Crescent Cities Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
4409 East West Highway, Riverdale, MD 20737 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 158 certified beds · (301) 699-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-14)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.1% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 64.6% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 22.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.9% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.4% | 25.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.6% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.1% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.3% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.44 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 451 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 189 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.8%CMS range 51.6–60.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 10.6–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 88.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 5.7–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 153.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 44) reviewed for safe transfers from a total sample of 39 was safe during a transfer that required a mechanical lift. This failure caused R44 to have a right femur fracture. Upon identification of the fracture, the facility failed to report the fracture, failed to conduct a root cause analysis of the fracture, and failed to ensure staff were provided education on proper mechanical lift transfers. R44 reported to Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) 1 on an unknown date that she was afraid of the Hoyer lift because of a previous incident. GNA1 reported this information to the nurse on duty (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1). It was reported that LPN1 assessed R44 at the time; however, there was no documentation of the assessment. LPN1 failed to report the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON) or Administrator. These failures caused serious injury to R44. An Immediate Jeopardy was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served meals according to predetermined menus. This was evident for 4 (Residents #92, #34, #121 and #48) of 6 random meal trays sampled during the lunch tray line observation.The findings include: Pureed diet is a texture- modified diet consisting of smooth, moist, pudding-like food requiring no chewing. Designed for residents with swallowing difficulties. Thickened liquids are beverages or fluids with added agents (powder/gel) to increase viscosity, designed for residents with swallowing difficulties. On 2/24/2026 at 10:11 AM, Resident #1 reported frequently receiving items that do not match their meal ticket. For breakfast on 2/22/26, the resident expected orange juice, hot cereal, and milk, however received a glass of pink drink (Kool-Aid) and a bowl of oatmeal. The meal ticket for that date specified 4 oz apple juice, 2% milk, and 8 oz coffee. On 2/25/2026 at 12:02 PM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed that kitchen provided apple, orange or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the ice machines in a clean and sanitary manner. This was evident in 2 of 5 ice machines inspected during the recertification survey. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared by the facility. The findings include: On 2/24/2026 at 9:15 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the surveyor observed the ice machine was last cleaned on 9/25/25 as indicated on the Cleaning schedule document that was found hanging on the side of the ice machine. The following information was also noted:Location- Lower level kitchenetteFilter date- 2/22/25Cleaned- (mark checked)Comments- is Good The CDM confirmed that the maintenance department should clean the machines monthly. The Regional Dietary Manager also acknowledged this observation.On 2/24/2026 at 10:42 AM, the surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #5) inspected the second floor Terrapin nourishment room and found that the ice machine had no cleaning log. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) onsite. Failure to have an Infection Preventionist has the potential to decrease compliance with infection control.The findings include:An Infection Preventionist is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, and monitoring the Infection Prevention and Control Program of the facility to prevent and control infections.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 2/25/26 at 12:14 PM, they both stated that the Infection Preventionist (IP) had resigned on 1/26/26. The DON stated that the facility currently have an IP from a sister facility who assists with overseeing the IP program at the facility. The DON also stated that he is not IP certified, but he collects all the required infection prevention and control data and emails them to the sister facility IP. On 2/26/26 at 09:18 AM, during an interview with the sister facility IP (Staff # 29), who stated that she/he is never in the building, but infection prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that all residents and/or representatives received written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and the option to formulate an Advance Directive (AD). This is true for 1 (Resident #166) of 4 resident records reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification survey process. Findings Included:On 02/25/2026 at 12:22 PM, the Social Worker (SW) explained the AD process, stating ADs were to be uploaded to the electronic health record upon admission. If not available, the AD was discussed during the Discharge Planning Psychosocial Assessment. The SW noted that while the assessment form included a question about offering information for initiating an AD, the form may not have been accurately, checked, or completed.On 02/25/2026 at 12:42 PM, a review of Resident #166's Discharge Planning Psychosocial Assessment indicated no existing AD, and the section regarding education about initiating AD was left unanswered/blank.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #32) of 68 resident care plans reviewed during the recertification survey process.Findings Included:On 02/26/2026 at 2:21 PM, a review of Resident #32's Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed an order dated 01/29/2026 for cefTRIAXone Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 2 gram (Ceftriaxone Sodium), once daily for a 5-day course to treat a bacterial infection.On 02/27/2026 at 2:49 PM, a review of Resident #32's care plan revealed the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the resident's infectious disease process and antibiotic treatment needs.A further review of the resident's care plan showed the facility developed a care plan for the risk of complications related to opioid use; however, there was no documented evidence to support that the resident had orders for opioids since admission. Therefore, the Resident's care plan was not resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff used a functional communication system to communicate personal care needs for a non-English speaking resident. This was evidenced by findings for 1 (Resident #172) of 1 resident reviewed for communication and language services during the recertification/complaint survey.Findings Included:A care plan is a tool used to summarize the resident's healthcare needs, treatments, and care goals. This tool is to be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and prepared by an interdisciplinary team.On 02/24/2026 at 12:00 PM, during the initial pool phase of the annual survey process, Resident #172 (who was non-English speaking) called out to the surveyor, pointed to the perineal area.On 02/24/2026 at 12:01 PM, Staff #7 was notified of Resident #172's need for assistance. The surveyor observed Staff #7 and a housekeeper enter the room. When interviewed, Staff #7 stated that communication with Spanish-speaking residents was accomplished by utilizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an adequate smoking evaluation and safety assessment for a resident. This deficiency was evident for one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for safety in smoking during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the initial tour of the facility on 2/24/26 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor observed three packages of cigarettes and a lighter in Resident #39's drawer. The resident stated that the facility allowed residents to keep smoking materials (including cigarettes and lighters) in their possession.On 2/27/26 at 7:52 AM, a review of Resident #39's medical records revealed that smoking assessments were conducted upon admission [DATE]) and quarterly thereafter. The most recent quarterly assessment, dated 8/23/25, incorrectly coded the question Does the resident smoke? as No. Similarly, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section J, documented Resident #39's smoking status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely address and communicate significant weight changes. This deficiency was evident for two (Resident #11 and Resident #143) of six residents reviewed for nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) A review of Resident #11's medical record on 2/24/26 at 1:21 PM revealed significant and fluctuating weight changes between August 2025 and September 2025:8/05/25: 143 lbs (Wheelchair)8/12/25: 142 lbs (Wheelchair)8/15/25: 115.1 lbs (Wheelchair) - Significant Drop8/19/25: 115 lbs (Wheelchair)8/22/25: 140 lbs (Wheelchair) - Significant Increase8/26/25: 140.2 lbs (Wheelchair)8/29/25: 111.5 lbs (Wheelchair) - Significant Drop9/02/25: 115.8 lbs (Wheelchair)The resident's weight has remained at approximately 115 lbs from September 2025 to the present.A subsequent review of the resident's nutrition assessments on 2/26/26 at 9:01 AM showed entries by the Dietitian on 6/17/25 and 9/04/25. The note dated 9/04/25 identified an unplanned weight loss from 140 lbs to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services. This was evident for 3 (Residents #1, #3 and #171) of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey. The findings include: Oxygen (O2) therapy is a treatment that provides a person with extra O2 to breathe in. It is also called supplemental O2. A nasal cannula is a thin, flexible tube that delivers O2 through the nose. A humidifier in O2 therapy is a device that adds moisture to dry, concentrated O2 to prevent drying and irritation of a patient's nasal passages, throat, and lungs. These humidifiers typically consist of a bottle filled with water that attaches to an O2 concentrator. 1) On 2/24/2026 at 10:02 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #1 was observed in bed receiving O2 therapy via nasal cannula (NC), both the tubing and the humidifier bottle were unlabeled. On 2/27/2026 at 10:00 AM, a review of Resident #1's physician orders confirmed the following: Continuous Oxygen at 3-5 liters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee files and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) demonstrated competency in essential skills and techniques prior to providing resident care. This deficiency was identified in four out of four (Staff #11, #12, #13, and #14) newly hired GNA employee charts reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:The American Nurses Association defines nursing competence as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment.On 2/26/26 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor requested training records for four randomly selected GNAs. A review of these records revealed the following:-Staff #11 (Hired April 2025): Skills validation records were signed on 4/29/25. However, the form-which includes categories for general care, infection control, clinical skills, and specialized needs-was incomplete. Specific omissions included cleaning and disinfecting equipment, Transmission-Based Precautions, shower stretcher use, hearing aids,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and provide appropriate treatment and services to assist a resident in attaining their highest practicable mental health well-being. This deficiency was evident for one of one resident (Resident #111) reviewed for behavioral and emotional well-being during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During an initial tour on 2/24/26 at 9:28 AM, Resident #111 was observed screaming, yelling, and crying in their room. A nursing staff member stated to the surveyor, [Resident #111] has psychological issues.In an interview on 2/24/26 at 10:31 AM, a family member of Resident #111 stated the resident had no prior history of dementia or mental health issues. The family member noted, On 12/24/25, [Resident #111] was found to have a knee fracture due to age and bone fragility. Facility staff told me the screaming and crying were due to pain. Now, they have scheduled a psychological consultation. I just have to trust the facility.On 2/27/26 at 11:59 AM, a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was true for 3 (Residents #171, #3 and #116) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification survey. The findings include: Clopidogrel is a prescription antiplatelet medication used to prevent serious blood clots, reducing the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Humalog sliding scale is a personalized, doctor prescribed chart that tells how much rapid-acting insulin to inject based on the blood sugar reading before a meal. Sliding means the dose changes: higher blood sugar = more insulin; lower blood sugar = less insulin. Tizanidine is a prescription medication to relax tight, stiff, and spasming muscles. 1) On 3/02/2026 at 9:34 AM, a review of Resident #3's medical records revealed medication orders that read: Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablet 75 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% during the medication observation facility task. This was evident for 2 of 26 medication administration opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 7.69%. Findings Included:A Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube is the placement of a flexible gastric tube into the stomach. On 02/27/2026 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #31 administering medications to Resident #87. LPN #31 crushed and administered acetaminophen 500mg via a gastric feeding tube. On 02/27/2026 at approximately 11:00 AM the surveyor reviewed Resident #87's medication orders and Medication administration records which revealed an order for acetaminophen 325mg Oral 2 tablets. The surveyor reviewed the medication orders with LPN #31 and she stated that she didn't know why she thought she saw 500mg on the Resident's order. On 02/27/2026 at approximately 11:00 AM, the surveyor also observed that LPN #31 administered a multivitamin 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication was stored in a locked compartments under proper temperature controls. This was true for Resident#172's room observed during the initial tour of the facility. Findings included: On 02/24/2026 at 12:14 PM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed prescribed skin cream on Resident #172's window ledge unattended. The medication container was prescribed to Resident #172 and had instructions to refrigerate medication. On 02/24/2026 at 12:18 PM, in an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #27 was asked why the resident's medication was at bedside and she stated that they recently provided personal care to the resident.On 02/24/2026 at 12:14 PM, a review of Resident's #172's Treatment Administration Record revealed that resident had an order for Greers [NAME] Cream, apply to Perineal topically two times a day for Erythema Interigo. On 02/27/2026 at 03:55 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was informed of the surveyor's findings and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was delivered to residents at an appropriate and palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 of 1 test tray temperature observation. The findings include: On 2/24/2026 at 10:11 AM, Resident #1 complained that hot foods were usually served cold. On 2/25/2026 at 12:08 PM, the surveyor conducted a lunch tray line observation and requested the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) to include a tray on the first cart that was going to the unit. At 12:26 PM, the steel cart which contained the meal trays for the first unit with the test tray came out from the kitchen and arrived in the unit at 12:28 PM. However, there was a seven- minute delay before staff began distributing trays, and the final tray was served at 12:44 PM. Both the CDM and the [NAME] Dietary Manager (RDM) witnessed the observation. The RDM proceeded to test the food on the test tray using the facility's food thermometer and recorded the following:- fried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was prescribed for a resident. This deficiency affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for dietary services during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During an interview on 2/24/26 at 11:30 AM, Resident #57 expressed that the provided meals did not accommodate their medical conditions. The resident stated, I am waiting for a kidney transplant. Because of that, I really need a controlled diet for diabetes and end-stage renal disease. However, the facility has been serving me foods I should not have, such as spinach, bananas, and soda.On 2/25/26 at 11:55 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #57's diet order, which specified a Heart-healthy diabetic diet-regular texture, thin liquid consistency. A review of the medical record confirmed diagnoses of Diabetes and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A review of progress notes dated 1/21/26 at 9:48 PM indicated that a facility nurse documented concerns from the resident and their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions as required. This is evident for 1(Resident #87) of 7 Residents observed for medication administration during the facility task portion of the survey process. Findings Included:Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) (CDC website 2025).A Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube is the placement of a flexible gastric tube into the stomach.Personal protective equipment (PPE)is an equipment worn such as gloves, gowns, masks, respirators, and eye protection designed to create a physical barrier between healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint and a facility report incident, reviews of a closed and active medical record and all pertinent administrative records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) follow physician orders to obtain weights, and 2) provide care to a resident when a staff member called out during the day shift on 01/12/2025. This was evident for 3 (Residents #19, #1, #21) out of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of complaint MD00218857/358373 on 09/08/2025 revealed allegations that Resident #19 did not receive quality care during his/her stay. Review of Resident #19's closed medical record on 09/08/2025 revealed the Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses that included a gastrostomy tube, congestive heart failure, and protein-calorie malnutrition. On 05/02/2025, Resident #19's physician gave orders to the nursing staff to obtain a weight, 3 times a week, on Resident #19, and notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of closed and active medical records, reviews of the facility enteral feeding tube policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was evident for 5 (Residents #19, # 25, #26, #27, #28) of 30 residents reviewed for tube feeding during a complaint survey.The findings include:There are risks associated with residents using feeding tubes for nutrition. These risks include aspiration (accidentally inhaling your stomach contents), accidental dislodgement (tube moving out of place or coming out), bleeding and perforation (hole in the wall of your bowel or intestine), infection near the site, pain, and stomach leakage to name some. Appropriate treatment and services are required to prevent complications of enteral feeding.A review of the facility Enteral Feeding Tubes policy on 09/08/2025 revealed the following:Effective date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of 1) the risk and benefits of a surgical procedure and 2) to seek permission to perform the surgical procedure. This was evident for 1 (Resident #25) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of the complaint #MD00212895/358358 on 9/11/2025, revealed an allegation Resident #25's responsible party was not notified in advance of a wound care nurse practitioners plan to perform a debridement of Resident #25's sacral wound and bilateral heel wounds.Review of Resident #25's closed medical record on 09/11/2025 revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to a cerebrovascular accident with right side weakness, aphasia, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, a sacral pressure ulcer, and a feeding tube placement. Resident #25 was totally dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record and a patient fund account, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to disperse the remaining account funds to a discharged resident (Resident #23) within 30 days. This is evident for 1 of 30 residents reviewed during compliant survey. The findings include:Review of complaint MD00213913/358365 on 09/10/2025 revealed and allegation Resident #23 had not received the remaining disbursement of funds after being discharged from the facility. Resident #23 alleges that there is $2,513.14 the facility is still holding from in his/her patient fund account. A review of Resident #23's closed medical record on 09/10/2025 revealed that Resident #23 was discharged from the facility on 03/31/2025. A review of Resident #23's financial summary on 09/10/2025 at 3:03 PM revealed a sum of $1,920.96 is currently owed to Resident #23 from the facility.In an Interview with the facility Administrator and Business Office Manager (BOM) on 09/10/2025 at 3:03 PM, the facility BOM confirmed that Resident #23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record, and all pertinent administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately notify a resident's physician and responsible party regarding a change in condition on 07/06/25 at 3 AM. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:The facility staff failed to immediately notify Resident #15's physician and representative when Resident #15 had an unwitnessed fall with injury on 07/06/25 at 3 AM.Review of complaint 2580338 on 08/21/25 revealed an allegation Resident #15 had been abused by the facility staff on 07/06/2025.Review of Resident #15's closed medical record on 08/21/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include pneumonia, respiratory failure and vascular dementia. Dementia is a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life. Resident #15 also only spoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon complaint, reviews of a closed medical record and all other pertinent administrative documents, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that incidents of injuries of unknown source were reported to the State Agency (OHCQ) in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 15, #25) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of injuries of unknown origin are to be reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality in a timely manner.1) The State Survey Agency (SA) received a complaint on 08/04/2025 (Intake 2580338) with complainant allegations indicating that Resident #15's had been abused by the facility staff. Resident #15's daughter came into the facility to check in on her relative, Resident #15, the morning of 07/06/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a resident's closed medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care in accordance with the resident's plan of care. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #25) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) is a term used collectively to describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, toileting, bathing, and mobility.The State Survey Agency (SA) received an additional complaint on 01/05/2025 (Intake MD00212895/358358) with complaints indicating that Resident #25's had not received incontinence care timely. A review of Resident #25's closed medical record on 09/11/2025 revealed Resident #25 was admitted from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebrovascular accident with right side weakness, percutaneous gastrostomy tube (feeding tube), and a tracheostomy. Resident #25 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by crushing a medication that should not be crushed. This was evident for 2 (Residents #19, #7) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:1) Review of complaint MD00218857/358373 on 09/08/2025 revealed allegations that Resident #19 did not receive quality care during his/her stay.Review of Resident #19's closed medical record on 09/08/2025 revealed the Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses that included a gastrostomy tube, congestive heart failure, and protein-calorie malnutrition. On 05/02/2025, Resident #19's physician gave orders to the nursing staff to obtain a weight, 3 times a week, on Resident #19, and notify the physician if there is a 2-pound increase in weight. On 09/08/2025 at 12:43 PM a review of Resident #19's medical record was conducted.Review of Resident #19's May 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for ?????? (Residents #15) of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include.A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate.1) The State Survey Agency (SA) received a complaint on [DATE] (Intake 2580338) with allegations indicating Resident #15 had been abused by the facility staff. A review of Resident #15's closed medical record on [DATE] at 1 PM revealed that Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15's closed record was reviewed on [DATE] which revealed a Maryland Medical Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 39 sampled residents (Resident (R) 23) was treated with dignity and respect during meals. Specifically, staff stood over the R23 while assisting the resident with eating, staff did not offer R23 an alternate for lunch when the resident continued to spit out his/her food, and staff failed to remove a large tube of A&D Medicated Ointment (used during incontinent care to treat rashes and protect the skin) off of R23's bedside table prior to placing his/her meal tray on the table. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Rights, dated 01/23/20, revealed, The Health and Rehabilitation Center promotes the education and exercising of the legal rights of all patients. Review of the R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/05/24 and located under the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was readmitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of Resident Council Minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable for five of five residents (Resident (R) 29, R35, R48, R55, and R133) reviewed for food palatability out of 39 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to cause unmet nutritional needs for 145 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Meal Delivery,' dated 01/29/24, revealed, . Patients will be served meals in a courteous and dignified manner. The policy recorded that the nursing department will deliver meals to patients with the requirements that include delivering meals within 30 minutes of their delivery to the unit. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Meal Times [sic] and Frequency revealed that meals will be served in a timely manner to maintain food quality and safe and palatable food temperatures. 1. Review of Resident Council meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a complaint, medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and review admission agreement with the appropriate resident or representative (RP). This was evident for 2 of 39 (#813 and #830) residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review on 11/6/24 at 10:45 AM of the complaint #MD00205155 revealed concerns related to the reviewing and signing of the admission contract. Resident (R) # 813 was admitted to the facility in early February 2024 and assessed on the admission minimum data set (standardized clinical assessment that evaluates a resident's health needs and functional capabilities) as having a brief interview of mental status (BIMS-mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents) of '00' which would indicate severe cognitive impairment. On R #813's admission, there was an identified representative that met with the facility social worker and business office according to the progress notes. A review of the resident's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the correct person was identified to make medical treatment decisions on the Maryland Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 (#818) MOLST forms, reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident (R) # 818 on [DATE] at 12:38 PM revealed diagnosis including diabetes mellitus and frequent falls. Upon admission to the facility in October of 2022, R# 818 arrived with a completed MOLST stating that s/he was a full code, to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), according to section 1 CPR status based on the patient's request dated [DATE]. However, on [DATE] a new MOLST form was completed with section 1 filled out to say that R#818 was now to be a 'do not resuscitate/do not intubate.' This decision was now based on the residents' surrogate decision maker. On the back of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported within two hours and investigative results were reported within five working days to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of nine residents (Resident (R) 18) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 39, and for 1 (Resident #807) of 16 facility reports reviewed for abuse during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Crime, dated 10/17/23, indicated, . Immediately upon notification or any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, the Administrator will immediately report to the State Agency (SA), but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (Resident (R) 18, #12) out of 39 reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. There was no evidence that the facility interviewed other current residents regarding the allegation. This failure had the potential to place all residents at risk of continued abuse. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Crime, dated 10/17/23, indicated, . The Administrator must thoroughly investigate . The written follow-up investigative reporting document that is submitted must contain sufficient detail to demonstrate that a thorough investigation was conducted . Review of R18's admission Record, found under the Profile in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right femur fracture,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to permit a resident to stay in their facility. This was evident for 1 (#810) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge complaints during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 11/8/24 at 10:55 AM a medical record review was conducted for Resident #810. On 8/11/24 the physician documented the resident was admitted for subacute rehabilitation services. According to a Discharge Planning Psychological Assessment completed on 8/12/24, the resident wanted to be discharged home. A capacity form was completed by the attending physician on 8/13/24 which noted the resident had capacity to make decision. A care plan note dated 8/19/24 read the resident was adamant to move back to his/her home. On 9/6/24 a progress note was entered that the resident was issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (a document that informs the resident of the date that their medication coverage will end and list their options to appeal the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to issue a 30-day transfer notice to a resident prior to transferring them to another facility. This was evident for 1 (#810) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A record review for Resident #810 on 11/14/24 at 9:04 AM revealed a progress note dated 9/6/24 that noted the resident had been issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). A progress note dated 9/10/24, noted the resident had been discharged to another facility. However, further review failed to reveal any documentation that the resident had initiated the transfer, the resident agreed with the transfer, or a 30-day discharge/transfer notice. On 11/13/2024 at 11:19 AM a review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) issued to Resident #810 revealed it was signed by the resident on 9/6/24 and stated the resident's benefits ended on 9/11/24. An interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) on 11/12/24 at 12:17 PM confirmed it was not a resident - initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide discharge planning for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#829) of 2 residents reviewed for discharges during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 11/13/24 at 1:11 PM a review of complaint #MD00196716 revealed that there were concerns regarding the facility's failure to provide a discharge date for Resident (R) #829. A medical record review for R #829 on 11/13/24 at 1:22 PM revealed a discharge planning progress note written by the Discharge Planner on 8/24/23 that noted the resident the plan was for the resident to go back home upon discharge. A progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 8/25/23 revealed the resident had been admitted to the facility for aftercare of a right femoral fracture, high blood pressure, and cardiomyopathy. The resident was ordered occupational and physical therapy. A care plan note dated 8/29/23 noted that the discharge plans were the same. Further review revealed that facility failed to initiate a discharge care plan. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to 1) obtain a dental consult, 2) monitor resident behaviors as ordered by the physician, and 3) obtain a resident's stool sample and send the stool sample for laboratory analysis (#806). This was evident for 2 (#807 and #806) of 16 reports reviewed for abuse during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Resident (R) #807's medical record was reviewed on 11/13/24 at 10:11 AM. A Change in Condition Evaluation dated 3/26/24 18:52 revealed the nurse observed the resident's right lower jaw was swollen. Not painful when touched. The resident did not complain of pain and was in no acute distress. The Physician was notified and provided an order to schedule the resident for a dental appointment. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal a dental consult report. The DON was asked to provide the surveyor with any information regarding the dental consult or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring of a resident's pain (R#12) resulting in the resident receiving delayed treatment for a fractured right ankle. This was evident for 1 of 39 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A Medication Administration Record (MAR) - a document that records when and how much medication a resident is administered. For as-needed pain medication, it also documents what pain score a resident is reporting and whether the pain medication was effective at easing that pain. Failure to maintain an accurate MARs prevents members of the healthcare team from knowing when and why medication has been given. This can result in medication mistakes, overdose, or denying practitioners information on how much medication a resident receives. On 11/4/24 at 11:00am, the surveyor reviewed a facility investigation dated 3/18/23 regarding the facility's inability to determine the cause of R#12's fractured right ankle. A review of R#12's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. During observations of medication pass, there were three errors observed out of 31 opportunities, resulting in a 9.68% error rate. This had the potential to place two residents (Resident (R) 13 and R114) at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their medication therapy. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration Procedures for All Medications, revised 08/2020, indicated, . 5 Rights (at a minimum): At a minimum, review the five rights at each of the following steps of medication administration. 1. Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer: a. Check the Medication Administration Record (MAR) . for the order. c. If unfamiliar with the medication, consult a drug reference, manufacturer package insert, or pharmacist for more information . 2. Prior to removing the medication from the container: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer alternate meals for one of 39 (Resident (R) 23) sampled residents observed during meal time. R23, a severely cognitively impaired resident, showed signs she did not like the meal served but staff did not offer a substitute without prompting. This had the potential to have a negative impact on R23's nutritional status. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Meal Delivery, dated 01/29/24, revealed, . Nursing staff will offer alternatives to any patient who does not eat at least 25% of their meal or who refuses food. Nursing will notify the Dining Services Department of a patient's desire for an alternate and deliver the alternate to the patient . Review of the R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/05/24, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included depression and a cerebrovascular accident (CVA).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to follow up with outside resources for the care of residents (Resident #820). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey for ordered appointments or services not rendered inside the facility. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident (R) #820 on 11/13/24 at 9:29 AM revealed admitting diagnosis including multiple pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries of the left foot. R #820 was assessed by the facility wound physician on 10/6/22. This was a comprehensive skin and wound evaluation. According to the plan and consults the wound care team recommended a vascular consult with doppler exam for further evaluation of vascular assessment. It was noted that the staff and facility were aware and explained in detail. On 11/13/24, this was reviewed with the facility DON and the assessments and studies were requested as they could not be found in the resident's medical record. Follow up on 11/13/24 at 3:03 PM the facility Consultant Nurse reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #513) out of 33 resident records reviewed during the revisit survey. The finding include: On 1/8/2025 at 12:30PM, a review of Resident #513's treatment administration record (TAR) revealed a check sign entered on 1/3/2025 dayshift, which indicated that the stool specimen collection task had been completed and signed off by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13. On 1/9/2025 at 9:20AM, an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)#5 revealed that there were no results for Resident #513's stool specimen in the electronic medical record because the specimen was never collected. The Surveyor was informed that LPN #13 signed off that the stool specimen was collected in the resident's TAR, but never actually completed the task because the resident never had a bowel movement. An interview with the Regional Clinical Nurse (RCN) # 9 on 1/9/2025 at 1:15PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing wound care for one of one resident (Resident (R) 204) reviewed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) out of a total sample of 39. This failure increased the risk of spreading multi-drug-resistant organisms throughout the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that one of six residents (R82) observed during medication administration was given medication in a manner to prevent possible cross-contamination. This failure had the potential to place R82 at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 03/26/24, indicated, . Employees providing high-contact patient care activities will follow EBP for patients who meet the criteria . EBP require the use of gown and gloves by staff during high-contact patient care activities as defined below .Wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations during an environmental tour and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident for 6 of 37 residents observed during the survey process (Residents #20, #25, #36, #53, #59, and #66). The findings include: 1. On 7/8/19 at 10:57 AM an observation of Resident #59's room (219B) revealed tattered blinds on the windowsill. 2. On 7/8/19 at 10:51 AM an observation in Resident #36's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]A) revealed a large amount of soft stool on the bottom of the bathroom toilet. The sides of the toilet were spattered with stool. This bathroom was shared between the residents residing in two separate rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) and utilized by a total of four residents (Resident's #20, #36, #53, and #66). Further observations of the room revealed a red sharps container hanging on the interior wall. At the time of the observations the sharps container was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of residents' medical records and an interview with a resident, it was determined that the facility failed to 1. develop a care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #45), 2. develop a care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings (Resident #108), and 3. develop a care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for sensory deficits (Resident #10). The findings include: 1. Resident #45's medical record was reviewed on 7/9/19 at 11:28 AM. During the review, it was found that the resident had medical conditions that rendered him/her unable to control his/her bladder or to know when he/she has soiled himself/herself. On 7/9/19 at 12:00 PM observation of care for Resident #45 revealed the resident was noted to have an external urinary catheter device. The device maintained close contact with the resident's skin but did not enter the urinary canal. Resident #45's care plan was reviewed on 7/11/19. The care plan did not specifically address the care that the Resident #45 requires regarding the frequency of catheter changes, how to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide the appropriate level of assistance and services for 3 of 30 residents that require assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) (Residents #65, 20, and #17). The findings include: 1a. On 7/8/19 at 11:18 AM during an interview with Resident #65, the resident stated he/she had not had a shower in a long time. When asked if he/she wanted showers he/she replied, yes. When asked how often he/she would like to have a shower the resident stated, twice a week. On 7/9/19 at 1:30 PM the medical record for Resident #65 was reviewed. It was noted that on 5/10/19, the resident was given a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The BIMS score is an evaluation, based on an interview, which assesses the resident's attention, level of orientation and ability to recall information. On 7/16/19 at 10:07 AM Unit Manager (UM) #6 was interviewed. UM #6 reported that Resident #65 received showers. UM #6 was unable to provide documentation to show when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence that all nursing staff had received competency evaluations. This was evident for 3 of 4 employee selected for review during the survey (Staff #13, #14, and #15) and all nursing staff hired prior to 6/15/19. The findings include: The term 'nursing competencies' refers to routine evaluations of nursing staffs' capabilities and skills. On 7/15/19 at around 2:30 PM, a list of all nursing staff including their titles and dates of hire was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 7/16/19 at approximately 9:30 AM, the list of nursing staff was provided, but did not include dates of hire. The DON stated the facility had the dates of hire but was unable to print out a list of the employees with the dates of hire on it. The DON was told by the surveyors that they needed to see some records of employees that had worked in the facility for greater than one year. On 7/16/19 at 1:12 PM, the Human Resources (HR) Director and Administrator presented to the surveyors to discuss the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews with the facility's staff, a review of the facility's infection control polices and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1. follow acceptable infection control practices, 2. maintain the laundry area in a manner to ensure clean [NAME] and prevent or control the spread of infection, and 2) ensure that food service was provided to residents in a sanitary manner as evidenced by mobile food carts not having proper food protection in the form of sneeze guards on three of the sides. This was evident for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for isolation precautions (#104, #109) and for 3 of 3 mobile food carts observed in the facility's kitchen. Clostridium difficile (C.diff) is a bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis (an inflammation of the colon). It is estimated to cause almost half a million illnesses in the United States each year. About 1 in 5 patients who get C. diff. diff will get it again. Findings include: 1a. On 7/9/19 Resident #104's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the facility and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's nursing staff failed to ensure confidentiality of residents' medical record was maintained on the third floor nursing unit. This was evident on 2 out of 10 medication carts, one resident (Resident #52) with an order for blood pressure medication, and all residents on the unit with a prescription for a narcotic medication. The findings include: On 7/15/19 at 10:14 AM, a tour of the the third floor (Memory Care) unit was conducted. Observation of the unit revealed one unattended nursing medication cart that was parked in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Two empty medication pill packs were observed on top of the unattended medication cart. One pill pack contained zoloft (25 MG) tablets with an instruction to give Resident #52 one (1) tablet by mouth daily. This pill pack displayed Resident #52's prescription refill number. The second visible pill pack contained hydralazine (50 MG) tablets with the instructions give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical records review, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to ensure information used to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for medication use was accurate and complete. This was evident for 1 of 57 residents selected for medical record review during annual survey process (Resident #122). The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening questions. On 7/10/19 at 10:00 AM, a review of Resident #122's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to facility with multiple medical diagnoses, including prostate cancer. A review of section I of the resident's quarterly MDS outcomes, dated on 4/11/18, did not include Resident #122's cancer diagnosis as required. The facility must ensure each resident's needs are based on accurate MDS assessments.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #81). The findings include: On 7/11/19 at 9:00 AM the review of Resident #81's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to this facility in June of 2019. Further review revealed Resident #81 received 25 mg of Quetiapine (Seroquel) at bedtime for agitation. There was no evidence in the resident's record to show there was care plan to address the use of Quetiapine 25 mg. A According to the resident's record, the pharmacy had not reviewed the medications since the resident was admitted to the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-16 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence that all nursing staff received education in behavioral health. This was evident for 1 of 4 employee records reviewed during the survey (Resident #12) and and all nursing staff hired prior to 6/15/19. The findings include: On 7/15/19 at around 2:30 PM, a list of all nursing staff including their titles and dates of hire were requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 7/16/19 at 1:12 PM, the Human Resources (HR) Director was interviewed and stated the facility was had a change in ownership in February 2019 and the current owners were provided with partial records for employees. She stated that 29 new employees were hired on 6/5/19, these employees received new hire orientation and education under the current ownership . The HR Director went on to say that she did not have complete education records for the 115 nursing staff that were hired under the previous owner's administration (prior to 6/5/19). On 7/16/19 at 4:00 PM while discussing nursing education records with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-16 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence that all nursing staff had received education on abuse prevention. This was evident for 1 of 4 employee records reviewed during the survey (Staff #12). The findings include: On 7/15/19 at around 2:30 PM, a list of all nursing staff including their titles and dates of hire was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 7/16/19 at 1:12 PM, the Human Resources Director was interviewed and stated the facility had a change in ownership in February 2019, and that she was given only part of the employee records. She stated 29 new employees were hired on 6/5/19 and they received new hire orientation and education from under the current owner's administration. She went on to say she did not have education records for the 115 nursing staff that were hired prior to 6/5/19. On 7/16/19 at 4:00 PM while discussing this with the Director of Nursing (DON), he stated he had the employee education records in his office. He went to his office and returned with records for nursing Staff #12, #13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was updated annually, names of facility leadership had been updated to reflect current staff, and accurate and current resident assessments were included to ensure the facility provided services that meet the needs of the current residents. Specifically, the Facility Assessment most recent update was 02/06/23, did not list current staff names, and resident data was not accurate as it reflected Minimum Data Set (MDS) data from 01/01/22 - 01/30/22. This failure could negatively impact 151 of 151 residents by not assessing and determining the current needs of the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled, Facility Assessment, last reviewed February 6, 2023, revealed the facility assessment had not been updated in 22 months to reflect accurate resident assessments and current staff leadership. Review of the MDS RUG IV Categories, also known as Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM), revealed resident data from 01/01/22 - 01/30/22. During an interview on 11/08/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESCENT CITIES HEALTH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2019 |
| FOREST HOLDINGS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 02/01/2019 |
| BIRNBAUM, ISRAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 22% | since 05/01/2021 |
| KOHN, AVROHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45% | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215323. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.