Harrison Pavilion Care Center
2171 Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45211 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 84 certified beds · (513) 662-5800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 26.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.7–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-12-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with facility staff, the Medical Director, and Non-Physician Practitioners (NPPs), medical record review, review of the pre-admission screening form, review of hospital records, review of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of the coroner ' s report, review of facility e-mails, review of the facility timeline investigation, review of the police report, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide adequate behavioral health services for one resident (#231) with a known history of suicidal ideations, paranoia, delusions, and who had a recent hospitalization for suicide ideations. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and life-threatening serious injuries and ultimate death when Resident #231 placed an upright dresser on his neck and committed suicide on [DATE]. This affected one (#231) of 49 residents identified by the facility with a history of suicidal ideations/attempts since the incident on [DATE]. The facility census was 79. On [DATE] at 5:13 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, policy review, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to adequately assess Resident #09's skin, failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcer (a pressure ulcer is a localized injury of the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), until it had reached an advanced stage and failed to timely implement provider ordered interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and/or aid in the healing of existing pressure ulcers. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #09, who was admitted without pressure ulcers but was at risk for the development of pressures and subsequently developed an avoidable, facility acquired pressure ulcer. Resident #09 was assessed by Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP) #60 on 11/04/25 and treatment orders were recommended but not implemented until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2021-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide each resident with a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician, and planned by the Registered Dietitian, and/or receive interventions per the plan of care to ensure the resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status including body weight. This resulted in actual harm for three residents (#22, #40, #74) who experienced avoidable, unplanned significant to severe weight loss and/or failed to maintain their weight or improve weight status per the plan of care. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for one resident (#05) out of eight residents reviewed for Nutrition. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #03's power-of-attorney (POA) was notified of the resident's change in condition status and transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #03) of three records reviewed for notification. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia and Alzheimer's disease. The resident had a designated POA listed in the record. Review of Resident #03's progress note dated 10/10/25, revealed the resident's mental status changed from baseline to increased confusion. The resident's vital signs were temperature 97.7 degrees Fahrenheit, blood pressure 136 over 85 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), heart rate 56 beats per minute and oxygen percentage of 96 percent (%). The physician was notified via voicemail, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of pharmacy records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #45) of three resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 03/19/24. Diagnoses included hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, major depressive disorder, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of the physician order dated 11/11/25, revealed Resident #45 was ordered Meropenem (antibiotic) Intravenous (IV) Solution Reconstituted one gram (gm), use one gram intravenously every eight hours for infected sacral wound for 14 days.Review of the Pharmacy Delivery Receipt dated 11/11/25, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dishware was clean prior to serving pureed meal service. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident who the facility identified as receiving pureed diets. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Record of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/06/24. Diagnoses included dysphagia, epilepsy, mood disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three. Review of the physician order dated 11/21/25, revealed Resident #11 was ordered a regular diet, pureed texture, regular thin consistency.Observation on 11/25/25 at 11:46 A.M., revealed [NAME] #110 obtained a divided plate, which had food particles from previous meal on plate. [NAME] #110 went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were implemented during wound care. This affected one (Resident #09) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 10/20/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis, stage three pressure ulcer to sacrum, atrial fibrillation, and hemiparesis and hemiplegia to right dominant side.Review of the Five-Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #09 had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. This resident was assessed to require dependent with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers.Review of the physician order dated 11/20/25, revealed Resident #09 was ordered to have right buttocks cleansed with normal saline, skin prep to peri-wound, and covered with border foam one time a day for wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and failed to discard expired medications. This had the potential to affect 35 facility-identified residents who receive medications from medication cart number two/back east, from medication cart short front, and from medication cart short back hall. The facility also failed to discard expired medications and supplies stored in the medication room. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 79 residents.Findings include: Observation on 09/10/25 at 9:33 A.M. of the medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #340 revealed there were two bottles of multi-vitamin with iron with an expiration date of August 2025. The medication room also contained a negative pressure wound therapy foam kit with an expiration date of February 2020 and expired bottles of Vital 1.5 tube feeding (10 bottles expired May 2025 and 41 bottles expired August 2025.) Interview on 09/10/25 at 9:35 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored properly and the kitchen was maintained in clean, sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all the residents receiving food from the facility. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include:Observation on 09/08/25 at 10:22 A.M with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed there was a bottle of cleaning spray on the clean dish rack and on the clean dishes there was a piece of cardboard, a soiled rag, and an opened bottle of soda. Observation 09/08/25 at 10:25 A.M of the dry storage area with the DM revealed the following unlabeled and undated items: two bags of elbow pasta, a bag of egg noodles, a container of rolled oats, a bag of croutons. There was also a package of gravy with an expiration date of 07/07/25. Interview on 09/08/25 at 10:30 A.M with the DM confirmed items should not be stored in the clean dish area and the items in the dry storage area should be labeled and dated. The DM confirmed expired items should be discarded. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment after residents received new diagnoses for psychiatric disorders. This affected two (Residents #7 and #76) of four residents sampled for PASARR. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #76, revealed an admission date of 04/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Review of the PASARR for Resident #76 dated 10/21/21 revealed it did not include a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #76 dated 07/22/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Interview on 09/10/25 at 2:57 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility should have completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely treatment for respiratory infections. This affected one (Resident #7) of seven residents sampled for respiratory infections. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/03/18 with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 06/18/25 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the progress note for Resident #7 dated 09/03/25 revealed the nurse practitioner (NP) assessed Resident #7 for complaints of complaint of cough for several days. Lung auscultation revealed concerns for wheezes bilaterally. The NP gave orders for a stat (immediate) chest x-ray and Tylenol cold & flu medication. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #7 revealed an order dated 09/03/25 for a stat chest x-ray. There was no written order for Tylenol cold and flu medication. Interview on 09/08/25 at 11:34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete root cause analysis following resident falls. This affected one (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 79 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 06/17/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and unspecified dementia. Review of care plan for Resident #39 dated 06/18/24 revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Interventions included anticipating resident needs, keeping the call light within reach, maintaining a safe environment, and educating the resident regarding appropriate footwear, using call light for assistance, and safe use of mobility devices. Review of the progress note for #39 dated 02/24/25 revealed the resident had an unwitnessed fall in her room. Staff found Resident #39 seated on the floor in front of her walker. Resident #39 stated she hit her head during the fall. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). The facility had three medication errors per 25 medication opportunities with a medication error rate of 12 %. This affected two (Residents #2 and #44) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 79 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/13/24 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, congestive heart failure (CHF), and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of the physician's order for Resident #2 revealed an order dated 03/13/24 for spironolactone 25 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension and an order dated 03/13/24 for cyanocobalamin 100 micrograms (mcg), give one tablet by mouth one time per day. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 08/19/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen prior to administration. This affected one (Resident #44) of one observed for insulin administration and had the potential to affect two residents on medication cart one on the east hall with physician orders for insulin. The facility census was 79 residentsFindings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 10/31/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #44 dated 08/07/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.)Review of the physician's orders for Resident #44 revealed an order dated 11/11/24 Novolog insulin inject subcutaneously per sliding scale.Observation on 09/09/25 at 12:14 P.M. of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #313 did not prime the Novolog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to measure correct portion sizes to meet resident nutritional needs. This affected one (Resident #73) of one resident with physician's orders for a pureed diet. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Observation of food preparation on 09/11/25 at 11:02 A.M revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #404 used a spatula to scoop pureed stuffed peppers onto Resident #73's plate. Interview on 09/11/25 at 11:03 A.M with DS #404 confirmed Resident #73 was on a pureed diet, and he used a spatula to plate the pureed stuffed peppers for the resident because he did not have the proper scoop.Observation on 09/11/25 at 11:15 A.M reveled DS #404 used a three-ounce scoop when plating Resident #73's mashed potatoes. Interview on 09/11/25 at 11:20 A.M with DS #404 confirmed he used a three-ounce scoop when plating Resident #73's mashed potatoes, but the recipe called for a four-ounce portion of mashed potatoes. DS #404 confirmed he used the three-ounce scoop, because he did not have a four-ounce scoop on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained sterile technique during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident sampled for tracheostomy care. The facility also failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one (Resident #12) of 13 residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 79 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/13/25 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, anxiety disorder, tracheostomy status, and schizophrenia.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 06/14/25 for tracheostomy care every day and night shift and as needed.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 08/08/25 revealed the had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to allow residents who were cognitively intact and were their own persons, the ability to independently sign out of the facility. This affected four Residents (#16, #69, #100 and #400) of the four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility identified 63 Residents (#02, #05, #06, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #35, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #45, #48, #49, #50, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #61, #62, #63, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #75, #76, #78, #79, #80 and #81) as being their own person without a guardian at the facility and was able to sign themselves out of the facility if desired. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included ataxia following other cerebrovascular disease, insomnia, atherosclerotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of discharge notices, the facility failed to permit a resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge from the facility without the proper documentation regarding the need for discharge from the facility or the physician. This affected one Resident (#400) of the three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility also failed to allow a resident to remain in the facility for the duration of their discharge notice. This affected one Resident (#100) out of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #400's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, schizoaffective disorder and constipation. Resident #400 discharged from the facility on 02/10/25. Resident #400's census information revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge summary included a recapitulation of the resident's stay. This affected one Resident (#400) out of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge summaries. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #400's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, schizoaffective disorder and constipation. Resident #400 discharged from the facility on 02/10/25. Resident #400's census information revealed Resident #400 was his own responsible party. Review of Resident #400's medical record from 11/08/24 to 02/12/25, revealed no documentation a discharge notice was given to Resident #400. Review of Resident #400's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #400 was cognitively intact, was independent with eating, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of police report, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. This affected one (#34) resident out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 80. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 07/19/16 with medical diagnoses of hypertension (HTN), nephrotic syndrome, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and schizophrenia. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #34 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS did not indicate any behaviors. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed a nurse progress note, dated 01/08/24 at 6:00 A.M. with stated Resident #34 reported to the nurse that his roommate, Resident #84,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and pain specialist staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a pain specialist appointment was scheduled and failed to effectively manage a resident's pain. This affected one (#84) resident out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 80. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 11/11/23 with medical diagnoses of HTN, peripheral neuropathy, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed a discharge date of 02/13/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #84 was cognitively intact and required supervision with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed a Nurse Practitioner (NP) note, dated 01/18/24, which revealed Resident #84 stated his current pain management was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines when administering medications. This affected one (#70) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 80. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 03/19/08 with medical diagnoses of depression, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #70 had moderate cognitive impairment and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed a physician order dated 11/27/21 for metformin 500 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth daily for DM, an order dated 01/13/22 for metoprolol 25 mg one tablet by mouth daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications administered intravenously (IV) were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This deficiency affected four (Residents #3, #25, #37, and #42) of four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected 26 current residents (#3, #4, #10, #13, #14, #15, #18, #25, #30, #31, #34, #35, #37, #41, #42, #44, #46, #50, #56, #63, #66, #67, #69, #78, #79 and #81) and twelve discharged residents (#85, #86, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, and #96) identified by the facility who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This deficiency affected four (Residents #3, #25, #37, and #42) of four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected 26 current residents (#3, #4, #10, #13, #14, #15, #18, #25, #30, #31, #34, #35, #37, #41, #42, #44, #46, #50, #56, #63, #66, #67, #69, #78, #79 and #81) and twelve discharged residents (#85, #86, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, and #96) identified by the facility who received IV fluids from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices,, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This deficiency affected four (Residents #3, #25, #37, and #42) of four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected 26 current residents ( #3, #4, #10, #13, #14 #15, #18, #25, #30, #31, #34, #35, #37, #41, #42, #44, #46, #50, #56, #63, #66, #67, #69, #78, #79 and #81) and twelve discharged residents (#85, #86, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, and #96) identified by the facility who received IV fluids from the unlicensed source. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #3 revealed the resident admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect 82 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: During observation of the kitchen refrigerator on 09/25/23 at 9:21 A.M., there was a plastic container in the refrigerator with sliced cucumbers with no label of the contents, only a date; a block of cheese, opened, with no label or date; a large plastic container of what appeared to be mushrooms with a date, however, no label to confirm what it was; a large bag of peppers with no label or date; a large plastic container of what appeared to be juice located on a shelf in the refrigerator with no label or date. Next to the large container of juice was another large plastic container with a large clump of unknown food inside it. Dietary Manager (DM) #82 stated at the time of the observation it was juice with fruit and that was what was left of the fruit. It did not contain a label or date. There were two large plastic containers containing flour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-03 · tag F0920 — widespreadProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a dining room to eat their meals. This had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents that receive meals from the dining room. The facility identified one (Resident #19) who did not receive his meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Observation of the dining meals throughout the week of the annual survey revealed the residents did not utilize the facility dining room. Review of Resident #07's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/13/23, with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus 2, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, insomnia, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), obesity, and osteoarthritis. Review of quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #07 revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed he was independent from the need of assistance with his meals. Interview on 10/02/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to their care plan meetings. This affected four (#18, #28, #47, and #233) of four residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she an admission date of 09/25/20, with diagnoses including: anemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes mellitus 2 (DM2), hyponatremia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, depression, asthma, respiratory failure, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #18's care conferences revealed her last completed care conference was 12/09/21. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/11/23, revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed she required limited assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Resident #18 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment in maintaining resident's rooms in good condition. This affected four (#03, #21, #36, and #233) of 83 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #03's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/19/08, with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes mellitus 2, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/12/23, revealed Resident #03 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed he required supervision assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Observation on 10/03/23 at 10:11 A.M., revealed Resident #03's bathroom entry wall was busted with exposed dry wall, the window seal had a cracked edge with pieces missing, the air conditioning unit was broken with the facing hanging off, all along with the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, grievance report review, spread sheet review, email communication review, policy review, resident interviews, staff interviews, Registered Dietician interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate portion sizes and substitutes according to the approved menus/spreadsheets. This had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents who were served food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#19) did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the facility form titled, Grievance/Complaint Report, dated 07/03/23 revealed Resident #40 stated he was, getting small portions, and would like more protein. Interview on 09/25/23 at 1:53 P.M., with Resident #7stated the facility only provides small portions of food. Resident #7 stated he will ask for more food and staff will tell them they are out of food. A follow up interview with Resident #07 on 10/02/23 at 3:44 P.M., revealed the facility had an issue in the kitchen over the weekend and was unable to utilize the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment by maintaining shower rooms and ensuring there was enough plates and silverware to serve meals. This had the potential to affect up to 50 of 83 residents who reside in the faciltiy. Excluding Resident #19, who does not receive food and a total of 59 residents who do not utilize the shower rooms. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:24 A.M., of the shower room located by the central services room revealed the air vents contained large amounts of fuzzy dust and dirt hanging off them in a fringe- like manner. The shower room contained black sludge like substances around the bottom of the shower room walls and on the floor of the shower room. The shower room had busted tile with exposed wall. Interview on 09/26/23 at 9:24 A.M., with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #83 confirmed the air vents in the shower room located near the central supply room had fuzzy, dust and dirt hanging off the vents. STNA #83 confirmed the shower contained a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the assistance to obtain a pair of shoes. This affected one (#64) of 24 residents sampled during the annual survey. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/22. His diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, essential tremor, intellectual disabilities, osteoarthritis, cervical disc degeneration of the cervical region, intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, chronic pain syndrome, ischemic cardiomyopathy, personal history of traumatic brain injury, occlusion and stenosis of the bilateral carotid arteries, hypothyroidism, type II diabetes, with diabetic neuropathy, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact and needed supervision for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #64's podiatry visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Pre-admission Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #24. The facility failed to complete a PASARR review for Resident #63 in a timely manner following the expiration of the Hospital Exemption Notification System ([NAME]) approved stay at the facility. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70's PASARR was completed correctly by failing to identify mental health diagnoses. This affected three (#24, #63 and #70) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #24 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included antisocial personality, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, bipolar disorder, depression, and altered mental status. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment revealed he required extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to identify the root cause of the fall during a Hoyer lift transfer. This affected one (#47) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census is 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/09/23, with diagnoses including: heart failure, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus 2, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/15/23, for Resident #47 revealed she was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed she required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #47 was totally dependent on staff for assistance with transfers and toilet use. Resident # 47 was independent with eating. Review of nursing progress notes for Resident #47 revealed a nursing note created on 06/21/23 at 7:09 P.M. and effective for 06/21/23 at 11:15 A.M. revealed, the resident stated the Hoyer lift tipped while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and observations, revealed the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available and provided timely to a resident to maintain pain management. This affected one (#1) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/07, with diagnoses including age-related osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of physician's orders dated 09/18/23 for Voltaren (diclofenac sodium) gel 1%, apply two grams (g) topically to wrist and arm every day and night shift. Observation and interview on 09/25/23 at 11:08 A.M., revealed Resident #1 was noted to be shaking her left forearm, wrist, and hand. Resident #1 stated that she had arthritis and it hurt. Resident #1 reported that she told the nurse, and she was given pain medication, but it still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of gnats. This affected the kitchen area. The facility census was 83. Findings include: During observation during the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 09/25/23 at 9:21 A.M., a large, soiled cookie sheet pan had drain flies flying around the pan. During interview at the time of the observation, Dietary Manager (DM) #82 confirmed the facility has an issue with gnats in the drain. Review of the pest control billing statements revealed the facility had been treated for gnats on 08/14/23. The statement stated the Kitchen has very poor sanitation. Please focus on keeping the dishwasher area clean please. Review of the policy titled Pest Control, dated May 2008, stated, the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program and the building is kept free of insects and rodents. This deficiency represents noncompliance discovered during complaint investigation of Complaint Number OH00146416.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of online guidance per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected four (#39, #58, #61 and #80) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/25/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure (CRF) with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus (DM), anxiety disorder, cerebral infarction, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #39 dated 08/11/23 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the physician orders for Resident #39 revealed an order dated 09/08/23 for strict room isolation with all services provided in the room due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-12-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of facility assessment, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete and update the facility assessment. This affected all 79 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: Review of facility assessment on 11/19/21 at 1:00 P.M. indicated the tool was last updated on 01/28/21. Review of Part one (Resident Profile), section 1.5 (Acuity), example three revealed no documentation for Activities of Daily Livings (ADLs). Review of Part three (Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for Residents Population Daily); under section 3.2 (Staffing Plan) revealed a blank staffing assessment. Under section 3.8 (Physical Environment and Building/Plant Needs) revealed a blank assessment. During interview with Administrator on 11/19/21 at 4:30 P.M. verified the assessment was not completed and updated. Review of updated facility policy titled Facility Assessment revealed the facility assessment was conducted annually to determine and update the capacity to meet the need of and competently care for our resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-12-21 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director was properly certified. This affected all residents who resided in the facility. Facility census was 79. Findings included: During the extended survey review on 11/19/21 at 2:00 P.M. revealed no certification for Activities Director. Interview with Activities Director #29 on 11/19/21 at 3:00 P.M. verified she was not certified as Activities Director. Activities Director #29 stated she was enrolled in the National Certification Council for Activity Professionals and anticipated to complete the course and be certified in February 2022. Review of National Certification Council for Activity Professional documentation indicated Activities Director #29 was enrolled on 10/19/21.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, policy review, and review of online resources per the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent spread of infectious diseases including the Coronavirus 2019 (Covid -19) virus. This had the potential to affect all 79 residents. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment properly to prevent the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) and failed to ensure contracted staff had temperature taken and completed a signs and symptom screen for COVID-19 prior to entering the resident area. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for four (#73, #74, #75, #76) residents residing in the facility's COVID-19 unit. The facility census was 79. 1. Observation on 11/15/21 from 08:00 A.M. to 04:30 P.M. revealed the facility listed a sign on Resident #278's door stating she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide dining services for residents in a dignified manner which enhanced their quality of life. This affected seven Residents (#45, #40, #75, #65, #9, #14, #36) out of a total facility census of 79. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/15/21 at 8:25 A.M. of breakfast being served on the [NAME] Hall revealed the residents were served their hot meals in Styrofoam take out containers, also known as clamshells. The menu specified that residents were served hot or cold cereal, scrambled eggs with ham bits, and toast that morning. Interview on 11/5/21 with [NAME] #45, while touring the central kitchen at 8:38 A.M., affirmed that all residents were served their breakfast in Styrofoam containers this morning. [NAME] #45 sated that Styrofoam was used this morning due to not having enough staff. Observation on 11/15/21 at 5:41 P.M. revealed that residents in the middle and back of [NAME] hall, including resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that when a resident formulated an advanced directive the resident's advanced directive was accurately recorded in all locations of the medical record to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed as directed in the event of an emergency. This affected four residents (#22, #40, #74, and #5) of six residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute glaucoma, diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia, mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 09/20/21 revealed the resident was assessed as having moderate cognitive losses, was understood and able to understand, and required the physical assistance of one staff person to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility investigation, review of facilities self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of medical records, and review of facilities Abuse Investigating and Reporting Policy, the facility failed to prevent potential further neglect during their investigation with ( Resident #231) when he had committed suicide in the facility. This had the potential to affect 49 Residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #08, #09, #15, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #28, #32, #34, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #43, #44, #45, #47, #48, #49, #52, #53, #55, #58, #61, #64, #65, #69, #76, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, and #94) whom the facility identified as having a history of suicidal ideations/attempts after the suicidal incident [DATE]. The facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #231 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a valid Pre admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) was in place for three Residents (#24, #29, and #231) out of three residents reviewed for PASRR screenings. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #24 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, asthma, diabetes mellitus 2, respiratory failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #24 revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, and bathing. He did not require any assistance from staff with eating and was totally independent with this task. Review of the Hospital Exemption…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on chart review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide baseline care plans upon admission. This affected two Residents (#27 and #71) . Furthermore, the facility failed to complete a baseline careplan accurately for one Resident (#231) out of 21 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The in-house facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #27 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety, bipolar, dysuria, overactive bladder, anemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 has mild to moderate cognitive deficits, requires supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs), with extensive assistance locomotion, and is continent of bowel and bladder. Review of medical records revealed they were silent related to the admission baseline care plan. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed resident was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Record Review of Resident #77 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, history of coronavirus (COVID) 19, and acute respiratory failure. Review of her 5-day admission MDS assessment, dated 11/08/21 revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact and she required supervision assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, and supervision assistance with personal hygiene, toilet use, eating, and dressing. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 10/11/21 for Resident #77 had a fall and new fall were listed as bed at lower position and floor mats at bedside. Review of Resident #77's fall care plan revealed the facility initiated encourage resident to allow for needed assistance on 10/07/21, fall mats to the side of the bed while in bed initiated on 10/29/21 and bed in lowest position while in bed initiated on 10/29/21. However, the review of Resident #77's fall care plan did not indicate Resident #77 refused to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were smoking safely. This affected six Residents (#11, #31, #53, #57, #73, and #230) out of 29 residents identified by the facility as smokers. The facility failed to ensure resident safety while moving around in wheelchair affecting one Resident #77, and failed to put non-skid strips in bathroom to prevent falls affecting Resident #29. The in-house facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #11 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, depression, hypertension, diaphragmatic hernia, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, and dysphagia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had no cognitive deficits, requires extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Care Plan dated 10/25/21 revealed Resident #11 is a supervised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician personally approved in writing a recommendation for residents being admitted . This affected 21 residents (#12, #14, #15, #17, #22, #24, #27, #29, #33, #37, #40, #42, #71, #74, #76, #77, #78, #81, #229, #231, and #328) of the 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #231 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, hypertension, restless and agitation, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #231 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Section-D (Resident Mood Interview) indicated resident had feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and interview with facility Medical Director (MD), medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician and Non-Physician Providers (NPP) wrote, signed, and dated progress note at each visit. This affected 25 Residents (#05, #12, #14, #15, #17, #19, #22, #24, #29, #30, #34, #36, #37, #40, #48, #53, #71, #76, #77, #79, #81, #82, #229, #231, and #328) of the 31 sampled residents. Facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #231 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, hypertension (HTN), restless and agitation, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #231 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required limited assistance with activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were properly disposed. This affected one medication room, and four medication carts out of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The in-house census was 79. Findings include: Observation on 11/16/21 at 3:05 P.M. through 4:00 P.M. of the medication room with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed three chocolate ensure plus supplements with expiration date of 02/21, one bottle of fiber heal 15 Grams FIBER with expiration date of 06/21, six bottles of Vitamin B6 100 milligrams (mg) with expiration date of 04/21, four bottles of Vitamin B6 250 mg with a expiration date 07/21, one bottle of fish oil 500 mg with expiration date of 07/21, two bottles of vitamin B12 100 micrograms (mcg) with expiration dates of 08/21 & 09/21, and six bottles of vitamin E with expiration date 06/21. Continued observation with the DON of the East medication cart #1 revealed the following expired medications in cart: calcitrate 200 mg with expiration date 07/21, vitamin B12 100 mcg with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of nutrition services agreement, and review of personnel records, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate skills and competencies necessary to carry out the function of the dietary department related to food and nutrition services. This had the potential to affect 77 of 79 residents of the facility , excluding residents #16 and #19 who received enteral feedings and nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: An initial tour of the central kitchen was conducted on 11/15/21 at 8:38 A.M. with [NAME] #45. There was no supervisor evident on duty. [NAME] #45 was on duty and reported that Dietary Manager (DM) #48 was on vacation. He stated he had been employed as a cook at the facility for about 4 weeks. During tour of the central kitchen it was observed the kitchen was equipped with a single compartment low temperature dish machine with manufacturer's minimum wash and rinse operating temperatures of 120 Fahrenheit (F), and used a sanitizing agent to sanitize the dishes/silverware etc. with a chemical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of the dietary staffing schedule, and review of the facility mealtime cart schedule revealed the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department. This had the potential to affect 77 of 79 residents of the facility, excluding residents #16 and #19 who received enteral feedings and nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation on 11/15/21 at 5:52 P.M. of residents being served their evening meal revealed that as of 5:52 P.M. the residents on the back [NAME] hall had not been served. Review of the facility's mealtime cart schedule revealed the time the last cart was scheduled to leave the kitchen for the evening meal, which was the back [NAME] cart, was 5:20 P.M. Interview on 11/15/21 at 5:59 P.M. with the staff person serving as the evening cook, Housekeeping Aide (HA) #37 reported she was picking up i.e. working in the kitchen all week. She reported that she was the cook today, and will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and review of planned menus, the facility failed to follow the planned menus as approved by the Registered Dietitian for residents on mechanical soft and pureed diets, resulting in resident's not receiving all planned menu items necessary to meet their nutritional needs. This directly affected four Residents (#22, #71, #48, and #43) who were on texture modified diets, and had the potential to affect six additional Residents ( #72, #77, #62, #38, #40, #64) with physician's order for texture modified diets; mechanical soft or pureed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute glaucoma, diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia, mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 09/20/21 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of planned menus, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide food that was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This affected seven Residents (#30, #40, #9, #14, #36, #45, and #75) and had the potential to affect a total of 77 of 79 residents, excluding residents #16 and #19 who received enteral feedings and nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation on 11/15/21 at 8:25 A.M. of breakfast being served on the [NAME] Hall revealed the resident's were served their hot meals in Styrofoam take out containers, also known as clamshells. The menu specified that residents were served hot or cold cereal, scrambled eggs with ham bits, and toast that morning. Interview on 11/15/21 at 11:30 A.M. with Resident #30 revealed that he found the food at the facility to be served cold. He stated that the food was always cold, need seasoning, and that is was served on Styrofoam just about every meal. Interview on 11/5/21 with [NAME] #45, while touring the central kitchen at 8:38 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and review of planned menus, the facility failed to prepare the planned menus as approved by the Registered Dietitian for residents on mechanical soft and pureed diets, to ensure residents received food prepared in a form designed to meet their individual needs per physician orders and the comprehensive plan of care. This directly affected five Residents (#22, #48, #43, #40, and #71) who had physician orders for texture modified diets, and had the potential to affect five additional residents ( #72, #77, #62, #38, and #64) with physician's orders for texture modified diets; mechanical soft or pureed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute glaucoma, diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia, mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 77 of 79 residents of the facility , excluding Residents #16 and #19 who received enteral feedings and nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: An initial tour of the central kitchen was conducted on 11/15/21 beginning at 8:38 A.M. with [NAME] #45. While touring the kitchen the following was observed: a) The walk-in refrigerator that contained all the facility's refrigerated food, with the exception of milk, lacked an internal thermometer. The exterior thermometer indicated the temperature was 39 degrees Fahrenheit (F). [NAME] #45 affirmed there was no thermometer inside the refrigerator. b) The floor of the walk-in freezer was littered with pieces of what appeared to be a cubed meat product and other frozen food products. c) The milk cooler lacked a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and family/representative interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify each resident's family/representative when the resident experienced an unplanned significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#78) of 31 residents reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an acute care hospital, with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments and required the extensive assistance of one staff person to complete activities of daily living with the exception of eating for which he was assessed as being independent with set-up help only. The resident and no natural teeth and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility investigation, review of facilities self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of medical records, and review of facilities Abuse Investigating and Reporting Policy, the facility failed to report an incident of possible neglect to the State Agency when a resident was found on the floor with a dresser on neck and determined deceased by emergency medical services (EMS). This affected one Resident (#231) of the 31 sampled residents. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #231 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, hypertension, restless and agitation, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #231 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required limited assistance with activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to properly notify the Ombudsman program of resident hospitalizations. This affected two Residents (#03 and #29) out of five residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #03 revealed he had an initial admission date of 05/12/11. He was recently admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and then re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acquired absence of right leg above knee, acquired absence of left leg above knee, end stage renal disease, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperkalemia, nutritional deficiency, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene, acute respiratory syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, dementia without behavioral disturbance, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct initial or periodic assessments of each resident's activity interests. This affected one Resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for Activities. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute glaucoma, diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia, mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 09/20/21 revealed the resident was assessed as having moderate cognitive losses, was understood and able to understand, and required the physical assistance of one staff person to complete activities of daily living. Review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed no documentation related to activities, activity assessment, or activities progress note since initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised. This affected two Residents (#77 and #29) of the 31 residents sampled. The facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #77 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, history of coronavirus (COVID) 19, and acute respiratory failure. Review of her five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/21 revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #77 revealed she required supervision assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, and supervision assistance with personal hygiene, toilet use, eating, and dressing. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 10/11/21 for Resident #77 had a fall and new fall interventions were listed as bed at lower position and floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide professional services while administering medications to residents on therapeutic diet. This affected one Resident #71 out of one resident identified by the facility on thickened liquids. The in-house facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 10/13/21 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, muscle weakness, constipation, encephalopathy, diabetes, hypertension, altered mental status, and magnesium deficiency. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 has mild cognitive deficits, requires extensive assistance with activities of daily living, limited with personal hygiene, and is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of care plan dated 11/02/21 revealed Resident #71 has a swallowing problem related to coughing or choking during meals or swallowing medications. Swallowing assessment result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide each resident an ongoing program of activities designed to support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected one Resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for Activities. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, absolute glaucoma, diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia, mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 09/20/21 revealed the resident was assessed as having moderate cognitive losses, was understood and able to understand, and required the physical assistance of one staff person to complete activities of daily living. Review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed no documentation related to activities, activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to conduct consistent assessments of resident's skin condition per a licensed nurse. This affected three (#40, #70, #78) of three residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility also failed to conduct regular pressure ulcer risk assessments which affected two (Residents #40 and #70) of three residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to document a description of impaired skin integrity which required intervention per physician's order which affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/18/17 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #40 dated 11/25/21 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of pressure ulcer risk assessment for Resident #40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident's oxygen tubing was dated, documented, and changed weekly per facility policy. This affected one Resident (#30) reviewed for respiratory care, out of 10 residents identified by the facility as receiving oxygen therapy. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, alcoholic liver disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) of the resident dated 10/08/21 revealed the resident had good memory and recall, and received oxygen during the assessment period. Review of the resident's physicians orders revealed an order for oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents medical records were complete and accurately documented. This affected two Residents (#03 and #231) of the 31 sampled residents. Facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #231 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, hypertension, restless and agitation, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #231 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Section-D (Resident Mood Interview) indicated resident had feelings of being down, depressed, or hopeless, and no thoughts of self-harm. Review of psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) #169 progress notes dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to provide each resident with a safe, functional, and sanitary environment which was clean and in good repair. This affected five Residents (#74, #30, #40, #24, and #77) out of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 79. 1. Observation of the resident sleeping room and bathroom occupied by Resident's #30 and #40 on 11/15/21 at 9:56 A.M. revealed the cover to the baseboard heater in front of the toilet was missing exposing sharp edges of the heating element and there were multiple gnats in the bathroom. The floor behind the head of Resident #30's bed was heavily soiled with food and other debris and his privacy curtain was stained and soiled with a large dark grayish/black in area near the resident's head. Resident #30 confirmed the privacy curtain was soiled. Interview with Resident #40 on 11/15/21 at 4:44 P.M. stated there were gnats in the bathroom he shared with Resident #30 as water has been leaking out of the bottom of the toilet. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-08 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KING, CRYSTAL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/01/2021 |
| STERN, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2013 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $463K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365065. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.