PruittHealth-Raleigh

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 143.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2025-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews with staff, resident, Contracted Transportation Company, and the Physician, the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free of neglect for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. On 4/25/25 at approximately 4:30 PM during transportation back to the facility from a medical appointment in the contracted transport van the resident's wheelchair flipped backwards landing horizontal on the floor of the van. Resident #1's head hit the van floor and her back sustained impact when the wheelchair backrest (the support structure for the user's back) hit the floor. The Contracted Transport Driver was not qualified to complete a clinical assessment of injury. He asked the resident if she was okay, set the wheelchair upright, secured the wheelchair in the van, and continued the trip back to the facility. The resident reported during the entire ride back to the facility the Contracted Transport Driver repeatedly stated that he was going to be fired for what happened. Upon return to the facility, the Contracted Transport Driver notified facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews with staff, resident, Contracted Transportation Company, and the Physician, the Contracted Transport Driver failed to have Resident #1 assessed for injury by a qualified professional prior to moving the resident following a fall in the transportation van and to notify the facility nursing staff of the fall in order for the resident to be clinically assessed for injuries from the fall. Resident #1 returned to the facility on 4/25/25 at approximately 5:30 pm and notified staff that her wheelchair had flipped backwards while being transported back to the facility and the Contracted Transport Driver lifted her and her wheelchair up from the floor and returned her to the facility. Resident #1 suffered pain rated a 10 out of 10 (with 10 being the worst pain possible) in her neck, shoulders, and back. The resident was transferred to the hospital where she was identified with a fracture at the superior endplate (flat surface at the top of each vertebra) of the L1 (lumbar spine region,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, resident, Contracted Transportation Company, and the Physician, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely secured in the contracted transport van during the return trip from an appointment back to the facility. On 4/25/25 the Contracted Transport Driver failed to secure Resident #1's wheelchair in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions prior to departing with the resident from the dialysis clinic. During travel, Resident #1's wheelchair flipped backwards landing with the backrest of wheelchair (the support structure for the user's back) on the floor of the van. Resident #1 remained in the wheelchair during the fall resulting in her head hitting the van floor and her back sustaining impact when the backrest of the wheelchair hit floor. Resident #1 suffered pain rated a 10 out of 10 (with 10 being the worst pain possible) in her neck, shoulders, and back. Staff reported the resident was moaning and crying out and that they had never seen Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident could access a light switch located behind her bed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #141).The findings included:Resident #141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #141 to be cognitively intact.During an observation on 1/12/2026 at 11:03 am revealed Resident #141 in bed, the overhead light was on, but no string was attached to overhead light. The light was attached to the wall, behind Resident #141's head.During an interview on 1/12/2026 at 11:04 am with Resident #141, the Resident stated that the string on her overhead light had been broken since she was admitted to the facility in December. Resident #141 stated that she slept with the light on all night and that she was able to sleep fine with the light on. Resident #141 further indicated that although the light being on did not bother…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the physician's orders and manufacturer's instructions for method of administration for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #118). Findings included:Resident #118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinsons disease, dementia and weakness.On 11/29/2025, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #118 was severely cognitively impaired. Eating and oral hygiene required substantial/maximal assistance. On 12/25/2025 a physician order stated that the resident takes medications whole in applesauce. A review of January 2026 active medications orders included Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) delayed-release 1 tablet once a day, Carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg 2 tablets at 6:00 am, 10:00 am and 4:00 pm and Bisacodyl (stimulant laxative) 5 mg delayed-release 1 tablet at bedtime. Review of Resident #118's January 2026 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activities program in the memory care unit of the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities (Resident #27). The findings included: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and depression. She resided on the memory care unit of the facility (a locked unit for individuals with dementia). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #27's assessment of daily and activity preferences revealed it was important for her to have reading material, listen to music, be around pets, keep up with news, be around groups of people, go outside and participate in religious services. Resident #27's care plan last reviewed on 11/18/25 revealed no goals or interventions related to activities. Review of the Kardex (resident care guide) for Resident #27 revealed no mention of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with the Pharmacy Consultant and staff interviews, the facility failed to have effective systems in place for the return of controlled medications to the pharmacy which resulted in the controlled medication being diverted from the medication cart for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #13). The findings included: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/7/25. Review of a certificate of inventory and destruction form with no date completed by Nurse #2 revealed she had started a return to pharmacy of 11 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone HCL for Resident #13 discharged on 1/7/25. Review of the facility reported incident investigation dated 1/23/25 revealed the narcotic count for the 100-hall medication cart was not correct the evening of 1/18/25 during narcotic reconciliation completed by the off going Nurse #1 and oncoming Nurse #2. The 100-hall medication cart was found to be missing one narcotic count sheet for oxycodone HCL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate regarding administration of Oxycodone Hydrochloride (HCL) (an opioid medication which is a controlled substance) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The findings included: A physician's order for Resident #13 dated 12/6/24, read Oxycodone HCL 5 mg to be administered 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A review of the narcotic controlled substance count record for Resident #13 revealed Nurse #1 signed out one Oxycodone HCL 5 mg on the following dates: - 12/8/24 at 9:30 am - 12/11/24 at 8:45 am - 12/12/24 at 8:00 am - 12/17/24 at 1:30 pm - 12/20/24 at 3:00 pm - 12/22/24 at 9:00 am - 12/22/24 at 6:00 pm - 12/24/24 at 8:00 am A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #13 revealed no documentation by Nurse #1 for the Oxycodone HCL 5 mg on the following dates: - 12/8/24 at 9:30 am - 12/11/24 at 8:45 am - 12/12/24 at 8:00 am - 12/17/24 at 1:30 pm - 12/20/24 at 3:00 pm - 12/22/24 at 9:00 am -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident # 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated she had severe cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, and needed supervision for ambulating around the unit. The MDS also documented that Resident #44 required a trunk restraint (a restraint on the torso that prevents a resident from getting up out of a chair) once during the observation period. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders from 7/1/24-11/14/24 did not reveal an order for a restraint. Review of Resident #44's progress notes from 7/1/24-11/14/24 did not reveal notes that she had any behaviors or any indications of a need for a restraint. The notes did not document that a restraint was used. In an interview on 11/12/24 at 12:22 PM, Nurse #4, Resident #44's regular charge nurse, said Resident #44 never had a restraint. In an interview on 11/15/24 at 1:20 PM, Nurse #5 said she completed the MDS for Resident #44. She said she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer the resident the right to participate in the person-centered planning process for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents #96 and Resident #21). Findings included: 1. Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, and depression. Resident #96's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was cognitively intact and required substantial to dependent assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL). Resident #96's care plans were noted as last reviewed or revised on 11/11/24. Review of Resident #96's record did not indicate care plan meetings had been conducted. On 11/12/24 at 10:32 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #96 who deferred all questions to her Family Member. Her Family Member stated early in Resident #96's admission he had participated in a care plan meeting, but it had been a while since he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter bag from touching the floor to reduce the risk of infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #5) reviewed with urinary catheters. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function has declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own), obstructive and reflux uropathy (when urine cannot drain through the urinary tract and urine backs up into the kidneys), artificial openings of urinary tract (a medical condition where a surgical procedure has created an opening in the urinary system to allow urine to exit the body when the normal pathway is blocked or damaged), and urinary tract infection (UTI). Resident #5's care plan dated 10/3/2024 revealed focus areas for catheter care and at risk for infection. Interventions included not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, staff, and Responsible Party (RP) interviews the facility failed to obtain the resident's consent before depositing and withdrawing the resident's personal funds into and from his non-transferring personal funds account. This was for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #52) reviewed for personal funds. Findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). A review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #52's current Resident Fund Management Service authorization and agreement to handle resident funds dated 6/29/21 revealed Resident #52 provided his written consent for a non-transferring account (no-automatic transfer of deposits to pay for care costs). This consent was witnessed by the facility Regional Financial Counselor. A review of Resident #52's personal check #480 dated 10/10/22 revealed it was made out to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, staff, and Responsible Party (RP) interviews the facility failed to deliver a residents personal mail unopened. This was for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for privacy of communication. Findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). A review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. On 9/25/23 at 3:09 PM in interview Resident #52 stated he was still able to take care of his finances including his tax refunds himself and it was important for him to continue doing this. He went on to say he used the facility address as his mailing address because he was residing in the facility when he completed his tax refund forms. Resident #52 stated he was expecting 2 tax refund checks for the tax forms he completed, and he never received them. He went on to say this worried him. He stated he had contacted the Internal Revenue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$16,152 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,076 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
• $8,076 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC