No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beatrice Health and Rehabilitation

1800 Irving Street, Beatrice, NE 68310 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (402) 223-2311 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 223-2311 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1101 N 10th St · (402) 228-3436 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
910 E Court St · (402) 223-4779 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1300 E Court St · (402) 223-4047 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(402) 228-5200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.4%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.2%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%4.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%20.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.2%75.9%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.9%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%11.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.901.811.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.741.921.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.71U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.8%CMS range 41.7–60.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 4.9–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.6–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
43.5%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 56.9 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.446 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-09)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11C The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed in the kitchen in order to prevent the spread of food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all the resident that reside in the facility. The facility census was 55. Findings are: Observation of meal preparation on 4/8/25 at 6:45 AM with Cook-A. Cook-A had gloves on when surveyor arrived. The chili recipe was on the prep table. Cook-A took hamburger out of the packages and placed in a pan and placed on the stove. At 6:49 AM Cook-A performed hand hygiene with soap and water for 13 seconds. Cook-A donned gloves and cut up onion and placed in another pan after measuring. At 6:52 AM Cook-A performed hand hygiene with soap and water for 10 seconds. Cook-A placed 1 can of chili beans, and ¾ of can of diced tomatoes and put these in the pan, added water, tomato juice, a packet of chili mix, and stirred. At 7:00 AM Cook-A performed hand hygiene with soap and water for 15 seconds. Observation of Cook-A obtaining food temperatures for the South dining room on 4/8/25 at 7:58 am.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an as needed antipsychotic medication had a 14-day stop date as required for Resident 38. This affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 55. Findings are: A record review of Resident 38's admission Record printed 04/07/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that can cause changes in consciousness, thinking, and behavior), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), arthritis in both knees, anxiety disorder, high blood pressure, an irregular heartbeat, heart failure, and chronic (long-term) kidney disease. A record review of Resident 38's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025 revealed an order for olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication that may be used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during catheter and peri-cares for Residents 28 and 54, failed to ensure wipes were not removed from the wipes container with contaminated gloves for Residents 28 and 54, failed to ensure the drainage catheter bag was kept below the level of the bladder during a transfer for Resident 28, and failed to perform hand hygiene after removal of gloves for Resident 28 to prevent the potential for cross contamination. The facility census was 55. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 28's admission Record dated 4/7/25 revealed re-admission to the facility was 6/22/2023. Observation on 4/6/25 at 12:34 PM revealed Resident 28 had sediment in catheter tubing. Observation on 4/07/25 at 10:00 AM Resident 28's urine in catheter tubing is cloudy, mucous with small amount of red tinge. Observation of Resident 28's catheter cares on 4/7/25 at 10:30 AM by Nurses aide (NA)-B and (NA)-C. NA-B and NA-C applied gowns and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006. 18B Based on observation, and interview; the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and condition of vents located in rooms 7, 16, 17, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 47, 48. This affected a total of 10 rooms. The facility census was 61. Findings are: An observation during an environmental tour on 04/23/2024 at 8:53 AM to 9:15 AM with Maintenance Direcectorrevealed that there was a thick brown buildup of debris located on the outside of vents in rooms: 7, 16, 17, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 47, and 48. An interview with Maintenance Director on 04/23/2024 at 9:15 AM confirmed that there was a thick brown buildup of debris located on the outside of vents in rooms: 7, 16, 17, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 47, and 48. An interview on 04/23/24 at 1:40 PM with Maintenance Director revealed that there was no policy or procedure for vent checks or cleaning and further revealed no monthly tracking or documentation of vent checks or cleaning had been completed. Maintenance stated that there was an inhouse system on the computer that was used to communicate needs for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 D3 Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to maintain indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) drainage bag below bladder level during toileting and catheter cares for Resident 39. Facility census was 61. Findings are: A record review of Resident 39s diagnosis list revealed an admission date of 11/2/2021 with diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and overactive bladder. A review of the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care policy dated 1/2022 revealed that the catheter drainage bag was to be kept below the level of the bladder. An observation on 04/22/2024 at 2:00 PM of Nursing Assistant (NA)-F and NA-E completing catheter cares on for Resident 39 revealed the resident was seated on the toilet in bathroom with the catheter drainage bag positioned on the transfer device.The drainage bag was above the level of residents' bladder and remained there until resident was transferred into wheelchair. The total time the drainage bag was viewed above bladder level was 20 minutes. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to administer the correct medication and give within the time frame prescribed by the physician for 1 (Resident 46) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 61. Findings are: Observation on 4/18/24 at 12:30 PM of Medication Aide (MA)-G administering medications to Resident 46 revealed hand hygiene was performed. MA-G then checked the EMAR (a legal record of the medications administered to a patient at a facility by a health care professional) before administration and after when she documented that the medications were given.The medications were given whole in applesauce were: Bisoprolol Fumarate 10 mg QD (every day), Bupropion HCL SR 150 mg QD, Lasix 40 mg QD, Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-250 mg TID, Entresto 24-26 mg BID (twice a day), Gabapentin 100 mg 1 cap BID, Oxybutyrin CL ER 10 mg QD, Potassium CL ER 10 meq 2 tabs QD, Ropinrole HCL 0.25 mg QD, Solifenacin Succ 10 mg QD, Miralax 17 GM QD mixed in water, Apple Cider Vinegar capsule 450 mg 1 cap QD, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.007. 04D Based on observation, and interviews; the facility failed to maintain mechanical ventilation in residents' bathrooms located in rooms 38, 39, 40, 47, 48. The facility census was 61. Findings are: An observation during an environmental tour on 04/23/2024 at 8:53 AM to 9:15 AM with Maintenance Director revealed that the vents in the following rooms were not functioning: 38, 39, 40, 47, and 48. An interview with Maintenance on 04/23/2024 at 9:15 AM confirmed that vents in the following rooms were not functioning: 38, 39, 40, 47, and 48. An interview on 04/23/24 at 1:40 PM with Maintenance Director revealed that there was no policy or procedure for vent function checks and further revealed no tracking or documentation of vent function checks had been completed. Maintenance Director revealed that there was an in house system on the computer that was used to communicate needs for housekeeping and maintenance and there were no current entries noted in the system regarding nonfunctioning vents. An interview on 04/23/24 1:45 PM Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6 Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressuretreatment that uses mild air pressure to keep your breathing airways open) for 1 (Resident 70) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 61. Findings are: Observation on 4/17/24 at 9:41 AM revealed a CPAP that was assembled and sitting on bed side table in Resident 70's room. Interview on 4/17/24 at 9:41 AM with Resident 70 revealed [gender] has woren the CPAP every night since admission to the facility. Record review revealed Resident 70's undated Face Sheet revealed Resident 70 was admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the undated Diagnosis Report revealed Resident 70 had a diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Record review of Resident 70's Hospital admission Physician orders revealed no CPAP orders on 2/19/24. Record review revealed no physician order for a CPAP or the settings and was not on eMAR (a legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure that Resident 25 was free from unnecessary medications by attempting a gradual dosage reduction. Sampled resident total 1 of 1. Facility census 61. A record review for Resident 25s face sheet revealed that admission was 05/09/2020. A record review of the undated Diagnosis list for Resident 25 revealed Major Depressive Disorder ( a person with persistently low or depressed mood), Delusional Disorders (one or more firmly held false beliefs that persist for at least a month) , Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance (changes in memory, thinking and behavior resulting from changes in the brain), Anxiety Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder ( a combination of symptoms such as mood disorders, hallucinations, mania, and delusions) and, Depression, and Unspecified Psychosis ( an individual that has a psychotic episode, but does not meet any other criteria for a more specific diagnosis). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), (a tool that measures health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during wound cares for 1 (Resident 16) of 1 sampled resident, and during catheter cares for 1 (Resident 39) of 1 sampled resident. Facility census was 61. Findings are. A. A review of the undated Infection Control Prevention and Control Program- Hand Hygiene Policy revealed hand hygiene is to be completed at the following times: -before and after contact with residents, -before and after handling an invasive device (a device inserted into a body cavity) such as a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder), -before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care, -after contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of the resident, -after contact with a Resident's intact skin, and -after contact with blood and body fluids. A review of the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care policy dated 1/2022 revealed that hand hygiene using soap and water, and putting gloves on should be completed prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04D2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified dietician on a full time basis or other clinically qualified nutrition professional. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents who reside in the facility. Findings are: Interview on 04/30/23 at 07:25 AM with Cook-G revealed the facility does not have a qualified dietary manager. Interview on 05/01/23 at 10:08 AM with Dietary Aide (DA)-H confirmed the facility does not have a qualified dietary manager and has not for almost one year. Record review of an all staff listed provided by the facility on 4/30/2023 revealed no Dietary Manager. Interview on 5/01/23 at 10:30 AM with the Administrator confirmed that the facility does not have a qualified Dietary Manager or that a Registered Dietician was employed full time.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were maintained to prevent the potentail of foodborne illness which had the potentail to affect 58 out of 60 residents who recieved meals from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure proper food handling and serving to 2 Residents (Resident 31 and Resident 37) out of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 60. Findings Are: A) Observation on 04/30/23 at 12:00 PM of the main kitchen revealed the temperature of the food was not taken from the steam table prior to serving residents in the main dining room. Interview on 04/30/23 at 12:30 PM with Cook-G revealed temperatures were not taken prior to the food being served to the residents. Observation on 05/01/23 at 12:15 PM of food temperatures being taken of the last tray from the facility's food cart using the facility's kitchen thermometer revealed; -chicken breast at 100 degrees Fahrenheit -peas at 90 degrees Fahrenheit -garlic buttered noodles 90 degrees Fahrenheit Interview on 05/01/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASARR (A Level II is necessary to confirm the indicated Mental Illness (MI)/Intellectual Disability (ID) diagnosis and to determine whether placement or continued stay in a Nursing Facility is appropriate) was completed after receiving a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder on 5/5/22 for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 15). The facility identified a census of 60. Findings are: Record review of the PASARR Level I (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review that is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) dated 12/13/21 contained a diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder with no ID noted. Record review of the diagnosis list for Resident 15 revealed a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health problem where you experience psychosis as well as mood symptoms) dated 5/5/22 with no new PASSAR assessment completed. Record review of the policy titled Resident Assessment, MI/MR, Preadmission Screening for with a last revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) included interventions for dialysis and for nutrition for 1 resident (Resident 35) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 60 at the time of survey. Findings are: Record review of Resident 35's CCP, dated 5/1/23 confirmed the admission date to the facility was on 3/27/2023. Further review revealed dialysis and nutrition interventions were not on the resident's comprehensive careplan. Record review of the facility policy titled Care and Treatment Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated 8/2017 revealed the facility shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident for instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/02/23 at 1:13 PM confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 2 (Resident 21 and Resident 43) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 60. Findings are: A) Observation on 4/30/23 at 12:47 PM of Resident 21's room revealed Resident 21's oxygen (O2) tubing was attached to a portable tank on the back of the wheelchair with the nasal cannula (a device used to deliver oxygen through the nose) touching the wheelchair. Observation further revealed Resident 21 had 02 nasal cannula attached to the oxygen concentrator which was dated 4/23 and the humidifier bottle to be dated 4/16. Observation on 05/01/23 at 8:34 AM of Resident 21's room revealed the O2 tubing for Resident 21 was attached to a portable tank on the back of the wheelchair with the nasal cannula touching the wheelchair. Observation further revealed Resident 21 had 02 nasal cannula attached…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DAYTON, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/31/2019
JORGENSEN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/18/2011
HELENTHAL, TARAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2021
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
MORRIS, SPENCERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2016
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011
IRVING HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$676K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 13%Other / private 28%

This home reported $676K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,711per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285130. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next