No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation Center

154 North Artizan Street, Williamsport, MD 21795 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (301) 223-7971 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (105) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3 Byrkit Dr · (301) 582-1150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 E Potomac St · (301) 223-4101 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11841 Newgate Blvd · (301) 223-1161 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(740) 207-7836 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms78.3%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.8%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.8%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.7%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.701.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.641.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 416 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 215 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.7%CMS range 54.4–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.7–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified41.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting53.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge83.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 4.3–8.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
53.0%
Total nursing turnover
64.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 120.0 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
36
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

105 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 93 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that residents' choice to not have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was honored. This was evident for 2 (#8 and #7) of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives. As a result of these findings, a state of immediate jeopardy (IJ) was declared on [DATE] at 3:20 PM and an IJ summary tool was provided to the facility at that time. The facility submitted the first draft of their plan to remove the immediacy on [DATE] at 4:43 PM and it was not accepted. The facility submitted a second draft at 5:35 PM, and it was not accepted. The third draft was submitted on [DATE] at 6:16 PM and the facility's written plan to remove the immediacy was accepted on [DATE] at 6:31 PM with an alleged date of compliance of [DATE]. After removal of the immediacy, the noncompliance was determined to continue with a scope and severity of F. The findings include:On [DATE] at 9:55 AM an interview with Unit Manager (UM) #13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that care and services were provided to assist all residents in achieving their highest practicable level of wellbeing. This was evidenced by: 1) facility staff's failure to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by a nurse providing a treatment without a physician's order which resulted in an injury to a resident requiring treatment at an emergency room (Resident #250) 2) failure to ensure that tests for monitoring for potential medication side effects were completed as ordered and the failure to obtain blood sugars four times a day as ordered, that was evident for 2 (Resident #74, #59) out of 7 residents selected for unnecessary medication review, 3) the facility staff's failure to ensure that arm protectors were provided as prescribed by the physician for 1 (#35) of 13 residents reviewed for Abuse, 4) the facility staff failure to identify and follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure injuries receive appropriate services for treatment and prevention. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include:Resident #1 was a newly admitted resident of the facility. The care for the resident's pressure injuries was indicated in the report related to complaint3023604. On 6/16/26 at 11:22 AM, Resident #1 was observed sleeping in bed. The resident's bed was equipped with an air mattress with the control box located at the foot of the bed. The firmness setting was a dial with different weight selections that go up to 350 then max firmness. The Dial was observed to be turn all the way to max firmness. A review of Resident #1's medical record was conducted on 6/16/26 at 11:29 AM. The review revealed an order for the nurses to check the resident's air mattress indicated for wound healing, for placement, function and comfort each shift. Also, the resident's most recent weight was 178.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility discharged their residents inappropriately. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include:MDS (Minimum Data Set) - is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. On 5/6/26 at 10:00 AM a review of intake #2991200, revealed the complainant felt Resident #3 was inappropriately discharged home. A medical record review for Resident #3 on 5/6/26 at 10:08 AM a medical record review revealed an MDS with ARD of 4/8/26 that documented the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 4/20/26 a Notice of Medicare Noncoverage (NOMNC) signed by the resident documented the resident's last covered day was 4/22/26. A progress note written by Social Services Staff #8 on 4/21/26 revealed the resident appealed the decision, but the decision was upheld. She wrote another progress note on 4/22/26 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to document a resident's discharge as required. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #4) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include:1) A medical record review for Resident #3 on 5/6/26 at 10:08 AM revealed a discharge summary on 4/23/26 written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #10 which noted the resident was discharged on 4/23/26. Further review revealed no discharge note was written by nursing to indicate how the facility staff provided a safe and orderly discharge. A review of the discharge instructions in the assessment tab revealed they had been completed by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). A review of the document tab (documents that were uploaded into the computer) revealed discharge instructions were uploaded and had a handwritten note on them that they were given via telephone. There was no date/time or signature of who provided them over the phone. An interview with the ADON conducted on 5/7/26 at 10:25 AM revealed on the day of discharge staff were to print the discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide quality of care to their residents. This was evident for 1 (#1) of 1 resident reviewed for falls.The finding include:Neurological Assessments (neurochecks): an assessment conducted by nurses that includes a full set of vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, respirations, and temperature), check pupils for size and reaction to light, weakness on one or both sides, and level of consciousness. The purpose of the neurochecks is to monitor the resident for symptoms to indicate a brain injury following a fall in which the resident is known to have hit their head or if it is unknown.A medical record review for Resident #1 on 5/8/26 at 9:02 AM revealed a post fall assessment dated [DATE] that documented the resident had a fall, but the time of the fall was unclear. A review of the neurocheck assessment revealed that the nurse completed one for the required timeframes but failed to include a full set of vital signs for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their residents were free of accidents/hazards. This was evident for 1 (#1) of 1 resident reviewed for falls. The finding include:A medical record review for Resident #1 on 5/8/26 at 9:02 AM revealed a care plan for the resident's risk of falls that was initiated on 11/17/25. The goal was that the resident would not have an injury from a fall with 2 interventions in place; to keep commonly used items nearby and remind the resident to use the call light. The attending physician documented during a resident visit on 11/18/26 that the resident had dementia and abnormality with their walking. Review of the assessments revealed a post fall assessment was completed for the resident on 11/21/25. Facility staff documented that the resident was found on the floor near their bed. A review of the care plan for resident's risk of falls revealed staff updated it to read the resident had an actual fall on 11/24/25, 4 days after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide residents with their right to privacy of personal information by holding care plan meetings in their rooms with roommates present. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 1 resident reviewed for privacy concerns. The findings include: On 12/3/25 at 9:52 AM a review of a complaint received by the state agency (SA) on 8/15/25 revealed that Resident (R)3 had a care plan meeting that was held in his/her room with the roommate present. The complainant reported that the roommate made a comment during the meeting to indicate that they were listening. The complainant reported that when it was brought to the attention of the staff holding the meeting, they were informed that this was how they conducted the meetings since COVID 19 pandemic. On 12/8/25 at 3:59 PM a review of the letter sent to R3's representative regarding the care plan meeting revealed that it specifically stated that the meeting was to be held in the resident's room. In addition, it was noted that the meetings were 20 minutes in length. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for their residents. This was evident for 1 (Unit A) of 2 units observed for cleanliness. The findings include: An observation on 12/1/25 at 12:04 PM of the A unit revealed in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] the floor was carpeted and visibly soiled near the doorway. There was debris on the floor. A second observation on 12/9/25 at 2:29 PM revealed several rooms had crumbs and debris on the floor and in the hallway. room [ROOM NUMBER] A, 214 A and B, 216 A and B had crumbs and debris under the beds. In the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] and 219 there was debris scattered. The door to the room with the ice chest had a cup lid laying in the corner to the left of the door. On 12/8/25 at 10:25 AM an interview with Environmental Director (ED) revealed that housekeeping staff were responsible for ensuring that the residents' room floors and unit hallways were free of debris. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide incontinent care for a resident in need of these services. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 2 residents reviewed for incontinent care. The findings include: On 9/18/25 the State Agency (SA) received a complaint that the Resident (R)5 did not receive incontinent care on 9/16/25 and on 9/17/25. The complainant noted that there was a strong smell of urine in the resident's room and that the brief and bed were saturated with urine on both days. On 12/10/25 at 10:00 AM a review of the facility's assignment sheets for the unit where R5 resided were reviewed. On 9/16/25 on night shift there was 1 nurse and 1 geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) scheduled to care for 35 residents. On 9/16/25, during the day shift there was 1 nurse and 2 GNAs scheduled to care for 34 residents. On 9/16/25, during the evening shift there was 1 nurse and 3 GNAs scheduled to care for 32 residents. On 9/17/25, there were 32 residents and during night shift there was 1 nurse and 1.5 GNAs (because 1 GNA was split between 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have adequate staff to ensure that residents were bathed, dressed, and out of bed in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 2 units observed.The findings include:On 2/11/26 at 11:00 AM Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #2 was overheard asking 2 different people if they could assist with getting a resident out of bed. A subsequent observation revealed they were going into Resident #1's room to get the resident out of bed and a mechanical lift was in the room. (Mechanical lift transfers required staff members to safely transfer a resident).On 2/12/26 at 12:56 PM Resident #1 and Resident #2 were still in bed and eating their lunch. At 2/12/26 at 1:24 PM GNA #2 was observed getting Resident #2 out of bed. A subsequent interview with GNA #2 when she was coming out of the room revealed this was the first time she had time to get Resident #2 out of bed. A medical record review for Resident #1 on 0/11/26 at 10:41 AM failed to reveal a preference to get out of bed after lunch. On 2/12/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement corrective action when they determined that staff had inaccurate and inconsistent code status information on residents' medical records which resulted in residents receiving unwanted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). This failure led to another resident receiving unwanted CPR for the same reason. This was evident for 11 of 11 months of QAPI meeting minutes reviewed. The findings include:1. On [DATE] at 3:23 PM a medical record review for Resident (R)8 revealed in the miscellaneous tab there were 2 active Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) forms uploaded. The MOLST dated [DATE] documented the resident wished to be a full code and the one dated [DATE] documented the resident wished not to have CPR, but to die naturally. Further review of the medical record revealed a progress note dated [DATE], that documented the resident was found unresponsive and CPR was initiated. Staff failed to document the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 93 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and a review of pertinent documents, the facility failed to follow the required procedure for addressing residents' grievances. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 3 residents reviewed for personal property during a survey.The findings include:On 7/15/2025 at 10:09 AM, Resident #6, who was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation, reported that one of her/his long pants was missing. S/he stated that this had been reported to a facility staff member.On 7/17/2025 at 11:20 AM, the Director of Social Services and Discharge Planning (Staff #3) was interviewed. She confirmed that she did not have a grievance form regarding the resident's missing pants.On 7/17/2025 at 11:24 AM, the Director of Social Work & Discharge Planning (Staff #3) was interviewed. She reported that a resident or family member can report grievance either electronically or verbally to a staff member. A staff member who receives a grievance is expected to document it online. The grievance is then sent to the appropriate department, and the actions taken to resolve the grievance are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with facility staff and review of the dietary supervisor credentials, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a full-time qualified dietetic service supervisor for oversight of food preparation and daily kitchen operation.The findings include:On 7/15/25 at 8:10AM an observation of the facility kitchen was made. During the interview the kitchen manager (Staff #13) reported that her highest level of credentials were in serv safe. She reported that she was in the process of taking the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) class. She reported that she received consultation from the Regional Dietary Manager. On 7/18/25 at 10:17 AM an interview was conducted with the Regional Dietary Manager (Staff #31). He reported that he was just filing in with the regular dietary manager. Dietary Manager (Staff #31) reported he was not sure he reviewed his certificated dietician certification (CDM), but he would look for it and provided it to the survey team. No CDM certification was provided prior to the end of the survey.On 7/21/2025 9:32 AM during an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment. This was evident for eight of eight days of environmental observations.The findings include: On 7/15/2025 at 8:20 a.m., the surveyor noted a strong odor of urine in the C-wing and observed stains on the carpeting throughout the C-wing.On 7/15/2025 at 10:20 a.m., the surveyor interviewed Resident #33 and their family member. Both expressed concerns about the facility's cleanliness. The family member pointed to the carpet near the resident's bed and stated that it was filthy. The surveyor observed heavy staining on the carpet in that area.On 7/15/2025 at 3:37 p.m., Resident #33's family member called the surveyor to express continued concerns, stating that the facility had drastically gone downhill, especially regarding cleanliness. They commented, We knew something was going on because there was more cleaning and staff here today than ever, referring to the presence of surveyors in the building.On 7/16/2025 at 9:56 a.m., the surveyor noted that the strong urine smell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper storage of medications. This was evident for 1) three of five medication storage areas reviewed, 2) one unsecured storage room (C-Wing), 3) inappropriate temperature control and ice buildup in two refrigerators (C-Wing and A-Wing), and 4) the presence of food items in a medication refrigerator (West View Heights).The findings include: Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper storage of medications. This was evident for 1) one medication room that was unable to be secured (C-Wing) of three medication rooms reviewed, 2) two medication refrigerators kept at inappropriate temperatures in two of three medication storage rooms (C-Wing and A-Wing), 3) one medication refrigerator that contained food on one (West View Heights) of three medication rooms observed, 4) one unlocked medication cart of two medication carts reviewed on canal side terrace B unit, and 5) one unlocked treatment cart of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the resident's/resident representative's right to access personal and medical records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #133) of 2 residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include:A review of the intake information related to MD00217274 indicated that Resident #133's representative had requested medical records after the resident's death and was wrongfully denied the request.In an interview with the resident representative on 7/17/25 at 12:31 PM, s/he reported filling out a medical records request form at the front desk of the facility. Then after some time, had received a phone call from a facility staff informing him/her that the request was denied and no further explanation was provided.The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 7/23/25 at 2:16 PM. During the interview, she reported the process to request medical records and indicated that a record request form is filled out and submitted to the medical records coordinator (Staff #44) to be processed.On 7/23/25 at 2:45 PM, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from verbal and psychosocial abuse. This was evident for two (Resident's #13 and #52) out of six residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include:1. Resident #13 has a medical history of heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression.On 7/15/2025 at 2:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed Facility-Reported Incident (FRI) #335325 in which Resident #13 alleged they were subjected to verbal and emotional abuse. The facility investigated the allegation and substantiated findings of verbal and psychosocial abuse by a nursing assistant (GNA #20).According to the facility report, Resident #13 stated that GNA #20 consistently acted rudely, refused to assist, stated she did not have time to help, and told the resident to stop going home because all [you] do is fall. The facility investigation included a statement from GNA #20, who admitted to making inappropriate comments, including that other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin. This was evident for one (Resident #33) out of six reviewed for abuse.The findings include: Resident #33 has a medical history of hypertensive heart disease, bladder and fecal incontinence, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, and require assistance with personal care.On 7/15/2025 at 3:37 PM, the surveyor received a phone call from Resident #33's family member, who expressed concerns regarding a prior incident they believed had not been investigated. The family member reported that, a few weeks earlier, they received a phone call from the facility around 7:00 PM. When they attempted to return the call, they were unable to reach anyone. They then contacted Resident #33 directly, who was reportedly very upset and stated that their [private] area was bleeding. The family member indicated that they had reported this concern to the facility. According to the family member, the facility checked Resident #33's fingernails to see if they had caused the injury by scratching but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin. This was evident for one (Resident #33) out of six reviewed for abuse.The findings include:Resident #33 has a medical history of hypertensive heart disease, bladder and fecal incontinence, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, and require assistance with personal care.On 7/15/2025 at 3:37 PM, the surveyor received a phone call from Resident #33's family member, who expressed concerns regarding a prior incident they believed had not been investigated. The family member reported that, a few weeks earlier, they received a phone call from the facility around 7:00 PM. When they attempted to return the call, they were unable to reach anyone. They then contacted Resident #33 directly, who was reportedly very upset and stated that their [private] area was bleeding. The family member indicated that they had reported this concern to the facility. According to the family member, the facility checked Resident #33's fingernails to see if they had caused the injury by scratching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately reflect residents skin assessment on the MDS assessment. This was evident for one (Resident #11) out of two reviewed for pressure ulcer care.The findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of residents in long-term care facilities. The information gathered assists facilities in developing patient-centered care plans based on the resident's unique needs. The MDS assessment is a mandated requirement for all residents.Resident #11 is legally blind, has a medical history of a stroke (cerebral infarction), is incontinent of bowel and bladder, and requires assistance with personal care.On 7/22/25 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor performed a record review of Resident #11's MDS assessment dated [DATE]. Section M, Skin Conditions, revealed the following: Section M0300, Current Number of Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries at Each Stage, was coded as zero or none for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their hearing abilities. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #13) out of 2 residents reviewed for sensory/communication during a survey.The findings include:On 7/16/2025 at 9:11 AM, Resident #13, a long-term resident of the facility, reported that s/he has hearing aids but stated that staff don't have time to put them in. The surveyor observed that the resident was not wearing hearing aids.On 07/23/2025 at 10:16 AM, a review of the Care Plan failed to show any reference to Resident #13 having hearing aids.On 07/23/2025 at 10:21 AM, a review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] under the Sensory Communication section revealed that the resident was hard of hearing. Further review showed documentation stating that the resident did not have hearing aids.On 07/23/2025 at 10:24 AM, during an interview with Nurse (Staff #15), he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer wound care as ordered by a physician. This was evident in two (Resident's #11 and #33) of two reviewed for pressure ulcer care.The findings include:1). Resident #11 is legally blind and has a history of stroke (cerebral infarction), urinary incontinence, aphasia (a language disorder that affects the ability to communicate), skin disorders, and requires assistance with all personal care.On 7/22/25 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's care plan, which documented the following: The resident has an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum and is at risk for wound deterioration and the development of additional wounds due to inability to turn and reposition independently and moisture-associated skin damage. The resident is at risk for pressure ulcers related to decreased mobility. Interventions include assessing the resident for risk of skin breakdown, keeping skin clean and dry, performing skin assessments as indicated. The resident is noted to have impaired tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a urine collection bag was secured below the bladder. This was evident for 1 (Resident #73) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The findings include:A Foley catheter is a device that drains urine (pee) from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't pee on your own or for various medical reasons. Another name for a Foley catheter is an indwelling urinary catheter.Resident #73 was admitted in early 2023 with diagnoses that include chronic kidney disease. On 7/15/25 at 9:54 AM, Resident #73 was observed during the initial pool of the survey. The resident was in bed in the lowest position and a tube was observed sticking out on the side of the bed from the resident's blanket. An amber colored fluid was observed on the tubing.The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #5) assigned to care for Resident #73 was interviewed on 7/15/25 at 9:57 AM, in the resident's room. During the interview, LPN #5 lifted the resident's blanket and revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper monitoring of a resident receiving nutrition through a gastrostomy tube. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding during the survey.Findings include:On 7/16/25, a review of Resident #6's medical records revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation and received nutrition via a gastrostomy tube.A gastrostomy tube (G-tube) is a flexible plastic tube inserted through a small opening in the abdomen directly into the stomach. It enables delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medications when a person cannot eat or swallow normally.On 7/16/25, a review of Resident #6's weight records revealed the following:On 6/6/25, the resident weighed 180 lbs.On 7/1/25, the resident weighed 177 lbs.On 7/21/25, a review of medical orders failed to reveal an order for weights. However, further review revealed the following order: Check for residual prior to feeding every shift. If it is greater than 120 mL, hold feeding for 1 hour and recheck. If residual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided according to the physician's order. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care.The findings include: During the initial pool of the survey, Resident #5 was observed on 7/15/25 at 9:11 AM. During the observation, the resident was in bed receiving oxygen via nasal canula, set at a rate of 3 liters per minute.On 7/15/25 at 11:33 AM, Resident #5's medical order was reviewed and revealed an oxygen therapy order of 2 liters per minute via nasal canula.The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #5) assigned to care for Resident #5 was interviewed on 7/15/25 at 12:40 PM. During the interview, LPN #5 confirmed that the resident was currently receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute. LPN #5 was asked if she knew what the order was for the resident's oxygen therapy. LPN #5 stated, I'm not sure what his/her orders are and indicated that she would check the computer.After reviewing the orders at 12:44 PM, LPN #5 confirmed that the rate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to the resident based on professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management. The findings include:Resident #139 was newly admitted into the facility. In an interview with the resident on 7/16/25 at 9:24 AM, s/he reported that s/he was taking pain medication but was not helping that much.Tramadol is used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain, including pain after surgery. It is also used to treat pain severe enough to require opioid treatment and when other pain medicines did not work well enough or cannot be tolerated. A review of Resident #139 medical record on 7/24/25 at 9:08 AM revealed an order for Tramadol to be taken every 8 hours as needed for pain. The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for July 2025 revealed that the resident received the Tramadol 5x (7/16/25-5:20am; 7/17/25-1:10pm, 9:12pm; 7/21/25-3:13pm; and 7/22/25-4:26pm).There was no order or documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) received an annual performance review and 12 hours/year of in-service training for 2 (GNA #20 and GNA #21) out of 2 employee records reviewed during the survey.The findings include:Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) require a performance appraisal to be completed at least every 12 months to identify the potential for and receive at least 12 hours/year of in-service education. On 7/23/25 between 1:00 and 4:00 PM six employee training records were reviewed. On 7/24/25 at 9:18 AM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) it was revealed that the facility uses Relias, an online training and education application. It was also revealed that the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) tracks employees’ compliance of the training required. On 7/24/25 at 9:31 AM in an interview with the SDC (RN #19) it was revealed that her position was started in April 2025. She acknowledged that it was her responsibility to track staff compliance via Relias. On 7/24/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accurate documentation of controlled substances in the narcotics daily count logs. This was evident for two of two narcotic record books reviewed (A-wing and C-wing) during the medication administration observation task.The findings include:On 7/17/2025 at 8:44 AM, the surveyor observed and reviewed the narcotics log for the C-wing of the facility. The following discrepancies were identified: On 4/5/25 at 7:00 PM, 4/6/25 at 7:00 AM, and 4/10/25 at 11:00 PM, the narcotics log was not signed, and the count was not confirmed as correct. On 4/11/25 at 11:00 PM, the narcotic count was signed by only one staff member, instead of the required two signatures to validate the count.On 7/17/2025 at 9:16 AM, the surveyor conducted a further review of the narcotics log and noted that the following fields were incomplete:Narcotic Kit Sealed, Narcotic Kit Seal Number Verified, and Status of Count Exact. These fields were left blank on: 7/13/25 at 7:00 AM, 3:00 PM, and 11:00 PM 7/15/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provider responded to a recommendation made by a consulting pharmacist. This was evident for 1 (Resident #21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: A review of Resident #21's medical record was conducted on 7/17/25 at 8:18 AM. The review revealed a medication regimen review (MRR) report was conducted by the consultant pharmacist on 6/30/25.The consultant pharmacist indicated that Resident #21's order for Risperidone lacked an allowable diagnosis to support its use and listed several diagnosis/conditions for the provider to consider adding to the order. The report was signed by the Psychiatric-Mental health Nurse Practitioner (Staff #37) on 7/7/25 but failed to indicate a response to the recommendation.A review of Resident #21's medical order for Risperidone was conducted on 7/17/25 at 10:13 AM. The review revealed that the order for risperidone was last revised on 7/29/24 and still lacked the appropriate diagnosis to support its use. The Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on pertinent document review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with medications as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 Resident (resident #135) out of 4 residents reviewed for neglect during a survey. The findings include: On 7/22/25 8:00 the Review of a complaint submitted from a county agency revealed a concern that Resident #135 did not receive her/his medications on time.On 7/22/25 at 10:10 AM the surveyor requested the medication administration audit for Resident # 135 for the following dates: 2/26/25 through 3/03/25 07/22/2025 11:31 AM the Nurse Unit Manager (Staff # 8) was interviewed. She provided interpretation of the medication administration audit. She reported that the first column indicated what time the medication was ordered the second column indicated what time the medication was administered.On 7/22/2025 11:22 AM a review of the audit included but was not limited to the following medications not being administered according to professional standards.Medication: hydroxyzine HCL Oral Tablet, give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services to a Medicaid funded resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #21) of 3 residents reviewed for dental care.The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted into the facility in mid-2020. Medical records indicated that the resident had intact cognition.On 7/15/25 at 1:08 PM, Resident #21 was interviewed. During the interview, the resident was observed to have broken teeth and reported that s/he had not seen a dentist since being in the facility.On 7/16/25 at 3:13 PM, a review of the most recent comprehensive assessment of Resident #21, with a reference date of 5/1/25 indicated that the resident had an obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth.The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about dental services on 7/21/25 at 11:58 AM. during the interview, the DON reported that the facility uses Healthdrive as the group providing dental services to all residents since the facility's change of ownership in October of 2024. The DON explained that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective process to ensure that residents received their preferred beverages. This was evident for 4 (Resident #108, # 17, 90, #91) out of 6 residents observed for Dinning during a survey.The findingsOn 7/17/25 at 12:26 PM an observation was made of lunch trays delivered on the terrace unit. On 7/17/25 at 12:30 PM an observation of Resident #108's meal ticket indicated that milk was listed as part of the meal. However, observation of the food tray revealed that milk was not present. GNA (Staff # 11) confirmed that the milk was missing from the tray. On 7/17/25 at 12:30 PM an observation of Resident #17s meal ticket indicated that milk was listed as part of the meal. However, observation of the food tray revealed that milk was not present. Admissions Director (Staff #12) confirmed that the milk was missing from the tray. On 7/17/25 at 12:37 PM an observation of Resident #90's meal ticket indicated that milk was listed as part of the meal. However, observation of the food tray revealed that milk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was in good working order. This was evident for 1 (R#94) of 34 residents screened on the A Wing unit during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 7/15/2025 at 9:48 AM an observation of Resident #94's room was conducted. The resident was in bed, and an air mattress pump machine was seen hanging on the footboard. The electrical wires were lying on the floor, the ends were frayed, and none of the machine's indicator lights were on. The unit nurse (Staff #1) came into the room during the observation but was unaware of the non-functioning, broken air mattress pump until the surveyor informed her. She said she would call maintenance to fix it.On 7/17/2025 at 10:45 AM the A wing unit manager (Staff #22) was interviewed regarding Resident #94's air mattress. She said she was unaware that the resident air mattress pump was broken and further explained that all resident care equipment should be checked each shift. When asked for documentation that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had access to call bells and failed to ensure that call bells were maintained in working condition. This was evident for four of thirty-five residents reviewed (Residents #37, #92, and #112, #5) who did not have call bells within reach, and for two of twenty-seven residents (Residents #25 and #42) whose call bells were present but not functioning.The findings include: 1.) On 7/15/2025 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor began the initial screening of residents for the facility annual survey. On 7/15/2025 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #92 sitting at their bedside eating breakfast. The surveyor noted that the call bell had been placed in the resident's drawer, out of the resident's reach. Additionally, the surveyor observed their roommate, Resident #112, sleeping in bed with their call bell on the floor and out of reach. The surveyor saw the Unit Manager (Nurse #22) walking down the hallway and asked her about the facility's expectations regarding call bell placement. She confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to have a process to ensure that all grievances were investigated and received a response in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (#87 and #95) of 2 residents reviewed for the grievances. The findings include: 1) During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 8:08 AM, she reported that Resident #87 had requested to speak with a surveyor. The DON reported that this resident had an ongoing complaint about the number of staff assigned to the unit. She stated that when the resident used his/her call light, they expected it to be answered right away. She stated that when she had pulled the audit reports the resident's wait time was about 16 minutes. The DON stated they offered the resident a room change, but s/he had declined. An interview with Resident #87 on 4/2/25 at 8:46 AM, revealed that s/he had concerns with the number of staff assigned to their unit because s/he waited extended times for call light response. When asked if the resident had reported this concern to facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident (resident #59) from misappropriation of personal funds from a facility staff member. This was evident for 1 of 94 residents reviewed during an complaint survey. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed a complaint (MD00186172) sent to the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality in 12/22 alleging that facility staff made unauthorized charges on resident #59's credit card. Medical record review for resident #59 on 3/31/25 at 11:00am revealed the resident was transferred from the facility on 11/3/22 for a change in condition. The resident was expected to return to the facility, so the resident's belongings remained in the facility. On 3/31/25 at 11:20am, The surveyor interviewed the Administrator regarding the allegation of facility staff making unauthorized charges to resident #59's credit card in 11/22. The Administrator provided the surveyor with the facility investigation into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident (Resident #61) This was evident for 1 of 94 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/14/23, the facility reported an incident (Intake # MD00191371). Resident # 61 received a blister/burn from an incorrectly placed warm compress. Medical record review for resident #61 on 4/1/25 at 8:40am revealed a progress note dated 4/15/23 at 1:45pm which reported that the resident sustained a blister/burn to his/her right lower lateral foot after facility nursing staff applied a resident- requested warm compress. Surveyor review of the facility's investigation of the reported incident on 4/1/25 at 9:30am revealed the nursing staff reported an observed right lateral foot blister measuring 2.5cm x 1.2 cm on 4/15/23. Nursing staff applied a skin barrier ointment to the blister. Resident #61 did not complain of any pain. Nursing staff statement on 4/18/23 reported that the warm compress was applied to resident #61's right foot after request. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there were enough staff on duty to answer call lights in a timely manner for the residents. This was evident for 2 of 3 complaints for call bell response times. The findings include: 1) An interview with Resident #87 on 4/2/25 at 8:46 AM, revealed the resident had concerns about the call light response times. The resident recalled that s/he had waited a few hours for staff to answer his/her call light on a day in the last couple of weeks. The resident could not recall the exact date and thought it occurred between breakfast and lunch. The resident reported s/he needed assistance with incontinence care. The extended wait time for call lights was confirmed on 4/2/25 at 10:00 AM when a review of the call bell audits for 3/20/25 - 4/1/25 was conducted. Resident #87 waited 30 minutes to 3 hours for his/her call light to be answered. 2) An interview with Resident #95 on 4/3/25 at 9:01 AM, revealed that s/he had extended wait times when s/he put his/her call light to use the bathroom. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a complaint, medical record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer medications to residents without any significant medication errors by inappropriately administering insulin to 2 residents that were not diabetic. This was evident during the review of a complaint that affected 2 of 2 residents during a medication pass. The findings include: Complaint #MD00190191 was initiated on 3/27/25 at 11:31 AM regarding Resident #36. The allegation was that s/he was given insulin on 3/17/23 inappropriately as s/he is not diabetic. According to medical record review at this time, Resident #36 was admitted to the facility over 5 years ago for care related to a kidney/pancreas transplant, Resident #36 is also diagnosed as legally blind and monitored for hypoglycemia. Second, to the transplant, Resident #36 is not considered diabetic and does not take any insulin products. Review of the complaint #MD00190191 on 3/27/25 at 11:40AM revealed an allegation that on 3/17/23 Resident #36 was 'stuck in the arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement abuse policies and procedures. This was evident during the survey and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 6/16/22 at 12:24 PM, the Associate Administrator provided a copy of the Resident Abuse Reporting Policy and Procedure and reported that this was the version that was active. It was noted as Corporate Policy - Abuse 5-2017 in the bottom right corner of the policy. A review of the policy and procedure revealed that, on page 2, under Reporting Procedure: Maryland law requires employees to report all alleged violations involving resident neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, and misappropriation of property. The first bullet stated to report immediately or within 2 hours of forming the suspicion and the second bullet included documentation to report suspected abuse to the Administrator, or to the immediate supervisor who must then report to the Administrator. On page 3 of the document, it was noted that the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records, policies, and other pertinent documentation, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed 1) to ensure that staff completed the controlled drug count at the change of shift as evidenced by missing/inaccurate documentation by nursing staff that the count had been completed prior to the end of the shift, and 2) to ensure that nursing staff routinely signed that the count was correct at the change of shifts. This was evident for 6 (Rehab units 1 & 2, long-term care units A, B, and C) out of 6 medication carts reviewed for the controlled drug count verification sheet.The findings include: A controlled drug means a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction. The control applies to the way the substance is made, used, handled, stored, and distributed. Controlled substances include opioids, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, and anabolic steroids. (National Institutes of Health) Controlled Drug Count Verification is the shift count sheet for narcotics…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of relevant documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety as evidenced by the facility's failure to 1) have a cleaning schedule for the ice machine; 2) seal and label open containers of food; and 3) ensure that elevated temperatures in the nursing unit food refrigerators were reported to maintenance. This has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 6/6/22 at 10:00 AM, the following observations were made during a tour of the kitchen with the Executive Chef Staff #43: -Observation of the ice machine revealed scattered small black dots covering 3/4 of the ceiling of the ice machine. The executive chef was unable to locate a cleaning schedule for the ice machine and was unable to report when it was last cleaned. - In refrigerator #4, an opened bag containing hotdogs was observed unsealed. Three containers wrapped in foil were not labeled or dated. The executive chef identified these as cheese and removed them from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility administration failed to provide effective oversight activities for the facility to ensure that the facility had the resources and that those resources were used effectively in order to meet the health and safety needs of each resident and failed to identify and correct inappropriate care processes/standards, as evidenced by 1) failing to revise and update the facility's Resident Abuse Reporting Policy and Procedure, 2) failing to ensure that facility staff protected residents from abuse and neglect, 3) failing to ensure the facility reported investigations to the State Agency within the required time frame, 4) failing to ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated so that the necessary actions could be taken to prevent further abuse. The Administration's failure to ensure that processes were in place that could identify and correct deficient practices in care that had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of all the residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-24 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure staff who were not up to date with COVID immunizations, including unvaccinated staff, were tested according to state and federal guidelines. This was found to be evident for 19 out of 22 staff (Geriatric Nurse Aide #9, #18, #24, #27, #31, #39, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #55, Licensed Practical Nurse #1, #19, #32, Registered Nurse #34, #35, and Social Worker #21) not up to date staff reviewed for COVID-19 testing during the survey This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. The finding includes: COVID-19 Vaccine up-to-date means a person has received all recommended COVID-19 vaccines, including any booster dose(s) when eligible. (Center of Disease Control: CDC) The CDC has developed COVID-19 Community Levels to help communities decide what prevention steps to take based on the latest local COVID-19 data. Levels are determined each week for each county in the U.S. A county's risk level can be low,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-24 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with facility staff, a review of the facility's policies and procedures, and a review of the facility's testing documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures for testing staff who were granted an exception for COVID-19 vaccinations. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. The finding includes: On 6/22/22 at 09:40 AM, the facility's policy and procedure titled Vaccine Exemptions & Accommodations was reviewed. It stated, All unvaccinated employees are required to submit to twice-weekly testing (or more frequently if indicated by Federal, State, or Local law or guidelines or WRV) regardless of the community transmission rate. All results must be entered into the testing database, SimpleReport., and all unvaccinated staff are required to wear an N95 while in the facility unless eating or drinking during break times. The surveyor randomly selected 10 unvaccinated staff on 6/22/22 at 10:20 AM and reviewed their COVID-19 testing record from 5/1/22 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that 2 physicians' certificates of incapacity were obtained, and Advance Directives were completed as per the Health Care Decisions Act prior to allowing resident representatives to make informed health care decisions on the resident's behalf. This was evident for 7 (#97, #71, #83, #70, #35, #78 and #26) of 26 residents reviewed for advance directives during the survey. The findings include: Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life sustaining treatment options. According to the Health Care Decisions Act: 5-602 (d) (1) Any competent individual may make an oral advance directive to authorize the providing, withholding, or withdrawing of any life-sustaining procedure or to appoint an agent to make health care decisions for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that restorative nursing services were incorporated into residents' care plans and provided by staff as recommended upon discharge from therapy. This was found to be evident for 3 (#28, #7, #33) of 6 residents reviewed for decline in activities of daily living and positioning. The findings include: 1) On 6/7/22, Resident #28 was observed to have contractures in both hands. The resident confirmed that his/her hands had been like that since before admission to the facility. A contracture is a tightening of muscles that causes joints to become stiff, preventing normal movement of the joint. Contractures can be caused by inactivity. On 6/14/22, review of the medical record revealed orders for occupational therapy (OT) starting in January 2022. The OT orders were discontinued on 2/4/22. On 6/15/22, review of the 3/17/22 Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the resident had function range of motion impairment on both sides of the body in both upper and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for each resident as evidenced by: A) Failing to have an effective system in place to ensure that both paper and electronic versions of the MOLST forms were voided when a new MOLST was established for 6 (#97, #7, #71, #26, #35, and #70) of 13 residents reviewed for advance directives. B) Falsely documenting completion of treatment interventions that were not actually provided for 1 (#35) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. C) Failing to document resident behaviors as per the physician order for 1 (#201) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A) Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life sustaining treatment options. Once a MOLST order form is completed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) based on repeat deficiencies related to 1) resident abuse, 2) abuse policies and procedures, 3) timely reporting of allegations of abuse to the state agency, 4) conducting a thorough investigation of allegations of abuse, 5) physician notification for a resident's change in condition, 6) notice of bed hold policy, 7) respiratory care services, 8) residents unnecessary medications, 9) improper storage of medications, 10) inaccurate/incomplete medical records, and 11) posting of nursing staff for all units. This was evident for 1 recertification survey reviewed and 1 complaint survey reviewed. The failure to assess and correct identified deficient practices has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) On 6/23/22 at 4:15 PM, a review of a complaint survey that was conducted 9/23/20, 9/24/20 - 10/2/20, and 10/5/20 - 10/8/20, revealed that 4 complaints and 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document that education was provided regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine to residents and staff. This was evident for 2 (#21 and #71) of 5 residents and 4 (#28, #35, #46, and #47) of 4 facility staff members reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations during the survey. The findings include: On 6/16/22 at 4:20 PM, a medical record review was conducted for Resident #21. A consent form was found in the resident's paper chart marked as refused COVID-19 vaccine, dated 6/02/21. However, no documentation was found for evidence of education provided under the resident's paper chart or electronic medical record. A medical record review of Resident #71 was conducted on 6/17/22 at 8:00 AM. The resident signed a COVID -19 Vaccination Declination form on 10/13/21. However, there was no supportive documentation regarding the resident's education regarding the risks or benefits of receiving the vaccine. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to allow residents to exercise their rights as evidenced by staff throwing away old newspapers that belonged to a resident who had asked staff not to throw them away. This was evident for 1 (#63) of 61 residents reviewed. The findings include: On 6/6/22 at 3:16 PM during an interview with Resident #63 regarding the care and services that he/she received, Resident #63 reported that he/she had some old newspapers that had been thrown away by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #9 after Resident #63 had told her not to throw them away. Resident #63 reported that the cleaning person had come in and emptied the trash and now his/her papers were gone and he/she had wanted to keep them. Resident #63 stated that he/she had not reported this incident to facility staff. On 6/6/22 at 3:30 PM this incident was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) immediately following the interview. A follow up interview was conducted with the ADON on 6/14/22 at 8:39 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully inform the resident in a manner that they could understand of the reason for their special contact isolation isolation secondary to a possible C-Diff infection. This was evident for 1 (#513) of 15 residents reviewed. The finding includes: On 6/7/22 at 12:40 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #513. During the interview, the resident stated, I don't know why I need to be isolated, nobody explained why or how long I need to. I had no issue when I was in the hospital. On 6/13/22 at 9:39 AM, a review of the medical records revealed the resident was admitted to this facility on 5/28/22 for rehabilitation. The resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 15/15 on admission, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further record review revealed that Resident #513's physician ordered special contact isolation to be maintained for possible C.diff on 6/4/22. C. diff (also known as Clostridioides difficile or C. difficile) is a germ…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician when a resident's blood pressure was high. This was evident for 1 (#251) of 4 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: On 6/9/22 9:00 AM, at a review of complaint #MD00175512 was conducted. In the complaint, the complainant reported concerns related to the care that Resident #251 received while they resided in the facility. At that time, a review of Resident #251's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with multiple diagnosis including, but not limited to Hypertension, and had a history of Coronary (heart) artery disease, and had Coronary artery bypass grafting (surgery where a healthy blood vessel taken from another part of the body is used to make a new path for blood around a blocked artery leading to the heart. On 6/9/22 at 9:40 AM, during a phone interview, the complainant reported that following Resident #251's discharge from the facility, the complainant requested a copy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior. This was evidenced by the facility's failure to ensure that the resident's bathroom walls were clean and sanitary for 1 (#18) of 7 residents reviewed for general concerns. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #18 and his/her friend on 6/16/22 at 2:18 PM after the resident indicated that he/she would like the friend to participate in the interview. During the interview, the resident's friend indicated that housekeeping was in and out of the resident's room in 5 minutes and that many times, the floors had not been cleaned. The friend reported that there was a spot on the wall in the bathroom between the toilet and the sink, that it had been there for a while, and no one had cleaned it. Resident #18 added that he/she utilizes a bedpan and staff empty it in the toilet in the bathroom, Resident #18 stated they must have splashed it on the wall. An observation was made of the bathroom on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and investigative documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that grievances were thoroughly investigated and failed to ensure documentation of investigation follow up. This was found to be evident for 1 (#28) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey and 1 (#38) of 3 resident's reviewed for Personal Property. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #28's medical record on 6/7/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was observed to be alert and oriented and was able to be interviewed as part of the initial survey process. On 6/15/22, review of the Concern Reports pertaining to Resident #28 revealed two reports for May 2022. The first one was dated 5/27/22 and was in reference to a letter the resident's family member had submitted regarding an employee that had been talking disrespectfully. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their residents were free of abuse as evidenced by staff to resident abuse that was substantiated. This was evident for 1 (#61) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings Include: A medical record review for Resident #61 on 6/14/22 at 7:40 AM revealed an annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/22, which documented in section C that resident had scored a 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a standardized test to determine a resident's level of cognitive functioning) which indicated an intact cognition. Section E documented that Resident #61 had physically agressive behaviors directed towards others such as hitting and kicking. Also, it was noted that these behaviors occurred 1-3 days during the 7 days reviewed, and that it interfered with care. In section G it was documented that Resident #61 was totally dependent on staff to provide care. On 6/13/22 at 3:38 PM, a review of the Facility's Investigation file for the self-report MD00174072 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of physical restraints. This was evident for 1 (#509) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A physical restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device/equipment or material that limits a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be removed by the resident in the same manner as it was applied by staff. A gait belt or transfer belt is an assistive device put on a person who has mobility issues, by a care giver, prior to moving the person and can be used to help a person transfer from one surface to another, stand, or walk around. On 6/23/22 02:31 PM, a facility reported incident #MD001793 was reviewed. The facility's self-report indicated that the report was for abuse, and included documentation that, on 6/17/22 at approximately 7:00 PM, a nurse entered Resident #509's room and witnessed that Resident #509 had a gait belt around his body as well as his/her chair, confining the resident to the chair. Review of the facility's investigations into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, facility investigation documentation and other pertinent documents, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement abuse policies and procedures to ensure that facility staff appropriately identified and reported allegations of abuse to the Administrator immediately and to ensure that once the facility had been aware of an allegation of abuse that they reported it to the state agency within the required timeframes. This was evident for 4 (#28, #71, #61, and #35) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #28's medical record on 6/7/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was observed to be alert and oriented and was able to be interviewed as part of the initial survey process. On 6/14/22, review the facility reported incident MD00177857 revealed the resident reported to a nurse on 5/28/22 that on 5/26/22 GNA #13 stated you have a big butt. On 6/14/22 at 8:35 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and investigative documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that abuse allegations were thoroughly investigated to determine if abuse occurred and take appropriate action. This was found to be evident for 4 (#28, #35, #63, and #83) out of 13 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #28's medical record on 6/7/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was observed to be alert and oriented and was able to be interviewed as part of the initial survey process. On 6/14/22, review of the facility reported incident MD00177857 revealed that the resident reported to a nurse on 5/28/22 that, on 5/26/22, GNA #13 stated you have a big butt. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 6/14/22 at 8:35 AM revealed that she had spoken to the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed to accurately reflect the resident's status as evidenced by failure to accurately identify a resident's range of motion status. This was found to be evident for 2 (#74, #33) of 4 residents reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.On 6/9/22, review of Resident #74's medical record revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years. Since 5/3/22, the resident's diagnosis include contractures of left and right hip and both knees. A contracture is a tightening of muscles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that restorative nursing services were incorporated into resident care plans, 2) failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with limited range of motion and contractures and a resident with hypomagnesemia, 3) and failed to follow the care plan. This was evident for 3 (#74, #28, #7) of 4 residents reviewed for a decline in activities of daily living, 1(#88) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization, 1 (#33) of 4 residents reviewed for position/mobility, and 1 (#251) of 4 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 6/9/22, review of Resident #74's medical record revealed that the resident had resided at the facility for several years. The resident's diagnosis included contractures of left and right hip and both knees. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that the resident's plan of care was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after a quarterly review assessment. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 3 residents reviewed for skin assessments. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Resident #5's medical record was reviewed on 10/26/22 at 11:00 AM. The record revealed that 2 Plans of Care were developed related to Resident #5's skin integrity. The first: Potential for impaired skin integrity was initiated 8/8/16 and included an updated focus: 6/22/22, scratch to left lower jawbone. It indicated that it was revised on 10/3/22 but did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review medical records and facility policy, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received necessary respiratory care and services. This was evidenced by the facility staff's failure to properly date and label oxygen tubing when changed for 2 (#78 and #26) of 6 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care, and failed to ensure that care was provided in accordance with facility policy and the resident's plan of care for 1(#26) of 6 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The findings include: 1) On 6/7/22 at 11:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #78 sitting in a wheelchair at a table in the dining room, socializing with other residents. An oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates oxygen from the air) was behind the resident. The resident was wearing a nasal cannula (oxygen tube with nose prongs) that was connected to the concentrator. The tubing was not date labeled to indicate when it was last changed. When asked, the resident was unable to recall when it was last changed. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's progress notes accurately reflected the medications that the resident was currently receiving. This was found to be evident for 2 (#74 and #1) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1a) On 6/9/22,a review of Resident #74's medical record revealed that the resident had resided at the facility for several years. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, non-alzhiemer's dementia; anxiety, depression and a psychotic disorder not related to schizophrenia. The resident had been receiving the antipsychotic medication Seroquel for more than one year. On 6/13/22, review of the orders and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2022 revealed that the resident was receiving Seroquel 25 mg every morning and Seroquel 75 mg every evening at bedtime. On 6/13/22 at 11:03 AM, review of the psychiatric nurse practitioner's (#44) note, dated 6/6/22, revealed a section for Current Medications. This section included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post the required staffing information in a prominent place easily accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident for 1 (Canal Side Skylight) of 6 resident care areas observed during the survey. The findings include: The surveyor observed the C wing 3rd floor - Canal Side Skylight Unit on 6/6/22 at 10:49 AM. Access to the unit required travel via elevator or stairs that required entry of a code into a keypad to unlock. The unit consisted of 8 bedrooms, housing 11 residents. The surveyor was unable to find the unit staffing assignment posted in a prominent place accessible to residents and visitors. Further observation of several bedrooms on C wing 3rd floor including room [ROOM NUMBER], #304 and #310, confirmed that staffing information was not posted within the resident rooms. On 6/6/22 at 11:03 AM, Staff #45 was asked how the C wing 3rd floor Unit was staffed. She indicated that 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from unnecessary medications as evidenced by 1) failing to follow a physician's order to monitor a resident's blood sugar four times a day for a resident receiving insulin; and failure to follow the physician's order to hold the insulin injection when the blood sugar level was below 120 and 2) failing to discontinue a duplicate medication as ordered by the attending physician. This was found to be evident for 2 (#59 and #34) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/21/22, review of Resident #59's medical record revealed a diagnosis of diabetes and orders for insulin injections. Further review of the medical record revealed an order, with a start date of 5/11/22, for Fingerstick Blood Sugar levels four times a day and to contact the provider if the level was less than 70 or greater than 400. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the Fingerstick Blood Sugar levels were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications as evidenced by 1) the administration of as needed antianxiety medication in the absence of documentation of the need for or request of the medication. This was found to be evident for 1 (#1) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 6/22/22, review of Resident #1's medical record revealed diagnoses that included but not limited to depression and generalized anxiety disorder. The resident had an order, with a start date of 5/16/22, for Xanax every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days. Xanax, also known as alprazolam, is an antianxiety medication. Review of the May 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that Xanax was administered on 5/19, 5/24 and 5/30. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation of behaviors or requests that would indicate the need to administer the as needed antianxiety medication. Further review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policies review, it was determined that facility staff 1) failed to ensure documentation of a multi-use medication's expiration date when opened, 2) failed to discard medication bottles and medical supplies when expired, and 3) failed to develop policy and procedures for multi-use medication containers and follow the directions. This was evident in 2 of 5 rehab nursing units observed during random observations made during the survey. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 1:37 PM, the surveyor inspected a medication storage room on the [NAME] view 2nd-floor with Registered Nurse (RN) #34 attending. The surveyor observed that the Allergy relief medication bottle was opened with the handwritten date marked as 1/23. There was no expiration date marked on the bottle. The surveyor informed RN #34 of the finding. She stated that any opened multi-dose medication bottle would be located on the medication cart and opened bottle should not be placed in the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure lab results of COVID tests were kept in the resident's medical record. This was found to be evident for 3 (#74, #1 and #59) of 3 residents whose COVID testing results were reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/9/22, review of Resident #74's medical record revealed the resident resided at the facility for several years. Review of the Medication Administration Record for June revealed documenation to indicate that staff had obtained a Nasopharyngeal Swab for COVID testing on 6/1, 6/9 and 6/16/22. The most recent COVID test results found in the electronic health record were from October 2021. On 6/21/22, a review of Resident #74's paper chart failed to reveal documentation of COVID test results. 2) On 6/22/22, review of Resident #1's medical record revealed documenation to indicate staff had obtained a Nasopharyngeal Swab for COVID testing on 6/1, 6/9 and 6/16/22. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interview with the resident and staff, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to 1) ensure staff were performing hand hygiene between changing gloves, and 2) provide a safe and sanitary environment as evidenced by staff failure to store a resident's toothbrush in a sanitary manner. This was evident for 1 (Registered Nurse, RN #33) of 3 staff observed for medication administration during the survey and 1 (Registered Nurse, RN #33) of 3 staff observed for medication administration during the survey and this was evident for 1 (#18) of 61 resident's reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/10/22 at 9:56 AM, an observation was made for RN #33's wound care for Resident #200. RN #33 prepared her materials on the bedside table for the dressing, set up, performed hand hygiene, put on clean gloves, removed the old dressing, and removed the gloves. Without performing hand hygiene, she put on a new pair of gloves, proceeded to clean the wound, and apply the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to document that the residents and/or their Responsible Parties (RPs) were provided education on Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines before requesting consent, 2) failed to develop the policies and procedures to ensure that residents or RPs receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of Influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. This was evident for 5 (#21, #22, #57, #59, and #71) of 5 residents reviewed for Immunization during the survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal vaccine help prevents pneumococcal disease, which is any illness caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a pneumococcal vaccine for age [AGE] years or older and adults 19 through 64 with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease) Flu is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the walk in freezer was functioning in a manner that prevented ice build up, which included ice frozen to the floor; and failed to ensure unit refrigerators were maintained in a manner to keep items at safe temperatures. This was found to be evident for the one walk in freezer in the kitchen; and one of the six unit refrigerators used for storing food items. The findings include: 1) On 6/6/22 at 10:00 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with the executive chef, (#43) the walk in freezer was observed to have small frozen mounds observed on the ceiling in front of the compressor, and an approximately 1.5 inch in diameter mound of ice was stuck to the floor where staff would walk. On 6/16/22 at 11:30 AM, observation of the walk in freezer again revealed ice build up on the ceiling in front of the compressor, similar to the observation on 6/6/22. The food service director (FSD #25) indicated that she was aware of the surveyor's observation on 6/6/22. She reported she had not yet received a final…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, surveyor observation and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to assist residents in the dining room at mealtime, to provide restorative services to residents and failed to provide geriatric nursing assistant with yearly evaluations. The findings include: 1) On 10/15/18 at 12:00 PM, during an interview, Resident # 54 stated that residents from the Canal Side Terrace B unit werenot allowed to dine in the Fireside dining room at lunch or dinner when there were not enough nursing staff working on the unit. The resident stated that, when there are 4 GNA's working, the residents can dine in Fireside dining room, and when there are only 3 GNAs, the residents must stay on the floor. Resident #54 stated that 2 GNA's are required to be present with the residents during any meal at the Fireside dining room and 2 GNA's are required to be on the unit. Resident #54 stated that the residents only get to go to the Fireside dining room about once every 3 weeks. Resident #54 stated that, in the Fireside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews and review with the GNAs at least every 12 months, for 6 out of 6 personnel files reviewed. The findings include: 1) A review was conducted of Staff #17, #21, #22, #12, #23 and #24's personnel files on 10/19/18. There were no yearly evaluations for 2018 found in the files. he Director of Nursing (DON) stated they were done and in her office. The DON brought the surveyor evaluation forms that were dated June 2018 evaluation at the top of the form. The evaluation form had a rating scale of 1 to 5 with an average overall rating. There was management feedback written on the evaluation form, however, there was no employee feedback. The form was signed by the DON, however, there was no date signed. The words declined meeting were written where the employee signatures were located. This was for all 6 GNA evaluations reviewed. An interview was conducted with the DON on 10/19/18 at 1:30 PM. The DON stated that the staff declined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview of facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a full-time qualified dietetic service supervisor was responsible for oversight of food preparation and daily kitchen operation. The findings include: An initial tour of the facility's kitchen, on 10/12/18 at 11:10 AM, revealed that the full time Director of Dietary service (Staff #26) was not clinically qualified, as per Federal and state regulations. The Director of Culinary services indicated that he/she had not completed all the course work required prior to taking the certification exam to become a Certified Dietary Manager. The Director of Culinary Services revealed that his/her position has been effective since October 9, 2017. Ongoing conversations with the Director of Culinary Services during the survey revealed that the facility had a part-time dietitian. The current registered dietitian was providing coverage to the the facility 12 hours a week. Review of the requested consultant dietitian's reports for the past 12 months did not reveal any consultation services to the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, surveyor observations and review of the medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have an effective quality assessment and assurance program. This was evident during the survey process and review of the Quality Assurance Program. The findings include: Review of the facility's prior surveys and plans of correction revealed that the facility failed to implement effective corrective measures to correct deficient practices related to notification, developing, implementing and revising care plans, nurse aide performance reviews, dignity and medication storage resulting in recurrence of the same deficient practice. These findings were discussed with Staff #1 on 10/19/18 at 3:33 PM.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner as evidenced by 1) failing to serve all residents at the same table at the same time during dining observations, and 2) failing to cover a urinary drainage bag. The observations were noted during 2 of 2 lunch time dining in the Canal Heights dining room. The findings include. 1) A lunch time dining observation was made on 10/17/18 at 12:35 PM in the Canal Side Heights dining room. Residents #40 and #15 were sitting next to each other at a table in the dining room. At 12:41 PM, resident #40 was served her/his meal tray. Resident #40 indicated/stated that she/he would like to eat at the same time as her/his table mate. Staff were observed serving other tables. Resident #15 was served her/his tray at 12:49 PM. At another table of 8 residents, 5 residents were observed to be eating by 12:45 PM, with three residents waiting. One (resident #33) of the three residents was served her/his lunch tray at 12:56 PM. The next resident #29 was served her/his lunch tray at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 7 (#97, #63, #103, #102, #72, #78, #16) of 38 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Resident#97's medical record was reviewed on 10/16/18 at 2:38 PM. The resident had been hospitalized from [DATE] - 9/6/18 and returned with a Cholecystostomy tube (a temporary tube inserted through the abdominal wall to drain the gall bladder) in his/her abdomen. No plan of care was developed to direct the resident's care and treatment related to the drainage tube. The resident had plan of care for Chronic Pain with the goal: The resident will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that facility staff failed to revise resident plans of care to reflect residents' current status. This was evident but not limited to 7 (#60, #34, #41, #43, #100, #16, #73) of 38 residents residents reviewed during the investigative phase of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed a care plan The resident uses antidepressant medication Remeron r/t (related to) depression. The goal was The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to antidepressant therapy through the review date. The care plan was initiated on 6/26/18. Documentation for this plan of care revealed that the goal was revised on 9/25/18 as the target date for the goal was changed to 12/20/18. Interview of the MDS assessment coordinator (staff #6) revealed that she had simply changed the goal date. Staff #6 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident family and staff interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and follow-up to ensure that residents received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain, and/or improve ambulatory status. This was evident but not limited for 2 (#9, #30) of 2 residents reviewed for restorative. The findings include: 1) Interview of resident #9's daughter, on 10/12/18 at 3 PM, revealed a concern that resident #9 was to be walked daily. Resident #9's daughter indicated that there was not enough staff to assure her loved one was routinely walked. Review of resident #9's care plans revealed care planning for limited physical mobility r/t weakness, history of left distal femur fracture, pain related to chronic left leg cellulitis, impaired vision and hearing. The goal for this plan of care was The resident will maintain current level of mobility (able to walk with a walker and one assist) through next review. This plan of care was initiated on 6/23/16. One intervention was written as Ambulation the resident requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Review of the medical record and interview with the resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. This was evident for 1 (#97) of 11 residents reviewed for Nutrition. The findings include: During an interview, on 10/16/18 at 9:20 AM, Resident #97 indicated that he/she had lost about 4 pounds since his/her last weight and added that he/she gets Redi care supplements with meals. Review of the residents record, on 10/17/18 at 10:28 AM, revealed a physician's order for Renal diet, regular texture with thin liquid consistency. There was no physicians order for nutritional supplements. The residents weight record revealed that he/she weighed 122.2 lbs. (pounds) on 8/3/18. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] - 9/6/18 and upon return from the hospital, his/her weight on 9/8/18 was 111 lbs. reflecting a 9.17% (11.2 lb.) weight loss in 1 month. A 5% loss in 1 month or 10% loss in 6 months is considered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure that a resident that was placed on oxygen had a physician's order for oxygen with the amount of oxygen to be administered, 2) failed to develop a respiratory, resident centered care plan for a resident with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who was placed on oxygen, 3) failed to label oxygen tubing when initiated and 4) failed to ensure that oxygen was administered at the rate ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 (#103) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge and 1 (#78) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #103 on 10/17/18 revealed a nursing admission note written on 9/10/18, which stated that the resident had an oxygen saturation level of 92% on 2L (liters) of oxygen. The resident's admitting diagnosis was CHF (congestive heart failure) along with hypertension, MI (myocardial infarction - heart attack), COPD and renal failure, requiring dialysis 3 times per week. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical records, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that each residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by failing to hold medications when the residents' vital signs were below the physician prescribed parameters. This was evident for 1 (#100) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #100's medical record was reviewed on 10/19/18 at 10:17 AM. The residents prescribed medications included but were not limited to: Lisinopril 10 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for hypertension. Hold for SBP (systolic (upper) blood pressure) < (less than) 130, DBP (diastolic (lower) blood pressure) <55. Isosorbide Mononitrate 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for chronic angina pectoris (chest pain). Hold if apical pulse (pulse obtained by listening to the heart with a stethoscope) <60, Hold for SBP <130. Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for hypertension. Hold if SBP less than 130, DBP <55, AP <60. Lasix (a fluid pill) 20 mg by mouth one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of facility narcotic logs, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that narcotic counts were performed with dual signatures, that opened refrigeratable medication was labeled with its open date and that medication carts were not left unlocked and unattended. This was evident on 1 (Terrace [NAME] Wing) of 4 hallways observed. The findings include: 1) A review of the 1st floor med cart in the Terrace west wing nursing unit was performed on 10/18/18 at 9:07 AM. During the review, it was found that there was only one signature for the 10/8/2018 7am reconciliation and for the 10/19/18 3pm reconciliation. Change-of-shift reconciliation involves the oncoming and off-going charge nurses simultaneously accounting for all narcotic blister packs on their unit. The nurses conduct the review simultaneously to maintain accountability and then sign in a controlled substance log to represent their participation. Entries with only one signature suggest that the review did not take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of residents' medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records. This was true for 5 (#114, #103, #97, #216, #77) of 45 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #114's medical record did not reflect the resident's weight loss. Resident #114's medical record was reviewed on 10/17/18 at 11:19 AM. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admission weight of 181.0 lbs. The Resident's most recent weight was 164.8 lbs and it was taken on 10/17/2018. This was a loss of 8.95% over 2 months. Intervening weights also demonstrated a downward trend. There were 7 weights taken since 10/1/2018 and all of them had an associated weight warning that triggered as part of the electronic medical record system. Progress notes were searched by type and there were no weight change notes. There were also no nutrition/dietary notes. A nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) Resident #49 was observed sitting in his/her wheelchair in the Canal Side Height's dining room during the lunch-time meal on 10/18/18 at 12:50 PM. The resident had a urinary catheter (a bag connected to a tube which drains urine from the bladder.). The catheter bag was lying on the floor underneath the wheel-chair. Additionally, the content of the drainage bag was not covered to maintain the resident's dignity. The director of nursing was notified of the findings on 10/19/18. Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease by failing to: 1) properly label and store resident care items, 2) ensure that a resident's urinary catheter bag was properly kept off the floor and 3) ensure that nursing staff maintain proper hand hygiene practices during medication administration. The findings include: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 10/15/18 at 11:13 AM. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with the resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Physician and Dietician when a resident had a significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 (#97) of 11 residents reviewed for Nutrition. The findings include: During an interview, on 10/16/18 at 9:20 AM, Resident #97 indicated that he/she had lost a few pounds since his/her last weight. A review of the resident's medical record on 10/17/18 revealed that Resident #97's weight was recorded on his/her weight record as 122.2 lbs. (pounds) on 8/3/18. He/She was hospitalized [DATE], returned to the facility on 9/6/18 with a readmission weight on 9/8/18 of 111 lbs. this reflected a 11.2 lb., or 9.17% weight decrease from 1 month prior. Further review of the record failed to reveal that the Physician or Dietician had been notified when Resident #97 was assessed to have had the significant weight loss. On 10/18/18 at 8:26 AM, Staff #1 (the Director of Nursing) was made aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from skilled therapy and nursing services and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide 1 (#268) of 3 Medicare beneficiaries reviewed with a written notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage. The findings include: The SNFABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) provides information to residents/beneficiaries that services may no longer be covered by Medicare and addresses the resident's liability for payment should they wish to continue receiving the skilled services. The NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-coverage) informs the beneficiary of his or her right to file appeal of the decision and right to an expedited review of Medicare non-coverage of services. On 10/19/18 at 2:00 PM, a review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review worksheet completed by the facility indicated that Resident #268 was discharged from skilled services on 5/2/18 with benefit days remaining. The worksheet indicated that a SNFABN form and NOMNC form had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that facility staff 1) failed to protect a resident's medical record from public view and 2) failed to take steps to provide a resident privacy during an interview. This was evident for 1 of 3 medication carts observed during the survey and for 1 (#78) of 8 residents in Canal Side Terrace-B observed for the initial pool process of the survey. The findings include: Observation was made, on 10/19/18 at 1:59 PM, of an unattended medication cart which was sitting outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a laptop computer sitting on top of the medication cart that was open. The screen displayed Resident #366's medication administration record (MAR) which displayed what medications Resident #366 was prescribed. Also sitting on the side of the medication cart was an opened Controlled Substance Tracking Form which displayed the names of 6 residents. Staff #18 walked up to the medication cart at 2:01 PM and completed a task. The surveyor walked away from the medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that he facility failed to orient, prepare and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (#16, #78) of 10 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 10/12/18 at 2:30 PM, a review of Resident #16's medical record revealed documentation that, on 5/14/18, the Resident #16 was transferred to the emergency room for an acute change in condition related to hematuria (blood in urine) and vomiting blood. Review of Resident #16's medical record did not reveal any documentation that the resident had received an explanation as to why he/she was going to the emergency room and the potential response of the resident's understanding. 2) On 10/15/18 at 3:20 PM, a review of Resident #78's medical record documented that on 9/29/18, Resident #78 was transferred to the hospital emergency room for evaluation of shortness of breath and an increased heart rate. Review of the resident's medical record did not reveal any documentation that the resident had received an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#72) of 4 residents reviewed for dental. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 10/15/18 at 11:47 AM, an observation of Resident #72 revealed that the resident was edentulous (did not have any natural teeth). On 10/18/18, review of Resident #72's medical record revealed that on 9/8/18 in a Nursing Admission/readmission Assessment, the nurse documented the resident did not have his/her own teeth. Review of Resident #72's admission assessment MDS with an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a discharge summary written and available to go with a resident to another facility upon discharge. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record on 10/17/18 documented that, on 10/5/18, resident discharged today to another facility. {name} arrived at 3:00 PM to take resident and belongings to new facility. The noted ended, d/c (discharge) packet sent with EMTs. Further review of the medical record revealed the physician's discharge summary that was in the medical record was dated 10/14/18 which was 9 days after Resident #43's discharge. Discussed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/18/18 at 10:50 AM. The DON stated, the discharge summary should have gone with the resident.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident for 1 (#8) of 1 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: On 10/15/18 through 10/19/18 of the survey, daily, intermittent observations of Resident #8 were made at various times of the day. Resident #8 was never observed in an activity or having a 1:1 (one on one) activity with facility staff. On each observation, Resident #8 was observed in the resident's room, in bed or in a wheel chair located in the hall outside of the resident's room. On 10/19/18, review of Resident #8's medical record revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and dependent on the facility staff for activities of daily living. On 10/19/18 at 11:02, during an interview, when asked if Resident #8 participated in activities, Staff #11 (Life Enrichment Assistant Director), stated that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident who received dialysis services 1) had fluids monitored, 2) had the fistula site monitored and 3) had a resident centered care plan for dialysis. This was evident for 1 (#103) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #103 on 10/17/18 revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A social service note, written on 9/11/18 at 10:01 AM, stated, goes to dialysis 3x a week, family transports. The 9/17/18 physician's progress note documented that the resident had end stage renal disease (ESRD), on HD (hemodialysis) and had multiple comorbidities. The resident was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of October 2018 physician's orders for Resident #103 revealed that the resident was monitored for intake and output every shift prior to being sent to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Review of the medical record and interview with the resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist supervised the immediate care and needs for a resident with significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 (#97) of 11 residents reviewed for Nutrition. The findings include: During an interview, on 10/16/18 at 9:20 AM, Resident #97 indicated that he/she had lost about 4 pounds since his/her last weight and added that he/she received Redi care supplements with meals. Review of the residents record on 10/17/18 at 10:28 AM revealed a physician's order for Renal diet, regular texture with thin liquid consistency. There was no physicians order for nutritional supplements. The residents weight record revealed that he/she weighed 122.2 lbs. (pounds) on 8/3/18. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] - 9/6/18 and upon return from the hospital his/her weight on 9/8/18 was 111 lbs. reflecting a 9.17%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that facility failed to provide the correct consistency of a diet as prescribed by a physician. This was identified for 1 (#29) of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition and during 2 of 2 meal time observations. The findings include. On 10/17/18, Observations of the lunch time meal service in the Canal Side Heights dining room revealed that resident #29 was served Salisbury steak that was chopped. The resident's tray/meal ticket indicated both chopped meats and ground meat. A speech language pathologist (Staff #25) was in the dinning room at the time working/observing another resident. Upon interview of the speech language pathologist (SLP), she confirmed that Resident #29 was to receive ground meat and Resident #29 did not receive the correct texture of meat. The SLP acknowledged working with Resident #29 and due to swallowing difficulties and subsequently, the resident's diet was changed to a ground meat consistency. Review of Resident #29's medical record later in the day revealed a change to the prescribed diet on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to post nursing staffing data on a daily basis and failed to ensure 18 months of posted nursing data were retained. This was evident for 5 of 5 nursing units.The findings include:On 7/15/25 at 8:00 AM surveyors entered the facility and observed a posted nursing staffing document at the receptionist's desk that was dated 7/10/25. The receptionist was questioned about the posting date and said she would provide an updated posting. Within the hour an updated nursing staff posting document was provided that indicated it was for 7/15/25.On 7/24/2025 at 12:14 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) to review that the daily nursing staff posting on 7/15/25 displayed data for 7/10/25. She explained that the Staff Scheduler (Staff #) posted that information and that she did not work weekends. However, she concurred that 7/15/25 was a Tuesday and that the posting for that day was not present. When the DON was asked for copies of nursing staff posted data for the previous six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-06-24 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records and other pertinent documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the written transfer notice included all the required information including the right to appeal. This was found to be evident for 3 (#78, #88, and #102) out of the 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #88's electronic and paper medical record on 6/09/22 at 10:23 AM revealed that the resident had a change in condition on 5/01/22. The resident's medical record revealed documentation that the resident was sent to a hospital for evaluation and treatment, and the Responsible Party (RP) was called. However, there was no written documentation related to the resident transfer or discharge notice. 2) A review of Resident #78's electronic and paper medical records on 6/16/22 at 1:12 PM revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 4/20/22 for evaluation of altered mental status. A nurse's note, dated 4/22/22, showed that the resident's RP was notified regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to notify the resident and/or resident's Representative Party (RPs) in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility (Resident #88, 78 and 102) and 2) and failed to ensure that the policy included the required information. This was evident for 4 (Resident #7, #78, #88, and #102) of 4 residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility. The findings include: 1a) A review of Resident #88's electronic and paper medical record on 6/09/22 at 10:23 AM revealed that the resident had a change in condition on 5/01/22. The physician was notified and ordered the resident to be transferred to the hospital for evaluation related to decreasing O2 saturation and altered mental status. Further review of Resident #88's medical record documentation revealed that the responsible party was called, however, there was no written documentation that the responsible party and/or resident was given a copy of the bed hold policy. An interview was conducted with the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-10-19 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to have the results of a recent complaint survey posted in the survey binders that were accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. This was evident in four of four survey binders. The findings include: On 10/18/18, review of a survey binder, located on the Westview Heights wing near the main entrance to the nursing home, revealed that a complaint survey conducted on 5/4/18 was not available to be viewed. Review of the survey binder book found in a hallway next to the elevator near the nursing home administrator's office revealed that the complaint survey ending on 5/4/18 was not in the survey binder. A third survey binder on Canal [NAME] revealed that the 5/4/18 survey was not available. On 10/19/18 at 12:18 PM, the associate nursing home administer (staff#2) was informed of the missing survey results. The associate administrator revealed that there was a fourth survey binder on the upper most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-10-19 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident, along with the reason for the transfer, and failed to notify the Ombudsman. This was evident for 8 (#11, #103, #97, #59, #16, #78, #92, #102) of 10 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #11's medical record on 10/17/18 revealed documentation, dated 10/13/18, which stated labs reviewed by on call provider with order to send to {name of acute care facility} for evaluation secondary to abnormal labs with nausea/vomiting. The note continued 911 here with 2 attendants to transport resident to {name} ER, resident was placed on stretcher safely by 911 attendants. There was no written documentation that the resident or responsible party were notified in writing of the transfer. 2) Review of Resident #103's medical record, on 10/17/18, revealed nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-10-19 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed-hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#11, #103) of 10 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #11's medical record on 10/17/18 revealed documentation, dated 10/13/18, which stated labs reviewed by on call provider with order to send to {name of acute care facility} for evaluation secondary to abnormal labs with nausea/vomiting. The note continued 911 here with 2 attendants to transport resident to {name} ER, resident was placed on stretcher safely by 911 attendants. There was no written documentation that the resident or resident representative were notified in writing of the bed-hold policy. 2) Review of Resident #103's medical record on 10/17/18 revealed nursing documentation, dated 10/7/18, which revealed that Resident #103 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-10-19 · tag F0655 — widespread
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop baseline care plans that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care and failed to provide residents/representatives with a copy of their baseline care plan and medication list. This was evident for 7 (#92, #97, #59, #63, #103, #78) of 38 residents reviewed during the investigative phase of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) The facility failed to give Resident #92 a copy of the resident's baseline care plan related to his/her entry to the facility at the beginning of September, 2018. During review of Resident #92's medical record on 10/15/2018 at 1:34 PM, it was found that the resident was hospitalized at the end of August 2018 and returned at the beginning of September. There was no evidence in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-10-19 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) Based on daily observations of the daily shift posting of staff on the Canal Side Heights (A-wing), the posted staffing was not In a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors nor in a clear readable format which could be read by a wheel chair bound resident. The daily shift posting of staff was located on a clip board in the nursing station area of the unit. The clip board with the required staffing information was high up on the wall making it difficult to read from the height of a wheel chair bound resident. Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff, it was determined that he facility failed to ensure the required nurse staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident on 3 of 6 resident care areas observed during the survey. The findings include: On 10/16/18 at 2:16 PM, the surveyor observed the Canal Side Skylight unit. The unit had 8 bedrooms, housing 13 residents. It was the only unit located on an upper level and was accessible by an elevator or stairs. The surveyor was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Bowling Green Health & Rehabilitation CenterBowling Green, VA

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILLIAMSPORT OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2024
ISVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF31%since 11/01/2024
JKVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF31%since 11/01/2024
MLVA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF31%since 11/01/2024
AA 2023 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
AAMD HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
MAMD HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
VNB NEW YORK LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
KOHN, AVROHOMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2024
TAYLOR, KATRINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BURTON, NOAHIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/26/2019
GOTTESMAN, DANIELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
RUBIN, ELIEZERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
WEISS, HILLELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2024
154 N ARTIZAN STREET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2025
41 FESSLER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
41 MICHELLE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
ACS PRO GLOBAL SOLUTIONSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
AKY 148 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
CYOP CYBER SECURITY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
DIGACORE CONSULTINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HSHC 2024 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
IBS FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
LIVE WELL PLUS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
MEDICAL FACILITIES OF AMERICA ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
MFA CLINICAL CONSULTINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
MLN FAMILY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
MOZART HOLDINGS, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
RYTES COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
TURNING POINT CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
WILLIAMSPORT PROPERTY HOLDINGS II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BEARD, LACYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BECKNER, RHONDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
GASTON, ELESNARIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
GOMEZ, RENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HITE, KARIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
MCCUSKER, JEREMYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
OATES, BRYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
PIPER, KARMAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
SHUHART, TASHAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
VOOTLA, TEJASWIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
WELCH, JOSEPHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 51 rows in the source record cover these 46 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

29 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$811K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 19%Other / private 29%

This home reported $811K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$425per resident / day
operating cost
$12,914per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$360per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215198. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next