No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Countryside Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation LLC

1865 Countryside Drive, Fremont, OH 43420 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 82 certified beds · (419) 334-2602 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20262 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$59,623 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $59,623 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
2000 Countryside Dr · (419) 334-6377 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
600 E State St · (419) 332-1505 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.8 mi
2096 Enterprise St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1970 Countryside Pl · (419) 334-4495 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.7%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.641.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.431.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.5%CMS range 43.3–66.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 3.8–15.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
73.3%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 73.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-03)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of hospital records, review of the death certificate, review of staff witness statements, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were served foods in the correct texture to meet individual needs and further failed to ensure residents were accurately assessed for supervision needs during meals. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 01/16/26 for one (#77) resident who experienced serious life-threatening harm and negative health outcomes resulting in death when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #151 served Resident #77, who had a physician ordered mechanical soft texture diet (foods are ground, chopped, or naturally soft), a regular texture sandwich during an evening snack. Subsequently, Resident #77 choked, lost consciousness, and required staff intervention to perform the Heimlich maneuver (a first-aid method for choking that includes abdominal thrusts),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, interview with Wound Care Nurse Practitioner (NP) #700, review of hospital records, review of an incident report, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of witness statements, and review of a policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#09) was free from avoidable burns inflicted by a staff member. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries and/or death when on 12/05/23 at approximately 2:45 A.M., State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #195 used her personal lighter in an attempt to remove a diabetic wound dressing from Resident #09's right foot. Subsequently, Resident #09's wound dressing was set on fire, causing the resident and STNA #195 to catch fire, and Resident #09 was later hospitalized and treated for first-degree (top layer of skin) and second-degree (first two layer of skin) burns. This affected one (#09) of one resident reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a facility investigation, review of hospital documentation, policy review, and review of facility corrective action documentation, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate level of care and assistance was utilized during resident bathing which resulted in an avoidable fall. Actual harm occurred when Resident #22 was being bathed by one staff member when the resident's care plan indicated the resident required a two-person assist for bathing and the resident's abilities were known to fluctuate. Resident #22 was rolled to her side while in bed and was rolled onto the floor which necessitated the resident to be sent to the hospital for an evaluation. Resident #22 was determined to have sustained a left hip fracture which required surgical intervention. This affected one (#22) of five residents reviewed for falls. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This affected all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.Observation on 05/12/26 at 12:53 P.M. of Resident #42's room revealed the area immediately surrounding the resident's toilet was discolored with a sticky, amber-colored substance, with miscellaneous pieces of black debris adhered to the surface. Further observation of Resident #42's restroom revealed the windowsill was broken and could be lifted off the wall. Additional miscellaneous debris was observed scattered throughout the resident's room floor. Interview on 05/12/26 at 12:53 P.M. with Resident #42 revealed she did not feel the facility did an adequate job of keeping her resident room and restroom clean to her satisfaction. Interview on 05/12/26 at 1:25 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #501 verified the sticky, amber-colored substance with miscellaneous pieces of black debris…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility investigation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to report misappropriation of controlled substances for destruction to the State Survey Agency. This affected ten (#82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, and #91) of 20 residents reviewed for controlled substances for destruction. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the facility investigation dated 11/14/24 revealed controlled medications removed from use for disposal were not present in the facility and there was no evidence of destruction. The following medications were missing: nine oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 milligram (mg) tablets and 59 oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablets for Resident #82; 60 oxycodone 5 mg tablets and five oxycodone tablets for Resident #83; 11 oxycodone 5 mg tablets for Resident #84; 10 oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablets, 11 oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablets, and 42 oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablets for Resident #85; 33 oxycodone 10 mg tablets for Resident #85; 14 oxycodone 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for two (#9, #32) of three residents reviewed for fall prevention. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident smoking assessments were completed affecting two (#13, #40) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 11 residents (#13, #20, #29, #36, #40, #42, #52, #56, #58, #61, and #64) as smokers in a facility census of 65. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, spinal lumbar stenosis, anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, major depression, intellectual disability, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and polyarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 with intact cognition, psychosis related hallucinations and delusions, range of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident representative and physician notification after a change in condition. This affected two (#62 and #76) of two residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with reentry on 07/01/24. Diagnoses included conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, dementia, major depression, anxiety disorder, cerebral aneurysm, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of nursing progress note, dated 07/23/25, revealed Resident #62 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The resident was having slurred speech, was weak, and trembling while trying to walk. Resident #62's blood pressure was slightly elevated and resident stated the writer had two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy was provided during incontinence care. This affected one (#9) of 20 residents observed for privacy in a facility census of 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed and admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, spinal lumbar stenosis, anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, major depression, intellectual disability, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and polyarthritis.Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 with intact cognition and was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living. Observation on 05/13/26 at 11:25 A.M. revealed Activity Aide #146 propelled Resident #9 in his wheelchair to his room, activated the call light, and proceeded to exit the room. At 11:26 A.M. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #170 and CNA #181…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care with removal of facial hair was provided to one (#49) of three residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] with reentry on 10/15/24. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/23/26, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairement and required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Observation on 05/12/26 at 7:53 A.M. of Resident #49 revealed the resident had numerous and long facial hair on her upper lip and chin. Interview on 05/13/26 9:01 A.M. with Resident #49 verified she would like to have her facial hair shaved. Observation on 05/14/26 at 11:33 A.M. of Resident #49 revealed the resident continued to have numerous and long facial hair. Interview on 05/14/26 at 11:35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders were obtained for the use of a sling and failed to ensure follow up orthopedic consults were obtained for one (#76) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 01/24/25 and discharge date of 12/18/25. Diagnoses included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of health status note dated 10/30/25 at 6:18 P.M. revealed the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) gave orders to send the resident to the Emergency Department (ED) for decreased mobility to left upper extremity due to pain and swelling. The resident transferred to the ED for evaluation and treatment.Review of ED documentation dated 10/30/25 revealed Resident #76 presented with a fall. The resident complained of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinent residents received timely and effective incontinence care. This affected two (#5, #9) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care and services in a facility census of 65. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, obesity, panic disorder, chronic respiratory failure, venous insufficiency, depression, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, generalized edema, hypertension, venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 with intact cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the Continence Care assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was noted with a history of urinary tract infections, incontinent of varying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fluid restrictions identified how much allowed per discipline and shift, failed to document fluid intakes, and failed to obtain daily weights. This affected two (#11 and #76) of two residents reviewed for fluid restrictions. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1.Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/31/23. Diagnoses included polyarthritis, psychosis, hoarding disorder, adjustment disorder with anxiety, anemia, and osteoarthritis.Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of care plan dated 03/11/26 revealed the resident has the potential for dehydration or potential fluid deficit and was non-compliant with fluid restrictions. Interventions included limited to 1200 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction per 24 hours. The care plan did not break down the fluids per shift or discipline.Further review of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed by the physician with an error rate of less than five percent. This affected one (#45) of one resident observed for gastrostomy tube medication administration. A total of 27 medication opportunities with seven errors were observed for an error rate of 25.93 percent. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 05/12/26 at 7:59 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #502 preparing Resident #45's medications for administration via the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)) tube. RN #502 crushed one multivitamin, one glycopyrrolate 1 milligram (mg) tablet, one furosemide 20 mg tablet, one Eliquis 5 mg tablet, one Baclofen 10 mg tablet, and one famotidine 20 mg tablet. RN #502 then placed the medications together (cocktailed) in the same cup with 50 milliliters (ml) of tap water. RN #502 also obtained levetiracetam (Keppra) oral solution 20 ml 100 mg/ml solution and poured to a 30 ml medication cup. At 8:07 A.M. RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident beds were properly maintained in a safe manner. This affected two (#5, #9) of 20 residents reviewed for safe integrity of beds in a facility census of 65. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, obesity, panic disorder, chronic respiratory failure, venous insufficiency, depression, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 with intact cognition. no recorded behaviors and dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility. Review of the nursing plan of care dated 01/13/25 addressed activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit with an intervention including quarter upper bilateral side rails for bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of clean linen was available to meet the residents' needs. This had the potential to affect all 46 (#32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, and #78) residents who resided on the third floor. The facility census was 76. Findings include:Interview on 02/26/26 at 7:27 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #137 revealed there was no linen available to wash the residents. CNA #137 revealed, at times, towels were used instead of wash cloths. Interview on 02/26/26 at 7:33 A.M. with CNA #189 revealed it was common to not have linens available and stated pillowcases have been used to wash residents. Observation on 02/26/26 at approximately 7:40 A.M. of the third floor linen storage revealed there were six towels and no wash cloths available for 46 residents. Interview on 02/26/26 at 8:04…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#47) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, essential hypertension, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/07/26, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and did not receive insulin. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 10/18/25 at 9:09 P.M., revealed the resident was given 15 milligram (mg) of glargine Lantus (long acting insulin) and it was not prescribed. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified and gave an order to check the residents bp (not specified what this meant) every hour for six hours. The resident's current blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of pharmacy documentation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store resident insulin in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected nine of (#16, #22, #36, #41, #44, #53, #56, #59, and #272) 14 residents identified by the facility to receive insulin administration in a facility census of 69. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/27/25 at 12:29 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #525 during review of medication storage of the third floor C medication cart discovered two insulin pens. One Lantus insulin pen prescribed to Resident #16 was open with no date when it was opened. A second insulin aspart pen prescribed for Resident #41 was marked as opened on 04/01/25. Interview with LPN #525 at the time of the observation identified pharmacy guidance documentation on the medication cart binder. The pharmacy guidance listed medications with shortened expiration dates. This included instructions indicating Lantus insulin and aspart insulin expired 28 days after opening or removing from refrigerator. LPN #525 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure services required by the state-designated mental health authority were provided to residents. This affected one (#18) of two residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) requirements. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and psychophysiologic insomnia. Review of Resident #18's PASARR results, dated 12/16/24, revealed the resident was referred for a level II evaluation. Review of Resident #18's PASARR level II evaluation results dated 01/13/25 revealed a determination was made that the resident was approved for a nursing facility with specialized services. The nursing facility was required to provide the resident with specialized behavioral health services including a comprehensive psychiatric assessment in order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to to ensure residents who required staff assistance with activities of daily living received adequate and timely care to maintain appropriate personal hygiene including nail care. This affected one (#46) of four residents reviewed who required assistance with nail care and personal hygiene. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/27/21. Diagnoses included profound intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, seizures, scoliosis, lactose intolerance, and gluten sensitivity. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required supervision or touching assistance with toilet use, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #46 displayed no behaviors during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and interview, medical record review, review of a facility policy, and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program designed to meet the interests and care needs of residents with intellectual disabilities. This affected one (#46) of one residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/27/21. Diagnoses included profound intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, seizures, scoliosis, lactose intolerance, and gluten sensitivity. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required supervision or touching assistance with toilet use, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #46 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #46's care plan revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were implemented as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and treatment in a facility census of 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, transient ischemic attack, contracture of the right and left lower leg, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, had resistive behaviors interfering with care, was assessed with delusions and hallucinations, had bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of therapy documentation, the facility failed to ensure an individualized restorative program was implemented to ensure residents maintained range of motion and mobility. This affected one (#35) of one residents reviewed for limited range of motion and mobility. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, depression, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], and the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #35 had limited mobility on one side in both the upper and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care and treatment in a facility census of 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, transient ischemic attack, contracture of the right and left lower leg, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, had resistive behaviors interfering with care, had delusions and hallucinations, had bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, dialysis communication documentation, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received physician ordered medication for residents receiving hemodialysis. This affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for the administration of hemodialysis in a facility census of 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic anemia, heart failure, hypotension, chronic pain, asthma, hypertension, and cardiac defibrillator. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with intact cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the nursing plan of care dated 07/25/24 revealed the plan of care was revised to address Resident #38's risk for developing complications secondary to needing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and therapy documentation review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely rehabilitation services. This affected one (#272) of three residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #272 revealed an admission date of 05/15/25 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and depression. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #272 had intact cognition, had limited range of motion to both sides of her lower extremities, was dependent for transfers and toileting, and required partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. Review of the physician order dated 05/15/25 revealed Resident #272 should receive a physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech therapy (ST) evaluation and treatment as needed. Review of Resident #272's PT evaluation and plan of treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a McGeer criteria checklist, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was appropriately implemented with use of antibiotic medications. This affected two (#22 and #59) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/27/20 with diagnoses of dementia, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/18/25, revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Review of the urine culture obtained on 03/19/25, and reported on 03/22/25, revealed Resident #22's urine was positive for 10-15,000 colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter (ml) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 10-15,000 CFU/ml of Enterococcus faecalis. Interview on 05/29/25 at 11:31 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed Resident #22 received the antibiotic doxycyline to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) identified on 03/19/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive nephrostomy care to a resident. This affected one (#47) of one resident reviewed for nephrostomy tubes. The facility identified one resident who had a nephrostomy tube used in his care at the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hydronephrosis, mild protein calorie malnutrition, and acute kidney failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had mild cognitive impairment with no behaviors, nephrostomy tubes and was always continent of bowel. Resident #47 required maximal assistance with toileting, lower body dressing, and chair to bed transfers, moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with personal hygiene and bed mobility. Review Resident #47's care plan revealed the resident had nephrostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of written statements, review of self-reported incidents, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected one (#74) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 02/14/24 with medical diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and history of methamphetamine withdraw. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed on 02/28/24 at 6:17 P.M. the resident was noted with increased weakness and confusion. Further review of the progress notes 02/28/24 revealed Resident #74's confusion began on 02/27/24 following a fall. Resident #74 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and was admitted with aspiration pneumonia. Resident #74 returned to the facility on [DATE], and review of hospital records revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident elopement. This affected one (#38) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record identified she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, emphysema, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #38's plan of care dated 02/07/20 revealed the resident was at risk for elopement and had interventions in place to prevent elopement included admission to the secured unit on the third floor and an electronic alarming devise placed to the resident's ankle. Further review of the plan of care revealed Resident #38 was not cognitively capable of making safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), and review of the facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure resident preferred bathing schedules were honored. This affected one (#09) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #09 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, cellulitis, heart disease, dysphagia, arthritis, pain in left foot, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/18/23, revealed Resident #09 was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. The resident had a diabetic foot ulcer with applications of ointments/medications and dressings to feet. Review of the plan of care, revised 10/09/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of the witness statements, review of nursing staff schedules, review of local law enforcement records, resident interview, staff interview, review of a facility policy, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure a resident received assistance with incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected one (#05) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included permanent atrial fibrillation, hypertension, epilepsy, vertigo, heart failure, muscle weakness, anxiety, and end stage renal disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), and review of the facility investigation, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing to ensure a resident's preferred bathing schedule was honored. This affected one (#09) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #09 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, cellulitis, heart disease, dysphagia, arthritis, pain in left foot, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/18/23, revealed Resident #09 was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. The resident had a diabetic foot ulcer with applications of ointments/medications and dressings to feet. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans provided accurate activities of daily living (ADL) interventions. This affected four residents (#19, #39, #51, and #57) out of 16 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, COVID-19, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, other forms of angina pectoris, visual hallucinations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, chronic venous hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and Barrett's esophagus with dysphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #19 was identified as requiring extensive two person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 01/21/23 revealed Resident #19 was care planned for having ADL self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility's temperature logs, and review of the facility's posted guidance, the facility failed to ensure food items reached the appropriate internal temperature before serving the items to residents. This affected 12 residents (#04, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #34, #36, #42, #54, #57, and #214) out of 64 residents receiving meals in the facility. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation on 02/22/23 at 11:20 A.M. revealed the Dietary [NAME] (DC) #402 taking temperatures of all food items on the tray line in preparation for meal service. The temperature of mechanical soft Salisbury steak was 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the temperature of the reheated, leftover lasagna was 148 degrees F. Interview on 02/22/23 at approximately 11:25 A.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) #01 revealed the mechanical soft meat should be at least 155 degrees F. The DC #402 acknowledged the information but did not reheat the mechanical soft Salisbury steak. Interview on 02/22/23 at approximately 11:27 A.M. with the DC #402 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in good repair. This affected one resident (#17) out of 64 residents reviewed. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation on 02/21/23 at 10:44 A.M. of the wall behind Resident #17's bed revealed the base of the head of the bed was in the wall, inside crumbing plaster. There was no plaster or debris on the floor. Observation on 02/22/23 at 11:32 A.M. revealed the wall behind Resident #17's bed continued to be in disrepair with a large hole in the plaster. Subsequent interview with Resident #17 revealed she had been concerned for mice, rats, and bugs coming through the wall but had not seen or heard any. Resident #17 stated her wall had been repaired once a while ago but has now been damaged for an unknown amount of time with no repair. Interview on 02/22/23 at 11:34 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #702 verified there was a large deep hole at the head of Resident #17's bed. STNA #702 verified there was no debris on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interview, review of the medical record, review of the grievance log, review of the self reported incidents, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of misappropriation. This affected one resident (#01) out of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 04/18/19 with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 had slightly impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and hygiene, was totally dependent on two staff for transfers, and was totally dependent on one staff for eating. Review of a progress note dated 12/25/22 revealed Resident #01's family spoke with staff about missing items in Resident #01's room. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate. This affected three residents (#20, #57, and #61) out of 22 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypoxemia, malignant neoplasm of endometrium, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, hypertension, chronic pain, generalized anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, benign neoplasm or uterine tubes and ligaments. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Section O of the assessment revealed hospice was not selected as a current special treatment, procedure, or program. Review of the physician order dated 11/02/22 revealed an order for hospice to follow resident care. Interview on 02/23/23 at approximately 9:00 A.M., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, review of the medical record, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wound dressing was completed per physician orders. This affected one resident (#22) out of six residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/27/20 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety disorder, chronic fatigue, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and dressing, extensive assistance of one person for hygiene, and was independent with setup help only for eating. Review of the a physician order dated 02/15/23 revealed Resident #22 should receive silvadene cream to open red areas on abdomen, and cover with bordered gauze dressing twice daily, once on each shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of the facility in-service, the facility failed to ensure staff reheated food to a safe temperature to prevent burns. This affected one resident (#16) out of one resident reviewed for hazards. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 01/15/19 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, difficulty in walking, and unspecified dementia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting, extensive assistance of one person for hygiene, and was independent with setup help only for eating. Review of a physician order dated 12/16/22 revealed Resident #16 received a diet order of consistent carbohydrate and renal restrictions, mechanical soft textures, thin liquids, and chopped meats. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility urinary catheter care policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate technique was implemented to prevent cross contamination. This affected one resident (#22) out of three residents identified with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census 64. Findings include: Resident #22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety disorder, chronic fatigue, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and other specified abnormal findings of blood chemistry. According to the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #22 with intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and dressing, extensive assistance of one person for hygiene, and was independent with setup help only for eating. Further review revealed Resident #22 had an indwelling catheter. On 04/20/20 the physician ordered indwelling urinary catheter (Foley catheter)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide accurate documentation of wound care completed in the medical record. This affect resident two residents (#19 and #22) out of six residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, COVID-19, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, other forms of angina pectoris, visual hallucinations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and Barrett's esophagus with dysphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/24/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #19 required limited assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene and dressing and extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Resident #19 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and had a stage four pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives listed in the medical record were accurate. This had the potential to affect two residents (#19 and #45) of three reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/29/19 with diagnoses including pulmonary fibrosis, depressive disorder, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 08/29/19 revealed an order for the resident to be a Full Code. Review of Resident #19's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) identification form dated 09/18/19, revealed the resident was identified as having Do No Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). The DNRCC form was signed by the physician. Review of Resident #19's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2019 listed the resident as a Full Code. Review of Resident #19's information profile of the electronic medical record identified the resident's code status as full code.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all residents were given an opportunity to take part in the planning of his/her own care. This affected two residents (#22 and #39) of 25 residents reviewed. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Further review revealed no documented evidence the resident was invited to attend and/or attended a care planning conference. Interview on 11/24/19 at 10:16 A.M., with Resident #22 revealed she had no recollection of being invited to or attending a care planning conference since her admission on [DATE]. Interview on 11/25/19 at 1:25 P.M., with the Social Service Director (SSD) #220 revealed she was responsible for scheduling care planning conferences with residents and/or resident's representatives. SSD #220…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pulse oximetry levels were monitored as ordered by a physician. This affected one Resident (#19) of six reviewed who were ordered to monitor pulse oximetry levels. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/29/19 with diagnoses including pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney disease, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #19's care plan dated 09/10/19 revealed the resident had been addressed as having altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to pulmonary fibrosis. Interventions included to monitor for increased respirations, decreased pulse oximetry, and increased heart rate. Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 11/16/19 revealed an order to wean off oxygen and keep pulse oximetry above 92%. Review of Resident #19's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated November 2019 revealed no evidence of any pulse oximetry levels documented. Interview on 11/25/19 at 9:34 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted daily as required. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation of the facility on 03/04/24 at 6:30 A.M. revealed the facility consisted of three floors with a main lobby on the first floor. Further observation revealed the nurse staffing information was located at a desk on the first floor, and the posted nursing staff data was from 02/29/24. Interview with Human Resources (HR) #300 on 03/04/24 at 7:48 A.M. confirmed the nursing staffing information currently posted in the facility was dated 02/29/24. HR #300 confirmed she called off work on on 03/01/24, therefore, the posted nursing staffing information had not been updated since 02/29/24. This deficiency represents an incidental finding discovered during investigation under Master Complaint Number OH00151470.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-02-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the daily staff posting, staff interview, and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the staff posting included the actual hours worked by nurses and aides in the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation of the daily staff posting from 01/22/23 through 02/21/23 revealed the document included the date, the daily census, and the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA). The staff posting did not include the actual total hours worked by the RNs, the LPNs or the STNAs. Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 02/21/23 revealed the facility required nurses to work 60 to 75 hours per day and STNAs to work 98 to 130 hours per day. Interview on 02/23/23 at 11:02 A.M. with the Medical Records #01 revealed the staff posting included only the number of staff scheduled that day.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$59,623 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-03
  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Carver Living CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Harrison Pavilion Care CenterCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Meadowbrook Care CenterCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Smoky Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterPigeon Forge, TN 1 of 5The Greens at GastoniaGastonia, NC 1 of 5Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterTaylorsville, NC 1 of 5Weakley Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterDresden, TN 2 of 5Cedars Of Lebanon Care CenterLebanon, OH 2 of 5Clovernook Health Care And Rehabilitation CenterCincinnati, OH 2 of 5Louisville Gardens Care CenterLouisville, OH 2 of 5Ridgewood Living & Rehabilitation CenterWashington, NC 2 of 5Solon Pointe At Emerald RidgeSolon, OH 2 of 5The Greens at HickoryHickory, NC 2 of 5The Greens at LincolntonLincolnton, NC 2 of 5The Greens at ViewmontHickory, NC 2 of 5Willow Ridge Of NCRutherfordton, NC 3 of 5Flint Ridge Nrsg & Rehab CtrNewark, OH 3 of 5Lincoln Crawford Care CenterCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Meadow Wind Health Care CenterMassillon, OH 3 of 5Northcrest Rehab And Nursing CenterNapoleon, OH 3 of 5Pineville Rehabilitation and Living CenterPineville, NC 3 of 5Scarlet Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCincinnati, OH 3 of 5The Greens at HendersonvilleHendersonville, NC 3 of 5The Greens at Pinehurst Rehabilitation & Living CePinehurst, NC 3 of 5The Greens at Spruce PinesSpruce Pine, NC 4 of 5Cedarview Care CenterLebanon, OH 4 of 5Sunrise Nursing Healthcare LLCAmelia, OH 4 of 5The Greens at Maple LeafStatesville, NC 4 of 5The Greens at WeavervilleWeaverville, NC 4 of 5Twilight Gardens Nursing And RehabilitationNorwalk, OH 5 of 5Locust Ridge Healthcare LLCWilliamsburg, OH 5 of 5The Greens at CabarrusConcord, NC

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FREMONT HOLDINGS TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST88%since 08/01/2018
STERN, JACOBIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$871K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 10%Other / private 14%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $871K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,605per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next