Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
1511 Clements Bridge Rd, Deptford, NJ 08096 · For profit - Corporation · 240 certified beds · (856) 845-9400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.6% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 5.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.1% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.7% | 12.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.1% | 80.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 1.11 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.3%CMS range 40.6–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.3–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.6–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 226.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician ordered medication was signed as administrated at the time of administration in accordance with professional standard of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for standards of practice (Resident #7).The evidenced was as followed: Reference: The practice of nursing as a Licensed Practical Nurse is defined as performing tasks, and responsibilities within the framework of case finding, reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a Registered Nurse, or otherwise legally authorized Physician or Dentist. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; acute right heart failure, diabetes, major depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner as evidenced by the following: On 8/8/25 at 9:58 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following: 1. The microwave had multicolored dried stuck on debris on the interior ceiling of the unit. The FSD acknowledge it was not properly cleaned according to facility policy. 2. The convection ovens were soiled with baked on brown coloring on the glass doors making them opaque and not transparent. There were baked on debris on the interior corners of the units. The FSD acknowledged and stated, it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. The six-burner stove top and oven were not clean. The interior of the oven had food sediment and build up on the interior door. The catch tray that was lined with foil had burnt liquid, and food debris covering the entire tray and foil that was peeling. The FSD acknowledged and stated, it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 4. The griddle top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents that maintained a Personal Needs Account (PNA) a.) received a written notification when approaching the limit that could jeopardize a resident's eligibility for Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and b.) funds and final accounting of those funds were conveyed within 30 days of the resident's discharge or death to the proper jurisdiction.This deficient practice was identified for 12 of 13 residents (Resident #6, #39, #80, #159, #173, #186, #239, #241, #243, #245, #248 and #249) reviewed for PNA and was evidenced by: 1.) On [DATE] at 12:00 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the PNA balances as of [DATE]. A review of the facility's Trial Balance revealed 12 residents had balances that ranged from $1,964.18 to $39,870.91.On [DATE] at 10:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional Director of Finance (RDF) who stated that she was covering for the Finance Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a low-air-loss mattress was operating and set according to the resident's weight, as per a physician's order for a resident previously identified as being at risk for impaired skin integrity.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for positioning and mobility, and was evidenced by the following:On 8/8/2025 at 10:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 lying in bed awake. The mattress was noted to be inflated; however, the air loss mattress (a mattress used to prevent and treat pressure ulcers) was not on at that time. There was a piece of tape on the machine, with weight 235 pounds (lbs), written on it.On 8/13/2025 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor conducted a follow-up visit to the resident's room. Resident #7 was observed lying in bed and the air mattress was set to 250 lbs.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: obesity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an accurate account of the administration and documentation of controlled medications.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 nurses on 1 of 8 nursing units (2 D) reviewed during the medication administration and storage observation and was evidenced by the following: On 8/12/25 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administer six (6) medications to Resident #128 during the medication administration observation. When finished, the surveyor requested to review the Shift Count narcotic inventory log. The surveyor reviewed the Shift Count for the 8/12/25 for the 7 AM - 3 PM shift and noted that the designated area for Is Count Correct and EDK [Emergency Drug Kit] Sealed were not answered with a Yes or No response and both areas were blank. There were two illegible signatures in the area designated for the nurse's signature that was coming on duty and the nurse's signature for going off duty. The surveyor asked LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to comments/recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #185) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications and was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident #185's Order Summary Report (OSR) revealed a Physician's Order (PO) dated 4/9/25, for Fludrocortisone Acetate (used to treat certain conditions in which the adrenal glands (a gland) cannot make enough hormones such as Addison's Disease) Oral Tablet 0.1 milligrams (mg) (Fludrocortisone Acetate) Give one (1) tablet by mouth one time a day for Syndromes. The surveyor reviewed the diagnoses listed on the resident's OSR which failed to include a medical diagnosis of syndromes. A review of Resident #185's August 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the resident was ordered Fludrocortisone Acetate Oral Tablet 0.1 MG (Fludrocortisone Acetate) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Syndromes. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide quality care in accordance with physician orders for one Resident (R) 9) of three residents reviewed for outside appointments out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R9 had a gastric emptying scan as ordered. This had the potential for R9 and other residents to have medical issues related to missed procedures. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Consultations revised on 08/2019, provided by the Director of Nurses (DON) documented It is the policy of this organization to ensure all residents receive medical care in a timely manner . The attending physician will approve orders based on the consultant recommendations .The attending physician will be responsible for following up on the effects of recommended medications and treatments . Review of the admission Record under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) documented R9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C# NJ166810 C# NJ167847 C# NJ168096 Based on interview, document review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident (R) 6, R9, R25, and R30) of 31 sampled residents reviewed for abuse were free from resident-to-resident abuse perpetrated by R5. This had the potential to affect resident safety at the facility. Findings include: Review of R5's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of R5's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab, dated 05/07/24, indicated the resident had a history of behaviors such as making false accusations of assault or missing money, yelling at staff and residents, cursing, and aggression toward other residents. Review of R5's EMR annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/03/24 and located under the MDS tab, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C# NJ165261 C#NJ165932 C#NJ166156 C#NJ166810 C#NJ167718 C#167847 C#NJ168096 C#NJ168350 C#NJ168593 C#NJ171428 Based on interview, document review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility reported the results of their abuse/neglect investigations to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within five working days for 10 out of 13 residents (Resident (R) 3, R4, R5, R6, R9, R2, R11, R7, R31, R14) reviewed for abuse of 31 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to delay corrective measures and appropriate response to abuse allegations ensuring the safety of the residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R3's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of vascular dementia. Review of R3's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab, dated 02/19/18, indicated the resident had a history of behaviors such as screaming and cursing at staff. The Care Plan revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
C/O # NJ171057 Based on interview and review of the Nurse Staffing Report and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure to have sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to the residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by following: On 02/28/2024 at 10:30 AM surveyor #2 held a resident council meeting with 10 to 11 residents. Regarding the call bells, all in the group said the wait time was from 2 hours to 4.5 hours waiting for call bell to be answered, especially on evenings and night shift. They further stated, weekends horrible. 5 of 5 residents stated the delay in call bell response time caused a fall or incontinence episode. On 02/28/2024 at 12:05 PM surveyor #2 met with Resident #171 who stated that he/she constantly hears people calling for help. Resident #171 further stated that he/she hears call bells ringing for long periods of time. He/she thinks that staffing is a problem, and nobody wants to work at the facility. Resident #171 further stated his/her opinion is that the staff is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy and accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 4 of 4 medication carts observed on 4 of 4 nursing units and was evidenced by the following: Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 On 2/28/2024 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of a second state surveyor and a federal surveyor, interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #4), who stated nurses coming on duty along with the nurse going off duty are to count the narcotics in the medication cart together and sign the Shift Count log together to confirm the count is accurate and narcotics are accounted for. She confirmed there should be no missing documentation or blank sections for each shift change. At this point the surveyor, along with LPN #4, reviewed the medication cart and narcotic logs as well as the shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly store and secure medications and properly label opened multidose medications and b.) properly secure wound treatment carts when not attended. This deficient practice was observed in a.) 2 of 2 medication storage rooms and 4 of 4 medication carts on 4 of 4 nursing units reviewed for medication storage and labeling and in b.) 1 of 1 treatment carts observed during wound observation. This was evidenced by the following: Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 a.) On 02/28/2024 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of a second state surveyor and a federal surveyor, interviewed Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM #1), who stated all nurses are responsible to maintain the medication storage room's organization and cleanliness. She added that there should be no open medication containers in the storage room and any multidose medications that are stored in the medication room or refrigerator should be labeled and dated with the date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 On 02/27/2024 from 9:32 AM to 10:21 AM, the surveyors, accompanied the Director of Food Services (DOFS), observed the following in the kitchen: The surveyors observed a dietary aide (DA) in the kitchen. The DA had lengthy braids to mid shoulder and was observed wearing a baseball style hat. The braids extended past the shoulders and were exposed. The DA did not have a hair net in place and the hair was exposed. In the dry storage room, a can of corn on the 4 wheeled mobile can rack had a significant dent and a can of artichokes on a shelf had a significant dent on the seam. On interview the DOFS agreed that the cans should have been placed in the designated dented can area, In the dessert and juice refrigerator the surveyors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ169732 Complaint #NJ170765 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) provide a homelike dining experience on 1 of 2 units, (2nd floor), and b) maintain the facility and equipment in clean and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units, (1st and 2nd floor) and was evidenced by the following: Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 a.) During the initial tour of the 2nd floor on 02/27/2024 12:22 PM, Surveyor #1observed the nurse pass the first tray and no placemats observed on the trays. There were no tablecloths on the tables. All food and drinks were left on the tray for all residents and not placed directly on the tables. On 02/28/2024 at 12:05 PM, the 1st meal truck arrived at the dining room/patient lounge on the 2nd floor. Resident meals were observed being served on trays and not placed directly on the tables. During an interview with the surveyor on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility allowed Non-Certified Nursing Aides (NAs) to continue working as an NA after the specified 120 days from date of hire. This deficient practice was identified for 7 NAs, (NA1, NA2, NA3, NA4, NA5, NA6, NA7) during the NA review. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health memo dated [DATE], sent to Nursing Homes included the following: Facilities are advised as follows: II. Nurse Aides Nurse Aides (not TNAs) who are enrolled in a NATCEP program must finish training and pass the nurse-aide written or oral exam and the State approved clinical skills competency exam within the usual 120 days, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 8:39-43.10. After completing the first 16 hours of training, the nurse aide may work in a nursing home while completing the training and testing. After the surveyor review of NA files provided by the facility, on [DATE] at 12:50 PM the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide all the items that were on the corporate menu. This deficient practice occurred during one breakfast meal that was observed on the first floor and was evidenced by the following: Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/22/2022 1. On 02/28/2024 at 09:24 AM, Resident #146 had not received their breakfast tray at that time. Resident #146 stated that they usually receive breakfast between 9-9:15 AM. The meal cart arrived on the unit at (9:30 AM and Resident #146 received his/her tray at 9:34 AM.) Resident #146 received scrambled eggs, bagel (whole) with cream cheese, an 8-ounce (oz) skim milk, 6 oz coffee, cold cereal portion control, a small muffin, and 4 oz orange juice. The facility menu provided to the survey team from the Director of Food Services (DOFS) revealed the following meal was to be served at breakfast on 2/28/2024: 4 fl oz (fluid ounce) Cranberry Juice, 6 fl oz Oatmeal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ00171057 Repeat deficiency from recertification survey of 09/20/2022 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently serve foods at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2024 at 12:14 PM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #146 stated that the food has improved but we need more variety, and the portions are small. Resident stated that meal trays arrive between 12:15 and 12:45, you never know. Sometimes food is cold, not what menu says is received. On 2/28/2024 at 10:30 AM, during the resident council meeting 8 of 8 residents attending the resident council meeting complained of cold food to the surveyor. On 02/28/2024 at 09:13 AM, the surveyor observed residents plates on a pellet covered with the bottom of another pellet. On 02/28/2024 at 09:24 AM, Resident #146 had not received his/her breakfast tray. Resident stated that they usually receive breakfast between 9-9:15 AM. Resident stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) donn (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering an isolation room to prevent the transmission of infection 2.) maintain proper infection control practices while performing wound care and 3.) maintain proper infection control practices during the dining observation. This deficient practice was identified for: 1.) 1 of 3 residents (Resident #645) on transmission-based precautions, 2.) 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care (Resident #126), and 3.) 1 of 3 dining rooms observed for meals (first floor dining room). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/28/2024 at 12:33 PM, Surveyor #1 observed a Contact Precautions sign at Resident #645's doorway. Instructions on the sign included, but were not limited to: Everyone must clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also: put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the medical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was dressed appropriately while in common areas of the unit and did not expose him/herself to other residents as well as failed to transport a resident from one area of the facility to another in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 48 sampled residents reviewed for dignity, (Resident # 89) and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the 2nd floor on 02/27/2024 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #89 in Activity room/patient lounge on the 2nd floor in a reclining Geri chair. Resident #89 was dressed in a hospital gown, pulled up and his/her brief exposed to room. 10 other residents were in the room along with activity staff. An unidentified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) walked in the room looked at resident and left the room without covering him/her with the blanket. On 02/27/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #89 was pushed forward in the Geri chair out of lounge and put in hallway. Gown was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the most recent State of New Jersey inspection results in a place readily accessible to the residents, families, and the public. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2024 at 09:00 AM, during initial entrance to the facility the surveyor observed the State Results Binder on a small table next to the reception desk. There was a set of double doors between the lobby and a hallway which led to the nursing units. The doors were locked and required a four-digit code to open the doors to enter the nursing units or to exit back to the entrance lobby, where the binder was located. On 02/28/2024 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor held a Resident Council meeting with 10 residents. During the meeting the surveyor asked the residents if they were aware of the survey results and the location. Ten of the ten residents told the surveyor they were not aware of the results being accessible to them or a location where they can view the results. On 03/04/2024 at 2:10 PM, the surveyor met with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of a resident's health related information. This deficient practice was identified at 1 of 2 nursing stations and was evidenced by the following: On 03/01/2024 at 12:26 PM, at the 2nd floor nursing station, the surveyor observed a medication cart unattended with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) opened to full view, exposing a resident's personal identification which include the following information: The resident's name, photo, date of birth , medical diagnoses, allergies, diet, and medications. The MAR was displayed on a fixed laptop attached to the top of the medication cart located at the nursing station across from hallway C. The medication cart was locked. On 03/01/24 at 12:29 PM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #5) returned to her cart. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN #5 who stated, I didn't realize I didn't lock the screen. I should have hidden the screen, I didn't realize. When asked what she should have done, she replied, I should always lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide information and educate residents on the grievance process. This was deficient practice was identified for 10 of 10 residents interviewed (Resident #9, 26, 46, 75, 82, 86, 125, 166, 172, and 446)) on the grievance process during a Resident Council meeting conducted on 02/28/2024 at 10:30 AM and was evidenced by the following: On 02/28/2024 at 10:30 AM, during the resident council meeting with ten alert and oriented residents, the surveyor asked the residents if they were aware of what a grievance was and how to file a grievance with the facility if necessary. Ten of the ten residents present during the meeting told the surveyor they did not know the definition of a grievance or how to file a grievance or formal complaint in writing. When the surveyor reviewed the resident council meeting minutes for November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024, prior to having the resident council meeting, the minutes did not include education on the grievance process being provided to the residents. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) one was completed accurately for a newly admitted resident. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR (Resident #150) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2024 at 10:09 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the resident was sitting in the bed with eyes opened. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident #150 had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to :dementia, psychotic disorder (a mental illness), aphasia (inability to express self verbally). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 08/04/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 00 meaning the resident was unable to complete the interview due to severe cognitive impairment. On 02/28/2024 at 09:45 AM, the facility provided the surveyor with a PASARR one that was completed by the transferring acute care facility prior to entering the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical needs and failed to implement focus and interventions that are specific to the resident's catheter care and respiratory diagnosis. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident # 48) for catheter care and of 2 Residents (Resident #170) for respiratory diagnosis, investigated for care plans. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/27/2024 at 10:43 AM during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident # 48 sitting in the dining room. Resident # 48 was observed to have a indwelling catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder) in a blue privacy bag. On 02/29/2024 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 48 lying in bed. The indwelling catheter was observed in a blue privacy bag attached to the bed frame.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan for a resident following a hospitalization and change in condition. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 48 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #80) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2024 at 09:22 AM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #80 was observed in bed with eyes open. The surveyor did not observe a feeding pump or feeding tube supplies in the resident's room. Resident #80 told the surveyor that he/she used to have a feeding tube when they were admitted to the facility, but no longer had a feeding tube and tolerated a regular diet. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #80 had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease (disorder of the central nervous system), failure to thrive, and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/21/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice, specifically by not providing a resident a medication that was available in the automated medication dispenser and failing to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident # 124 & # 170) investigated for Services Provided to Meet Professional Standards. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with decreased range of motion and mobility received prescribed treatments to prevent contractures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #112) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 02/27/2024 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #112 lying in bed awake. The resident's left hand was contracted (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity or rigidity of joints) and a right hand deformity was noted. When interviewed the resident stated that he/she had a brace somewhere that staff put on once in a while. The resident further stated that he/she wanted to have it on more frequently. The resident's family member was present and agreed with the resident's statement and expressed a desire for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a urinary catheter and provide services in a manner consistent with standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident #80). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2024 at 09:22 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #80 was observed in bed with eyes open. The surveyor observed a urinary drainage bag hanging on the left side of the bed facing towards the doorway of the residents' room. The drainage bag was not in a privacy bag, meaning the bag did not have a cover to conceal the contents. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #80 had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease (disorder of the central nervous system), and obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract due to obstructed urinary flow). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/21/24 revealed the resident had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their own policy for storage of respiratory equipment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 (Resident #154) residents reviewed for respiratory concerns and was evidenced by the following: During a tour of the facility on 02/27/2024 at 09:58 AM, Resident #154 was observed in bed. On 02/29/2024 at 03:19 PM, the surveyor observed the nebulizer machine (a nebulizer machine delivers aerosol medication to the person via a mouthpiece and chamber/cup that holds the medication, via tubing that is attached to the machine. It is used to treat respiratory conditions such as COPD, bronchitis, and asthma.) on an overbed table. The surveyor observed the tubing and mouthpiece of the nebulizer machine exposed to air and uncovered. At that time, the surveyor observed moisture in the chamber of the mouthpiece that was attached to the tubing. On 03/01/2024 at 08:09 AM, the surveyor observed the tubing and mouthpiece of the nebulizer machine exposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's prescribed dietary supplement and preferences were accurately identified and implemented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for dining services. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/24 from 11:59 AM to 12:49 PM, the surveyor observed dining services in the first floor main dining room. At 12:19 PM, The surveyor observed a Dietary Aide (DA) as she called out for a condiment cart after the resident's meals had already been served and the residents had begun to eat their meals. The surveyor observed Resident #25's meal ticket and noted that the resident had not received creamer for his/her coffee, salt, pepper and a health shake (dietary supplement). When interviewed at that time, the resident stated that he/she needed assistance to get creamer for their coffee and salt and pepper. The resident was accompanied by another unsampled resident. On 02/27/24 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00165456 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/20/23, 10/24/23, and 10/26/23, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a newly admitted resident who experienced pain. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #2, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #2: According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, opioid abuse, cocaine abuse, and muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size). Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00168282, NJ00168313 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to update a comprehensive care plan for a resident who had a life-threatening event. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #3, 1 of 4 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans and was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on [DATE] at 12:23 PM, Resident #3 stated that they overdosed on fentanyl (a synthetic opioid) twice at the facility within the last few months. The resident stated that facility staff used Narcan (opioid overdose treatment) on him/her and that they were sent out to the hospital after each overdose. According to the admission Record, Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to poisoning by other drugs, medicaments (substance used as medicine) and biological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00165456 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/20/23, 10/24/23, and 10/26/23, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #2, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #2: Review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size). Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility had insufficient staffing in the kitchen to carry out the duties of the food service operations competently. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Cross-reference: F 760, F803, F804, F809 and F812 On 08/30/22 at approximately 10:00 AM, during the initial brief tour of the kitchen, the surveyor questioned the Director of Food Services (DOFS) why the kitchen staff were still assembling breakfast trays at 10:00 AM. The DOFS explained, We are normally done breakfast tray line by 9 AM. I had to call in (2) staff and borrow a cook from a sister facility. Staffing has been an issue for the month I've been here. It is slowing and affecting our production. On 08/30/22 at 11:24 AM, the surveyor observed CNA #3 assisting resident #92 with the breakfast meal at 11:24 AM. The surveyor asked CNA #3 if that was breakfast or lunch. CNA #3 stated, It's breakfast. They didn't send a puree tray and we had to wait for another. We get the trays based on how many people show up to work in the kitchen. On 09/01/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that staff were following the menu over multiple meal observations which affected all residents of the facility and b) failed to obtain approval of menu substitutions in accordance with facility policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 08/30/22 at 11:24 AM, Surveyor #1 observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #3) assisting resident #92 with the breakfast meal. The surveyor asked CNA #3 if that was the breakfast or lunch meal. CNA #3 stated, It's breakfast. They didn't send a puree tray and we had to wait for another. According to the admission Record, Resident #92 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including but not limited to: Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. According to the interdisciplinary care plan for Resident #92, Resident #92 was care planned for a nutrition problem: Related to Lewy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to serve meals at regular times in a manner that meets the residents needs for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #92 and Resident #74) observed during mealtime. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Cross reference F760, F802 1. On 08/30/22 at 11:24 AM, while on the initial tour of the facility on the 2nd floor, the surveyor observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #3) assisting Resident #92 with eating his/her meal at 11:24 AM. The surveyor asked CNA #3 if that was the breakfast or lunch meal. CNA #3 responded, It's breakfast. They didn't send a puree tray and we had to wait for another. We get the trays based on how many people show up to work in the kitchen. According to Resident #92's admission Record, Resident #92 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, aphasia (an inability to comprehend or formulate language), mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and need for assistance with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/30/22 from 09:18 AM to 10:08 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Food Service (DOFS), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On a middle shelf of a multi-tiered rack in the dry storage room a Styrofoam cup without a lid contained an unidentified liquid. The cup had not been labeled or dated. The DOFS stated, That doesn't belong there. 2. On a middle shelf (2) gallon containers of Fresh Kosher Chips had a received date of 6/24/21. The inside of the plastic gallon jug appeared to have a green/black mold and there was unidentified white debris surrounding the upper neck below the lid of the jug internally and unidentified debris externally. The DOFS stated, I would agree they appear to have mold. I'm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently revise and/or update resident care plans for 2 of 38 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #62) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record, Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of brain, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and muscle weakness. Review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/14/2022, revealed staff identified Resident #6 as severely cognitively impaired, with no behaviors, required total assist of one staff for bed mobility and dressing and was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of an Inservice Form for Resident #6's palm protector (a type of splinting that provides a barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently complete neurological evaluations (neuro checks) after unwitnessed falls for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #189) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/31/22 at 11:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #189 resting comfortably in bed with the head of bed (HOB) slightly elevated. The surveyor observed floor mats positioned on both sides of the resident's bed. According to the admission Record, Resident #39 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissue) and dementia. Review of Resident #189's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 07/24/22, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 05, which indicated that the resident's cognition was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the application of a palm protector (a type of splinting that provides a barrier between the fingers and the palm to prevent injury to the palm from finger contracture) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #62) reviewed for positioning and mobility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During tour of the 2B unit on 08/30/22 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed with the head of bed (HOB) elevated. The surveyor observed that Resident #6 had limitation to the left hand and did not have on a palm protector. When interviewed, Resident #6 was unable to provide any information about his/her care. The Hospice Certified Nurse Assistant (Hospice CNA) was present in the room and stated the resident required total assistance with activities of daily living. According to the admission Record, Resident #6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) follow professional standards of nursing practice by administering expired insulin medication and b.) ensure that insulin medication was administered to residents within an appropriate time frame according to physician's order and manufacturer specifications. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 35 sampled residents, (Residents #12, #93, #182 and #168) reviewed for the administration of insulin (a medication used for Diabetes) during medication administration and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/07/22 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2), observed within the 2C Wing medication cart, one opened box of Insulin Lispro (Humalog) 100 unit/milliliter (ml) inside a plastic bag for Resident #12. The box was labeled with an opened date of 08/02/22. At that time LPN #2 stated that Resident #12 only received insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an orderly and sanitary environment by leaving garbage bags, a spill, gowns, linens, and unpackaged incontinence briefs in the hallway of B unit. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 wings (B Wing) on the first floor and was evidenced by the following: On 8/31/22 at 10:26 AM, in the B Wing, the surveyor observed two trash bags filled with garbage unattended on the floor. The surveyor also observed linen with unpackaged incontinence briefs left on top of a plastic supply bin in the hallway. Further, the surveyor observed another opened bag of incontinence briefs on a chair in the hallway. On 09/01/22 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor observed a red trash bin used for personal protective equipment (PPE) (equipment such as, but not limited to gowns, gloves, and eye protection worn to create a barrier from pathogens) overflowing with pieces of used gowns. The surveyor also observed an opened package of incontinence briefs on a chair and towels left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) a.) an allegation of physical and verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #134) reviewed for abuse and b.) an unwitnessed event resulting in major injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/01/22, the surveyor requested the personnel files for five employees hired within the last four months. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8's personnel file revealed an Employee Warning Record (EWR), dated 08/02/22, that included a conduct violation with a violation date of 07/31/22 at 11:00 AM in Resident #134's room. Further review of the EWR revealed [Resident #134] stated that [CNA #8] was mean and degrading. CNA called resident nasty and refused to place resident on toilet, and pulled resident's arm and [Resident #134] was scared that CNA was going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical and verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #134) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/01/22, the surveyor requested the personnel files for five employees hired within the last four months. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8's personnel file revealed an Employee Warning Record (EWR), dated 08/02/22, that included a conduct violation with a violation date of 07/31/22 at 11:00 AM in Resident #134's room. Further review of the EWR revealed [Resident #134] stated that [CNA #8] was mean and degrading. CNA called resident nasty and refused to place resident on toilet, and pulled resident's arm and [Resident #134] was scared that CNA was going to break [his/her] arm. Resident was in tears and had to be calmed down by staff. The EWR was signed by the Director of Nursing (DON). On 09/06/22 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 lying in bed. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #208) reviewed for expired resident and was evidenced by the following: Within 14 days after the facility determines or should have determined that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition, a SCSA/MDS must be completed. (For purpose of this section, a significant change is a decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related interventions, that has an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status, and requires interdisciplinary review or revision of the care plan, or both.) Review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #208 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow a physician's order for bilateral side rail pads for one resident, 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for accidents. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During tour of the 2B unit on 08/30/22 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed with the head of bed (HOB) and bilateral half side rails elevated. The surveyor observed that Resident #6 was leaning to the right side and there was no padding to either side rail. When interviewed, Resident #6 was unable to provide any information about his/her care. According to the admission Record, Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of brain, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and muscle weakness. Review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/14/2022, revealed staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to facilitate the flow of urine) had physician orders for the care of the catheter. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #136) reviewed for catheters. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/30/22 at 10:27 AM, during the initial tour of the 1st floor, the surveyor observed Resident #136 in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed a urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the bed frame. The catheter drainage bag was also observed on 08/31/22 and 09/01/22. A review of Resident #136's electronic medical record (EMAR) under Diagnosis revealed a diagnosis of but not limited to, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). A review of Resident #136's most recent Minimal Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/28/22, revealed Resident #136 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control measures for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (Resident # 10 and Resident # 180). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/06/22 at 12:29 PM, Surveyor #1 observed the mouthpiece, chamber, and tubing of Resident #10's nebulizer propped in an upright position by the machine. The mouthpiece, chamber, and tubing was not contained in a bag and was exposed to the surrounding environment. A nebulizer machine delivers aerosol medication to the person via a mouthpiece and chamber/cup that holds the medication, via tubing that is attached to the machine. It is used to treat respiratory conditions such as COPD, bronchitis, asthma etc. On 09/08/22 at 8:04 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the mouthpiece, chamber and tubing of Resident #10's nebulizer draped over the nebulizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order to monitor the dialysis access site and failed to ensure the dialysis transfer forms of ongoing records of communication between the facility and dialysis center were consistently completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis care, (Resident #119). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 09/06/22 at 9:21 AM, Resident #119 said he/she goes to dialysis on Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF). Resident #199 went on to say that he/she gets dialysis through a catheter in right chest as the shunt is not ready for use. According to the admission record Resident #119 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, End Stage Renal Disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to supervise the administration of medication for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/06/22 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 lying in bed. There was a medicine cup with pills in it on the resident's over-the-bed table. When asked about the medicine cup, the resident stated the nurse left the medication at the bedside because the resident was waiting for his/her breakfast tray before taking the medications. During an interview with the surveyor on 09/06/22 at 9:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 stated she completed the morning medication pass for her assignment. She further stated that the medication administration process included making sure the resident swallowed their medications before leaving the resident's room because sometimes they can choke, or drop the medication, and that medication should not be left with the resident. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure expired and discontinued medications were removed from active inventory and medications were appropriately labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 11:40 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2), observed the following within the 2C Wing medication cart: -One opened box of Insulin Lispro (Humalog) 100 unit/milliliter (ml) located inside a plastic bag for Resident #12. The box was labeled with an opened date of [DATE]. At that time LPN #2 stated that Resident #12 only received insulin when needed because he/she was on a sliding scale (received insulin depending on the blood sugar level) and that insulin had an expiration date of 30 days once opened. -Incruse Ellipta Aerosol Powder Inhalation Powder 62.5 micrograms (mcg) (used to treat asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently serve foods at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Cross Reference F 802 On 08/30/22 at approximately 10:05 AM, the surveyor conducted the initial tour of the kitchen. The surveyor questioned the Director of Food Services (DOFS) why the kitchen staff were still assembling breakfast trays at 10:00 AM. The DOFS explained, We are normally done breakfast tray line by 9 AM. I had to call in (2) staff who were scheduled off today and borrow a cook from our sister facility. Staffing has been an issue for the month I've been here. It is slowing and affecting our production. On 09/01/22 at 10:22 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the DOFS to determine why the breakfast trays were late to arrive on the 2-C unit, as per the meal delivery schedule provided to the surveyor on entrance. The surveyor questioned the DOFS if trays had arrived late because the kitchen was short of staff,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) (equipment such as, but not limited to gowns, gloves, and eye protection worn to protect the wearer from the spread of infection or illness) was used appropriately and failed to ensure handwashing was performed before and after exiting and entering resident rooms that were on isolation and between changing gloves. The deficient practice was observed on 1 of 4 units on the first floor. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/30/22 at 10:17 AM during the initial tour, the surveyor observed a resident room with a transmission-based precaution sign (notification sign that specific precautions must be followed prior to entering or leaving the room) that revealed, ISOLATION DROPLET/CONTACT PRECAUTIONS Everyone Must: including visitors, doctors, and staff Clean hands when entering and leaving the room, Wear mask, Wear eye protections, Gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ00164862, NJ00165456, NJ00168282, NJ00168313, NJ00168836 Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/20/23, 10/24/23, 10/26/23, and 11/09/23 it was determined that facility staff failed to consistently document on the Documentation Survey Report, the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the residents. In addition, the facility staff failed to follow the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation-CNA for Resident #1, #2, #3, and #5, 4 of 5 residents reviewed for documentation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of diseases that case airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hearing loss, bilateral (both sides), anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAGLER, DARYL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/28/2012 |
| GOLDMAN, NATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| HENDRIX, HEIDI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| LANTZITSKY, AHARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ROZENBERG, KENNETH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CONTI, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/14/2017 |
| GREENBERG, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2024 |
| ABRAMCHIK, AMIR | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2011 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $195K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315174. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.