No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare

847 County Highway 122, Gloversville, NY 12078 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (518) 773-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (518) 773-3400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
99 E State St · (518) 271-2020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
42 N Main St · (518) 725-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
261 W Fulton St · (518) 725-7422 · Call to confirm hours
Park
139 Spring St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
521 N Main St · (518) 705-4186

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.8%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms64.6%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%13.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.9%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.171.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.611.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 35.1–54.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.5–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.3–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
54.0%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 173.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-01)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a survey, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain sanitary bedside care equipment, ensure clean and orderly bedside food storage, safeguard and properly distribute resident-owned personal property, systematically track and investigate missing personal items, and maintain the structural integrity of physical plant walls. Findings were identified across four sampled residents (Resident #17, Resident #25, Resident #26, and Resident #29) and throughout facility-wide areas as detailed below: Findings include: Review of Facility Policies Home Like Environment (Dated 9/19/2022): Documented that residents must be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Staff shall provide person-centered care maximizing characteristics reflecting a personalized setting, explicitly including (a.) cleanliness and order and (e.) pleasant, neutral scents. Personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse and or neglect for three (Resident #114, 156, and #181) of seven residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #'s 114 and 181 were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation where Resident #181 pushed Resident #114's wheelchair from behind causing the resident to fall from their wheelchair; (b.) Resident #156 was admitted to the hospital with a Discharge summary dated 11/2025 documenting a compression fracture of the lumbar spine level 1. The hospital recommendation were to follow up with Orthopedics because they had recommended a kyphoplasty for the Lumbar 1 compression fracture and Resident #156 should be referred to neurosurgery for the procedure. There was no documentation of orthopedic, or neurosurgery follow up. Furthermore, the Director of Nursing and Administrator were not aware that Resident #156 had a compression fracture. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile controlled medications in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the narcotic count record signature sheet for five of eight units were signed in advanced or incomplete. Findings include: A review of narcotic count record book for Unit A cart 300 documented: On 05/28/2026 at 11:02 AM the 7 AM-3 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #1 signed in advance as the off going nurse at 3 PM A review of narcotic count record book for Unit C cart 500 documented: On 5/28/2026 at 10:30 AM the 7 AM-3 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #2 had not signed as oncoming nurse at 7 AM A review of 05/2026 narcotic count record book for Unit D cart 800 documented: On coming nurse did not sign for 05/01/2026 at 3:00 PM On coming nurse did not sign for 05/09/2026 at 7:00 AM Outgoing nurse did not sign for 05/09/2026 at 3:00 PM On coming nurse did not sign for 05/26/2026 at 3:00 PM On 05/27/2026 at 2:36 PM the 3PM-11 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for three (3) (Resident #'s 26, 79, and 116) of five (5) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #'s 26 and 79, food was not served at an appetizing temperature during a lunch meal on 5/28/2026 and the fries were too crispy to eat; and (b.) Resident #116 was served burnt stuffed shells during a dinner meal that were not palatable. Additionally, 10 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting stated the food was not good, often cold, and was overcooked or undercooked. The findings include: The facility policy titled Food Temperatures revised 5/28/2025, documented food temperatures of cold and hot food items would be recorded on all menu items and substitutions for meal service to maintain a high level of quality assurance and to monitor potentially hazardous food temperatures as per state and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents could safely self-administer medication when clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #108) of one (1) resident reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #108 had an inhaler observed in their room that was not listed in the resident's orders, they reported using the medication, and they were not assessed for their ability to self-administer medication. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Self-Administration reviewed 7/2019, documented the resident may request to keep medications at bedside for self-administration in accordance with resident rights. The staff and practitioner would assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications was clinically appropriate for the resident upon request. In addition to a general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the nurse would perform a more specific skill assessment. It would be determined if the resident was able to safely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to exercise the right to self-determination, including making choices regarding daily routines and preferences, for two (Resident #4 and #79) of two residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, (a.) Resident #4 was not permitted to go outside as they preferred; (b.) Resident #79 had not been able to have a shower since they were admitted to the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised 05/28/2024, indicated residents have the right to self-determination and are to be supported by the facility in exercising their rights. Residents have the right to communicate with and access to people and services both inside and outside the facility. The facility's policy, Out on Pass/Therapeutic Leave, revised 05/27/2026, indicated residents may leave the facility with or without an escort following an assessment of the resident's ability to do so. The policy further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown source immediately, but not later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion, if the events that cause the suspicion result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the suspicion do not result in serious bodily injury, to the State Agency for three (Resident #'s 114, 181, and 191) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the following incidents were not reported to the New York State Department of Health: (a.) Resident #191 had a fall with a significant injury of unknown origin; (b.) Resident #'s 114 and 181 were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation on 9/08/2025 where Resident #181 pushed Resident #114's wheelchair from behind causing the resident to fall. Staff witnessed this and police were called. Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were discharged according to professional standards for one (Resident #182) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the facility refused to accept Resident #182 back to the facility following a brief hospital evaluation. Findings include: The facility policy, Discharge- Transfer Discharge Process,reviewed 02/2025, indicated the facility would coordinate a safe transfer or discharge for residents leaving the facility; residents were permitted to remain in the facility unless an allowable discharge criterion was met; residents and/or their representatives would receive written notice of a transfer or discharge, including appeal rights; residents who appealed a transfer or discharge would not have been discharged while the appeal was pending unless specified exceptions applied; a hospital was not an appropriate discharge destination; and residents had the right to return to the facility upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that Preadmission Screening and Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review's (PASARRs) were completed according to professional standards of practice prior to admission and as needed for two (Resident #'s 19 and 180) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #19's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review instrument indicated the resident had serious mental illness, was admitted to the facility for convalescent care, and a new screen was not completed at the end the residents convalescent care stay when the resident remained in the facility, and (b.) Resident #180 was admitted to the facility prior to receiving Level II PASARR recommendations. The facility policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Instrument (PASARR) reviewed 10/22/2026, documented every admission to the facility would have a Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) completed prior to admission to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for four (Residents #26, 79, 161, and 175) of 43 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, for (a) Resident #26, the comprehensive care plan did not include care areas that addressed the need for multiple medications including Ropinirole HCl two milligrams for restless leg syndrome, Tizanidine HCl four milligrams for muscle spasms, Kenalog-49 injection suspension 40 milligrams per milliliter for pain, and Lidocaine HCl injection solution one percent 10 milliliters to mix with Kenalog; for (b) Resident #79, the comprehensive care plan did not include a care area that addressed Resident #79's self-management of their ostomy pouch; for (c) Resident #161, the comprehensive care plan did not include a care area that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident and their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for two (2) (Resident #'s 105 and 110) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #105 was bed bound and was not offered to attend activities or provided with activities; and (b.) Resident #110 was observed in bed on multiple occasions without stimulation or activities present and there was no documentation to support that they were offered, provided with, or attended activities The facility policy titled Activity Program last reviewed 5/2019, documented the facility must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were provided with Quality of Care according to professional standards of practice for two (Residents #65, and #29) of forty-three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #65 was prescribed injectable medication for Diabetes Mellitus (body cannot process sugars, leading to high blood sugars) without the diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus causing the resident to have a significant drop in blood sugar. Resident #29 had bilateral upper extremity dressings that were observed not to be intact for several hours a day after nursing was made aware. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review dated 09/10/2025 documented the Consultant Pharmacist shall review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly and will report irregularities as required by state and/or federal regulations, whichever is most stringent. The primary purpose of the medication regimen review is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing of pressure ulcers for two (2) (Resident #10 and #105) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #105's left heel pressure ulcer showed significant decline. There was no daily documentation of the wound assessment and staff did not notify the provider of the decline. Resident #10 was noted with a Stage Four pressure ulcer with a care planned intervention and physicians order for wound vacuum. The wound vacuum dressing ordered was not in place. No dressing was observed on the wound bed, and no removed dressing was observed in the resident's bed linens or surrounding area. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Skin and Pressure Injury Prevention revised 6/2/2024, documented This facility will assess residents for risk in the development of pressure injuries and implement preventative measures in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for four (Cart A 300-hall, Cart B 400-hall, Cart D 700 hall and Cart D 800 hall) out of four medication carts reviewed. Specifically, one stock medication had expired; one bottle of Flonase was uncapped; one loose pill was found in cart; one inhaler had an open date but was never opened; one stock medication had conflicting expiration dates; one Lantus kwik pen had no open date; one Lantus vial had no open date; five inhalers had no open and or expiration dates; one inhaler had no label at all; three narcotic count shifts were signed out prior to actual count reconciliation and change of shift; another narcotic book had multiple missing signatures for shift change. The facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Medication - Storage and Labeling reviewed 1/2026 documented This facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served following professional standards for food service safety in the central kitchen. Specifically, skim milk cartons were found past expiration dates. Findings include: During inspection in the central kitchen on 5/21/2026, the following items were found to be out of compliance with New York State food safety regulations: At 11:00AM approximately 15 cartons of skim milk were identified in the walk-in cooler placed in a small plastic cooler which were past the expiration date ( 5/17/2026) At 12:15 PM this cooler was identified to be at the tray line, and the expired milk was being placed on the lunch trays for the residents During interview, on 5/21/2026 at 12:15PM, Director of Food Services #1 stated the milk which was in the coolers [NAME] on the tray line to be used and it [NAME] precooled and separated to maintain temperature during tray preparation. When it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the survey, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #10) of 43 residents reviewed for infection control practices. Specifically, 1.) Certified Nurse Aide # 5 failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions during resident care, increasing the risk of cross- contamination for a resident with a stage four pressure ulcer. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for potential infection and compromised care delivery. Findings include: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 8/2022 (last updated 2/25/2026), documented the Enhanced Barrier Precautions is applicable for residents with Wounds (e.g., any type of wound requiring a dressing). EBP requires wearing disposable gloves and an isolation gown prior to high contact activity. High Contact care activities include transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (Case #455653), the facility did not ensure a final accounting of resident funds to the probate jurisdiction (a court that hears matters surrounding a person's death) administering the resident's Estate, within 30 days of the resident's death in accordance with State law for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 resident reviewed for transfer of personal funds upon death to the probate jurisdiction administering the resident's Estate. Specifically, Resident #1's date of death was [DATE]. A check dated [DATE] issued by the facility from the Resident Fund Trust Account was paid to the order of New York State Department of Health.This was evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Resident Funds Accounts (RFA) created 8/2014 and last updated 8/2020 documented upon the death of a resident: a. Unutilized resident funds and a final accounting of those funds shall be conveyed to the appointed executor or administrator of the resident's estate within thirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during abbreviated survey (case #NY00329501), the facility did not provide effective maintenance services one (1) of 4 resident units and 3 dining areas. Specifically, furniture in the facility was not in good repair. This is evidenced by: During observations on 01/10/2024 from 10:26 AM through 1:31 PM, resident chairs had worn upholstery in the following areas: Golden Hours Room dining and recreation room: 3 chairs. Mountain View Dining Room: 2 chairs. Evergreen Dining Room: 6 chairs. D Unit nurse station: 2 chairs. During an interview on 05/08/2024 at 2:52 PM, Administrator #1 stated that Director of Maintenance #1 would be directed to remove that worn chairs, and new chairs would be ordered. 10 New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations 415.5(h)(4)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care for 4 (Resident #'s 4, 41, 46, and 73) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for Resident #4, the facility did not ensure supplemental oxygen was provided as ordered by the physician on 11/10/2023, 11/13/2023, 11/14/2023, and 11/15/2023 and did not ensure supplemental oxygen tubing was dated and labeled to reflect the tubing was changed as ordered; for Resident #41, the facility did not ensure supplemental oxygen was provided as ordered by the physician on 11/10/2023, 11/13/2023, and 11/14/2023 and the resident's nasal cannula (NC) and humidifier bottle were changed as ordered by the physician on 11/08/2023; for Resident #46, did not ensure oxygen tubing was labeled with a time and date in accordance with physician orders on 11/09/2023, 11/10/2023, and 11/16/2023;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews during the recertification survey dated 11/9/2023-11/16/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident received, and the facility provided, food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 of 5 units. Specifically, on 11/15/2023, the facility did not ensure food served was pleasant tasting and that cold food was served at temperatures less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and warm food was served at temperatures greater than 135 F. This was evidenced by: Food Council Meeting Minutes dated August 2023 through October 2023 documented the following: - 9/26/2023 - Residents complained that the food was served cold, and trays delivered late. - 10/24/2023 - Residents complained that trays were delivered. and sat in the hallways for 20 minutes because staff were not present to pass the trays and that coffee and eggs were served cold. Unit A During an observation on 11/15/2023 at 1:33 PM, the last lunch tray was served, and a test tray provided. The test tray temperatures were taken, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey from 11/9/2023 through 11/16/2023, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, for Resident #4, the facility did not ensure nursing consistently completed and reviewed the resident's dialysis communication log between 10/12/2023 through 11/9/2023. This was evidenced by: Resident #4: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic respiratory failure, and essential hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 9/22/2023 documented the resident could be understood and could understand others. The policy and procedure titled Dialysis, dated 5/2019, documented that a Communications Log would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00283608) the facility did not ensure that medications for a resident, ordered by the physician were administered by a Licensed Professional Nurse in accordance with regulation for one (Resident #523) of 17 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure medications were provided by a Licensed Professional Nurse, when on 9/19/2021, on the evening shift, a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) gave medications to Resident #523 after a Registered Nurse (RN) prepared them. This was evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure for Medication Administration dated 12/2019, documented that only persons licensed or permitted by this State (New York) to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. Resident #523: Resident #523 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). The Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00291136), the facility did not ensure the resident representative(s) was informed when accidents occurred for 1 (Resident #1) out of 9 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not inform Resident #1's representative after the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 12/25/21 and was sent out to the hospital. This was evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Change in Condition Notification, dated August 2019, read in pertinent part, It was the policy of this facility to monitor residents' for changes in their condition, to respond appropriately to those changes and to notify the physician and responsible party/family member of changes. Unless otherwise instructed by Resident's choice, the licensed nurse will notify the resident's next of kin / responsible person when the Resident is involved in any accident / incident, that results in injury including injuries of unknown origin. If the physician cannot be reached, the resident will be transported immediately to a higher level of care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Automatic dishwashing machines are to operate in accordance with manufacturer specifications, food temperature thermometers are to be calibrated, and food and non-food contact surfaces, floors, and walls are to be kept clean and in good repair. Specifically, automatic dish washing machines were not rinsing at the specified water pressure, food temperature thermometers were not in calibration, and in the main kitchen and unit kitchenettes the floors, walls, and equipment were not clean and/or in good repair. Additionally, the Emergency Food Supply Storage Room floor and walls were not clean, does not have a door, was very dusty and had a heavy musty odor. This is evidenced as follows. Finding #1 The main kitchen was inspected on 07/15/2021 at 9:59 AM. The 3 bulk food containers were not labeled, and the bulk sugar bin had a cracked lid and is not cleanable. One of 3 food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide a Facility Assessment that documented a facility wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies during the recertification survey. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the facility assessment included an evaluation of the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff were available to meet each resident's needs. This is evidenced by: On 07/21/2021, the Facility assessment dated [DATE], documented under the heading Staffing Plan that staffing was modeled to meet the needs of all resident based on their clinical acuity. The Facility Assessment did not include an evaluation of the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff were available to meet each resident's needs. During an interview on 7/21/2021 at 11:11 AM, Human Resource…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-21 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side. Specifically, handrails were not firmly secured and affixed to corridor walls. This is evidenced as follows. During facility observations on 07/20/2021 at 1:50 PM, the handrail on the corridor wall between resident room #'s 169 and #171 was loose when checked. The Director of Maintenance stated in an interview on 07/20/2021 at 4:18 PM, that the loose handrail will be repaired and checked and the other handrails will also be checked. 483.90(i)(3)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure it immediately consulted the resident's physician when there was a significant change in condition for 1 (Resident #52) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, for Resident #52, the facility did not ensure that the Medical Doctor (MD) was notified on 7/17/2021 that the resident, who was receiving a blood thinner medication, had been vomiting since the evening of 7/16/2021, and given a medication to prevent vomiting twice with no effect, vomited a large amount of black liquid and continued to vomit until the resident was found in his room, grey in color and gasping for breath. Subsequently, the resident was admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleed and shock. This is evidenced by: Resident #52: The resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of ileus (temporary and often painful lack of movement in the intestines, occurs when the intestines do not move food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Specifically, for Resident #83, the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation was completed when the resident reported their watch was missing. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Grievances, last revised 9/2020, documented the facility will investigate and resolve resident grievances timely to ensure residents' rights are protected. The Director of Social Work (DSW) is the facility's Grievance Officer (GO) and is responsible for facilitating the complaint/grievance process. All complaint/grievances should be given to the GO/DSW when they are received. The GO will then give the complaint/grievance form to the department involved in the complaint/grievance. Upon receipt of a complaint/grievance the department will investigate the allegation and submit a written report of the findings within 7 business days. The Administrator will review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the environment was not free from accident hazards over which the facility has control. The resident environment is to remain as free from accident hazards as is possible. Specifically, sharp objects were protruding from door frames in resident areas. This is evidenced as follows. A general inspection of the nursing units on 07/20/2021 01:50 PM revealed two protruding and partially attached screws in each of the door frames in resident room #'s 812, 813, and #903 and the Evergreen Dining Room resident area storeroom door. The Director of Maintenance stated in an interview on 07/20/2021 at 04:40 PM that the facility will be checked for protruding screws. 10 NYCRR 415.12(h)(1)

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during a recertification and abbreviated (Case # NY00278860) survey, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services for 1 (Unit D) of 4 units surveyed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure there was sufficient staffing to ensure residents were fed and cared for in a timely manner on the D unit, Wing 800 on 7/15/2021 and 7/20/2021. This was evidenced by: The Policy & Procedure titled Dining and dated 1/2020 documented, residents who are unable to come to the dining room or who desire to dine in their own room shall be provided with room service. Nursing Services was responsible for the delivery of individual trays including obtaining tray from cart and assisting the resident with tray set-up as necessary. Trays shall be delivered within 15 minutes of cart delivery. The Facility Census and Condition (C&C) dated 7/15/2021, documented the current facility census was 171. A C&C provided by the facility for Wing 800…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-21 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure foods brought to residents is in accordance with adopted regulations. Specifically, the facility does not provide information for family and other visitors on safe food handling practices or safe reheating of food that they bring to residents. This is evidenced is as follows. The facility policy for foods brought in by visitors was reviewed on 07/16/2021. This policy states that the Dietitian/Nursing will provide family and visitors with education of safe food handling practices. Observations inside the A Unit kitchenette refrigerator on 07/16/2021 at 9:42 AM, revealed food in residential/domestic style containers labeled with the name of Resident #62. The Registered Nurse (RN #1) on the A Unit stated in an interview on 07/16/2021 at 9:42 AM, that Resident #62, on the evening of 07/14/2021, had food (porridge, macaroni & cheese) provided most likely by the sibling or former spouse of Resident #62. RN #1 was not aware if the nursing staff provided safe food preparation/handling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services and that bed and bath linens provided to the residents' were clean and in good condition. Specifically; the facility did not ensure that on 4 of 4 resident units and the service areas, furniture, walls, and floors were clean and/or in good repair. This was evidenced by: This is evidenced as follows. Finding #1 The facility did not ensure that on 4 of 4 resident units and the service areas, furniture, walls, and floors were clean and/or in good repair. Resident Units A, B, C and D and the service areas were spot checked on 07/20/2021 at 11:30 AM and again at 01:50 PM. The vanities in resident room #'s 163, 606, 608, 813, and #909 had chipped paint or missing drawer fronts. The walls in resident room #'s 163 and #909 and the Activities Room had chipped paint, chipped gypsum board or peeling plaster. The floors were soiled with a brown buildup next to walls and in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-07-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, dumpsters were not maintained in a sanitary condition. This is evidenced as follows. The garbage dumpsters were inspected on 07/15/2021 at 9:59 AM. One of 3 dumpsters was placed on the earthen ground and was soiled with oily black drip marks around the side door. The instructions on the dumpster state Notice, Container Must Be Placed on a Hard Level Surface, Load Uniformly. The Director of Maintenance stated in an interview on 07/15/2021 at 1:31 PM, that the waste disposal vendor will be instructed to place all dumpsters on the blacktop, and the dumpster that needs cleaning will be switched out. 10 NYCRR 415.14(h)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareHammonton, NJ 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and NursingMinoa, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5Martine Center For Rehabilitation And NursingWhite Plains, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Troy Center For Rehabilitation And NursingTroy, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ABRAMCHIK, AMIRIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 04/01/2012
ROZENBERG, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY81%since 01/01/2025
SICKLICK, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 05/01/2015
GOLDMAN, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
HENDRIX, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
LANTZITSKY, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
DIMARIA, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2023
YEHUDA, YOSEFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 9%Other / private 23%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$392per resident / day
operating cost
$11,906per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335091. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next