Lexington Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 97.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, nurse practitioner (NP), and Physician interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician or the nurse practitioner that an anti-seizure medication (lacosamide) was not available for administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change (Resident #244). The facility failed to notify the NP or the Physician that lacosamide was not available for administration on 4/30/2022, 5/1/2022, 5/4/2022, 5/8/2022, 5/24/2022, and 5/26/2022. Resident #244 was hospitalized with cardiac issues on 5/11/2022 and with seizure activity on 5/27/2022. Findings included: Resident #244 was admitted to the facility 4/27/2022 at 11:45 PM with diagnoses to include stroke, seizures, and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #244 to be severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident #244 had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for feeding and medications. The MDS documented Resident #244 had seizure disorder. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2022-10-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Physician interviews, the facility failed to administer an anti-seizure medication (lacosamide) as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #244). Resident #244 missed 34 doses of lacosamide. The facility failed to administer lacosamide on 4/28/2022 to 4/30/2022, 5/1 to 5/11/2022; 5/23 to 5/27/2022. Resident #244 was sent to the emergency room from a physician appointment on 5//11/2022 with cardiac issues (and admitted for treatment) and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation after seizure activity on 5/27/2022. Findings included: Resident #244 was admitted to the facility 4/27/2022 at 11:45 PM with diagnoses to include stroke, seizures, and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #244 to be severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident #244 had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for feeding and medications. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to report reasonable suspicion of a crime to law enforcement when Resident #1 was identified with an odor of marijuana after he returned inside the facility from the smoking area. A subsequent drug screen was completed and the resident tested positive for Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC [the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana] ). This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). The findings included:Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Substance Use with a date of 01/29/24, states to protect the health and safety of resident, the center prohibits unprescribed use of drugs and alcohol. The policy indicated if items were found that posed a health and safety risk they were to be confiscated if in plain sight and law enforcement was to be contacted. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete smoking assessments when a resident was identified as a smoker and to provide supervision and retain smoking materials in accordance with the smoking policy for a resident assessed as a supervised smoker for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1).The findings included:Review of the policy titled Patient Smoking dated 01/29/24 indicated if supervision was deemed necessary, the resident would be supervised by staff or other appropriate person (i.e., family member). Residents who wished to smoke would be evaluated using the Smoking Safety Screen Assessment upon admission and as needed to determine need for supervision. The facility would maintain all smoking paraphernalia for residents who required supervision with smoking. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of tobacco use. Resident #1's care plan with a date of 04/12/25 revealed the resident preferred to smoke. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Pharmacist, and Physician the facility failed to ensure a nurse accurately measured a liquid narcotic medication per professional standards of practice resulting in a wrong administration dose. This was for 1 of 3 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #1). The findings included:Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a hospital discharge summary revealed that prior to Resident # 1's facility residency he had been hospitalized from [DATE] to 9/2/25. The resident was diagnosed with pulmonary nodules, a large chest mass with evidence of metastatic disease to multiple areas in his bones along with enlarged lymph nodes. Additionally, Resident # 1 had diagnoses of heart failure with a decreased ejection fraction (percent of blood flow the heart pumps with each heart beat), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, hypertension, and seizure disorder. Resident # 1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete regarding medication orders given by a Nurse Practitioner and documentation of the administration of medications. This was for 1 of 3 of three sampled residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident # 1).The findings included: Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of metastatic lung cancer disease.Review of a Nurse Practitioner's (NP) progress note for the date of 10/3/25 revealed the NP had ordered some medications when the resident was not responding. According to the NP's note she ordered two doses of Narcan and one dose of Lasix which were administered to the resident.Review of Resident # 1's orders revealed these orders were never entered into the resident's electronic record. Review of Resident # 1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed no documentation when these medications were given. They did not appear on the MAR. Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident, family member, neighbor and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from exploitation. In [DATE], Nurse Aide (NA) #1 told Resident #1 that her landlord raised the rent at her apartment and she was going to be evicted. Resident #1 reported that NA #1 asked to live in his personal home and being a goodhearted trusting person, he was considering letting NA #1 and her friend house-sit his personal home while he was at the facility. NA #1 asked the resident if she could look at his house and he informed her where the keys were located. NA #1 went to the resident's home and due to being unable to find the keys she went to Resident #1's neighbor's home to request a key at which time the neighbor did not give her the key preventing NA #1 from entering the home and having access to all of Resident #1's personal belongings. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation misappropriation of property/exploitation to Adult Protective Services (APS) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, misappropriation of property and/or exploitation (Resident #1).Findings included:The Facility's Reporting Requirements/Investigations policy statement dated effective 2/5/2023 indicated the Administrator will immediately notify the adult protective services agency for any incident of patient abuse, mistreatment, neglect or misappropriation of personal property or other reasonable suspicion of a crime. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].An initial allegation report dated 7/10/2025 at 2:13 pm was completed by the former Administrator and faxed to the State Agency alleging misappropriation of Resident #1's property on 7/9/2025. The initial report recorded the facility became aware of the incident on 7/10/2025 at 10:45am. Details of the allegation stated NA #1 convinced Resident #1 to allow her to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with staff, resident and Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to: 1) provide oxygen at the rate ordered by the physician: provide clean air intake filters on oxygen concentrators for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #79); 2) post oxygen signs for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #10, Resident #13, and Resident #33); 3) change oxygen tubing for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #33); and 4) obtain physician's order for oxygen delivery for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #250) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: 1. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of respiratory failure, pneumonia, and stroke. A Physician's Order dated 3/24/2025 indicated Resident #79 should receive 2 liters per minute oxygen by nasal cannula. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #79 was cognitively intact and required oxygen therapy. The 10-liter Oxygen Concentrator Guide stated the air filter should be cleaned at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow residents who were assessed to be safe smokers to smoke independently per their individual preference for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #8 and #249) reviewed for smoking. The findings included: Review of the Facility Smoking Acknowledgement read, in part: patients who wish to smoke will be evaluated using the smoking safety screen upon admission and as needed to determine need for supervision. The patient must also agree to the policy and sign the Patient Smoking Acknowledgement form . based on the Smoking Safety Screen, a patient may smoke in designated smoking area either independently or with supervision . The smoking schedule for the facility dated 3/18/25 was reviewed. Times for smoking were listed as 8:30 AM, 11:00 AM, 1:30 PM, 3:30 PM, 5:30 PM, and 8:00 PM. The form read Staff members go with residents out back to designated smoking areas. Ensure the resident is in proper clothing and has shoes or foot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to resolve grievances that were reported in the Resident Council meetings for 4 of 6 months (11/19/2024, 12/18/2024, 1/29/2025 and 2/26/2025). Findings included: A review of the Resident Council Minutes indicated the residents had complained on 11/19/2024, 12/18/2024, 1/29/2025, and 2/26/2025, during the Resident Council meeting, that they received potatoes and green beans several times during the same week. A Departmental Response/Resolution dated 11/26/2024 indicated the facility's menu was provided by the corporate office and the Dietary Manager stated the menu could not be changed. The Department Response/Resolution also stated green beans were served three times a week and mashed potatoes were served two times a week per the facility's menu. On 12/18/2024 the Departmental Response/Resolution form updated by the Administrator stated they continued to report the residents' concerns to the Dietary Manager to see if any substitutions could be made. On 1/29/2025 the Departmental Response/Resolution form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to completely fill out the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for 1 of 2 residents reviewed and Advanced Directives (Resident # 30). The findings included: Resident # 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 30's diagnosis included hypertension, and cognitive impairment. Review of Resident # 30's paper medical record revealed Resident # 30's DNR form signed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) # 1 was not dated. Review of Resident # 30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician's order dated 1/21/2025 for code status DNR. An interview was conducted on 4/14/2025 at 1:05 PM with Unit Manager # 2. Unit Manager # 2 revealed upon admission, the nurse would complete the DNR. Unit Manager # 2 continued by stating the form would then go to the Nurse Practitioner (NP) to be signed, dated, and then scanned into the EMR. The hard copy would be kept at the nurse's station in a binder. Unit Manager # 2 further stated the DNR form should correspond…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC