No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

PruittHealth-Town Center

6300 Roberta Road, Harrisburg, NC 28075 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (704) 455-5553 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (704) 455-5553 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,018 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-25)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
613 Autumn Dr · (704) 659-1169 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4300 Highway 49 S · (704) 455-6420 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.4 mi
4226 NC-49 S · (704) 455-3100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Town Center Rd · (704) 455-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4245 Main St · (704) 707-6939

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%15.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%7.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%18.3%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%21.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%5.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%14.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%78.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 249 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.6%CMS range 63.0–74.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 9.1–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.8–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
1.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
57.9%
Total nursing turnover
76.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 65.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff, and physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when a resident fell out of bed during incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). Resident #11 sustained a laceration to the right side of his forehead requiring 6 sutures and a C-1 (cervical vertebra #1) fracture that required long-term use of a cervical collar for neck support. Resident #11 did not experience any neurological changes. The findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility 11/6/2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson' disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #11 was severely cognitively impaired, and he required substantial to maximum assistance for bed mobility and incontinence care. A review of the medications for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 11/19/2019 for aspirin 81 milligrams daily. A nursing note dated 2/15/2024 written by Nurse #1 documented the nurse was called to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Physician and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to notify the physician when 70/30 Insulin (type of insulin used to control blood sugar by providing both immediate and extended insulin action) was not administered or administered late for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification (Resident #82). The findings included:Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes.Resident #82's physician orders included an order dated 8/20/25 for Humulin 70/30 insulin 90 units to be given at 8:00AM and 5:00PM with blood sugar checks taken before. The August 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #82 revealed Humulin 70/30 was administered late and not administered on the following dates and times with associated blood sugar values (normal blood sugar levels are between 70 and 99):-On 8/22/25 the ordered 8:00AM Humulin 70/30 90-unit dose was administered at 12:19PM with a recorded blood sugar of 405. The MAR comment specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of controlled opioid pain medication by staff. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #75).The findings included:Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lumbar stenosis with lumbar fusion (a procedures for severe lumbar spinal stenosis, a condition where the spinal canal in the lower back narrows, compressing nerves). Resident #75 discharged home on 9/25/2024. Resident #75 physician orders dated for 9/10/2024 revealed an order for Oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) one (1) tablet every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain on a pain scale of 4-6. Resident #75 Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident #75 was coded as receiving opioids and also on a scheduled pain regimen. A review of the Initial Allegation Report completed by the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to law enforcement and adult protective services (APS) for Resident #10 and report an allegation of misappropriation of medication to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement within the required time frame and did not report the allegation to adult protective services and for Resident #75. The deficient practice occurred for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for reporting of abuse allegations (Resident #10 and Resident #75). The findings included: 1.Resident #10 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Initial Allegation report dated 10/17/2024 and completed by the previous Director of Nursing (DON), and containing the name of the current Administrator, revealed Resident #10 reported “that a man had come to his room the other night and beat him.” The allegation was reported to the DON on 10/17/2024 at 2:00 PM. The State Agency was notified via fax on 10/17/2024 at 2:19 PM. The section of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and physician, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer 70/30 Insulin (type of insulin used to control blood sugar by providing both immediate and extended insulin action) and failed to adhere to administration times as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #82).The findings included:Resident # 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and hypertension.Resident #82 physician orders included an order dated 8/20/25 for Humulin 70/30 insulin 90 units to be given at 8:00AM and 5:00PM with blood sugars taken before. Resident #82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. Resident #82's care plan dated 8/22/25 revealed Resident #82 had a goal to maintain appropriate blood glucose levels and Resident #82 would not have diabetic distress that will require hospital stay through next review period. Resident #82 interventions included: - Monitor blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and solitary pulmonary nodule. A review of Resident #26's physician orders dated 06/04/24 revealed an order for continuous oxygen at 5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. Resident #26's Oxygen Use care plan dated 06/04/24 revealed that his oxygen use was related to COPD with acute exacerbation, and acute on chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included saturated oxygen monitoring, ample time to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and notifying his physician of any changes. A review of Resident #26's Scheduled 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] rated Resident #26 as cognitively intact. He received oxygen therapy during the MDS assessment period. An observation of Resident #26 on 06/16/24 at 11:22 AM found him sitting in his wheelchair, with his eyes closed and the tv on.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove a dented canned good item stored for use, seal open-to-air frozen food, ensure pans were dry before being stacked, and cover facial hair for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents in the facility. The findings included: a. The kitchen was toured on 6/16/2024 at 10:55 with the Assistant Dietary Manager. The rack of canned goods was observed, and a can of spaghetti sauce was noted to have a large dent on the side of the can. The dent was approximately 3 inches long and dented approximately ½ inch into the can, and the paper label on the can was torn in the dent. The Assistant Dietary Manager explained dented cans should be removed from the rack and placed on the shelf labeled dented cans. The Assistant Dietary Manager did not know why the can had not been removed. b. The freezer was observed with [NAME] #1 at 11:15 AM on 6/16/2024. The freezer was observed to have an open box of beef patties, an open box of cube steak, and an open box of fish nuggets.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, Ombudsman, and Social Work interviews, the facility failed to provide a letter of transfer or discharge to residents (Resident #39) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge and failed to send a summary of discharge and transfer residents to the Ombudsman (Resident #47) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings included: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility 10/8/2021. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed on 6/7/2024 she was transferred to the hospital for evaluation after experiencing shortness of breath. The medical record documented Resident #39 returned to the facility on 6/17/2024. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed no letter of transfer or discharge was in the medical record. The Social Worker (SW) was interviewed on 6/19/2024 at 11:42 AM. The SW explained the facility had not been sending letters of transfer or discharge to residents who were sent to the hospital for treatment or discharged from the facility. The SW explained she was not aware the letters should be sent.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately code the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident # 47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit and cerebral vascular accident (CVA). Review of a form titled Observation Detail List Report dated 05/14/24 at 10:40 PM revealed Resident #47 had moderate difficulty hearing and the speaker had to increase volume and speak distinctly. Resident #47 was recorded to use bilateral hearing aids. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 47 was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment was not coded to reflect Resident #47 had a moderate ability to hear at section B0200 and he utilized hearing Aid or other hearing appliance used to hear at section B0300 as required by the RAI manual (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dry 6 of 6 steamer pans before stacking for storage. This had the potential to affect food served to all residents. Findings included: The kitchen was observed on 1/23/2023 at 9:12 AM. A metal shelving unit was noted with stacked steamer pans ready for use. Two medium pans were separated and noted to be wet in between the pans. Two large pans were separated and noted to be wet in between the pans, and two small pans were separated and noted to be wet between the pans. The dietary manager (DM) was interviewed at the time of the observation. The DM reported the pans should have been air dried completely before being stacked for storage and use. The DM reported he thought kitchen staff may have been in a hurry to put the pans up for storage. The DM was interviewed again on 1/25/2023 at 1:02 PM. The DM reported he had talked to the kitchen staff and found that the pans were stacked wet because the staff were rushing to tidy the kitchen. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/26/2023 at 1:27 PM. The Administrator reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to resolve repeated concerns voiced at Resident Council meetings regarding call lights not being answered timely and cold coffee being served for 3 of 6 months (10/27/22, 11/30/22 and 1/4/23) reviewed for Resident Council. Findings Included: A record review of the 10/27/22 Resident Council minutes revealed the following concerns: a. Call lights were being turned off and staff stating they would come back, and they would not come back. The response from nursing was that a nursing staff huddle had been completed to address call lights. A record review of the 11/30/22 Resident Council minutes revealed the following concerns: a. Breakfast and Coffee was cold when received by residents. The response from dietary was the dietary department transfers the food cart immediately to the hall once it is full. Insulated serve ware was being used to retrain heat. The temperatures are checked on the line and the food is hot when it leaves the kitchen. Dietary will discuss the distribution of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-01-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and Director of Nursing interview, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 5 of 5 posted daily staffing forms reviewed. Findings included: Daily staffing forms for 7/16/2022, 9/22/2022, 10/6/2022, 12/31/2022 and 1/17/2023 were reviewed and revealed the following were not accurate on 5 of 5 dates: a. The nursing schedule for 7/16/2022 was reviewed: * The schedule had 2.5 nursing assistants (NAs) to work the day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). The posted daily staffing sheet indicated 3 NAs were providing care in the facility. * The schedule for afternoon shift (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM) had 1 Registered Nurse (RN), 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and 4 NAs scheduled to work. The posted daily staffing sheet indicated 2 RNs, 3 LPNs and 5 NAs were providing care for that shift. * The schedule for night shift (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM) had 1 RN, 1 LPN, and 2 NAs scheduled. The posted daily staffing sheet indicated no RN was providing care, 4 LPN, and no NA were providing care in the facility. b. The nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-26 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to issue the correct form; Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN CMS-10055) to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Resident #1 and Resident #9). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side. Resident #1 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 11/29/22. The last covered day of Medicare Part A service was 1/11/23. The facility provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted and issued a CMS-R-131 form and not a SNF-ABN CMS-10055 form. Resident #1 remained in the facility. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of spondylosis lumbosacral region (spinal osteoarthritis). Resident #9 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 11/18/22. The last covered day of Medicare Part A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff and resident interview the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Residents # 30 and # 44 were not coded for Level ll Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Resident # 206 was not accurately coded for anticoagulant therapy. Findings included: 1.Resident # 30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety, depression and bipolar disorder. A review of a comprehensive annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 30 was not coded for PASRR Level ll at section A 1500 for Level ll PASRR screening and Resident # 30 was not coded at section A 1510 for Level ll PASRR conditions as required by the RAI manual (Resident Assessment Manual). A letter dated 07/14/22 to the facility from the North Carolina Department Of Health and Human Services Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services revealed Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 94 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, TheAthens, GA 1 of 5PruittHealth - Holly Hill, LLCValdosta, GA 1 of 5PruittHealth - LilburnLilburn, GA 1 of 5PruittHealth- AikenAiken, SC 1 of 5PruittHealth- ColumbiaColumbia, SC 1 of 5PruittHealth- Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5PruittHealth-Carolina PointDurham, NC 1 of 5PruittHealth-DurhamDurham, NC 1 of 5PruittHealth-TrentNew Bern, NC 1 of 5PruittHealth-Union PointeMonroe, NC 1 of 5Pruitthealth - AustellAustell, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - Lakehaven, LLCValdosta, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - MaconMacon, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - Magnolia ManorMoultrie, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - Old CapitolLouisville, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - PalmyraAlbany, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - SwainsboroSwainsboro, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - ToccoaToccoa, GA 1 of 5Pruitthealth - West AtlantaAtlanta, GA 2 of 5NC State Veterans Home-KinstonKinston, NC 2 of 5PruittHealth - AugustaAugusta, GA 2 of 5PruittHealth- BambergBamberg, SC 2 of 5PruittHealth- DillonDillon, SC 2 of 5PruittHealth- EstillEstill, SC 2 of 5PruittHealth- Moncks CornerMoncks Corner, SC 2 of 5PruittHealth- RidgewayRidgeway, SC 2 of 5PruittHealth-NeuseNew Bern, NC 2 of 5Pruitthealth - BrookhavenAtlanta, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - CreeksideAugusta, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - DecaturDecatur, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - FairburnFairburn, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - Fleming IslandFleming Island, FL 2 of 5Pruitthealth - ForsythForsyth, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - GriffinGriffin, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - Richmond, LLCAugusta, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - RomeRome, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - SavannahSavannah, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth - Valdosta, LLCValdosta, GA 2 of 5Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLCLutz, FL 2 of 5The Oaks-BrevardBrevard, NC

Showing 40 of 94; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HARGRAVE, RHONDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/23/2021
PRUITT, NEILIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/27/2007
PRUITTHEALTH INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/27/2007

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense26% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 15%Other / private 35%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$376per resident / day
operating cost
$11,439per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$409per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345515. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next