Libby Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate interventions to prevent physical abuse for 2 (#s 67 and 237), resulting in 1 (#67) getting a broken nose, out of 2 sampled residents; and failed to complete an assessment after the altercation, for 1 (#237) out of 2 sampled residents, as well as not letting him return to the facility after the incident. Findings include: A facility reported incident, dated 6/9/23 at 3:35 p.m., showed: Incident Description: .(Resident #67) was found in his room with a bloody nose; he does have a diagnosis of dementia but states 'He just turned around and hit me.' The 'he' he was referring to was his roommate (Resident #237) who was no longer in the room. Staff immediately went out looking for (Resident #237) to find out he signed out and went to his significant others apartment . Plans were arranged with (Resident #237's) significant other to stay with her for the weekend; medications and belongings were provided for the weekend and (NF2) agreed to keep (Resident #237) in her care for the weekend until further arrangements can be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility licensed nursing staff failed to thoroughly assess two residents for ensuring necessary transport services were provided when residents sustained fractures and head injuries during falls, and the residents were manually pushed in their wheelchairs by a nurse or CNA, to the ER, causing increased pain and risk of further injury due to inappropriate transports, for 2 (#s 238 and 239) of 3 sampled residents; and the ER later reported #238 had fractures in her back. Findings include: During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:09 a.m., staff member I stated, when a resident needed to be transported to the ER, We try not to call EMS if we don't have to, we wheel them down in a wheelchair if it's safe to do so. During an interview on 8/17/23 at 7:21 a.m., staff member E stated, resident #239 was wheeled in a wheelchair, by a CNA, to the ER after her fall, we weren't sure if something was broken. Staff member E stated, It would depend on the severity of the resident's injury whether EMS would be called or staff would wheel them to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident elopement for 1 (#3) of 13 sampled residents. This failure resulted in resident #3 exiting the alarmed facility and walking four blocks, and facility staff returning him to the facility uninjured. The facility had corrected the deficient practice resulting in past non-compliance. Findings include:A review of a facility reported incident submitted to the State Survey Agency showed, on 1/25/26, a staff member was alerted to a door alarm that was going off at an exit door at the end of the hall on the [NAME] side of the building. There was a resident standing by the door who was wearing a Wanderguard. The staff member redirected the resident and checked outside the door and did not see any other residents outside the building. Resident #3 was noted to not be in his room. A search for resident #3 was initiated. During the search time, resident #3's family member, called the facility and reported resident #3 was at the laundry mat four blocks from the facility.During an interview on 6/2/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  4. During an observation and interview on 6/28/25 at 2:50 p.m., the Team 2 medication room was found to have a variety of supplies and medications stacked in the corner and on the floor of the room which was an infection control concern. Staff member C said the room was too small for the amount of medication and supplies stored in the room. Staff member C said she asked administration for shelving to be able to provide more room for medication storage, but it had not been provided, so the items remained on the floor. During an observation and interview on 6/29/25 at 9:52 a.m., the Team 1 medication room had a variety of supplies covering the countertop. A used, personal cup, was in the sink. The counter was soiled and without a cleanable surface, and an infection control concern, due to the number of items stacked on the countertop. The area behind the sink, and the interior of the sink, contained unidentifiable debris adhered to the surface(s). The medication storage refrigerator contained wine boxes and wine spilled and pooled at the bottom of the refrigerator door. The shelves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were complete and matched the current EHR code status for 3 (#s 1, 29, and 65) of 20 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/29/25 at 8:17 a.m., resident #1 stated the physicians wanted her to have a catheter and PEG tube, and she did not ever want any tubes placed for care, including catheters, feeding tubes, or a PEG tube. Review of resident #1's EHR profile reflected resident #1 was a full code, with full treatment, and no artificial nutrition by tube. Review of resident #1's POLST form, dated 9/14/22, reflected resident #1 was a full code, with limited interventions, and had a defined trial period of artificial nutrition by tube to be determined at that time. Review of a POLST, provided by the facility, dated 6/24/25, reflected the resident was a full code, with full treatment to include intubation, advanced airway interventions, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, and no artificial nutrition by tube. This POLST was not signed by the physician. This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to record the temperatures for the medication storage refrigerator, in the team one medication storage room. The deficient practice increased the risk of medications being stored at incorrect temperatures, if the temperatures were not monitored by staff. Findings include: During an interview on 6/29/25 at 9:52 a.m., staff member D said refrigerator temperatures were to be monitored and recorded by staff daily, to be recorded at the beginning of each shift. Record review of a facility document, titled, Fridge Temperature Log, dated June 2025, showed temperature monitoring was recorded for the day shift 16 times over a 29-day period for the month of June 2025. No documentation was included on the form for the day or night shift freezer temperatures.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided during peri care for 1 (#1) of 20 sampled residents. The resident specifically stated she did not want to be exposed. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/29/25 at 8:17 a.m., staff member D and E completed peri care and wound care for resident #1. Resident #1's bed was against the wall under the window. The blinds to the window were not lowered or closed. Staff member E raised the bed to the height of the windowsill when preparing for the care session. Staff member E removed resident #1's brief and rolled resident #1 towards the uncovered window. Resident #1's peri area was exposed throughout the peri care and wound care sessions, and the resident was facing the resident garden area from 8:17 a.m. to 8:40 a.m Resident #1 was then rolled to her left side and wound care was completed. Resident #1's buttocks were then exposed to the window from 8:40 a.m. to 8:51 a.m., and then a brief was placed on the resident. Resident #1 stated, I don't really want to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the elopement of 3 (#s 4, 6, and 7) of 6 sampled residents for elopement; and failed to implement an effective elopement prevention and monitoring system for 6 (#s 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) of 6 sampled residents for elopement risk. This deficient practice increased the risk of an elopement or negative outcome for a resident who was at risk of eloping, due to the system failure. Findings include: Review of facility reported incident for elopements showed: 1. On 8/17/24, resident #6 had been out in the courtyard with another resident. The other resident went back into the building, and resident #6 was found wandering around the outside of the building, by a staff member on break. The resident had stated she got lost and did not know how to get back in the building. A wanderguard bracelet was placed for elopement risk. 2. On 1/1/25, resident #4 was found by an off-duty staff member, across town, by a local restaurant. They notified the facility, and staff picked resident #4 up and returned her to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow admission physician orders related to TED hose/antiembolism stockings for a post op patient for 1 (#2) of 3 rehab patients sampled. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 9:30 a.m., NF1 stated resident #2 had a left total knee surgery on 2/25/25. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. NF1 stated the first night after admitted , the facility staff took resident #2's TED hose stockings off and told her it was the facility policy to prevent skin breakdown. The next morning the stockings were still observed to be off. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 3:15 p.m., staff member D stated they had removed resident #2's TED hose stockings because it was facility policy to remove them at night to prevent skin ulcers. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 11:00 a.m., staff member F stated a physician's order related to TED hose would override a facility policy. Review of resident #2's admission orders, dated 2/26/25, showed, TED Hose on at all times.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it provided behavioral health services to meet the needs of 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents for behaviors. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 3:49 p.m., staff member C stated the trauma informed care assessment was completed on admission, quarterly, and with significant changes. Resident #4 had not triggered on her trauma informed care assessment on admission, which would show if interventions were necessary. Staff member C stated the facility had a contract with a telehealth psychiatrist who was available to residents if they were willing to see the psychiatrist. Staff member C stated resident #4 had a noticeable mental and physical decline in mid-December which was after the initial course of antibiotics. Resident #4 had no involved family, POA, or guardian. The resident's next of kin was a son who lived across the state. Staff member C stated the goal was to discharge resident #4 back to the treatment center she had been at. After resident #4's hospitalization, she was not capable of attending…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure pill contents, contained in personal prescription medication bottles brought from resident homes, were verified before dispensing, for 1 (#2) of 3 rehab residents sampled. Findings include: Review of resident #2's admission orders showed he was admitted on [DATE], arriving around 4:00 p.m., for acute rehab, following a knee surgery on [DATE]. His additional diagnoses included Parkinson's. Review of resident #2's admission orders, dated [DATE], showed the following new medication orders: - Colace 100 mg twice daily, - Acetaminophen 1,000 mg three times daily, - Oxycodone 5 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain, and - Aspirin 81 mg twice daily. Below those medications were resident #2's home medications which the resident would continue taking, which were: - Carbidopa 25 mg-levodopa 100 mg three times daily, - Flomax 0.4 mg daily, - Clonazepam 2 mg at bedtime, - Meloxicam 15 mg daily, - Rivastigmine tartrate 1.5 mg twice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include a resident's history and risk of suicide on the baseline care plan for 1 (#76) of 2 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #76's admission assessment dated [DATE], noted he was being admitted post hospitalization from an overdose. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 4:16 p.m., staff member E stated the nurses did not have any care plan or orders to monitor for suicide risk for resident #76. During an interview on 8/15/24 at 9:12 a.m., staff member C stated resident #76 had a suicide risk assessment and depression screening on admission. Staff member C said due to the assessment results, they determined suicide was not a current issue. Review of resident #76's hospice visits notes, dated on 7/18/24, showed resident #76 was noted to be a suicide risk due to his prior attempts and expressions of not wanting any contact with other humans, or not knowing why he is on earth. Review of resident #76's facility care plan, iniated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADIA HEALTHCARE — 46 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT