Cedars Of Lebanon Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 42.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) report, review of hospital records, review of witness statements, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from staff-to-resident physical abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #10 was physically abused by Stated Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #101 who restrained the resident's arms against his chest causing numerous skin tears and contusions to the resident's arms and hands. Subsequently, Resident #10 was transferred to a local hospital where he was assessed and treated for injuries including, multiple skin tears, and contusions of the elbow and forearm. This affected one (#10) out of three Residents (#10, #12, and #25) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of the medical revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic non pressure ulcer of the right heel, lymphedema, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic pain syndrome, neuroleptic induced Parkinsonism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), insomnia, cellulitis of the right lower limb, mood disorder, personality disorder, cardiomyopathy, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hypothyroidism.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition, had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, temperature log review, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions. This affected all 44 residents receiving food from the facility. The facility total census was 44. Finding include: 1. Observations on 10/15/24 at 8:50 A.M., revealed the following: • In the reach in refrigerator there were packages of grated cheese and sliced cheese with no date. • The stove had an a black substance built up of the appearance of grease on the stove surface ad in the heating elements. There as a built up of wet substance with the appearance of grease on the hood louvers above the stove cooking surface. • There was one large food storage bin label sugar with the food scoop stored on top of the sugar. Two large food storage bins containing foods were not labeled. • There three opened hamburger bun packages without open dates. • The ice machine had a pink substance constant with mold on the inside were ice was stored. • In the reach in freezer, there were three open packages of food with no open dates and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review, interview, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure all staff received education on mental and behavioral health. This affected three State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs)(#505, #504 and #503) of five STNAs reviewed for mental and behavioral health training. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. The faciliy census was 44. Findings include: Review of the facility Assessment updated 07/29/24 revealed the facility is a 45-bed secured facility specializing in behaviors and mental health. The facility has a majority of long-term residents with the entire facility specializing in mental and behavioral health. There is no specific unit or area designated for the behavioral or mental health residents. The facility provides staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide care and support needed for our resident population. The facility provides the following training topics and competencies that include but is not limited to care/management for persons with dementia and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0559 — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, census review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents or resident's representatives were notified of room changes. This affected four residents, (#4, #11, #19 and #146) of four residents reviewed for room change notification. The facility total census was 44. Findings include: Review of the faciliy census dated 10/03/24 revealed Resident #4, #11 and #146 resided in the same room. 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/03/19. Diagnoses for Resident #4 included: Schizophrenia, bipolar disease, diabetes, and Parkinsonism. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment, dated 07/9/24, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required supervision with ambulation. The resident received antipsychotic medication due to delusion and aggression due to schizophrenia. Review of notes dated 10/03/24 at 6:23 P.M., revealed Resident #4 and Resident #146 had a physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record reviews, menu spread sheet review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prepare foods as planned by the Registered Dietitian. This affected four (#6, #15, #16 and #39) of four residents reviewed for pureed diets. The facility total census was 44. Finding include: Review of Residents #6, #15, #16 and #39's physician orders verified the residents were to receive a puree consistency diet. Review of the menu spreadsheet of the lunch meal revealed the puree residents were to receive four ounces of puree green beans and puree honey mustard chicken tenders. According to the recipe, the chicken tenders were to be prepared with the honey mustard sauce. Observation on 10/16/24 at 12:18 P.M., of the lunch meal revealed [NAME] #810 served Residents #6, #15, #16 and #39, pureed coleslaw instead of puree green beans as listed on the spreadsheet. The [NAME] #810 pureed the chicken with a gravy mix and water. Interview on 10/16/24 at 12:20 P.M., with [NAME] #810 verified Residents #6, #15, #16 and #39 should have received puree green beans.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected three (#08, #38, and #29) of four residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 44. Findings include, 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record an admission date of 03/12/24, with diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive sleep apnea (COPD), history of tuberculosis, insomnia, anemia, and heart failure, and major depressive order. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated , 09/12/24, revealed Resident #38 was cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #38 was dependent on staff for medication administration, eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing. Observation and interview on 10/15/24 at 10:52 A.M., revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #900 verified Resident #38 was seated in his chair. STNA #900…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, Self-Reported Incident report review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of resident to resident physical abuse and allegation of sexual abuse by unknown person, to the state agency. This affected two (#06 and #19) of four residents reviewed for potential abuse. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review for Resident #06's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/21/09. Her diagnoses included, cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, hallucinations, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM), schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, anemia, and insomnia. Review of Resident #06's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/04/24, revealed she had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #06 was dependent on staff for medication administration, lower body dressing, and bathing. Resident #06 required maximum assistance from staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, Self-Reported Incident report review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of resident to resident physical abuse and allegation of sexual abuse by unknown person. This affected two (#06 and #19) of four residents reviewed for potential abuse. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review for Resident #06's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/21/09. Her diagnoses included, cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, hallucinations, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM), schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, anemia, and insomnia. Review of Resident #06's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/04/24, revealed she had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #06 was dependent on staff for medication administration, lower body dressing, and bathing. Resident #06 required maximum assistance from staff with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, form instruction review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed as required. This affected two (#15 and #01) of four residents reviewed for PASARR's. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE], with current diagnoses of schizophrenia, malignant neoplasm base of tongue and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, moderate assistance with oral hygiene, bed mobility and transfers and maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #15's Level of Care Determination completed by the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio, dated 07/12/12, revealed Resident #15 had no indications of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment. This affected three (#06, #19, #35) of four residents reviewed for environment The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1, Record review for Resident #19 revealed she as admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypothyroidism, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, insomnia, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident#19 revealed she was cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed she required supervision from staff with eating, oral hygiene, toilet use, dressing and personal hygiene. Interview and observation on 10/15/24 at 9:41 A.M., with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #900 verified the wall behind Resident #19's bed was soiled with dirt and debris. STNA #900 verified various circles of white drywall repair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $249K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH