No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation Center

1540 Founders Place, Charlottesville, VA 22902 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (434) 422-4800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$197,490 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $197,490 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-25)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2030 Avon Ct · (434) 220-4599 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
590 Peter Jefferson Pkwy, Suite 175, Room 172 · (434) 297-8840 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
221 Carlton Rd · (434) 977-5556 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Kemper Park Monticello Walk Bike Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.8%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.7%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.3%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%20.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.9%94.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.7%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.8%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.821.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.581.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 438 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 192 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.9%CMS range 54.4–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.9–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting72.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge78.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.6–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
61.5%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: provide supervision for a resident identified as having exit-seeking behaviors; develop and implement interventions to prevent a resident elopement; ensure the accuracy of elopement risk assessments and timeliness of reassessment upon the identification of exit-seeking behaviors; ensure the facility's protocol for a missing resident (Code Orange) was promptly and correctly implemented when Resident #127 eloped from the facility on 05/11/2025 without staff knowledge; ensure Resident #133, identified by the facility as being at risk for elopement had their admission Record included in the facility's elopement binder; and ensure Resident #133's wander guard was securely attached. These failures affected 2 (Resident #127 and Resident #133) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, clinical record, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to prevent a worsening stage three pressure ulcer for one of 12 residents, resulting in harm for Resident #8 (R8), and failed to assess and implement treatment timely for a stage three pressure ulcer for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #5 (R5). 1. R8 did not have an accurate skin assessment, resulting in a delay in treatment of a worsening stage three pressure ulcer/wound. 2. R5 had a delay in treatment of a stage three pressure ulcer/wound. The findings included: According to the clinical record, R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but not limited to hemiplegia, cerebral vascular accident, muscle weakness and aphasia. R8 had a 5 day minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool) dated 7/25/23 noted that the BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) was unable to be obtained. The MDS coded R8 as requiring extensive assistance on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate supervision and/or interventions for the prevention of falls for one of 25 residents (Resident #111), which resulted in actual harm and failed to ensure one of 25 residents (Resident #7) was safe when consuming hot liquids. Findings include: 1.) Resident #111's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: ataxia [impaired coordination] following a non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, myelodysplastic syndrome, pancytopenia, headache, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, dysphagia, mild protein calorie malnutrition, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, vertigo [dizziness/off balance feeling] and fracture of right femur. The most recent full MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 11, indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances voiced by 3 (Residents #72, #80, and #96) of 8 residents who attended the Resident Council meeting.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Service Concerns/Grievances, effective 03/01/2025, indicated, The Administrator is responsible for ensuring that the management staff are trained in appropriately resolving in-house patient/family service concerns and grievances at the point of service as promptly as possible. The management staff of the Health and Rehabilitation Center is charged with listening and responding to questions, needs, problems, or concerns brought to their attention by patients and/or families within the Health and Rehabilitation Center. The patient has the right to voice/file grievances/complaints without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The Administrator serves as the grievance official of the Center and is responsible for overseeing the grievance process and for receiving and tracking to their conclusion. During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote the dignity of 6 (Residents #7, #8, #41, #47, #97, and #112) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, staff failed to knock and gain permission before they entered the room of Resident #41 and Resident #112; failed to perform a fingerstick blood sugar reading for Resident #7 in a private area; and failed to serve the lunch meal for Residents #8, #47, and #97, who were all seated at a table together at the same time.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rights Annual Review, dated 02/2004 revealed, It is the policy at this Healthcare Center that all Residents shall have the following rights and privileges: Per the policy, 12. To be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in care for his/her personal needs. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #112 on 05/20/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct an ongoing quarterly assessment to determine if a resident could safely administer their medication(s) as directed by the facility policy for 1 (Resident #72) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for choices. The facility further failed to have evidence of a completed assessment to determine if a resident was able to self-administer their albuterol inhaler for 1 (Resident #87) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for choices. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication at Bedside, effective 01/29/2024, revealed, Policy A licensed nurse will assess patient's ability to self-administer medication. Procedure 1. The patient may request to keep medications at bedside for self-administration in a lock box. 2. Complete Medication Self-Administration Safety Screen assessment. 3. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the assessment and together, use clinical judgement to determine if the patient is eligible. 4. If eligible, medications that are ordered by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #127) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.Findings included: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024, revealed Section E: Behavior Intent: The items in this section identify behavioral symptoms in the last seven days that may cause distress to the resident, or may be distressing or disruptive to facility residents, staff members or the care environment. These behaviors may place the resident at risk for injury, isolation, and inactivity and may also indicate unrecognized needs, preferences or illness. Behaviors include those that are potentially harmful to the resident themself. The emphasis is identifying behaviors, which does not necessarily imply a medical diagnosis. Identification of the frequency and the impact of behavioral symptoms on the resident and on others is critical to distinguish behaviors that constitute problems from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ordered medication was available for administration for 1 (Resident #128) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for change of condition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, General Guidelines for Medication Administration, revised 08/2020, indicated The facility had sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions. Resident #128's Admission/readmission Nursing Collection Tool V15-V2, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 08/01/2021 with a medical history to include a diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis. Resident #128's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 08/01/2025, for gabapentin (a prescription medication used to treat nerve pain) capsule, 100 milligrams by mouth three times a day for alcoholic cirrhosis of liver and an order dated 08/01/2025, for sucralfate (a prescription medication used to treat ulcers) oral tablet, 1 gram give one tablet by mouth two times a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the administrative staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation into the elopement of Resident #127 from the facility on 05/11/2025. This deficient practice affected 1 (Resident #127) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.Findings included: The Job Description for the Administrator revised 04/2023, indicated The Administrator is directly responsible for the overall successful operations of the healthcare center. The primary role of the Administrator is to plan, direct and lead the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern skilled nursing facilities to ensure that residents are consistently receiving care and services in line with the company's vision of Care Beyond Care. The Job Description for the Director of Nursing (DON) revised 05/2023, indicated The Director of Nursing is responsible for the overall management, supervision, and direction of the nursing services department. The DON implements and maintains nursing department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident elopement involving 1 (Resident #127) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents was reviewed by the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee.Findings included:On 05/11/2025 at 8:55 PM, Resident #127, identified by the facility as having exit-seeking behaviors, eloped from the facility without staff knowledge. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20, assigned to the care of the resident, failed to ensure the facility's missing person protocol (Code Orange) was implemented as specified. Per facility documents, the Administrator was not made aware of the resident's elopement until 10:48 PM on 05/11/2025. The facility staff failed to notify the resident's responsible party that the resident was missing. On 05/11/2025 at 11:08 PM, the resident used their cell phone and called a family member and reported they were at a baseball game, cold, and needed to be picked up. The resident's responsible party then notified the facility staff of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #5) of 27 sampled residents' rooms was free of pests.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pest Control, effected 01/01/2019, indicated Policy: The Center environment will be monthly inspected and treated for pests by a corporate-approved contractor. A pest service receipt dated 06/30/2025, revealed pest control maintenance was completed on 06/30/2025. The facility was unable to provide any other documentation of monthly inspections for pest control as specified in their policy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/17/2025, revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 05/02/2017. The MDS indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Per the MDS, Resident #5 had active diagnoses to include stroke, heart failure and hypertension. During a concurrent observation and interview on 09/22/2025 at 3:53 PM, Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow abuse prevention policies regarding volunteers for eight of nine volunteer records reviewed.The findings include:On 7/17/25 at 9:04 a.m., the activity director (other staff #5) was interviewed about current volunteers used in the facility and any required screening for volunteers. The activity director stated volunteers assisted at times with provision of activities including games and music. The activity director stated the facility had one pastor that came to the facility weekly, one previous resident that visited residents in the day area and several members from local churches that provided music, visits and assistance with games such as Bingo. The activities director stated prior to providing services, all volunteers were required to complete an application and a self-questionnaire about any past or pending criminal charges. The activities director stated the application and criminal questionnaire were reviewed by the administrator and if approved, human resources then performed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff allowed self-administration of medications without a prior assessment or physician's order for two of eight residents in the survey sample (Residents #5 and #6). The findings include: Resident #5 (R5) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, asthma, atrial fibrillation, anorexia, depression, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, anxiety and insomnia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R5 as cognitively intact. Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, insomnia, depression, anxiety and hypertension. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed R6 as cognitively intact. 1. Oral medications were prepared and left at the bedside on 2/22/25 for R5 and R6 to self-administer when the residents had no prior assessment or physician's order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of quality during medication administration for two of eight residents in the survey sample (Residents #5 and #6). The findings include: On 2/22/25, oral medications were prepared ahead of the scheduled administration time and left unattended/unsecured at the bedside for two residents (Residents #5 and #6). The nurse failed to observe R5 take the prepared medications. Resident #5 (R5) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, asthma, atrial fibrillation, anorexia, depression, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, anxiety and insomnia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R5 as cognitively intact. Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, insomnia, depression, anxiety and hypertension. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed R6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for one of eight residents in the survey sample (Resident #4). The findings include: Resident #4 (R4) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis, MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus), end stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, hypertension and diabetes. The minimum data set (MDS dated [DATE] assessed R4 as cognitively intact. R4's closed clinical record documented a physician's order dated 1/30/25 for Zosyn (piperacillin - tazobactam) intravenous (IV) solution reconstituted 4.5 (4-0.5) grams with instructions to give 4.5 grams intravenously every 12 hours until 3/5/25 for treatment of acute osteomyelitis. R4's medication administration record (MAR) for February 2025 documented Zosyn was scheduled for administration at 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. each day. The MAR documented Zosyn was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications remained secured in locked compartments and/or carts for two of eight residents in the survey sample (Residents #5 and #6). The findings include: Resident #5 (R5) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, asthma, atrial fibrillation, anorexia, depression, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, anxiety and insomnia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R5 as cognitively intact. Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, insomnia, depression, anxiety and hypertension. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed R6 as cognitively intact. 1. The medication Trelegy Ellipta inhaler was observed stored unsecured on Resident #5's bedside table. On 6/10/25 at 10:45 a.m., R5 was observed in her room with a Trelegy Ellipta…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to include insulin administration in the baseline care plan for one of three residents in the survey sample (Resident #11). The findings include: Resident #11's baseline care plan included no goals/interventions regarding insulin administration with use of an insulin pump. Resident #11 (R11) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's, diabetes, asthma, hypertension, irritable bowel syndrome, self-imposed factitious disorder, chronic atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. An admission assessment date 8/1/24 listed R11 as cognitively intact and oriented to person, place, time and situation. R11's clinical record documented the resident was admitted to the facility with use of an insulin pump for insulin administration related to diabetes. R11's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented the resident had his own insulin pump and had demonstrated sufficient ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan for one resident, Resident #13 (R13) out of three residents in the survey. The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and revise R13's care plan with weight bearing status. On 2/4/25 at 9:45 a.m. an interview was conducted with the therapy manager. The therapy manager stated that R13 participated in physical therapy. He stated that R13 was non weight bearing to right leg. On 2/4/25 at 9:57 a.m. an interview was conducted with a certified nursing assistant, CNA#3 (CNA3). CNA3 said, if resident is non weight bearing therapy will evaluate and let us know. We don't know weight bearing status until therapy evaluates but sometimes the nurse reports it to us. On 2/4/25 at 10:00 a.m. an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN#3 (LPN3). LPN3 stated that when she receives report about the patient's weight bearing status that she would give report to the aide. LPN3 stated she would expect weight bearing status to be on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient dietary staff to provide timely meal delivery on four of four units. The findings include: There was an insufficient number of dietary staff working on 6/9/24 to provide preparation and service of breakfast for residents within the facility. Review of the dietary department as-worked schedule for 6/9/24 revealed that no dietary employees worked in the main kitchen, other than the dietary manager. A hand-written employee schedule documented one cook, and five dietary aides were scheduled to work on 6/9/24 from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. This schedule documented the cook and the five dietary aides either called out, went home, or were a no-show on 6/9/24. On 11/12/24 at 3:10 p.m., the dietary manager (other staff #8) was interviewed about kitchen staff on 6/9/24. The dietary manager stated that she was newly hired on 6/4/24. The dietary manager stated there were conflicts with the cook working at that time and all the kitchen staff scheduled for the day shift on 6/9/24 did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide timely breakfast service on four of four units. The findings include: There was no cooked breakfast provided to residents in the facility on the morning of 6/9/24. Posted breakfast times were 8:00 a.m. on the 200 and 300 units and at 8:30 a.m. on the 100 and 400 units. Posted mealtimes documented dinner was served daily at 5:00 p.m. (200, 300 units) and 5:30 p.m. (100, 400 units). Review of the dietary department as-worked schedule for 6/9/24 revealed no dietary employees worked in the main kitchen. A hand-written employee schedule documented one cook and five dietary aides were scheduled to work on 6/9/24, from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. This schedule documented the cook, and the five dietary aides either called out, went home, or were a no show on 6/9/24. On 11/12/24 at 3:10 p.m., the dietary manager (other staff #8) was interviewed about kitchen staff on 6/9/24. The dietary manager stated she was newly hired on 6/4/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a therapeutic diet and provide foods correctly per meal ticket for four of five residents in the survey sample (Residents #1 through #4). The findings include: 1. Resident #2 (R2) was not provided a diabetic diet for lunch and was not provided foods per meal ticket for breakfast. Resident #3 (R3) was not provided a diabetic diet for lunch. Resident #4 (R4) was not provided foods per meal ticket for breakfast. The R2's clinical record indicated that R2 had diagnoses that included Diabetes, anemia, and anorexia. MDS (minimal Data Set) dated 11/5/24 indicated R2 was severely cognitively impaired. The R3's clinical record indicated that R3 had diagnoses that included: Diabetes, gout, and obesity. MDS (minimal Data Set) dated 9/30/24 indicated R3 was severely cognitively impaired. The R4's clinical record indicated that R4 had diagnoses that included: neuropathy and dysphasia. MDS (minimal Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner from the main kitchen and on two of four kitchenettes (200-unit, 300-unit). The findings include: In the main kitchen, multiple food items were stored beyond use-by dates, with no prep dates and/or opened dates and/or were unsealed in the freezer. Bulk condiment storage containers, flour/sugar bins and the manual can opener were dirty. An employee was observed in the kitchen during meal preparation without a hair restraint. Employee food items were stored in the walk-in refrigerator. On the 200 and 300 units, foods were held on the kitchenette steam tables below recommended safe temperatures and served to residents without reheating. a) The main kitchen was inspected on 11/12/24 at 10:50 a.m., accompanied by the dietary manager (other staff #8). Observed stored in the walk-in refrigerator was a plastic bag containing chopped chicken, cheese, and tortillas. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate a preference for showers twice each week for one of five residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, arthritis, and lymphedema. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 as cognitively intact and as requiring supervision and/or touch assistance with bathing. On 11/12/24 at 1:10 p.m., R1 was interviewed about his shower schedule and preference for bathing. R1 stated he wanted two showers each week. R1 stated at times he did not receive twice weekly showers according to his preference. R1's clinical record documented the resident did not receive showers twice per week during February 2024 and March 2024. R1's bath/shower records documented the resident had no showers during the week of 2/11/24 through 2/17/24; one shower (on 2/22/24) during the week of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of five residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: Nursing staff failed to document treatments provided to Resident #1 at the time the care was provided. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, arthritis, and lymphedema. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 as cognitively intact. R1's clinical record documented physician orders for the following treatments listed with the date ordered: 8/14/24 - Zeasorb-AF external powder 2%, apply to abdominal folds, gluteal cleft and behind left knee topically every day and evening shift for treatment of yeast. 8/24/24 - Apply zinc barrier cream twice per day to intergluteal cleft discoloration and leave open to air. 8/24/24 - Change bilateral Circaid wraps every day, inspect skin, wash/dry legs, apply lotion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one of five residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: Resident #1 did not have topical powder and zinc barrier cream applied or leg wraps changed as ordered by the physician. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, arthritis, and lymphedema. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 as cognitively intact. R1's clinical record documented orders for the following treatments: 8/14/24 - Zeasorb-AF external powder 2%, apply to abdominal folds, gluteal cleft and behind left knee topically every day and evening shift for treatment of yeast. 8/24/24 - Apply zinc barrier cream twice per day to intergluteal cleft discoloration and leave open to air. 8/24/24 - Change bilateral Circaid wraps every day, inspect skin, wash/dry legs, apply lotion with new pair of liners each day shift. R1's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature on one of four units (200-unit). The findings include: Review of monthly resident council minutes from May 2024 through October 2024 revealed ongoing complaints from residents about meals served with foods not at adequate temperature. There was no documented follow up on the council minutes regarding interventions or actions taken in response to the food complaints. On 11/12/24 at 1:10 p.m., the resident council president (Resident #1) was interviewed about any resident concerns with food/meals. The council president stated that residents reported and complained about cold food all the time. The council president stated cold food had been brought up in most of the council meetings during the last several months. On 11/12/24 at 12:20 p.m., the meal service from the 200-unit kitchenette was observed. The dietary aide (other staff #6) checked food temperatures, with multiple food items measured below the required 135 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide foods accommodating resident preferences for one of five residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: Resident #1's food preferences were not honored. According to the clinical record review, Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, arthritis, and lymphedema. Also documented was a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], which assessed R1 as cognitively intact. On 11/12/24 at 1:10 p.m., R1 was observed with lunch. The foods served to R1 were compared to the meal ticket provided with the meal. R1 was served two baked chicken breasts, mashed potatoes, mixed vegetables, a roll, chocolate cupcake and yogurt. R1's meal ticket included the baked chicken, yogurt, and vegetables but did not list the mashed potatoes, roll, or cupcake. The ticket listed a tossed salad with dressing, which was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide feeding assistance for 2 of 5 resident in the survey sample, Resident #4 (R4) and Resident #5 (R5). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to assist R4 with dentures and ensure they were put in place prior to feeding the resident. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R4 included but are not limited to dysphagia, oral phase. R4's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/22/24 coded R4 with moderate cognitive impairment. R4 was coded in section G with needing extensive feeding assistance of one person. On 7/26/24 at 8:15 a.m. an observation was made of the breakfast meal. R4' s breakfast meal was taken in her room and left within in her reach without facility staff remaining in the resident's room. Facility staff did not assist R4 with placing her dentures in her mouth prior to eating breakfast. The licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care to one resident (resident #2- R2), in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included: On 7/25/24 at 12:18 p.m., the daughter of R2 met with the surveyors. The family member reported that she visits daily and stays for long periods of time because she has concerns about the facility staff not providing care to her mother. On 7/25/24 at approximately 3:55 p.m., the surveyor went to visit with R2. R2 was lying in bed and did not communicate or answer questions. The daughter of R2 was at the bedside and reported that from the time she arrived a little after 12 noon, until 3pm, no staff had entered her mother's room to provide any care. At 3 p.m., the family member went into the hall and sought out a staff member to assist with incontinence care of R2. During care, it was noted that R2 had saturated not only her incontinence brief, but her pants were visibly wet with urine all the way to the knees. The family member showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident (Resident #1- R1), in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included: For R1, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete clinical record with regards to the hospice services provided, including her death, which was pronounced by the hospice staff. On [DATE], a closed record review was conducted of R1's chart. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. R1 was admitted from an acute care hospital with the diagnosis to include, but not limited to, traumatic subdural hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. According to the physician orders, on [DATE], an order was written for a hospice consult. On [DATE], another order was written, which noted a hospice company name. Within the clinical record there were no notes or details regarding hospice care, treatment, or involvement when R1 expired at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care for a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) for one of nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #104). The findings include: There was no dressing applied to Resident #104's PEG tube site as required in the plan of care to prevent feeding tube complications. Resident #104 (R104) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hemiplegia, dysphagia with gastrostomy, hypertension, depression and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R104 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 5/6/24 at 2:30 p.m., R104 was observed in bed with the abdomen uncovered and the feeding tube site visible. There was no dressing around R104's feeding tube with the insertion site exposed. No dislodged or old dressings were observed on or around the resident's bed. R104's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 3/10/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration to one of nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #108). The findings include: Resident #108 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included deep vein thrombosis, metastatic cancer, hypertension, gastroenteritis, and cellulitis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R108 as cognitively intact. R108's closed clinical record documented physician orders dated 3/11/24 for the following medications. Baclofen 5 mg (milligrams) two times per day for muscle spasms. Hydrocortisone ace-pramoxine external cream 2.5-1 % topically two times a day for treatment of separated foreskin. Potassium chloride crystals 20 milliequivalents (mEq) once daily for prevention of hypokalemia. R108's nursing notes documented the morning doses of Baclofen and the hydrocortisone ace-pramoxine cream were not available for administration on 3/12/24. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility failed to notify the responsibly party (RP) of a change in condition for one of 12 residents. The Findings Include: Resident #7 (R7) had a ground level fall, and the RP was not notified. According to the clinical record, diagnoses for R7 included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, dementia, walking difficulty, and falls. The most current MDS (minimum data set - assessment tool) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/4/23. R7 was assessed with a cognitive score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a (late entry) progress note dated 1/16/24 noted . charge nurse placed residents bed in low position, resident then slid herself on the edge of the bed which this writer assist with lowering her to the floor unable to get the CNA [certified nursing assistant] on duty with assisting her back to bed, resident was able to hold to walker and stated I'm getting out of here The facilities progress notes documented that R7 was sent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two of 12 residents (Resident 7 & Resident 9). 1. Assessments were not completed for Resident #7 (R7) after a fall. 2. A syringe with needle was not properly disposed of for R9. The Findings Include: 1. Assessments were not completed for Resident #7 (R7) after a fall. According to the clinical record, diagnoses for R7 included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, dementia, walking difficulty, and falls. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/4/23. R7 was assessed with a cognitive score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a (late entry) progress note dated 1/16/24 noted . charge nurse placed residents bed in low position, resident then slid herself on the edge of the bed which this writer assist with lowering her to the floor unable to get the CNA [certified nursing assistant] on duty with assisting her back to bed, resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for a skin condition for one of 12 residents (Resident #9). The Findings Include: Resident #9 (R9) did not have interventions for a skin rash to the groin area. According to the closed record review, diagnoses for R9 included diabetes, dementia, and abscess of right foot. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 5 day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/26/23, which assessed R9 with a cognitive score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of R9's Skin Observation Tool, dated 1/30/2023, 2/6/2023, and 2/10/2023 documented R9 had a Rash to the Groin. Review of the physician's orders did not evidence any interventions, including treatments, that were ordered for the rash. R9's care plan was also reviewed and did not show interventions for R9's rash. On 3/6/24 at 11:25 AM, license practical nurse (LPN #4, wound nurse) was interviewed. LPN #4 reviewed R9's clinical record and verbalized inability to evidence interventions for the rash and stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to administer tube feeding per physician order for one resident (Resident #12, R12) in a survey sample of 12 residents. The findings include: R12 did not receive the correct amount of tube feeding per physicain's orders. R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R12 included but are not limited to hemiplegia, dysphagia, asthma and epilepsy. R12's minumum data set (MDS - assessment tool), dated 12/11/23, coded R12 with severe cognitive impairment. R12 needs extensive assistance from the staff with activities of daily living. On 3/4/24 at 4:10 p.m., observation was made of the tube feeding pump not being on, no feeding being given, the feeding tube was disconnected from R12, and hanging over the feeding pump. On 3/4/24 at 4:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with the licensed practical nurse (LPN#7). LPN#7 verbalized that R12 has a down time for 2 hours between the current bottle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration to one of nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #108). The findings include: Resident #108 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included deep vein thrombosis, metastatic cancer, hypertension, gastroenteritis, and cellulitis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R108 as cognitively intact. R108's closed clinical record documented physician orders dated 3/11/24 for the following medications. Baclofen 5 mg (milligrams) two times per day for muscle spasms. Hydrocortisone ace-pramoxine external cream 2.5-1 % topically two times a day for treatment of separated foreskin. Potassium chloride crystals 20 milliequivalents (mEq) once daily for prevention of hypokalemia. R108's nursing notes documented the morning doses of Baclofen and the hydrocortisone ace-pramoxine cream were not available for administration on 3/12/24. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor food preferences for one of twelve residents in the survey sample (Resident #6). The findings include: According to the clincal record, Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included lymphedema, congestive heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, rheumatoid arthritis, and morbid obesity. The most recent minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool) dated 12/2/23 assessed R6 as cognitively intact for daily decision making. On 3/5/24 at 11:40 a.m., R6 was interviewed about quality of care in the facility. R6 stated he was supposed to get a heart healthy, low sodium diet, but that meals had been served not according to preferences. R6 stated he had requested baked chicken without any seasoning for lunch and dinner and that regular chicken with seasonings had been served. R6 stated he wanted only eggs with toast for breakfast and had been served sausage for breakfast. R6 stated he had been served chicken salad and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of twelve residents in the survey sample (Resident #6) The findings include: Resident #6's treatment administration records were incomplete and did not accurately document dressing changes. According to the clinical record, Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included lymphedema, congestive heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, rheumatoid arthritis, and morbid obesity. The minimum data set (MDS - assesment tool) dated 12/2/23 assessed R6 as cognitively intact for daily decision making. R6's clinical record documented the following physician orders: 10/30/22 - house stock moisturizer barrier cream to bilateral lower extremities daily. 2/8/24 - Cleanse left medial ankle with cleanser, apply Xeroform and calcium alginate, cover with bordered gauze 3 times per week until healed. 2/23/24 - Change bilateral Circaid wraps every day, inspect skin and apply lotion to legs. R6's treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner. Hot food items were served from the steam table on unit 3 below the safe/recommended temperature of 135 degrees (F). Dietary staff entered the unit 3 kitchen during meal service without washing hands. A maintenance employee entered the unit 3 kitchen during food service without a hairnet. The findings include: On 9/6/22 at 12:16 p.m., lunch service from the unit 3 kitchen was observed. The dietary aide (other staff #2) placed trays of hot food on the steam table from a hot box. The dietary aide then left the kitchen stating he had to get a pen to record the food temperatures. The dietary aide returned a few minutes later, entered the kitchen and without prior hand hygiene, put on gloves. The food temperatures of items on the steam table measured by the dietary aide were as follows (in degrees F). shrimp stir-fry - 153 Salisbury steak - 155 steamed rice - 173 broccoli - 171 mixed vegetables - 137 mashed potatoes - 138 shredded/chopped shrimp - 105 pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed for one of 25 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 109) to provide a dignified dining experience. Staff were observed feeding Resident # 109 while standing next to him. The finding were: Resident # 109 was admitted with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, history of COVID-19, macular degeneration, blindness left eye, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Vitamin-D deficiency, dysphagia, chronic prostatitis, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, difficulty in walking, and generalized muscle weakness. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set, a Quarterly Review, with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/29/2022, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as having short and long term memory problems with severely impaired daily decision making skills. At 12:30 p.m. on 9/7/2022, Resident # 109 was observed seated at a table in the Unit Four dining area. The resident was being fed by a Certified Nursing Assistant, later identified as CNA #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to document a DNR (DO NOT RESUSCITATE) status in the clinical record for one of 25 residents, Resident #93. Findings were: Resident #93 was admitted with the following diagnoses including but not limited to: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), respiratory failure, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and hypertension. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE] assessed Resident #93 as cognitively intact with a summary score of 15. Resident #93 was interviewed on [DATE] at approximately 2:00 p.m. regarding life at the facility. In the course of the conversation she was asked if she had any advance directives in place. She stated that she had chosen to be a DNR. The clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at approximately 2:45 p.m. There were no physician orders for resuscitation status observed in the clinical record. There were no directions regarding advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint investigation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed for resident of 25 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 112), to notify the resident's family of a change in condition. Resident # 112 suffered a change in mental status that was not communicated to the resident's family. The findings were: Resident # 112 was admitted with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left lower leg, arteriosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, restless leg syndrome, protein-calorie malnutrition, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, iron deficiency anemia, acute ischemic heart disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, history of malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung, absence of (part) lung, and generalized muscle weakness. According to a Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/11/2021, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as being cognitively intact with a Summary Score of 15 out of 15. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed for one of 25 residents in the survey sample, to ensure the resident had a completed Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Resident # 109 did not have a PASARR completed at admission. The findings include: Resident # 109 was admitted with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, history of COVID-19, macular degeneration, blindness left eye, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Vitamin-D deficiency, dysphagia, chronic prostatitis, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, difficulty in walking, and generalized muscle weakness. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set, a Quarterly Review, with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/29/2022, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as having short and long term memory problems with severely impaired daily decision making skills. A review of Resident # 109's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident did not have a PASARR completed at admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 25 residents in the survey sample. Resident #107 did not have a baseline care plan for a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for Resident #107 included: Acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus), and diabetes. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 5 day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/26/22. Resident #107's cognitive score was a 12 indicating moderately cognitively intact. Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] On 9/06/22 at 3:45 PM an interview with Resident #107 was attempted. During the interview Resident #107 was asked about the PICC line observed in the right upper arm. Resident #107 verbalized she did not know what it was for. On 9/6/22 Resident #107 physician orders were reviewed and documented an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of twenty-five residents in the survey sample. Resident #102 had no care plan developed regarding diabetic management, anticoagulant use and epilepsy. Residents #22 had no individualized care plan for recreational activities. The findings include: 1. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis, epilepsy, cellulitis, diabetes, MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) infection, depression, hypertension, heart failure, history of cerebral infarction, and acute deep vein embolism/thrombosis of lower extremity. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #102 as cognitively intact. On 9/7/22 at 8:00 a.m., Resident #102 was interviewed about quality of care in the facility. Resident #102 stated she received blood sugar checks and insulin daily. The resident stated she was also prescribed a blood thinner and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to review and revise the CCP (comprehensive care plan) for one of 25 residents in the survey sample. Resident #111's CCP was not reviewed and revised for adequate fall interventions and/or supervision for the prevention of falls. Findings include: Resident #111's CCP was not reviewed and revised for adequate fall interventions and/or supervision for the prevention of falls. Resident #111's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: ataxia [impaired coordination] following a non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, myelodysplastic syndrome, pancytopenia, headache, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, dysphagia, mild protein calorie malnutrition, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, vertigo (dizziness) and fracture of right femur. The most recent full MDS (minimum data set) was an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respond to a pharmacy recommendation for one of twenty-five residents in the survey sample. Resident #57's recommendation regarding continued use of antibiotics had no physician response. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included prostate cancer, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, emphysema, heart failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), depression, anxiety, obstructive uropathy, bladder cancer and chronic pain. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #57 as cognitively intact. Resident #57's clinical record documented a pharmacy recommendation dated 6/29/22 documenting the following, This resident is on this Azithromycin and Bactrim DS since 6/20/22 without stop date. Prolonged use of antimicrobial agents can result in superinfection. Please indicate below the duration of therapy or reasons for continual usage . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-03-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 residents in the survey sample was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #56 had physician orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications that extended for more than 14 days without a stop date. The findings include: Resident #56 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, colostomy, muscle weakness, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and encounter for palliative care - hospice. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] which was a quarterly assessment, assessed Resident #56 as severely cognitive impaired for daily decision making with a score of 4 out of 15. On 03/17/2021 Resident #56's clinical record was reviewed. Observed on the physician order sheet was the following: Ativan Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) (LORazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure expired medications were not readily available for distribution on the 200 unit and 300 unit, and failed to label an open vial of insulin on the 400 unit. The findings include: 1. On 03/17/2021 at 7:37 a.m. medication storage observations were conducted on the 300 all RN #1 (registered nurse). Observed on the 300 long hall medication cart were the following opened bottle of medications: 1. Rugby Vitamin B-12 1000 mcg (microgram) supplement 100 tablets, open date 9/8/20, expiration date 4/20. 2. Sunmark Loratadine 10 mg (milligram) antihistamine 90 tablets, open date 1/2/20, expiration date 11/20. 3. Gericare Theratabs High Potency Multivitamin formula 100 caplets, open date 8/9/20, expiration date 7/20. 4. Gericare Extra Strength Simethicone Gas Relief 125 mg (milligrams) 30 tablets, open date 8/1/20, expiration date 12/20. On 03/17/2021 at 8:02 a.m., RN #1 was interviewed regarding expiration medication. RN #1 stated, we are supposed to complete random checks for expired meds,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Findings included: On 03/16/21 at 10:30 A.M. an initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted along with the dietary manager (other staff, OS #2). The walk in refrigerator was observed. An opened packet of a partial whole ham had no label indicating open or expiration date. A container of cooked egg noodles was open to air (not covered) and without a label. OS #2 was asked about the open container of egg noodles. OS #2 stated a larger pan of egg noodles had fallen and the staff had picked up the egg noodles and placed them into the small container and they should have been thrown away. The reach in refrigerator was then observed. A packet of sausage patties were open without a label indicating an open or expiration date, and a packet of sliced ham was also opened without a label. OS #2 stated that the packages should have labels on them. A Refrigerator Food Storage Schedule was attached to the front of the walk in refrigerator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection prevention control practices during communal dining on one of four units, unit 4. The findings include: On 3/16/2021 at 12:15 PM, 14 residents were observed seated in the 400 hall dining room during the lunch time meal. All residents were seated either across from each other or adjacent to each and were approximately less than six feet apart. Additionally, some dining room tables were positioned such that the resident's dining chair/wheelchair backs were nearly touching the backs of the chairs to the tables behind them. On 3/16/2021 at 12:35 PM, certified nursing assistant (CNA #9), who assisted in the 400 hall dining room during the observation, was interviewed regarding social distancing requirements for communal dining. CNA #9 stated that since everyone had gotten the second COVID vaccine, she was told they could start bringing the resident's into the dining room, with 2 at a table, and that although the resident's that were sitting adjacent to each other were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-19 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain physician orders for immediate care for one of 22 residents in the survey sample. Resident #142 had no physician orders upon admission for care of pressure ulcers, impaired skin integrity, and monitoring of a dialysis access port. The findings include: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pancreatitis, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, bullous pemphigoid, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, atrial flutter, anemia and hip fracture. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #142 as alert, oriented to person with confusion and short-term memory problems. This assessment listed the resident as incontinent of bowel/bladder and as requiring physical assistance of two people for bed mobility and totally dependent upon staff for transfers. Resident #142's clinical record documented a skin assessment dated [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #9 included, but were not limited to: CHF (congestive heart failure), PVD (peripheral vascular disease), history of stroke, dementia, malnutrition and depression. The most current MDS, a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 7, indicating the resident had moderate impairment in daily decision making skills. The resident was also assessed as requiring limited assistance from at least one staff for most all ADLs (activities of daily living) and set up only for eating. This MDS also assessed the resident in Section K0300. as having a 5% weight loss in the last month or 10% weight loss in the last 6 months (not physician prescribed), and in Section K0310. assessed the resident as having a 5%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #142. Resident #142's baseline care plan failed the include pressure ulcers, impaired skin integrity, fall/injury prevention, and anticoagulant use. The findings include: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pancreatitis, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, bullous pemphigoid, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, atrial flutter, anemia and hip fracture. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #142 as alert, oriented to person with confusion and short-term memory problems. This assessment listed the resident as incontinent of bowel/bladder and as requiring physical assistance of two people for bed mobility and totally dependent upon staff for transfers. Resident #142's clinical record documented an admission skin assessment dated [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice during medication administration for one of 22 residents, Resident #18. The findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #18 included but was not limited to: Unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Heart failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Mild cognitive impairment, and Acute follicular conjunctivitis, left eye. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/24/20. Resident #18 was assessed with a cognitive score of 06 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 3/16/2021 at 10:40 AM, upon entering Resident #18's room, a medicine cup with several pills in it and a bottle of prescription nasal spray were observed on resident #18's bedside table. When asked about the medications, Resident #18 stated she was waiting for someone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for protective arm sleeves for one of 22 resident's, Resident #8. The Findings Include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #8 included: Cellulitis, diabetes, neuropathy and dementia. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/5/20. Resident #8 was assessed with a cognitive score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 03/16/21, Resident #8's medical record was reviewed. An active physician's order, originally dated 11/24/20 documented Tubi grip [arm protectors] to both forearms Q [every] shift for protection [ .] Resident #8's current care plan included a care plan regarding skin impairment. An intervention dated 11/25/20 read Tubi Grip sleeves to BUE [bilateral upper extremity]. On 03/16/21 at 10:58 AM, Resident #8 was interviewed. During the interview Resident #8's arms were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and provide care/treatment to pressure ulcers for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #142. Resident #142, assessed with pressure ulcers upon admission to the facility, had no assessment and interventions implemented for care/treatment of the wounds. The findings include: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pancreatitis, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, bullous pemphigoid, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, atrial flutter, anemia and hip fracture. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #142 as alert, oriented to person with confusion and short-term memory problems. This assessment listed the resident as incontinent of bowel/bladder and as requiring physical assistance of two people for bed mobility and totally dependent upon staff for transfers. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for a Foley catheter for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #54. Findings include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #54 included, but were not limited to: pneumonia, sleep apnea, altered mental status, anxiety disorder, depression, thyroid disorder, high blood pressure, history of stroke, seizure disorder and urinary retention. The most current full MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment dated [DATE]. The resident was assessed as having short and long term memory impairment with severe impairment in daily decision making skills. The resident was assessed to require extensive to total assistance for all ADLs (activities of daily living). The resident was assessed as having a catheter on this MDS. On 03/16/21 at 12:20 PM, Resident #54 was sitting in a geri chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to monitor a dialysis access port for one of 22 residents in the survey sample. For four days after admission, facility staff failed to assess Resident #142's dialysis access port for complications. The findings include: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pancreatitis, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, bullous pemphigoid, anxiety, diabetes, hypertension, atrial flutter, anemia and hip fracture. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #142 as alert, oriented to person with confusion and short-term memory problems. This assessment listed the resident as incontinent of bowel/bladder and as requiring physical assistance of two people for bed mobility and totally dependent upon staff for transfers. Resident #142's clinical record documented an admission assessment dated [DATE] listing the resident had a catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 22 residents, Resident #188. An After Visit Summary dated [DATE] was not completely scanned into the electronic record. Page one of the summary was identified on the bottom of the page as Page 1 of 6. The remaining five pages were not in the clinical record. Findings were: Resident #188 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following an approximate two month stay at a local hospital. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Necrotizing faciitis with GBS (Group B Streptococcus), Cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction of 18% with ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator) in place and stents, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, Foley catheter (wound protection), loop colostomy (wound protection), morbid obesity and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. The admission MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE], assessed Resident #188 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$197,490 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $134,196 — penalty dated 2025-10-25
  • $63,294 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ALBEMARLE HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2021
AK 2003 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
AL 2003 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CENTRAL BAY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
GOLDEN 2017 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
GOLDEN 2017 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MATT 2002 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MATT 2002 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MRCZ CENTRAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
NATHAN 5604 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
NATHAN 5604 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
NATHAN 5604 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
PIVOTAL CENTRAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAS 1998 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
ADAMS, RONALDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/14/2023
RYBST CENTRAL MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2021

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.1M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 20%Other / private 20%

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,329per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$450per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495420. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next