No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

217 East Avenue, Minoa, NY 13116 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (315) 656-7277 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$191,992 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $191,992 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5900 N Burdick St · (315) 656-8750 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7065 Manlius Center Rd · (315) 656-9925 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
91 Hulbert St · (315) 656-3500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
225 S Main St · (315) 656-3100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.3%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms53.7%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.2%12.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.1%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.1%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.9%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.7%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.1%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.561.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.121.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.1%CMS range 28.3–47.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.0–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.6–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
69.6%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 78.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-11-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE], the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #85) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #85 had a physician order for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (chest compressions and rescue breathing when there is no pulse and/or respirations) and an advance directive for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to be attempted. On [DATE], Resident #85 was found without a pulse and was not breathing, and staff did not initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The resident was pronounced deceased by Emergency Medical Services. The facility's failure to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Resident #85 and placed all 79 residents in the facility with Advance Directives at risk for serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-20 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE] the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #41, #60 and #85) reviewed. Specifically:-Resident #85 had abnormal laboratory values on [DATE] and [DATE] that were not reviewed timely or assessed by the medical provider. -Resident #41 had a critical laboratory result on [DATE] with no documented provider notification until [DATE]. - Resident #60 had abnormal laboratory and a positive wound culture on [DATE]. The results were not reviewed until [DATE]. This resulted in the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, or death that was Immediate Jeopardy to resident's health and safety for all residents with ordered laboratory tests.Findings include: The facility policy Lab/Test Results - Reporting, revised 9/2019, documented upon completion of the test, the lab would send written results to the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00364719), the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was pushed by a staff member into a wall, causing a nosebleed and fractured nose. This resulted in harm, past noncompliance, to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy, Abuse, dated 6/1/2024, documented the facility prohibited abuse of residents and exploitation of the mentally and physically disabled resident in the facility. Abuse included willful infliction of injury, and intimidation resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching, scratching, spitting, holding roughly, kicking, etcetera. It also included controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Resident #1 had diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a progressive neurological disorder), osteopenia (bone loss), and anxiety. The 9/10/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00310562 and NY00321915), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #7, 9 and 10) reviewed. Specifically, , Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with a subdural hematoma (brain bleed) and there was no documentation a plan was implemented to monitor the resident for signs and s ymptoms of worsening subdural hematoma. Subsequently, Resident #7 exhibited a change in condition, was not assessed by a qualified professional, and was found unresponsive 12 hours later. The resident was sent to the hospital, diagnosed with an acute (sudden onset) left sided subdural hematoma that was larger in size, and the resident expired the next day. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with a surgical wound (incision site) to the spine and no treatments were ordered for 2 days. Recommended follow-up with the surgeon did not occur and the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-20 · tag F0659 — widespread
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and extended survey conducted 09/22/2025-11/20/2025, the facility did not ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility were delivered by individuals who had skills to do a particular task in accordance with each resident's written plan of care for 38 resident's with orders for cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (perform chest compressions in the absence of a heartbeat). Specifically, staff with current cardio-pulmonary resuscitation certification that met accepted national standards were not present in the building twenty-four hours per day. Findings include:The 03/13/2025 Facility Assessment Portfolio documented the services and care offered based on Resident Needs, and did not include Basic Life Saving skills or individuals requiring Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation certification.The facility job description for Licensed Practical Nurse, Registered Nurse Supervisor, Registered Nurse, and Unit Manager documented they must maintain and provide the facility with current license/certification as required by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 09/22/2025-11/20/2025 the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for one (1) of one (1) main kitchen and one (1) of one (1) dining room. Specifically, in the main kitchen prepared foods were not cooled properly, multiple boxes of food items were stored on the floor, food items were not dated, and areas of the kitchen were unclean; and the dining room had unclean and sticky floors, and multiple trays from the previous meal were stacked on a rolling rack.Findings included: The facility policy Rapid Cooling of Food, revised 01/2023, documented time/ temperature control for safety, food should be cooled rapidly. Time/ Temperature control for safety, food would be maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or cooled to 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Food would be cooled from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 70 degrees Fahrenheit within two hours. The procedure documented multiple steps to ensure proper cooling.The facility policy Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and extended survey conducted 09/22/2025 - 11/20/2025, the facility failed to ensure its operations were administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, administration's actions, inactions, or decisions contributed to deficient practices rising to Immediate Jeopardy in F678, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and F773, Laboratory Notifications. Additionally, administration failed to ensure nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident (F726, Competent Nursing Staff). Findings include: The undated facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan documented the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee was comprised of the Administrator,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 09/22/2025- 11/20/2025, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #94 and #95) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #94 and #95 were discharged to home after discontinuation of Medicare Part A services and the facility did not provide the resident with the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10123) for Medicare Part A as required. Findings include:The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services form Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10123 instructions documented a Medicare health provider must give an advance, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage to enrollees receiving skilled nursing services, no later than two days before the termination of services. The Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification Review completed by the facility documented Resident #94 had a Medicare covered stay with a start date of 04/29/2025, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted [DATE] -[DATE], the facility did not ensure all investigations were reported to the State Survey Agency within five (5) working days of the incident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #85) reviewed. Specifically, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not initiated for Resident #85 per their Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment and was not reported to the New York State Department of Health as required. Refer to F678 (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation).Findings include: The facility policy Accident-Incidents, dated [DATE], documented the Director of Nursing and Administrator were responsible to review Incident/Investigations and conclusions to determine if incident required reporting to outside agencies such as the Department of Health.The 08/2016 New York State Department of Health Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual documented at least one of the following elements must be present for an incident to be reportable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE], the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (one) of three (3) residents (Resident #85) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #85 had an unwitnessed fall on [DATE] at 6:00 PM and there was no documented evidence the resident was assessed by a qualified professional.Findings include:The facility policy Falls Management and Prevention, revised 1/2023, documented in the event a resident had fallen and/or was found on the ground, a completed head-to-toes assessment must be performed. Resident #85 had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), high blood pressure, and anxiety disorder. The [DATE] admission Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact, required partial assistance of one for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (#2565048) surveys conducted 09/22/2025-11/20/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents # 70 and #80) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #70's physician orders documented aspiration precautions (used to prevent food, fluids, or secretions from entering the airway) with no straws, the resident was provided a straw during meals and was not assisted with meals as care planned; Resident #80 did not have planned fall interventions in place and their call bell was not in reach. Findings include: The facility policy Aspiration Precautions, revised 12/2023, documented the resident would be offered food and liquids at a rate and portion size the resident was able to tolerate. The resident would be monitored for pocketing (holding food in mouth without swallowing) or coughing during and after intake of food and liquids. The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care and Support, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the extended recertification survey conducted 09/22/2025-11/20/2025, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing care and related services to assure residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident for five (5) of five (5) licensed nurses (Licensed Practical Nurses #6, #7, #10, #27, and #29) reviewed. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #29 performed feeding tube care for Resident #5 that did not meet professional standards for infection control; and Licensed Practical Nurses #6, #7, #10, #27, and #29 did not have documented education or competencies completed annually in accordance with the needs identified in the Facility Assessment. Deficiencies were identified in the areas of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (F678) and Infection Control (F880). Findings include:The undated Facility Educator job description documented the Facility Educator was responsible for planning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 09/22/2025-11/20/2025, the facility did not ensure they established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #5, #43, and #80) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #43's urinary catheter (drains urine from the bladder) collection bag was uncovered and laying directly on the floor without a barrier, and the resident did not have appropriate transmission-based precaution signage posted; Resident #5 was on enhanced barrier precautions and Licensed Practical Nurse #29 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment when disconnecting the resident's tube feeding; and Certified Nurse Aide #28 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment when providing direct care to Resident #80 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings include:The facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in a manner and environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 6 of 11 residents (Residents #19, #36, #59, #379, and 2 anonymous residents) reviewed. Specifically, - Activities aide #7 and licensed practical nurse #2 had a verbal confrontation in front of Resident #19 after they ran out of portable oxygen during a group activity; - Certified nurse aide #8 stood over Resident #36 while assisting them with eating; - Resident #59 exhibited continuous disruptive verbal behaviors in a common area with other residents and was not removed from the space timely as planned. Additionally, the resident was transported in their wheelchair facing backwards by certified nurse aide #9; - 2 anonymous residents stated during a group meeting that staff would tell them they could not leave their rooms because portable oxygen was not available; - Certified nurse aide #10 entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312922 and NY00340114) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 (North and South units) resident units and the main dining room. Specifically, on the North unit resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had used incontinence briefs on the floor and nightstand; resident 209 smelled of urine; resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door handle was broken; and resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER] had sliding glass door restrictors that were not maintained. On the South unit resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] light fixtures were missing covers, had open light sockets, and exposed wiring; and there was a broken table in the main dining room. Additionally, residents received cold beverages in disposable cups at meals. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights revised 2/2020 documented the residents had a right to a dignified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00212922, NY00310702, and NY00310431) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #1, #12, #35, and #37) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was not assisted with dressing; Resident #12 was not assisted with bathing; Resident #35 was not assisted out of bed or supervised with meals; Resident #37 had unclean and untrimmed fingernails. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living Care and Support revised 3/13/2024 documented residents received activities of daily living care and support in accordance with current standards of practice based on the resident's assessed needs, personal preferences, and goals of care. Care and support were provided to residents who were unable to carry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312922) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident received at least three meals daily at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests and plans of care for 2 of 2 nursing units (North unit and South unit) observed. Specifically, resident meal trays were delivered to nursing floors up to 1 hour and 25 minutes after the scheduled mealtimes. Findings include: The facility policy Meal Service revised 4/2022 documented meals would be delivered promptly to assure quality. During an interview on 5/6/2024 at 8:30 AM Resident #19 stated sometimes the meals came late due to the kitchen being short staffed. The facility's posted schedule documented the following mealtimes: Breakfast: -North Unit 8 AM. -South Unit 8:15 AM. -Dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:35 AM and 8:45 AM. Lunch: -Dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:15 PM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen walk-in cooler floor and door, walk-in freezer door, hood filters, the wall beside the coffee station, and the ceiling were in disrepair and there were several unclean surfaces present throughout the kitchen. Findings include: The Food Service Department policy Cleaning Policy last reviewed 1/2023 documented the nutrition and food service staff would maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of the dining and food service areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. There was no documented evidence of a kitchen cleaning schedule. During an initial main kitchen tour on 5/6/2024 the following was observed: - at 6:11 AM, one filter was out of place at the right end of the hood above the flat top stove. - at 6:20 AM, the door to the walk-in freezer would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312922 and NY00310431) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #36 and #45) reviewed and the facility lacked a water management plan to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella (a bacteria found in water systems). Specifically, staff was observed not wearing the required personal protective equipment in Resident #45's room who was on transmission-based precautions; and Resident #36 had extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (enzyme resistant to most antibiotics) in their urine with an indwelling medical device and enhanced barrier precautions were not properly maintained. Additionally, the facility did not have a water management plan that detailed their policy and procedures for reducing the risk of growth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not maintain equipment in safe operating condition for 2 of 2 unit kitchenette refrigerators. Specifically, the unit kitchenette refrigerators did not maintain proper temperatures. Findings include: During an observation on 5/6/2024 at 7:30 AM, the South Unit kitchenette had an upright white refrigerator labeled, out of order-do not use. The refrigerator portion was empty. The thermometer inside read 65 degrees Fahrenheit. The freezer portion held some frozen food items that included ice cream bars, frozen drinks, and individual portions of ice cream. Additionally, there was a small black refrigerator that had the door left ajar a few inches. There were drinks for resident use had a measured temperature of 41.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The door hit the side of the cooler and had to be physically pushed closed for the door to seal properly. During an observation on 5/6/2024 at 7:13 AM, the North Unit kitchenette refrigerator thermometer read 58 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident's ability to safely self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #45 had lidocaine-prilocaine cream (topical cream used to numb skin before a medical procedure) at their bedside and there was no documented evidence the resident was assessed for their ability to safely self-administer the medication. Findings include: The facility policy Medication-Self Administration reviewed 7/2019 documented the staff and practitioner would assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications was clinically appropriate for the resident. If the team determined that a resident could not safely administer medications, all medications would be administered by a nurse from the stored medication in the med cart. Staff would identify and give the charge nurse any medications found at the bedside that were not authorized for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 of resident (Resident #72) reviewed. Specifically Resident #72 did not have resident-specific interventions for their language barrier or for their potential to become a victim of verbal or physical abuse. Findings include: The facility policy Translation Services last revised 1/2020, documented the facility's language access program would ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. The facility policy Residents Rights last revised 2/2020, documented residents had the right to communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility The facility policy Behavior Management last revised 5/2020, documented the facility must provide an interdisciplinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident in their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #13 and #36) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #13 and #36 were not offered meaningful activities of their choosing as care planned. The facility policy Recreational Services last reviewed 5/2019 documented the facility must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. 1) Resident #13 was had diagnoses including depression and left lower leg amputation. The 8/17/2023 Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340114, NY00310431, NY00336364, and NY00310702) surveys the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #60) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #60 had a recommendation for a follow up appointment with nephrology (kidney specialist) and there was no documented evidence the follow-up appointment was scheduled or occurred. Findings include: The facility policy Residents Rights last revised 2/2020 documented residents had the right to communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility with a diagnose including chronic kidney disease, and acute kidney failure. The 2/22/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with transferring and ambulation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312922 and NY00314056) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 9 residents (Residents #42 and #379) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #379's bed was not maintained in the low position and their call bell was not in reach and Resident #42 was observed wandering, unsupervised, into other resident rooms without interventions in place for monitoring; Findings include: The facility policy Falls Management and Prevention revised 11/2019 documented the interdisciplinary team would identify and implement appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. The staff would implement goals and interventions with resident/ family for inclusion in the interdisciplinary care plan based on the resident's individual needs. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312922) surveys conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #75) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #75 was not weighed as ordered, did not received fortified pudding, and was not assisted with meals as care planned. Findings include: The facility policy Nutrition Assessment revised 8/2020 documented the nutritional assessment would be a systematic, multidisciplinary process that included gathering and interpreting data and using that data to help define meaningful interventions for the resident at risk for or with impaired nutrition. Once current conditions and risk factors for impaired nutrition were assessed and analyzed, individual care plans would be developed that addressed or minimized to the extent possible the resident's risks for nutritional complications. Such interventions would be developed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident who required dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #45 received hemodialysis (a treatment that filters the blood), had a physician order to remove the dialysis access site dressing 6-8 hours after dialysis and the dressing was scheduled to be removed prior to going to dialysis and was not completed. Findings include: The Entrance Conference Worksheet provided to the facility on 5/6/2024 included information needed from the facility regarding dialysis contracts, agreements, arrangements and policies and procedures. The facility responded they did not currently have any residents who received dialysis. There was no documented evidence of a hemodialysis agreement or policy and procedures. Resident #45 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidney disease) and dependence on renal dialysis. The 4/16/2024 Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (Medication cart #2 on South unit) reviewed. Specifically, medication cart #2 on the South unit had an insulin lispro pen (short acting insulin) for Resident #25 that was not dated with an opened or expiration date; an insulin glargine pen (long acting insulin) for Resident #62 that was not dated with an opened or expiration date; and an Anoro Ellipta inhaler (used to treat chronic lung disease) for Resident #72 that was not dated with an opened or expiration date. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Storage revised 1/2019 documented medications were stored in a manner that maintained the integrity of the product, ensured the safety of residents and was in accordance with department of health guidelines. Expired medications were removed from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and appetizing for 2 of 2 test trays (5/7/2024 and 5/8/2024 lunch trays) reviewed. Specifically, on 5/7/2024 the beef stew was 114 degrees Fahrenheit and the green and yellow bean mix was 108 degrees Fahrenheit; and on 5/8/2024 the French-fried potatoes were cold and undercooked. Findings include: The facility Beef Stew recipe documented hold food for service at an internal temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility policy Meal Service last revised 1/2023, documented meals would be served promptly to maintain adequate temperature and appearance. During an interview on 5/6/2024 at 8:37 AM, Resident #66 stated the food was cold. During the lunch meal observation on 5/7/2024 at 12:00 PM, the temperature of the food on the meal service line was checked. The beef stew was 173 degrees Fahrenheit, yellow and green…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received and the facility provided a diet in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #33 was provided food items that were not consistent with their physician ordered diet. Findings include: The facility policy Modified Food Consistency last reviewed 2/2023, documented the texture and consistency-modified diets would be individualized with modifications made by the speech/language pathologist and physician in conjunction with the registered dietitian nutritionist and Director of Food and Nutrition services. A written order was needed. Resident #33 had diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and cervicalgia (neck pain). The 4/25/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision or touching assistance with eating, did not have a swallowing disorder, and did not receive a mechanically altered diet. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had a means of directly contacting staff for assistance for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #35's call bell was out of reach and not accessible. Findings include: The facility policy Call Bells revised 8/2019 documented timely response was provided to residents in need of assistance and was essential that high quality resident outcomes were ensured. When the resident was in bed staff ensured the call light was within easy reach of the resident. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent for toileting, bathing, transfers, and dressing. The comprehensive care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/6/2024-5/10/2024, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 1 of 1 resident room. Specifically, there was evidence of mice in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings include: The third-party pest control vendor service reports documented resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was treated for mice and rodents on 1/17/2024, 3/6/2024, 3/13/2024, and 3/20/2024. The third-party pest control log dated 5/8/2024 did include documentation about mice or treatments for rodents in the facility. The log documented the facility was inspected and serviced. During an interview on 5/6/2024 at 8:22 AM, Resident #66 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated they had caught a mouse in their room recently but there was another they were still trying to catch. They stated they had a mouse come out of the heater the past two nights in a row. The mouse ran out of their room and into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00320770), the facility did not ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #8). Specifically, Resident #8 had orders to apply a condom catheter (urinary collection device) in the evening and the order was not implemented timely. Findings include: Resident #8 had diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (inability to completely empty urine from the bladder) and Parkinson's disease. The 7/8/2023 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, they required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living and were frequently incontinent of urine. The 7/6/2023 comprehensive care plan documented the resident had an alteration in the urinary system related to diagnoses and a history of urinary tract infections. Interventions included monitoring intake and output per policy, monitoring and reporting signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections, and a urology consult as needed. The 7/6/2023 physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00324772), the facility did not ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted with a continuous positive airway pressure machine (applies pressure to keep airway open when sleeping) and the facility did not clarify the hospital discharge instructions and did not consult with the medical provider to have the resident's need for the machine evaluated. The resident's continuous positive airway pressure machine was removed by the family prior to any clarification of the resident's needs. Findings include: The Respiratory-PAP (positive airway pressure) Equipment policy revised 3/2021 documented: - Patients with obstructive sleep apnea use continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure to force air through their obstructed airways. - A sleep study should be done to determine the proper pressure levels. - The physician's order is to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00317600), the facility did not ensure all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #12). Specifically, the facility identified that controlled substances for Resident #12 were unaccounted for and the facility's investigation was not thorough and complete. All involved staff were not re-educated on the process for accounting for controlled substances to prevent reoccurrence and the incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) as required. Findings include: The facility Narcotic Count policy dated 8/2018 documented the on-coming and off-going nurse assignment to the medication cart will be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the controlled drug count. The policy further documented the 2 nurses would look at the medication cards, bottles, etc. together and would verify and document the count. If the amount documented and the number of pills did not match, nurses were to stay on the unit, determine why there was a discrepancy, call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review during the abbreviated survey (NY00306191), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents(Resident #7) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 had abnormal laboratory values and there was no documented evidence the medical provider was notified. Findings include: The facility policy Lab Procedure revised 5/2021 documented lab results were checked by the clinical nurse and the physician was notified of the results. The notification would be written on the Lab Results form. All lab results were kept in a designated place until seen and signed by the physician. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, and end stage renal disease (ESRD). The 8/16/2022 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL). The 10/15/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00315289), the facility did not ensure a resident who entered the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently received one was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that catheterization was necessary for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #11 returned to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that removes urine from the bladder into a drainage bag) after a hospital stay, was not assessed for continued need of the urinary catheter and did not receive a urology consultation per medical recommendation. Findings include: The facility policies Catheter-Female Insertion, revised 2/2019; Catheter Care revised 5/2019; and Catheter Guidelines created 8/2019 did not include documentation related to indications for catheter use and/or catheter removal. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS, a progressive central nervous system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00288852) conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 72 of 78 residents reviewed. Specifically, on during the lunch meal on Sunday 3/6/22, residents received their food on disposable dishes. Additionally, during the resident group meeting 1 anonymous resident stated meals were frequently served on plastic disposable dishes on the weekends. Findings include: The facility Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident booklet dated 6/2010 documents each resident has the right to be treated with dignity, respect, and consideration at all times. The facility Meal Service Policy revised 9/2021 documents a comfortable and attractive atmosphere will be maintained. The 3/6/22 Food Service staff schedule documented: - 1 [NAME] scheduled 6 AM - 2 PM, - 1 Diet Aide scheduled 8 AM - 8 PM, - 1 Diet Aide scheduled 6 AM - 2 PM, which documented Called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00262523, NY00280940, NY00270167, NY00288852, NY00276986, NY00282348, NY00283195, NY00285834 and NY00290976) conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 11 residents (Residents #35, 50, 71 and 75) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #50 did not receive incontinence care as requested; Resident #71 did not receive assistance with care and transfers out of bed as requested and missed therapy; Resident #75 did not receive a shower on their designated/care planned day: and Resident #35 did not have their call bell answered timely. Findings include: The facility policy ADL Support revised 10/2019, documents the residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00288852) surveys conducted 3/6/22- 3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure the resident menus were followed for 5 of 18 meals observed. Specifically, the facility ran out of preplanned menu items and substituted with items that were not nutritionally equivalent, served inadequate portion sizes, and did not inform the residents of menu substitutions. Finding included: The facility policy Portion Control dated 4/2019 documents the menu items shall be served according to pre-determined portion size. The portion size on spreadsheet reflects the amount of the menu item required to provide nutrient standards for that item when prepared according to the standardized recipe. The facility policy Menu Substitution revised 4/2019 documents food substitutions will be made as appropriate and necessary. The Food Service Director, in conjunction with the clinical [registered] dietitian (RD) or diet technician registered (DTR) may make food substitutions as appropriate or necessary. The food service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00288852 and NY00270167) conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure food and drink was palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures for 2 meals observed and for 1 of 2 meal test trays. Specifically, the cranberry juice served at dinner on 3/8/22 was watered down and not palatable, the chicken noodle soup served at lunch on 3/8/22, was not attractive, and the test tray for the dinner meal on 3/7/22 was bland and not served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Additionally, Residents #13, 34, 37, 44, 50 and 75 and several anonymous residents during the resident group meeting stated the food was not palatable, appetizing, and was often served cold. Findings include: The facility policy Food Safety-Food Handling revised 9/2021 documents the food will be stored prepared, handled, and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. The facility policy Meal Service revised 9/2021 documents meals will be served promptly to maintain adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00288852) surveys conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks were provided to residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times, consistent with the resident plan of care for 2 of 2 nursing units (North Unit and South Unit) observed. Specifically, residents did not have snack items available on the nursing units. Findings include: The facility policy Clinical Operations dated 4/2020 documents snacks are available 24 hours per day for any resident based on customary routine, request or requires additional calories due to inadequate meal consumption, promote weight gain or maintenance, need for additional protein for wound healing, or other therapeutic considerations. Dietary is responsible for stocking each nursing pantry with a variety of snacks to be available between meals for those who desire them and/or need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen reviewed. Specifically, the mechanical dishwasher was not clean and did not adequately sanitize dishware: expired milk was observed in the walk-in cooler for two days; and there was improper hot holding of hot dogs, mashed potatoes, and soup. Findings include: The facility policy Dish Washing and Storage updated 6/17/19, documents: - Dishes, pots, and pans will be washed and dried using procedures, chemicals and equipment that result in clean, sanitized dishes, pans, flatware, and utensils. - Low Temperature Dishwasher: Spray Type Dish Machines Using Chemicals to Sanitize Minimum Wash temperature: 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Final Rinse Temperature of 120 F and sanitization 50 parts per million (PPM) Hypochlorite. Dishes, pots, pans, utensils and flatware, must be air dried before being stored. Do not dry with towels. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00292100 and NY00262523) conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote the healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #71) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #71 developed unstageable pressure ulcers (full-thickness tissue loss with the wound bed obscured by dead tissue) on their right and left heels and the planned intervention of heel protection boots was not consistently implemented. Findings include: The facility policy Pressure Wound Prevention revised 10/2021, documents to inspect skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or ADLs. Inspect pressure points (sacrum, heels, buttocks, coccyx, elbows, ischium, trochanter, etc.), moisturize dry skin daily, reposition resident as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00280940 and NY00285834) surveys conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #71) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #71 developed a pressure ulcer, and a timely nutritional assessment was not completed, and weights were not obtained as ordered. Findings include: The facility policy Weight Assessment and Interventions revised 5/2021 documents the multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for the residents. Obtaining weights: the nursing staff will measure the resident weight within 24 hours of admission, weekly for four weeks, and then monthly. Weights will be recorded in the medical record for each resident. Any weight change of 5 pounds (lbs) in a month and 3 lbs in a week since the last weight assessment will be retaken within 48 hours. The licensed nurse will notify the dietitian of the weight change once reviewed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00287009) surveys conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #21) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #21 had a physician order for 1000 milligrams (mg) of Metformin (used to lower blood sugar) and was administered 500 mg of Metformin. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Administration, revised 12/2019, documents medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes. The 1/18/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL). Physician orders dated 2/8/22 documented Metformin HCl tablet 500 mg, administer 1,000 mg by mouth two times a day for diabetes. The 3/2022 medication administration record (MAR) documented Metformin HCl 500 mg tablet starting 2/7/22. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-14 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00288852) conducted 3/6/22-3/14/22, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #35 was not provided their soft salad sandwich at mealtime and was not offered a suitable substitution. Finding include: The facility policy Menu Substitution revised 4/2019 documents food substitutions will be made as appropriate and necessary. The Food Service Director, in conjunction with the clinical [registered] dietitian (RD) or registered diet technician (DTR) may make food substitutions as appropriate or necessary. The food service shift supervisor will make substitutions only when unavoidable. The resident's likes and dislikes will be considered when making substitutions. The 3/8/22 Lunch Production tally documented there were 2 orders of bite sized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-11-20 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted from 09/22/2025-11/20/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were informed during their stay of their rights and rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities eight (8) of ten (10) residents present at the Resident Group Meeting. Specifically, eight (8) anonymous residents in the resident meeting stated they were not aware of where information on the state complaint hotline, the ombudsman, or other pertinent State agencies were posted; they were not aware of their rights or where they were posted; and the State complaint hotline and other pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups were in small print and not posted at a resident accessible level.Findings include:The facility policy Resident Rights, revised 05/28/2024, documented Federal and state laws guaranteed certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. Residents had the right to communicate with outside agencies (e.g., local, state, or federal officials, state and federal surveyors, state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$191,992 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $115,564 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
  • $9,796 — penalty dated 2025-01-07
  • $66,632 — penalty dated 2023-12-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareHammonton, NJ 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareGloversville, NY 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5Martine Center For Rehabilitation And NursingWhite Plains, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Troy Center For Rehabilitation And NursingTroy, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROZENBERG, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY97%since 01/01/2025
GOLDMAN, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
HENDRIX, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
LANTZITSKY, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
ANDERSON, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2024
PATEL, DARSHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 17%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,250per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$399per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335548. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next