No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare

43 N White Horse Pike, Hammonton, NJ 08037 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 240 certified beds · (609) 567-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 567-3100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jan 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2 Sindoni Lane · (609) 561-8500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
129 N White Horse Pike # 1 · (800) 984-1014 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ShopRite0.4 mi
80 S White Horse Pike · (609) 704-7609 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Linda Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
642 Bellevue Ave · (609) 561-7217

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.5%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.3%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.6%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.4%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.5%8.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.232.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.571.111.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.1%CMS range 38.7–58.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
58.4%
Total nursing turnover
51.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 218.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-12)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to complete a.) reference checks on employees before their start date for 38 of 77 employee files reviewed; b.) a check of the appropriate licensing boards and registries for 8 of 77 employee files; and c.) a criminal background checks for 6 of 77 employee files.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: From 1/7/26 through 1/12/26, the survey team reviewed the facilities' new employee files and identified the following: a.) Employee #1 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 2/10/25; there was no evidence of a reference check prior to the start of employment.Employee # 4 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 8/26/24; there was no evidence of a reference check prior to the start of employment.Employee #5 was hired as an Activities Aide on 9/11/25; there was no evidence of a reference check prior to the start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/2026 at 9:30 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Assistant Director (AD) and the Assistant Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (ALNHA), observed the following in the kitchen:Upon entry to the kitchen the surveyor observed that the baseboard tile molding was missing from the diet office doorway and extending into the kitchen area towards the service line. Observation of the juice box temperature log revealed that temperatures had been recorded daily, up to and including the AM temperature on 1/5/2026. Observation of the interior of the juice box revealed that there was not an internal thermometer to measure temperature. When interviewed, the AD told the surveyor that he was not aware that they needed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program, including ongoing monitoring and surveillance for 12 of 12 months and utilization of the infection assessment tool for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #106, #144, #175) reviewed for antibiotics This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/7/2026 at 1:15 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP), during the interview, a request was made for evidence of the antibiotic tracking log for January 2025 through January 2026.At that time, the IP provided the surveyor with the Infection Control Binder, which did not include any evidence that the antibiotics were being tracked for all twelve months of 2025 to present. She then confirmed that she did not have the tracking logs for 2025. The IP stated that she assumed the role of IP in October of 2025, and she was not doing the tracking, and had no knowledge of any tracking being completed prior to October 2025. The IP confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to document weekly skin assessments for a resident with a history of pressure ulcers; b.) consistently implement pressure relieving interventions in accordance with the facility policy and professional standards of nursing practice.This deficient practice was identified for 2 (two) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #8 and #199) and was evidenced by the following:a.) A review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #199 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, anxiety and major depressive disorder. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care, dated 9/30/25, included the resident was dependent with all aspect of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the correct menu items in accordance with their weekly cycle menu for 5 residents observed during the lunch meal on 1/6/2026 as indicated on a meal ticket. This deficient practice was identified for 5 (five) of 12 residents (Resident #22, #46, #92, #179, #214) reviewed during the dining observation and was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident #22's admission Record (AR-an admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and cerebral palsy. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care, dated 11/1/25, indicated that the resident was on a mechanically altered diet. A review of the physician's orders reflected an order dated 9/25/25, indicated the resident was to receive an Advanced Mechanical soft diet, soft texture. A review of Resident #92's AR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and home-like environment for 1 of 4 nursing units (1C), reviewed for environment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/12/2026 at 9:02 AM, the surveyor went to Resident #180's room to conduct an interview with them. When the resident sat upright, a large brown embedded stain was noted on the resident's fitted sheet.At that time, the resident stated that the stain was there when they received the fitted sheet. They further stated that on occasions, they received linens with holes.On 1/12/2026 at 9:19 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1 observed the first floor, C-hall clean linen cart. The surveyor observed there a washcloth with multiple large red stains and two reddish-brown particles on it stored on the clean linen cart. There was also a fitted sheet with a golf ball-sized hole in it. LPN/UM #1 immediately removed the items from the cart.It was further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 1 of 56 residents (Resident #184) reviewed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/5/2026 at 10:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #184 in the bed with a C-PAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine that helps treat sleep apnea (a sleeping disorder in which temporary cessation of breathing occurs) on their nightstand next to them. The C-PAP mask was uncovered and touched the surface of the nightstand.At that time, Resident #184 stated that they last used their C-PAP machine one day last week, and they also used it a couple of times per week.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had a diagnosis which included, but was not limited to, anemia (a condition marked by a deficiency of red blood cells or of hemoglobin in the blood).The admission summary did not include a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (when you stop breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper foot care that included treatment to prevent complications, including but not limited to, following up with podiatry (foot doctor) recommendations. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #164) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was evidenced by the following:1.On 1/5/26 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #8 who was fully dressed and was seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. The resident stated that they had a wound on their left foot that may have resulted from their boot.On 1/7/26 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 who stated that she was assigned to Resident #8. When the surveyor asked if the resident had any wounds she stated that the resident had no wounds. CNA #1 further stated that the resident needed help to dress and when transferred required total assistance from staff.On 1/7/26 the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure necessary services and assistance, specifically incontinent care, was provided to a dependent resident (Resident #199) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for bladder incontinence and b.) ensure that a resident's urinary catheter bag was covered with a privacy bag to maintain the resident's dignity. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident # 14) reviewed for urinary catheter.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:a.) On 1/9/2026 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor completed a facility wide incontinence rounds. The surveyor requested Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 and another staff member to announce and request permission to see Resident #199's brief. CNA #4 indicated that the resident was on hospice and was cognitively impaired. CNA #4 proceeded to knock on the door and guided Resident #199 as they revealed what appeared to be a urine saturated brief, that had seeped up the back of their incontinence brief. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain weekly weights according to a physician's order, and b.) obtain re-weights according to the facility's policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/2026 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 in their room seated in a wheelchair beside their bed, dressed and groomed. Resident #7 stated they were vegetarian and wanted better food, like fresh fruits and vegetables. Resident #7 also stated they had lost a lot of weight since admission to the facility.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that Resident #7 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, anxiety, type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition in which the body does not make enough insulin or does not use insulin properly leading to high blood sugar (glucose) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). A Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a.) respiratory equipment was stored in an appropriate way to prevent the spread of infection, and b) a physician's order (PO) was obtained for necessary treatment for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #110 and #184) reviewed for respiratory care.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/5/2026 at 10:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #184 in the bed with a C-PAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine (a common treatment for sleep apnea that uses pressurized air delivered through a mask to keep your airway open during sleep, improving breathing, and overall health by preventing pauses in breathing which consisted of a motor, a hose, and a mask (nasal or full-face) that delivers a steady stream of air) on the nightstand next to them. The C-PAP mask was uncovered and touched the surface of the nightstand.At that time, Resident #184 stated that they last used their C-PAP one day last week, and they typically used it a couple of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 forms) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 5 of 5 forms reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/9/25 at 2:09 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed on five of the five provided forms Part 5, had not been completed upon receipt of the medications from the provider pharmacy as instructed on the reverse of the ordering form. The forms were as follows: Order form #240870463 dated 3/11/25 #240870454 dated 5/27/25 #250798148 dated 7/31/25 #250798149 dated 9/5/25 #250798150 dated 10/15/25 - Part 5 was not completed with the number of items received and the date they were received On 1/12/2026 10:00 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated the process for completing the DEA 222 form entailed that the DON filled in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: follow appropriate infection control practices by having necessary personal protection equipment (PPE) readily available for a resident who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for infection control and was evidenced by the following: This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/9/26 at 11:18 AM, the surveyor knocked on Resident #55's closed door, at that time the surveyor observed a sign posted outside of Resident #55's door that revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions, once inside the room, the surveyor observed the resident seated in a wheelchair, hair disheveled and the resident smelled of smoke. When the surveyor asked the resident if the staff wore a gown and gloves while caring for them, Resident #55 stated, I don't know. The surveyor did not observe any PPE (personal protective equipment-Clothing or equipment worn to protect one from injury or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) document the administration of the influenza vaccine after signed consent was obtained for one (Resident #41) of five sampled residents; b) ensure the provision of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were properly offered to a resident with impaired cognition for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/6/2025 at 12:42 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 walking in the hallway and yelling. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed Resident #6 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. A review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/8/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/01/24, 11/04/24, and 11/06/24, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Administrator ensured that two staff that were currently working as Assistant Administrators were licensed as Nursing Home Administrators (NHA) per the facility's Job Description for Assistant Nursing Home Administrator. On 11/01/24, at 10:20 AM, the surveyor completed the entrance conference with Assistant Administrator (AA) #1, who stated that he had worked at the facility for 2.5 months. On 11/01/24, at 2:20 PM, Surveyor #1 requested a copy of Nursing Home license from AA #1 and AA #2. AA #1 stated that he was licensed in New York and not in New Jersey. AA #2 stated that he did not have a Nursing Home Administrator License. Both AA #1 and AA #2 stated that their job titles at the facility were Assistant Nursing Home Administrator. On 11/01/24, at 2:43 PM, AA #1 verified that he is a licensed Administrator in New York, and not in New Jersey. A copy of the license was provided for review. Surveyor #2 reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #: NJ00179283 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/01/24, 11/04/24, and 11/06/24, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) for a resident that included action taken by staff to educate the resident regarding alternatives and consequences. The facility also failed to follow its Care Plans - Comprehensive policy. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for CP and was evidenced by the following: On 11/06/24 Surveyor #2 observed Resident #9 seated in a wheelchair dressed in a sweatshirt and pants. The resident was self-propelling the wheelchair out of the elevator onto the first floor. The resident stated recalling a recent incident that involved him/her and another resident. Surveyor #2 reviewed Resident #9's admission Record which revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: cerebral aneurysm (a bulge or ballooning in a blood vessel in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other faciloirty documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage, Last Date Revised 7/19/2023, revealed the following under the heading POLICY: Sufficient storage facilities will be provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food will be stored in an area that is clean, dry, and free from contaminants. Food will be stored at appropriate temperatures and by methods designed to prevent contamination or cross contamination. The following was revealed under the PROCEDURE section: 10. Food will be stored a minimum of 6 inches above the floor, 18 inches from the ceiling and 2 inches from the wall on clean racks or other clean surfaces, and is protected from splashes, overhead pipes, or other contamination (ceiling sprinklers, sewer/waste disposal pipes, vents, etc.). 12. Leftover food will be stored in covered containers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required beneficiary notices for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Resident # 140 and Resident # 162. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of a facility policy on 07/29/2024 at 8:32 AM, titled Notice-Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) with a creation date of 7/2019, revealed under the Policy section; The Advanced Beneficiary Notice of non-coverage (ABN) is issued by the facility to original Medicare (fee for service-FFS) beneficiaries in situations where Medicare payment is expected to be denied. Medicare requires SNF's (Skilled Nursing Facilities) to issue SNFABN to Original Medicare, also called FFS beneficiaries prior to providing care that Medicare usually covers but may not pay for in this instance because the care is: not medically reasonable and necessary or considered custodial. On 07/23/2024 at 01:45 PM, the surveyor requested 3 random residents, 1 resident who went home and 2 residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ00173786 Based on interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify in writing, the representative of the New Jersey Long-Term Care Ombudsman's office (LTCO) of resident emergency transfers to the hospital/discharges, when practicable, as mandated by Federal law. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 37 sampled residents (Resident #54 and Resident # ADD NUMBER) and was evidenced by the following: On 07/25/2024 at 04:00 PM, a review of a facility policy titled NJ Ombudsman Mandatory Reporting with last revised date of 2/2023 under procedure section Transfer/Discharge, Copies of all facility-initiated (non-resident-driven) discharge notices shall be provided to the LTCO. 1. On 07/22/2024 at 01:29 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident # 54 which revealed the following: Resident # 54 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Urinary Tract Infection, Urinary Calculus (kidney stones), and Hydronephrosis (excess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement and revise a care planned intervention (use of heel booties (prevent pressure ulcers from forming) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for position/mobility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive, Last Date Revised: 10/2019. The following was revealed at POLICY: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The following was revealed under PROCEDURE: 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. c. Describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above but are not provided due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow hold parameters for administration of insulin (a diabetic medication) in accordance with the resident's physician's orders and in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 36 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #39). A review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated revised 12/2023, included medications must be administered in accordance with orders, including any required time frame . Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders specifically to change the piston syringe (a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger) every 24 hours for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Tube Feeding, (Resident #37.). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of facility policy on 07/24/2024 at 12:08 PM, titled Enteral Feedings with last revised date of 4/2023, did not include documentation of the care and changing of the piston syringe kit. On 07/31/2024 at 10:26 AM, the DON provided the surveyor the same policy titled Enteral Feedings. The following was highlighted under the Procedure section: 4. Ensure that equipment and devices are working properly by performing any calibrations or checks as instructed by manufacturer. 12. Administration and feeding sets. a. Feeding may be reused for next scheduled feed as long as it is free from contamination, however; b. Replace tubing and feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other pertinent facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control measures for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #22 and Resident #63). This deficient practice was identified by the following: The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Nebulizer Medication/COVID 19, Last Revised Date: 1/2023. The following was revealed under the heading POLICY: Nebulization is used to deliver medications along the respiratory tract and is indicated for various respiratory problems and diseases. The therapy must be prescribed by a properly licensed physician or physician extender. The purpose of the procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. Nebulizer treatments will be given by licensed nursing staff or respiratory therapists as directed, using proper technique…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 forms) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 3 of 3 forms provided. The evidence was as follows: A review of the facility's provided Medication- Narcotic Management policy with a revised date of 4/2023 did not include information related to the completion of the DEA 222 forms. On 7/30/2024 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed on three of the three provided forms Part 5, had not been completed upon receipt of the medications from the provider pharmacy as instructed on the reverse of the ordering form. The forms were as follows: Order form number: 221690894; 221690895; and 221690896. On 7/30/2024 at 1:39 PM, the surveyor and Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the provided DEA 222 forms. The DON acknowledged she should have completed the Part 5 as instructed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ COMPLAINT #: 169607 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process for a resident who elected hospice services. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #565), and was evidenced by the following: A review of facility's Electronic Submission of MDS policy dated revised August 2023, included that all MDS assessments (e.g., admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into our facility's MDS information system and transmitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current OBRA regulations governing the transmission of MDS data .a Significant Change in Status (SCSA) Comprehensive has a MDS Completion Date is the 14th calendar day after determination of significant change in status . A review of the facility's Centers Health Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ00172065 and NJ00169138 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans in a timely manner following an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 36 residents (Resident #515 and #265) reviewed for care plans. A review of the facility's Care Plan policy, last revised 10/2019, included .13. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. A review of the facility's undated Job Description Licensed Practical Nurse document included .Participate in the development of a plan of care for each resident. A review of the facility's undated Job Description Registered Nurse document included .Reviews and regularly evaluates resident care plans to meet nursing goals. A review of the facility's undated Job Description Unit Manager document included .Responsible for the evaluation and monitoring of all levels of resident care through on-site observations and audits, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ Complaint #:163266 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who smoked cigarettes was assessed for safety; educated on facility rules and safety for smoking; and care planned for smoking to ensure resident safety. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #266), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility's Smoking Program dated revised October 2022, included a Smoking Assessment will be completed by the nurse for all new admissions who are identified as patients who smoke. If a resident previously identified as a nonsmoker expresses the desire to begin smoking, the Smoking Assessment will be completed at that time .An individualized plan of care will be developed for the resident to ensure his/her smoking safety based on the outcome of the Smoking Assessment . On 7/25/24 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor requested from the Assistant Administrator (AA) to provide a copy of Resident #266's Facility Report Event (FRE) that was reported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint: NJ00160690, NJ00163037, NJ00166486 Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure clean plates and pans were air dried prior to storage and not stacked wet. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 155 of 157 residents in the facility who received dietary services at the time of the survey. Two residents received tube feedings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy ''Dish Washing and Storage Policy,'' dated 06/17/19, revealed, ''Policy: Dishes, pots and pans will be washed and dried using the procedures, chemicals and equipment that result in clean, sanitized dishes, pans flatware and utensils. Procedure: Dish Machine Washing: .Dishes, pots, pans, utensils, and flatware must be air dried before being stored. Do not dry with towels . 7. Employees are trained in proper dishwashing and drying procedures . Observation and interview on 02/20/24 at 11:40 AM, the plates stacked in two different plate warmers, next to the steam table to be used for lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ000165571, NJ00160246, NJ00163849 Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the timely administration of a medication for one (Resident (R) R11) out of 15 residents reviewed in the sample. Specifically, R11's sliding scale insulin was administered late four times between 02/01/24 and 02/20/24. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 12/2019 indicated, .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required timeframe . Review of R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Type 2 diabetes. Review of R11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), found in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/24/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ00165000, NJ00163037 Based on policy review, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control practices were maintained for one Resident (R ) R11 out of four residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN 4) was observed administering a blood sugar check and sliding scale insulin and failed to ensure the glucometer was appropriately sanitized before and after use, failed to ensure a clean barrier was utilized when placing the glucometer down on a surface in the resident's room while administering the blood sugar check, and failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene by wearing false 1.5-inch-long nails during the administration of R11's medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning/Disinfecting Resident Care Items and Equipment dated 05/18/23 indicated, .2. Shared resident care items/equipment shall be cleaned/disinfected between each resident and use according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — widespread
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00157442, NJ00153388 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 9 residents (Resident #45, #160, #155 and #72) observed for incontinence care on 2 of 3 units (First Floor 1 C and Second Floor 2 B) observed for incontinence care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F725 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 05/17/23 at 9:42 AM, the surveyors noted a strong smell of urine that permeated the air on the first floor of the facility in the hallway beyond the main entrance to the facility that led to the first floor nursing units. On 05/24/23 at 9:02 AM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 who stated that she was assigned to 13 residents. CNA #3 stated that she had to pass breakfast trays before she performed AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner in order to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/17/2023 at 9:33 AM, the surveyor accompanied by the Food service Director (FSD) observed the following in the kitchen: The surveyor observed a number of unlabeled items throughout the kitchen which included three bags of sugar on the table, on a shelf there were rolls and bagels, in the meat freezer there was a bag of chicken wings and one veggie burger in a box. In the ice cream freezer there were three boxes of Dixie ice cream cups. In the dry storage there was one can of Mashed potatoes and one box of Raisin Bran cereal. Over the sink on a shelf were five bags of cake mix. In the walk in refrigerator there was one block of margarine. On the counter there was a container of [NAME] thickener that was unlabled. The FSD observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ #00151692, NJ #00153388, NJ#00157947, NJ#00158216, NJ00157442, NJ00158731, NJ00158017 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) provide nursing and related services to assure the residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care in accordance with the facility assessment and b.) provide sufficient staffing numbers to meet minimum staffing requirements. This deficient practice was observed on 2 of 3 nursing units and for 4 of 9 residents' reviewed, (Resident #45, #72, #155 and #160) ) for care related to staffing. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F677 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 05/17/23 at 9:42 AM, the surveyors noted a strong smell of urine that permeated the air on the first floor of the facility in the hallway beyond the main…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy and promote dignity during resident assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #120) reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/22/23 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor entered the second floor nurse's station and observed the Nurse Practitioner as he listened to Resident #120's lung sounds with a stethoscope as the resident stood outside of the day room in the presence of other residents and staff. When interviewed at that time, the Nurse Practitioner stated that he usually assessed the resident in his/her room but the resident had a tendency to walk out of the room as he/she was a wanderer. According to the admission Record Resident #120 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, condition of constriction of the airways and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable space to allow the resident to move about the room without impairment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #91) reviewed for position and mobility. This deficient practice was identified by the following: On 05/24/23 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #91 who self-propelled in the wheelchair with notable right sided weakness. The resident reportedly was unable to access his/her night stand or get out of bed on the left side as Resident #160's bed was placed horizontally against the wall and was pushed snugly up against Resident #91's night stand. CNA #3 was present and stated that she realized that Resident #160's bed was too far over and blocked the Resident #91 access to his/her night stand but she had not reported it to maintenance. CNA #3 stated that Resident #160's bed and night stand should have pushed over so that Resident #91 had more room to get in and out of bed. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 8 nursing units (Unit 2 B) in 2 of 3 residents (Resident #45 and #160) observed for incontinence care This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/22/23 at 11:36 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #160's room and noted that there were two large holes in the wall behind the entry door of the room with exposed mesh. The area surrounding both holes had a thick, white coating around them which differed from the color the room was painted. The surveyor asked the resident how long the holes were there? The resident responded, The holes have been there forever. On 05/24/23 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 who stated that the two holes behind Resident #160's door had been there for months. CNA #3 stated that she had not reported the holes herself, but maintenance already knew about it. CNA #3 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #169, Resident #87, and Resident #45) reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/17/2023 at 11:01 AM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #169 was observed ambulating in the hallway towards the room. The resident told the surveyor they were just on a smoke break. Review of the admission Record indicated that Resident #169 was admitted to the facility on 03/2023. Medical diagnoses included, but not limited to surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, abscess (collection of pus) of the abdominal wall, anxiety disorder and bipolar disease (psychiatric illness that has both depressive and manic episodes). Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE] showed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician's order for an orthosis (a device to correct alignment). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for positioning and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The nurse practice act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ#00158216, NJ#00157947, NJ#00158017, and NJ#00158731 Based on interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed 1.) to clarify a physician's order for wound care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing for Resident #284 and 2.) to follow an active physician's order for the daily wound care treatment for Resident #103. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #284 and Resident #103), and was evidenced by the following: 1. Resident #284 was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included, but was not limited to fracture of the second cervical vertebra and chronic kidney disease. A review of the order Summary Report with active orders as of 9/5/22 reflects a physician order (PO) dated 9/5/22 for Santyl Ointment (a cream used for wound care) 250unit/MG (collagenase) apply to per additional directions topically everyday shift for wound care. There is no location specified. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with decreased range of motion (ROM) and mobility received prescribed treatments to prevent contractures (Deformity of joints) and maintain current level of function for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for decreased ROM (Resident #91). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 05/17/23 at 11:20 AM, Resident #91 was observed self-propelling in the wheelchair with notable right sided weakness. The resident motioned the surveyor into his/her room and showed the surveyor a right hand splint that was on the window sill and was reportedly not offered to the resident for assistance with application. According to the admission Record, Resident #91 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included, but were not limited to: sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that that the facility failed to: a) properly assess and implement the facility's fall management policy for a resident after a reported, unwitnessed fall b) ensure fall prevention interventions were followed by ensuring that a resident's bed was in the locked position This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #99, Resident #284) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 05/17/23 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #99 who was seated at the foot of an unsampled resident's bed visiting with friends. The Resident reported a fall from bed a couple of nights ago and lifted their shirt and revealed a large circular purple bruise on the right side of the upper abdomen. The resident stated he/she also had a bruise and a cut on the right knee which was covered beneath the resident's clothing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with nutritional interventions that were recommended for a resident with significant weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/24/23 at 9:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #102 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated eating breakfast. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 who assisted the resident stated that the resident always ate all of his/her food and asked for seconds. Review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #102 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2022 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: vascular dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke), aphasia (language disorder that affects a persons ability to communicate), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), alcoholic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen (O2) therapy consistent with physician's order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #70 and was evidenced by the following: On 05/24/2023 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #70 sitting on the bed receiving oxygen per nasal cannula (NC) (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen therapy via nasil passages) by way of a concentrator (concentrates the oxygen from a gas supply by removing nitrogen to supply oxygen). The O2 concentrator was set to deliver O2 at a flow rate of 3 liters via NC and there was separate tubing on the dresser across the room that was partially inside the top drawer. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assisting Resident #70 with getting dressed and removed the tubing and laid it down on the residents' bed. The O2 tubing was observed on the bed and was dated for 5/24/2023 with a piece of plastic tape. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to A. establish a system of records for all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for the dispensing of controlled medications and B. ensure a controlled drug was dispensed in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 4 medication carts inspected and during the medication pass and was evidenced by the following: A.On 5/24/23 at 10:43 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), the surveyor inspected the medication cart on First Floor C Unit for storage and labeling of medications. During reconciliation of controlled medications, the surveyor observed the following: 1. 1 bottle of Methadone (a narcotic medication used to treat pain) in the narcotic box but the Controlled Drug Sheet (CDS) documented 2 bottles were left. 2. 41 Clonazepam (a narcotic medication used for anxiety) 0.5mg pills in the blister pack but the CDS documented there were 42 left. The LPN stated that she should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and NursingMinoa, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareGloversville, NY 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5Martine Center For Rehabilitation And NursingWhite Plains, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Troy Center For Rehabilitation And NursingTroy, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HAGLER, DARYLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/28/2012
GOLDMAN, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
HENDRIX, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
LANTZITSKY, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
ROZENBERG, KENNETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
COHEN, YEHUDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2025
CONTI, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/14/2017
ABRAMCHIK, AMIRIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$188K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 5%Other / private 3%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $188K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,240per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next