Cedarview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 70.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the medication error log, review of the incident report, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #25) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 70. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 10/03/25 with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, and chronic pain.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25 dated 01/22/26 revealed the resident had moderate intact cognition. Resident was also assessed to be dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the physician's orders for Resident #25 revealed an order dated 11/15/25 to 11/17/25 for oxycodone oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) one tablet every six hours. Resident #25 had another order dated on 11/18/25 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility document Stability of Common Insulins in Vials and Pens, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of insulin. This affected two (Resident #07 and #19 ) out of 17 residents with insulin orders. In addition, the facility failed to ensure ophthalmic medication was labeled with an open date. This affected one (Resident #39) out of 12 residents with ophthalmic orders. The facility census was 70.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 01/20/26. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, and schizophrenia.Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #07 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL).Review of Resident #07's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/17/26 for Insulin Lispro subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit per milliliter (unit/mL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administered medications to residents as ordered. The medication administration observation identified four medication errors out of 39 medications administered for a medication error rate of 10.26 percent. This affected three (#19, #26, and #27) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #19 revealed an admission dated 02/04/23. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, age related cataract bilateral, dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. Review of a physician order dated 07/25/24 revealed Resident #19 was ordered Refresh Liquigel Ophthalmic Gel one (1) percent (%) eye drops to instill one drop in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted with repositioning to prevent skin impairment. This affected three (#46, #53, #72) of three residents reviewed for repositioning. The census was 74. Findings included 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/23. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive uropathy, diabetes, cerebrovascular attack, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and ventilator dependent. Review of the care plan for Resident #46 dated 01/02/24 revealed the resident was at risk for skin impairment related to immobility. Interventions included to assist to turn and reposition at frequent intervals to provide pressure relief and to offload the hips and sacrum to promote skin integrity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was rarely or never understood. The resident's was assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate skin assessment. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for skin assessments. The census was 74. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 03/08/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia or hypercapnia, obstructive uropathy, pneumonia, diabetes, and seizure disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #72 revealed the resident was rarely/never understood. The resident was dependent on toileting and bed mobility, was assessed with an indwelling catheter, was always incontinent for bowel, and was dependent on a tracheostomy and a ventilator. Review of a skin assessment dated [DATE] at 11:40 A.M. for Resident #72 documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #77 revealed there was not documentation in the skin assessment grid for any new areas of skin impairment. Review of Resident #72's physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to protect against the potential spread of food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified 13 residents who were NPO (nothing by mouth) and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observation on 04/18/24 at 1:16 P.M., revealed the refrigerator on the facility's C-hall contained 10 unlabeled containers, each containing unidentified substances. None of the containers were labeled nor dated. Additionally, there was a sandwich, which was loosely wrapped in a plastic sandwich bag, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated. Further observation revealed the refrigerator did not contain a thermometer, nor was any type of temperature log. Interview at the same time of the observation, with Registered Nurse (RN) #375 verified the 10 containers were unlabeled and undated and all foods in the refrigerator should be labeled and dated. RN #375 stated she thought…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition. This affected one (#22) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/19/24. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end-stage renal disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, fluid overload, pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene, sitting to lying, and rolling from side to side in bed, substantial/maximal assistance for lying to sitting on side of bed, and was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Completion and Submission Timeframe's policy and procedure, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS discharge assessment was completed within 14 days of discharge. This affected one (#60) of one resident reviewed for MDS discharge assessments. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 08/09/23, with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, polysubstance abuse, and nicotine addiction. Resident #60 was discharged on 12/15/23. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 is cognitively intact. The resident is independent for ambulation, transfers, dressing, and toileting, requires set up assistance for eating, oral and personal hygiene, and supervision with bathing. Review of the MDS discharge assessment for Resident #60 revealed a completion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Completion and Submission Timeframe's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion date. This affected three (#25, # 50, and #59) of three residents reviewed for MDS assessment submissions. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 12/16/14, with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, bi-polar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and alcohol abuse. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 is cognitively intact. Resident #25 is independent for mobility with no devices, transfers, toileting, dressing, requires set up assistance for eating and oral hygiene, and supervision for showering and personal hygiene. Review of MDS assessments for Resident #25 revealed a MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority of a significant change in condition for residents with mental disorders. This affected two (#9 and #49) of five residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, (PASARR) admission process. The total facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #49 include dementia, encephalopathy, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for self-care and mobility. Review of Resident #49's physician orders revealed the resident had orders for hospice service beginning on 07/27/23. Record review of Resident #49 revealed no Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, (PASARR) within 14 days of a significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-10 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CCH HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $655K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH