Lincoln Crawford Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 87.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 80.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect 3 (Resident #55, Resident #58, and Resident #53) of 3 residents ' right to be free from physical/mental abuse by another resident. On 05/26/2025, before the evening meal in the dining room, dietary staff observed Resident #95 attempt to hit their roommate, Resident #55. Dietary staff separated the residents and instructed the residents to go upstairs. Later that evening, staff transferred Resident #55 to the emergency department (ED) due to bleeding from the resident ' s head. While at the ED, Resident #55 stated that Resident #95 hit them multiple times with a cane. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #55 was hospitalized and diagnosed with a fractured right arm, received six sutures to a laceration to their head, and was diagnosed with acute blood loss anemia. The failure to protect Resident #55 from abuse resulted in injuries which left Resident #55 being dependent on staff for all activities of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy for abuse prohibition for 1 (Resident #55) of 2 residents. Specifically, a dietary aide (DA) witnessed Resident #95 attempt to hit Resident #55 in the dining room on 05/26/2025. The staff member separated the residents and directed them to return to the unit where they resided; however, the incident was not reported to the Director of Nursing (DON), the nurse supervisor on duty, or Administrator as required per facility policy. Once Resident #55 returned to their room, the resident stated that Resident #95 struck them in their head with a cane. The failure resulted in a Actual Harm when Resident #55 sustained a laceration to the head with an arterial bleed and a right arm fracture which coupled with previous left arm paralysis, left Resident #55 unable to use their upper extremities and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.Findings include: The facility document titled, Abuse and Neglect Protocol revised 06/13/2021, revealed, It is the responsibility of our…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (300 hall) of 2 shower rooms were maintained in a clean condition. Findings included:An undated facility policy titled, Bathrooms revealed 1. Bathrooms, including showers, whirlpools, century baths, commodes, etc., will be cleaned daily in accordance with our established procedures.An observation on 08/04/2025 at 1:54 PM revealed the 300 hall shower room had pieces of cotton from a wound dressing on the shower floor in stall #1, the floor throughout the entire shower room appeared with a thick brown grime substance on the tiles, a large shower chair with a broken seat which exposed a jagged and sharp appearance along the inner ring, a shower bench/riser with dirty areas and white substance in spots on the seat and rusty metal legs, and multiple open and unlabeled bottles of body wash, peri-wash, and deodorant. The shower nozzle from the shower head was hanging in the downward position to the floor and thick black hair covering all the drains in the three shower stalls. A toilet located in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy, and facility document review, the facility failed to consistently implement a program to ensure resident safety while smoking for 6 (Residents #6, #9, #4, #24, #31, and #49) of 29 residents who smoked. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents did not keep smoking materials in their possession and did not give smoking materials to other residents per the facility's smoking policy and smoking agreement. Findings included:A facility policy, Smoking Policy – Residents, revised 07/2017, revealed This facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. The policy interpretation and implementation directed, 1. Prior to, and upon admission, residents shall be informed of the facility smoking policy, including designated smoking areas, and the extent to which the facility can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences. 6. The resident will be evaluated on admission to determine if he or she is a smoker or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, Form CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] - 10055) for 1 (Resident #14) of 3 residents reviewed for Medicare Beneficiary Protection Notification when discharged from Medicare Part A Services with benefit days remaining.Findings included:A facility policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, dated 03/28/2023, indicated, 2. The facility issues the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS form 10055) for the following triggering events, and the policy continued, 3. Termination - In the situation in which the facility proposes to stop furnishing all extended care items or services to a beneficiary because it expects that Medicare will not continue to pay for the items or services that a physician has ordered and the beneficiary would like to continue receiving the care, the SNF ABN is issued to the beneficiary before such extended care items or services are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of abuse to the Administrator and to the state survey agency within two hours for 1 (Resident #55) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #55 was struck on the head with a metal cane by Resident #95, which resulted in bleeding from a head injury requiring transfer to the hospital for evaluation.Findings included: The facility document titled, Abuse and Neglect Protocol, revised 06/13/2021, revealed, It is the responsibility of our employees, facility consultants, Attending Physicians, family members, visitors, etc., to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and theft or misappropriation of resident property to facility management. 4. Employees, facility consultants and/or Attending Physicians must immediately report any suspected abuse or incidents of abuse to the Director of Nursing Services. In the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #55) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 05/26/2025, Resident #55 was transferred to the emergency department (ED) due to bleeding from their head. Prior to leaving the facility, Resident #55 did not report how the injury occurred; however, the resident's roommate, Resident #95 reported that the resident sustained the injuries from a fall. After arrival at the ED, where Resident #55 was diagnosed with a fractured right arm, a laceration to the head with an arterial bleed, and acute blood loss anemia, the resident told hospital staff that the injuries were a result of Resident #95 hitting them multiple times with a cane. The facility investigation revealed no documented evidence that the facility interviewed all staff who had knowledge of the incident and no documented evidence that they interviewed a resident who witnessed an altercation between the residents. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep fingernails trimmed and clean for a resident (Resident #33) who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, revised 10/2010 indicated, The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. The policy indicated, Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. The policy further indicated Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin.An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #33 on 05/05/2021. The admission Record indicated that Resident #33 had diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic kidney disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2025, revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to treat one (#48) of three reviewed in a dignified manner. The facility census was 85. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, type two diabetes, and lumbago with sciatica. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 08 that indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of email dated 08/05/24 written by the Administrator revealed he had spoken to the Dietician #204 with the referencing an encounter with Resident #48. The Dietician stated she had realized what she had said, was very sorry and that the phrase was her common refrain when giving a banana to her grand kids. Dietician #204 was extremely remorseful, almost to the point of tears. Administrator stated that he comfortably says that she had no negative intention or connotation with her comment. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wound treatment was completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#81) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. Review of physician order dated 08/14/24 revealed right heel wound care was ordered as follows: cleanse with normal saline and pat dry. Apply betadine and let air dry, apply calcium alginate with silver to the wound bed, cover with abdominal dressing, then wrap with Kerlix and apply ace wrap to right foot every day. Interview on 08/26/24 at 9:50 A.M. with Resident #81 revealed his dressing to his right heel had not been changed in a couple of days.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented and the facility failed to complete hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one resident (#81) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #81 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. Review of physician order dated 08/14/24 revealed that Resident #81 treatment for the right heel was as follows: cleanse with normal saline and pat dry. Apply betadine, let air dry, apply calcium alginate with silver to wound bed, cover with an abdominal dressing, [NAME] with Kerlix and apply ace wrap to right foot every day. Interview on 08/26/24 at 9:50 A.M. with Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriate treatment and services for care of a resident who was incontinent of bowel and had a indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (#45) of three residents reviewed for incontinence and catheter care. The facility identified there were 48 residents who were incontinent of bowel and five residents with indwelling catheters. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/26/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, contractures to his bilateral lower extremities, and neurogenic bladder. Review of the care plan dated 08/16/23 revealed Resident #45 was at risk for developing complications secondary to having bowel incontinence and having an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $813K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH