No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty H

91 Tompkins Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10304 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 372 certified beds · (718) 876-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (718) 876-1200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Aug 2023
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1140 Bay St · (718) 447-7483 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
75 Vanderbilt Ave · (800) 658-6146 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11 Tompkins Ave · (646) 785-6624 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Is 49 Bertha A Dreyfus, 101 Warren St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.7%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.1%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.3%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.8%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.2%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table44.7%13.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%9.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.531.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.381.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
81.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 81.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.9%CMS range 35.1–50.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.5–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge81.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.9–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
28.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 372 beds and averages 358.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility did not ensure a building elevator was maintained in a safe working condition. This was observed in 1 (Elevator #4) of 4 facility elevators. Specifically, residents and staff complained Elevator #4 was not in good working condition, and on 12/12/2025 at 12:28 PM, a staff was stuck inside Elevator #4 and was not able to get out of the elevator until staff came to assist them The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled 'Maintenance Services' dated 5/28/2025 documented the facility provides maintenance service to the facility, grounds and equipment.Review of multiple 'Completed Service Ticket' from the elevator vendor revealed that service calls were made on 07/02/2025, 07/23/2025, 08/11/2025, 08/17/2025, 08/27/2025, 08/29/2025, and 09/04/2025.On 12/12/2025 at 11:25 AM, Resident #41 was interviewed and stated Elevator #4 skips floors, bounces and does not always work properly.On 12/12/2025 at 12:28 PM, screams for help and banging were heard coming from inside Elevator #4. Certified Nursing Assistant #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident's and/or resident's representative were afforded the right to participate in the care plan process. This was evident for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #348 and Resident #349) reviewed for Care Planning out of 37 residents. Specifically, Resident #349 and Resident #348's representative were not invited to participate in all of their care plan meetings. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team dated 10/2025 and last revised date 08/2019 documented, the resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are invited and encourage to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family. Resident #349 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included paraplegia and muscle spasms. The Quarterly Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident on one (1) of seven (7) units (Unit 2 AB) in the neurobehavioral building. Specifically, resident's rooms were noted with broken and worn furniture, bed frames and legs with rust, discolored, streaked floors, television and dining room furniture in disrepair. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Home Like Environment' reviewed 9/1/2024 documented residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings. The facility policy and procedure titled 'Maintenance Services' dated 5/28/2025 documented the facility provides maintenance service to the facility, grounds and equipment.During observations of Unit 2 AB from 12/11/2025 at 10:30 AM to 12/18/2025 at 1:00 PM, the following were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1 Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to meet a resident's need. This was evident of one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #6) reviewed for Care Planning out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, a comprehensive care plan for bowel management was not developed for Resident #6 who had a history of constipation. The findings are:The policy titled 'Care Plan Comprehensive' created 10/2015 and revised 12/18/2024 documented interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The policy also documented identifying problem areas and their cause and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process.Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular Accident, Malnutrition, and Depression. On 12/11/2025 at 3:40 PM, Resident #6 was interviewed and stated they have a long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:6Number of residents cited:1 Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was evident for one (1) of (six) 6 residents (Resident #184) reviewed during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, the functioning of the Gastrostomy tube was not verified prior to administration of medications to Resident #184. The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Enteral Tube Placement Verification' last revised 08/27/2025 documented placement verification of an established enteral tube will be confirmed utilizing bedside verification methods (examples external tube length, evaluation of gastric residual volume and/or power of hydrogen of gastric aspirate). The Licensed Nurse will verify placement of the enteral tube prior to each use including but not limited to feedings, flushes and medication administration by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for one (1) of seven (7) neurobehavioral units (Unit 2 AB) out of total 13 units observed during Dining Observation. Specifically, food items served during lunch meal service were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Meal Service' reviewed 01/2023 documented individuals will be encouraged to receive their meals in the dining room. The policy also documented meals will be served promptly to maintain adequate temperature and appearance. The Meal Delivery Schedule Sheet documented lunch for Unit 2 AB was served at 12:00 PM. On 12/11/2025 at 12:08 PM, a dining observation was conducted on neurobehavioral unit 2 AB. Meals were observed served in a disposable lunch box and appeared unappetizing, and lukewarm in temperature.On 12/15/2025 at 11:11 AM, a test tray was requested for neurobehavioral Unit 2 AB.On 12/15/2025 at 11:30 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility did not ensure it provided a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evident for staff bathrooms and nurses station. Specifically, staff bathrooms and nursing stations were not maintained in a sanitary and comfortable manner. The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Maintenance Services' created 20/12 and revised 5/28/2025 documented the maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the facility, grounds and equipment in a safe and operable manner. 1. During multiple observations of the environment conducted from 12/11/2025 to 12/18/2025 the following were observed: a). In the 1st Floor staff bathroom, the walls were in disrepair and were stained with a blackish, brown colored substance, the white metal trash bin on the wall had brown discoloration, and gray colored material exposed. b). In the 1st Floor Nurses Station, the blue colored drawers had brownish discoloration and drawers leaning out of the desk, and white paint located underneath the nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00333922), the facility failed to ensure that a Resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident in one out of six residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1, who was escorted by Home Health Aide #1, eloped from a clinic appointment on 02/20/24 at 12:35 am. Home Health Aide #1 stated that Resident #1 was a few steps behind them in the waiting room of the clinic and when they turned around Resident #1 was gone. Resident #1 was located on 02/27/24 and was transported to the hospital by Emergency Medical Service on 02/27/24 with diagnosis of alcohol withdrawal. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure, entitled Elopement Prevention with revision date 09/01/23, documented that the facility strives to promote resident safety while maintaining the least restrictive environment to protect the rights and dignity of the resident. The facility policy did not include preventive measures for Residents at risk for elopement and being escorted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that cold foods were stored at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and below, and the refrigerator temperature was not maintained at 41 F and below. The findings are: The facility policy titled Food Safety and Handling dated 9/2021 documented the food will be stored, prepared, handled, and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. During an observation with the Food Service Manager (FSM) on 8/14/2023 at 9:18 AM, the kitchen beverage refrigerator was 45 F, and the bread refrigerator was 60 F. During an observation on 8/18/2023 at 12:13 PM, the Cook's refrigerator #2 was 45 F. Refrigerator #2 contained liquid eggs that were 44.2 F and a pan of leftover barbecue chicken that was 42.1 F. On 8/18/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, the garbage compactor was observed without a lid or door to prevent the harboring and feeding of flies. The findings are: The facility policy titled Garbage and Rubbish Disposal dated 1/2023 documented outside dumpsters provided by garbage pick-up services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. During a kitchen observation on 8/17/2023 at 9:25 AM, the garbage compactor located outside of the facility did not have a lid or door, was filled with garbage, and had multiple flies surrounding the pile of garbage. On 8/21/2023 at 9:02 AM, the Director of Housekeeping (DH) was interviewed and stated the waste management company provides the compactor and does the waste pick up service. The trash compactor has never been and is not currently equipped with a lid or door and always remains open. The DH stated any pest issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 8/14/23 to 8/21/23, the facility did not ensure residents' right to communicate with individuals and entities external to the facility. This was evident for 11 of 11 attendees of the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, the facility did not have a system in place for residents to receive and send mail on Saturdays. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Resident Mail revised 09/2021 documented all resident mail/packages need to be delivered daily, including Saturdays. On 08/16/23 at 11:00 AM, a Resident Council meeting was held with 11 residents of the facility. All eleven residents present at the meeting stated that they were not able to receive mail on Saturdays and the Recreation Director delivers the mail Monday through Friday. On 08/21/23 at 10:57 AM, the Director of Recreation (DOR) was interviewed and stated that when mail is delivered, it is sorted and dispersed to the Recreation department from the admission department. If packages are delivered they are provided to Security…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification survey conducted from 08/14/2023 to 08/21/2023, the facility did not ensure infection prevention and control practices were maintained. This was evident for 5 residents (Resident #336, #99, #155, #335, and #325) out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) hand hygiene was not performed during tracheostomy care, 2) a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed not donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately prior to entering the room of a resident on contact precautions for Candida Auris. In addition, blood sugar monitoring devices and insulin pen placed on surfaces in the resident's room were taken out of the room to be discarded/stored on the medication cart without being sanitized; 3) an LPN used a stethoscope for a resident on contact isolation, did not sanitize it upon leaving the resident's room, and placed in on the top surface of the medication cart, 4) hand hygiene was not performed appropriately during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a dignified existence. This was evident for 2 (Resident #225 and #166) of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #225 was fed by staff standing over them, and 2) Resident #166 was not provided with clothing to ensure they were dressed appropriately. The findings are: The facility policy titled Quality of Life/Dignity dated 10/2022 documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Resident #225 had diagnoses of autism and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #225 had severely impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one person for eating. On 8/14/2023 at 12:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 was observed standing over Resident #225 while feeding the resident. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure the resident and their representative were provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan (BCP). This was evident for 4 (Residents #170, #327, #351, and #334) of 35 total sampled residnts. Specifically, 1) Resident #170's designated representative was not provided with a copy of the resident's BCP, 2) Resident #327 was not provided with a copy of their BCP, 3) Resident #351 was not provided with a copy of their BCP, and 4) Resident #334 was not provided with a copy of their BCP. The findings are but not limited to: The facility policy titled BCP dated 4/2023 documented the facility will provide the resident and the representative (if applicable) with a written summary of the BCP by completion of the comprehensive care plan (CCP). Facility will document and record receipt of information by family in the resident's clinical record. 1) Resident #170 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey conducted from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/23, the facility did not ensure a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to meet the resident's goal, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #351) of 1 resident reviewed for Dental out of 38 total sample residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a CCP was developed and implemented for oral/dental concerns for a resident who was observed with missing teeth and poor dentition. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plans - Comprehensive reviewed 8/21/2023 documented it is facility's policy that the Interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered, care plan for each resident. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review, and interviews during the Recertification survey from 8/14/23 to 8/21/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident with a sacral pressure ulcer receive the necessary care and treatment to prevent infection of ulcer. Specifically, there was no dressing observed to the sacral area for a resident with a Stage Suspected Deep Tissue Injury pressure ulcer. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) resident reviewed for Pressure Ulcers out of 38 sampled residents. (Resident # 335). The finding is: Resident #335 was initially admitted with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus, Necrotizing Fasciitis, and Gastrostomy status. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #335 was severely cognitively impaired, required dependent assistance of two staff with activities of daily living, was at risk for pressure ulcer, and had one Stage 4 and two unstageable pressure ulcers present on admission. The Physician Order dated 7/24/2023 documented to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #166) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, interventions to address Resident #166's significant weight loss were not implemented to prevent further weight loss. The findings are: Resident # 166 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #166 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with feeding, and had an unplanned weight loss. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) related to nutritional status last reviewed 05/23/2023 documented Resident #166 had a significant undesired 3-month weight loss. Interventions included a gastroenterologist (GI) consult for possible feeding tube. the goal was to maintain Resident #166's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record reviews conducted during a Recertification survey from 8/14/23 to 8/21/23, the facility did not ensure timely identification and removal of expired medications. Specifically, expired medications were observed in the Emergency Medication Box on Unit 4. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Medication Storage effective 2/2014 and revised 1/2022 documented that expired, discontinued and/or contaminated medications will be removed from the medication storage area and disposed of in accordance with facility policy. On 08/17/2023 at 04:15 PM, during the Medication Storage task conducted on Unit 4, the sealed emergency box medication checklist documented that Narcan 0.4mg/ml, quantity of 2, had an expiration date of 7/23/2023. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was interviewed immediately and stated that all nurses are supposed to check the emergency box. On 08/17/23 at 04:51 PM, LPN #8 was interviewed and stated that the emergency box monthly is checked monthly if it is not opened. LPN #8 also stated that they had looked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification survey conducted from 8/14/23 to 8/21/23, the facility did not ensure that all medications and biologicals were labeled properly and stored appropriately. Specifically, multiple bags of IV antibiotics were observed stored in a medication refrigerator without a thermometer, and one opened, undated vial of insulin was observed in the Medication cart. This was evident during observations conducted for the Medication Storage Task. (4th Floor) The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Storage dated 2/2014 and 1/2022 documented refrigerators used for medication storage will contain a thermometer to indicate the temperature within. Temperature will be checked daily to ensure it is within the specific range. If temperature is out of range, the refrigerator thermostat will be adjusted. On 08/17/2023 at 04:15 PM, three large Ziploc bags containing multiple bags of IV Vancomycin were observed stored in a refrigerator that did not contain a thermometer. Labeling on the packages indicated store at or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification and complaint (NY00318827) survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving major injury were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). This was evident for 1 (Resident #505) of residents reviewed for Abuse of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not report Resident #505's unwitnessed fall resulting in a head laceration was not reported to the NYSDOH. The findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Exploitation Prohibition dated 12/2022 documented the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone. Resident #505 had diagnoses of anemia and coronary artery disease (CAD). The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #505 was severely cognitively impaired and required the assistance of 2 people to complete activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification and complaint (NY00318827) survey from 8/14/2023 to 8/21/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #505) of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #505 fell and sustained a head laceration when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stepped away from the resident while providing care. The findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Exploitation Prohibition dated 12/2022 documented the facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. Resident #505 had diagnoses of anemia and coronary artery disease (CAD). The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #505 was severely cognitively impaired and required the assistance of 2 people to complete activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that the resident meals were attractive, palatable, delivered timely and that the meal temperatures were at an appetizing temperature. Specifically: 1)Residents complained of food palatability, lack of attractiveness, missing items, and hot meals served cold. (Res #s 29, 211, 253, 296, 303, 305, 212, and 5) 2) During dining task plate waste was observed during lunch meal. (3A/3B ) 3 )Lunch Test trays checked were found to be below the appetizing temperature for resident (res) consumption, and food trucks arrived late on 3 of 13 units. (Neuro 2EF, 2CD, 4EF, 4K and 3A, 3B, & 4th floor) 4 )The Resident Council President (Resident #351) and resident council minutes verified ongoing complaints of cold food, late meals, and other food quality complaints. This was evident for 7 of 13 units reviewed for Dining (Neuro 2EF, 2CD, 4EF, 4K and 3A, 3B, & 4th floor) and 8 of 36 sampled residents (Res #s 29, 211, 253, 296, 303, 305, 212 and 5). The findings include but are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure a residents representative was immediately notified of the need to alter treatment. Specifically, the Unit Nurse Manager did not inform a resident's family member when changes were made to the resident's psychotropic medication regimen. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Notification of Change (Resident #66). The finding is: Policy titled, Change in Condition Notification last reviewed 2/2021 documented the licensed nurse will notify the resident's next of kin/responsible person when a change in resident's medical or clinical treatment as identified by resident's Medical Doctor (MD). Resident #66 was diagnosed with respiratory failure with vent dependence and tracheostomy. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was dated 3/27/21 and documented Resident # 66 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive to total assistance of 2 persons with all Activities of Daily Living, had 2 stage IV pressure ulcers, and 1 deep tissue injury. The resident and family did not participate in the assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was person-centered and described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the CCP related to cognition was not complete with individualized interventions to meet the resident's needs. This was evident for 1 of 36 sampled residents (Resident #66). The finding is: A facility policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive was dated 10/2020 and documented care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment, identify professional services responsible for each element of care, and updates the care plan at least quarterly. Resident # 66 was diagnosed with respiratory failure with vent dependence, tracheostomy, and stage III pressure ulcer to the left heel. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was dated 3/27/21 and documented Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews conducted during a recertification survey (37JG11) completed on 6/30/2021, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, on 05/22/2021, Resident #313 had a fall and complained of left shoulder pain. The recommended left shoulder x-ray was not ordered and completed timely, and the resident was not diagnosed with a left clavicle fracture until 5/26/21, 4 days after the fall. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents (Resident #313). The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Accident-Incidents revised 07/2020 documented the facility to monitor and evaluate all occurrences of accidents or incidents or adverse events occurring on the facility's premises which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or care of a particular resident. An incident is any occurrence not consistent with the routine operational of the center, normal care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents received necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, residents on oxygen therapy were receiving oxygen at the incorrect flow rate. This was evident for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care out of a sample of 36 residents. Resident (#210 and 253). The findings are: 1) Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Hypertension, and Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired. The MDS also documented that the resident required extensive assistance for Activity of Daily Livings (ADLS). On 06/24/21 at 11:56 AM, the resident was observed sitting in a wheelchair (w/c) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional principles and the manufacturer's specifications. Specifically, a medication refrigerator was observed with melting ice from the freezer causing water leakage and pooling in and around the medications stored there, and an insulin pen was stored directly underneath the freezer, which was encased in ice. This was evident for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed during the Medication Storage task (Floor 4-AB) The findings are: Facility policy titled Medication - Storage was dated 2/2021 and documented medications will be stored in an orderly clean manner. Refrigerator should be defrosted regularly if required. Employee or resident food may not be stored in the medication refrigerator. The following are the Lantus-Solostar Manufacturer storage requirements for Lantus-Solostar insulin pens: Keep your Solostar® in cool storage (36°F-46°F [2°C-8°C]) until first use. Do not allow it to freeze. Do not put it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure proper storage of residents' personal food items according to professional standards for food safety. Specifically, a pantry refrigerator was observed to have undated and unlabeled resident food items with no use by date; and, one container of a spoiled substance. This was evident for 1 of 13 Unit Pantries. (Unit 4B) The findings are: A facility policy titled Food - From Outside was dated 2/2021 documented food left with the resident to consume later will be labeled, stored, and clearly distinguishable from facility prepared food. All refrigerator items will be discarded within 48 hours a perishable item will be labeled with a discard date. Nursing staff will monitor unit pantry and refrigeration units for food and beverage disposal. Nursing staff will discard any foods that show signs of potential foodborne danger (foul odor). On 06/24/21 at 12:37 PM, an observation was made of the Unit 4B pantry with Registered Nurse (RN) #5 present. The pantry room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey (37JG11) completed on 06/30/2021, the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1) a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 failed to perform required hand washing during a dressing change; and, 2) A Behavioral Health Specialist (BHS) #1 did not perform hand hygiene after resident care. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer (Resident #66) and 1 of 11 units (Unit - 2AB) observed for Infection Control. The findings are: 1) Facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcer (PU) Treatment was dated 11/2014 and documented procedure for wound dressing as: wash hands before treatment, apply gloves, remove soiled dressing and place in opened plastic bag, also remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareHammonton, NJ 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and NursingMinoa, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareGloversville, NY 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5Martine Center For Rehabilitation And NursingWhite Plains, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Troy Center For Rehabilitation And NursingTroy, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ABRAMCHIK, AMIRIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2012
ROZENBERG, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST95%since 04/01/2012
SICKLICK, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2015
GOLDMAN, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
HENDRIX, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
LANTZITSKY, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
BUCHSBAUM, PHILIPIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014
KATRI, YAKOUBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$69.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.3M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 2%Other / private 31%

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$557per resident / day
operating cost
$16,940per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$538per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335772. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next