Ridgewood Living & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 113.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when Resident #74 a) rolled out of bed during care sustaining a left front scalp hematoma (an injury with swelling caused by blood pooling under the skin) requiring evaluation in the emergency room and b) rolled out of bed during care sustaining a 15 centimeter scalp laceration (cut) requiring evaluation in the emergency room and wound closure with 9 sutures (stiches) and 7 staples. This was for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #74).Findings included:1a. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness.Resident #74's physician's orders revealed she was not receiving any anti-coagulant (blood thinning) medication.A nursing progress note for Resident #74 dated 7/12/24 at 12:30 PM written by Nurse #2 revealed he had been called to Resident #74's room. Resident #74 was on the floor with a bump on her head. Resident #74 told…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, staff and physician interviews the facility 1) failed to provide education regarding the benefits and possible side effects of a COVID-19 vaccination, offer a COVID-19 vaccination, and then document either a refusal or the administration of a COVID-19 vaccination in the past 14 months in the resident's medical record for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #54 and Resident #71) and 2) failed to maintain documentation that staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine and were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine in the past 14 months for 156 of 156 facility staff reviewed for COVID-19 immunization.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Vaccine dated 12/28/21 revealed in part the following: COVID-19 Vaccine Education for Staff and Resident 1. COVID-19 vaccinations shall be offered to all staff and residents (or applicable POA [Power of Attorney]/Guardian) .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure nurse aides (NAs) received 12 hours of in-service training annually which included abuse and dementia training. This was for 3 of 5 NA files reviewed (NA#5, NA #6, and NA #7).Findings included: 1a. A review of the employee file and training information for NA #5 indicated a hire date of 2/1/24. There was no dated training to provide evidence NA #2 received 12 hours of in-service training including abuse and dementia training in the previous 12 months.b. A review of the employee file and training information for NA #6 indicated a hire date of 7/11/24. There was no dated training to provide evidence NA #6 received in-service training on abuse and dementia training in the previous 12 months.c. A review of employee file and training information for NA #7 indicated a hire date of 6/20/24. There was no dated training to provide evidence NA #7 received abuse training in the previous 12 months.On 09/5/2025 at 1:06 PM an interview with the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) indicated she was responsible for tracking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews with staff, pharmacy consultant, pharmacy accounts receivable clerk, and Medical Director, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of controlled medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #22).The findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Protocol dated 9/24/18 and last revised on 6/13/21 revealed in part Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberated misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A physician ordered dated 9/25/24 written by the Medical Director read Oxycodone (controlled pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5mg (milligram tablet). Take one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed.A physician ordered dated 9/25/24 written by the Medical Director revealed Buspirone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of falls. This was for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for accidents.Findings included:Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #74's hospital record dated 7/19/25 revealed she was being seen after a fall from bed at the facility. She had a significant scalp laceration which measured 15 centimeters in length. Her laceration was repaired using 7 staples and 9 sutures (stiches).Resident #74's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had one fall with no injury and one fall with injury since her prior MDS assessment.Resident #74's medical record revealed no other falls since her prior MDS assessment dated [DATE].On 09/05/2025 at 8:03 AM an interview with MDS Nurse #1 indicated she coded the falls section of Resident #74's MDS assessment dated [DATE]. She reported on 7/19/25 Resident #74 had one fall with injury. She stated her coding on Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop an individualized, person-centered comprehensive care plan to include the use of side rails for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for side rails (Resident #5).Findings included: 1.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 5 and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #5's electronic record revealed an assessment titled bed rail/assist device dated 8/24/24 and completed by Nurse #9 that indicated Resident #5 did not need or use side rails. A care plan with the latest review date of 9/9/24 revealed no reference to use of side rails for Resident #5. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #5 required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility, substantial/maximal assistance with lying to sitting on the side of the bed and was non-ambulatory. The MDS revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to maintain the sterility of tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the windpipe through the neck to provide an airway for breathing) care when Nurse #4 failed to perform hand hygiene and don (put on) sterile gloves after touching and disposing of a soiled split gauze pad and inner cannula and before placing the new sterile inner cannula and clean split gauze as well as donning sterile gloves over soiled gloves prior to suctioning. This was for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident #9). Findings included: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included persistive vegetative state and tracheostomy status. Resident #9's care plan last revised on 7/12/24 revealed him to have a tracheostomy. Resident #9's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was unable to be assessed for cognition due to comatose state. He was documented to receive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternatives prior to installing siderails, complete siderail assessments, assess entrapment risk, review the risks and benefits of siderails with the resident /resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to siderail use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for siderails (Resident #5, Resident #4).Findings included: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 5 and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #5's information face sheet revealed she was her own Responsible Party. Review of Resident #5's electronic medical record revealed an assessment titled bed rail/assist device dated 8/24/24 and completed by Nurse #9. The response to the question, Bed rails/assist devices are indicated for the resident at this time? was no. In an interview with Nurse #9 on 9/5/25 at 10:29 AM he stated he completed the assessment in Resident #5's room on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control practices and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the windpipe through the neck to provide an airway for breathing) when Nurse #4 provided tracheostomy care without wearing a gown. This was for 1 of 12 staff observed for infection control practices (Nurse #4).Findings included: The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 4/24/24 stated in part: EBP's are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. Gloves and gowns are applied prior to performing high-contact resident care activities such as tracheostomy care. Observation of Resident #9's door on 9/3/25 at 11:53 AM revealed signage for EBP. The signage indicated that staff providing high contact care to Resident #9 were required to wear gowns and gloves. Further observation revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, Responsible Party (RP), staff and physician interview the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and possible side effects of a pneumococcal immunization, offer a pneumococcal immunization, and then document either a refusal or the administration of a pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #6).Findings included:The facility's undated policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine revealed in part: All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in the preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections.7. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or vaccinations will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of vaccination.The CDC document titled Summary of Risk-based Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations dated 5/24/2025 revealed in part the following: Adults aged 19-[AGE] years old; The following guidance applies to adults younger than [AGE] years…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, physician interview, and a pest control supervisor interview the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program that was free of German cockroaches for 4 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for pest control services. Findings included: Documentation on the facility pest control company contract initiated on 6/27/2022 indicated that both interior and exterior pest control services, including cockroaches, were provided weekly to all rooms located on one wing of the facility. Pest control services rotated accordingly, so all wings and facility rooms were serviced at least once per quarter. Documentation on a pest control contract signed on 12/11/2024 revealed that a Roach Cleanout was negotiated for Rooms 409, 413, 415, 417, 419, and 421. Documentation on an unsigned pest control contract revealed a Roach Cleanout was being considered for Rooms 301, 302, 303, 305, 307, and 317. a. An observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC