Northcrest Rehab And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 53.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, staff interview, review of the fall investigation, review of staff statements, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow the care plan and the information on the Kardex (mechanism that provides Certified Nursing Assistants the care needs of the residents) when providing care to a dependent resident. This resulted in Actual Harm on 02/10/26 when Resident #11 fell out of bed and sustained a laceration to the back of her head. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/12/24. Diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) with loss of consciousness, chronic respiratory failure, paraplegia, contractures, heart failure, tracheostomy dependence for breathing, gastrostomy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor Resident #19's skin underneath a heel protector boot. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #19 developed two Deep Tissue Injuries (DTI) on the right foot, consistent with the strap of the heel protector boot being too tight. Additionally, the facility failed to complete accurate skin assessments and failed to ensure recommended interventions were in place for Resident #60. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #60 was discovered with an in-house acquired DTI to the foot. This affected two (Residents #19 and #60) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility's census was 64. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, pressure induced Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) deep tissue damage to right heel, Type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented related to COVID-19 droplet isolation and contact isolation. This affected four (#37, #28, #56 and #12) residents and had the potential to affect all 29 residents on the 300 and 400 halls (#1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #9, #10, #13, #16, #18, #20, #22, #26, #27, #30, #34, #36, #40, #41, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #58, and #163). The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses of vascular dementia and COVID-19 (initiated 01/13/25). Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had intact cognition. Review of a current physician order dated 01/13/25 revealed Resident #37 was in droplet isolation for COVID-19 with all services to be provided in the room. Review of the medical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were kept cleaned and trimmed on a dependent resident. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for clean and trimmed nails. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident (CVA - stroke) with left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 revealed he had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revised 01/25 for Resident #2 revealed the resident is care planned for self-care deficit due to CVA with left sided hemiplegia and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of the shower sheets dated 01/02/25 for Resident #2 revealed he had a bed bath per his preference and his fingernails were cleaned and trimmed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to apply brace/splint per physician order. This affected one (#55) of one resident reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 08/12/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, gastrostomy status, displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, tracheostomy status, presence of other vascular implants and grafts, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of current physician orders revealed left lower extremity PRAFO brace on in the morning and off at bedtime, passive range of motion to upper and lower extremities, rolled up wash cloth in right and left hand, remove every six hours and check skin integrity.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. This affected two residents (#15 and #48) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, cerebral infarction, and convulsions. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 12/27/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicting Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #15 was dependent on staff for toilet use, parts of dressing, bed mobility, and transfer. Resident #15 required maximal assistance with bathing. Resident #15 displayed verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others one to three days during the review period. Review of Resident #15's care plan revised 12/27/24 revealed supports and interventions in place for risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a proper manner. This affected two (Residents #22 and #16) of two residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/05/23 and a readmission date of 09/04/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition. Review of the Self-Medication Assessment, completed 12/04/24, revealed Resident #22 was unable to self-administer medications. Observation on 01/21/25 at 9:20 A.M. revealed a bottle of aspirin, dose 325 milligrams (mg), lying on top of Resident #22's bedside cabinet. Resident #22 was not in the room during the observation. Interview and observation on 01/21/25 at 9:24 A.M. with Unit Manager (UM) #700 confirmed bottle of 325…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain blood glucose levels as ordered. This affected one (#11) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 10/01/24 at 10:51 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 obtained Resident #11's medications from the medication cart. Medications included the administration of Novolog insulin determined by sliding scale blood glucose levels. At the time of the observation, LPN #300 stated she was unable to locate Resident #11 when the resident's insulin coverage was due at 7:00 A.M. and confirmed the 7:00 A.M. blood glucose lever was not obtained at that time. LPN #300 proceeded to Resident #11's room and obtained a blood sugar reading of 204 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). LPN #300 returned to the medication cart and obtained four (4) units of insulin via syringe, returned to the resident's room, and injected the dose of insulin into the resident. Review of Resident #11's medical record noted a physician order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident indwelling urinary catheters in an effective and sanitary manner. This affected one (#3) of one residents reviewed for urinary catheter care and function. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, xerosis cutis, neurofunction dysfunction of bladder, urinary retention, morbid obesity, acquired buried penis, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, erythema intertrigo, congestive heart failure, hypertension, lymphedema, adult failure to thrive, and major depression. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #3 with intact cognition, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living, utilized a indwelling urinary catheter, was incontinent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician, and within prescribed time frames, resulting in a medication error rate above five (5) percent (%). This affected two (#9 and #10) of three residents observed during medication administration. A total of two medications errors were observed out of 29 opportunities for a medication administration error rate of 6.9%. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/01/24 at 10:13 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 preparing Resident #9's medications for administration. At 10:22 A.M., LPN #300 proceeded into Resident #9's room and provided the resident's medications contained inside a medication cup. One medication included the antidepressant Cymbalta 30 milligram tablet. Resident #9 consumed the medications and LPN #300 exited the room. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a physician order dated 07/17/24 for the administration of Cymbalta oral capsule delayed release…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain resident common showers in a sanitary manner. This affected all 27 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #24, #24, #25, #26, #27) residing on the 100 and 200 halls. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation 09/10/24 at 9:48 A.M. with Environmental Services Director (ESD) #1 revealed the front 200-A common shower room had a black substance clinging to the ceiling and the corner of the wall above the shower stall. A black and orange colored substance and residue was observed on the shower stall baseboard. Continued observation on 09/10/24 at 9:50 A.M. of the 200-B common shower with ESD #1 revealed an orange and black substance clinging to the baseboard of the common shower stall. Interview on 09/10/24 at 9:51 A.M. with ESD #1 verified the above findings. ESD #1 stated he was unaware of the black and orange substances located in the 200-A and 200-B common shower rooms. Interview on 09/10/24 at 10:03 A.M. with State Tested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/30/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intellectual disabilities, stage III pressure ulcer to the upper right back, localized swelling mass and lump to trunk, cerebral infarction affecting right side with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, hypertension, scoliosis, chronic pain syndrome, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, severe protein calorie malnutrition and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/04/24, revealed Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired, had bilateral range of motion impairment to the upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH