Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 155 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 120.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility failed to ensure that all residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive (medical interventions in the event of a life-threatening episode) that would be honored for 5 (Residents #57, #76, #104, #364, and #508) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' advance directive (code status) identifiers were consistently documented for Resident #57, #104, #364 and #508, whose Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) identified their code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR -meaning to allow natural death and not initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in the absence of pulse and respiration) while their physician orders documented orders for Full Code (to initiate CPR). Additionally, MOLST forms for Residents #57, #364, and #508 identified them as cognitively intact, with the ability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-04-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral nutrition, (tube placed in the stomach via the abdomen to receive nutritional support) were provided treatment and services in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice to prevent complications for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed (Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #9). Specifically, Resident #5 did not receive prescribed enteral nutrition and hydration for multiple days and was hospitalized ; Resident #7 and Resident #9 had significant inconsistencies in the administration of prescribed enteral nutrition and hydration without physician orders, clinical justification, or documented refusals. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm, that was not Immediate Jeopardy, for Resident #5 who developed dehydration (a condition caused by insufficient fluid intake resulting in fluid imbalance), hypotension (low blood pressure), and new onset atrial fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents in the facility. Specifically, staffing levels were insufficient to meet resident care needs, the facility did not consistently meet its own identified minimum staffing levels, and the facility failed to implement sufficient contingency staffing measures to address known staffing shortages, resulting in missed medication administrations, delayed medication administration, and inability to complete ordered treatments.The findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility was licensed for 124 beds with a daily census of 120 to 122 residents. The Facility Assessment included staffing would be adjusted based on resident acuity and included a minimum staffing plan of two (2) nurses on the first floor during day shift from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, one (1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders, resulting in clinically significant medication errors, for 11 of 11 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13). Specifically, Resident #8 received duplicate dosing of a controlled medication (drugs regulated due to their potential for abuse, misuse, or dependence), and several residents experienced omissions of ordered medications, and/or medications administered outside the ordered timeframe and there was no documented evidence a medical provider was notified. These failures included high-risk medications such as insulin (used to treat high blood sugar levels), anticoagulants (blood thinner), anti-seizure medications, cardiac medications (used to treat heart conditions), antibiotics (used to treat infections), and narcotics (controlled medications used to treat severe pain). The findings include: The facility policy Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner which enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure administrative systems, including staffing oversight, medication administration monitoring, and quality assurance processes, were implemented and functioning to identify and correct deficient practices, resulting in a pattern of noncompliance across multiple areas of care, including sufficient nursing staffing, medication administration, and enteral nutrition management.The findings include:The facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program reviewed 04/28/2025 documented the program was designed to support continuous evaluation of facility systems, ensure care delivery systems function consistently and accurately, identify issues and concerns, and develop and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee met at least quarterly, in accordance with regulatory requirements. Specifically, the facility had a lapse of approximately five (5) months between scheduled meetings.The findings include:Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program reviewed 04/28/2025 included the purpose, which was to support the continuous evaluation of facility systems with the objectives of ensuring care delivery systems function consistently, accurately, and incorporate current and evidence-based practice standards, where available; preventing deviation from care processes, to the extent possible; identifying issues and concerns with facility systems, as well as identifying opportunities for improvement; and developing and implementing plans to correct and/or improve identified areas.Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee policy last reviewed December 2022 indicated the committee will meet monthly at an appointed time, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025, for six (Residents #34, #36, #44, #70, #71, and #92) of six residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that concerns voiced by residents during Resident Council meetings related to resident care and life in the facility were responded to and a rationale given for the response. Specifically, during a special Resident Council meeting, multiple residents voiced multiple care concerns that they felt had not been followed up on. Review of the previous six months of meeting minutes did not include any follow ups, resolution, or a rationale for lack of resolution to the resident's concerns. This is evidenced by the following: During a special Resident Council meeting on 01/07/2025 at 2:00 PM, with six residents present, it was reported that appropriate silverware was not provided to residents for meals instead utensils that were plastic, miniature in size, and often broke in half while using. Residents reported lack of linens, not being allowed to go outside without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025, for three (first, second, and third floors) of three resident-use floors and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping or maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, exhaust ventilation was not functional, ready stand lifts were dirty, there was wall and window damage, chairs were in disrepair, a microwave oven was dirty, an exit stairwell was dirty, and an exit door was not tight fitting into the door frame. The findings are: Observations on 01/07/2025 from 9:05 AM to 9:33 AM included the exhaust ventilation on the third floor was not functioning in the staff bathroom, bathrooms of resident rooms #319 and #322, and the soiled utility room. Significant foul odors were noted in each of these rooms and when a piece of paper was placed against the exhaust grates, no air draw was observed. During an interview at this time, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025 the facility did not ensure they established and maintained an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Residents #34, #45, and #99) of 24 of residents reviewed. Specifically, appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not worn by nursing staff in residents' room that were identified by the facility as requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions while preforming high contact care to residents. Additionally, observations of multiple facility staff who had declined the influenza vaccine were not wearing face masks while in resident care areas during the current influenza season as determined by the Department of Health. The facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 05/30/2024, documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions would be initiated and implemented for residents as applicable in accordance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NY00352644 NY00348465 Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025, for three (Residents #9, #47, and #96) of 15 residents reviewed, the facility did ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, all residents were observed being served meals using disposable cutlery (plastic utensils) and dishware (paper/plastic plates) and stated it was ongoing. This was evidenced by the following: Review of the facility policy, Quality of Life/Dignity, dated 05/28/2024, documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. 1. Resident #9 had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and obesity. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 10/20/2024, documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025, for four (Resident #31, #53, #99 and #220) of seven residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive assessment of residents' needs, strengths, goals, life history, and preferences were conducted per the regulatory timeframes using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. Specifically, Residents #53 and #220 did not have their comprehensive admission assessments completed within 14 calendar days of admission, and Resident #99 did not have their comprehensive assessment completed within 14 calendar days of the assessment reference date. This is evidence by the following: The State Operations Manual and the Resident Assessment Instrument (Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment) Manual 3.0 include facilities, at a minimum, are required to complete a comprehensive assessment (Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment) of each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/06/2025 to 01/14/2025, for four (Residents #31, #47, #80, and #99) of seven residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment accurately reflected the residents' status. Specifically, the issues involved inaccurate coding for Section I - Active Diagnoses (Resident #47) and Section N - Medications (Residents #31, #80, and #99). This is evidenced by the following: Review of the current Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2024, Section I included the disease conditions in the section required a physician-documented diagnosis (or by a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist if allowable under state licensure law) in the last 60 days. Section N included medications are to be coded according to the medication's therapeutic category and/or pharmacological classification, not on how they are used. Additionally, antiplatelet medications such as aspirin, should not be coded as an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,315 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,315 — penalty dated 2023-10-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY