Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 197.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This was evident for one out of five residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 05/12/2026 at 2:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was called to Resident #1's room and the resident indicated Certified Nursing Assistant #1 hit them after they spit on them (unwitnessed). Certified Nursing Assistant #1 refused to leave the room and continued providing care, and then Resident #1 spat and kicked Certified Nursing Assistant #1 who in turn hit the resident on the right side of the face and covered their mouth with a washcloth. Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse Unit Manager #1 with redness on their right cheek and complaints of pain and was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation on 05/12/2026. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings are:The facility's policy titled Abuse, dated 07/18/2025 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications (Resident #4), out of a sample of 37 residents investigated. Specifically, Resident #4 had a physician's order to notify the physician when Resident's finger stick blood sugar (method of drawing drops of blood from the finger for testing the blood glucose level) result is less than 80 milligrams per deciliter or more than 300 milligrams per deciliter. Licensed Practical Nurse #3 failed to notify the physician when Resident #4's finger stick blood sugar was higher than 300 milligrams per deciliter on 12/02/2025, 12/11/2025, 12/12/2025, and 12/13/2025.The findings include: The facility's policy titled Diabetes Mellitus, Management with a creation date of 07/15/2025 documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for two (2) (4th and 5th Floor) of five (5) units observed during medication administration. Specifically, 1.) An expired one (1) liter bag of dextrose intravenous solution and an open undated bottle of liquid hydromorphone was found in the 4th Floor medication storage room. 2.) The 5th Floor medication cart contained expired arginine powder. 3.) The 4th Floor medication cart contained multiple open and undated eye drops and liquid medications.The findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Storage, revised [DATE], documented the facility will store medications safely and securely and in a manner that maintains the integrity of the product in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, current standards of practice and federal and state regulations. Expired, discontinued and or contaminated medications will be removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1.) Infection prevention and control practices were not maintained during residents' meal service. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) units observed during dining. 2.) The resident's clean laundry was observed hanging in a cart without a cover in the lobby and on the 3rd Floor unit. The findings include: 1. The facility policy and procedure titled Use of Gloves - Food Service dated 04/2017, last revised 04/2021 documented that vinyl or latex gloves will be worn when handling foods that will not be further cooked to ensure microorganisms are not transferred from food handler's hands to the food product served. Anytime a gloved hand touches a contaminated surface, the glove must be changed. On 12/15/2025 at 12:28 PM, Dietary Aide #1 was observed using gloved hand to pick up a cover that fell on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. This was evident on the 4th Floor dining room. Specifically, a live cockroach was sighted crawling on the pantry counter near the ice machine where food and beverages were placed during lunch. In addition, the facility's pest control service record documented numerous cockroach sightings on the 4th Floor Unit.The findings include but are not limited to:The Facility Policy titled Pest Control dated 11/2022 documented that the facility shall maintain an ongoing effective pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of pests and rodents. Pest control services are provided through contract with an approved pest control provider. Pest control service visit documentation will be kept on file in the facility.On 12/15/2025 at 11:55 AM, during lunch dining observation a medium sized (1/2 inch) one half inch live cockroach was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 (two) hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident for 1 (one) (Resident #11) of 2 (two) residents reviewed for abuse out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 10/20/2025, Resident #11 alleged that Certified Nursing Assistant #2 told them I heard you like to have your balls rubbed. Resident #11 felt that this was inappropriate. The alleged incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. The findings are:The facility's policy titled Abuse which was last revised on 07/18/2025 documented that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (one) (Resident #11) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 10/20/2025, Resident #11's family member alleged that on 10/19/2025, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 allegedly made an inappropriate remark towards Resident #11 that offended the resident. The facility initiated the investigation but did not thoroughly investigate the allegation. The facility failed to interview other staff on the unit who may have potentially witnessed the alleged incident. Cross Reference F-tag 609 The findings are:The facility's policy titled Abuse last revised 07/18/2025 documented that the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including but not limited to staff, family, friends and residents of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #9) of two (2) residents reviewed for position and mobility out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #9 who had a right-hand contracture, was not provided with a right palm guard as per rehabilitation recommendations.The findings are:The facility policy titled Adaptive Equipment with a revised date of 01/20/2025 documented the Rehabilitation Department will recommend safe and appropriate adaptive equipment used to enhance Activities of daily living, safety, quality of life and independence. The facility will provide adaptive equipment and appropriate assistance to assure that the resident can use the adaptive device properly. Recommendations to the resident's care plan and Certified Nursing Assistance Kardex should be provided as indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident received necessary respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #159) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory care out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #159 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula without a physician's order. The findings are:The facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy Administration revised 09/17/2025 documented oxygen therapy is administered by licensed nurses or respiratory therapists in accordance with healthcare provider orders and in accordance with the state scope of practice and nurse practice act.Resident #159 had diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and Influenza.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #159 had severely impaired cognition and received oxygen therapy.On 12/17/2025 at 10:37 AM and 12/18/2025 at 9:58 AM, Resident #159 was observed with Oxygen in use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including treatments at each visit. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #159) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory care out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #159 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. A review of interdisciplinary progress notes revealed that Resident #159 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula, however, there was no attending practitioner's orders and indication for oxygen use.Cross refer to F-tag 695 The findings are:The facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy Administration revised 09/17/2025 documented oxygen therapy is administered by licensed nurses or respiratory therapists in accordance with healthcare provider orders and in accordance with the state scope of practice and nurse practice act.Resident #159 had diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and Influenza.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 7/10/2023 to 07/14/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity. This was evident for 2 (Resident #21 and #107) of 35 total sampled resident. Specifically, staff were observed standing over Resident #21 and Resident #107 while feeding them. The findings are: The facility policy titled Meal Assistance dated 3/2019 documented residents receive assistance with meals in a manner that meet the individual needs of each resident. Staff shall not be standing over residents while assisting them with meals. On 07/12/2023 at 12:13 PM, the lunch meal was observed in the 3rd Floor dining room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 was observed standing over Resident #21 while feeding them their lunch from the meal tray. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was observed standing over Resident #107 while feeding them their lunch from their meal tray. On 07/12/2023 at 12:30 PM, CNA #3 was interviewed and stated it is more convenient for both the resident and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY