No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook Care Center

8211 Weller Road, Cincinnati, OH 45242 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 146 certified beds · (513) 489-2444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 489-2444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10700 Montgomery Rd · (513) 793-2835 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Kroger1.2 mi
11390 Montgomery Rd · (513) 247-7760 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11349 Montgomery Rd · (513) 247-0018 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10530 Deerfield Rd · (513) 891-2424 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8100 Cornell Rd · (513) 489-3399

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.1%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine28.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.231.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.441.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 38.9–55.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.2–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.8–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.20
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 100.6 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility with the exception of for eight facility-identified (Residents#1, #8, #15, #20, #43, #67, #91, and #124) with orders for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation n 06/01/26 at 8:13 A.M. of the freezer next to the grill line revealed it included the following items which had ice crystals on them: two bags of chopped carrots, one bag of fish, two bags of raw chicken, one bag of raw pork, three bags of hot dogs, one bag of sausages, one bag of beef. Interview on 06/01/26 at 8:20 A.M. with [NAME] #392 verified the items in the freezer had ice crystals and appeared to have freezer burn. Interview on 06/01/26 at 8:24 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #384 verified the food in the freezer had ice crystals and appeared to have freezer burn and food with ice crystals should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified dining experience. This affected 13 (Residents #39, #79, #55, #20, #45, #31, #49, #17, #42, #32, #48, #71, and #102) with the potential to affect all of the residents except eight residents with orders for nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 107 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 09/23/10 with diagnoses including type one diabetes mellitus and anorexia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #71 dated 04/08/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required set up or clean up assistance with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 08/10/18 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #105 dated 03/30/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required set up or clean up assistance with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, review of the dietary spreadsheet, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the menu for residents with orders for a pureed diet. This affected ten facility-identified (Residents (#9, #11, #17, #20, #26, #45, #60, #66, #112 and #122) with order for a pureed diet. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility menu dated 06/03/26 revealed lunch included chicken noodle casserole, carrot coins, assorted bread, and ambrosia salad.Review of the dietary spreadsheet revealed residents on a pureed diet should receive pureed bread when it was on the menu. Observation of the lunch service on 06/03/26 revealed residents with pureed diets were not being served bread. Interview on 06/03/26 at 11:58 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #384 verified residents with a pureed diet were not being served bread. DM #384 stated the pureed bread didn't taste good, and she thought that the residents were getting enough carbohydrates from the noodles in the casserole. DM #384 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility diet listing, review of the facility menu, review of the facility spreadsheet, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with an order altered textured diets were served foods in a form that was safe and appropriate. This affected 35 facility-identified with orders for diets with altered textures. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: Review of the diet listing revealed the following residents had orders for a mechanical soft textured diet: Residents #3, #16, #17, #21, #25, #35, #38, #39, #46, #49, #51, #59, #65, #71, #73, #75, #77, #80, #83, #89, #90, #101, #102, #104, #106 The following residents had orders for a pureed diet: Residents #9, #17, #20, #26, #11, #45, #60, #66, #112, #122. Review of the facility menu for 06/03/26 revealed lunch included chicken noodle casserole, carrot coins, assorted bread, and ambrosia salad. Review of the dietary spread sheet revealed residents with an order for mechanical soft diets should receive extra gravy on the chicken noodle casserole and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #97) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 107 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed admission date of 12/26/22 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, Alzheimer's disease, and mixed incontinence. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #97 revealed an order dated 12/26/22 for moisture barrier apply topically to the peri area after each incontinent episode and as needed. Certified Nursing Assistant may apply.Review of the care plan for Resident #97 dated 01/05/23 revealed the resident was at increased risk for skin breakdown related to moisture exposure with interventions including following facility policies/protocols for prevention/treatment of skin break down. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #97 dated 03/06/26 for revealed the resident required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #116) of three closed resident records sampled. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed admission date of 03/10/25 with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus type two. Review of physician's orders for Resident #116 revealed order dated 03/11/25 for morphine sulfate 15 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for five days with a start date on 03/11/25 and an end date of 03/16/25. Review of narcotic sign out sheet for Resident #116's morphine sulfate revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #294 signed out administration of two doses of morphine sulfate on 03/17/25 and 03/19/25. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #116 dated March 2025 revealed it did not include documentation of morphine sulfate administration for the resident on 03/17/25 or on 03/19/25. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents. This affected one (Resident #97) of five residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 107 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 12/26/22 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #97 dated 03/06/26 revealed the resident was and required substantial staff assistance with toileting hygiene. Observation on 06/03/26 at 10:34 A.M. of Resident #97's room revealed there was a pair of balled up clinical gloves on floor near the bedroom door. Interview on 06/03/26 at 10:55 A.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #282 confirmed there was a pair of balled up clinical gloves on Resident #97's bedroom floor . Observation on 06/03/26 at 10:58 A.M. of Resident #97's room revealed there was a personal fan covered with dust build-up in the bedroom and there were two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility to properly store, label and date food, failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures, failed to dry dishes in sanitary manner, failed to ensure staff prepared food in a clean and sanitary manner, and failed to ensure staff wore beard restraints during food preparation. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation 05/05/25 at 8:50 A.M. of the free-standing refrigerator revealed the following contents: an open undated jar of grape jelly, unlabeled and undated pitchers of orange drink, lemonade and red punch. Interview on 05/05/25 at 8:50 A.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the jar of jelly and the pitchers of drinks were unlabeled and undated. 2. Observation on 05/05/25 at 8:54 A.M of the walk-in refrigerator revealed temperature logs posted on the front of the refrigerator had not been completed. The refrigerator contained the following: an open and undated carton of a thickened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to the washers were maintained in a clean manner and free of leaks. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/08/25 at 9:21 A.M. of the facility's laundry room revealed there were four washers that had brown, blue and white build-up on the top and along the sides of the washers. Further observation of the laundry room revealed water was coming out of the water reserve tank behind the washers which had run onto the floor in front of the washers. Interview on 05/08/25 at 9:21 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #900 confirmed there a brown, blue and white build- up on the top and along the sides of the washers. HS #900 confirmed water was coming out of the water reserve tank behind the washers and the water had run on the floor in front of the washers. HS #900 stated that the water on the floor was from the water reserve tank overflowing, and the water reserve tank had been overflowing for over a week onto the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to document and follow up on resident concerns brought up in the Resident Council meetings. This affected 10 (Residents #12, #15, #33, #36, #40, #46, #51, #63, #72, #78) of 10 residents who regularly attended the Resident Council meetings. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the monthly Resident Council meeting minutes dated May 2024 to April 2025 revealed the facility did not follow up on concerns raised in Resident Council meetings. The section of the minutes titled Old Business was left blank and did not include follow up on previous concerns brought by residents which include agency staffing, call lights, medications, laundry, and menus. Interview on 05/07/25 at 10:06 AM with Resident #200 confirmed she was the president of the Resident Council, and the facility had not provided follow up to the group on concerns brought up during the meetings. Interview on 05/07/25 at 10:07 A.M. with Resident #51 confirmed the facility had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Observation on 05/07/25 at 10:11 A.M. of the C Hall shower room with LPN #146 revealed there was an area measuring approximately two inches by three inches of brown skid marks of an unidentified substance on the wall by the toilet. Further observation revealed the walls surrounding the entire shower area contained a layer of a brown unidentifiable material where the wall met the floor, measuring approximately two inches up the wall. Interview on 05/07/25 with LPN #146 confirmed the brown skid marks on the wall by the toilet and the brown substance on the walls surrounding the shower and all of the C Hall residents had access to the shower room. This violation represents noncompliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00165072 and Complaint Number OH00164179 and Complaint Number OH00161596 and Complaint Number OH00161253 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate lighting in resident rooms. This affected one (Resident #21) of 16 residents reviewed for adequate lighting. The facility also failed to ensure a clean environment. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed and admission date of 12/15/22 with diagnoses including diabetes, schizoaffective disorder and chronic kidney disease. Resident #10 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 12/13/24 and returned to the facility. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #10 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for ADLs. Interview on 05/06/25 at 2:25 P.M. with Regional Operations Manager (ROM) #501 confirmed the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Resident #10's representative for the resident's hospitalization from 11/14/24 to 12/13/24. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #06 revealed an admission date of 12/30/21 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, cardiomegaly, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #06 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #06 dated 03/21/25, revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to serve food portions as planned by the Registered Dietitian (RD). This affected six (Residents #9, #13, #21, #30, #38, #65) of six residents with orders for a pureed diet. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Residents #9, #13, #21, #30, #38 and #65 revealed the residents had physician's orders to receive a pureed diet. Observation of lunch being served on 05/07/25 at 11:27 A.M. revealed [NAME] #188 served pureed portions of barbeque ham sandwiches and pureed potatoes for Residents #9, #13, #21, #30, #38, and #65. [NAME] #18 used a four-ounce scoop to plate the pureed barbeque ham sandwiches and a three-ounce scoop for the potatoes. Further observation revealed there was a poster in the kitchen which explained coded measurement indicators on utensils for reference when portioning food. Review of the dietary spreadsheet for lunch on 05/07/25 revealed the barbeque ham sandwich portion should be five and one-half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident physicians/medical providers of significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #45) of eight residents reviewed for weight changes. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 08/26/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), panic disorder, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #45 revealed an order dated 10/07/24 for daily weights. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #45 dated 03/05/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the weight record for Resident #45 revealed the following weights: 187 pounds on 12/04/24, 169 pounds on 12/05/24, 169.5 pounds on 12/06/24. Interview on 05/08/35 at 2:17 PM with Dietician #504 confirmed staff did not notify Nurse Practitioner (NP) #510 of Resident #45's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 8/11/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #43 dated 3/12/25 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and received insulin. Observation on 05/05/25 at 11:27 A.M. revealed Resident #43 was seated in the dining room with multiple residents who were waiting for lunch to be served. Registered Nurse (RN) #152 approached Resident #43 and told her she was going to check her blood sugar. RN #152 did not obtain consent from the resident. RN #152 then cleansed Resident #43's finger and pierced it with a lancet to obtain a blood sample to perform a blood sugar check. Interview on 05/05/25 at 11:35 A.M. with RN #152 confirmed she checked Resident #43's blood sugar in the dining room in the presence of other residents and did not provide visual privacy during treatment for the resident. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00162453. 2. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hypnotic medications were used with adequate indications for administration and with adequate monitoring. This affected one (Resident #75) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 10/29/24 with diagnoses including dysphagia, generalized anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #75 revealed an order dated 01/08/25 for Ambien five milligrams (mg) one table per mouth at bedtime for sleep assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #75 dated 02/04/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and received a hypnotic medication during the review period. Review of the care plan for Resident #75 last updated on 02/19/25 revealed the care plan did not address the use of Ambien, a hypnotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments regarding resident dental status and range of motion and mobility. This affected three (Residents #19, #75 and #80) of 21 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 03/22/25 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 03/26/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was not coded as edentulous (having no natural teeth.) Observation on 05/05/25 at 11:35 A.M. of Resident #19 revealed the resident was edentulous. Interview on 05/05/25 at 11:36 A.M with Resident #19 confirmed he was edentulous and had been so upon admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed within 30 days of being admitted to the facility with a hospital exemption. This affected one (Resident #19) of four residents reviewed for PASARR completion. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 03/22/25 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 03/26/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the hospital exemption from preadmission screening notification for Resident #19 dated 03/22/25 revealed the resident had a mental disability that was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview facility failed to revise Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments after a change in resident condition. This affected one (Resident #58) of four residents reviewed for PASARR completion. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 03/08/22 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurocognitive disorder, and diabetes. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #58 revealed an order dated on 09/11/24 for the resident to begin receiving hospice services. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #58 dated 02/28/25 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Interview on 05/08/25 at 9:20 A.M. with Social Worker (SW) #205 on 05/08/25 confirmed the facility should have completed an updated PASARR for Resident #58 when the resident was enrolled in hospice on 09/11/24, but the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop comprehensive resident care plans. This affected two (Residents #19 and #75) of 21 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 10/29/24 with diagnoses including dysphagia, generalized anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #75 revealed an order dated 01/08/25 for Ambien five milligrams (mg) one table per mouth at bedtime for sleep assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #75 dated 02/04/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and received a hypnotic medication during the review period. Review of the care plan for Resident #75 last updated on 02/19/25 revealed the care plan did not address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected three (Residents #10, #24, and #81) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/25/22 with diagnoses including dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and diabetes mellitus type two. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care conference records for Resident #10 revealed the revealed the facility did not conduct a quarterly care conference for Resident #10 for the first, second, and third quarters of 2024. The only documented quarterly care conference for Resident #10 was on 10/03/24. Interview on 05/08/25 at 11:52 A.M. with the Social Services Director (SSD) #205 confirmed care conferences were to be conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to reassess resident nutritional status following hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for readmission. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81 dated 03/26/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required minimal staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the May 2025 monthly physician's orders for Resident #81 revealed orders for the resident to have low concentrated sugar renal diet with a fluid restriction of 2000 milliliters (ml) per day. Review of hospital records for Resident #81 dated 03/31/25 to 04/11/25 revealed the resident was hospitalized for volume overload and had 44 pounds of fluid removed during the stay hospitalization. Resident #81's hospital admission weight was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 03/22/25 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, benign prostatic hyperplasia glaucoma, chronic kidney disease, and intellectual disabilities. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #19 dated 03/26/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required supervision with ADLS, and was admitted with two stage III pressure ulcers and one unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the care plan for Resident #19 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers related to the disease process, decreased mobility and moisture exposure. Interventions included staff to administer treatments as ordered and monitor for the effectiveness and to follow facility protocols for the prevention of and treatment of skin breakdown. Review of the wound assessment for Resident #19 dated 04/02/25 per WNP #502 revealed upon admission the resident had the following three pressure ulcers: a stage three pressure ulcer to the left buttock which measured 3.5 centimeters (cm) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff administered resident tube feedings in a sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #75) of one residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 10/29/24 with dysphagia following cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, and gastrostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #75 dated 02/04/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a gastrostomy tube. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #75 revealed an order dated 10/24/24 for an enteral feeding two times a day of Jevity 1.5 to be administered via pump at 70 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour 8:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Review of the care plan for Resident #75 dated 11/11/24 revealed the resident required tube feedings related to dysphagia. Interventions included the following: elevate the head of the bed 45 degrees during and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, review of a medication error report, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #200) of one resident reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 01/17/25 with diagnoses including chronic diastolic heart failure, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease The resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set MDS assessment for Resident #200 dated 01/23/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.)Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and consulting pharmacist interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were properly labeled and stored. This affected three (Residents #65, #39 and #34) of 21 facility- identified residents who received insulin. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 02/18/25 with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #65 dated 03/25/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #65 revealed an order dated 02/18/25 for the resident to receive insulin lispro per sliding scale. Observation on 05/06/25 at 10:46 A.M. of the A-nursing unit front medication cart revealed the cart contained two insulin lispro pens for Resident #65 that were not dated. Interview on 05/06/25 at 10:46 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #260 confirmed the two insulin lispro pens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide specified foods for residents with physician's orders to be on a renal diet. This affected one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for specialized diets. The facility total census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dialysis, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81 dated 03/26/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required minimal staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of physician's orders for Resident #81 revealed the resident was ordered a renal diet with low concentrated sugar and had a fluid restriction of 2000 milliliters (ml) per day. Review of the breakfast meal ticket for Resident #81 dated 05/07/25 revealed the resident was to receive six ounces of apple or cranberry juice and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 02/22/25 with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis,COPD, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #18 dated 03/06/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with ADLs. Observation on 05/06/25 at 10:59 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #882 was wearing gloves and entered Resident #18's room Observation on 05/06/25 at 11:00 A.M revealed CNA #882 exited Resident #18's room still wearing gloves and assisted the resident to the dining room. Interview on 05/06/25 at 11:02 AM with CNA #882 confirmed she entered Resident #18's room and she was wearing gloves. CNA #882 confirmed she assisted Resident #18 to the dining room and she was still wearing the same gloves that she was wearing upon entry to the resident's room. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00165072 and Complaint Number OH00162543. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a residents and/or resident representative received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza immunization. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/25/22 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician order's orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated 10/24/24 for the resident to receive the influenza vaccine. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #10 dated October 2024 revealed on 10/24/24 the resident was documented as having refused the influenza vaccine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/25/22 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the immunization record for Resident #10 revealed the resident received a COVID-19 booster vaccine on 06/09/22 prior to admission to the facility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 04/01/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the medical record for Resident #10 from 01/01/24 to 05/08/25 revealed the resident did not have a COVID-19 vaccine consent or declination form in his chart.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure their policy regarding abuse was implemented when facility staff found a male and female resident in a bed together. This affected one (#4) of the two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, depression and hypertension. Resident #4 resided on the secured memory care unit. Resident #4 had been deemed incompetent. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition, no range of motion impairment of upper and lower extremities and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, bed mobility and transfers, moderate assistance for oral and personal hygiene, toileting and dressing and maximal assistance for bathing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an an alleged incident of abuse. This affected one (#4) of the two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, depression and hypertension. Resident #4 resided on the secured memory care unit. Resident #4 had been deemed incompetent. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition, no range of motion impairment of upper and lower extremities and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, bed mobility and transfers, moderate assistance for oral and personal hygiene, toileting and dressing and maximal assistance for bathing. Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing high-contact care to residents in Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP). This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, type II diabetes, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the care plan dated 04/26/2024 revealed Resident #46 had Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) secondary to increased risk for potential infection related to Candida Auris. Interventions included educating residents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to call lights. This affected one (Resident #46) of five residents sampled for call lights. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, type II diabetes, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of care plan dated 11/22/2022 revealed Resident #46 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to disease process and required staff assistance to complete ADL tasks. Interventions included encourage the resident to utilize the call light for assistance as needed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care as ordered. This affected one (Resident #41) of one resident of two reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included ataxic cerebral palsy, idiopathic gout, morbid obesity, type II diabetes, chronic diastolic heart failure, unspecified Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the care plan dated 06/27/2023 revealed Resident #41 was at increased risk for pressure ulcer development related to disease process. Interventions included, administer medications as ordered, administer treatments as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received pain medications timely. This affected one (Resident #75) of six residents sampled for medication administration. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic ischemic heart disease, vitamin chronic pain disease, depression, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, pain in right hip, pain in right shoulder, anxiety disorder, and dermatitis. Resident #75 had no recorded diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease or any other form of dementia. Review of Resident #75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of care plan dated 03/24/2024 revealed Resident #75 had chronic pain related to arthritis and depression. Interventions included to administer analgesia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered and to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This affected two (Residents #41 and #51) of six residents sampled for medication administration. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included ataxic cerebral palsy, idiopathic gout, morbid obesity, type II diabetes, chronic diastolic heart failure, unspecified Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 had physician orders for Cymbalta Delayed Release (antidepressant) 20 mg capsule by mouth once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a pressure ulcer dressing change was completed per physician orders. This affected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four pressure ulcers in the facility. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/14/23. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder, peripheral vascular disease, depression, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/21/24, revealed Resident #93 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #93 required set-up and clean-up assistance for eating, partial/moderate assistance for toileting, and supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility. Additionally, Resident #93 was coded for a stage four pressure ulcer to her sacrum and had a colostomy. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #93 had a pressure ulcer to her sacrum related to immobility. Interventions included to document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper colostomy care was provided. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for colostomy care. The facility identified three residents with colostomies. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/23. Diagnoses included chronic ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, anxiety, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/14/24, revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #77 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #77 was coded as having a colostomy. Review of the plan of care, dated 03/20/24, revealed Resident #77 required the use of a colostomy. Interventions included to provide ostomy care per order to prevent odors and keep the ostomy patent. Observation on 05/07/24 at 1:14 P.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician completed resident visits every 60 days. This affected two (#2 and #3) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 99. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 01/24/21. Diagnoses included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/30/24, revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #2's medical record from 12/01/23 through 05/07/24 revealed no evidence of a physician visit. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 01/13/23. Diagnoses included hypertension, dementia, hyperlipidemia, and traumatic brain injury. Review of quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/24/24, revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #3's medical record from 12/01/23 through 05/07/24 revealed no evidence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure they employed a qualified dietary manager. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Dietary Manager (DM) #105's employee file revealed DM #105 was hired on 04/07/23 and was not a certified diet manager or food service director in the state. The Director of Food Service Job Description, signed by the Diet Manger #105 and the Administrator on 04/07/23, revealed the diet manager must be a food service director in the state. Interview on 11/14/23 at 3:08 P.M. Dietary Manager #105 revealed the registered dietitian was part time, a diet technician visits two times a week, and there was no certified dietary manager at the facility. DM #105 verified she was not a certified dietary manager, had not enrolled in a certified dietary manager course or food service director program from the state. DM #105 stated she had no dietary manager orientation training. Interview on 11/14/23 at 3:08 P.M. with the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to store food, drink, and meal services items in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one (#1) resident who had orders for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 97. Findings Include: 1. Observation of the kitchen during tour on 11/13/23 from 8:45 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. revealed an unlabeled and undated three gallon pitcher of liquid, a container of sauerkraut dated 11/09/23, and an open container of whole milk with no date in the reach-in refrigerator; an open container of grape jelly with no open date and six bags of rolls with no open or expiration date on the food preparation counter; no thermometer inside the milk cooler; no thermometer in the ice cream freezer and no documentation ice cream freezer temperatures from October and November 2023; there were open containers and bags of french fried onions and pasta with no open dates, boxes of cream of wheat, oats, and rice with no received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected eight (Residents #36, #13, #58, #45, #86, #55, #30, and #78) of eight residents reviewed for environment. Additionally, this affected all residents residing on the Unit B Memory Care Unit (MCU). The census was 97. Findings included: 1. Observation of Resident #36's and Resident #13's room on 11/13/23 at 2:19 P.M. revealed the walls in the room had plaster on them that didn't match the paint, there were scuff marks on the sliding door that went into the bathroom, and the top of the vanity was scarred up and had ink of newspaper imbedded in the top of it. 2. Observation of Resident #58's and Resident #45's room on 11/14/23 at 7:18 A.M. revealed dry wall was missing from the sliding door that went into the bathroom. 3. Observation and interview 11/15/23 at 8:21 A.M. with Resident #86 revealed she was sitting in her room with a jacket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and review of pharmacy board website, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids per professional standards when they allowed a company who was not licensed in Ohio by the State Pharmacy Board to administer dangerous intravenous fluid medications to residents. This affected three (Resident #47, #78, and #87) of three reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility identified 22 (Residents #1, #3, #6, #11, #20, #23, #28, #35, #40, #46, #47, #52, #78, #85, #87, #92, #355, #356, #357, #358, #359, and #360) who received intravenous fluids through the unlicensed company. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 07/26/23. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer, insomnia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the 08/02/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact and required assistance with Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and review of pharmacy board website, the facility failed to provide pharmaceuticals services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of drugs when they allowed a company who was not licensed in Ohio by the State Pharmacy Board to administer dangerous intravenous fluid medications. This affected three (Residents #47, #78, and #87) of three reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility identified 22 (Residents #1, #3, #6, #11, #20, #23, #28, #35, #40, #46, #47, #52, #78, #85, #87, #92, #355, #356, #357, #358, #359, and #360) who received intravenous fluids through the company. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 07/26/23. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer, insomnia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the 08/02/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact and required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide puree foods per the spreadsheet approved by the dietitian. This had the potential to affect six (Residents #52, #30, #13, #4, #45 and #55) who received puree consistency diets from the kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Medical record review for Residents #52, #30, #13, #4, #45, and #55 revealed all residents were ordered to receive puree diets. Review of the dinner menu spreadsheet dated 11/14/23 revealed the puree consistency diet was to be prepared with puree carrots and the carrots and the bread was to be pureed separately. The puree carrot portion was four ounces and the puree bread was two ounces. Observation on 11/14/23 at 2:56 P.M. revealed [NAME] #107 prepared puree corn and puree bread together for the vegetable puree. The puree bread was not separated from the puree corn. [NAME] #107 prepared corn, and not carrots as listed on the spreadsheet. The menu spreadsheet and recipe were not used by [NAME] #107. Interview on 11/14/23 at 2:56 P.M. [NAME] #107 verified he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and pharmacy board website review, the facility failed to ensure an outside Intravenous (IV) company (IV Company #700) had a proper license to provide services to residents. This affected three (Residents #47, #78, and #87) of three reviewed for medications administered by IV Company #700. The facility identified 22 Residents (#1, #3, #6, #11, #20, #23, #28, #35, #40, #46, #47, #52, #78, #85, #87, #92, #355, #356, #357, #358, #359, and #360) who received intravenous fluids through the company. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 07/26/23. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer, insomnia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the 08/02/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #87's physician orders revealed an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control log, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have an affective antibiotic stewardship program. This affected five (#2, #23, #41, #61, and #91) of five residents reviewed on the infection log. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of the facility's infection log for October 2023 revealed Resident #2, Resident #23, Resident #41, Resident #61, and Resident #91 were ordered and received antibiotic medications for suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs). On 10/01/23, Resident #61 had increased confusion with no elevated temperature and was started on an antibiotic. Resident #61 was noted to have a UTI without a urinary catheter. On 10/04/23, Resident #91 was admitted to the facility with a UTI without a urinary catheter, no elevated temperature, and was started on an antibiotic. On 10/06/23, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with a UTI without a urinary catheter, no elevated temperature, and started on an antibiotic. On 10/17/23, Resident #23 had no elevated temperature, but was determined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights located in resident bathrooms had pull cords and residents would be able to activate if on the floor. This affected four (#29, #31, #89, and #407) of four residents reviewed for call light functionality. The census was 97. Findings include: Observation of four (#29, #31, #89, and #407) resident's bathrooms on 11/14/23 from 3:40 P.M. to 3:45 P.M. revealed the bathroom call lights did not have pull cords to activate the lights. During an interview on 11/14/23 at 3:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #29, Resident #31, Resident #89, and Resident #407's bathroom call lights did not have pull cords. The DON confirmed the four identified residents would not be able to activate the call light if the resident was on the floor in the bathroom. The DON also confirmed the four identified residents were capable of independently activating a call light. Review of the facility policy titled, Answering the Call Light, dated 01/12/20, revealed staff should be sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected two (Residents #47 and #44) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The census was 97. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 09/15/18. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, diabetes, renal failure, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was supervision for eating, substantial/maximal for toileting, supervision for transfers, and partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. She was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowels. Observation on 11/14/23 at 11:30 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #168 was assisting Resident #47 with getting dressed. The resident said, Help me, constantly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were consistent within the medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #33) of eight residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/08/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema, heart failure, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological, dementia, anxiety, and major depression disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #33's paper medical record revealed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order Form dated 02/09/22 revealing the resident's advanced directive was DNR Comfort Care Arrest. Review of the current physician order dated 08/15/22, located in the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received regular care conferences. This affected one (Resident#29) of one reviewed for care conferences. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/26/22. Diagnoses listed included prostate cancer, spinal stenosis, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Further review of MDS information revealed quarterly assessments were completed on 04/04/23, 07/04/23, and 09/07/23. Review of social service progress notes revealed a care conference was last held for Resident #29 on 03/16/23. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 10:28 A.M. the Administrator confirmed a care conference was not held for Resident #29 since March 03/16/23. The Administrator confirmed care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's feet were kept clean. This affected one (Resident #47) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living assistance. The census was 97. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 09/15/18. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, diabetes, renal failure, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was supervision for eating, substantial/maximal for toileting, supervision for transfers, and partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. She was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowels. Observation of Resident #47's feet on 11/13/23 at 10:04 A.M. revealed they were covered with a dark brown substance on the bottom of them. At 10:32 A.M. the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide incontinence care per standards of care. This affected one (Resident #47) of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 09/15/18. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, diabetes, renal failure, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was supervision for eating, substantial/maximal for toileting, supervision for transfers, and partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. She was always incontinent for bladder and frequently incontinent for bowels. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #47 on 11/14/23 at 11:43 A.M. revealed STNA #168 removed a soiled brief from the resident, stood her up on her walker, and took a wet towel and bent the resident over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a urinalysis as ordered. This affected one (Resident #78) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 03/17/23. Diagnoses included delusional disorders, chronic viral hepatitis C, depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, opioid abuse, other stimulant abuse, vascular dementia moderate with agitation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #78 required staff assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. Resident #78 was occasionally incontinent of bladder. Review of nurse's notes for Resident #78 dated 10/18/23 at 4:18 P.M. revealed the resident was noted with increased behaviors as well as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plans when new conditions were identified for two (#33 and #102) out of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, pseudomonas, anoxic brain damage, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, epilepsy, dysphagia, tachycardia, altered mental status, and supplemental oxygen. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/05/19, revealed Resident #33 had moderately impaired cognitive skills, required total dependence from staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #33 has impairments to bilateral upper and lower extremities. Review of Occupational Therapy (OT) notes, dated 05/30/19, revealed a goal for Resident #33 to tolerate assessment and trial/provision of hand splint for right hand with contractures noted at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Carver Living CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Countryside Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation LLCFremont, OH 1 of 5Harrison Pavilion Care CenterCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Smoky Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterPigeon Forge, TN 1 of 5The Greens at GastoniaGastonia, NC 1 of 5Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterTaylorsville, NC 1 of 5Weakley Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterDresden, TN 2 of 5Cedars Of Lebanon Care CenterLebanon, OH 2 of 5Clovernook Health Care And Rehabilitation CenterCincinnati, OH 2 of 5Louisville Gardens Care CenterLouisville, OH 2 of 5Ridgewood Living & Rehabilitation CenterWashington, NC 2 of 5Solon Pointe At Emerald RidgeSolon, OH 2 of 5The Greens at HickoryHickory, NC 2 of 5The Greens at LincolntonLincolnton, NC 2 of 5The Greens at ViewmontHickory, NC 2 of 5Willow Ridge Of NCRutherfordton, NC 3 of 5Flint Ridge Nrsg & Rehab CtrNewark, OH 3 of 5Lincoln Crawford Care CenterCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Meadow Wind Health Care CenterMassillon, OH 3 of 5Northcrest Rehab And Nursing CenterNapoleon, OH 3 of 5Pineville Rehabilitation and Living CenterPineville, NC 3 of 5Scarlet Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCincinnati, OH 3 of 5The Greens at HendersonvilleHendersonville, NC 3 of 5The Greens at Pinehurst Rehabilitation & Living CePinehurst, NC 3 of 5The Greens at Spruce PinesSpruce Pine, NC 4 of 5Cedarview Care CenterLebanon, OH 4 of 5Sunrise Nursing Healthcare LLCAmelia, OH 4 of 5The Greens at Maple LeafStatesville, NC 4 of 5The Greens at WeavervilleWeaverville, NC 4 of 5Twilight Gardens Nursing And RehabilitationNorwalk, OH 5 of 5Locust Ridge Healthcare LLCWilliamsburg, OH 5 of 5The Greens at CabarrusConcord, NC

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
YTMBH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 10/01/2020
YW MEADOWBROOK, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST21%since 10/01/2020
JEREMIAS, SAMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 10/01/2020
WOLMARK, YEHUDAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER21%since 10/01/2020
FAZEKAS, CAROLINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2023
STERN, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 9%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,697per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365375. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next