The Greens at Pinehurst Rehabilitation & Living Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with staff, Physician Assistant (PA), Wound Nurse Practitioner, and Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to implement preventative measures for a resident assessed to be moderate to high risk for development of pressure ulcers. The resident developed a deep tissue injury to the sacrum, 2 deep tissue injuries to the left lateral foot, as well as a deep tissue injury to the left ankle. Deterioration of the sacral wound was not communicated to the MD or the PA. The resident was admitted to the hospital with septic shock for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #178) reviewed for pressure injuries. The findings included: Hospital discharge summary indicated Resident #178 was previously living in an assisted living environment for 100+ days prior to being seen in the Emergency Department on 7/24/2023 for acute onset mental status change thought to be caused by a urinary tract infection. The resident was discharged from the hospital to the skilled nursing facility for short term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the area of medications for 2 of 5 residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medication (Residents #93 and #13). The findings included: 1. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysfunction of the bladder, and retention of urine. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #93 from 12/24/25 to 12/30/25 revealed she did not receive an antibiotic medication. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #93 had severely impaired cognition and was coded for an antibiotic during the seven-day assessment period. On 3/18/26 at 3:01 PM, an interview occurred with MDS Coordinator #2. She reviewed the 12/30/25 MDS and Resident #93's December 2025 MAR. MDS Coordinator #2 confirmed Resident #93 did not receive an antibiotic from 12/24/25 to 12/30/25 and that the antibiotic was coded in error on the MDS assessment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation after the initial approval for nursing home placement expired for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #3).The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post traumatic stress disorder.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had not been evaluated by a Level II PASRR and determined to have a serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or other related condition.Review of the admission record revealed Resident #3 was admitted with a Level II PASRR for short term admission that was issued on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. There was no evidence within the medical record to indicate the facility had submitted a referral for another Level II PASRR evaluation to extend approval past the [DATE] expiration date.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews with resident representatives, resident and staff, the facility failed to provide resident representatives and/or residents with the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for care plan participation (Residents #77 and #13). The findings included: 1.) Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #77's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #77's electronic health record indicated neither he nor his Resident Representative were included as attendees during care plan meetings conducted on 10/17/25, 1/13/26 and 3/2/26. An interview with Resident #77 on 3/16/26 at 12:14 PM revealed he had not been invited to a care plan meeting since residing at the facility. Resident #77 stated he was unaware the facility held care plan meetings until he heard others talking about them recently. Resident #77 indicated he would like to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with the Medical Director and staff, the facility failed to administer scheduled medications as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #12).The findings included:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension and constipation.A review of Resident #12's active physician orders for March 2026 revealed the following:An order dated 2/17/26 for Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg. Give one tablet via G-tube two times a day for hypertension. Hold for heart rate less than 65 or systolic blood pressure less than 100.An order dated 2/17/26 for MiraLax 17 gm/scoop (grams per scoop) via G-tube two times a day for constipation.A review of the March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #12 revealed the following:Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg was scheduled for 9:00 AM. Nurse #2 administered the medication at 12:07 PM on 3/16/26.MiraLax 17 gm/scoop was scheduled for 9:00 AM. Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 2 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #6). The findings included:Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including contracture of unspecified joint (left hand) and reduced mobility.A care plan revised on 1/2/25 indicated Resident #6 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with a goal that read Resident #6 would maintain her current level of function. According to the care plan, the resident was dependent on the assistance of one staff with personal hygiene.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 2/14/26 documented Resident #6 as cognitively intact, without rejection of care behavior, and dependent on others for personal hygiene.Review of the bath skin review sheets for Resident #6 for the dates of 3/10/26, 3/14/26, and 3/17/26 revealed only toenail condition was listed.Resident #6 was observed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to clean and dry the syringe used to administer medications and water flushes through a gastrostomy tube/G-tube (a tube that delivers liquid nutrition and medications directly to the stomach) before storing it in a dry plastic bag for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for G-tube feeding management (Resident #12). This deficient practice had the potential to cause bacterial growth and contamination.Findings included:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy status, and aphasia (communication impairment) following a cerebral infarction (stroke).An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 was moderately cognitively impaired and received 51% of more of her total calories from enteral feedings. A review of the active orders revealed Resident #12 had an order for a tube feeding formula to be provided at 72/ml/hr.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Nurse #2 did not administer scheduled medication as ordered. Resident #12 was prescribed scheduled anti-seizure medications to be administered every morning at 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM and Nurse #2 administered the medications 3 and 4 hours late. This deficient practice had the potential to increase seizure activity and affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication error (Resident #12).The findings included:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intractable epilepsy (a seizure disorder that is difficult to manage or treatment-resistant), without status epilepticus (a seizure lasting 5 minutes or multiple seizures occurring close together without the person regaining consciousness in between). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had moderately impaired cognition and was coded as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and the Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to follow its infection control policies and procedures for hand hygiene when the Assistant Director of Nursing failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #12 and Resident #4. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 staff observed for infection control practices (Assistant Director of Nursing). The findings included:The facility's undated policy titled Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures states that alcohol based hand rub (60-95% ethanol or isopropanol) is the preferred method of hand hygiene when hands are not visibly soiled. The policy requires hand hygiene before donning gloves, before handling clean or soiled dressings or gauze, after handling used dressings or contaminated equipment, and after removing gloves. The facility's enhanced barrier precautions protocol states staff are to wear gloves and a gown with high-contact resident activities such as wound care and to perform hand hygiene before and after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to date leftover food items stored for use in the dry goods storage area and in 1 of 1 walk-in coolers. This practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: a. An observation on 12/2/24 at 9:35 AM of the dry goods revealed the following concerns: - an open and undated bag of corn flakes placed in transparent wrapping. - an undated bag of leftover brown sugar stored in a plastic bag that was not sealed. b. An observation of the walk-in cooler on 12/2/24 at 9:45 AM revealed the following concerns: - an undated leftover package of sliced cheese stored in transparent wrapping - an undated leftover package of sliced ham stored in transparent wrapping - a stainless-steel container with cooked mixed vegetables that had not been dated An interview with the Dietary Manager on 12/2/24 at 10:00 AM indicated that she was new in the position. She stated she was responsible for making sure food items were dated and stored properly. An interview with [NAME] #2 on 12/3/24 at 11:10 AM revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the area of accidents (Residents #63, #64 and #17). This was for 3 of 22 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia. A review of Resident #63's medical record revealed he had a fall on 9/20/24 with a minor injury since the quarterly MDS assessment on 8/9/24. The annual MDS assessment, dated 11/9/24, indicated Resident #63 had severe cognitive impairment and was not coded for any falls since the last assessment. On 12/5/24 at 9:50 AM, an interview occurred with the MDS Coordinator, who reviewed the MDS assessment dated [DATE] as well as Resident #63's medical record. The MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #63 had a fall since the last assessment on 8/9/24 and should have been coded for a fall with minor injury. She stated it was an oversight. An interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,844 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $41,844 — penalty dated 2023-09-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC