Sunrise Nursing Healthcare LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 70.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the right to privacy and confidential medical records for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #59) of 67 facility residents. Specifically, observations revealed the computer screen on two medications carts was left visible in a facility hallway, while Resident #45 and Resident #59's identification and personal health information (PHI) was displayed. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, revised 04/2017, indicated, Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. The policy revealed, 4. Access to resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff and business associates.On 08/25/2025 at 9:24 AM, an observation revealed a computer screen on top of a medication cart for the Peri/Primrose Hallway displayed Resident #45's PHI, including the resident's name, contact information, a list of medications and allergies, and progress notes. The nurse was in the room with a resident behind a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff smoked only in designated areas of the facility in accordance with the facilities smoking policy. This affected one (Resident #58) of three reviewed for oxygen usage. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 09/22/23 with diagnoses of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, anoxic brain damage, metabolic encephalopathy and tracheostomy. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had severe cognitive impairment and had range of motion impairment of bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #58 was non-communicative and dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders for July 2024 revealed Resident #58 had a tracheostomy with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired tube feed formula bottles stored in the medication rooms and central supply room. The facility identified one resident (#26) who received Glucerna 1.5 (a specialized tube feed formula) and no residents currently who received Nephro 1.8 (a specialized tube feed formula). The facility identified 11 residents who receive tube feed formula. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation of medication room B with Registered Nurse (RN) #206 on [DATE] at 11:15 A.M. verified there were eight bottles of expired Glucerna 1.5 in the medication room. The eight bottles had expiration date of [DATE]. Subsequent observations of the central supply room with RN #206 verified there were eight bottles Glucerna 1.5 with the expiration date of [DATE]. RN #206 verified there were a total of 16 bottles of Glucerna 1.5 bottles with expired date [DATE] in medication room B and central supply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0694 — pattern
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, staff interview, and interview with contracted entity provider representative, the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected two additional current Residents (#03 and #19) and 16 discharged Residents (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, and #22) for total of 22 residents. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 11/18/19. Diagnoses included Parkinsonism,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, staff interview and contracted entity provider representative interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected two additional current Residents (#03 and #19) and 16 discharged Residents (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, and #22) for total of 22 residents. The census was 46. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0837 — pattern
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected two additional current Residents (#03 and #19) and 16 discharged Residents (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, and #22) for total of 22 residents. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 11/18/19. Diagnoses included Parkinsonism, dementia, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #01, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely discard expired medications. This affected two (#195 and #15) residents with expired medications observed in the medication carts and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who could potentially receive expired stock medications. The census was 41. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/01/22 at 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #219 revealed the B Side medication room refrigerator contained two open vial of tuberculin testing solution dated upon opening with dates of 03/30/22 and 04/12/22. Interview on 06/01/22 at 9:15 A.M. with LPN #219 confirmed the TB test solution was expired and should have been discarded. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/08/16 with a diagnosis of glaucoma Review of the June 2022 monthly physician orders for Resident #40 revealed an order dated 02/08/21 for Brimonidine Tartrate Solution eye drops to left eye two times a day. Observation on 06/01/22 at 9:16…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, review of a meal spreadsheet and policy review, the facility failed to provide qualified staff to ensure meals were provided as ordered by the physician. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of lunch menu spreadsheet dated 06/01/22 revealed a puree diet was to have a #16 scoop portion of puree bread. There was no diet planned for mechanical soft diets. Observation on 06/01/22 from 11:00 A.M. to 11:15 A.M. , revealed [NAME] #228 preparing puree foods, and no puree bread was prepared. The 06/01/22 lunch spreadsheet was observed on the counter. [NAME] #228 did not review the spreadsheet when pureeing the food. Interview on 06/01/22 at 11:15 A.M. [NAME] #228 stated she did not normally made puree bread and did not know the amount of meat portion or foods to prepared for mechanical soft diets. [NAME] #228 stated she just received new spreadsheets from the Interim Dietary Manger #275 and had not been trained on the spreadsheets. [NAME] #228 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of a spreadsheet and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient and trained dietary staff to meet residents' dietary needs. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the dietary schedule revealed no dinner cook was scheduled on 05/31/22 and 06/01/22. Interview on 05/31/22 at 4:45 P.M. Housekeeper #231 revealed she was pulled to assist in the kitchen for the meal. Housekeeper #231 stated she had not worked in the kitchen for 10 years. Observation on 06/01/22 at 1:30 P.M. revealed the dishwasher washer was not meeting temperature standards and the Administrator instructed Dietary Aide #243 to clean and sanitize the dishes in the three-sink method. Interview on 06/01/22 at 3:30 P.M. with Dietary Aide #243 stated she was not going to clean the dishes by the three-sink method because she did not have enough time. Dietary Aide #243 stated there was no one else in the kitchen. Dietary Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, review of the dish machine log and policy review the facility failed to label foods, sanitize dishes and store ice machine scoop in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Observation on 05/31/22 at 8:45 A.M. revealed in the dry storage room, an undated bag of macaroni. In the refrigerator walk in, macaroni salad and two bags of chopped lettuce were undated. The lettuce appeared to be wet and had a brown colored appearance. In the reach in refrigerator, thawed meat was in an undated box. The ice machine scoop was directly on top of the ice machine, lying on the wet surface. The ice scoop holder was hanging onto the ice machine, attached on one side. The ice scoop had several cracked areas and had brown debris in the cracked areas. Interview on 05/31 at 8:50 A.M., Dietary Aide #202 verified the lettuce needed discarded and the macaroni salad was undated. Dietary Aide #202 verified the ice scoop holder had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $643K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH