Norfolk Health Care Center
901 East Princess Anne Road, Norfolk, VA 23504 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (757) 626-1642 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $102,245 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-24)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 5 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 57.1% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.2% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 14.2% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.5% | 73.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.3% | 22.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.04 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 39.6–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.0–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 86.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.3–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 166.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Facility documentation reviews, and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure competent Professional nursing staff oversight, assessment, and administration of tracheostomy care for three residents (Resident #185, #186, and #190) in a survey sample of 60 Residents, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy. After accepting the plan to remove the immediacy from the Administrator and confirming that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, the deficiency was assigned a Scope and Severity level of 3 (G), isolated (harm).The findings included: 1. Resident #185 was initially admitted to the nursing facility on 7-7-25 with diagnoses including stroke, respiratory failure with tracheostomy for breathing, dysphagia with gastrostomy tube for feeding, anemia, diabetes, stage 4 pressure ulcer, and malnutrition. Review of hospital records revealed that the Resident was sent back out to the hospital 6 days after admission on [DATE] with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policies for one Resident (Resident #1) of 2 residents in the survey sample.The findings included:The facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy and report an unusual occurrence that resulted in a missing person report being filed for Resident #1, who a Certified Nursing Assistant/Aide (CNA B) was not trained on LOA (leave of absence) permitted Resident #1 to leave the facility for approximately 3 days without family or nursing staff knowledge. The Resident was returned by his daughter/power of attorney (POA) approximately 72 hours after his departure with a cousin.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stroke, hypertension, chronic systolic heart failure, left sided hemiparesis, and aphasia. The Resident's face sheet listed the Resident's daughter as his POA for financial and medical decision making. The Document was not derived until 3-10-26 upon his return to the facility. Prior to that he was his own decision maker. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, Resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain competency necessary to care for resident needs in Nursing Aide proficiency related to leaves of absence (LOA) for one Resident (Resident #1) of 2 Residents in the survey sample. The findings included:Certified Nursing Assistant/Aide (CNA B) was found to have not been trained on LOA which she provided to Resident #1 resulting in him leaving the facility for approximately 3 days without family or nursing staff knowledge. The Resident was returned by his daughter/power of attorney (POA) approximately 72 hours after his departure with a cousin.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stroke, hypertension, chronic systolic heart failure, left sided hemiparesis, and aphasia. The Resident's face sheet listed the Resident's daughter as his POA for financial and medical decision making. The Document was not derived until 3-10-26 upon his return to the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 28 residents (Residents #108, #107, and #124) in the survey sample had meals served that followed the menu and meal tickets. The findings included: 1. The facility's staff failed to serve food items according to the menu and meal ticket. Resident #108 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included stroke, renal failure, and heart failure. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/13/25, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #108's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were moderately impaired. In section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals), the resident was coded as requiring setup or clean-up assistance with eating, dependent with oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide needed durable medical equipment and home health services in a timely manner for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #115), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #115 was no longer a resident of the facility; therefore, a closed record review was conducted. Resident #115 was originally admitted to the facility 10/29/25. The diagnoses included; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, morbid obesity due to excess calories, end stage renal disease, and muscle weakness. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/27/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #115's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact.On 1/13/26 at 12:08 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #115. Resident #115 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 4 of 28 residents (Residents #124, #122, #108, and #107) in the survey sample received fluids as listed on the menu, per their preferences, or as ordered. The findings included: 1.The facility staff failed to serve a beverage listed on the menu. Resident #124 was originally admitted to the facility 3/03/17 from an acute care facility and re-admitted on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; Dysphagia, Mechanically Altered PO Intake and Cerebral Palsy. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/03/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #124 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) the resident was coded as using suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure an enhanced barrier precaution sign was posted for 1 resident to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 28 residents (Resident # 117), in the survey sample.The findings include: Resident #117 was originally admitted to the facility 10/23/25 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Tracheostomy Status. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/17/25 coded the resident as having short-term memory loss which indicated Resident #117 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. Section K (Swallowing/Nutritional Status) coded the resident as having a Feeding Tube. A review of the Physician's order Summary for December 2025 read Enhanced Precaution r/t Trach every shift. Active from 11/04/25. On 1/13/26 and during the initial tour of the facility at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for all.The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment in the 200-unit. On 1/12/25, it took 12 minutes from the time the call button was activated until the elevator arrived at the front lobby. Upon arriving at the 200's unit on 1/12/24 at approximately 3:30 PM, the lower numeral corridor was observed to be littered with debris on the floor, had many dark spots on the floor that appeared to be uncleaned spills, and the corridor was cluttered with various medical equipment. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor was simply dirty, the trash can was without a liner, and a used glove was observed on the floor. The A bed resident had mats at the bedside with holes and a dark substance on them. Under the head of the bed, the floor space was filled with broken, useless items, a wheelchair leg rest, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 28 residents (Residents #108, #107, and #124) in the survey sample received fluids as listed on the menu, per their preferences, or as ordered. The findings included: 3.The facility staff failed to serve a beverage listed on the menu. Resident #124 was originally admitted to the facility 3/03/17 from an acute care facility and re-admitted on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; Dysphagia, Mechanically Altered PO Intake and Cerebral Palsy. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/03/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #124 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) the resident was coded as using suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide needed durable medical equipment and home health services in a timely manner for 1 of 28 residents (Resident #115), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #115 was no longer a resident of the facility; therefore, a closed record review was conducted. Resident #115 was originally admitted to the facility 10/29/25. The diagnoses included; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, morbid obesity due to excess calories, end stage renal disease, and muscle weakness. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/27/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #115's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact.On 1/13/26 at 12:08 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #115. Resident #115 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 28 residents (Residents #124, #108, and #107) in the survey sample had meals served in accordance with the menu and meal tickets. The findings included: 1.The facility staff failed to serve portion of food listed on the menu. Resident #124 was originally admitted to the facility 3/03/17 from an acute care facility and re-admitted on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; Dysphagia, Mechanically Altered PO Intake and Cerebral Palsy. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/03/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #124 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) the resident was coded as using suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure an enhanced barrier precaution sign was posted for 1 resident to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 28 residents (Resident # 117), in the survey sample.The findings included: Resident #117 was originally admitted to the facility 10/23/25 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Tracheostomy Status. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/17/25 coded the resident as having short-term memory loss which indicated Resident #117 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. Section K (Swallowing/Nutritional Status) coded the resident as having a Feeding Tube. A review of the Physician's order Summary for December 2025 read Enhanced Precaution r/t Trach every shift. Active from 11/04/25. On 1/13/26 and during the initial tour of the facility at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for all.The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment in the 200-unit. On 1/12/25, it took 12 minutes from the time the call button was activated until the elevator arrived at the front lobby. Upon arriving at the 200's unit on 1/12/24 at approximately 3:30 PM, the lower numeral corridor was observed to be littered with debris on the floor, had many dark spots on the floor that appeared to be uncleaned spills, and the corridor was cluttered with various medical equipment. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor was simply dirty, the trash can was without a liner, and a used glove was observed on the floor. The A bed resident had mats at the bedside with holes and a dark substance on them. Under the head of the bed, the floor space was filled with broken, useless items, a wheelchair leg rest, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to provide timely incontinence care after each episode for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included hypertension (HTN), congestive heart failure (CHF), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Arthritis, and Anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/10/24 coded Resident #1 as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15, indicating Resident #1 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section H(Bladder and Bowels) Resident #1 was coded as always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowels. In section M(Skin Conditions) the resident was noted to be at risk for pressure ulcers and received ointment application to skin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on general observations of the facility, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Roaches were identified during the survey and recorded sightings by staff on all four floors (three resident units and first floor kitchen and common areas). The findings included: The pest sighting log sheets on all four floors identified roaches. Specifically, a review of the last 6 months on the first floor revealed roaches inside the dietary food cart, baseboard dish room, food tray and activities depart. A review of the last 6 months on the second floor revealed roaches in general areas, room [ROOM NUMBER], 227, soiled utility room and roaches everywhere in hallway. A review of the last 6 months on the third floor revealed roaches in room [ROOM NUMBER], 302, 303, 304, 307, 312, 314, 321, 324, 325, 327 and 331 identified by residents and staff. A review of the last 6 months on the fourth floor revealed roaches on the walls, ceiling, floor and hallways and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 56 residents (Resident #71, Resident #141 and Resident #129) in the survey sample received a complete and accurate assessment. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/19/21 under Section P for the use of Restraints and Alarms was coded correctly for Resident #71. Resident #71 was admitted to the nursing facility on 11/29/16. Diagnosis for Resident #71 included but not limited to muscle weakness. Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/19/21 coded Resident #71's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored an 11 out of a possible score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #71 total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, transfer, toilet use and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure 8 of 56 (Residents #119, #239, #114, #106, #129, #126, #60 #22) residents grooming and personal hygiene needs were met. The findings included: 1. Resident #119 was admitted to the nursing facility on 6/14/21 with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of the vertebra, lumbar region and on intravenous antibiotics. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an admission dated 6/20/21 and coded Resident #119 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact in the skills for daily decision making. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance of two staff for bathing/showers. The resident was coded only able to stabilize himself with staff assistance. Resident #119 had no impairment in upper extremities, but possessed impairment in bilateral lower extremities. On 7/13/21 at 11:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #442 received Gabapentin medication as ordered. The findings included: Resident #442 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #442 was discharged to the hospital on 3/26/2021 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #442 was discharged to the hospital on 5/8/2021. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #442's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/08/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #442 as requiring supervision with setup help only for eating, extensive assistance of 1 with dressing and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 2 with bed mobility, total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on information obtained during the Resident Council Meeting, and interviews, the facility staff failed to inform residents of where State licensing Agency contact information was posted to include email, addresses and phone numbers. The findings included: A resident council meeting was held in the resident dining hall on 7/14/21 at approximately, 11:00 AM. Five residents attended the meeting. The residents were not aware of how to obtain or utilize the Long-Term Care Ombudsman's contact information or other advocacy agencies. They also was not aware of where the signage was located. On 7/14/21 at approximately 11:48 AM an interview was conducted with the Activity Director (OSM/Other Staff Member #4) regarding the residents in the Resident Council Meeting stating they didn't know where to find the Ombudsman contact information. The Activity Director stated, They say the same thing every year. We go over who's the ombudsman. We have gone over it several times. The above findings were shared with the Director of Nursing and the Corporate Nurse on 7/15/21 at approximately 2:19 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #121, was provided an opportunity to formulate an advanced directive. The findings included: Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #121 included but are not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy and Anxiety Disorder. Resident #121's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/23/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #121 as requiring extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and dressing, total dependence of 1 with toilet use and independent with setup help only for eating and personal hygiene. On 07/14/2021 review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide one resident (Resident #189) in the survey sample of 56 residents with documentation of a comprehensive care plan goals during discharge/transfer to a hospital. The findings included: Resident #189 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, benign neoplasm of pituitary gland, cannabis abuse, obstructive sleep apnea, renal dialysis, mental disorder and hypertension. The facility staff failed to provide documentation of a comprehensive care plan goals when transferred/discharged to the hospital. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns Basic Information for Mental Status (BIMS) as a level 15. In the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) this resident was coded as a 2/2 for mobility, requiring one person assist. In the area of Transfer this resident was coded as 2/3, requiring a two person physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of hospital discharges for 2 of 56 residents (Resident #60 and Resident #189) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #60's transfer and admission to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #60 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 07/09/19. Diagnosis for Resident #60 included but not limited Type II Diabetes. Resident #60's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/18/21 coded Resident #60's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 15 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 05/10/21 - discharged with return anticipated. On 5/10/21, according to the facility's documentation, Resident #60…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide one resident (Resident #189) in the survey sample of 56 residents with a notice of Bed Hold Policy before being transferred to the hospital. The findings included: Resident #189 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, benign neoplasm of pituitary gland, cannabis abuse, obstructive sleep apnea, renal dialysis, mental disorder and hypertension. The facility staff failed to provide a notice of the facility's Bed Hold Policy prior to being transferred to the hospital. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns Basic Information for Mental Status (BIMS) as a level 15. In the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) this resident was coded as a 2/2 for mobility, requiring one person assist. In the area of Transfer this resident was coded as 2/3, requiring a two person physical assist. In the area of Dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to include use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 56 residents (Resident #126), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #126 was originally admitted to the facility 6/17/21 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; renal and perinephric abscesses and ureteral calculous obstruction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/23/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #126 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section H0100 of the MDS assessment the resident was coded for utilizing an indwelling catheter. During the initial tour on 7/13/21, Resident #126 was observed with a catheter drainage bag attached to the bedframe. Resident #126 stated he was hospitalized for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to obtain a physician's order for use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 56 residents (Resident #126), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #126 was originally admitted to the facility 6/17/21 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; renal and perinephric abscesses and ureteral calculous obstruction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/23/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #126 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section H0100 of the MDS assessment the resident was coded for utilizing an indwelling catheter. During the initial tour on 7/13/21, Resident #126 was observed with a catheter drainage bag attached to the bedframe. Resident #126 stated he was hospitalized for what he thought was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to prevent/reduce complications while utilizing an indwelling catheter for 1 of 56 residents (Resident #114), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #114 was originally admitted to the facility 6/9/21 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; obstructive uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary retention. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/15/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #114 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section H0100 of the MDS assessment the resident was coded for utilizing an indwelling catheter. During rounds on 7/13/21 at approximately 11:25 a.m., Resident #114 stated he had experienced kidney problems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on information obtained during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The facility staff failed to staff a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 10/7/17, 10/21/17 and 10/22/17. This affects all residents. The findings included: During the nursing staff review for September 1, 2017 through May 8, 2019 the facility staff was unable to verify RN presence in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours on 10/7/17, 10/21/17 and 10/22/17, therefore; further verification was requested. On 5/9/19 at approximately 5:00 p.m., the Corporate Consultant stated they were unable to present any information verifying a RN was present in the facility for 8 consecutive hours on 10/7/17, 10/21/17 and 10/22/17. The above findings were shared with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and the Corporate Consultant on 5/9/19 at approximately 5:10 p.m., the Corporate Consultant stated they didn't want to address the concern any further. The facility's policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-09 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to send a copy of the Resident's Care Plan to include their care plan goals after being discharged /transferred to the hospital for 3 of 60 residents (Resident #52, 51 and 3) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to send Resident #52's Care Plan Summary to include goals when discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. 2a. The facility staff failed to convey to the receiving provider Resident #51's comprehensive care plan goals at the time of discharge to the local hospital on [DATE]. 2b. The facility staff failed to convey to the receiving provider Resident #51's comprehensive care plan goals at the time of discharge to the local hospital on 2/7/19. 3. Facility staff failed to evidence that all the required documentation; care plan goals were sent with the resident at the time of a facility-initiated transfer for Resident #3. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to send Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-09 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed send a copy of the Bed-Hold Policy for 5 of 60 residents (Resident #52, 79, 51, 55 and 3) after being transferred to and admitted to the hospital. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #52 was provided a written copy of the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer/discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #79 with a written notice of the facility's Bed-Hold Policy upon transfer to the hospital 4/17/19. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #51 or Resident Representative (RR) was issued a written notice of the bed hold reserve policy upon transfer to the local hospital on [DATE] and 2/7/19. 4. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #55 received a written notice of the facility Bed-Hold policy upon transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. 5. For Resident #3, facility staff failed to evidence that written bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to dispose of controlled medications in a secure and safe method to prevent diversion and/or accidental exposure upon inspection of 1 out of 3 medication carts. The findings include: On 5/8/19 at 11:20 a.m., during inspection of a medication cart, the narcotic count for *oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) was short 1 tablet. Upon inspection with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 the count was 9 tablets of oxycodone, but the narcotic sign out sheet recorded 10 on 5/8/19 at 9:00 a.m. LPN #7 stated she dropped the tablet and was going to have (name of Assistant Director of Nursing) waste the tablet with her. She did not respond when asked what she did with the oxycodone tablet. *Oxycodone, a class II narcotic, is a semisynthetic derivative of codeine that acts as a narcotic analgesic more potent and addicting than codeine. (https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00497) On 5/8/19 at 11:30 a.m., the ADON stated she did not know about LPN #7 dropping the narcotic, but she could have asked any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on information obtained during the Resident Council Meeting, observations and interviews, the facility staff failed to respond to ongoing resident issues. The findings included: The Surveyor received 6 months of resident council meeting minutes from the Activity Director. The following were ongoing concerns for six months: On 12/11/18 Residents complained of (c/o) call bells not being answered. On 11/13/18 Residents c/o cold foods, and call bells not being answered. On 1/08/19 Residents c/o cold foods, and call bells not being answered. On 2/12/19 Residents c/o cold foods, and call bells not being answered. On 3/12/19 call bells not being answered. On 4/9/19 ongoing issues, cold foods, call bells not being answered and not getting snacks. On 05/08/19 at approximately 1:14 PM a Resident Council meeting was held in the Resident dining room at the facility. There were eleven Resident's present. An interview was conducted with the residents. The following questions were asked concerning grievances. 1. Does the Grievance Official respond to the resident or the family groups? The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of hospital discharges for 1 of 60 residents (Resident #52) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #52's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. The findings included: Resident #52 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #52 included but not limited to Cardiomyopathy. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/01/19 coded Resident #52 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 99 indicating short and long-term memory problems and with severe cognitive impairment - never/rarely made decisions. The Discharge MDS assessments dated 03/20/19 - discharge return anticipated, resident readmitted on [DATE]. On 03/20/19 at approximately 5:54 a.m., according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 60 residents (Resident #92), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to code hearing and vision loss in section B0200 and B1000 and hospice services in section O0100K2 of Resident #92's 4/1/19 quarterly MDS assessment. The findings included; Resident #92 was admitted to the facility 12/1/15 and was discharged from the facility to a local acute care hospital 6/22/18 and returned 6/25/18. The current diagnoses include; legal blindness, bilateral hearing loss and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/1/19 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Assessment dated 9/15/16 read; at #7. Each person entering data into the MDS will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the baseline care plan summary was provided for 1 out of 60 residents (Resident #453) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to issue a newly admitted resident, (Resident #453), a copy of the care plan summary. The summary must include the initial goals for the resident, a list of current medications and dietary instructions and services and treatments to be administered by the facility. The findings included: Resident #453 was admitted to the nursing facility on 05/03/19. Resident #453 diagnosis included but not limited to Pulmonary Fibrosis, hypoxia, Anxiety and Congestive Heart Failure. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. During the initial on 05/07/19 at approximately 12:07 p.m. Resident #453 was asked if she received a written care plan summary and if so did anyone explain the summary to her. She said as far as I know, no one has given me anything. The resident stated, I came here from the hospital but no one has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #31. Facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan and ensure Resident #31's environment was free from fall hazards. The findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease (1), schizophrenia, and muscle weakness. Resident #31's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/22/19. Resident #31 was coded as being cognitively intact in the ability to make daily decisions scoring 14 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #31 was coded in section G (Functional Status) as being able to walk independently in his room. On 5/9/19 at 10:00 a.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to assure the person centered plan of care was revised as the resident's status changed for 1 of 60 residents, (Resident #79) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #79's care plan after a fall to reduce the likelihood of another fall. The findings included; Resident #79 was originally admitted to the facility 10/11/13, and was readmitted to the facility 4/22/19, after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; stroke with left hemiparesis, and seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/23/19, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of 15. This indicated Resident #79's daily decision making abilities were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, transfers, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to provide care and services to maintain the resident's highest physical well-being for 1 of 60 residents (Resident #92), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to follow the physician's order dated 6/29/18 and the person centered-care plan for, no weights for Resident #92. The findings included: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility 12/1/15 and was discharged from the facility to a local acute care hospital 6/22/18 and returned 6/25/18. The current diagnoses include; legal blindness, bilateral hearing loss and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/1/19 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. In section G (physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care with bathing, personal hygiene, and toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to provide fingernail care for Resident #74, prior to his fingernails becoming long and with broken sharp edges. Resident #74 was originally admitted to the facility 11/24/17 and has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; stroke, difficulty speaking, and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/22/19, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of 15. This indicated Resident #74's daily decision making abilities were severely impaired. The resident was coded in section G (Physical functioning) as requiring total care of one with bathing and off unit locomotion, extensive assistance of 2 people with transfers and extensive assistance of one with eating, toileting, bed mobility, on unit locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #74 was observed seated in the dining room awaiting the lunch meal. His fingernails were observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to provide an environment which is free from accident hazards and elopement by implementing interventions and supervision for 3 of 60 resident in the survey sample, (Resident #79, 553 and 31). 1. The facility staff failed to identify Resident #79's inability to hold her leg/foot up for prolonged periods while being propelled in a wheel chair; which resulted in an avoidable fall. 2. The facility staff failed to provide necessary supervision to Resident #553 to prevent elopement from the facility. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #31's bathroom was free from fall hazards. The findings included; 1. The facility staff failed to identify Resident #79's inability to hold her leg/foot up for prolonged periods while being propelled in a wheel chair; which resulted in an avoidable fall. Resident #79 was originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide 1 of 60 residents (Resident #453) in the survey sample with Respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #453's oxygen order contained a prescribed flow rate to be administered. The findings included: Resident #453 was admitted to the nursing facility on 05/03/19. Resident #453 diagnosis included but not limited to Pulmonary Fibrosis, hypoxia, Anxiety and Congestive Heart Failure. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Resident #453's Interim care plan documented resident on oxygen therapy related to respiratory distress. The goal: Resident will have no signs of distress or poor oxygen absorption. Some of the intervention/approaches to manage goal included but not limited to give medications as ordered by physician and monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to physician as needed. During the initial on 05/07/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the Hospice policy; the facility staff failed to integrate the Hospice Agency's written agreement describing the responsibilities between the hospice agency and the nursing home for 1 of 60 residents (Resident #92), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency's coordinated plan of care for Resident #92, to identify which services the Hospice Agency would provide, when the services would be provided, the communication process, and when or why the nursing facility staff should notify the Hospice Agency was integrated with the facility's care plan. The findings included: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility 12/1/15 and was discharged from the facility to a local acute care hospital 6/22/18 and returned 6/25/18. The current diagnoses include; legal blindness, bilateral hearing loss and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/1/19 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure infection control measures were provided during wound care and the facility staff failed to conduct a risk assessment to reduce the risk of Legionella on 1 residents. (Resident #55) of 60 residents in the survey sample. For Resident #55, the facility staff failed to place a barrier under the Resident's Right Lower Extremity (right heel) while providing wound care and to sanitize equipment used in wound care (scissors and bedside table). The findings included: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #55 included but not limited to Pressure Ulcer of Unspecified, Pressure Ulcer of Right Hip, and Major Depressive Disorder. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a discharged assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/19. Staff assessment of mental status coded the resident as having short term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-08-17 · tag F0309 — patternProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services to promote and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 2 of 25 residents in the survey sample (Residents #2 and #6). 1. The facility failed to obtain a Physician Order to cleanse a traumatic wound with Normal Saline and to apply a clean dressing for Resident #2. 2. The facility staff failed to identify two staples remaining in Resident #6's healed surgical sacral suture line. The Findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included but not limited to Non Alzheimer's Dementia and Traumatic open wound to the Right heel. Resident #2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/17, coded Resident #2 with a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-08-17 · tag F0333 — patternEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation the facility staff failed to administer two (2) significant medications for 1 out of 25 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #20). The facility staff failed to transcribe and administer 3 doses of Clonidine (1) and 7 doses of Methyldopa (2) (Hypertensive medications) as ordered by the cardiologist. The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #20 included but not limited to Hypertension (3). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a comprehensive assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/23/17 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #20 for being independent with no assistance required for all ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) except eating requiring set-up help only. Resident was also coded as being continent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-08-17 · tag F0371 — patternStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain the proper food temperature at one of 3 nursing units. The facility staff failed to maintain the proper temperature for hot foods at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above at one of the nursing units, Unit 2. The findings included: During a Group Interview conducted on 08/16/17 at 10:00 AM with 11 cognitive residents, 6 residents out of the group stated the hot food was never hot because the food carts will sit on the floor about 15-20 minutes, if not longer, before the CNAs (Certified Nurse Aide) come to pass out the trays. Three (3) of the residents stated, I come from the 3rd unit and they won't even take the time to use the steam tables. On 8/16/17 at 11:50 AM, food temperatures were checked when the food arrived on Unit 2 after they were placed on the steam table. The temperature of the hot foods that were served was as follows: baked ziti was 110 degrees F and the broccoli was 130 degrees F. On 8/17/17 at approximately 4:20 PM, the Director of Food Services was interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-08-17 · tag F0411 — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assist 1 of 25 residents (Resident #6), in the survey sample to arrange dental services. The facility staff failed to assist Resident #6 to have his broken lower denture repaired or replaced. The findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility 2/27/17 and has not been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, hyperlipidemia, seizure disorder, sleep apnea and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/27/17 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #6's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of 2 persons with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene and total care of two persons with bathing. On 8/16/17 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-08-17 · tag F0166 — isolatedTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to promptly resolve a grievance for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #6), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to resolve Resident #6's grievance to have his broken lower denture repaired or replaced. The findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility 2/27/17 and has not been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, hyperlipidemia, seizure disorder, sleep apnea and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/27/17 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #6's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of 2 persons with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene and total care of two persons with bathing. On 8/16/17 at 10:30 a.m., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-08-17 · tag F0314 — isolatedGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to provide care and services to identify new pressure injuries for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #6), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to identify a new pressure ulcer to the base of Resident #6's neck and a change in the right lateral foot deep tissue injury to a stage 2 pressure injury. The findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility 2/27/17 and has not been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; diabetes, hyperlipidemia, seizure disorder, sleep apnea and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/27/17 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #6's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of 2 persons with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-08-17 · tag F0431 — isolatedMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review the facility staff failed to discard medication prior to the expiration date in 1 of three Medication Storage Rooms (Unit 2). The findings included: On 8/15/17 at approximately 2:30 p.m. the Medication Room on Unit 2, a bottle of Magic Mouthwash with an expiration date of 8/13/17 was observed. in the Refrigerator. LPN #3 stated on 8/15/17 at approximately 2:30 p.m., Yes, it's expired. I will get rid of it. The Mayo Clinic documents: Magic Mouthwash is the term given to a solution used to treat mouth sores (oral mucositis) caused by some forms of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Oral mucositis can be extremely painful and can result in an inability to eat, speak or swallow. Magic mouthwash provides some relief. The Facility Policy and Procedure revised 10/31/16, titled, Policy: 4.1 Physician/Prescriber Authorization and Communication of Orders to Pharmacy did not document information related to disposal of expired medications. The facility administration was informed of the findings during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-08-17 · tag F0441 — isolatedHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the potential development and transmission of infection during wound care for three of 25 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #1, #2, and #14. 1. For Resident #1 staff failed to ensure proper handwashing and provide a clean barrier field for supplies during wound care. 2. For Resident #2 staff failed to ensure proper handwashing and provide a clean barrier field for supplies during wound care. 3. For Resident #14 staff failed to ensure proper handwashing, maintain clean barrier field and prevent contamination of supplies during wound care. The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to Healing Stage IV Community Acquired Pressure Ulcer (1). Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-08-17 · tag F0514 — isolatedKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record for 1 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #14. The facility staff failed to accurately document a physician order of Cranberry capsule for Resident #14. It was ordered to be administered per gastronomy tube (G Tube) (1) but it was transcribed by the nurse to be administered by mouth. The findings included: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #14 included but not limited to, dementia (2), diabetes mellitus (3) and high blood pressure. The most recent Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 6/20/17, coded Resident #14 with a score of 99 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview and had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision-making. Resident #14 was assessed as having a G Tube in place. On 8/16/17, a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$102,245 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $102,245 — penalty dated 2025-09-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORFOLK HOLDINGS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/28/2021 |
| CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CHESAPEAKE EAST LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| EK 2005 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| FAY 2014 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| LL 2013 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MZR EAST LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SILVERSTONE EAST LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SOL 2000 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| STEVENS 3920 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| WILSON, STEVEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/23/2024 |
| RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/28/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495210. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2021-07-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.