Flint Ridge Nrsg & Rehab Ctr
1450 West Main Street, Newark, OH 43055 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (740) 344-9465 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.8% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.8%CMS range 46.7–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.7–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.0–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a severe weight loss for Resident #2, a resident who received all nutrition via enteral feedings. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 72. Actual Harm occurred on 08/03/24 when Resident #2 was assessed to sustain a 10.55% weight loss (with the weight loss occurring between 07/30/24 and 08/03/24). The dietician was not notified and no new nutritional interventions were implemented. The resident continued to lose weight resulting in a 13.8% severe weight loss within 30 days of admission. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, total colectomy, gastrostomy, acute kidney failure, hemodialysis and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the care plan titled At Nutritional Risk secondary to nothing by mouth (NPO)-tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-09-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37 was comprehensively assessed for pain and failed to develop an individualized pain management program to timely identify and prevent pain associated with the resident's pressure ulcers. This affected one resident (#37) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The census was 72. Actual Harm occurred on 09/05/24 when Resident #37 was observed yelling and moaning during pressure ulcer (wound) care. There was no evidence the facility identified the yelling/moaning was related to pain associated with the pressure ulcers and/or wound care and no evidence the facility provided any type of pain medication prior to the dressing change which included treatment of a Stage IV (defined as full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) pressure ulcer. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve the resident's ability to carry out activities of daily living. This affected one (Resident #93) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75.Findings include:Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/13/23. Diagnoses include sarcoid myocarditis, sarcoidosis of other sites, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, other vascular myelopathies, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, seizures, anxiety, major depressive disorder, retention of urine, insomnia, GERD, iron deficiency anemia, obesity, hypothyroidism, hypopituitarism, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis, essential (primary) hypertension, and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic neuropathy.Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected nine residents (#19, #30, #36, #46, #49, #59, #65, #76, and #83) of 15 residents receiving medications during afternoon medication administration and had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing on the Main Unit hallway. The facility census was 80.Findings Include: An observation on 08/28/25 from 11:45 A.M. to 12:25 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #234 completed noon medication administration on the Main Unit hallway. RN #234 prepared and administered medication for Resident #52, returned to the medication cart to begin preparation of medications for Resident #83 without sanitizing or washing hands. RN #234 administered Resident #83 ' s medications and returned to the medication cart to prepare Resident #30 ' s medications without sanitizing or washing hands. RN #234 administered Resident #30 ' s medications and returned to the medication cart to prepare Resident #36 ' s medications without sanitizing or washing hands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were kept at appropriate temperatures while serving food. This affected two residents (Resident #35 and #61) and had the potential to affect 69 out of 76 residents, with five residents who received nothing by mouth (NPO) diets. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Interview with Resident #61 on 04/28/25 at 12:09 PM revealed that he often does not receive his preferred beverages during meals. Observation of his meal ticket showed orders for milk and apple juice, neither of which were present on his tray at the time of observation. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #450 at the same time confirmed that milk and apple juice were not provided with the resident's meal. Additionally, Resident #35's nephew reported that food often arrives cold to the room. Observation of the meal service on 04/29/25 at 12:34 P.M. revealed the following food temperatures were taken at the end of the resident dining hall: Baked chicken: 126.1 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) Mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve food in a manner that to prevent contamination. This had the potential to affect 71 out of 76 residents with five residents being on nothing by mouth (NPO) diets. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 04/28/25 at 8:59 A.M. revealed multiple items including: undated and unlabeled shredded cheese in a platic container, a bag of shredded cheese which expired in March 2025, cinnamon rolls in the freezer that were opened with no label or expiration date, peas that were both loose in a box and in a bag in the freezer with no label or expiration date, cinnamon streusel coffee cake mix with an arrive date of January 2025 with no expiration date, four bags of opened cereal with no label or expiration date. Observation on 04/28/25 at 9:15 P.M. revealed the ice machine had black grime on the inside above the ice with water dripping from this area onto the ice. Interview on 04/28/25 at 9:18 A.M. with Dietary manager #456 confirmed all of the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan timely for one resident (#73) of five sampled for unnecessary medications and failed to complete a baseline care plan for one resident (#29) of one sampled for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/24 and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, hypothyroidism, chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity, and anxiety. Review of Resident #73's baseline or initial care plan revealed that it was not signed as complete until 09/05/24. Review of Resident #73's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the admission MDS revealed the resident required substantial/maximum assist for eating, was dependent for all other activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were held for two residents (#18 and #53) of two residents sampled for care planning. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/15/23, a re-entry date of 12/15/24 and diagnoses including insomnia, vitamin B 12 anemia, asthma, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, anxiety, other seizures, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #18's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/28/25 for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday with a chair time at 7:45 A.M. Review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating the resident has a mild cognition impairment. Resident #18 was on dialysis. In an interview on 04/28/25 at 3:12 P.M. Resident #18 stated she did not remember ever having a meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for Resident #14. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 had adequate ADL assistance with his fingernails. This affected two (Resident #14 and #38) of four residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/30/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, weakness, traumatic ischemia of muscle, muscle weakness (generalized), dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase), unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, syncope and collapse, adult failure to thrive, tachycardia, essential hypertension, epilepsy, and acute kidney failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #38, dated 02/09/25, revealed a Brief interview for mental status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive wound management program to promote healing of Resident #35's pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #35) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 1/25/17 and a re-entry on 8/16/17. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, mood, or anxiety disturbances; stage 4 pressure ulcer (the most severe type of pressure injury, characterized by full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, bone, or tendon) of other site; type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications; unspecified intellectual disabilities; unspecified glaucoma; major depressive disorder (recurrent and unspecified); presence of a cerebrospinal fluid drainage device; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and hydrocephalus. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was follow-up care and monitoring for Resident #38's contracted wrist. This affected one (Resident #38) out of one residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/30/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, weakness, traumatic ischemia of muscle, muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #38, dated 02/09/25, revealed a Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognitive skills for daily decision-making. Additionally, Resident #38 required supervision for eating and oral hygiene, maximum assistance with toileting, showering, upper and lower body dressing, and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and manufacturer;s instruction review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of potential accident hazards. This affected one resident (#46) of three sampled for accidents. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/13/19 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, major depressive disorder, repeated falls, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as she was rarely/never understood when speaking. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #46 substantial/maximum assist to roll from lying on her back to her left or right side, and to then return to lying on her back on the bed. Resident #46's MDS indicated she was dependent for transfers from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory studies to ensure therapeutic medication levels were achieved. This affected one resident (#17) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/09/13 with a hospital stay starting on 01/16/25 and ending with the resident's return on 01/19/25. Further review of Resident #17's medical record revealed diagnoses including a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, chronic kidney disease stage four, dementia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, anxiety, osteoarthritis, unspecified psychosis, epilepsy, hypertension, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #17's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating the resident has a mild cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was appropriate. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #40 revealed an original admission date of 12/23/22 with a re-entry on 09/20/24. Diagnoses included unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysphagia in the oropharyngeal phase, cognitive communication deficit, Enterococcus as the cause of disease classified elsewhere, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, bilateral hearing loss, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, urinary retention, cardiac murmur, hypertension, and nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/17/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4, an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility map accounted for all resident rooms and resident rooms provided a safe environment for residents. This affected five residents (#67, #68, #73, #97 and #99) of 25 residents residing on the Serenity Hall. The facility census was 72. Findings include: On 09/03/24 between 2:26 P.M. and 2:50 P.M., observation with Maintenance Director (MD) #326 revealed the following: a. Observation of the posted floor plans revealed Resident #97 and #99's room was labeled as a storage room. There was no evidence of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the floor plan. Interview with MD #326 at the time of the observation verified the facility had been approved in January 2024 for the storage room to be designated as a resident room; however the name plate outside room [ROOM NUMBER] stated Storage Room with masking tape listing the resident names and there was no room [ROOM NUMBER] labeled on the facility maps. b. Observation of Resident #67 and Resident #68's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, dietary meal card review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ordered serving size and ensure whole milk was available for the breakfast meal. This affected seven residents (#19, #28, #41, #54, #71, #73 and #83) who were to receive whole milk and had the potential to affect any resident receiving meals from the kitchen except for seven residents (#17, #23, #67, #74, #78, #84 and #86) who did not receive anything by mouth. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of the Menu Extension dated 09/04/24 revealed breakfast meal included hot or cold cereal, juice, eight ounce glass of whole or 2% milk, six ounces of juice, four ounces of breakfast casserole (scrambled eggs with peppers) and a slice of toast. Review of the breakfast Dietary Meal Cards for Resident #19, #28, #41, #54, #71, #73 and #83 revealed daily items included whole milk. On 09/04/24 at 7:20 A.M., observation of the milk cooler revealed no whole milk was available for the breakfast meal. On 09/04/24 at 7:34 A.M., observation of the breakfast meal trayline service revealed [NAME] #309…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents except seven residents (#17, #23, #67, #74, #78, #84 and #86) who did not receive anything by mouth. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. On 09/04/24 between 7:06 A.M. and 7:20 A.M., observation of the kitchen with [NAME] #309 verified the following: a. The stove hood above the steamer and six burner stove and flat top had large loose, flaking paint with exposed rust extending the length of metal and in the corner/creases of the hood. b. Dust tendrils were observed blowing from the diamond shaped grating on both sides of the stove hood over the steamer and flat top. Heavy dust and grease build up was observed on top of the stove hood, along the electrical outlet boxes and wire guards adjacent to the stove and behind the dishwasher storage racks containing clean dishes ready for meal service. c. Dust and grease build up was observed on the exhaust fans above the trayline service area. 2. On 09/04/24 at 1:13 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified meal experience. This affected one resident (#24) of four residents observed during meal service in the dining room. The census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, dysphagia and cognitive communication disorder. On 09/03/24 at 11:55 A.M., observation of the dining room revealed Resident ##24, #25, #27 and #81 were seated at a table in the dining room. Resident #25, #27 and #81 were served their lunch meals and observed being verbally cued and/or physically assisted with their meal by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #374. Resident #24 was observed sitting at the table watching Resident #25, #27 and #81 eat their food, and would randomly look at the other residents' eating their meals and then looking around the dining room. On 09/03/24 at 12:05 P.M., STNA #330 was observed bringing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice before a resident's room was changed. This affected one resident (#99) of three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including charcot's joint left ankle and foot and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #99 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making. Review of Resident #99's Census revealed the following room moves: a. On 02/06/24, admitted to room [ROOM NUMBER]-A. b. On 02/07/24, moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]-A. c. On 02/23/24, moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B. d. On 09/05/24, moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence that Resident #99 was provided written notification including the reason for the change on 02/07/24 or 02/23/24. On 09/11/24 at 11:01 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals as needed. This affected one resident (#37) of four residents sampled. The census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate intellectual disability, acute respiratory failure, pressure ulcers and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Nursing Admission/re-admission Assessment - V 4 dated 08/31/24 revealed Resident #37 required limited assistance with eating. Review of the Skin and Wound Note dated 09/05/24 revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) #908 assessed Resident #37 to have a Stage IV pressure ulcer to the coccyx, deep tissue injury to the left heel, right heel and left lateral foot. NP #908 indicated the resident had multiple factors that may impair wound healing including the risk of dehydration and malnutrition. Review of the dietitian Progress Notes dated 09/05/24 revealed Resident #37 was ordered a regular, puree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely develop and implement comprehensive, individualized and effective pressure ulcer care and treatment to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for Resident #37, who was admitted to the facility with multiple pressure ulcers present. This affected one resident (#37) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified eight residents with pressure ulcers. The census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate intellectual disability, schizoaffective disorder, multiple pressure ulcers and anxiety. The resident also had a history of osteomyelitis, peripheral venous insufficiency, and chronic embolism/thrombosis of left popliteal vein. Review of the hospital Discharge Summary (hospital stay prior to Resident #37's admission to the facility) dated 08/31/24 revealed a specialty hospital Wound Progress Note dated 08/27/24 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tanks were safely transported. This affected two residents (#57 and #89) observed with oxygen. The facility identified 13 residents utilized oxygen. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated September 2024 revealed continuous oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula (L/NC). On 09/03/24 at 11:52 A.M., observation revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #416 was in the lobby area across from the nurses' station and was assisting Resident #57. STNA #416 was observed removing the oxygen regulator from an empty oxygen tank, applied the regulator to a new oxygen tank, applied the nasal cannula set on Resident #57, placed the full oxygen tank into a wheeled oxygen carrier, wedged the carrier between the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement enteral feeding recommendations timely. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility identified 13 residents who received nothing by mouth. The census was 72. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, total colectomy, gastrostomy, acute kidney failure with tubular, hemodialysis and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, received nutrition 51% or more from a feeding tube, weighed 123 pounds and was 71 inches tall. Review of the discharge MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident weighed 100 pounds and received nutrition 51% or more from a feeding tube. On 08/14/24, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen per physician orders. This affected one resident (#57). The facility identified 13 residents that were ordered to receive oxygen. The census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated September 2024 revealed continuous oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula (L/NC). a. On 09/03/24 at 11:52 A.M., observation revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #416 was in the lobby area across from the nurses' station and was assisting Resident #57. STNA #416 was observed removing the oxygen regulator from an empty oxygen tank, applied the regulator to a new oxygen tank, applied the nasal cannula set on Resident #57 and set the oxygen level to be administered to the resident. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected three residents (#2, #28, and #37) of five sampled residents. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate intellectual disability, acute respiratory failure and wounds. Review of the specialty hospital Wound Progress Notes dated 08/27/24 revealed Resident #37 had a left heel/calcaneus deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI). The wound measured 0.2 centimeters (cm) in length (l) by 1.8 (cm) in width (w). There was no depth documented. Review of the Nursing Admission/re-admission Assessment - V 4 dated 08/31/24 revealed Resident #37 had the following skin impairments: a. Left inner ankle pressure ulcer measuring 1.0 (cm) in (l) by 0.3 (cm) in (w) by zero depth(d). No stage was documented. b. Right heel pressure ulcer measuring 2.0 (cm) in (l) by 1.5 (cm) in (w) by zero (d). No stage was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection protocols were implemented when facility staff failed to ensure gloving and hand washing was completed during incontinence care and indwelling catheter supplies were maintained off the floor. This affected two residents (#28, #37). The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate intellectual disability, schizoaffective disorder, multiple pressure ulcers and anxiety. On 09/11/24 between 10:09 A.M. and 10:31 A.M., observation of Resident #37's sacrum pressure ulcer treatment revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #412, Registered Nurse (RN) #401 and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #306 positioned the resident and removed the incontinence product. The incontinence product was saturated with dark yellow urine and pasty, dried stool was observed on the buttocks and around the wound edges. There was no dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy for wound care, this facility failed to ensure residents assessments were accurate to refect a pre-existing skin injury during admission assessments. This affected one (Resident #141) of four residents reviewed for skin care and prevention. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #141 revealed an initial admission date of 07/23/23, and re-entry date of 11/29/23, and a discharge date of 12/13/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, and sepsis unspecified organism. Review of the plan of care dated 11/30/23 revealed Resident #141 was at risk for skin breakdown and has skin breakdown. Interventions include to apply triad cream twice a day after incontinence episode as needed, assist with repositioning and or turning at frequent intervals to provide pressure relief, keep skin clean and dry, assist with skin care based on residents limitations, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents receiving antibiotics were monitored for effectiveness including obtaining and monitoring vital signs. This affected one (Resident #141) of the four residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #141 revealed an initial admission date of 07/23/23, and re-entry date of 11/29/23, and a discharge date of 12/13/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, and sepsis unspecified organism. Review of Resident #141's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #141 required supervision assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, and transfers. Resident #141 was noted to be receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy for medication administration, this facility failed to ensure residents thyroid medication was administered at the scheduled time. This affected one (Resident #41) of the four residents reviewed for accurate medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 04/13/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following an cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, diabetes insipidus, anxiety disorder, obesity, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident required supervision or set up assistance for eating, oral care, toilet hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene. Noted to have an indwelling catheter and always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy for charting and documentation, this facility failed to ensure information documented in residents medical records were accurate to reflect care provided. This affected one (Resident #41) of four residents reviewed for accurate medical record documentation. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 04/13/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following an cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, diabetes insipidus, anxiety disorder, obesity, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident required supervision or set up assistance for eating, oral care, toilet hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene. Noted to have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 11/14/21. Medical diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (09/15/22), bipolar disorder (07/18/21), obsessive-compulsive disorder (07/18/21), anxiety disorder (07/18/21), major depressive disorder (07/18/21), and mild intellectual disabilities (07/18/21). Review of the annual MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 07/15/23, revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #5 required extensive assistance from two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #5's PASRR, dated 01/28/22, revealed the document did not include Resident #5's diagnosis of anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. The document also did not include Resident #5's use of anti-anxiety medication. Interview on 08/16/23 at 4:41 P.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #210 confirmed an updated PASRR had not been completed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected three (Residents #5, #13, and #30) of three residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #13's diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, obsessive compulsive disorder (12/27/16), osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder (03/09/13), anxiety disorder (03/09/13), unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (03/09/13). Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/14/23, revealed she had mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #13's PASRR document, dated 02/15/12, revealed under Section D, the only diagnosis listed was mood disorder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect changes in advanced directives. This affected one (Resident #7) out of 18 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/27/23, revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Resident #7 was receiving hospice care. Review of the physician orders for Resident #7 revealed an order dated 06/09/23 for Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care - Arrest (DNR-CC-Arrest). Review of the paper chart for Resident #7 revealed the first page was a label in bold print which indicated DNR-CC-Arrest. Review of the care plan for Resident #7 revealed a problem that outlined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary recommendations to address weight loss were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #64) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 07/14/23. Resident #64's medical diagnoses included fracture of right femur (lower leg bone), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), Type II Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels), dementia without behavioral disturbance, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/21/23, revealed Resident #64 had impaired cognition and scored a six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #64 required supervision from one staff with eating. Review of the care plan, dated 07/18/23, revealed Resident #64 had a potential to be at nutritional risk. Interventions included to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the physician ordered parameters. This affected two residents (Resident #30 and Resident #34) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to metabolic neuropathy, polyneuropathy, low back pain, chronic pain, depression, rhabdomyolysis, thrombocytopenia, and edema. Review of Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/16/23, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed an order, dated 04/20/23, for Norco (narcotic medication) oral tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg), give one tablet every six hours as needed for a pain level of six to 10 out of 10, not to exceed three grams (gm) in 24 hours.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices including proper procedures for residents in droplet isolation and/or quarantine to prevent the spread of infection including COVID-19. This affected five residents (#37, #212, #311, #312 and #313) and had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #311 revealed an admission date of 07/02/21 with diagnoses including sepsis due to Escherichia coli (E-coli), lobar pneumonia and droplet precautions due to new admission COVID-19 quarantine. On 07/12/21 at 9:30 A.M. Maintenance Director #16 was observed standing in Resident #311's room assisting the resident with her television. Maintenance Director #16 was observed wearing only a surgical mask. On Resident #311's door prior to entering the room was a sign indicating to wear a gown, gloves, N-95 mask and goggles prior to entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed ensure comprehensive and individualized care plans were developed for all residents. This affected four residents (#7, #25, #32 and #47) of 21 sampled residents who care plans were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed a re-admission to the facility on [DATE] and latest re-admission of 05/09/21. The resident had diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, anemia, urine retention, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, severe morbid obesity, repeated fall, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Review of the resident's admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was incontinent of urine one or more times a shift and incontinent of bowel. Review of the resident's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/16/21 revealed the resident had clear speech,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to promote Resident #311's dignity when staff failed to ensure the resident's urinary drainage collection bag was covered and not visible to other residents/staff/visitors. This affected one resident (#311) of one resident reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #311 revealed an admission date of 07/02/21 with diagnosis including severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, and acute kidney failure with an artificial opening of the urinary tract. Review of Resident #311's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/09/21 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident had a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #311 required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene and was totally dependent on one staff member for toilet use. Resident #311 was noted to require the use of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #19 experienced a significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#19) of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/11/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, dysphagia and adult failure to thrive. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed 12/23/20 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognitive status. The MDS revealed the resident was 69 inches tall, required supervision with eating and had experienced weight loss. Review of weight records revealed the resident weighed 149.8 pounds on admission on [DATE]. On 12/29/20 the resident weighed 133.6 pounds. A progress note by the dietician on 12/31/20 indicated the resident's weight had been stable for seven days. Meal intakes were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with personal privacy. This affected three residents (#5, #19 and #212) of three residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/11/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure and adult failure to thrive. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 04/08/21 indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills and required extensive assistance from two staff with transfers and walking. On 07/13/21 at 8:37 A.M. the surveyor was conducting an interview with Resident #19. Resident #19 was in bed and the room door was closed. At that time, Housekeeping Aide #13 opened the door to Resident #19's room and entered without knocking first. She proceeded into the bathroom to place soap and then left the room. She did not speak to the resident or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to comprehensively assess Resident #25's behavior patterns. This affected one resident (#25) of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 12/19/19 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The resident was receiving an antidepressant medication daily and was receiving Hospice services. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 04/20/21 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. On 07/13/21 at 8:30 A.M., 1:20 P.M. and 2:40 P.M., on 07/14/21 at 8:58 A.M. and 12:25 P.M. and on 07/15/21 at 8:38 A.M. and 10:05 A.M. Resident #25 was observed in bed with his head covered up with a blanket. On 07/15/21 at 10:45 A.M. interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #35 revealed Resident #25 refuses to get out of bed most of the time and always has his head under the covers. RN #35 revealed she did not know why he always kept his head covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, interview interview and policy review this facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate to reflect each residents specific care needs. This affected one resident (#32) of 21 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/25/18 with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia without behavioral disturbances and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #32's compressive Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident with a moderately impaired cognition for decision making abilities. Resident #32 was noted to reject care. Resident #32 required supervision from one staff member for bed mobility and bathing and required limited assistance from one staff member for transfers, ambulation, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #32 was assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly evident serious mental disorder to the appropriate State-designated authority for a Preadmission and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II assessment/determination upon change in status. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/24/19. Record review revealed PASRR results, effective 09/24/19 which indicated the resident had no indications of serious mental illness. Therefore, a PASRR Level II review was not warranted/completed. Further record review revealed the resident was admitted for an inpatient psychiatric stay from 03/25/20 to 04/09/20. A physician's progress note on 04/13/20 revealed the resident was recently back after a psychiatric hospitalization. Per staff he had been yelling, shouting and threatening staff and other residents. A diagnosis of schizophrenia with antipsychotic use was noted in the progress notes. A diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #59's baseline plan of care addressed the resident's bruising and skin tears. This affected one resident (#59) of 21 sampled residents who care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an original admission date of 06/16/21 with the latest readmission of 07/11/21. The resident had diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, left hip pressure ulcer, pressure ulcer of sacral region, abdominal aortic aneurysm, presence of artificial hip joint bilaterally, dysphagia and fall. Review of the resident's readmission assessment, dated 07/11/21 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer to his left hip measuring 18.0 centimeters (cm) in length by 9.0 cm width with no stage specified, a pressure ulcer to right heel measuring 1.0 cm by 1.5 cm with no stage specified. The resident also had a scab to the back of his right hand measuring 1.0 cm by 0.7 cm and the back of his left hand measuring 1.7 cm by 0.2 cm. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility to revise Resident #47's plan of care to reflect the resident's incontinence of bladder. This affected one resident (#47) of 21 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed a re-admission to the facility on [DATE] with a latest re-admission of 05/09/21. The resident had diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, anemia, urine retention, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, severe morbid obesity, repeated fall, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Review of the resident's admission assessment, dated 03/31/21 indicated the resident was incontinent of urine one or more times a shift and incontinent of bowel. Review of the plan of care, dated 04/27/21 revealed the resident was incontinent of bladder. Interventions included notify nursing if resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #47, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living received timely and adequate personal care/shaving assistance to maintain good hygiene. This affected two residents (#5 and #47) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an original admission date of 09/20/16 with the latest readmission of 03/17/21 and admitting diagnoses of encephalopathy, malaise, contracture of right hand, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with right sided hemiplegia, dysphagia, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, overactive bladder, aphasia and hypertension. Review of the plan of care, dated 12/11/19 revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to CVA,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement individualized and meaningful activities to meet the total care needs of Resident #11 and Resident #53. This affected two residents (#11 and #53) of three residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/06/21 with diagnosis including adult failure to thrive, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, deep tissue damage of the left heel and pressure ulcer of the right heel. Review of Resident #53's Activity Assessment/Evaluation, dated 06/07/21 revealed the resident's current interests included arts/crafts, sports, music, spiritual/religious activities, walking/wheeling outdoors, watching television, watching movies, talking/conversing, listening to the radio, and groups and organizations. Resident #53 did not take naps throughout the day. Review of the plan of care, dated 06/07/21 revealed Resident #53 had impaired cognitive and thought processes related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to assess and monitor Resident #59 related to bruising and skin tears. This affected one resident (#59) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an original admission date of 06/16/21 with the latest readmission of 07/11/21 and diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, left hip pressure ulcer, pressure ulcer of sacral region, abdominal aortic aneurysm, presence of artificial hip joint bilaterally, dysphagia and fall. Review of the resident's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/23/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, usually understood others, made himself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and was non-ambulatory. The assessment indicated the resident had skin tears. Review of the resident's readmission assessment, dated 07/11/21 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 received proper treatment to maintain vision and hearing abilities. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for communication. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/24/19. Review of a psychiatric progress note, dated 06/14/21 revealed the clinician documented the resident was seen for psychiatric medication management. The resident was seen for anxiety and mood swings. The clinician documented the resident was extremely hard of hearing making the exam difficult. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/30/21 revealed the resident had moderate difficulty with hearing and had no hearing aids. The MDS also revealed the resident had moderately impaired vision and had no glasses On 07/14/21 at 9:30 A.M. the surveyor attempted to speak to the resident. The resident was noted to be extremely hard of hearing. Interview with Registered Nurse #35 on 07/15/21 at 10:00 A.M. confirmed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to adequately and comprehensively assess pressure ulcers for Resident #47 and Resident #59 upon admission and/or re-admission to the facility. This affected two residents (#47 and #59) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a latest re-admission of 05/09/21 with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, anemia, urine retention, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, severe morbid obesity, repeated fall, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Review of the resident's admission assessment, dated 03/31/21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a SDTI to the right heel measuring 7.8 centimeters (cm) in length by 8.0 cm width. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards related to smoking. This affected one resident (#34) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: The facility identified two residents who smoked cigarettes, Residents #34 and #162. The facility identified smoking times for residents were at 7:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M., 3:00 P.M., 7:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. each day. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 11/08/20 with diagnoses including diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and right above the knee amputation. Review of a plan of care, revised on 03/18/21 revealed Resident #34 was a smoker. The goal was for the resident not to sustain harm or injury related to unsafe smoking practices. Interventions included to assess for changes in mental status that would effect his ability to smoke safely, educate resident on smoking policies, monitor for burn holes in clothing, burn marks, etc., monitor for instances of non…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to implement timely and effective interventions to ensure Resident #19 maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/11/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, dysphagia and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/23/20 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognitive status. The MDS revealed the resident was 69 inches tall, required supervision with eating and had experienced weight loss. Review of the weight records revealed the resident weighed 149.8 pounds on admission on [DATE]. On 12/14/20 the resident weighed 132.2 pounds (a weight loss of 17.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized plan for Resident #11, who had a diagnosis of dementia to ensure the resident received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (#11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 12/04/20 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder. The resident was currently receiving an antianxiety medication, Buspar three times daily. The anti-anxiety medication had been started on 12/14/20 and then increased on 12/21/20 and 04/28/21. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/11/20 indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition and had physically inappropriate behaviors and socially inappropriate behaviors. A quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment on 07/02/21 indicated the resident had physically and verbally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations for Resident #7 and Resident #38 were addressed timely by the physician. This affected two residents (#7 and #38) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an original admission date of 01/08/18 with the latest readmission of 11/08/19 and admitting diagnoses of cirrhosis of liver, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, cerebrovascular disease, dementia encephalopathy, convulsions, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, insomnia and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of a pharmacy recommendation, dated 03/08/21 revealed the pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for the resident related to an order for Trazadone. The physician failed to address the recommendation until 05/10/21 at which time the physician agreed with the recommendation and reduced the medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were administered only when necessary and with adequate and appropriate monitoring including laboratory testing to monitor for effectiveness and optimal dose. This affected two residents (#7 and #38) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an original admission date of 01/08/18 with the latest readmission of 11/08/19 and admitting diagnoses of cirrhosis of liver, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, cerebrovascular disease, dementia encephalopathy, convulsions, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, insomnia and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed the resident was on anticoagulant therapy related to atrial fibrillation. Interventions included to administer medication as ordered, monitor as ordered by physician, labs as ordered, report abnormal lab results to physician,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement behavioral interventions, including non pharmacological approaches prior to administering psychoactive medications and failed to timely evaluate the effectiveness of psychoactive medications for Resident #11. This affected one (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 12/04/20 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. Record review revealed the resident was currently receiving the antianxiety medication, Buspar 15 milligrams (mg) three times daily. The antianxiety medication had been started on 12/14/20 at 10 milligrams twice daily and then increased on 12/21/20 to 10 milligrams three times daily and then on 04/28/21 was increased to 15 milligrams three times daily. A nursing progress note, dated 12/14/20 at 2:44 P.M. revealed the nurse practitioner was in and updated on resident with increased anxiety. New orders for Buspar and Vistaril.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory testing was completed as ordered and/or failed to ensure the physician was promptly notified of resident laboratory results which fell outside the clinical reference ranges. This affected two residents (#5 and #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/24/19. a. The resident had physician's orders dated 12/29/20 for the medication Depakote (valproic acid) 125 milligrams three times a day for schizoaffective disorder and Lipitor 80 milligrams daily for hyperlipidemia (high lipids in the blood). The resident had a physician's order, dated 02/25/21 for a lipid panel and valproic acid level to be drawn every six months. A lipid panel is a blood test that measures lipids such as triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). A valproic acid level measures the amount of valproic acid medication in the blood stream. Review of laboratory test results, dated 03/05/21 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLINT RIDGE NURSING HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2019 |
| CHOMESH 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/03/2023 |
| STARLIGHT HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/03/2023 |
| WOLMARK, RACHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/03/2023 |
| WOLMARK, YEHUDA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/03/2023 |
| ICKES, ANDREW | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/07/2022 |
| STERN, JACOB | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365485. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.