Meadow Wind Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for treatment of urinary tract infection.Actual harm occurred to Resident #44 on 06/07/26, when the facility failed to notify the nurse practitioner (NP) of abnormal urine analysis and culture results, which were positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL (extended spectrum beta-lactamase) bacteria greater than 100,000 colony-forming units per milliliter, causing a delay in treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI). The results were not reported to the NP until 06/16/26 at approximately 9:51 P.M. At approximately 11:00 P.M. on 06/16/26, Resident #44 was found by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #515 during medication pass to slowly respond to questions but not open her eyes and had an abnormal pulse of 44 beats per minute. At 12:35 A.M. on 06/17/26 Resident #44 was transported by emergency medical services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of resident assessments. This affected two residents (Resident #9 and Resident #11) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 77. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 04/24/26. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia; acute bronchitis due to other specified organisms; dependence of respirator (ventilator); pseudomonas; muscle weakness, dysphagia; symbolic dysfunctions; weakness; need for assistance with personal care; pneumonia; acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation; benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms; type two diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of medication orders, both current and discontinued, revealed no orders for insulin injections. Review of medication orders revealed on 05/23/26, Resident #9 was ordered Levaquin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility investigation, staff and family interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were honored for residents. This affected one (Resident #91) of two residents reviewed for Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). The facility also failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate in the medical records. This affected one (Resident #28) of 29 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 77.Findings include: 1.Review of the closed medical record for Resident #91 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pulmonary embolism and tracheostomy status. Resident #91 did not have a power of attorney or legal guardian. Resident #91's son was listed as the first emergency contact, and daughter-in-law was listed as the second emergency contact. Review of the physician order dated [DATE] for Resident #91 revealed the resident had a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure vision services were provided to Resident #90. The affected one (Resident #90) of one resident reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 77.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed admission date of 03/02/26 for diagnoses of end-stage renal disease, renal dialysis, heart failure, dysphagia, and a dialysis fistula. Review of the facility admission packet for Resident #90 revealed a consent signed by Resident #90's daughter and dated 03/02/26 to receive services from 360 Care (ancillary service partner) for audiology, vision, and podiatry services.Review of the initial comprehensive MDS 3.0 assessment completed on 03/09/26 for Resident #90 revealed she required hearing aid and use of glasses with no significant impairments and able to make self-understood and understood others. Resident #90 required substantial to maximum assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, and transfers and partial to moderate assistance with showering/bathing.Review of physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to inform the nurse practitioner of a dietary recommendation to address hydration needs for Resident #96. This affected one resident (Resident #96) of four residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 77.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #96 revealed an admission date of 10/01/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, mild gastritis and gastrointestinal bleed. Resident #96 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility.Review of the care plan for Resident #96, initiated 10/05/24 and revised on 05/21/26, revealed she was at risk for altered nutrition and fluid imbalance related to hypothyroid, gastrointestinal bleed, stroke, mild gastritis, congestive heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected three (Residents #35, #67 and #70) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 77. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/14/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, and dependence on respiratory ventilator status. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #35 was to have his oxygen tubing and set-up changed every Thursday and as needed dated 11/03/25. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for June 2026 revealed Resident #35's oxygen tubing was to be changed on 06/18/26 and staff had not completed this as ordered. Observation and interview on 06/22/26 at 10:18 A.M. of Resident #35 with Respiratory Therapist (RT) #535 revealed his oxygen tubing was dated 06/12/26. RT #535 verified his oxygen tubing should have been changed on 06/18/26. She verified the respiratory department was in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility assessment, the facility did not ensure licensed nursing staff completed competencies on hire and demonstrated competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care and services based on residents assessed needs. This affected two (Resident #44 and #96) of two residents reviewed for competent nursing services. The facility census was 77.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 02/07/25. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage three, peptic ulcer, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, bradycardia, hypotension, and intestinal bypass and anastomosis status. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed on 06/03/26, Resident #44 had a urinalysis completed with culture and sensitivity that was positive for urinary infection. The result of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control procedures during incontinence care for Resident #55. The affected one resident (#55) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 77.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia of right side, dementia and bowel and urine incontinence.Review of the minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was not able to vocalize her care needs and unable to complete the brief interview for mental status. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #55 was dependent on staff for all personal care including showering/bathing, dressing, mobility with a wheelchair, and transfers with a mechanical lift. Resident #55 required a feeding tube for nutrition.Observation on 06/23/26 at 1:30 P.M. of incontinence care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to implement isolation protocols and failed to maintain infection control during tracheostomy care and blood glucose monitoring. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #178's medical record revealed diagnoses including history of malignant neoplasm of the breast and intestine and dyspnea. On 09/28/24, Resident #178 tested positive for COVID-19 and was placed in droplet isolation. The isolation was to be discontinued 10/09/24. On 10/07/24 at 12:47 P.M., Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) #820 was observed opening Resident #178's door to exit into the corridor. The N95 mask she was wearing in Resident #178's room remained on. After opening the door, COTA #820 removed the N95. Without performing hand hygiene, COTA #820 reached around the door and into the isolation cart to obtain a new N95 mask and held it over her face. COTA #820 pushed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to cover an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag. This affected one resident (Resident #276) out of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 75. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #276 revealed an admission date 10/03/24 with diagnoses including history of falls, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes mellitus. Resident #276 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks, used a front wheeled walker for ambulation assistance, and was receiving physical and occupational therapy services. Review of Resident #276 physician orders revealed an order dated 10/03/24 for foley catheter bag cover every shift, an order dated 10/04/24 for privacy cover to foley catheter drainage bag every shift for maintaining dignity, and an order dated 10/03/24 for foley catheter care every shift. Review of Resident #276 baseline care plan dated 10/03/24 revealed Resident #276 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enteral tube feeding bottles and water flush bags were properly labeled with the flow rate and the date and time the bottles/bags were hung for administration for Resident #176, and failed to ensure orders were obtained for Resident #177 regarding cleaning and flushing of an enteral feeding tube. This affected two residents (Resident #176 and #177) out of two residents reviewed for enteral tube feedings. The facility census was 75. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #176 revealed an admission date 05/10/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, anxiety, heart failure, and placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Resident #176 was cognitively intact and required assistance from the staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including medication administration and tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH