Yanceyville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 148.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation after a new serious mental illness disorder was identified for residents previously determined to have a Level I PASRR status for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents #10, #79, #120, #145). 3. Resident #120's Level I PASRR Determination Notification document dated 6/12/25 revealed the document was valid for his stay at the facility. The document further indicated no further PASSR screening was required unless a significant change occurred. Resident #120 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 10/13/25 for Risperidone (an antipsychotic medication used to treat bipolar disorder) 0.5 milligram (mg) at bedtime for mood. Review of a Psychiatric note dated 11/19/25 revealed Resident #120 was assessed by the Psychiatric Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store dry food away from moisture, keep dry goods covered, failed to label and date leftover food stored for use, and discard expired food. This was for 1 of 1 dry goods storage room, 1 of 1 walk-in cooler, 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator. The facility also failed to maintain the walk in refrigerator floor in a clean and sanitary condition, keep 1 of 4 ice machines clean, and failed to maintain the ceiling above the steam table to prevent peeling paint. These failures had the potential to affect food served to residents.Findings include:1a. On 5/26/26 at 9:20 AM during an observation of the dry storage area with Dietary Manager #1, eight 8 ounce white disposable cups half filled with rice crisp cereal sat on a tray with white powder on the surface. The cups were covered. A second tray was stacked on top of the white disposable cups. The tray also had twelve 8 ounce disposable cups of dry cereal that were covered. The tray also had some white powder on it. None of the cups were labeled or dated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #9).The findings included:Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included legal blindness and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9's assessment of daily activity preferences revealed it was somewhat important for him to listen to music and to go outside.Review of the care plan last revised on 3/11/26 revealed no goals or interventions related to activities.Review of Resident #9's activity participation documentation for the month of May 2026 revealed self-directed activities included watching tv and relaxing in room, and 1:1 activity noted staff provided hydration and snacks.The Activity Director was interviewed on 5/29/26 at10:30 AM. The Activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activity program that met the individual interests and needs for 3 of 4 cognitively impaired residents reviewed for activities (Residents #32, Resident #44 and Resident #9). The findings included: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic behavior and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Modified Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The assessment indicated Resident #32 preferred listening to music, keeping up with news, participating in group activities, and spending time outdoors when the weather was good. Review of the care plan dated 2/13/26 revealed the resident was care planned for activities and was dependent on staff to meet emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. Interventions included ensuring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, and Resident Representative (RR) interview, the facility failed to identify hearing aides were missing and determine whether an appointment was needed to maintain hearing abilities for a resident with reported hearing difficulties for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication (Resident #81). The findings included:Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had severe cognitive impairment and was coded for moderate hearing difficulty with the use of hearing aids.The care plan initiated on 7/25/25 and reviewed on 2/26/26 indicated Resident #81 had a care plan in place for having a communication/hearing impairment and wore bilateral hearing aids. The written interventions included staff to assist Resident #81 daily with putting the hearing aids in every morning and removing them every night and to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide pureed food items with a pudding like consistency as required. This failure had the potential to affect 11 of 11 residents who had orders for a pureed texture diet.Findings included:1a. A continuous lunch meal observation in the 500 hallway dining room on 5/26/26 from 12:10 PM to 12:20 PM revealed that residents on the 500 hallway received their trays first. Two residents were present in the 500-hallway dining room, each receiving assistance from staff. Both residents had meal tickets indicating a regular diet with pureed consistency.Observation of the residents' trays revealed a lunch meal consisting of pureed tuna salad, pureed broccoli salad, pureed potato salad, and pureed bread. The food was served on a divided plate. Pureed peaches and pears was dessert and served in an individual cup. The pureed food in the divided plated appeared thin and runny, with liquid separating from the solids. When staff tilted the spoon, the food ran off the spoon and did not hold its shape.During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep food preparation areas and food service equipment clean, free from debris, grease buildup, and/or dried spills during two kitchen observations. The facility failed to clean the ceiling vents located over the food preparation and food service areas. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: During a kitchen tour on 2/24/25 at 10:32 AM, the following observations were made with the kitchen Regional Dietary Director: a. The 6- stove burners had heavy grease build-up on the stove burners, walls behind the stove, and front of the stove. There were large amounts of burnt foods, dried, encrusted, liquid and splatters throughout the stove area. b. The 2-plate warmers had 2 rows of clean plates stored inside the warmer. The inside of warmer had dried liquid spills and food particles inside and dried liquid spills on the outside. The inside also had old food crumbs all around. c. The 6-compartment steam table had floating food particles in standing water, the lids of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the garbage and refuse was contained in 3 of 3 dumpsters and 1 of 1 grease interceptor container and failed to ensure the surrounding area clean and free from debris. This practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents. The findings included: During an initial tour observation on 2/24/25 at 10:45AM, revealed there were 3 dumpsters and 1 grease interceptor container located near a wooded area at the back of the facility that had large amounts trash bags of garbage and refuse overflowing from the tops and loose paper products, boxes, mattresses, furniture old pallets, clothing, blankets and loose food products outside of dumpsters on the ground and surrounding areas. The grease interceptor container was leaking grease on the ground along with the trash onto the parking lot. A follow-up observation was conducted on 2/25/25 at 7:30 AM revealed the trash bags filled with garbage left on the ground overflowing and the surrounding area had not been thoroughly cleaned evidence by the remaining paper and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activity program that met the individual interests and needs for 4 of 5 cognitively impaired residents reviewed for activities (Residents #29, Resident #52, Resident #137 and Resident #68). The findings included: 1a. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diagnoses included cognitive impairment and dementia. Resident #29 resided on the memory care unit. Resident #29 was coded on the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] as having cognition impairment and he needed assistance with activities. The MDS also coded Resident #29's activity interest as very important to participate in favorite activities to include pets, music and news and current events. The annual activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29's preferences included listening to music, news, and current events. A focus area on the care plan dated 2/18/25 revealed Resident #29 was dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote care in a dignified manner for 3 of 3 residents who were assisted with meals. Staff were observed standing beside the side of the residents' beds while feeding assistance was provided (Resident #62, Resident #14 and Resident # 68). Findings included: 1. Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated Resident #62 was dependent on staff for eating and was on a therapeutic diet. The assessment indicated the resident had a significant weight loss and was under hospice care. During a continuous lunch meal observation on 2/24/25 from 1:15 PM to 1:20 PM, Resident #62 was observed in bed and Nurse Aide (NA) #2 was observed standing beside Resident #62's bed, leaning over and assisting the resident with eating. There was one chair on the other side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $750K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC