5/4/22 at 12:09 p.m., R419 was sitting in a wheelchair outside the doorway to the dining room, adjacent to the nurses' station, in full public view. ASM (administrative staff member) #7, a nurse practitioner, knelt in front of the resident. ASM #7 placed her hands on R419's ankles, lower legs, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete and electronically submit a significant change MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33 (R33). The facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment after R33 began receiving hemodialysis for chronic kidney disease stage 4 on 4/6/2022. The findings include: On the most recent MDS, an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/27/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Section O did not document R33 receiving dialysis at the time of the assessment. Review of the clinical record revealed a list of R33's MDS assessments. The list revealed an entry tracking record was completed on 2/22/2022 and an admission assessment was completed on 2/27/2022. The list failed to evidence documentation of a significant change assessment completed for R33. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete an MDS (minimum data set) for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). The facility staff failed to accurately code R419's interview status on the 3/29/22 MDS. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/29/22, R419 was coded as having short term and long term memory problems, and as being severely impaired for making daily decisions in Section C. On the 3/29/22 MDS, in section B, R419 was coded as always being understood by others, and as always understanding others for communication. However, in Section C, question C0100 documented: Should Brief Interview for Mental Status be Conducted - Attempt to conduct interview with all residents, R419 was coded as zero, meaning the resident is rarely/never understood for communication. The Brief Interview for Mental Status interview was not attempted. This section was signed by OSM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan for 1 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #369. The facility staff failed to provide a written summary of Resident #369's (R369) baseline care plan to the resident and/or the resident's representative. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/20/20, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Resident #369 was discharged from the facility on 12/28/20. A review of R369's clinical record revealed the resident's baseline care plan was initiated on 11/17/20. Further review of R369's clinical record (including progress notes and care conference notes) failed to reveal the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided a written summary of the care plan. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to correctly transcribe an order according to professional standards of practice for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to accurately transcribe R52's order for Eliquis (1), which was held on 3/28/22. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as receiving and anticoagulant on all seven days of the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated they had been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (2) during a recent hospitalization. R52 stated the physician ordered Eliquis for the atrial fibrillation. R52 stated they underwent an outpatient skin graft procedure on 3/29/22. R52 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities per a resident's assessed interest for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). The facility staff failed to provide R419 with preferred activities of watching television or listening to music by leaving the resident seated in a wheelchair at the entrance to the dining room, adjacent to the nurses' station, sleeping and eating in public view, during the day and evening on 5/3/22 and 5/4/22. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/29/22, R419 was coded as having short term and long term memory problems, and as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. R419 was coded as requiring the extensive assistance of two staff members for transferring and moving around the unit. On the following dates and times, R419 was sitting in a wheelchair outside the dining room, adjacent to the nurse station. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have medications available for administration to the resident in a timely manner for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to have R52's scheduled medications available for administration on 4/14/22, 4/24/22, and 4/26/22. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as receiving dialysis services and as receiving insulin injections during the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated that during the previous few weeks, the resident did not receive medications related to diabetes and to dialysis because they were not in the medication cart for the nurse to administer. A review of R52's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure one of 55 residents in the survey sample Resident #52 (R52) was free from a significant medication error. The facility staff failed to administer Eliquis (1) as ordered after the hold period related to a procedure ended. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as receiving and anticoagulant on all seven days of the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated they had been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (2) during a recent hospitalization. R52 stated the physician ordered Eliquis for the atrial fibrillation. R52 stated they underwent an outpatient skin graft procedure on 3/29/22. R52 stated the physician wanted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food per the dietician's recommendation, and failed to serve food that matched the published menu for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). At lunch on 5/3/22 and 5/4/22, R52 did not receive double portions per the dietician's recommendation; R52's food items did not match the published menu and meal ticket. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/14/22, R52 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions. R52 was coded as being on a therapeutic diet, and as receiving dialysis services during the look back period. On 5/3/22 at 1:38 p.m., Resident #52 (R52) was interviewed. R52 had multiple complaints about food served to him. R52 stated the dietary staff consistently failed to provide double portions, as recommended by the dietician. R52 stated the food on the meal tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide written information to concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive by ensuring an accurate durable do not resuscitate (DDNR) form for two of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 11 and Resident # 35. The findings include 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that the DDNR form for Resident # 11 was filled out correctly. The DDNR form for Resident # 11 reflected that Resident # 11 had an advanced directive when she did not have an advanced directive in place. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. On 10/22/19 at 2:39 pm, the surveyor reviewed the DDNR form for Resident # 11. The surveyor observed a handwritten x next to the statement While capable of making an informed decision, the patient has executed a written advanced directive which appoints a Person Authorized to Consent on the Patient's Behalf with authority to direct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 42 residents, Resident #87 and Resident #360. The findings included: 1. For Resident #87 the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for behaviors. Resident #87's face sheet listed an admission date of 08/20/14 and a readmission date of 05/10/17. The resident's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included but not limited to Parkinson's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, depression, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, and hypertension. Resident #87's most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/12/19 assigned the Resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns, indicating the resident is cognitively intact. Section E, behavior, coded the resident as not having any indicators of psychosis, nor any behavioral symptoms. Subsection E0800 coded the resident as not exhibiting any rejection of care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide care and treatment based on the comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 42 residents, Resident #117. The findings included: For Resident #117 the facility staff failed to follow physician's order for the use of a resting hand splint. Resident #117's face sheet list an admission date of 02/07/16 and a readmission date of 11/16/18. The diagnosis list includes diagnoses of, but not limited to dementia, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, and cognitive communication deficit. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/19 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 9 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Section G, functional status, coded the resident as having functional limited range of motion on one side of both upper and lower extremities. Resident #117's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for 'Splint r/t (related to) contracture.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-27 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to have readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents of the facility, the results of the most recent survey(s) and failed to post a notice of the availability of such reports in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. The findings included: The facility staff failed to post the results of the most recent survey(s) and failed to post notice of their availability. On 06/26/25 at 4:10 p.m., the surveyor and the Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO) attempted to locate the survey results in the lobby of the facility and/or a notice of the availability of the surveys. The RVPO confirmed to the surveyor they were unable to locate the survey results. The issue with the missing survey results were reviewed with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Nurse Consultant #1 and #2, and the RVPO at the end of the day meeting on 06/26/25 at 6:05 p.m. No further information regarding this issue was provided to the survey team prior to the exit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,957 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
  • $12,599 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VIRGINIA CARE HOLCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/31/2020
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
ISVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
JKVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
MLVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/31/2020
RAJCHENBACH, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2020
INNOVATIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/31/2020
VORPAHL, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/12/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$31.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 16%Other / private 19%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$452per resident / day
operating cost
$13,740per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$464per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495099. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next