APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTER
235 Evergreen Ave, Appomattox, VA 24522 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (434) 352-7420 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,636 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.3% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 15.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.0% | 20.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.2% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.4% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.8% | 73.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.8% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.4% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.83 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.0%CMS range 50.6–66.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.8–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 74.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 79.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 5.0–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide proper medical treatment for abnormal lab values resulting in hospitalization for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #4).The findings include:Resident #4 (R4) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, bacteremia, endocarditis, congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, obesity, diabetes, anemia, atrioventricular block, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and diverticulosis. R4's most recent minimum data set (MDS) assessed the resident as cognitively intact.R4's clinical record documented lab test results dated 8/10/23 listing R4 had a low sodium level of 125 mEq/L (reference range of 136 to 145) and normal potassium level of 4.8 mEq/L (reference range of 3.5 tot 5.1). The PA's progress note dated 8/14/23 referenced review of the 8/10/23 lab results and documented under diagnosis/plan that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-08-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident #4) was free from a significant medication error resulting in hospitalization for treatment of hyperkalemia.The findings include:Resident #4 (R4) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, bacteremia, endocarditis, congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, obesity, diabetes, anemia, atrioventricular block, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and diverticulosis. R4's most recent minimum data set (MDS) assessed the resident as cognitively intact.R4's clinical record documented lab test results dated 8/10/23 listing R4 had a low sodium level of 125 mEq/L (reference range of 136 to 145) and normal potassium level of 4.8 mEq/L (reference range of 3.5 tot 5.1). The PA's progress note dated 8/14/23 referenced review of the 8/10/23 lab results and documented under diagnosis/plan that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow abuse prevention policies for three of six residents in the survey sample (Residents #1, #3 and #4).The findings include:1. For Resident #1, facility staff failed to follow abuse prevention policies for submitting investigation findings within five days to the state agency and failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a certified nurse's aide to the department of health professions per facility policy.Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills.A facility reported incident form was sent to the state agency on 4/27/25 documenting an allegation of sexual misconduct between R1 and certified nurse's aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to submit investigation findings regarding an abuse allegation to the state agency for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).The findings include:Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills.A facility reported incident form was sent to the state agency on 4/27/25 documenting an allegation of sexual misconduct between R1 and certified nurse's aide (CNA) #1. The initial report was sent to the state agency on 4/27/25. The state agency received no final report of the facility's investigation/findings regarding this allegation. Review of the facility's investigation on 8/12/25 revealed a final investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an injury of unknown origin for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).The findings include:Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, hypertension, anorexia, dementia with behavioral disturbance and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R3 with severely impaired cognitive skills.R3's clinical record documented a nursing note dated 4/4/25 listing the resident was observed with an abrasion area on the left forehead and an abrasion over the right eyebrow. The note documented that the resident was unable to verbalize the cause of the injuries. The director of nursing (DON) documented a note on 4/4/25 at 6:39 p.m. of notification to the family about the assessed abrasions.Notification of R3's injury of unknown origin was sent to the state agency on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate minimum data set (MDS) for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).The findings include: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills.R1's clinical record documented a MDS assessment dated [DATE]. Section C. of this MDS for assessment of cognitive patterns was not completed. Each category of section C., including the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) and staff assessment of mental status, was marked not assessed.On 8/13/25 at 9:40 a.m., the registered nurse MDS coordinator (RN #2) was interviewed about R1's incomplete assessment. RN #2 reviewed the MDS and stated the cognitive section had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).The findings include:Resident #1's care plan was not revised to include a preference for no male caregivers.Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills.R1's clinical record documented a nursing note dated 4/29/25 stating, .spoke with [family member] today regarding patient care concerns. resident to not have male caregivers if at all possible .R1's plan of care (revised 7/21/25) documented the resident required total assistance from staff for activities of daily living. The care plan made no mention of a preference for no male…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide fall mats for injury prevention as required in the plan of care for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).The findings include:Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, hypertension, anorexia, dementia with behavioral disturbance and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R3 with severely impaired cognitive skills.On 8/12/25 at 5:05 p.m., R3 was observed in bed. The bed was in low position with no floor mats on either side of the bed. On 8/13/25 at 8:10 a.m., R3 was observed in bed. There were no protective floor mats on either side of the bed.R3's plan of care (revised 8/6/25) documented the resident was at risk of falls/injury due to history of falls, cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, poor vision and use of psychoactive medications. Interventions for fall/injury prevention included, Fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).The findings include:There was no documentation in Resident #1's clinical record regarding a physical assessment and actions taken in response to allegations of rough handling/sexual abuse.Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills.A facility reported incident form to the state agency dated 4/27/25 documented investigation of an allegation of sexual misconduct between R1 and a staff member.R1's clinical record documented a skin assessment dated [DATE] following the allegations but included no mention of any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement safety interventions consistent with the individualized needs and standards of practice for one of sixteen residents (Resident #4). Staff failed to appropriately position the safety interventions (bilateral floor mats) identified in Resident #4's care plan. In addition to the ongoing monitoring of effectiveness, Staff failed to perform a risk/safety assessment prior to implementing devices. The findings include: Resident #4 was observed in bed without protective floor mats being positioned properly as required in the plan of care for injury prevention. Resident #4 had bed bolster cushions in use for over six weeks without having a safety assessment prior to implementation. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, aphasia, cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation , resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate nutritional needs for the prevention of weight loss for one of 16 residents, Resident #1. Findings were: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to: encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/26/2023, assessed Resident #1 as moderately impaired with a cognitive summary score of 09 out of 15. 05/08/2023, Resident #1 was observed while finishing lunch in his room. Resident #1 had eaten 100% of the meal tray. When was asked about still being hungry, Resident #1 stated that he would like some milk. Resident #1 added, I like milk, but they don't give it to me. The clinical record was reviewed on 05/08/2023 at approximately 3:00 p.m. The weight section was reviewed and contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated on two of two medication carts. Undated multi-dose medication bottles were observed in the East Unit medication cart and the Central Unit medication cart. The findings include: 1. At 3:20 p.m. on 5/9/2023, an observation of the East Unit medication cart was conducted in the presence of RN # 2 (Registered Nurse). The medication cart included the following medications: A 32 oz (ounce) bottle of Milk of Magnesia (MOM) appeared to be nearly empty, but had no open date. A 16oz bottle of Geri Tussin Guaifenessin oral solution, with a punctured inner seal, but had no open date. A 16 oz bottle of Pro Stat, Wild Cherry flavor, that appeared to be nearly empty, but had no open date. Asked about expiration dates for the multi-use bottles of pills, RN # 2 said, I'm not sure. RN # 2 then turned to LPN # 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse), who was standing nearby, and asked what the open date meant on the multi-use bottles of pills. Oh, that's just the date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide dental services to one of 16 residents, Resident #1. Findings were: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to: encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/26/2023, assessed Resident #1 as moderately impaired with a cognitive summary score of 09 out of 15. During initial tour of the facility on 05/08/2023 at approximately 12:15 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in his room. While speaking, Resident #1's mouth was observed with no front upper or lower teeth. On 05/09/2023 at approximately 11:00 a.m., Resident #1 was about having a partial plate or dentures at the facility. Resident #1 stated, When I grew up, we didn't have much money, I still don't. These are all the teeth I have. Resident #1 opened to reveal approximately four teeth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store, serve, and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Findings were: Initial tour of the facility kitchen was conducted on 05/08/2023 at approximately 11:15 a.m., with the DM (dietary manager-other staff #1). Observed in the refrigerator next to the tray line was a plastic bag. When asked what was in the bag, the DM stated, Her lunch, nodding towards the staff member plating food on the tray line. Also observed in the refrigerator were canned sodas. When asked if those belonged to residents, the DM stated, No, employees .they shouldn't be in here and the lunch shouldn't be either. The bins storing flour, sugar, and thickening were observed. Scoops for each bin were to be stored inside the bin, affixed to the top, away from the food ingredients. The scoop for the sugar was observed out of place and laying down in the stored sugar. The can opener which was affixed to a table in the kitchen, was observed with dark, dried debris on the blade area that punctures the cans. When asked how often the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for three of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Residents #24, #30 and #41). The findings include: 1. Resident #24's clinical record inaccurately documented a physician's order for enhanced barrier precautions when the precautions had been discontinued since 4/20/23. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and anemia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #24 as cognitively intact. Resident #24's clinical record documented a current physician's order dated 3/29/23 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for infection control. The clinical record documented the precautions were implemented due to the resident's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter). The clinical record documented the PICC was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain floor mats and positioning cushions in clean/intact condition for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #4). The findings include: Resident #4's floor mats were dirty, and the surfaces were heavily torn with frayed edges. The coverings on the bolster cushions in Resident #4's bed had torn corners with exposed foam visible. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, aphasia, cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, dementia, psychotic/mood disturbance and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 with severely impaired cognitive skills and as requiring the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility. On 5/9/23 at 10:02 a.m., floor mats were observed on Resident #4's side of the room. One mat was observed rolled up by the bedside table and the other mat was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to identify and report an injury of unknown origin to the appropriate facility staff for one of 16 residents, Resident #258. Findings were: Resident #258 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to, Atrial fibrillation, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and urinary tract infection. Due to her recent admission, no MDS (minimum data set) information was available. Upon attempted interview with Resident #258, her speech was nonsensical and she was unable to answer questions. On 05/08/2023 at approximately 12:15 p.m., the initial tour of the facility was conducted. Resident #258 was observed sitting in a wheelchair outside of her room. An elongated area was observed on the right side of her head, from her scalp, down her forehead, running parallel to her hair line. The area was bluish/purple in color. When asked what had happened to her head, Resident #258 answered, I don't know it's [Name redacted]'s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint investigation, closed clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed for one of 16 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 107, to forward a notice of discharge to the local Ombudsman. Resident # 107 was transferred to the hospital without a notice of discharge being sent to the local Ombudsman. The findings were: Resident # 107, who was her own Responsible Party, was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included status post left femur fracture, history of malignant neoplasm of the breast, hypothyroidism, depression, hypertension, difficulty walking, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, peripheral vertigo, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, right hip pain, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and COVID-19. The Progress Notes in the resident's Electronic Health Record included the following entries: 12/30/2022 - 1930 (7:30 p.m.) - O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation) reported @ 75% on 5L/M (5 liters per minute). Resident positioned sitting up, alert and oriented. Administered prn (as needed) Duoneb treatment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure admission orders were in place for the care of suprapubic catheter for one of 16 residents, Resident #257. Findings were: Resident #257 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses including but not limited to: hypertension, pulmonary edema, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, pneumonia, urethral stricture, and pseudomonas pneumonia. Due to his recent admission, no MDS (minimum data set) information was available. When interviewed, regarding his care at the facility Resident #257 answered questions appropriately. During initial tour of the facility on 05/08/2023 at approximately 12:15 .pm., Resident #257 was observed lying supine on his bed. His pajama top was not pulled all the way down and a suprapubic catheter was observed. The clinical record was reviewed on 05/08/2023 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The physician order section contained the following order for the care of the suprapubic catheter: Cleanse and apply split sponge to suprapubic site daily . The care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a baseline care plan for the care of suprapubic catheter was in place for one of 16 residents, Resident #257. Findings were: Resident #257 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses including but not limited to: hypertension, pulmonary edema, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, pneumonia, urethral stricture, and pseudomonas pneumonia. Due to his recent admission, no MDS (minimum data set) information was available. When interviewed, regarding his care at the facility Resident #257 answered questions appropriately. During initial tour of the facility on 05/08/2023 at approximately 12:15 p.m., Resident #257 was observed lying supine on his bed. His pajama top was not pulled all the way down and a suprapubic catheter was observed. The clinical record was reviewed on 05/08/2023 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The physician order section contained the following orders for the care of the suprapubic catheter: Cleanse and apply split sponge to suprapubic site daily . The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #4). The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, aphasia, cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, dementia, psychotic/mood disturbance and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 with severely impaired cognitive skills and as requiring the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility. On 5/9/23 at 2:34 p.m., Resident #4 was observed seated in a wheelchair in his room. The resident had a pommel seat cushion in use with the wheelchair. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed an occupational therapy (OT) Discharge summary dated [DATE] recommending use of the pommel cushion to assist with proper positioning and fall prevention when in the wheelchair. Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #41). The findings include: Resident #41's plan of care was not revised regarding discontinued use of a Foley urinary catheter. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included vertebra compression fractures, atrial fibrillation, sepsis, pneumonitis, urinary tract infection, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety, asthma, congestive heart failure, urine retention and kidney failure. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #41 as cognitively intact. Resident #41's plan of care (revised 4/19/23) documented the resident required a urinary catheter due to retention and diagnosed bladder infection. Interventions to prevent catheter complications and resolve infection included changing catheter as ordered, anchoring catheter, provision of privacy bag, monitoring urine for dark or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint investigation, closed clinical record review, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed for one of 16 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 107, to administer medications in a timely manner. Six medications, administered by two different nurses, were given between 2 hours and 43 minutes, and 4 hours and 45 minutes late. The findings were: Resident # 107, who was her own Responsible Party, was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included status post left femur fracture, history of malignant neoplasm of the breast, hypothyroidism, depression, hypertension, difficulty walking, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, peripheral vertigo, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, right hip pain, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and COVID-19. As a part of the complaint investigation process, the Medication Admin Audit Report was reviewed. Review of the report revealed the following medications were administered late. Docusate Sodium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the treatment of a pressure ulcer for one of 23 resident's. Resident #6 did not have physician ordered elbow protector in place. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for Resident #6 included; Hemiplegia, contractures, bursa right elbow, dementia, and pressure ulcers. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/30/23. Resident #6 was assessed with long and short-term memory problems and severely cognitively impaired. On 5/8/23 Resident #6's clinical record was reviewed. An active physician's order read: Right Elbow: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, Apply Silver Alginate, Collagen Particles, cover with kerlix and elbow protector. Review of Resident #6's most recent skin assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #6 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer to the right elbow. On 5/8/23 at 2:25 PM Resident #6 was observed lying in bed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #24). The findings include: Oxygen was administered to Resident #24 at 4 lpm (liters per minute) when the physician's order required a rate of 2 lpm. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and anemia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #24 as cognitively intact. On 5/9/23 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #24 was observed in bed with oxygen being administered at 4 lpm via a nasal cannula. Resident #24's oxygen was observed again on 5/9/23 at 2:11 p.m. running at 4 lpm. Resident #24's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 4/12/23 for oxygen at 2 lpm via nasal cannula. On 5/9/23 at 2:20 p.m., the licensed practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess one of sixteen residents (Resident #4) for entrapment risks, attempt alternatives, or obtain informed consent prior to use of bed rails. The findings include: Resident #4, with multiple falls from the bed, had no assessment for bed rails, which were in use with bolster cushions, no documented attempts at alternatives to the rails and no informed consent from the resident's responsible party about risks/benefits of the bed rails. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, aphasia, cardiomyopathy, adult failure to thrive, dementia, psychotic/mood disturbance and anxiety. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 with severely impaired cognitive skills and as requiring the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility. On 5/8/23 at 2:05 p.m., Resident #4 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, facility document review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to respond to call bells in a timely manner for 5 of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident #15, #50, #45, #6 and #34. All five residents stated that due to staffing, it takes a long time to answer call bells. Staffing issues were also annotated in the July resident council minutes. The findings include: Resident #15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a Quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #15 as cognitively intact for daily decision making with a score of 15 out of 15. On 07/27/2021 at 10:51 a.m. during the initial tour, Resident #15 was interviewed regarding call bell response time. Resident #15 stated, I have to wait 15 to 30 minutes sometimes. I have to stay in the bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] minutes. I used to time them, but my watch is broken. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one of eighteen residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. An admission MDS for Resident #45 inaccurately assessed the presence of pressure ulcers. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right hip peri-prosthetic fracture, humerus fracture, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, hypothyroidism and urinary tract infection. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed Resident #45 as cognitively intact. A weekly skin evaluation sheet dated 6/25/21 documented the resident was assessed upon admission with the following skin impairments: Left buttock - stage II pressure ulcer measuring 0.5 x 0.3 x 0.0 (length x width x depth in centimeters); Sacrum - skin tear measuring 0.8 cm x 0.5 cm x 0 cm. The assessment documented, Alevyn foam to sacrum and left buttock q [every] three days. Bruising to right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of eighteen residents in the survey sample, Resident #24. Resident #24 had no plan of care regarding behaviors and use of an anticoagulant. The findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, rectal prolapse, congestive heart failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic kidney disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, hypertension and gout. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #24 with severely impaired cognitive skills. Resident #24's clinical record documented the resident was admitted with a diagnosis that included dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident #24's clinical record documented the following nursing behavior notes. 3/11/21 - .Increasingly agitated with staff when asked to sit down .re-direct with no success . 3/16/21 - Resident exit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of eighteen residents in the survey sample, Resident #24. Nursing failed to document an incident and physical assessment of Resident #24 after a hairbrush was found in her incontinence brief. The findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, rectal prolapse, congestive heart failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic kidney disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, hypertension and gout. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #24 with severely impaired cognitive skills. On 7/29/21 at 8:17 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about Resident #24's behaviors related to use of the antipsychotic medication Seroquel. The DON stated the resident rummaged in others' belongings, was exit seeking and had a recent incident of putting a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. Fluid intake was not monitored and documented for Resident #6. The findings include: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, type 2 diabetes, depression, end stage renal disease, renal dialysis dependent, colostomy, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #6 as alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. On 07/27/2021 Resident #6's clinical record was reviewed. Observed on the physician's order summary was the following order: .1500ml (milliliters)/day fluid restriction every shift. Order Date: 07/23/2021. Start Date: 07/23/2021 . Observed on the care plans was the following focus area: .The resident has potential fluid deficit/excess r/t (related to) dialysis, non-compliant with fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform a pressure ulcer dressing change in a manner to prevent infection for one of eighteen residents in the survey sample. Nursing failed to follow infection control practices during a dressing change to Resident #45's pressure ulcers. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right hip peri-prosthetic fracture, humerus fracture, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, hypothyroidism and urinary tract infection. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed Resident #45 as cognitively intact. Resident #45's clinical record documented the resident was currently treated for a stage 2 pressure injury on the sacrum and the left buttock. A physician's order dated 7/21/21 required cleansing the pressure ulcers with wound cleanser, Hydrogel to the wound bed, and a silicone foam dressing each day. On 7/28/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure proper wheelchair positioning for 1 of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36. Resident #36 was observed seated in a wheelchair without footrests and her feet not touching the floor. The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, dysphasia, depression, anxiety, and gastro-esophageal acid reflux (GERD). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a Quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #36 as severely impaired for daily decision making and having long and short term memory problems. Under Section G - Function Status, the MDS assessed Resident #36 requiring extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance for locomotion /mobility with the use of a wheelchair. On 07/27/2021 during the initial tour, Resident #36 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide a rational for pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36 and Resident #24. The facility physician failed to provide a rational for a pharmacy recommendation for Donepezil 10 mg (Aricept) and Memantine 5 mg (Namenda). The facility physician failed to provide a rational for a pharmacy recommendation for Seroquel for Resident #24. The findings include: 1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, dysphasia, depression, anxiety, and gastro-esophageal acid reflux (GERD). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a Quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #36 as severely impaired for daily decision making and having long and short term memory problems. On 07/28/2021 Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed including the pharmacy consultation report for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a medication pass observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 %. A medication pass resulted in two errors out of 27 opportunities for an error rate of 7.41%. The findings include: On 7/27/21 at 3:52 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3) was observed preparing and administering medications to Resident #46. Included in medications administered to Resident #46 was aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) enteric coated and two tablets of Senna 8.6 mg. Resident #46's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 6/28/21 for aspirin 81 mg chewable to be administered once per day for heart health. The record documented a physician's order dated 6/28/21 for Senna Plus (senna + docusate) 8.6 mg/50 mg with instructions for two tablets to be administered twice per day for constipation prevention. On 7/28/21 at 11:46 a.m., the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN #1) was interviewed about orders not followed for the aspirin and Senna during the medication pass to Resident #46. RN #1 reviewed the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during a dressing change for one of eighteen residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. A nurse failed to perform timely hand hygiene and glove changes during a dressing change for Resident #45 and applied topical medication to two wounds using the same applicator. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right hip peri-prosthetic fracture, humerus fracture, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, hypothyroidism and urinary tract infection. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed Resident #45 as cognitively intact. Resident #45's clinical record documented the resident was currently treated for a stage 2 pressure injury on the sacrum and the left buttock. A physician's order dated 7/21/21 required cleansing the pressure ulcers with wound cleanser, Hydrogel to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for one of 16 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45). Resident #45, who was identified as needing to be fed, was fed by a staff member who stood over the resident while feeding him. The findings include: Resident #45, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, poly-osteoarthritis, hyperlipidemia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, depression, mood disorder, bipolar disorder and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], was a significant change assessment and assessed Resident #45 as being severely cognitive impaired with a score of 0 out of 15. The MDS dated [DATE], under Section G (Functional Status), at item G0110 (H), Eating, assessed Resident #45 as requiring extensive assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for two of 16 resident's, Resident's #2 and #37. 1. The facility did not make an orthopedic appointment as ordered by the physician for Resident #2. 2. Resident #37 was not administered calcium carbonate as ordered by the physician. The Findings Include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included: Muscle Weakness, rheumatoid arthritis, and difficulty walking. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/18/19. Resident #2 was assessed as being cognitively intact with a score of 15 of 15. On 03/05/19 at 2:21 PM, Resident #2 was interviewed. When asked about any concerns of pain, Resident #2 verbalized that she has pain to the right knee and it had been going on for quite some time. On 3/6/19 Resident #2's medical chart was reviewed. A physicians progress note dated 2/4/19 documented […
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide supervision for fall prevention for one of 16 residents in the survey sample. Resident #18, with cognitive impairment, poor safety awareness and need for extensive assistance with transfers, fell after being left unsupervised on the commode. The findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #18 included dementia, high blood pressure, glaucoma, right eye blindness, heart disease, anemia, anxiety and cerebral infarction. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #18 with severely impaired cognitive skills. MDS assessments dated 1/15/19 and the previous assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had impaired vision and required the extensive assistance of one person for toileting. Resident #18's clinical record documented a nursing note dated 12/30/18 stating, Resident had fall in bathroom while attempting to transfer self . A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,636 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPOMATTOX HOLDINGS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/28/2021 |
| AK 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| AL 2003 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CENTRAL BAY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| GOLDEN 2017 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MATT 2002 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| MRCZ CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 & FAMILY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| NATHAN 5604 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| PIVOTAL CENTRAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAS 1998 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/28/2021 |
| COOK II, TIMOTHY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/26/2023 |
| RYBST CENTRAL MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/28/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495188. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-05-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.