Granville Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.9 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated (NY00346208 and NY00351484) survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, 1) an analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from 12/01/2024 to 12/18/2024, the facility was below the minimum levels required. 2) several nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing, and 3) multiple residents reported during interviews that the facility was short-staffed at times, and this resulted in call bells not being answered timely and residents not getting out of bed in time for appointments and therapy. This is evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] there were 115 residents residing in 3 units. The Facility Assessment, which was conducted on 2/27/2024 and updated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00346208), the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident ' s choices for 10 (Resident #s 365, 368, 112, 56, 29, 73, 109, 75, 18, and 89) of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care, which included residents in every unit of the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to place and read the purified protein derivative test for tuberculosis (an infectious disease) for Resident #365 and Resident #368; the facility failed to notify a provider when Resident #365 ' s blood sugar was 61; the facility failed to monitor the vital signs of Resident #368 when the resident was newly admitted to the facility. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #112 received treatment and care to prevent hospitalization, the facility administered 4300 milligrams of Tylenol in a 13-hour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00355835), the facility did not ensure that food and drink were palatable and attractive for 4 (Resident #s 97, 75, 8, and 107) of 7 residents reviewed for palatable and attractive food and drink. Specifically, Residents #97, #75, #8 and #107 complained of food being cold, unattractive, and not palatable. Additionally, Resident # 97 and #75 lunch ticket did not match what the resident received during their lunch service on 12/17/2024. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services dated 1/2024 documented that the facility would provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Resident # 107 Resident # 107 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition that occurs when blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain the vision ability for 1 (Resident #70) of 2 residents reviewed for communication. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility did not ensure the resident, who had impaired vision, was provided with an optometry consultation to be evaluated for vision aids. This is evidenced by: Resident #70: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term breathing problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), and seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical discharges in the brain that can cause temporary changes in movement and consciousness). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/21/2024, documented the resident was understood, able to understand others, and was cognitively intact. The Minimum Data Set documented the resident had impaired vision and used corrective lenses. The Policy and Procedure titled, Physician – Consultations, dated 8/2019, stated it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review during a recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents ' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #112) of 1 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, the facility failed to administer Resident #112 ' s pain medication in a manner that managed the resident ' s pain and which resulted in the resident expressing their pain was 10 out of 10, and Family Member #2 calling 911 to have Resident #112 sent to the hospital for care. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Medication Administration – Documentation, last revised 1/2019, documented that when administering medications, documentation must include, as a minimum, a. Name and strength of the drug; b. Dosage; c. Method of administration; d. Date and time of administration; e. Reason(s) why a medication was withheld, not administered, or refused; and f. Signature and title of the person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that it provided or obtained emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 resident reviewed for Dental Services. Specifically, Resident #75 had broken a front tooth the week of 12/02/2024 and had not been seen by the dentist. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Dental Services, last revision date 9/2019, documented both routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the oral needs of each resident. Resident #75 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty breathing), and depression (a mental health condition characterized by a persistent low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 8/14/2024 documented Resident #75 was able to be understood by others and could understand others, had mild cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00355835), the facility did not ensure maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (Resident #97) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #97 did not have weekly weights measured for monitoring of significant weight loss as ordered by the dietician for the weeks of 11/25/2024 and 12/09/2024. This is evidenced by: Cross-referenced to F804: Nutritive Value/Appearance, Palatable/Prefer Temp A facility policy titled, Weight Management, with a current revision dated of 3/01/2024, documented that the resident's weight shall be obtained within twenty-four hours of admission, weekly for four weeks, then monthly thereafter and more frequently as clinically indicated for the residents, and documented in the clinical record. It further documented that the registered dietician will review the resident weights monthly, with a significant unplanned weight change and as needed. Parameters for evaluating the significance of unplanned and undesired weight is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00278217), the facility did not provide needed care and services that are resident centered and in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #5) out of 11 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the resident was assessed and that the physician was notified when Resident #5, a resident prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication, developed a nosebleed. The resident was not assessed by nursing staff when the nosebleed occurred; the resident then called for emergency services and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for treatment. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Change in Condition Notification, dated August 2019, read in pertinent part that it was the policy of the facility to monitor residents for changes in their condition, to respond appropriately to those changes and then notify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during a recertification and abbreviated surveys conducted 9/19/2022 to 9/23/2022, the facility did not ensure residents were provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on 3 of 3 units observed. Specifically, on Unit A, a strong, stale urine odor was noticed throughout the unit each day of the survey and resident rooms lacked a homelike environment in the absence of personalized items and décor. On Unit B the floors and ceiling tiles were soiled, and on Unit C the laminate trim was peeling away from the wall in a resident room. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that appropriate dishware was consistently utilized in accordance with facility policy on the B-wing nursing unit on 9/19/2022 and in the main dining area on 9/21/2022. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled, Home Like Environment created 9/19/2022 documented Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Procedure: The facility staff and management…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey dated 09/19/22 through 09/23/2022, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and two (2) of 3 nourishment areas. Specifically, in the main kitchen, one #10 can of tomato sauce found in the common stock had a V-shaped dent; the pressure gauge servicing the automatic dishwashing machine was broken; the faucet servicing the 2-compartment sink was leaking. Additionally, multiple surfaces and equipment in the main kitchen and unit areas were soiled with food particles, splatters and grime. This is evidenced as follows: The main kitchen and unit kitchenettes were inspected on 09/19/22 at 11:30 AM. In the main kitchen, one #10 can of tomato sauce found in the common stock had a V-shaped dent; the pressure gauge servicing the automatic dishwashing machine was broken; the faucet servicing the 2-compartment sink was leaking; and the microwave oven, can opener holder, door gaskets and bottom inside of the roll-in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY